2A6CYEZYLOCKUSW40Electronic Controlled Door Lock

External Photo Back External Photo Back Open External Photo Front External Photo Front External Photo Front

Labels

Internal Photo Back Internal Photo Front with circuit

HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103‐FCC‐RF Exposure © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page i of 5 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager RF Exposure Report (FCC) Report No.: WIR117103-FCC-RF Exposure Test Model: EZYLOCK FCC ID: 2A6CYEZYLOCKUSW40 Received Date: 02 /14 /2022 Test Date: 02 /17/ 2022 – 0 /28 /2022 Issued Date: 04/ 04/ /2022 Applicant: BRISA AMERICA CORP Address: 1420 Celebration Blvd., Suite 200 Orlando, FL 34747 Issued By: Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Lab Address: 3162 Belick St. Santa Clara CA, 95054 HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103‐FCC‐RF Exposure © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 2 of 5 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR-TEMP-ETS301-07-19-2021–Rev. 01 - Approved by DOC Manager 1. Certificate of Conformity Product: Electronic Controlled Door Lock Brand: Brisa Test Model: EZYLOCK Series Model: N/A Sample Status: Engineering Sample Applicant: BRISA AMERICA CORP Test Date: 02 /17/ 2022 – 0 /28 /2022 Standard: 47 CFR FCC Part 2.1093 Gary Chou Wireless Engineering Manager, Wireless Laboratory Engineering Statement: The measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures indicated, and the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the limits applicable. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements, and for the qualifications of all persons taking them. It is further stated that upon the basis of the measurements made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements of Part 22 Subpart H and Part 24 Subpart E and Part 27 Subpart L of the FCC Rules under normal use and maintenance. Eleazar Zuniga, Director, Wireless Laboratory Revision Report Date Reason for Revision  April 08, 2022 Initial Issue. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103‐FCC‐RF Exposure © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 3 of 5 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR-TEMP-ETS301-07-19-2021–Rev. 01 - Approved by DOC Manager 2. RF Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (V/m) Magnetic Field Strength (A/m) Power Density (mW/cm 2 ) Average Time (minutes) Limits For General Population / Uncontrolled Exposure 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f 2 )* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 ... ... f/1500 30 1500-100,000 ... ... 1.0 30 f = Frequency in MHz; *Plane-wave equivalent power density 2.1 MPE Calculation Formula Pd = (Pout*G) / (4*pi*r 2 ) Where Pd = power density in mW/cm 2 Pout = output power to antenna in mW G = gain of antenna in linear scale Pi = 3.1416 R = distance between observation point and center of the radiator in cm HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103‐FCC‐RF Exposure © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 4 of 5 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR-TEMP-ETS301-07-19-2021–Rev. 01 - Approved by DOC Manager 2.2 Antenna Gain WLAN : PCB Antenna with 3 dBi gain Cellular: PCB Antenna with 0 dBi gain for All band 2.3 Calculation Result of Maximum Conducted Power Type Frequency Band (MHz) Max Power (dBm) Max Power (mW) Turn-Up Tolerance Antenna Gain (dBi) Distance (cm) Power Density (mW/cm 2 ) Limit (mW/cm 2 ) WLAN 2.4GHz 2437 15.6 36.3078±1dB 3 20 0.018153 1 LTE B2/ B4 1880 25 398.10 ±1dB 0 20 0.174562 1 LTE B12 707.5 25 398.10 ±1dB 0 20 0.174562 0.471 Note: 1. Determining compliance based on the results of the compliance measurement, not taking into account measurement instrumentation uncertainty. 2. This device contains Model No. FCC ID Note Cellular SARA-R410M XPY2AGQN4NNN - WLAN/ BLE NINA-W156 XPYNINAW15 BLE function disable HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103‐FCC‐RF Exposure © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 5 of 5 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR-TEMP-ETS301-07-19-2021–Rev. 01 - Approved by DOC Manager 3. Conclusion Conclusion: The formula of calculated the MPE is: CPD1 / LPD1 + CPD2 / LPD2 + ......etc. < 1 CPD = Calculation power density LPD = Limit of power density Co-location worse case (WLAN 2.4GHz &LTE) Total MPE Percentage for 1.WLAN 2.4GHz, LTE to transmit simultaneously. t = 0.563334958< 1 Therefore, the maximum calculations of above situations are less than the “1” limit. The SAR evaluation is not required.

HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC-WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page i of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager April 04, 2022 BRISA AMERICA CORP Paulo Toledo 1420 Celebration Blvd., Suite 200 Orlando, FL 34747 Dear Paulo Toledo, Enclosed is the EMC Wireless test report for compliance testing of the Brisa, EZYLOCK Electronic Controlled Door Lock Commercial as tested to the requirements of Title 47 of the CFR, Ch. 1 (10-1-06 ed.), Part 15 Subpart C for Intentional Radiators. Thank you for using the services of Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. If you have any questions regarding these results or if Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. can be of further service to you, please feel free to contact me. Gary Chou Documentation Department Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Reference: WIR117103-FCC-WLAN Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. While use of the A2LA logo in this report reflects Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. accreditation under these programs, the report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by A2LA, or any agency of the Federal Government. This letter of transmittal is not a part of the attached report. Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. is part of the Eurofins Electrical & Electronics (E&E) global compliance network. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC-WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page ii of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com - FCC Test Report Applicant name: BRISA AMERICA CORP Product: Electronic Controlled Door Lock Report: WIR117103-FCC-WLAN Applicant Address: 1420 Celebration Blvd., Suite 200 Orlando, FL 34747 Prepared By: Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 3162 Belick St. Santa Clara CA, 95054 HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC-WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 3 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com - FCC Test Report Applicant name : BRISA AMERICA CORP Product: Electronic Controlled Door Lock Standard 47 CFR FCC Part 15, Subpart C (Section 15.247) ANSI C63.10: 2013 2009 Gary Chou Wireless Engineering Manager, Wireless Laboratory Engineering Statement: The measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures indicated, and the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the limits applicable. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements, and for the qualifications of all persons taking them. It is further stated that upon the basis of the measurements made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements of Part 22 Subpart H and Part 24 Subpart E and Part 27 Subpart L of the FCC Rules under normal use and maintenance. Eleazar Zuniga, Director, Wireless Laboratory HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC-WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 4 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com - Report Status Sheet Revision Report Date Reason for Revision  April 04, 2022 Initial Issue. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC-WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 5 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com - Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Equipment Information ........................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 B. References ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. Test Site .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 D. Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................................... 3 E. Modifications ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Modifications to EUT .................................................................................................................................. 5 Modifications to Test Standard .................................................................................................................... 5 F. Disposition of EUT ............................................................................................................................................. 5 III. Electromagnetic Compatibility Criteria for Intentional Radiators ..................................................................... 6 …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WI117103-FCC WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 31 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager EUT Test Condition Measurement Detail Input Power 6Vdc Frequency Range 1GHz‐26GHz Environmental Conditions 25 deg. C, 70% RH Tested By Rafael Aguilar Test Mode TX MODE 11 N20 2412 MHz Level [dBæV/m] Level [dBæV/m] HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WI117103-FCC WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 32 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Antenna Polarity & Test Distance: Vertical at 3m No. Frequency (MHz) Polarization Level Peak[dB(uV/m)] Limit Peak dB(uV/m) Margin Peak [dB] Height (cm) Angle (Deg) Factor [dB(1/m)] Pass/ Fail 1 4848.8 Vertical 45.32069 74 -28.6793 1.08 38 1.87 Pass 2 4848.8 Vertical 32.68233 54 -21.3177 1.08 38 1.87 Pass 3 17823 Vertical 54.07658 74 -19.9234 2.28 143 3.23 Pass 4 17823 Vertical 41.52477 54 -12.4752 2.28 143 3.23 Pass 5 2389.70 Vertical 57.64 74.00 -16.36 1.56 279.00 37.46 Pass 6 2389.70 Vertical 49.00 54.00 -5.00 1.56 279.00 37.46 Pass REMARKS: 1. Level (dBuV) = Reading (dBuV) + Factor (dB(1/m)). 2. Factor (dB(1/m)) = Antenna Factor(AF) (dB(1/m)) + Cable Loss (dB) +Preamplifier 3. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 4. The emission levels of other frequencies were less than 20dB margin against the limit. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WI117103-FCC WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 33 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager EUT Test Condition Measurement Detail Input Power 6Vdc Frequency Range 1GHz‐26GHz Environmental Conditions 25 deg. C, 70% RH Tested By Rafael Aguilar Test Mode TX MODE 11N20 2412 MHz Level [dBæV/m] Horizontal Level [dBæV/m] HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WI117103-FCC WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 34 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Antenna Polarity & Test Distance: Horizontal at 3m No. Frequency (MHz) Polarization Level Peak[dB(uV/m)] Limit Peak dB(uV/m) Margin Peak [dB] Height (cm) Angle (Deg) Factor [dB(1/m)] Pass/ Fail 1 5032.40 Horizontal 45.31 74.00 -28.69 1.43 299.00 2.50 Pass 2 5032.40 Horizontal 31.99 54.00 -22.01 1.43 299.00 2.50 Pass 3 11948.00 Horizontal 49.49 74.00 -24.51 1.92 124.00 3.99 Pass 4 11948.00 Horizontal 36.48 54.00 -17.52 1.92 124.00 3.99 Pass 5 17760.00 Horizontal 53.92 74.00 -20.08 1.25 16.00 3.32 Pass 6 17760.00 Horizontal 41.55 54.00 -12.45 1.25 16.00 3.32 Pass 7 2389.80 Horizontal 58.19 74.00 -15.81 1.38 281.00 37.50 Pass 8 2389.80 Horizontal 44.71 54.00 -9.29 1.38 281.00 37.50 Pass REMARKS: 1. Level (dBuV) = Reading (dBuV) + Factor (dB(1/m)). 2. Factor (dB(1/m)) = Antenna Factor(AF) (dB(1/m)) + Cable Loss (dB) +Preamplifier 3. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 4. The emission levels of other frequencies were less than 20dB margin against the limit. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WI117103-FCC WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 35 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager EUT Test Condition Measurement Detail Input Power 6Vdc Frequency Range 1GHz‐26GHz Environmental Conditions 25 deg. C, 70% RH Tested By Rafael Aguilar Test Mode TX MODE 11B 2437 MHz Antenna Polarity & Test Distance: Vertical at 3m No. Frequency (MHz) Polarization Level Peak[dB(uV/m)] Limit Peak dB(uV/m) Margin Peak [dB] Height (cm) Angle (Deg) Factor [dB(1/m)] Pass/ Fail 1 4830.10 Vertical 45.53 74.00 -28.47 1.01 282.00 1.81 Pass 2 4830.10 Vertical 32.36 54.00 -21.64 1.01 282.00 1.81 Pass 3 15465.00 Vertical 52.54 74.00 -21.46 1.27 4.00 4.79 Pass 4 15465.00 Vertical 39.86 54.00 -14.14 1.27 4.00 4.79 Pass 5 17912.00 Vertical 54.23 74.00 -19.77 1.77 266.00 3.08 Pass 6 17912.00 Vertical 41.48 54.00 -12.52 1.77 266.00 3.08 Pass 1. Level (dBuV) = Reading (dBuV) + Factor (dB(1/m)). 2. Factor (dB(1/m)) = Antenna Factor(AF) (dB(1/m)) + Cable Loss (dB) +Preamplifier 3. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value. 4. The emission levels of other frequencies were less than 20dB margin against the limit. Level [dBæV/m] HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WI117103-FCC WLAN © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Page 36 of 57 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager EUT Test Condition Measurement Detail Input Power 6Vdc Frequency Range 1GHz‐26GHz Environmental Conditions 25 deg. C, 70% RH Tested By Rafael Aguilar Test Mode TX MODE 11N20 2437 MHz Antenna Polarity & Test Distance: Horizontal at 3m No. Frequency (MHz) Polarization Level Peak[dB(uV/m)] Limit Peak dB(uV/m) Margin Peak [dB] Height (cm) Angle (Deg) Factor [dB(1/m)] Pass/ Fail 1 4945.70 Horizontal 46.34 74.00 -27.66 2.35 92.00 2.55 Pass 2 4945.70 Horizontal 32.58 54.00 -21.42 2.35 92.00 2.55 Pass 3 16030.00 Horizontal 53.02 74.00 -20.98 2.95 272.00 5.28 Pass 4 16030.00 Horizontal 40.51 54.00 -13.49 2.95 272.00 5.28 Pass 5 17869.00 Horizontal 54.12 74.00 -19.88 1.98 42.00 3.16 Pass 6 17869.00 Horizontal 41.24 54.00 -12.76 1.98 42.00 3.16 Pass REMARKS: 1. Level…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103_FCC_LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. .................................................. Page i of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager March 04, 2022 BRISA AMERICA CORP Paulo Toledo 1420 Celebration Blvd., Suite 200 Orlando, FL 34747 Dear Paulo Toledo, Enclosed is the RF Wireless test report for compliance testing of the Brisa, EZYLOCK Electronic Controlled Door Lock as tested to the requirements of the FCC Part Part 2, 22(H), 24(E), 27(L), 27(M), 27(H), 27(F),. Thank you for using the services of Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these results or if Eurofins E&E can be of further service to you. Sincerely yours, Gary Chou Documentation Department Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. While use of the A2LA logo in this report reflects Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. accreditation under these programs, the report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by A2LA, or any agency of the Federal Government. This letter of transmittal is not a part of the attached report. Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. is part of the Eurofins Electrical & Electronics (E&E) global compliance network. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page ii of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager FCC Test Report Applicant name: BRISA AMERICA CORP Product: Electronic Controlled Door Lock Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE Applicant Address: 1420 Celebration Blvd., Suite 200 Orlando, FL 34747 Prepared By: Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 3162 Belick St. Santa Clara CA, 95054 HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page 3 of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Applicant name: BRISA AMERICA CORP Product: Electronic Controlled Door Lock Standard 47 CFR Part 2, 22(H), 24(E), 27(L), 27(M), 27(H), 27(F) Gary Chou Wireless Engineering Manager, Wireless Laboratory Engineering Statement: The measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures indicated, and the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the limits applicable. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements, and for the qualifications of all persons taking them. It is further stated that upon the basis of the measurements made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements of Part 22 Subpart H and Part 24 Subpart E and Part 27 Subpart L of the FCC Rules under normal use and maintenance. Eleazar Zuniga, Director, Wireless Laboratory HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page 4 of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Report Status Sheet Revision Report Date Reason for Revision  March 04, 2022 Initial Issue. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page 5 of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Purpose of Test ................................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Equipment Information ........................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 B. References ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. Test Site .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 D. Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................................... 4 E. Modifications ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Modifications to EUT .............................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103_FCC_LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. .................................................. Page i of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager March 04, 2022 BRISA AMERICA CORP Paulo Toledo 1420 Celebration Blvd., Suite 200 Orlando, FL 34747 Dear Paulo Toledo, Enclosed is the RF Wireless test report for compliance testing of the Brisa, EZYLOCK Electronic Controlled Door Lock as tested to the requirements of the FCC Part Part 2, 22(H), 24(E), 27(L), 27(M), 27(H), 27(F),. Thank you for using the services of Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these results or if Eurofins E&E can be of further service to you. Sincerely yours, Gary Chou Documentation Department Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. While use of the A2LA logo in this report reflects Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. accreditation under these programs, the report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by A2LA, or any agency of the Federal Government. This letter of transmittal is not a part of the attached report. Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. is part of the Eurofins Electrical & Electronics (E&E) global compliance network. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page ii of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager FCC Test Report Applicant name: BRISA AMERICA CORP Product: Electronic Controlled Door Lock Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE Applicant Address: 1420 Celebration Blvd., Suite 200 Orlando, FL 34747 Prepared By: Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 3162 Belick St. Santa Clara CA, 95054 HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page 3 of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Applicant name: BRISA AMERICA CORP Product: Electronic Controlled Door Lock Standard 47 CFR Part 2, 22(H), 24(E), 27(L), 27(M), 27(H), 27(F) Gary Chou Wireless Engineering Manager, Wireless Laboratory Engineering Statement: The measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures indicated, and the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the limits applicable. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements, and for the qualifications of all persons taking them. It is further stated that upon the basis of the measurements made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements of Part 22 Subpart H and Part 24 Subpart E and Part 27 Subpart L of the FCC Rules under normal use and maintenance. Eleazar Zuniga, Director, Wireless Laboratory HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page 4 of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Report Status Sheet Revision Report Date Reason for Revision  March 04, 2022 Initial Issue. HEADQUARTERS: 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230 • PHONE (410) 354-3300 • FAX (410) 354-3313 Report: WIR117103-FCC LTE © 2022, Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. ................................................. Page 5 of 24 Maryland | California | Texas www.metlabs.com DOC-WIR TEMP-FCC22-24-27-90-7-12-2021 – Rev 1 - Approved by DOC Manager Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Purpose of Test ................................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Equipment Information ........................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 B. References ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. Test Site .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 D. Measurement Uncertainty ................................................................................................................................... 4 E. Modifications ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Modifications to EUT .............................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.