YSD-5840-SL-3000MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar

 
  Weather Station Power Supply Enclosure Human Machine Interface (HMI) Control Panel Toolbox Radar Antenna Emergency Stop
 
  Radar Transceiver Communications Module Electronics Enclosure Antenna Pointing Unit (APU) Extendable Leg Generator Cage
     Fuel Tank Strobe Light

SERIAL No.: MOD REC 123456 MOVEMENT & SURVEYING RADAR MSR 300 APPROVEDREVCHECKEDDRAWN FINISHING PROCESS: SEE NOTES TREATMENT: SEE NOTES SURFACE TEXTURE: MATERIAL: DATEECP No. SHT 1 OF 1 REF HOLE SIZE NO OFF POS. TOL. Reutech Radar Systems (Pty) Ltd TITLE P.O. BOX 686 STELLENBOSCH SOUTH AFRICA 7599 UNCLASSIFIED THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION N/A DRAWN TO BS 308 UOS DIMENSIONS IN mm UOS DO NOT SCALE ORIGINAL SCALE 1:1 ORIGINAL SIZE A4 TOOL AND GAUGES N/A N/A ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTSNEXT ASSEMBLYUSED ON N/A UNQUOTED TOLERANCES DIMENSIONSANGLES ±0,5mm ±0,5º Reutech Radar Systems. The copyright of this document and the information contained therein is property of Reutech Radar Systems. The document is issued for the sole purpose for which it is supplied, on the express terms that it may not be copied in whole or part, used by or disclosed to others except as authorised in writing by Reutech Radar Systems C A B C D 1 23 4 CHANGES AT REV NOTES: RESISTANT INK OR PAINT. 3) TEXT AND GRAPHICS COLOUR BLACK. 4) BACKGROUND COLOUR NATURAL ANODISED. 5) ETCH GRAPHICS ON LAYER “GRAPHICS”. 6) BACKGROUND ON LAYER “OUTLINE”. LABEL, IDENTIFICATION, MOVEMENT & SURVEYING RADAR: MSR 300 (FCC) ALUMINIUM, 1,2mm THICK 130,0 30,0 2010/07/21 1 ML RADAR SYSTEMS M I N I N G This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions; (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. FCC ID: YSD-5840-SL-3000 2) ETCH AND FILL USING AN ULTRA VIOLET 1) USE FILE 5840-SL-2648 V01.00 REV 1.cdr AS ARTWORK 5840-SL-2648V01.00 D Lable Location The FCC Label Location is shown in the picture above. The existing label will be replaced with the label shown in the exploded view in the same position as the existing label.

Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Washington Labs, Limited. Maximum Permissible Exposure Evaluation For the MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar FCC ID: YSD -5840-SL-3000 September 17, 2010 WLL Report: 11603-MPE Prepared for: MALA GEOSCIENCE USA INC. P.O. BOX 80430 CHARLESTON, SC 29416 Prepared by: WASHINGTON LABORATORIES, LTD. 7560 LINDBERGH DRIVE G AITHERSBURG, MARYLAND 20879 Testing Certificate AT-1448 MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device RF Exposure Test Report September, 2010 WLL Report #11603-MPE - ii - © 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. Maximum Permissible Exposure Evaluation For the MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar September 17, 2010 WLL Report # 11603-MPE Prepared by: John P. Repella Q A Manager Reviewed by: Steven D. Koster EMC Operations Manager MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device RF Exposure Test Report September, 2010 WLL Report #11603-MPE - iii - © 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. Abstract This report has been prepared on behalf of MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device to document the findings of the maximum permissible exposure evaluation on the MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device. The purpose of this evaluation is to establish a minimum safe distance as per the RF exposure requirements as defined in FCC §1.1307 & §1.1310. This report documents the results of testing to the requirements of: • CFR Title 47 Volume 1 Practice and Procedure; (1.1307) Environmental Assessments The Evaluation was performed by Washington Laboratories, Ltd, 7560 Lindbergh Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879. Washington Laboratories, Ltd. has been accepted as an EMC Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) under the United States/European Union Memorandum of Agreement. At the time of the initial issuance of this report, Washington Laboratories, Ltd. was accepted by the FCC and approved by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) under Certificate 2675.01 as an independent FCC test laboratory. As of April 1, 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. is accepted by the FCC and approved by Assured Calibration and Laboratory Accreditation Select Services (ACLASS) under testing certificate AT-1448. Revision History Reason Date Rev 0 Initial Release September 17, 2010 MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device RF Exposure Test Report September, 2010 WLL Report #11603-MPE - iv - © 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Requirements .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Transmitter Categories ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Exposure Categories ................................................................................................................................ 1 3 Device Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure Evaluation ..................................................................................3 MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device RF Exposure Test Report September, 2010 WLL Report #11603-MPE - v - © 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. List of Tables Table 1: MPE Limits ..................................................................................................................................................2 Table 2: Device Summary of the Mine Slope Radar Device......................................................................................3 Table 3: Transmitter MPE Calculation Summary ......................................................................................................4 MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device RF Exposure Test Report September, 2010 WLL Report #11603-MPE - Page 1 of 4 - © 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. 1 Introduction This report has been prepared on behalf of MALA GeoScience USA INC. Mine Slope Radar Device. Transmitter to show compliance with the RF exposure requirements as defined in FCC §1.1307. Testing supporting this evaluation was performed at Washington Laboratories, Ltd, 7560 Lindbergh Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879. Washington Laboratories, Ltd. has been accepted as an EMC Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) under the United States/European Union Memorandum of Agreement. Washington Laboratories, Ltd. is accredited with ACLASS under Testing Certificate AT-1448. 2 Requirements Three different categories of transmitters are defined by the FCC in OET Bulletin 65. These categories are fixed installation, mobile, and portable. Additionally, the FCC categorizes the use of the devices based on the user’s awareness and the ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. The two categories are defined as Occupational/Controlled Exposure and General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure. 2.1 Transmitter Categories 2.1.1 Fixed Installations A fixed location means that the device, including its antenna, is physically secured at a permanent location and is not able to be easily moved to another location. Additionally, distance to humans from the antenna is maintained to at least 2 meters. 2.1.2 Mobile Devices A mobile device is defined as a transmitting device designed to be used in other than fixed locations and to be generally used in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters is normally maintained between the transmitter's radiati…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Page | 1 Test Report For The MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar 06 July 2010 Prepared by: Kgabo Frans Mathapo RF Design Engineer Page | 2 1. Introduction Test Scope Tests for the RF output power (at TRX output) were performed. Test Dates Testing was performed on the following date(s): 06/07/2010 Test and Support Personnel SunSpace and Information Systems (PTY) LTD Kgabo F. Mathapo Client Representative (Reutech Radar Systems) Anton Joubert Abbreviations CW Continuous Wave EUT Equipment Under Test MSR Movement and Surveying Radar RF Radio Frequency TRX Transceiver TX Transmit Page | 3 2. Test Configuration The MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar was configured as a self contained trailer mounted unit. Under normal operation, the EUT sweeps a CW signal from 9.775GHz to 10.0GHz. The spectrum of the output signal of the MSR 300 under normal operation is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Normal Operation Output Signal Spectrum Page | 4 Test Algorithm The MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar was operated by selecting the operating mode, CW or sweep, by depressing the PB0 button on the control board. Each press of PB0 cycled the EUT mode from normal Sweep to CW-Start of Sweep Frequency to CW- 9.8GHz to CW- 9.9GHz to CW- 10GHz. The RF Power measurements were taken at the TX port of the Transceiver module. Test Equipments Table 1 shows the list of the test equipments used for measurements and their calibration information. Table 1: Calibrated test equipment used No Instrument description Manufacturer and model number of instrument used Serial number Date of next calibration/Ref instrument 1 Spectrum Analyser(26.5GHz) Agilent E4407B MY41440621 22/02/2011 2 Peak Power meter HP 438A 2649U00562 19/02/2011 3 Peak Power Sensor HP 8481A 2702A70905 27/11/2010 3. Test Results RF Output Power: The transmitter’s RF output power was measured using both the Spectrum Analyser and Peak Power meter. The output of the transmitter was connected to the RF Spectrum Analyser using an SMA coaxial cable and measurements were taken. The transmitter output power was measured at the TX port using the peak power meter (without the SMA cable ). After that, the output of the transmitter was connected to the power meter using the same coaxial cable used in the spectrum analyser measurements and measurements were made. The cable loss was determined by connecting the power meter to the output of the transmitter (without the cable) and measuring the output power, and then connecting the cable to the output of the transmitter and measuring with the power meter at the cable end. The cable loss was obtained by subtracting the power meter reading at the end of the cable from the power reading at the Page | 5 transmitter output. The cable loss was found to be: 16.12 – 13.04 = 3.08 dB at 9.775GHz 16.85 – 14.21 = 2.64 dB at 9.9 GHz 17.34 – 14.06 = 3.28 dB (worst case cable loss at 10GHz). The carrier was not modulated. The results are shown in Table 2. Table 2: RF Output Power Frequency Spectrum Analyser: Output power with cable Spectrum Analyser: output power with cable loss added Cable loss Power meter: Peak output power with cable Power meter : peak output power at TRX output Low Frequency 9.775GHz 10.81dBm 13.89dBm 3.08dB 13.04dBm 16.12dBm Centre Frequency 9.9GHz 13.19dBm 15.83dBm 2.64dB 14.21dBm 16.85dBm High Frequency 10GHz 12.72dBm 16.00dBm 3.28dB 14.06dBm 17.34dBm Page | 6 Figure 2: RF Peak power, Low Frequency. Figure 3 : Power Meter Reading for RF Peak Power, Low Frequency (13.04 dBm using cable) Page | 7 Figure 4: Power meter for RF Peak Power, Low Frequency at TX output (16.12 dBm without cable). Page | 8 Figure 5: RF Peak Power, Centre Frequency Figure 6: Power Meter Reading for RF Peak Power, Centre Frequency (14.21 dBm using cable) Page | 9 Figure 7: Power Meter Reading for RF Peak Power at TRX output without cable, Centre Frequency (16.85 dBm) Page | 10 Figure 8: RF Peak Power, High Frequency. Figure 9: Power Meter Reading for RF Peak Power, High frequency (14.06 dBm using cable). Page | 11 Figure 10: Power Meter Reading for RF Peak Power, High Frequency at TX output (17.34 dBm without cable). Page | 12 The DELTA measurements results are shown in Figure 11 to Figure 14. Figure 11: DELTA measurements for the normal operation. Figure 12: DELTA measurements for the low frequency Page | 13 Figure 13: DELTA measurements for the centre frequency Figure 14: DELTA measurements for the high frequency Page | 14 Figure 15: Normal operation measurements(marker 2 reading). Figure 16: Normal operation measurements(marker 1 reading).

Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Washington Laboratories, Limited. FCC Certification Test Report For the MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar FCC ID: YSD-5840-SL-3000 WLL JOB# 11061 September 2, 2009 Re-issued: Under WLL Job# 11603 September 16, 2010 Prepared for: MALA GeoScience USA INC. P.O. Box 80430 Charleston, SC 29416 Prepared By: Washington Laboratories, Ltd. 7560 Lindbergh Drive Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879 Testing Certificate AT-1448 MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar FCC Certification Test Report August 2010 Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Washington Laboratories, Limited. FCC Certification Test Report For the MALA Geoscience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar FCC ID: YSD-5840-SL-3000 September 2, 2009 WLL JOB# 11061 Re-issued September 16, 2010 Under Job# 11603 Prepared by: John P. Repella Q A Manager Reviewed by: Steven D. Koster EMC Operations Manager MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar FCC Certification Test Report August, 2010 WLL Report #11603-01 - ii - © 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. Abstract This report has been prepared on behalf of MALA GeoScience USA INC. to support the attached Application for Equipment Authorization. The test report and application are submitted for a Licensed Transmitter under Part 90 of the FCC Rules and Regulations (10/2008). This Certification Test Report documents the test configuration and test results for a MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar. Testing was performed on an Open Area Test Site (OATS) of Washington Laboratories, Ltd, 7560 Lindbergh Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879. Site description and site attenuation data have been placed on file with the FCC's Sampling and Measurements Branch at the FCC laboratory in Columbia, MD. The Industry Canada OATS numbers are 3035A-1 and 3035A-2 for Washington Laboratories, Ltd. Site 1 and Site 2, respectively. At the time of the initial issuance of this report, Washington Laboratories, Ltd. was accepted by the FCC and approved by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) under Certificate 2675.01 as an independent FCC test laboratory. As of April 1, 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. is accepted by the FCC and approved by Assured Calibration and Laboratory Accreditation Select Services (ACLASS) under testing certificate AT-1448. The Testing completed by Washington Laboratories LTD. for the MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar complies with the limits for a Licensed Transmitter device under FCC Part 90. No compliance statement is made with regard to the testing completed by SunSpace and Information Systems. Revision History Reason Date Rev 0 Initial Release 09/02/2009 Rev 1 Re-released under new Job# 11603. This revision incorporates references to third party test report completed by SunSpace and Information Systems, LTD for power measurements. The power measurements made at WLL were removed from this report. 08/18/2010 MALA GeoScience USA INC. MSR 300 Movement and Surveying Radar FCC Certification Test Report August, 2010 WLL Report #11603-01 - iii - © 2010 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Compliance Statement .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Test Scope ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Contract Information ....................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Test Dates ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.5 Test and Support Personnel ............................................................................................ 1 1.6 Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 2 2 Equipment Under Test ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1 EUT Identification & Description .................................................................................. 3 2.2 Test Configuration .......................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Testing Algorithm ........................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Test Location .................................................................................................................. 6 2.5 Measurements ................................................................................................................. 6 2.6 Measurement Uncertainty ............................................................................................... 6 3 Test Equipment ....................................................................................................................... 8 4 Test Results ............................................................................................................................. 9 4.1 RF Power Output: (FCC Part §2.1046) .......................................................................... 9 4.2 Occupied Bandwidth: (FCC Part §90.210(c)) ................................................................ 9 4.3 Conducted Spurious Emissions at Antenna Terminals (FCC Part §2.1051) ................ 13 4.4 Radiated Spurious Emissions: (FCC Part §2.1053) …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Setting up of the instruments for testing. 1. Figure 1 & 2 is the connecting of the Spectrum Analyser to the TRX. 2. Figure 3&4 is the connecting of the Peak Power Meter to the TRX. Fig.1. Fig.2. Fig.3. Fig.4.

Test Setup Photos ©2008 Washington Laboratories, Ltd FCC ID: XOP-5840-SL-3000 Conducted 1 Test Setup Photos ©2008 Washington Laboratories, Ltd FCC ID: XOP-5840-SL-3000 Conducted 2 Test Setup Photos ©2008 Washington Laboratories, Ltd FCC ID: XOP-5840-SL-3000 Frequency Stability