2BSUV-01-00040-03Firearm

Rev 1/26/2023 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Date: 02-13-2026 Ref: Attestation Statements Part 2.911(d)(7) Filing FCC ID or Grantee Code: 2BSUV-01-00040-03 Lodestar Technology Inc (“the applicant”) certifies that, as of the date of the filing of the application, we designate ourselves as the U.S. agent for service of process. Designated U.S. Agent Information: FRN: 0037298353 Name: Ginger Chandler Address: 481 West 45 th Street, Suite 100, Chattanooga, TN 38410, USA Contact Person: Ginger Chandler Tel.: (860) 214-5280 Email: [email protected] Sincerely, Virginia Chandler CTO and Cofounder

Rev 1/26/2023 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Date: 10/18/2025 Ref: Attestation Statements Part 2.911(d)(5)(i) Filing FCC ID: 2BSUV-01-00040-03 Lodestar Technology Inc (“the applicant”) certifies that the equipment for which authorization is sought is not “covered” equipment prohibited from receiving an equipment authorization pursuant to section 2.903 of the FCC rules. Lodestar Technology Inc (“the applicant”) certifies that the equipment for which authorization is sought does not include cybersecurity or anti-virus software produced or provided by Kaspersky Lab, Inc. or any of its successors and assignees, including equipment with integrated Kaspersky Lab, Inc. (or any of its successors and assignees) cybersecurity or anti-virus software pursuant to DA-24-886 and KDB 986446 D01 Covered Equipment Guidance section B(2a). Device is inherently compliant based on hardware limitations or software controls. or A Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is provided to the TCB for review, and The end-user or third parties cannot install additional software on this device. Sincerely, Virginia Chandler Rev 1/26/2023 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Date: 10/18/2025 Ref: Attestation Statements Part 2.911(d)(5)(ii) Filing FCC ID: 2BSUV-01-00040-03 Lodestar Technology Inc (“the applicant”) certifies that, as of the date of the filing of the application, the applicant is not identified on the Covered List (as a specifically named entity or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) as an entity producing “covered” equipment. Sincerely, Virginia Chandler

Date 1/28/2026 Federal Communications Commission Equipment Authorization Branch 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Confidentiality Request FCC ID: 2BSUV-01-00040-03 Pursuant to Sections 0.457(d)(1)(ii) and 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, Lodestar Technology Inc. hereby requests permanent confidential treatment of information accompanying this application as outlined below: Schematics Bill of Materials/Parts List Block Diagrams Theory of Operation Lodestar Technology Inc hereby requests short-term confidential treatment of information accompanying this application as outlined below for a period of period of 60 days: Internal Photos External Photos User Manual Test Set-up Photographs The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the Applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Applicant understands that pursuant to Rule 0.457(d)(1)(ii), disclosure of this Application and all accompanying materials will not be made before the date of the Grant for this Application. Yours sincerely, Name: Title: Virginia Chandler CTO and Co-founder

Date: (19/02/2026) Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Dear Sir or Madam, We, Lodestar Technology Inc (“the applicant”), hereby authorize Hoosamuddin Bandukwala of H.B. Compliance Solutions, 5005 S. Ash Avenue, Suite A-10, Tempe AZ-85282 and Jesse Snyder of 28Gorilla to act as our agent in all matters relating to applications for equipment authorization, including the signing of all documents relating to these matters. Yours sincerely, Name: Virginia Chandler Title: Co-Founder and CTO

Regarding the placement of the FCC ID on the handgun itself, this falls under the FCC’s allowance for alternative labeling when permanent physical labeling is impractical. In this case, placing an FCC ID directly on the firearm presents multiple issues that make on- product marking impractical, including: • Functional and safety constraints: Firearms have limited non-critical surfaces, and adding markings to structural components can interfere with operation, durability, or safety. • Regulatory and legal considerations: Firearms are already subject to strict marking requirements under the Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), and introducing additional permanent markings can create conflicts or compliance complications. (Mainly that the ATFs Serial number can not be mistaken for another marking) • Durability and legibility concerns: Any marking applied to a handgun would be subject to abrasion, heat, solvents, and wear, making long-term legibility unreliable. • Manufacturing impact: Adding FCC-specific markings would require additional processing steps that are not consistent with standard firearm manufacturing practices and could adversely affect finish quality or tolerances. Because of these factors, permanently affixing the FCC ID to the device itself is not reasonable or practical. As permitted by FCC labeling rules, the FCC ID is therefore provided in the user manual, where it is clearly visible, durable, and accessible to the end user. This approach satisfies the FCC’s identification requirements while avoiding the risks and complications associated with on-product firearm marking. Illustration of firearm temporary FCC ID label:

Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of H.B Compliance Solutions, LLC. FCC SAR Exclusion Report For the Lodestar Technology LNK9 February 2, 2026 Prepared for: Lodestar Technology, Inc. 481 W 45 th St. Chattanooga, TN 3841085027 Prepared By: H.B. Compliance Solutions 5005 S. Ash Avenue, Suite # A-10 Tempe, Arizona 85282 Reviewed By: Hoosamuddin Bandukwala Cert # ATL-0062-E HBCS SAR Exclusion Test Report # EMC_25042_4 Page 2 of 5 1. Equipment Overview Product Name: LNK9 Model(s) Tested: N/A FCC ID: 2BSUV-01-00040-03 Supply Voltage Input: Primary Power: +12VDC Frequency Range: 2402-2480 MHz No. of Channels: Bluetooth Low Energy specification Type(s) of Modulation: GFSK Range of Operation Power: 0.00037W Emission Designator: N/A Channel Spacing(s) 2 MHz Test Item: Pre-Production Type of Equipment: Mobile Antenna Requirement (§15.203) : Type of Antenna: Chip Antenna Gain of Antenna: 2.3dBi Environmental Test Conditions: Temperature: 15-35⁰C Humidity: 30-60% Barometric Pressure: 860-1060 mbar Modification to the EUT: None HBCS SAR Exclusion Test Report # EMC_25042_4 Page 3 of 5 2. Applicable Standard Standalone SAR Test Exclusion Consideration According to KDB447498 D01 General RF Exposure Guidance v06 4.3.1. Standalone SAR test exclusion considerations Unless specifically required by the published RF exposure KDB procedures, standalone 1-g head or body and 10-g extremity SAR evaluation for general population exposure conditions, by measurement or numerical simulation, is not required when the corresponding SAR Exclusion Threshold condition, listed below, is satisfied. Limits Table 1: SAR test exclusion threshold 100MHz -6GHz for ≤50MM HBCS SAR Exclusion Test Report # EMC_25042_4 Page 4 of 5 The 1-g and 10-g SAR test exclusion thresholds for 100 MHz to 6 GHz at test separation distances ≤ 50 mm are determined by: where ・ f(GHz) is the RF channel transmit frequency in GHz ・ Power and distance are rounded to the nearest mW and mm before calculation ・ The result is rounded to one decimal place for comparison The test exclusions are applicable only when the minimum test separation distance is ≤ 50 mm and for transmission frequencies between 100 MHz and 6 GHz. When the minimum test separation distance is < 5 mm, a distance of 5 mm is applied to determine SAR test exclusion HBCS SAR Exclusion Test Report # EMC_25042_4 Page 5 of 5 3. Test Results To solve for the EIRP; General RF Exposure = (0.366 / 5 mm) x √2.48 GHz = 0.366 ① SAR 1g extremity requirement: S= 3.0 ② ; ① < ②. Therefore SAR report is not required. Frequency (GHz) Separation Distance (mm) Max Power + Tolerance (dBm) Max Power + Tolerance (mW) SAR Calculation Result Limit for Exclusion threshold SAR Evaluation 2.480 5.0 -4.36 0.366 0.115 3.0 SAR Exempt Transmit power is less than power indicated in table 1 and the result of the above condition is less than 3. Based on this the transmitter is exempted from SAR evaluation. END OF TEST REPORT

Lodestar LNK9 Firearm Antenna Exhibits 28-02-00002-01 Pub. 10 February 2026 SECTION 1 | GENERAL DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 3 [Lodestar] – LNK9 FIREARM ANTENNA EXHIBITS 1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This document presents the antenna exhibits for the Bluetooth antenna integrated on the LNK9 firearm main board for the Lodestar LNK9 project. It provides the relevant performance characteristics as implemented in the firearm hardware. These exhibits are intended to document and substantiate the antenna implementation for review, validation, and compliance purposes within the scope of the LNK9 project. 2 EXHIBITS 2.1 BLUETOOTH ANTENNA 2.2 Figure 1: Bluetooth antenna characteristics plot 1 Lodestar LNK9 Firearm Antenna Exhibits 28-02-00002-01 Pub. 10 February 2026 SECTION 2 | EXHIBITS Page 2 of 3 Figure 2: Bluetooth antenna characteristics plot 2 Lodestar LNK9 Firearm Antenna Exhibits 28-02-00002-01 Pub. 10 February 2026 SECTION 2 | EXHIBITS Page 3 of 3 Figure 3: Bluetooth antenna characteristics plot 3

Certificates and reports shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of H.B Compliance Solutions, LLC. Intentional Radiator Test Report For the Lodestar Technology, Inc. LNK9 Tested under The FCC Rules contained in Title 47 of the CFR, Part 15.247 for Digitally Transmitting Sequence Prepared for: Lodestar Technology, Inc. 481 W 45th St Chattanooga, TN 38410 Prepared By: H.B. Compliance Solutions 5005 S. Ash Avenue, Suite # A-10 Tempe, Arizona 85282 Reviewed By: Hoosamuddin Bandukwala Cert # ATL-0062-E Engineering Statement: The measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedure indicated, and the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the limits applicable. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements, and for the qualifications of all persons taking them. It is further stated that upon the basis of the measurement made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements of Part 15 of the FCC Rules under normal use and maintenance. All results contained herein relate only to the sample tested. HBCS Report # RF_25042_1 Page 2 of 37 Report Status Sheet Revision # Report Date Reason for Revision Ø December 15, 2025 Initial Issue HBCS Report # RF_25042_1 Page 3 of 37 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 4 1. Testing Summary ....................................................................................... 4 EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION ................................................................................ 5 1. Overview ................................................................................................... 5 2. Test Facility ............................................................................................... 6 3. Description of Test Sample ........................................................................ 7 4. Equipment Configuration .......................................................................... 7 5. Support Equipment ................................................................................... 7 6. Ports and Cabling Information ................................................................... 7 7. Method of Monitoring EUT Operation ...................................................... 8 8. Mode of Operation .................................................................................... 8 9. Modifications ............................................................................................ 8 10. Disposition of EUT ..................................................................................... 8 Criteria for Un-Intentional Radiators ...................................................................... 9 1. Radiated Emissions .................................................................................... 9 Emissions Tests Calculations ...................................................................... 10 Criteria for Intentional Radiators .......................................................................... 13 1. Occupied Bandwidth ............................................................................... 13 2. RF Power Output ..................................................................................... 17 3. Conducted Spurious Emissions ................................................................ 20 4. Radiated Spurious Emissions and Restricted Band .................................. 28 6. Emissions At Band Edges ......................................................................... 31 7. Power Spectral Density ........................................................................... 33 8. Test Equipment ............................................................................................. 36 9. Measurement Uncertainty ............................................................................ 37 HBCS Report # RF_25042_1 Page 4 of 37 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Testing Summary These tests were conducted on a sample of the equipment for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with Part 15.247. All tests were conducted using measurement procedure from ANSI C63.10-2020 and FCC Guidance document 558074 D01 v05r02 April 02, 2019 as appropriate. Test Name Test Method/Standard Result Comments Unintentional Radiated Emissions 15.109 Pass A/C Powerline Conducted Emissions 15.207 N/A Battery Powered Device Occupied Bandwidth 15.247(a)(2) Pass Peak Output Power 15.247(b) Pass Conducted Spurious Emissions 15.247(d) Pass Radiated Spurious Emissions & Restricted Band 15.247(d), 15.209(a), 15.205 Pass Emissions at Band Edges 15.247(d), 15.209(a), 15.205 Pass Power Spectral Density 15.247(e) Pass HBCS Report # RF_25042_1 Page 5 of 37 EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION 1. Overview H.B Compliance Solutions was contracted by Lodestar Technology, Inc. to perform testing on the LNK9 under the quotation number Q25091001. This document describes the test setups, test methods, required test equipment, and the test limit criteria used to perform compliance testing of the Lodestar Technology, Inc., LNK9. The tests were based on FCC Part 15 Rules. The tests described in this document were formal tests as described with the objective of the testing was to evaluate compliance of the Equipment Under Test (EUT) to the requirements of the aforementioned specifications. Lodestar Technology, Inc. should retain a copy of this document and it should be kept on file for at least five years after the manufacturing of the EUT has been permanently discontinued. The results obtained relate only to the item(s) tested. Product Name: LNK9 Model(s) Tested: N/A FCC ID: 2BSUV-01-00040-03 Supply Voltage Input: Primary Power: +3.6 VDC Frequency Range: 2402MHz - 2480MHz No. of Channels: Bluetooth Low Energy Specification Necessary Bandwidth N/A Type(s) of Modulation: GFSK (Bluetooth BLE) Range of Operation Power: 0…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.