APYHRO00022Cellular Transceiver

USER GUIDE SHARP Model TQ-CX1 Safety Information and Usage Guideline Exposure to Radio Frequency Signals Your wireless handheld portable telephone is a low power radio transmitter and receiver. When it is ON, it receives and also sends out radio frequency (RF) signals. In August 1996, the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) adopted RF exposure guidelines with safety levels for hand-held wireless phones. Those guidelines are consistent with the safety standards previously set by both U.S. and international standards bodies: • ANSI C95.1 (1992) *1 • NCRP Report 86 (1986) *2 • ICNIRP (1996) *3 Those standards were based on comprehensive and periodic evaluations of the relevant scientific literature. For example, over 120 scientists, engineers, and physicians from universities, government health agencies, and industry reviewed the available body of research to develop the ANSI Standard (C95.1). The design of your phone complies with the FCC guidelines (and those standards). z To maintain compliance with FCC RF exposure guideline, if you wear a handset on your body use the Sharp supplied or approved holster. If you do not use a body-worn accessory, ensure the antenna is at least one inch (2.54 centimeters ) from your body when transmitting. Use of non-Sharp accessories may violate FCC RF exposure guidelines. *1 American National Standards Institute *2 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements *3 International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Phone Operation Normal Position: Hold the phone as you would any other telephone. Tips on Efficient Operation: For your phone to operate most efficiently: • Do not touch the antenna unnecessarily when the phone is in use. Contact with the antenna affects call quality and may cause the phone to operate at a higher power level than otherwise needed. Batteries Caution: All batteries can cause property damage, injury or burns if a conductive material, such as jewelry, keys or beaded chains, touches exposed terminals. The material may complete an electrical circuit and become quite hot. To protect against such unwanted current drain, exercise care in handling any charged battery, particularly when placing it inside your pocket, purse or other container with metal objects. When the battery is detached from the phone, please use any un-conductive material cover such as small poly bag : for storing your battery when not in use. Driving Check the laws and regulations on the use of wireless telephone in the areas where you drive. Always obey them. Also, if using your phone while driving, please: • Give full attention to driving - driving safely is your first responsibility. • Use hands-free operation, if available. • Pull off the road and park before making or answering a call if driving conditions so require. Pacemakers The Health Industry Manufacturers Association recommends that a minimum separation of six (6") inches be maintained between a handheld wireless phone and a pacemaker to avoid potential interference with the pacemaker. These recommendations are consistent with the independent research by and recommendations of Wireless Technology Research. Persons with pacemakers: • Should ALWAYS keep the phone more than six (6") inches from their pacemaker when the phone is turned ON. • Should not carry the phone in a breast pocket. • Should use the ear opposite the pacemaker to minimize the potential for interference. • If you have any reason to suspect that interference is taking place, turn your phone OFF immediately. Hearing Aids Some digital wireless phones may interfere with some hearing aids. In the event of such interference, you may want to consult your hearing aid manufacturer to discuss alternatives. Other Medical Devices If you use any other personal medical device, consult the manufacturer of your device to determine if they are adequately shielded from external RF energy. Your physician may be able to assist you in obtaining this information. Turn your phone OFF in health care facilities when any regulations posted in these areas instruct you to do so. Hospitals or health care facilities may be using equipment that could be sensitive to external RF energy. Vehicles Equipped with Air Bags An air bag inflates with great force. DO NOT place objects, including both installed or portable wireless equipment, in the area over the air bag or in the air bag deployment area. If in-vehicle wireless equipment is improperly installed and the air bag inflates, serious injury could result. Phone Care Your phone is designed for excellent durability under normal use conditions. Protect your phone from water damage that could result from spills or excessive exposure to rain. Never submerge your wireless phone. Cleaning the Phone Cleaning of this product should only be done with a damp cloth. The use of chemical cleaners may harm the finish and integrity of the radio housing and is not recommended. All about performance and safety Keeping tabs on signal strength If you’re inside a building, reception may be better near a window. The quality of each call you make or receive depends on the signal strength in your immediate area. When turned on, your phone will always give you a visual indication of the signal strength in your immediate area. The visual indicator is always in the upper left corner of your display and is referred to as the signal strength indicator: [ ]. More lines indicate more signal strength. Four lines indicate maximum strength and one line indicates least strength. Understanding Power Save mode If you’re trying to use your Phone in an area where the signal is too weak, the Power Save feature will be automatically activated to conserve battery power when you’ve been unable to pick up a signal for 15 minutes. If your phone is in Power Save Mode, it will periodically recheck service availability or you can do so yourself manually by pressing any key. A message will be displayed on the screen any time Power Save has been…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Sharp Corporation TEL: (81) 824-20-1653 Communication Systems Group FAX: (81) 824-20-1654 2-13-1 Iida Hachihonmatsu Higashihiroshima-City Hiroshima 739-0192 Japan AFFIDAVIT FOR ESN PROTECTION OF CELLULAR MOBILE TELEPHONES We hereby certify that the Handheld Portable Cellular Telephone, FCC ID: APYHRO00022 is so designed that it complies with all the requirements for ESN protection specified in Section 22.919. a) The transmitter in service has a unique ESN. b) The ESN host component is permanently attached to a main circuit board of the mobile transmitter and the integrity of the unit operating software cannot be altered. The ESN is plated from fraudulent contact and tampering. The ESN is encoded using multiplication by a polynomial and the ESN data programmed in the memory with other information. c) The ESN is factory – set and cannot be altered, transferred, removed or otherwise able to be manipulated. Cellular mobile equipment is specifically designed such that any attempt to remove, tamper with, or change the ESN chip, its logic system, or firmware originally programmed by manufacturer will render the mobile transmitter inoperative. Sincerely, Date: April 23 rd , 2001 Fumikazu Nagano Department General Manager A1212 Project Communication Systems Group Sharp Corporation

Sharp Corporation TEL: (81) 824-20-1653 Communication Systems Group FAX: (81) 824-20-1654 2-13-1 Iida Hachihonmatsu Higashihiroshima-City Hiroshima 739-0192 Japan April 23 rd , 2001 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Equipment Authorization Branch 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 To whom it may concern: We, the undersigned, hereby authorize Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc., to act as on our agent in behalf of all matters relating to applications for equipment authorization, including the signing of all documents relating to these matters. Any and all acts carried out by Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc. on our behalf shall have the same effect as acts of our own. We also hereby certify that no party to this application is subject to a denial of benefits, including FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. 853 (a) Sincerely, Fumikazu Nagano Department General Manager A1212 Project Communication Systems Group Sharp Corporation

Sharp Corporation TEL: (81) 824-20-1653 Communication Systems Group FAX: (81) 824-20-1654 2-13-1 Iida Hachihonmatsu Higashihiroshima-City Hiroshima 739-0192 Japan April 23 rd , 2001 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Equipment Authorization Branch 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 SUBJECT: SHARP CORPORATION FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Tri – mode (dual band / dual mode cellular phone, AMPS/CDMA/PCS) Request for Confidentiality Gentlemen: In accordance with 0.459 of CFR 47, Sharp Corporation hereby requests confidentiality of the Block Diagram (Attachment C), Schematic Diagrams (Attachment D, E, F, G) and Tune-up/Alignment Procedure (Attachment L) in the attached test report. These documents contain detailed system and equipment description and related information about the product, which Sharp Corporation considers to be proprietary, confidential, and a custom design and, otherwise would not release to the general public. Since this design is a basis from which future technological products will evolve, Sharp Corporation considers this information to be of benefit to its competitors, and that the disclosure of the information in these documents would give competitors an unfair advantage in the market. Sincerely, Fumikazu Nagano Department General Manager A1212 Project Communication Systems Group Sharp Corporation

Ref: FCC ID: APYHRO00022, Confirmation Number: EA101556 Correspondence Reference No: 20376, This is in response to your mail dated Aug24, 2001; Paraphrased answers to your questions are below 1. SAR distribution plots are resubmitted herewith. 2. SAR Tissue parameters for PCS band The conductivity ( σ ) of the brain and muscle tissue of the simulating liquid we have used are higher than the FCC recommended values. The permittivity is in the tolerance limits of FCC recommended guidelines. Higher conductivity shall result in higher SAR reading (if permittivity remains the same). The highest reported SAR for Brain is 1.18 mW/g (plot #40, for Right side Two Touch, 1850MHz) is well below the limit. In any case SAR of the device would not exceed the FCC specified limit . 3. The following are the lowest and highest Channels for CDMA operation: a) Part 22, Cellular Band, CDMA Mode: Lowest channel: 824.70 MHz, See Plot # 7.3.4.a–7.3.4.f for out-of-band emissions; Highest Channel: 848.31MHz, See Plot # 7.3.6.a–7.3.6.e for out-of-band emissions; b) Part 24, PCS Band CDMA Mode: Lowest channel: 1851.25 MHz, See Plot # 7.3.7.a –7.3.7.f for out-of-band emissions; Highest Channel: 1908.75MHz, See Plot # 7.3.9.a–7.3.9.h for out-of-band emissions. 4. FCC form731 is amended to show frequency correctly

EXTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 EXTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 EXTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 EXTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 EXTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 EXTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 EXTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 EXTERNAL PHOTO BELT CLIP FCC ID: APYHRO00022

INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022 INTERNAL PHOTO FCC ID: APYHRO00022

Sharp Corporation TEL: (81) 824-20-1653 Communication Systems Group FAX: (81) 824-20-1654 2-13-1 Iida Hachihonmatsu Higashihiroshima-City Hiroshima 739-0192 Japan April 23 rd , 2001 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Equipment Authorization Branch 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 SUBJECT: SHARP CORPORATION FCC ID: APYHRO00022 FCC E911 Requirements Per S22.921 Gentlemen: Sharp Corporation hereby certifies that the cellular telephone ( FCC ID : APYHRO00022 ), using the Automatic A / B Roaming Intelligent Retry method, meets the requirements specified in Section 22.921 of the rules. This procedure recognizes when a “ 9 – 1 – 1 “ call is made and, at such time, will override any programming in the mobile unit that determines the handling of a non 911 call and permit the call to be handled by other analog carriers. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned by phone or email at [email protected] Fumikazu Nagano Department General Manager A1212 Project Communication Systems Group Sharp Corporation

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637164FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637165FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637166FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637167FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637168FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637169FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637170FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637171FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637172FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637173FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637174FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637175FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637176FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637177FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637178FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637179FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637180FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation APPENDIX B - E-Field Probe Calibration Data See attached pages. 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637181FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637182FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637183FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637184FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637185FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637186FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637187FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637188FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637134FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation APPENDIX A - SAR Evaluation Data Please note that the graphical visualization of the phone position onto the SAR distribution gives only limited information on the current distribution of the device, since the curvature of the head results in graphical distortion. Full information can only be obtained either by H-field scans in free space or SAR evaluation with a flat phantom. Powerdrift is the measurement of power drift of the device over one complete SAR scan. 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637135FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637136FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637137FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637138FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637139FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637140FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637141FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637142FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637143FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637144FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637145FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637146FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637147FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637148FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637149FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637150FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637151FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637152FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637153FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637154FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637155FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637156FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637157FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637158FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637159FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637160FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637161FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 2046637162FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 204663711FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0JOB DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................2 1.1Client Information.............................................................................................2 1.2Equipment under test (EUT).............................................................................2 1.3 Test plan reference.............................................................................................3 1.4System test configuration..................................................................................3 1.4.1 System block diagram & Support equipment........................................3 1.4.2 Test Position for Brain..........................................................................4 1.4.3 Test Position for Muscle.......................................................................5 1.4.4 Test Condition......................................................................................5 1.5Modifications required for compliance..............................................................6 1.6Additions, deviations and exclusions from standards.........................................7 2.0SAR EVALUATION..................................................................................................8 2.1SAR Limits.......................................................................................................8 2.2Configuration Photographs...............................................................................9 2.3System Verification........................................................................................19 2.4Evaluation Procedures....................................................................................19 2.5Test Results....................................................................................................20 3.0EQUIPMENT...........................................................................................................25 3.1Equipment List...............................................................................................25 3.1Tissue Simulating Liquid................................................................................26 3.3E-Field Probe Calibration...............................................................................29 3.4Measurement Uncertainty...............................................................................30 3.5Measurement Traceability...............................................................................30 4.0WARNING LABEL INFORMATION - USA.........................................................31 5.0REFERENCES.........................................................................................................32 6.0Document History.....................................................................................................33 APPENDIX A - SAR Evaluation Data................................................................................34 APPENDIX B - E-Field Probe Calibration Data................................................................80 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 204663712FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1.0 JOB DESCRIPTION 1.1 Client Information The EUT has been tested at the request of: Company:Sharp Labs of America. Address:5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas WA 98607 USA Name of contact:Mr. Tom Potten Telephone: (360) 817-8536 Fax:(360) 834-8696 1.2 Equipment under test (EUT) Product Descriptions: Equipment Tri-Mode Cellular Phone Trade NameSharp Labs of AmericaModel No:SHARP TQ-CX1 FCC ID APYHRO00022 S/N No.Not Labeled Category Portable RF ExposureUncontrolled Environment Frequency Band824 – 849 MHz - AMPS 824 – 849 MHz - CDMA 1850 – 1910 MHz - CDMA SystemAMPS, CDMA EUT Antenna Descriptions Antenna Type: Gain: Monopole 0 dBi Use of Product:Wireless Voice/Data communications Manufacturer:Sharp Labs of America Production is planned[X ] Yes, [ ] No EUT receive date:March 19, 2001 EUT received condition:Prototype in good condition. Test start date:April 25, 2001 Test end date:April 28, 2001 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 204663713FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1.3 Test plan reference FCC rule part 2.1093, FCC Docket 96-326 & Supplement C to OET Bulletin 65 1.4System test configuration 1.4.1 System block diagram & Support equipment The EUT was tested without the need for support equipment. EUT 1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs of America, Model No: SHARP TQ-CX1Date of Test: April 26 to June 6, 2001 FCC ID: APYHRO00022 Report # 204663714FCC Part 2 SAR Evaluation 1.4.2 Test Position for Brain The SHARP TQ-CX1 was configured for testing in a typical fashion (as a customer would normally use it), and in the confines as outlined in C95.1 (1992) and Supplement C of OET 65 (1998). The SHARP TQ-CX1 was placed in the intended use position, i.e. CENELEC 80 o position. This position is defined by a reference plane and a line. The reference plane of the head is given by three points, the auditory canal opening of both ears and center of the closed mouth. The reference line of the SHARP TQ-CX1 is defined by the line, which connects the center of the ear piece with the center of the bottom of the case and lies on the surface of the case facing the phantom. The reference line of the SHARP TQ-CX1 lies in the reference plane of the head. The center of the ear-piece of the SHARP TQ-CX1 is placed at the entry of the auditory canal. The angle between the reference line of the phone and the line connecting both auditory canal openings is 80 o . Please refer to…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

1365 Adams Court, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Sharp Labs, CDMA/AMPS Cellular Phone Date of Test: April 25-28 & Jun10-15,2001 FCC ID: AHYRO00022 Report # 20466372 1 FCC Part 22 & 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0Introduction..............................................................................................................3 1.1Test Summary...................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.