Text extracted from the exhibit documents filed with the FCC. Open a document above to read the original.
Meadow SF, Inc 2026/7/11 Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 914 West Patapsco Avenue Baltimore, MD 21230 RE: Attestation Statements Part 2.911(d)(5)(i) request for 2BW69MEADOW1 [Meadow SF, Inc] (“the applicant”) certifies that the equipment for which authorization is sought is not “covered” equipment prohibited from receiving an equipment authorization pursuant to section 2.903 of the FCC rules. We also certify that, as of the date of the filing of the application, the equipment does not utilize cyber-security or anti-virus software from Kaspersky Lab, Inc, or any of its successors and assignees, which is also on the “covered list”. Sincerely, (Applicant signature) (Applicant printed name) Shreyas Narlanka (Title)Manager (Company) Meadow SF, Inc Meadow SF, Inc 2026/7/11 Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 914 West Patapsco Avenue Baltimore, MD 21230 RE: Attestation Statements Part 2.911(d)(5)(ii) request for2BW69MEADOW1 [Meadow SF, Inc] (“the applicant”) certifies that, as of the date of the filing of the application, the applicant is not identified on the Covered List as an entity producing “covered” equipment. Sincerely, (Applicant signature) (Applicant printed name) Shreyas Narlanka (Title)Manager (Company) Meadow SF, Inc
A#esta(on Statements 2026/8/19 TO: Federal Communica(ons Commission Authoriza(on and Evalua(on Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046, USA RE: A/esta4on Statements Part 2.911(d)(7) request for (FCC ID: 2BW69MEADOW1) (Meadow SF, Inc), the undersigned, hereby authorize Meadow SF, Inc to act as our designated U.S. agent for service of process, (Meadow SF, Inc) accepts to maintain an agent for no less than one year aNer the grantee has terminated all marke(ng and importa(on or the conclusion of any Commission-related proceeding involving the equipment. Meadow SF, Inc accepts the responsibility to act as designated U.S. agent for service of process. Applicant Informa4on: Company Name: Meadow SF, Inc Contact Name: Shreyas Narlanka Address: 17169 NE 37th Pl, Bellevue, WA 98008 FRN: 0038670469 Telephone No: +1 (510) 200-8646 Email: [email protected] Signature [name] U.S. Agent Informa4on: Company Name: Meadow SF, Inc Address: 17169 NE 37th Pl, Bellevue, WA 98008 FRN: 0038670469 Contact Name: Shreyas Narlanka Telephone No: +1 (510) 200-8646 Email: [email protected] Signature [Print name]
Please produce a letter on your company letterhead with the following information. The letter must be submitted in PDF form. 2026/8/19 Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 914 West Patapsco Avenue Baltimore, MD 21230 RE: CONFIDENTIALITY REQUEST FOR (Meadow Companion / Companion) To Whom It May Concern: This letter serves as an official request for confidentiality under sections 0.457 and 0.459 of CFR 47. We have requested that the • Schematic Diagram • Block Diagram • Part List / BOM List / PCB Layout • Operational Description • Tune-up Procedure • FCC Software Configuration Control Declaration • FCC Software Security Requirements for UNII devices required to be submitted with this application be permanently withheld from public review. Above mentioned document contains detailed system and equipment description are considered as proprietary information in operation of the equipment. The public disclosure of above documents might be harmful to our company and would give competitor an unfair advantage in the market. It is our understanding that all measurement test reports, FCC ID label format and correspondent during certification review process cannot be granted as confidential documents and those information will be available for public review once the grant of equipment authorization is issued. Please contact me if there is any information you may need. Sincerely, (Signature) FCC ID:2BW69MEADOW1 (Print name) Shreyas Narlanka (Title)Manager (Company) Meadow SF, Inc
Please produce a letter on your company letterhead with the following information. The letter must be submitted in PDF form. 2026/8/19 Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 914 West Patapsco Avenue Baltimore, MD 21230 RE: LETTER OF AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: We, the undersigned, hereby authorize Shenzhen NTEK Testing Technology Co., Ltd.( No. 24 Xinfa East Road, Xiangshan Community, Xinqiao Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China) to act on our behalf in all matters relating to application for equipment authorization, including the signing of all documents relating to these matters. We also hereby certify that no party to the application authorized hereunder is subject to the denial of benefits, including FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C.853(a). This agreement expires one year from the current date. Sincerely, (Signature) (Print name) Shreyas Narlanka (Title)Manager (Company) Meadow SF, Inc
Please produce a letter on your company letterhead with the following information. The letter must be submitted in PDF form. (2026/8/19) External photos Internal photos User’s manual These documents contain detailed system and equipment descriptions and related information about the product, which < Meadow SF, Inc > considers to be proprietary, confidential, and a custom design and otherwise, would not release to the general public. Since this design is a basis from which future technological products will evolve, < Meadow SF, Inc > feels that this information would be of benefit to its competitors, and that the disclosure of the information in these documents would give our competitors an unfair advantage in the market. Please contact me if there is any information you may need. Sincerely, (Signature) (Print name) Shreyas Narlanka (Title)Manager (Company) Meadow SF, Inc Eurofins Electrical and Electronic Testing NA, Inc. 914 West Patapsco Avenue Baltimore, MD 21230 FCC ID:2BW69MEADOW1 RE: Short Term Confidentiality Request For(Meadow Companion / Companion) To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with sections 0.457 and 0.459 of CFR 47, < Meadow SF, Inc >. requests short-term Confidentiality of following sections of this application for a period of 180 days after grant is issued. Test setup photos
FCC ID Number Inquiry Guide 1. Device power on 2. When the device displays the word "meadow", first press and hold the top button, then press and hold the shutter button. 3. This will take you to the Factory mode password screen; the FCCID is in the upper right corner.
Page 1 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E FCC SAR EVALUATION REPORT In accordance with the requirements of FCC 47 CFR Part 2(2.1093) and IEEE Std 1528-2013 Product Name: Meadow Companion Brand Name: Meadow Model Name: Companion Family Model: N/A Report No.: N26070210202E FCC ID: 2BW69MEADOW1 Prepared for Meadow SF, Inc 17169 NE 37th Pl, Bellevue, WA 98008 Prepared by Shenzhen NTEK Testing Technology Co., Ltd. No. 24 Xinfa East Road, Xiangshan Community, Xinqiao Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China Tel. 0755-23200050 Website: http://www.ntek.org.cn Page 2 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E TEST RESULT CERTIFICATION Applicant’s name ................. : Meadow SF, Inc Address ................................. : 17169 NE 37th Pl, Bellevue, WA 98008 Manufacturer's Name .......... : Meadow SF, Inc Address ................................. : 17169 NE 37th Pl, Bellevue, WA 98008 Product description Product name ........................ : Meadow Companion Brand Name ......................... : Meadow Model and/or type reference .............................. : Companion Family Model ......................... : N/A Standards ............................. : FCC 47 CFR Part 2(2.1093) IEEE Std 1528-2013 Published RF exposure KDB procedures This device described above has been tested by Shenzhen NTEK. In accordance with the measurement methods and procedures specified in IEEE Std 1528-2013 and KDB 865664 D01. Testing has shown that this device is capable of compliance with localized specific absorption rate (SAR) specified in FCC 47 CFR Part 2(2.1093). The test results in this report apply only to the tested sample of the stated device/equipment. Other similar device/equipment will not necessarily produce the same results due to production tolerance and measurement uncertainties. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Shenzhen NTEK, this document may be altered or revised by Shenzhen NTEK, personal only, and shall be noted in the revision of the document. Test Sample Number ............................ S2607070412-1# Date of Test Date (s) of performance of tests ............. : July. 07, 2026~July. 21, 2026 Date of Issue .......................................... : Aug. 14, 2026 Test Result .............................................. : Pass Prepared By : Reviewed By : Approved By : Owen Xiao (Project Engineer) Aaron Cheng (Supervisor) Alex Li (Manager) Page 3 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E ※ ※ Revision History ※ ※ REV. DESCRIPTION ISSUED DATE REMARK Rev.1.0 Initial Test Report Release Aug. 14, 2026 Owen Xiao Page 4 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. General Information .......................................................................................... 6 1.1. RF exposure limits .................................................................................. 6 1.2. Statement of Compliance ....................................................................... 7 1.3. EUT Description ..................................................................................... 7 1.4. Test specification(s) .............................................................................. 10 1.5. Ambient Condition ............................................................................... 10 1.6. Facilities And Accreditations ................................................................ 10 1.6.1. Facilities ......................................................................................... 10 1.6.2. Laboratory Accreditations And Listings .......................................... 10 2. SAR Measurement System ............................................................................... 11 2.1. SATIMO SAR Measurement Set-up Diagram ......................................... 11 2.2. Robot ................................................................................................... 12 2.3. E-Field Probe ........................................................................................ 13 2.3.1. E-Field Probe Calibration ................................................................ 13 2.4. SAM phantoms .................................................................................... 14 2.4.1. Technical Data ................................................................................ 15 2.5. Device Holder ...................................................................................... 16 2.6. Test Equipment List .............................................................................. 17 3. SAR Measurement Procedures ........................................................................ 19 3.1. Power Reference.................................................................................. 19 3.2. Area scan & Zoom scan ........................................................................ 19 3.3. Description of interpolation/extrapolation scheme ............................. 21 3.4. Volumetric Scan ................................................................................... 21 3.5. Power Drift .......................................................................................... 21 4. System Verification Procedure ......................................................................... 22 4.1. Tissue Verification ................................................................................ 22 4.1.1. Tissue Dielectric Parameter Check Results ..................................... 23 4.2. System Verification Procedure ............................................................. 24 4.2.1. System Verification Results ............................................................ 25 5. SAR Measurement variability and uncertainty ................................................. 26 5.1. SAR measurement variability ............................................................... 26 5.2. SAR measurement uncertainty .................................................…
Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.
Page 71 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Back Side Repeated 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(1,24) 0.771 0.462 -1.24 24.65 25.00 0.836 2026/7/14 Back Side Repeated 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(1,24) 0.786 0.475 0.98 23.59 25.00 1.087 2026/7/14 Back Side Repeated 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(1,24) 0.751 0.429 0.74 23.76 25.00 0.999 2026/7/14 50%RB Front Side 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(25,12) 0.471 0.275 -3.64 23.63 24.00 0.513 2026/7/14 Back Side 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(25,12) 0.707 0.435 0.34 23.63 24.00 0.770 2026/7/14 Left Side 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(25,12) 0.197 0.128 1.96 23.63 24.00 0.215 2026/7/14 Right Side 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(25,12) 0.222 0.132 4.95 23.63 24.00 0.242 2026/7/14 Bottom Side 20525/836.5 10M QPSK(25,12) 0.211 0.132 -1.93 23.63 24.00 0.230 2026/7/14 100%RB Back Side 20525/836.5 20M QPSK(100,0) 0.621 0.422 -1.54 22.55 23.00 0.689 2026/7/14 NOTE: 1.Hotspot SAR test results of LTE Band 5 2.Tested by : Max Zhou 10.1.9. SAR measurement Result of LTE Band 7 Test Position of Body-W orn with 5mm Test channel /Freq. Test Mode SAR Value (W/kg) Power Drift (±5%) Conducted power (dBm) Tune-up power (dBm) Scaled SAR 1g (W/Kg) Date Plot 1g 10g 1RB Front Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.686 0.359 1.94 24.86 25.00 0.708 2026/7/11 Back Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.601 0.321 -3.62 24.86 25.00 0.621 2026/7/11 50%RB Front Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(50,24) 0.633 0.339 -3.03 23.74 24.00 0.672 2026/7/11 Back 21100/2535 20M 0.521 0.286 -1.29 23.74 24.00 0.553 2026/7/11 Page 72 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Side QPSK(50,24) NOTE: Body-Worn SAR test results of LTE Band 7 Test Position of Hotspot with 5mm Test channel /Freq. Test Mode SAR Value (W/kg) Power Drift (±5%) Conducted power (dBm) Tune-up power (dBm) Scaled SAR 1g (W/Kg) Date Plot 1-g 10-g 1RB Front Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.686 0.359 1.94 24.86 25.00 0.708 2026/7/11 Back Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.601 0.321 -3.62 24.86 25.00 0.621 2026/7/11 Left Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.525 0.272 -1.98 24.86 25.00 0.542 2026/7/11 Right Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.131 0.070 1.47 24.86 25.00 0.135 2026/7/11 Bottom Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.961 0.513 0.25 24.86 25.00 0.992 2026/7/11 14# Bottom Side 20850/2510 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.891 0.452 2.33 24.83 25.00 0.927 2026/7/11 Bottom Side 21350/2560 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.825 0.432 1.86 24.86 25.00 0.852 2026/7/11 Bottom Side Repeated 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.943 0.492 -1.25 24.86 25.00 0.974 2026/7/11 Bottom Side Repeated 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.882 0.435 -2.64 24.83 25.00 0.917 2026/7/11 Bottom Side Repeated 21100/2535 20M QPSK(1,0) 0.806 0.421 -0.84 24.86 25.00 0.832 2026/7/11 50%RB Front Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(50,24) 0.633 0.339 -3.03 23.74 24.00 0.672 2026/7/11 Back Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(50,24) 0.521 0.286 -1.29 23.74 24.00 0.553 2026/7/11 Left Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(50,24) 0.472 0.240 -0.20 23.74 24.00 0.501 2026/7/11 Right Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(50,24) 0.118 0.060 -0.64 23.74 24.00 0.125 2026/7/11 Bottom Side 21100/2535 20M QPSK(50,24) 0.687 0.324 -2.36 23.74 24.00 0.729 2026/7/11 100%RB Page 73 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Bottom Side Repeated 21100/2535 20M QPSK(100,0) 0.661 0.301 -1.62 23.63 24.00 0.720 2026/7/11 NOTE: 1.Hotspot SAR test results of LTE Band 7 2. Tested by : Max Zhou 10.1.10. SAR measurement Result of LTE Band 12 Test Position of Body-Worn with 5mm Test channel /Freq. Test Mode SAR Value (W/kg) Power Drift (±5%) Conducted power (dBm) Tune-up power (dBm) Scaled SAR 1g (W/Kg) Date Plot 1-g 10-g 1RB Front Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(1,0) 0.300 0.174 -2.35 24.19 24.50 0.322 2026/7/07 Back Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(1,0) 0.456 0.275 -2.60 24.19 24.50 0.490 2026/7/07 15# 50%RB Front Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(25,24) 0.171 0.088 -1.73 22.82 23.00 0.178 2026/7/07 Back Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(25,24) 0.270 0.138 0.82 22.82 23.00 0.281 2026/7/07 NOTE: Body-Worn SAR test results of LTE Band 12 Test Position of Hotspot with 5mm Test channel /Freq. Test Mode SAR Value (W/kg) Power Drift (±5%) Conducted power (dBm) Tune-up power (dBm) Scaled SAR 1g (W/Kg) Date Plot 1-g 10-g 1RB Front Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(1,0) 0.300 0.174 -2.35 24.19 24.50 0.322 2026/7/07 Back Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(1,0) 0.456 0.275 -2.60 24.19 24.50 0.490 2026/7/07 15# Left Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(1,0) 0.132 0.078 1.70 24.19 24.50 0.142 2026/7/07 Right Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(1,0) 0.150 0.089 -2.76 24.19 24.50 0.161 2026/7/07 Bottom Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(1,0) 0.138 0.080 3.32 24.19 24.50 0.148 2026/7/07 50%RB Page 74 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Front Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(25,24) 0.171 0.088 -1.73 22.82 23.00 0.178 2026/7/07 Back Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(25,24) 0.270 0.138 0.82 22.82 23.00 0.281 2026/7/07 Left Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(25,24) 0.070 0.040 -4.12 22.82 23.00 0.073 2026/7/07 Right Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(25,24) 0.076 0.053 -0.83 22.82 23.00 0.079 2026/7/07 Bottom Side 23095/707.5 10M QPSK(25,24) 0.070 0.046 2.34 22.82 23.00 0.073 2026/7/07 NOTE:1. Hotspot SAR test results of LTE Band 12 2. Tested by : Jack Peng 10.1.11. SAR measurement Result of LTE Band 13 Test Position of Body-Worn with 5mm Test channel /Freq. Test Mode SAR Value (W/kg) Power Drift (±5%) Conducted power (dBm) Tune-up power (dBm) Scaled SAR 1g (W/Kg) Date Plot 1-g 10-g 1RB Front Side 23230/782 10M QPSK(1,24) 0.348 0.215 0.35 24.32 24.50 0.363 2026/7/07 Back Side 23230/782 10M QPSK(1,24) 0.546 0.341 -3.36 24.32 24.50 0.569 2026/7/07 16# 50%RB Front Side 23230/782 10M QPSK(25,12) 0.323 0.195 -1.99 23.26 23.50 0.341 2026/7/07 Back Side 23230/782 10M QPSK(25,12) 0.413 0.307 -2.36 23.26 23.50 0.436 2026/7/07 NOTE: Body-Worn SAR test results of LTE Band 13 Test Position of Hotspot with 5mm Test channel /Freq. Test Mode SAR Value (W/kg) Power Drift (±5%) Conducted power (dBm) Tune-up power (dBm) Scaled SAR 1g (W/Kg) Date Plot 1-g 10-g 1RB Front Side 23230/782 10M QPSK(1,24) 0.348 0.215 0.35 24.32 24.50 0.363 2026/7/07 Back 23230/782 10M 0.546 0.341 -3.36 24.32 24.50 0.569 2026/7/07 16# Page 75 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Side QP…
Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.
Page 149 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E 18# SAR Measurement at LTE band 25 (Body, Validation Plane) Date of measurement: 15/7/2026 A. Experimental conditions. Probe 3423-EPGO-426 ConvF 2.63 Area Scan dx=15mm dy=15mm, Complete Zoom Scan 5x5x7,dx=8mm dy=8mm dz=5.0mm,Complete Phantom Validation plane Device Position Body Band LTE band 25 Signal LTE FDD Channel Center [EARFCN] / Channel Center [MHz] Middle (26365)/ frequency 1882.50 Mhz Cell Bandwidth 20 Mhz Modulation SC-OFDM - QPSK Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 1882.50 B. Permitivity Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 1882.50 Relative permitivity (real part) 39.20 Relative permitivity (imaginary part) 13.93 Conductivity (S/m) 1.46 C. SAR Surface and Volume SURFACE SAR VOLUME SAR Maximum location: X=-10.00, Y=-12.00 ; SAR Peak: 1.29 W/kg D. SAR 1g & 10g SAR 10g (W/Kg) 0.584 SAR 1g (W/Kg) 0.918 Variation (%) 0.69 Horizontal validation criteria: minimum distance (mm) 22.63 Vertical validation criteria: SAR ratio M2/M1 (%) 71.28 E. Z Axis Scan Z (mm) 0.00 4.00 9.00 14.00 19.00 24.00 29.00 SAR (W/Kg) 1.257 0.949 0.676 0.452 0.352 0.253 0.190 Page 150 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E F. 3D Image 3D screen shot Hot spot position Page 151 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E 19# SAR Measurement at LTE band 26 (Body, Validation Plane) Date of measurement: 14/7/2026 A. Experimental conditions. Probe 3423-EPGO-426 ConvF 2.32 Area Scan dx=15mm dy=15mm, Complete Zoom Scan 5x5x7,dx=8mm dy=8mm dz=5.0mm,Complete Phantom Validation plane Device Position Body Band LTE band 26 Signal LTE FDD Channel Center [EARFCN] / Channel Center [MHz] Middle (26740)/ frequency 819.00 Mhz Cell Bandwidth 10 Mhz Modulation SC-OFDM - QPSK Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 819.00 B. Permitivity Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 819.00 Relative permitivity (real part) 42.20 Relative permitivity (imaginary part) 20.08 Conductivity (S/m) 0.91 C. SAR Surface and Volume SURFACE SAR VOLUME SAR Maximum location: X=7.00, Y=-10.00 ; SAR Peak: 0.43 W/kg D. SAR 1g & 10g SAR 10g (W/Kg) 0.201 SAR 1g (W/Kg) 0.301 Variation (%) 2.44 Horizontal validation criteria: minimum distance (mm) 11.52 Vertical validation criteria: SAR ratio M2/M1 (%) 54.28 E. Z Axis Scan Z (mm) 0.00 4.00 9.00 14.00 19.00 24.00 29.00 SAR (W/Kg) 0.474 0.314 0.194 0.195 0.124 0.102 0.076 Page 152 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E F. 3D Image 3D screen shot Hot spot position Page 153 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E 20# SAR Measurement at LTE band 26 (Body, Validation Plane) Date of measurement: 14/7/2026 A. Experimental conditions. Probe 3423-EPGO-426 ConvF 2.32 Area Scan dx=15mm dy=15mm, Complete Zoom Scan 5x5x7,dx=8mm dy=8mm dz=5.0mm,Complete Phantom Validation plane Device Position Body Band LTE band 26 Signal LTE FDD Channel Center [EARFCN] / Channel Center [MHz] Middle (26865)/ frequency 831.50 Mhz Cell Bandwidth 15 Mhz Modulation SC-OFDM - QPSK Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 831.50 B. Permitivity Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 831.50 Relative permitivity (real part) 41.99 Relative permitivity (imaginary part) 20.09 Conductivity (S/m) 0.93 C. SAR Surface and Volume SURFACE SAR VOLUME SAR Maximum location: X=6.00, Y=-12.00 ; SAR Peak: 1.36 W/kg D. SAR 1g & 10g SAR 10g (W/Kg) 0.342 SAR 1g (W/Kg) 0.669 Variation (%) -1.93 Horizontal validation criteria: minimum distance (mm) 13.18 Vertical validation criteria: SAR ratio M2/M1 (%) 56.20 E. Z Axis Scan Z (mm) 0.00 4.00 9.00 14.00 19.00 24.00 29.00 SAR (W/Kg) 1.383 0.889 0.541 0.464 0.330 0.259 0.195 Page 154 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E F. 3D Image 3D screen shot Hot spot position Page 155 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E 21# SAR Measurement at LTE band 41 (Body, Validation Plane) Date of measurement: 11/7/2026 A. Experimental conditions. Probe 3423-EPGO-426 ConvF 2.65 Area Scan dx=12mm dy=12mm, Complete Zoom Scan 7x7x7,dx=5mm dy=5mm dz=5.0mm,Complete Phantom Validation plane Device Position Body Band LTE band 41 Signal LTE TDD Channel Center [EARFCN] / Channel Center [MHz] Middle (40620)/ frequency 2593.00 Mhz Cell Bandwidth 20 Mhz Modulation SC-OFDM - QPSK Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 2593.00 B. Permitivity Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 2593.00 Relative permitivity (real part) 39.40 Relative permitivity (imaginary part) 13.87 Conductivity (S/m) 2.00 C. SAR Surface and Volume SURFACE SAR VOLUME SAR Maximum location: X=-1.00, Y=14.00 ; SAR Peak: 0.77 W/kg D. SAR 1g & 10g SAR 10g (W/Kg) 0.275 SAR 1g (W/Kg) 0.509 Variation (%) 3.58 Horizontal validation criteria: minimum distance (mm) 10.00 Vertical validation criteria: SAR ratio M2/M1 (%) 67.48 E. Z Axis Scan Z (mm) 0.00 4.00 9.00 14.00 19.00 24.00 29.00 SAR (W/Kg) 0.729 0.558 0.373 0.262 0.147 0.095 0.062 Page 156 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E F. 3D Image 3D screen shot Hot spot position Page 157 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E 22# SAR Measurement at LTE band 66 (Body, Validation Plane) Date of measurement: 8/7/2026 A. Experimental conditions. Probe 3423-EPGO-426 ConvF 1.47 Area Scan dx=15mm dy=15mm, Complete Zoom Scan 5x5x7,dx=8mm dy=8mm dz=5.0mm,Complete Phantom Validation plane Device Position Body Band LTE band 66 Signal LTE FDD Channel Center [EARFCN] / Channel Center [MHz] Middle (132322)/ frequency 1745.00 Mhz Cell Bandwidth 20 Mhz Modulation SC-OFDM - QPSK Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 1745.00 B. Permitivity Middle TX Frequency (MHz) 1745.00 Relative permitivity (real part) 40.17 Relative permitivity (imaginary part) 13.81 Conductivity (S/m) 1.34 C. SAR Surface and Volume SURFACE SAR VOLUME SAR Maximum location: X=3.00, Y=-14.00 ; SAR Peak: 1.15 W/kg D. SAR 1g & 10g SAR 10g (W/Kg) 0.567 SAR 1g (W/Kg) 0.866 Variation (%) -2.77 Horizontal validation criteria: minimum distance (mm) 17.89 Vertical validation criteria: SAR ratio M2/M1 (%) 78.47 E. Z Axis Scan Z (mm) 0.00 4.00 9.00 14.00 19.00 24.00 29.00 SAR (W/Kg) 1.278 0.884 0.565 0.489 0.334 0.206 0.168 Page 158 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E F. 3D Image 3D screen shot Hot spot position Page 159 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E 23# SAR Measurement at LTE band 71 (Body, Validation Plane) Date of measurement:…
Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.
Page 190 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 191 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 192 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 193 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 194 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 195 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 196 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 197 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 198 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 199 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 200 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 201 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 202 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 203 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 204 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 205 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 206 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 207 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 208 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 209 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 210 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 211 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 212 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E
Page 213 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 214 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 215 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 216 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 217 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 218 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 219 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 220 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 221 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 222 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 223 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 224 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 225 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 226 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 227 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 228 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E Page 229 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Justification of the extended calibration> If dipoles are verified in return loss (<-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration for below 3GHz, and <-8dB, within 20% of prior calibration for 5GHz to 6GHz), and in impedance (within 5 ohm of prior calibration), the annual calibration is not necessary and the calibration interval can be extended. <Head 750MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -29.875 - 52.798 - Feb. 13, 2025 -27.437 8.16 49.256 3.542 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data Page 230 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Head 835MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -46.216 - 51.571 - Feb. 13, 2025 -46.314 0.212 48.792 2.779 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data Page 231 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Head 1800MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -25.579 - 44.876 - Feb. 13, 2025 -25.140 1.716 48.510 3.634 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data Page 232 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Head 1900MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -27.206 - 46.948 - Feb. 13, 2025 -28.057 3.128 45.249 1.699 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data Page 233 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Head 2450MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -25.738 - 55.969 - Feb. 13, 2025 -26.659 3.578 54.323 1.646 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data Page 234 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Head 2600MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -23.352 - 55.439 - Feb. 13, 2025 -23.058 1.259 57.024 1.585 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data Page 235 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Head 5200MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -9.494 - 26.574 - Feb. 13, 2025 -10.328 8.784 25.063 1.511 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-8dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data Page 236 of 236 Report No.: N26070210202E <Head 5800MHz> Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) Date of Measurement -15.039 - 40.791 - Feb. 13, 2025 -16.048 6.709 41.217 0.426 Feb. 10, 2026 The return loss is <-8dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. Dipole Verification Data _____________________________________ END_______________________________________
Shenzhen Saiwei Communication Technology Co., LTD Saiwei-Sai to far, Wei to eternity! Antenna Test Report Customer name: Yan Ke Xin Project name: A26-4G Report time: 20260713 Room 401, Building 211, Tair…
Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.
17169 NE 37th Pl, Bellevue, WA 98008 · Bellevue, 98008 · United States
| # | Rule Parts | Frequency Range | Power Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15C | 2.40 GHz - 2.48 GHz | 1.15 mW |
| 2 | 15C | 2.41 GHz - 2.46 GHz | 22.44 mW |