PZK-28030RBest View digital color video monitor

Page 1 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Page 2 Page 3

(Fig. 1) FCC ID: PZK-28030R FCC LABEL LOCATION The label will be permanently affixed at a conspicuous location on the device. FCC ID

Page 1 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9

Report No.: SA991022E12 Report Format Version 3.0.1 1 RF EXPOSURE REPORT REPORT NO.: SA991022E12 MODEL NO.: 28030 FCC ID: PZK-28030R ACCORDING: FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure IEEE C95.1 APPLICANT: Summer Infant Inc. ADDRESS: 1275 Park East Drive Woonsocket, RI. 02895. United States ISSUED BY: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Hsin Chu Laboratory LAB ADDRESS: No. 81-1, Lu Liao Keng, 9th Ling,Wu Lung Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan Report No.: SA991022E12 Report Format Version 3.0.1 2 No SAR justification for FCC ID : PZK-28030R Maximum number of times The portable monitor connects to surveillance camera with a fixed Transmitting / Receiving duty cycle of 0.44ms: 4.16ms (9.6%) as calculated below. This ratio is fixed programmed in the firmware and is not user changeable. Actual Tx-on time for transmitting Duty factor Complete cycle time: 0.44msec + 4.16msec = 4.6msec Worst case duty cycle=0.44msec / 4.6msec =0.096*100% = 9.6% Report No.: SA991022E12 Report Format Version 3.0.1 3 Source-base time average conducted power table Channel Frequency (MHz) Conducted power (dBm) Conducted power (mW) Source-based time-averaged conducted output power (mW) Source- based time-averaged eirp power (mW) SAR threshold (mW) 0 2408.625 20.9 123.0 11.81 11.81 24 28 2436.75 20.4 109.6 10.52 10.52 24 60 2469.375 19.9 97.7 9.38 9.38 24 There is one antenna provided to this EUT, please refer to the following table: Antenna Type Antenna Gain (dBi) Connector Frequency range (MHz) monopole 0 NA 2408.625 to 2470.5 Conclusion Since Source-base time average power is below SAR exempt power level, the SAR evaluation is not required. Signal plot ON Time: Figure 1 Report No.: SA991022E12 Report Format Version 3.0.1 4 ON+OFF Time: --- END --- Figure 2 Figure 3

Report No.: RF991022E12 1 Report Format Version 3.0.1 FCC TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: RF991022E12 MODEL NO.: 28030 FCC ID: PZK-28030R RECEIVED: Oct. 22, 2010 TESTED: Nov. 01 to 05, 2010 and Nov. 29, 2010 ISSUED: Nov. 29, 2010 APPLICANT: Summer Infant Inc. ADDRESS: 1275 Park East Drive Woonsocket, RI. 02895. United States ISSUED BY: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch Hsin Chu Laboratory LAB ADDRESS: No. 81-1, Lu Liao Keng, 9th Ling,Wu Lung Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan TEST LOCATION (1): No. 81-1, Lu Liao Keng, 9th Ling,Wu Lung Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan TEST LOCATION (2): No. 49, Ln. 206, Wende Rd., Shangshan Tsuen, Chiung Lin Hsiang, Hsin Chu Hsien 307, Taiwan This test report consists of 52 pages in total. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by TAF or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Report No.: RF991022E12 2 Report Format Version 3.0.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CERTIFICATION..................................................................................................4 2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS...........................................................................5 2.1 ME ASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY.......................................................................6 3 GENERAL INFORMATION...................................................................................7 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT......................................................................7 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES........................................................................9 3.3 TEST MODE APPLICABLITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL:........................10 3.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS.......................................12 3.5 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS................................................................13 3.6 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST..................................................14 4 TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS................................................................15 4.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT.......................................................15 4.1.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT.....................................15 4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................15 4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................16 4.1.4 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................16 4.1.5 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS........................................................................17 3.0.1 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................18 3.1 NUMBER OF HOPPING FREQUENCY USED....................................................20 3.1.1 LIMIT OF HOPPING FREQUENCY USED..........................................................20 3.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................20 3.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................20 3.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................20 3.1.5 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................21 3.1.6 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................21 3.2 DWELL TIME ON EACH CHANNEL...................................................................23 3.2.1 LIMIT OF DWELL TIME USED...........................................................................23 3.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................23 3.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................23 3.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................24 3.2.5 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................24 3.2.6 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................24 3.3 CHANNEL BANDWIDTH....................................................................................26 3.3.1 LIMITS OF CHANNEL BANDWIDTH..................................................................26 3.3.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................26 3.3.3 TEST PROCEDURE..........................................................................................26 3.3.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................26 3.3.5 TEST SETUP....................................................................................................27 3.3.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITION..........................................................................27 3.3.7 TEST RESULTS................................................................................................28 Report No.: RF991022E12 3 Report Format Version 3.0.1 3.4 HOPPING CHANNEL SEPARATION..................................................................30 3.4.1 LIMIT OF HOPPING CHANNEL SEPARATION...................................................30 3.4.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS.......................................................................................30 3.4.3 TEST PROCEDURES........................................................................................30 3.4.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD...............................................................31 3.4.5 TES…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

1 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST 2 RADIATED EMISSION TEST