2ANIRASTROA10Tablet

LUXPAD TABLET ADD: YangGuangGaoErFU Building,No 7008 SHENNAN Road, FuTian SHENZHEN, China TEL: 00861353424318 Fax: 0755-83255400 Email: [email protected] FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Dear Sir/Madam, We, LUXPAD TABLET, hereby authorize Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp.(Dongguan) to act as a laboratory for testing and test report generation for the f ollowing project(s): (Product description: Tablet, model name: ASTRO A10, FCC ID: 2ANIRASTROA10） The product only supports BT(GFSK, π/4-DQPSK, 8DPSK), BLE 1M, 2.4G WiFi:2412-2462MHz (802.11b/g/n ht20),5G WiFi:5150-5250MHz,5250-5350MHz, 5470-5725MHz,5725-5850MHz 802.11a/n ht20/ac vht20/n ht40/ac vht40/ac vht80),GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850/1900, WCDMA Band 2/4/5 , LTE Band 2 /4/5/7/12/17/66/71, FM(VHF band II: 65~108 MHz, o nly RX),GPS L1/BDS B1/ GLONASS G1/SBAS(1559-1610MHz) were actived in USA. We also certify that each unit manufactured, imported or marketed, as defined in the Federal Communications Commission's regulations will have affixed to it a label identical to that submitted for appr oval with this application. Sincerely, Signature: Printed Name: Rita Yu Title: Manager Date: 2026-09-15

ATTESTATION STATEMENT LUXPAD TABLET ADD: YangGuangGaoErFU Building,No 7008 SHENNAN Road, FuTian SHENZHEN, China TEL: 00861353424318 Fax: 0755-83255400 Email: [email protected] Date: 2026-09-15 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Ref: Attestation Statements Part 2.911(d)(5)(i), (ii) Filing FCC I D: 2ANIRASTROA10 Signed by (printed name): Rita Yu Title: Manager LUXPAD TABLET , certifies that the equipment for which authorization is sought is not “covered” equipment prohibited from receiving an equipment authorization pursuant to section 2.903 of the FCC rules. And LUXPAD TABLET , certifies that, as of the date of the filing of the application, the applicant is not identified on the Covered List as an entity producing “covered” equipment. LUXPAD TABLET, certifies that the equipment does not use Kaspersky's software information. Sincerely,

U.S. AGENT LETTER OF ATTESTATION Date: 2026-09-15 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Ref: Attestation Statements CFR 47 §2.911(d)(7) Filing FCC ID: 2ANIRASTROA10 LUXPAD TABLET certifies that, as of the date of the filing of the application, OC CONTINENTAL SOURCE INC is our designated U.S. agent for service of process for the above referenced FCC ID.LUXPAD TABLET accepts to maintain an agent for no less than one year after the grantee has terminated all marketing and importation or the conclusion of any Commission-related proceeding involving the equipment. OC CONTINENTAL SOURCE INC accepts, as of the date of the filing of the application, the obligation of the designated U.S. agent for service of process for the above referenced FCC ID. Designated U.S. Agent Information: Name: OC CONTINENTAL SOURCE INC Address:13772 GOLDEN WEST ST. UNIT. 618 WESTMINSTER, CA. 92683-3123 United States FRN:0033598186 Tel.: 714-862-5327 Email: [email protected] Signed by (printed name): sabah mus Signature: Applicant: LUXPAD TABLET Add: YangGuangGaoErFU Building,No 7008 SHENNAN Road, FuTian SHENZHEN, China FRN:0026750620 Tel: 00861353424318 Email:[email protected] Signed by (printed name): Rita Yu Signature:

QA-FR-170-B LUXPAD TABLET ADD: YangGuangGaoErFU Building,No 7008 SHENNAN Ro ad, FuTian SHENZHEN, China TEL: 00861353424318 Fax: 0755-83255400 Email: [email protected] FCC Authorization Date: 2026-07-26 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Subject: Agent Authorization To whom it may concern: We , LUXPAD TABLET, Hereby authorizes Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) to act on its behalf in all matters relating to application for Equipment authorization, including the signing of all documents relating to these matters. All acts carried out by Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) on our behalf shall have the same effect as our own action. We, the undersigned, hereby certify that we are not subject to a denial of federal benefits, that includes FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. 862. T his authorization is valid until further written notice from the applicant. Sincerely Yours, Client’s signature: Printed name: Rita Yu Title: Manager

QA-FR-1 72-A LUXPAD TABLET ADD: YangGuangGaoErFU Building,No 7008 SHENNAN Road, FuTian SHENZHEN, China TEL: 00861353424318 Fax: 0755-83255400 Email: [email protected] FCC Confidential Authorization Date: 2026-09-15 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 hereby requests long-term confidential treatment of information Subject: Confidentiality Request regarding application for certification of FCC ID: 2ANIRASTROA10 In accordance with Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, LUXPAD TABLET hereby requests long-term confidential treatment of information accompanying this application as outlined below: •Block Diagram •Schematics •Operation Description •Internal Photos •User’s Manual •External Photos • Parts List/Tune up procedure As well asshort-term (secrecy cycle:180 days) confidential treatment of information accompanying this •Test Set-up Photos The above materials contain proprietary and confidential information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these materials provides unjustified benefits to its competitors in the market. Sincerely, Signature: Printed Name: Rita Yu Title: Manager application as outlined below: • SOFTWARE SECURITY DESCRIPTION

label location

Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 APPENDIX D - PROBE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20

Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 APPENDIX E - DIPOLE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Report No.: 2602V17767E-20

Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 1 of 8 APPENDIX F - RETURN LOSS AND IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT D1750V2 - SN:1141 Extended Dipole Calibrations Referring to KDB 865664 D01, if dipoles are verified in return loss(< -20dB, within 20% of prior calibration), and in impedance(within 5 ohm of prior calibration), the annual calibration is not necessary and the calibration interval can be extended. Test Equipment Information: Equipment Model S/N Calibration Date Calibration Due Date Simulated Tissue Liquid Head HBBL600-10000V6 SL AAH U126 CA (Batch:250429-1) N/A N/A Twin SAM Twin SAM V5.0 1097 NCR NCR Network Analyzer E5071C MY46519680 2024/07/11 2025/07/10 Network Analyzer Calibration Kit 50 Ω 51026 NCR NCR Justification of the extended calibration D1750V2 - SN:1141 1750MHz Head Date of Measurement Return-Loss (dB) Delta (%) Real Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) Imaginary Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) 2024/6/17 (Cal. Report) -30.3 / 47.2 / -0.96 / 2025/6/15 (Extended) -30.7 1.32% 47.4 0.2 1.17 2.13 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 2 of 8 Dipole Verification Data> D1750V2 - SN:1141 (Date of Measurement: 2025/6/15) 1750MHz - Head Name Tilt Signature Calibrated By: Mark Dong SAR Engineer Approved By: Brave Lu SAR Supervisor Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 3 of 8 D1750V2 - SN:1141 Extended Dipole Calibrations Referring to KDB 865664 D01, if dipoles are verified in return loss(< -20dB, within 20% of prior calibration), and in impedance(within 5 ohm of prior calibration), the annual calibration is not necessary and the calibration interval can be extended. Test Equipment Information: Equipment Model S/N Calibration Date Calibration Due Date Simulated Tissue Liquid Head HBBL600-10000V6 SL AAH U126 CA (Batch:250429-1) N/A N/A Twin SAM Twin SAM V5.0 1097 NCR NCR Network Analyzer E5071C MY46519680 2026/04/14 2027/04/13 Network Analyzer Calibration Kit 50 Ω 51026 NCR NCR Justification of the extended calibration D1750V2 - SN:1141 1750MHz Head Date of Measurement Return-Loss (dB) Delta (%) Real Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) Imaginary Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) 2024/6/17 (Cal. Report) -30.3 / 47.2 / -0.96 / 2026/6/13 (Extended) -33.539 10.69 50.921 3.721 1.9138 2.8738 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 4 of 8 Dipole Verification Data> D1750V2 - SN:1141 (Date of Measurement: 2026/6/13) 1750MHz - Head Name Tilt Signature Calibrated By: Mikasa Mo SAR Engineer Approved By: Brave Lu SAR Supervisor Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 5 of 8 D2450V2 - SN:971 Extended Dipole Calibrations Referring to KDB 865664 D01, if dipoles are verified in return loss(< -20dB, within 20% of prior calibration), and in impedance(within 5 ohm of prior calibration), the annual calibration is not necessary and the calibration interval can be extended. Test Equipment Information: Equipment Model S/N Calibration Date Calibration Due Date Simulated Tissue Liquid Head HBBL600-10000V6 SL AAH U126 CA (Batch:250429-1) N/A N/A Twin SAM Twin SAM V5.0 1097 NCR NCR Network Analyzer E5071C MY46519680 2024/07/11 2025/07/10 Network Analyzer Calibration Kit 50 Ω 51026 NCR NCR Justification of the extended calibration D2450V2 - SN:971 2450MHz Head Date of Measurement Return-Loss (dB) Delta (%) Real Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) Imaginary Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) 2024/6/15 (Cal. Report) -23.0 / 52.3 / 6.84 / 2025/6/10 (Extended) -21.69 5.7% 47.66 4.64 7.72 -0.88 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 6 of 8 Dipole Verification Data> D2450V2 - SN:971 (Date of Measurement: 2025/6/10) 2450MHz - Head Name Tilt Signature Calibrated By: Mark Dong SAR Engineer Approved By: Brave Lu SAR Supervisor Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 7 of 8 D2450V2 - SN:971 Extended Dipole Calibrations Referring to KDB 865664 D01, if dipoles are verified in return loss(< -20dB, within 20% of prior calibration), and in impedance(within 5 ohm of prior calibration), the annual calibration is not necessary and the calibration interval can be extended. Test Equipment Information: Equipment Model S/N Calibration Date Calibration Due Date Simulated Tissue Liquid Head HBBL600-10000V6 SL AAH U126 CA (Batch:250429-1) N/A N/A Twin SAM Twin SAM V5.0 1097 NCR NCR Network Analyzer E5071C MY46519680 2026/04/14 2027/04/13 Network Analyzer Calibration Kit 50 Ω 51026 NCR NCR Justification of the extended calibration D2450V2 - SN:971 2450MHz Head Date of Measurement Return-Loss (dB) Delta (%) Real Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) Imaginary Impedance (ohm) Delta (ohm) 2024/6/15 (Cal. Report) -23.0 / 52.3 / 6.84 / 2026/6/13 (Extended) -24.202 5.23 53.748 1.448 5.1928 -1.6472 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page 8 of 8 Dipole Verification Data> D2450V2 - SN:971 (Date of Measurement: 2026/6/13) 2450MHz - Head Name Tilt Signature Calibrated By: Mikasa Mo SAR Engineer Approved By: Brave Lu SAR Supervisor

Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page1 / 16 APPENDIX B - SAR PLOTS Plot 1#: GSM 850 High DUT: Tablet; Type: ASTRO A10; Serial: 3QUE-1 Communication System: UID 0, Generic GPRS-2 slots (0); Frequency: 848.8 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:4 Medium parameters used: f = 848.8 MHz; σ = 0.932 S/m; ε r = 41.705; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:  Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7329; ConvF(10.41, 10.41, 10.41) @ 848.8 MHz; Calibrated: 2026/5/28  Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1562; Calibrated: 2026/1/12  Phantom: Twin SAM V5.0; Type: QD000P40CC; Serial: TP:1097  Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (4); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.14 (7501) Body Back/GSM 850 High/Area Scan (8x12x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.12 W/kg Body Back/GSM 850 High/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 31.05 V/m; Power Drift = -0.07 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.92 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.879 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.449 W/kg Smallest distance from peaks to all points 3 dB below = 8.6 mm Ratio of SAR at M2 to SAR at M1 = 47.4% Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.16 W/kg 0 dB = 1.16 W/kg = 0.64 dBW/kg Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page2 / 16 Plot 2#: PCS 1900 Low DUT: Tablet; Type: ASTRO A10; Serial: 3QUE-1 Communication System: UID 0, Generic GPRS-2 slots (0); Frequency: 1850.2 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:4 Medium parameters used: f = 1850.2 MHz; σ = 1.379 S/m; ε r = 41.151; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:  Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7329; ConvF(8.25, 8.25, 8.25) @ 1850.2 MHz; Calibrated: 2026/5/28  Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1562; Calibrated: 2026/1/12  Phantom: Twin SAM V5.0; Type: QD000P40CC; Serial: TP:1097  Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (4); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.14 (7501) Body Top/PCS 1900 Low/Area Scan (6x12x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.44 W/kg Body Top/PCS 1900 Low/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 16.38 V/m; Power Drift = -0.13 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 3.15 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 1.24 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.483 W/kg Smallest distance from peaks to all points 3 dB below = 8.8 mm Ratio of SAR at M2 to SAR at M1 = 40.1% Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.85 W/kg 0 dB = 1.85 W/kg = 2.67 dBW/kg Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page3 / 16 Plot 3#: WCDMA Band 2 Mid DUT: Tablet; Type: ASTRO A10; Serial: 3QUE-1 Communication System: UID 0, Generic WCDMA (0); Frequency: 1880 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 1880 MHz; σ = 1.408 S/m; ε r = 40.631; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:  Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7329; ConvF(8.25, 8.25, 8.25) @ 1880 MHz; Calibrated: 2026/5/28  Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1562; Calibrated: 2026/1/12  Phantom: Twin SAM V5.0; Type: QD000P40CC; Serial: TP:1097  Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (4); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.14 (7501) Body Back/WCDMA Band 2 Mid/Area Scan (8x12x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.870 W/kg Body Back/WCDMA Band 2 Mid/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 17.70 V/m; Power Drift = 0.16 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.75 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.733 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.351 W/kg Smallest distance from peaks to all points 3 dB below = 8.6 mm Ratio of SAR at M2 to SAR at M1 = 43.1% Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.989 W/kg 0 dB = 0.989 W/kg = -0.05 dBW/kg Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page4 / 16 Plot 4#: WCDMA Band 4 Mid DUT: Tablet; Type: ASTRO A10; Serial: 3QUE-1 Communication System: UID 0, Generic WCDMA (0); Frequency: 1732.6 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 1732.6 MHz; σ = 1.374 S/m; ε r = 39.226; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:  Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7329; ConvF(8.57, 8.57, 8.57) @ 1732.6 MHz; Calibrated: 2026/5/28  Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1562; Calibrated: 2026/1/12  Phantom: Twin SAM V5.0; Type: QD000P40CC; Serial: TP:1097  Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (4); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.14 (7501) Body Top/WCDMA Band 4 Mid/Area Scan (6x13x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.12 W/kg Body Top/WCDMA Band 4 Mid/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 19.96 V/m; Power Drift = 0.05 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.91 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 1.23 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.519 W/kg Smallest distance from peaks to all points 3 dB below = 9.4 mm Ratio of SAR at M2 to SAR at M1 = 43.8% Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.84 W/kg 0 dB = 1.84 W/kg = 2.65 dBW/kg Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page5 / 16 Plot 5#: WCDMA Band 5 Mid DUT: Tablet; Type: ASTRO A10; Serial: 3QUE-1 Communication System: UID 0, Generic WCDMA (0); Frequency: 836.6 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 836.6 MHz; σ = 0.926 S/m; ε r = 41.817; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section DASY5 Configuration:  Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7329; ConvF(10.41, 10.41, 10.41) @ 836.6 MHz; Calibrated: 2026/5/28  Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)  Electronics: DAE4 Sn1562; Calibrated: 2026/1/12  Phantom: Twin SAM V5.0; Type: QD000P40CC; Serial: TP:1097  Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (4); SEMCAD X Version 14.6.14 (7501) Body Back/WCDMA Band 5 Mid/Area Scan (8x12x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.780 W/kg Body Back/WCDMA Band 5 Mid/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 25.02 V/m; Power Drift = 0.12 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 1.44 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.654 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.331 W/kg Smallest distance from peaks to all points 3 dB below = 10.1 mm Ratio of SAR at M2 to SAR at M1 = 48.9% Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.841 W/kg 0 dB = 0.841 W/kg = -0.75 dBW/kg Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Page6 / 16 …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Report Template Version: FCC SAR-V1.0 Page 1 of 83 FCC SAR TEST REPORT Applicant: LUXPAD TABLET Address: YangGuangGaoErFU Building,No 7008 SHENNAN Road, FuTian SHENZHEN, China Product Name: Tablet F C C I D : 2ANIRASTROA10 Standard(s): 47 CFR Part 2(2.1093) Report Number: 2602V17767E-20 Report Date: 2026/09/05 The above device has been tested and found compliant with the requirement of the relevantstandards by Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan). Reviewed By: Rocky Xiao Approved By: Brave Lu Title: RF Supervisor Title: SAR Supervisor Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) No.12, Pulong East 1 st Road, Tangxia Town, Dongguan, Guangdong, China Tel: +86-769-86858888 Fax: +86-769-86858891 www.baclcorp.com.cn Note: The information marked ▲ is provided by the applicant, the laboratory is not responsible for its authenticity and this information can affect the validity of the result in the test report. Unless otherwise stated the results shown in this test report refer only to the sample(s) tested. This report cannot be reproduced except in full, without prior written approval of the Company. This report is valid only with a valid digital signature. The digital signature may be available only under the Adobe software above version 7.0. This report may contain data that are not covered by the accreditation scope and shall be marked with ★.This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the U.S. Government.Each test item follows the test standard(s) without deviation. Report Template Version: FCC SAR-V1.0 Page 2 of 83 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 SAR TEST RESULTS SUMMARY Mode Max. Reported SAR Level(s) (W/kg) Limit (W/kg) GSM 850 1g Body SAR 0.91 1.6 PCS 1900 1g Body SAR 1.27 WCDMA Band 2 1g Body SAR 0.76 WCDMA Band 4 1g Body SAR 1.28 WCDMA Band 5 1g Body SAR 0.71 LTE Band 2 1g Body SAR 1.15 LTE Band 5 1g Body SAR 0.97 LTE Band 7 1g Body SAR 1.08 LTE Band 12&17 1g Body SAR 0.80 LTE Band 66&4 1g Body SAR 1.16 LTE Band 71 1g Body SAR 0.95 WLAN 2.4G 1g Body SAR 0.33 WLAN 5.2G 1g Body SAR 0.37 WLAN 5.3G 1g Body SAR 0.32 WLAN 5.6G 1g Body SAR 0.36 WLAN 5.8G 1g Body SAR 0.35 Simultaneous 1g Body SAR 1.53 (Hotspot) Report Template Version: FCC SAR-V1.0 Page 3 of 83 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 Applicable Standards FCC 47 CFR part 2.1093 Radiofrequency radiation exposure evaluation: portable devices IEEE1528:2013 IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques RF Exposure Procedures: TCB WorkshopApril2019 KDB procedures KDB 447498 D01 General RF Exposure Guidance v06 KDB 865664 D01 SAR Measurement 100 MHz to 6 GHz v01r04 KDB 865664 D02 RF Exposure Reporting v01r02 KDB 941225 D01 3G SAR Procedures v03r01 KDB 941225 D05 SAR for LTE Devices v02r05 KDB 941225 D06 Hotspot Mode v02r01 KDB 616217 D04 SAR for laptop and tablets v01r02 KDB 248227 D01 802.11 Wi-Fi SAR v02r02 Note: This wireless device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure limits specified in FCC 47 CFR part 2.1093 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in IEEE 1528-2013 and RF exposure KDB procedures. The results and statements contained in this report pertain only to the device(s) evaluated. Report Template Version: FCC SAR-V1.0 Page 4 of 83 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) Report No.: 2602V17767E-20 CONTENTS SAR TEST RESULTS SUMMARY ·································································· 2 DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY ································································ 6 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ······································································· 7 1.1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FOR EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) ······································ 7 2. REFERENCE, STANDARDS, AND GUIDELINES ··········································· 8 2.1 SAR LIMITS ···································································································· 8 2.2 TEST FACILITY ································································································ 9 3. DESCRIPTION OF TEST SYSTEM ···························································· 10 4. EQUIPMENT LIST AND CALIBRATION ··················································· 15 4.1 EQUIPMENTS LIST & CALIBRATION INFORMATION ················································· 15 5. SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION ········································ 16 5.1 LIQUID VERIFICATION ····················································································· 16 5.2 LIQUID VERIFICATION RESULTS ········································································ 16 5.3 SYSTEM ACCURACY VERIFICATION ···································································· 19 5.4 SYSTEM ACCURACY CHECK RESULTS ·································································· 19 5.5 SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION DATA ································································· 20 6. EUT TEST STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY ·········································· 28 6.1 TEST POSITIONS FOR BODY-WORN AND OTHER CONFIGURATIONS ······························· 28 6.2 TEST DISTANCE FOR SAR EVALUATION ······························································· 28 6.3 SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURE ········································································· 29 7. CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT ······································ 30 7.1 TEST PROCEDURE ·························································································· 30 7.2 RADIO CONFIGURATION ·················································································· 30 7.3 MAXIMUM TARGET OUT…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Report Template Version: FCC-WiFi5-Client-V2.1 Page 1 of 143 TEST REPORT Applicant: LUXPAD TABLET Address: YangGuangGaoErFU Building,No 7008 SHENNAN Road, FuTian SHENZHEN, China Product Name: Tablet FCC ID: 2ANIRASTROA10 Standard(s): 47 CFR Part 15, Subpart E(15.407) ANSI C63.10-2020 KDB 789033 D02 General U-NII Test Procedures New Rules v02r01 Report Number: 2602V17767E-RF-00G Report Date: 2026/9/11 The above device has been tested and found compliant with the requirement of the relevant standards by Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan). Reviewed By: Alice Tan Approved By: Pedro Yun Title: RF Engineer Title: RF Supervisor Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) No.12, Pulong East 1 st Road, Tangxia Town, Dongguan, Guangdong, China Tel: +86-769-86858888 Fax: +86-769-86858891 www.baclcorp.com.cn Note: The information marked ▲ is provided by the applicant, the laboratory is not responsible for its authenticity and this information can affect the validity of the result in the test report. Unless otherwise stated the results shown in this test report refer only to the sample(s) tested. This report cannot be reproduced except in full, without prior written approval of the Company. This report is valid only with a valid digital signature. The digital signature may be available only under the Adobe software above version 7.0. This report may contain data that are not covered by the accreditation scope and shall be marked with ★.This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the U.S. Government. Each test item follows the test standard(s) without deviation. Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Dongguan) Report No.: 2602V17767E-RF-00G Report Template Version: FCC-WiFi5-Client-V2.1 Page 2 of 143 CONTENTS DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY ······································································· 4 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ·············································································· 5 1.1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION FOR EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) ·············································· 5 1.2 ACCESSORY INFORMATION·························································································· 5 1.3 ANTENNA INFORMATION DETAIL▲ ··············································································· 6 1.4 EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS ······················································································· 6 2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ········································································ 7 3. DESCRIPTION OF TEST CONFIGURATION ······················································· 8 3.1 OPERATION FREQUENCY DETAIL ·················································································· 8 3.2 EUT OPERATION CONDITION ······················································································· 9 3.3 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT LIST AND DETAILS ······································································ 10 3.4 SUPPORT CABLE LIST AND DETAILS ············································································· 11 3.5 BLOCK DIAGRAM OF TEST SETUP ··············································································· 11 3.6 TEST FACILITY ······································································································· 13 3.7 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ··················································································· 13 4. REQUIREMENTS AND TEST PROCEDURES ····················································· 14 4.1 AC LINE CONDUCTED EMISSIONS ··············································································· 14 4.1.1 Applicable Standard ········································································································ 14 4.1.2 EUT Setup ··················································································································· 15 4.1.3 EMI Test Receiver Setup ·································································································· 15 4.1.4 Test Procedure ·············································································································· 16 4.1.5 Corrected Amplitude & Margin Calculation ············································································ 16 4.1.6 Test Result ··················································································································· 16 4.2 RADIATION SPURIOUS EMISSIONS ··············································································· 17 4.2.1 Applicable Standard ········································································································ 17 4.2.2 EUT Setup ··················································································································· 18 4.2.3 EMI Test Receiver & Spectrum Analyzer Setup ······································································· 20 4.2.4 Test Procedure ·············································································································· 20 4.2.5 Corrected Result & Margin Calculation ···································································…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.