KOBET11TPMTMP System

Lear Corporation 21557 Telegraph Road Southfield, MI 48033-4248 USA Phone (248) 447-1500 Certification for Lear Corporation TPM Wheel Electronic FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE END USER'S MANUAL The following information must be included in the end product user’s manual to ensure continued FCC and Industry Canada regulatory compliance. The ID numbers must be included in the manual if the device label is not readily accessible to the end user. The compliance paragraphs below must be included in the user's manual. The following user's manual statements are provided by Lear Corporation to Fisker Automotive Inc. electronically after certification. FCC ID: KOBHT11TPM IC: 3521A-HT11TPM Model #: 52933-0W100 This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules and with Industry Canada license-exempt RSS standard(s). Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Le présent appareil est conforme aux CNR d'Industrie Canada applicables aux appareils radio exempts de licence. L'exploitation est autorisée aux deux conditions suivantes : (1) l'appareil ne doit pas produire de brouillage, et (2) l'utilisateur de l'appareil doit accepter tout brouillage radioélectrique subi, même si le brouillage est susceptible d'en compromettre le fonctionnement. Note: Changes or modifications not expressively approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user's authority to operate the equipment.

Re: Certification for Lear Transmitter Model/PN(s): C131124501000 FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM POWER OF ATTORNEY A letter granting Valdis V. Liepa the Power of Attorney is on file and can be provided when so requested. February 1, 2011 Re: Certification for Lear Transmitter Model/PN(s): C131124501000 FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM STATEMENT OF MODIFICATIONS There were no modifications made to the DUT by this test laboratory. (Also see Section 3.1 of the attached Test Report). _____________________ Valdis V. Liepa Research Scientist Re: Certification for Lear Transmitter Model/PN(s): C131124501000 FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM GENERAL PRODUCT INFORMATION The device, for which certification is pursued, has been designed by: Lear Corporation 21557 Telegraph Rd Southfield, MI 48033 Contact: Jason Summerford [email protected] Tel: 248.447.1357 Fax: 248.447.1689 It will be manufactured by: Lear Automotive Electronics and Electrical Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd Building 5, No. 509, Ren-Qing Road Zhang Jiang Hi-Tech Park, Pu-Dong, Shanghai, China 201201 Contact: Jason Summerford [email protected] Tel: 248.447.1357 Fax: 248.447.1689 Canadian Contact: 11300 Timber Bay Crescent Windsor, ONT, Canada N8R2L2 Contact: Jeffery Lee [email protected] Tel: 248-447-1635 Fax:248-447-1334

February 1, 2011 Certification and Engineering Bureau Industry Canada 3701 Carling Avenue, Bldg. 94 Ottawa, Ontario K2H 8S2 Re: Certification for Lear Transmitter Model/PN(s): C131124501000 FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM Please find enclosed application materials for certification of Lear Transmitter. We tested the device and found it to comply with RSS-GEN/102/210. The product is identified by: IC: 3521A-ET11TPM If there are any questions, suggestions, etc., regarding the application or testing performed, please contact me at the above address or call 734-483-4211, fax 734-647- 2106; e-mail: [email protected]. Sincerely, Valdis V. Liepa Research Scientist February 1, 2011 Federal Communications Commission Equipment Approval Services P.O. Box 358315 Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 Re: Certification for Lear Transmitter Model/PN(s): C131124501000 FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM Please find enclosed application materials for certification of Lear Transmitter. We tested it and found it to comply with FCC Part 15. If there are any questions regarding the application or testing performed, please contact me at the above address or call 734-483-4211, fax 734-647-2106, or e-mail [email protected]. Sincerely, Valdis V. Liepa Research Scientist

Re: Certification for Lear Transmitter FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY Pursuant to FCC 47 CRF 0.457(d) and 0.459 and IC RSP-100, Section 10, Lear requests that a part of the subject application be held confidential. Lear has spent substantial effort in developing this product and it is one of the first of its kind in industry. Having the subject information easily available to "competition" would negate the advantage they have achieved by developing this product. Not protecting the details of the design will result in financial hardship. Type of Confidentiality Requested Exhibit Short Term Permanent (1) ID Label & Location Short Term Permanent (3) External Photos Short Term Permanent 1 (4) Block Diagram Short Term Permanent (5) Schematics Short Term Permanent (7) Test Setup Photos Short Term Permanent (8) User’s Manual Short Term Permanent 2 (9) Internal Photos Short Term Permanent (10) Parts List & Placement Short Term Permanent (11) RF Exposure Short Term Permanent (12) Description of Operation 1. Block Diagram includes internal oscillator frequency information that the manufacturer considers to be proprietary. 2. DUT is FULLY potted using a non-removable epoxy based material. Removal of potting material causes irreparable damage to internal circuitry. Photograph exhibits outline the half-clam-shell device before and after potting. Permanent Confidentiality: Lear requests the exhibits listed above as permanently confidential be permanently withheld from public review. Short-Term Confidentiality (FCC Only): Lear requests the exhibits selected above as short term confidential be withheld from public view for a period of 45 days from the date of the Grant of Equipment Authorization and prior to marketing. If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact me at the above address or call 734-483-4211, fax 734-647-2106 or e-mail [email protected]. Sincerely, Valdis V. Liepa, Research Scientist University of Michigan

FCC Home | Search | Updates | E-Filing | Initiatives | For Consumers | Find People Joseph Brunett <[email protected]> Response to Inquiry to FCC (Tracking Number 280186) oetech@fccsun27w .fcc.gov <oetech@fccsun27w .fcc.gov>Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:48 PM To: [email protected] Office of Engineering and Technology Inquiry: --- Reply from Customer on 11/08/2008 --- I have just been informed by my TCB that their PBA request for the same devices does not match with this response. They are asking that, per Inquiry 751504, I provide a detailed explanation of how the devices are potted, what the potting material is, how its removal destroys the pcb, and leave me with the impression that a PBA may be needed for every application. Please note that the chemical makeup of the potting material may in itself need to remain confidential as it is proprietary in this industry (not may materials can handle 30g's). Please correspond with the reviewer of KDB Inquiry 751504, relay that internal photographs provided without potting are not obtained by "removing" the potting material, but are "pre-potted" photos, and provide both inquiries with a single, consistent, request for more information if needed. Please indicate if additional PBA requests will be required for every like application. I apologize if the tone of this response seems harsh, I do not mean it to be. However, every delay caused by inconsistent responses requires that I call my clients, outline the problem, request additional information, and request their patience. The current climate in the auto industry makes the final request more challenging as of late. ;) JDB Response: You should not need a PBA request for every filing since you may reference this KDB in each subsequent filing for similar device. Do not reply to this message. Please select the Reply to an Inquiry Response link from the OET Inquiry System to add any additional information pertaining to this inquiry. 10/21/2010Gmail - Response to Inquiry to FCC (Tr... https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik...1/1

February 1, 2011 American Telecommunications Certification Body, Inc. 6731 Whittier Avenue Suite C110 McLean, VA 22101 RE: Certification Application FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM Model/PN(s): C131124501000 Please find enclosed application materials for certification of Lear Transmitter Note: 1) Portions of this submittal are filed Confidential. 2) A list of the modifications made is provided in Attestations. If there are any questions regarding the application or testing performed, please contact me at the above address or call 734-483-4211, fax 734-647-2106, or e-mail [email protected]. Sincerely, Valdis V. Liepa Research Scientist

University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15, IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-600 Page 1 of 12 The University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory 3228 EECS Building Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122 Tel: (734) 764-0500 Fax: (734) 647-2106 Measured Radio Frequency Emissions From Lear Corporation Transmitter FCC ID: KOBET11TPM IC: 3521A-ET11TPM Test Report No. 417124-600 February 1, 2011 Copyright © 2011 For: Lear Corporation 21557 Telegraph Rd Southfield, MI 48033 Contact: Jason Summerford [email protected] Phone: 248.447.1357 Fax: 248.447.1689 Testing supervised by: Measurements made by: Valdis V. Liepa Report Approved by:__________________________ Valdis V. Liepa Test report written by: Joseph D. Brunett Research Scientist Summary Tests for compliance with FCC Regulations, CFR 47, Part 15 and with Industry Canada RSS-210/Gen, were performed on a Lear, FCC ID: KOBET11TPM, IC: 3521A-ET11TPM. This device under test (DUT) is subject to the rules and regulations as a Transmitter. In testing completed on January 26, 2011, the DUT tested met the allowed specifications for radiated emissions by 11.7 dB. Conducted emissions are not subject to regulation as the DUT is powered by a 3 VDC battery. University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15, IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-600 Page 2 of 12 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Equipment Used ............................................................................................................................... 3 3. Device Under Test ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Description & Block Diagram .............................................................................................. 4 3.2 Variants & Samples .............................................................................................................. 4 3.3 Modes of Operation .............................................................................................................. 4 3.4 Exemptions ........................................................................................................................... 4 3.5 EMC Relevant Modifications ............................................................................................... 4 4. Emissions Limits .............................................................................................................................. 5 4.1 Radiated Emissions Limits .................................................................................................... 5 5. Measurement Procedures ................................................................................................................. 6 5.1 Semi-Anechoic Chamber Radiated Emissions ...................................................................... 6 5.2 Outdoor Radiated Emissions ................................................................................................. 6 5.3 Radiated Field Computations ................................................................................................ 6 5.4 Indoor Power Line Conducted Emissions ............................................................................. 6 5.5 Supply Voltage Variation ...................................................................................................... 7 6. Test Results ...................................................................................................................................... 7 6.1 Radiated Emissions ............................................................................................................... 7 6.1.1 Correction for Pulse Operation ......................................................................................... 7 6.1.2 Emission Spectrum ........................................................................................................... 7 6.1.3 Emission Bandwidth ......................................................................................................... 7 6.1.4 Supply Voltage and Supply Voltage Variation ................................................................. 7 6.2 Conducted Emissions ............................................................................................................ 7 University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory FCC Part 15, IC RSS-210/Gen - Test Report No. 417124-600 Page 3 of 12 1. Introduction This Lear Transmitter was tested for compliance with FCC Regulations, Part 15, adopted under Docket 87-389, April 18, 1989 as subsequently amended, and with Industry Canada RSS-210/Gen, Issue 7, June 2007. Tests were performed at the University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory Willow Run Test Range following the procedures described in ANSI C63.4-2003 "Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz". The Site description and attenuation characteristics of the Open Site facility are on file with FCC Laboratory, Columbia, Maryland (FCC Reg. No: 91050) and with Industry Canada, Ottawa, ON (File Ref. No: IC 2057A-1). 2. Equipment Used The test equipment commonly used in our facility is listed in Table 2.1. Except where indicated as a pre- test, monitoring, or support device; all equipment listed below is a part of the University of Michigan Radiation Laboratory (UMRL) quality system. This quality system has been established to ensure all equipment has a clearly identifiable classification, calibration expiry date, and that all calibrations are traceable to national standards. Table 2.1 Test Equipment. Test Instrument Used Manufacturer/Model Q Number Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-26GHz) Hewlett-Packard 8593E, SN: 3412A01131 HP8593E1 Spectrum Analyzer (9kHz-6.5GHz) Hewlett-Packard 8595E, SN: 3543A01546 JDB859…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.