T3X-BLG2BBlue Line Gen 2 Combinded PIR/Microwave Detector

Radionix, LLC. Intrusion and Access 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, NY 14450 www.radionix.com March 12, 2026 To: Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Attestation Section 2.911(d)(5)(i) and Section 2.911(d)(5)(ii) (KDB 986446 D01 Covered Equipment) Section 2.911(d)(5)(i) Radionix LLC, the applicant for Grantee Code T3X, certifies that the equipment for which authorization is sought is not “covered” equipment prohibited from receiving an equipment authorization pursuant to section 2.903 of the FCC rules. Section 2.911(d)(5)(ii) Radionix LLC (“the applicant”) certifies that, as of the date of the filing of the application, the applicant is not identified on the Covered List (as a specifically named entity or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) as an entity producing “covered” equipment. Type of Equipment subject to FCC Certification: Field Disturbance Sensor FCC ID: T3X-BLG2B If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Contact Person: Peter J. Namisnak Position in the Company: Sr. Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Date of Signature: March 12, 2026 ___________________________ Signatory (signature of the applicant)

ww Radionix. Mission control, for your security. Radionix and the logotype are registered trademarks of Radionix, LLC To: Federal Communications Commission 09-April 2026 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Attestation Certification designating a U.S. Agent for Service of Process Section 2.911(d)(7) (KDB 986446 D01 Covered Equipment) We, Radionix LLC, as required by section 2.911(d)(7), designate ourselves for purposes of acting as U.S agent for service of process. We also accept to maintain an agent for no less than one year after we have terminated all marketing and importation or the conclusion of any Commission-related proceeding involving the equipment. Type of Equipment subject to FCC Certification: Blue Line Gen 2 Combined PIR/Microwave Detector FCC ID: T3X-BLG2B Sincerely yours, Applicant/Grantee/US Agent FRN: 0006167399 _________________ (Signature) Peter J. Namisnak, Sr. Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Radionix LLC 130 Perinton Parkway, Fairport, NY 14450 [email protected] +1(585)678-3462

To: Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Attestation FCC Justification Statement about Antenna Gain Information This device complies with the FCC limits for fundamental and spurious emissions solely by radiated measurements as documented in the test report. Therefore, neither antenna manufacturers data sheets, antenna reference design specification nor Antenna Under Test (AUT) reports as required for the FCC certification under CFR 47 Part 15. FCC ID: T3X-BLG2B FCC Rule Part Section: 15.245 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me Authorized Agent Assistant Test Laboratory RADIO PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH

ww Radionix. Mission control, for your security. Radionix and the logotype are registered trademarks of Radionix, LLC Radionix, LLC. Intrusion and Access 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, NY 14450 www.radionix.com April 9, 2026 PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH Product Certification Department Koenigswinkel 10 32825 Blomberg, Germany Power of Attorney To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that we, Radionix LLC, authorize the following persons from PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH: • Sabrina Berghahn to act on our behalf in all matters relating to application for equipment authorization, including the signing of all documents relating to these matters in the following countries: USA Canada PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH has our permission to use our technical documents for the approvals for the following name device: Product description: Blue Line Gen 2 Combined PIR/Microwave Motion Detector FCC ID: T3X-BLG2B IC: 1249A-BLG2B HVIN: ISC-BDL2-W12G, ISC-BDL2-WP12G PMN: BLG2 FVIN: V3.03 ww Radionix. Mission control, for your security. Radionix and the logotype are registered trademarks of Radionix, LLC Unless future correspondence from Radionix LLC please extend your full cooperation to PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH regarding matters to the above mentioned products to 12 months after the signatory date of this authorization. Contact person Peter Namisnak Position in the company Senior Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Date of signatory 13-March 2026 Peter J. Namisnak Signatory (signature of the applicant)

Long/Short-term Confidentiality Request Federal Communication Commission 445 12 th SW, Washington D.C. USA FCC ID: T3X-BLG2B To Whom it may concerns, Pursuant to sections 0.457(d) and 0.459 of CFR 47 and to avoid premature release of sensitive information prior to marketing or release of the product to the public, the Grantee hereby requests long-term confidential treatment of information accompanying this application as outlined below: ☒ Schematics ☒ Parts List ☒ Block Diagram ☐ Tune-Up Info ☒ Operational Description In addition, the Grantee requests the following exhibits contained in this application to be temporarily (short-term confidentiality) withheld from the public disclosure ☒ for an initial period of 45 days ☐ until: ☐ not applicable ☒ External Photos ☒ Test Setup Photos ☒ Internal Photos ☒ Users Manual The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Grantee understands that pursuant to rule 0.457(d), disclosure of this application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the GRANT for this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours sincerely Authorized Agent

To: Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Product Equality Declaration FCC ID: T3X-BLG2B Product description: Blue Line Gen 2 Combined PIR/Microwave Motion Detector The applicant & Grantee Radionix, LLC (GC Code T3X) hereby declares, that the tested and certified EUT (ISC-BDL2-WP12G) is electrically identical to the not tested variant (ISC-BDL2- W12G). The only difference between these two devices is the “Pet Friendly Adjustment” that is implemented in the EUT and activated by closing an electrical contact. The entire electronic (PCB, 10.5 GHz FDS, etc.) is identical, but there is only a difference in the population of two SMD resistors: ISC-BDL2-WP12G – with Pet Friendly Adjustment: R100 is not populated, R101 is populated. ISC-BDL2-W12G – without Pet Friendly Adjustment: R100 is populated, R101 is not populated. Compared to the EUT there is a minor firmware version update to V3.03 that improves the signal processing for the alarm. Neither this minor hardware nor firmware difference has an impact on the fully tested 10.5 GHz Field Disturbance Sensor. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours sincerely, Authorized Agent

Königswinkel 10 32825 Blomberg, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 52 35 / 95 00-0 Fax:+49 (0) 52 35 / 95 00-10 [email protected] www.phoenix-testlab.de FCC RF Exposure Evaluation Report Number: F251065E4 Equipment under Test (EUT): ISC-BDL2-WP12G Applicant: Radionix LLC Manufacturer: Keenfinity S.A. Examiner:Sebastian KREHSReport Number: F251065E5 Date of Issue: 16.04.2026Order Number: 25-111065Page 2 of 11 References [1] CFR 47 Rule part 1Practice and Procedure [2] CFR 47 Rule part 2Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations [3] KDB 447498 D04Interim General RF Exposure Guidance v01 This evaluation report is only valid in its original form. Any reproduction of its contents in extracts without written permission of the accredited test laboratory PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH is prohibited. The evaluation results herein refer only to the tested sample. PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH is not responsible for any generalisations or conclusions drawn from these evaluation results concerning further samples. Any modification of the evaluated samples is prohibited and leads to the invalidity of this evaluation report. Each page necessarily contains the PHOENIX TESTLAB Logo and the EVALUATION REPORT NUMBER. Assessed and written by: Signature Reviewed and approved by: Signature Examiner:Sebastian KREHSReport Number: F251065E5 Date of Issue: 16.04.2026Order Number: 25-111065Page 3 of 11 Contents:Page Identification ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1Applicant ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2Manufacturer ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3Test Laboratory ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4EUT (Equipment Under Test) ................................................................................................................... 5 1.5Technical data of equipment .................................................................................................................... 5 Evaluation Methods ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1RF exposure test exemptions for single sources ..................................................................................... 6 2.1.1General exemption CFR 47 §1.1307(b)(3)(i)(A) .............................................................................. 6 2.1.2SAR based exemption CFR 47 §1.1307(b)(3)(i)(B) ........................................................................ 6 2.1.3MPE based exemption CFR 47 §1.1307(b)(3)(i)(C) ........................................................................ 6 2.1.4Stand alone MPE evaluation limits .................................................................................................. 7 2.2RF exposure test exemptions for simultaneous transmission sources .................................................... 8 2.2.11 mW test exemption for simultaneous transmission sources ........................................................ 8 2.2.2Simultaneous transmission SAR based and MPE based test exemptions ..................................... 8 2.2.3Test exemption based on the SAR to Peak Location Separation Ratio .......................................... 9 Results of evaluation ................................................................................................................... 10 3.1Used evaluation methods ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.2General exemption ................................................................................................................................. 11 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 11 Report History ............................................................................................................................. 11 Examiner:Sebastian KREHSReport Number: F251065E5 Date of Issue: 16.04.2026Order Number: 25-111065Page 4 of 11 Identification 1.1 Applicant Name:Radionix LLC Address: 130 Perinton Parkway Fairport, NY 14450 Country:United States of America Name for contact purposes:Mr Peter NAMISNAK Phone:+1 585 678 – 34 62 eMail Address:[email protected] Applicant represented during the test by the following person: --- 1.2 Manufacturer Name:Keenfinity S.A. Address: EN109/IC1, Zona Industrial de Ovar Lugar da Pardala - S. João de Ovar 3880-728 Ovar Country:Portugal Name for contact purposes:Mr. Antonio PEREIRA Phone:+351 256 596 - 110 eMail Address:[email protected] Manufacturer represented during the test by the following person: --- 1.3 Test Laboratory The tests were carried out at:PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH Königswinkel 10 32825 Blomberg Germany accredited byDeutsche Akkreditierungsstelle GmbH (DAkkS) according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2018. The accreditation is only valid for the scope of accreditation listed in the annex of the certificate D-PL-17186-01-00. FCC Test Firm Designation Number DE0004, FCC Test Firm Registration Number 469623, CAB Identifier DE0003 and ISED# 3469A. Examiner:Sebastian KREHSReport Number: F251065E5 Date of Issue: 16.04.2026Order Number: 25-111065Page 5 of 11 1.4 EUT (Equipment Under Test) Test object: *Blue Line Gen 2 Combined PIR/Microwave Motion Detector PMN: *BLG2 HVIN: *ISC-BDL2-WP12G FCC ID: *T3X-BLG2B Serial number: *042163657328100138 PCB identifier: *F01U424565_01 Software version / FVIN: *V3.02 Lowest internal frequency: *8 MHz *:Declared by the applican…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Königswinkel 10 32825 Blomberg, Germany Phone:+49 (0) 52 35 / 95 00-0 Fax:+49 (0) 52 35 / 95 00-10 [email protected] www.phoenix-testlab.de Test Report Report Number: F251065E4 Equipment under Test (EUT): ISC-BDL2-WP12G Applicant: Radionix LLC Manufacturer: Keenfinity S.A. Test engineer: Sebastian KREHSReport Number:F251065E4 Date of issue: 16.04.2026Order Number:25-111065page 2 of 35 References [1] ANSI C63.10 – 2020 + Cor. 1 – 2023 + C63.10a-2024 + Errata to C63.10a-2024 American National Standard for Compliance Testing of Transmitters Used in Licensed Radio Services (The errata is not in accreditation scope of the laboratory yet) [2] FCC CFR 47 Part 15, Radio Frequency Devices [3] RSS-210 Issue 11 – June 2024,Licence-Exempt Radio Apparatus: Category I Equipment [4] RSS-Gen Issue 5 – April 2018 + Amendment 1 – March 2019 + Amendment 2 – February 2021,General Requirements for Compliance of Radio Apparatus TEST RESULT The requirements of the tests performed as shown in the overview (clause 4) were fulfilled by the equipment under test. The complete test results are presented in the following. “Passed” indicates that the equipment under test conforms with the relevant limits of the testing standard without taking any measurement uncertainty into account as stated in clause 1.4 of ANSI C63.10 (2020). However, the measurement uncertainty is calculated and shown in this test report. Tested and written by: Signature Reviewed and approved by: Signature This test report is only valid in its original form. Any reproduction of its contents in extracts without written permission of the accredited test laboratory PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH is prohibited. The test results herein refer only to the tested sample. PHOENIX TESTLAB GmbH is not responsible for any generalisations or conclusions drawn from these test results concerning further samples. Any modification of the tested samples is prohibited and leads to the invalidity of this test report. Each page necessarily contains the PHOENIX TESTLAB Logo and the TEST REPORT NUMBER. Test engineer: Sebastian KREHSReport Number:F251065E4 Date of issue: 16.04.2026Order Number:25-111065page 3 of 35 Contents:Page 1Identification ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1Applicant ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2Manufacturer .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3Test laboratory ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.4EUT (Equipment Under Test)........................................................................................................... 5 1.5Technical data of equipment ............................................................................................................ 5 1.6Dates ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2Operational states .................................................................................................................................... 6 3Additional information ............................................................................................................................... 6 4Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 6 5Test results ............................................................................................................................................... 7 5.1Bandwidth ......................................................................................................................................... 7 5.1.1Method of measurement (bandwidth) ....................................................................................... 7 5.1.2Test results (20 dB bandwidth) ................................................................................................. 9 5.1.3Test results (99 % bandwidth) ................................................................................................ 10 5.2Band-edge compliance .................................................................................................................. 11 5.2.1Method of measurement (band-edge compliance) ................................................................. 11 5.2.2Test results (band-edge compliance)...................................................................................... 12 5.3Radiated emissions ........................................................................................................................ 14 5.3.1Method of measurement (radiated emissions) ....................................................................... 14 5.3.2Test results (radiated emissions) ............................................................................................ 23 5.3.2.1Preliminary radiated emission measurement (1 MHz to 60 GHz) ................................... 23 5.3.2.2Final radiated emission measurement (1 MHz to 30 MHz) ............................................. 26 5.3.2.3Final radiated emission measurement (30 MHz to 1 GHz) ............................................. 26 5.3.2.4Final radiated emission measurement (1 GHz to 60 GHz) .............................................. 28 5.4Conducted emissions on power supply lines (150 kHz to 30 MHz) ............................................... 30 5.4.1Method of measurement ......................................................................................................... 30 5.4.2Test results (conducted emissions on power supply lines) ....................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.