PZK-02040TSecure Sight digital color video monitor

Curtis-Straus TCB (part of Bureau Veritas Consumer Product Services) Littleton Distribution Center One Distribution Center Circle, Suite #1 Littleton, MA 01460 - USA Tel: 978.486.8880 Fax: 978.486.8828 www.BureauVeritas.com/EE Supersede Request Cover Letter Dec 5, 2010 To: Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046-1609 FCC ID: PZK-02040T The test report in the filing has been superseded with an updated version due to the following: It was realized that the test lab used insufficient RBW during output power testing. The RBW used was less than the 20dB BW of the device. Therefore the measurement has been repeated with correct settings. The grant has also been updated to reflect the corrected power reading. We sincerely apologize for this overlook during our review. YUNUS FAZILOGLU Yunus Faziloglu TCB Manager Curtis-Straus TCB (part of Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services) Littleton Distribution Center One Distribution Center Circle, Suite #1 Littleton, MA 01460 – USA 1-978-486 8880 [email protected] [email protected]

Page 1 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Page 2 Page 3 Page 4

(Fig. 1) FCC ID: PZK-02040T FCC LABEL LOCATION The label will be permanently affixed at a conspicuous location on the device. FCC ID

Page 1 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9

Report No.: SA991022E06 Report Format Version 3.0.1 1 RF EXPOSURE REPORT REPORT NO.: SA991022E06 MODEL NO.: 02040 FCC ID: PZK-02040T ACCORDING: FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure IEEE C95.1 APPLICANT: Summer Infant Inc. ADDRESS: 1275 Park East Drive Woonsocket, RI. 02895. United States ISSUED BY: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Hsin Chu Laboratory LAB ADDRESS: No. 81-1, Lu Liao Keng, 9th Ling,Wu Lung Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan Report No.: SA991022E06 Report Format Version 3.0.1 2 RF Exposure Measurement 1. Introduction In this document, we try to prove the safety of radiation harmfulness to the human body for our product. The limit for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) specified in FCC 1.1310 is followed. The Gain of the antenna used in this product is measured in a Fully Anechoic Chamber (FAC) calibrated for antenna measurement in our lab, and also the maximum total power input to the antenna is measured. Through the Friis transmission formula and the maximum gain of the antenna, we can calculate the distance, away from the product, where the limit of MPE is reached. Although the Friis transmission formula is a far field assumption, the calculated result of that is an over-prediction for near field power density. We will take that as the worst case to specify the safety range. 2. RF Exposure Limit According to FCC 1.1310: The criteria listed in the following table shall be used to evaluate the environmental impact of human exposure to radio-frequency (RF) radiation as specified in 1.1307(b) LIMITS FOR MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (V/m) Magnetic Field Strength (A/m) Power Density (mW/cm 2 ) Average Time (minutes) (A)Limits For Occupational / Control Exposures 300-1500 ... ... F/300 6 1500-100,000 ... ... 5 6 (B)Limits For General Population / Uncontrolled Exposure 300-1500 ... ... F/1500 30 1500-100,000 ... ... 1.0 30 F = Frequency in MHz Report No.: SA991022E06 Report Format Version 3.0.1 3 3. Friis Formula Friis transmission formula : Pd = (Pout*G) / (4*pi*r 2 ) where Pd = power density in mW/cm 2 Pout = output power to antenna in mW G = gain of antenna in linear scale Pi = 3.1416 R = distance between observation point and center of the radiator in cm Pd is the limit of MPE, 1 mW/cm 2 . If we know the maximum Gain of the antenna and the total power input to the antenna, through the calculation, we will know the MPE value at distance 20cm. Ref. : David K. Cheng, Field and Wave Electromagnetics, Second Edition, Page 640, Eq. (11-133). 4. EUT Operating condition The software provided by Manufacturer enabled the EUT to transmit and receive data at lowest, middle and highest channel individually. 5. Classification The antenna of this product, under normal use condition, is at least 20cm away from the body of the user. So, this device is classified as Mobile Device Report No.: SA991022E06 Report Format Version 3.0.1 4 6. TEST RESULTS 6.1 Antenna Gain There is one antenna provided to this EUT, please refer to the following table: Antenna Type Antenna Gain (dBi) Connector Frequency range (MHz) Dipole 1 NA 2408.625 to 2470.5 6.2 Output Power Into Antenna & RF Exposure value at distance 20cm: Channel Channel Frequency (MHz) Output Power to Antenna (mW) Power Density (mW/cm 2 ) Limit of Power Density (mW/cm 2 ) 0 2408.625 112.2 0.028 1.0 28 2436.75 109.6 0.027 1.0 60 2469.375 95.5 0.024 1.0 --- END ---

Report No.: RF991022E06 1 Report Format Version 3.0.1 FCC TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: RF991022E06 MODEL NO.: 02040 FCC ID: PZK-02040T RECEIVED: Oct. 22, 2010 TESTED: Oct. 29 to Nov. 05, 2010 and Nov. 29, 2010 ISSUED: Nov. 29, 2010 APPLICANT: Summer Infant Inc. ADDRESS: 1275 Park East Drive Woonsocket, RI. 02895. United States ISSUED BY: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Hsin Chu Laboratory LAB ADDRESS: No. 81-1, Lu Liao Keng, 9th Ling,Wu Lung Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan TEST LOCATION (1): No. 81-1, Lu Liao Keng, 9th Ling,Wu Lung Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan TEST LOCATION (2): No. 49, Ln. 206, Wende Rd., Shangshan Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan This test report consists of 51 pages in total. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Report No.: RF991022E06 2 Report Format Version 3.0.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CERTIFICATION..................................................................................................4 2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS...........................................................................5 2.1 ME ASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY.......................................................................6 3 GENERAL INFORMATION...................................................................................7 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT......................................................................7 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES........................................................................8 3.3 TEST MODE APPLICABLITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL:..........................9 3.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS.......................................11 3.5 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS................................................................12 3.6 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST..................................................13 4 TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS................................................................14 4.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT.......................................................14 4.1.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT.....................................14 4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................14 4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................15 4.1.4 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................15 4.1.5 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS........................................................................16 3.0.1 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................17 3.1 NUMBER OF HOPPING FREQUENCY USED....................................................19 3.1.1 LIMIT OF HOPPING FREQUENCY USED..........................................................19 3.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................19 3.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................19 3.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................19 3.1.5 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................20 3.1.6 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................20 3.2 DWELL TIME ON EACH CHANNEL...................................................................22 3.2.1 LIMIT OF DWELL TIME USED...........................................................................22 3.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................22 3.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................22 3.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................23 3.2.5 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................23 3.2.6 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................23 3.3 CHANNEL BANDWIDTH....................................................................................25 3.3.1 LIMITS OF CHANNEL BANDWIDTH..................................................................25 3.3.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................25 3.3.3 TEST PROCEDURE..........................................................................................25 3.3.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................25 3.3.5 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................26 3.3.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITION..........................................................................26 3.3.7 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................27 Report No.: RF991022E06 3 Report Format Version 3.0.1 3.4 HOPPING CHANNEL SEPARATION..................................................................29 3.4.1 LIMIT OF HOPPING CHANNEL SEPARATION...................................................29 3.4.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................29 3.4.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................29 3.4.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................30 3.4…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

1 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 2 RADIATED EMISSION TEST