AXATR-421-A2Dual Mode TDMA Cellular Transceiver

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 December 18, 2001 RE: Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications FCC ID: AXATR-421-A2 I have a few comments on this Application. 1. Please provide an FRN for this Applicant. 0005-0294-00 2. Please provide an owners manual for this Application. Additional questions may arise as a result after review of this document. Please refer to uploaded Manual. 3. Error uncertainty analysis was not addressed in the SAR report. The uncertainty is provided in the test report (section 3.1) along with a reference to the “SAR Measurement Specification of Wireless Handsets” document, in which the full uncertainty budget is provided (section 7). 4. A boundary interpolation plot is required. This is provided in the addendum 5. Other than the 1400mAh and 750mAh batteries, were there any other accessories which may affect SAR values? It is unusual for Cellular phones to not have an earpiece or headphone. The earpiece was tested with the device (see section 6.2 and photos in Appendix 4). 6. Please provide an “affirmative Statement of Compliance” for RF Exposure [47CFR 2.909] This is given on page 1 of the test report, under the title “Statement of Compliance” 7. Please provide ESN attestation. Please see cover letter for ESN Attestation 8. Please provide Cellular System compatibility attestation [47CFR 22.933} Please see cover letter for Cellular System Compatibility. 9. Please identify distance of phone to phantom (excluding belt clip) for body worn operations. For body worn operations, the device is placed flat against a flat phantom with a 2mm thick shell. The thickness of the carry accessory is 23mm. Therefore, at the clip the distance from the device to the liquid is 25mm. This is illustrated in the addendum. 10. Please identify construction of belt clip(s) used with this device. The carry accessory consists of a leather/plastic case and a belt clip which attaches to it. The clip is made of metal and plastic. 11. Please provide information on probe response to TDMA signals. z Page 2 December 18, 2001 This information is provided in the addendum. 12. Was before and after RF conducted RF Power Output measurements performed after each run? Conducted power was measured prior to the start of SAR testing. For each test, reference SAR measurements were made before and after. The drift (difference between the two measurements) was always verified to be within 5%. The drift values can be seen on the plots. The FCC has clarified that this is an acceptable practice (see attached document “Round2- Supplement-C-Responses3.doc”). 13. Does the phantom conform to current recommendations of SCC-34/SC-2 and as described in IEEE P1528. The phantom is designed to meet these specifications. This is stated in section 5.2 of the “SAR Measurement Specification of Wireless Handsets.” Additional information is provided in the addendum. 14. The actual composition of ingredients used for the tissue material is required. This is given in Annex A of the “SAR Measurement Specification of Wireless Handsets.” 15. A description of the dielectric holder and positioning procedures used to evaluate the highest exposure expected is required. The holder and positioning procedures are stated in “SAR Measurement Specification of Wireless Handsets” (sections 5.5 and 6.1). 16. A description of both the course and fine scan procedures and interpolation procedures are required. See “SAR Measurement Specification of Wireless Handsets” (Annex C) 17. This device uses a unique antenna. It is reasonable to ask if this device was rotated and tested in three orthogonal planes. “through three orthogonal planes” was added to section 4.1 test procedure and similar test procedure added to section 5.1. 18. Transmitter radiated spurious data was only performed on the low channel. There is no problem with testing one frequency, but it must be a middle channel not a band edge. Please supply additional test data ad mid-band. Since TDMA produced the higher ERP, it should be shown in TDMA in addition to AMPS. The test was performed at the operating frequency of maximum power output. Radiated test data for TDMA mode were provided on page 10 section 5.2. Additionally, the middle and high channels harmonic frequencies were investigated to determine the worst-case emission levels. 19. It is not possible to read the annotation on the Tx Spurs in Rx Critical Band plots. Enlarged plots are provided to view annotations 20. Ideally, TDMA signals should use the same 30KHz channels as AMPS. Please provide a TDMA Occupied BW with the AMPS mask on a 100KHz span. The annotation on the one supplied is unreadable. A new plot was provided with a 100kHz SPAN and AMPS mask. This plot was the 99% occupied bandwidth only. 21. During temperature testing, was transmitter switched off during increments from -30 to +60? FYI: Only one mid- channel temperature test for AMPS and TDMA is required. No, it was not, wording was changed in section 9.1 z Page 3 December 18, 2001 22. Modulation limiting graphs are difficult to read. Please do not depend on color – these are legal documents where black and white always has preference. Show only 300, 1000, and 2500Hz. The audio input scale is missing from the deviation limiting plots. The annotation is difficult to read New plots were taken in black and white of 300, 1000, and 2500 Hz, added audio input scale for each tick mark. Enlarged to enable better viewing of annotation. 23. Rated system deviation for voice is misidentified. Correct deviation is 12KHz. This would affect results of modulation limiting. Please note that 12KHz is what you specified in your necessary bandwidth calculations.[22.915(b)] Re-measured rated system deviation for voice, and corrected deviation to 12 kHz 24. There is nothing ion the report which identifies the lowest power setting of this equipment. Please provide conducted RF Pout data at lowest power setting. EUT has integral antenna with no ext…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 December 5, 2001 RE: Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications FCC ID: AXATR-421-A2 I have a few comments on this Application. 1.) Please provide an FRN for this Applicant. 2.) Please provide an owners manual for this Application. Additional questions may arise as a result after review of this document. 3.) Error uncertainty analysis was not addressed in the SAR report. 4.) A boundary interpolation plot is required. 5.) Other than the 1400mAh and 750mAh batteries, were there any other accessories which may affect SAR values? It is unusual for Cellular phones to not have an earpiece or headphone. 6.) Please provide an “affirmative Statement of Compliance” for RF Exposure [47CFR 2.909] 7.) Please provide ESN attestation. 8.) Please provide Cellular System compatibility attestation [47CFR 22.933} 9.) Please identify distance of phone to phantom (excluding belt clip) for body worn operations. 10.)Please identify construction of belt clip(s) used with this device. 11.)Please provide information on probe response to TDMA signals. 12.)Was before and after RF conducted RF Power Output measurements performed after each run? 13.)Does the phantom conform to current recommendations of SCC-34/SC-2 and as described in IEEE P1528? 14.)The actual composition of ingredients used for the tissue material is required. 15.)A description of the dielectric holder and positioning procedures used to evaluate the highest exposure expected is required. 16.) A description of both the course and fine scan procedures and interpolation procedures are required. 17.)This device uses a unique antenna. It is reasonable to ask if this device was rotated and tested in three orthogonal planes. 18.)Transmitter radiated spurious data was only performed on the low channel. There is no problem with testing one frequency, but it must be a middle channel not a band edge. Please supply additional test data ad mid-band. Since TDMA produced the higher ERP, it should be shown in TDMA in addition to AMPS. 19.)It is not possible to read the annotation on the Tx Spurs in Rx Critical Band plots. 20.)Ideally, TDMA signals should use the same 30KHz channels as AMPS. Please provide a TDMA Occupied BW with the AMPS mask on a 100KHz span. The annotation on the one supplied is unreadable. 21.)During temperature testing, was transmitter switched off during increments from -30 to +60? FYI: Only one mid-channel temperature test for AMPS and TDMA is required. l Page 2 December 5, 2001 22.)Modulation limiting graphs are difficult to read. Please do not depend on color – these are legal documents where black and white always has preference. Show only 300, 1000, and 2500Hz. The audio input scale is missing from the deviation limiting plots. The annotation is difficult to read 23.)Rated system deviation for voice is misidentified. Correct deviation is 12KHz. This would affect results of modulation limiting. Please note that 12KHz is what you specified in your necessary bandwidth calculations.[22.915(b)] 24.)There is nothing ion the report which identifies the lowest power setting of this equipment. Please provide conducted RF Pout data at lowest power setting. William H. Graff President and Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Engineering and Testing for EMC and Safety Compliance 360 Herndon Parkway, Suite 1400 Herndon, VA 20170 Phone: 703-689-0368; Fax: 703-689-2056; Metro: 703-471-6441 November 29, 2001 Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 To Whom It May Concern: The following information is to be held confidential pursuant of 47 CFR Part 0 §0.457 and Section 552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act, because the information provided contains trade secrets and proprietary. If made public, the information might be used to the disadvantage of the applicant in the market place. • Schematics • Product Description • Block Diagram • Bill of Materials (Parts List) Best Regards, Melissa Carter [email protected] Rhein Tech Laboratories, Inc.

To: William Graff From: Andy Leimer [email protected] FCC Equipment Authorization Branch Re: FCC ID: AXATR-421-A2 Applicant: Ericsson Inc Correspondence Reference Number: 3431 731 Confirmation Number: TC758957 Date of Original Email: 01/11/2002 Subject: ERP and SAR 1. Semantics: SAR report pg 3 (25) lists Duty Cycle = 3, should be Duty cycle = 1/3, crest factor = 3. The statement is correct, Duty Cycle should be replaced by Crest Factor or "3" should be substituted by "1/3". Please see correction in updated report. 2. Prefer to have date-of-test listed on all SAR plots. Please see updated report. 3. Report should include comments/description of how and why final SAR is “Calculated to max. power.” The SAR is calculated to maximum output power by scaling all SAR numbers by the ratio of maximum peak output power (26.25 dBm) to the peak output power in the center of the band. This procedure is followed since, in production, the output power of the phones is calibrated to the center of the band. 4. pg 6 (25) says “For 800 TDMA mode, the maximum power is significantly lower than that of AMPS mode, therefore SAR values are also lower and not listed.” pg 3 (25) shows 26.25 max power for both AMPS and TDMA. Please submit TDMA-mode SAR data. The maximum average output power, which is the one relevant for SAR, in AMPS mode is 26.25 dBm. In TDMA mode, due to the 1/3 duty cycle, the average power would be 1/3 of the linear value of 26.25 dBm. Therefore, this would result in a significantly lower SAR. 5. 900 MHz head and body probe factors were used for 835 MHz-band testing. Please provide analysis of expected change in SAR if 835 MHz ConvF’s were used. SAR would not change since the conversion factor is valid in the frequency range 750 MHz-1000MHz. Please see below screen capture plot of the conversion factor menu. 6. Semantics: procedure pg 6 (14) refers to “extended uncertainty,” prefer “expanded uncertainty” per ISO GUM. "Expanded uncertainty" will be used in future filings. 7. Procedure pg 7 (14) refers to “laboratory setup” influence quantity. This does not seem to be in draft IEEE Std 1528. Please describe. Please refer to annex X3.1.2 Source Uncertainty : " The measurement protocols in Annex E5.1 requires that this type of source uncertainty be 3% or less with monitoring and periodic site evaluation." 8) Correct the ERP on the Grant for AMPS mode. The Test Report lists ERP as 0.275 Watts. The ERP is 0.275 Watts The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 30 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 2.917©. DO NOT Reply to this email by using the Reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at www.fcc.gov , E-Filing, OET TCB Electronic Filing, TCB Login. If the response is submitted through Add Attachments, a message which informs the processing staff that a new exhibit has been submitted must also be submitted via Submit Correspondence. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the e-mail address listed below the name of the sender.

Antenna Front View Antenna Rear View Chassis Front View

APPLICANT:Exhibit 1 FCC ID NO: ERICSSON INCAXATR-421-A2 ©2001 Ericsson Inc.

APPLICANT:Exhibit 9 FCC ID NO: ERICSSON INCAXATR-421-A2 ©2001 Ericsson Inc. APPLICANT:Exhibit 9 FCC ID NO: ERICSSON INCAXATR-421-A2 ©2001 Ericsson Inc. APPLICANT:Exhibit 9 FCC ID NO: ERICSSON INCAXATR-421-A2 ©2001 Ericsson Inc.

REPORT 1 (25) Prepared (also subject responsible if other)No. SEM/CV/PF/P William Stewart EUS/CV/R-01:1059/REP ApprovedChecked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark DouglasMGD2001-11-12B U:\FCC Submittals\Fcc_421 Dolly Margaretta\XHIBIT11\GetDoc.doc EN SAR Test Report: R300ds (AXATR-421-A2) Date of test: October 22-23,25, 2001 Laboratory: SAR Testing Laboratory Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, Inc. 7001 Development Drive, P.O. Box 13969, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA Tested by: William Stewart Development Engineer, Antenna Development Group Test Responsible: Mark Douglas, Ph.D. Senior Technical Leader, Antenna Development Group Accreditation: This laboratory is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025-1999 to perform the following electromagnetic tests: Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), dielectric parameters, and RF power measurement on the following types of products: Wireless communications devices. A2LA certificate Number: 1650-01 Statement of Compliance: Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, Inc. declares under its sole responsibility that the product R300ds FCC ID: AXATR-421-A2 to which this declaration relates, is in conformity with the appropriate RF exposure standards, recommendations and guidelines. It also declares that the product was tested using specifications that closely conform to the latest appropriate measurement standards, guidelines and recommended practices. Any deviations from these specifications or from ISO/IEC 17025-1999 are noted below: Uncalibrated thermometers were used for liquid temperature measurement. The thermometers were verified against calibrated thermometers in air and are therefore believed to be accurate. © Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, Inc. 2001 This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The results and statements contained herein relate only to the items tested. The names of individuals involved may be mentioned only in connection with the statements or results from this report. All feedback on this report is encouraged, both positive and negative. REPORT 2 (25) Prepared (also subject responsible if other)No. SEM/CV/PF/P William Stewart EUS/CV/R-01:1059/REP ApprovedChecked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark DouglasMGD2001-11-12B U:\FCC Submittals\Fcc_421 Dolly Margaretta\XHIBIT11\GetDoc.doc EN Table of Contents 1. Introduction3 2. Device Under Test3 2.1 Antenna description3 2.2 Device description3 3. Test equipment3 3.1 Dosimetric system3 3.2 Additional calibrated equipment4 4. Electrical parameters of the tissue simulating liquid4 5. System accuracy verification5 6. Test results5 6.1Results for head5 6.2Results against the body6 References7 Appendix 1: SAR distribution comparison for system accuracy verification8 Appendix 2: SAR distribution plots13 Appendix 3: Photographs of Device Under Test16 Appendix 4: Position of Device on Phantom20 Appendix 5: Probe calibration parameters23 REPORT 3 (25) Prepared (also subject responsible if other)No. SEM/CV/PF/P William Stewart EUS/CV/R-01:1059/REP ApprovedChecked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark DouglasMGD2001-11-12B U:\FCC Submittals\Fcc_421 Dolly Margaretta\XHIBIT11\GetDoc.doc EN 1. Introduction In this report, compliance of the R300ds wireless handset with RF safety guidelines is demonstrated. The applicable RF safety guidelines and the SAR measurement specifications used for the test are described in [1]. 2. Device Under Test 2.1 Antenna description Type Internal antenna Location Inside the back cover, near the top Maximum length34.5 mm Dimensions Maximum width41 mm Configuration Patch antenna 2.2 Device description Device model R300ds FCC ID AXATR-421-A2 Serial number UA2020LBTP Mode 800 AMPS800 TDMA Multiple Access Scheme FDMATDMA Maximum Output Power Setting 1 26.0 dBm26.0 dBm Factory Tolerance in Power Setting ± 0.25± 0.25 Maximum Peak Output Power 2 26.25 dBm26.25 dBm Duty Cycle 13 Transmitting Frequency Range 824 – 849 MHz824-849 MHz Prototype or Production Unit Prototype Device Category 3 Portable RF exposure environment [2] General population / uncontrolled 3. Test equipment 3.1 Dosimetric system SAR measurements were made using a DASY3 professional system (software version 3.1c) with a SAM twin phantom, manufactured by Schmid & Partner Engineering AG (SPEAG). The extended SAR assessment uncertainty (K = 2) is ±24% [1]. The list of calibrated equipment is given below. DescriptionSerial NumberDue Date DASY3 DAE V1 43105/2002 E-field probe ET3DV6153901/2002 Dipole Validation Kit, D835V242812/2002 Dipole Validation Kit, D900V204901/2003 1 This is the peak conducted power measured at the antenna port when the device is set to its highest power setting. It is measured at the middle of the transmit frequency band. Note that the output power may be different at other frequencies. 2 This equals the maximum output power setting plus the factory tolerance. 3 The device is categorized as either mobile or portable according to United States Code of Federal Regulations 47 CFR §§ 2.1091 and 2.1093. REPORT 4 (25) Prepared (also subject responsible if other)No. SEM/CV/PF/P William Stewart EUS/CV/R-01:1059/REP ApprovedChecked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark DouglasMGD2001-11-12B U:\FCC Submittals\Fcc_421 Dolly Margaretta\XHIBIT11\GetDoc.doc EN 3.2 Additional calibrated equipment DescriptionSerial NumberDue Date Signal Generator HP8648C 3537A015989/2002 Dielectric probe kit HP 85070B US330203903/2002 Network analyzer HP 8752C 3410A031057/2002 Power meter HP 437B3125U1202610/2001 Power sensor HP 8482H3318A070972/2002 Power meter HP 437B3125U1134816/2002 Power sensor HP 8482HMY410902406/2002 Power meter HP 437B3125U137291/2002 Power sensor HP 8482HMY410902396/2002 Hygrometer/Thermometer2124291110/2002 Thermometer FS15043A8813N/A Thermometer FS15043A94-29884N/A Spectrum Analyzer MS2623AM0741810/2002 4. Electrical parameters of the tissue simulating liquid Prior to conducting SAR measurements, the relative permittivity, ε r , and the conductivity, σ, of the tissue simulating liquids were measured with the dielectric probe…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

REPORT 1 (4) Prepared (also subject responsible if other) No. SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas EUS/CV-01:1752/REP Approved Checked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas MGD 2001-12-17 B F:\REPORTS\E Section\Ericsson\2001303_R300ds\ATCB\12-12- 01\R300ds addendum.doc EN Addendum to “SAR Test Report: R300ds (AXATR-421-A2)” 1. Introduction This report is an addendum to document EUS/CV/R-01:1059/REP (Rev B), “SAR Test Report: R300ds (AXATR- 421-A2)”. In this report, additional information supporting the compliance of the R300ds wireless handset is provided. This information is in response to queries by American TCB. 2. Responses There are three questions posed by American TCB which require detailed explanation. These are numbered the same as the original questions and answered below. The other questions were answered in a simpler way (e.g. over the phone). 4) A boundary interpolation plot is required. From a phone conversation, it was made clear that this is referring to extrapolation data along the measurement axis normal to the phantom inner surface. An example plot is given below for the configuration which gives the highest SAR. © Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, Inc. 2001 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The results and statements contained herein relate only to the items tested. The names of individuals involved may be mentioned only in connection with the statements or results from this report. All feedback on this report is encouraged, both positive and negative. REPORT 2 (4) Prepared (also subject responsible if other) No. SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas EUS/CV-01:1752/REP Approved Checked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas MGD 2001-12-17 B F:\REPORTS\E Section\Ericsson\2001303_R300ds\ATCB\12-12- 01\R300ds addendum.doc EN Extrapolation of SAR to the inner surface of the phantom. 9) Please identify distance of phone to phantom (excluding belt clip) for body worn operations. For body worn operations, the device is placed flat against a flat phantom with a 2mm thick shell. The thickness of the carry accessory is 23mm (including both the clip and the leather case). Therefore, at the clip the distance from the handset to the liquid is 25mm. This distance is maintained across the length of the handset, as illustrated below. REPORT 3 (4) Prepared (also subject responsible if other) No. SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas EUS/CV-01:1752/REP Approved Checked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas MGD 2001-12-17 B F:\REPORTS\E Section\Ericsson\2001303_R300ds\ATCB\12-12- 01\R300ds addendum.doc EN 11) Please provide information on probe response to TDMA signals. The probe manufacturer (SPEAG) recently provided data on the measurement uncertainty due to the use of pulsed signals. There are two uncertainty items: • Signal response time uncertainty: the uncertainty due to the finite rise time of the probe to an electric field step response. This is assessed according to Annex E1.7 in the latest draft IEEE P1528. SPEAG states that the signal response time uncertainty is +/-0.8% with a rectangular distribution. • Probe integration time uncertainty: the uncertainty in the assessment of the time-average SAR value due to the finite measurement time at each point. This is assessed according to Annex E1.8 in the latest draft IEEE P1528. SPEAG states that the probe integration time uncertainty is +/-1.4% with a rectangular distribution. 13) Does the phantom conform to current recommendations of SCC-34/SC-2 and as described in IEEE P1528. The phantom is designed to meet these specifications. This is stated in section 5.2 of the “SAR Measurement Specification of Wireless Handsets.” Also, below is a certificate of conformance from the manufacturer (SPEAG). 23 mm REPORT 4 (4) Prepared (also subject responsible if other) No. SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas EUS/CV-01:1752/REP Approved Checked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas MGD 2001-12-17 B F:\REPORTS\E Section\Ericsson\2001303_R300ds\ATCB\12-12- 01\R300ds addendum.doc EN

REPORT 1 (14) Prepared (also subject responsible if other)No. SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas EUS/CV/R-01:1061/REP ApprovedChecked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark DouglasMGD2001-11-5A U:\FCC Submittals\Fcc_421 Dolly Margaretta\XHIBIT11\Source\SAR measurement specification.doc EN SAR Measurement Specification of Wireless Handsets Contents 1Introduction....................................................................................................................................................2 2References......................................................................................................................................................2 3Physical quantities, units and constants...........................................................................................................3 4Definitions.....................................................................................................................................................4 5Measurement system.......................................................................................................................................4 5.1General.....................................................................................................................................................4 5.2Phantom....................................................................................................................................................4 5.3SAR measurement equipment....................................................................................................................5 5.4Scanning system........................................................................................................................................5 5.5Wireless device holder...............................................................................................................................5 5.6Other equipment........................................................................................................................................5 6Protocol for SAR assessment..........................................................................................................................6 6.1Measurement preparation...........................................................................................................................6 6.2Tests to be performed................................................................................................................................6 6.3Measurement procedure.............................................................................................................................6 6.4Post processing..........................................................................................................................................6 7Measurement uncertainty................................................................................................................................6 Annex A. Tissue simulating material preparation....................................................................................................8 A.1Preparation of liquid..................................................................................................................................8 A.2Preparation procedure................................................................................................................................9 A.3Tissue liquid maintenance........................................................................................................................10 Annex B. Dielectric property measurements.........................................................................................................10 B.1Equipment...............................................................................................................................................10 B.2Procedure for testing brain simulating liquid............................................................................................10 B.3Dielectric parameters...............................................................................................................................11 Annex CSAR measurement protocol...............................................................................................................11 C.1Peak spatial-average SAR assessment......................................................................................................11 C.2SAR measurement procedure...................................................................................................................12 C.2.1Initial setup...................................................................................................................................12 C.2.2Measurement procedure.................................................................................................................13 C.2.3Post measurement procedure..........................................................................................................13 Annex D. Measurement system validation............................................................................................................13 REPORT 2 (14) Prepared (also subject responsible if other)No. SEM/CV/PF/P Mark Douglas EUS/CV/R-01:1061/REP ApprovedChecked SEM/CV/PF/P Mark DouglasMGD2001-11-5A U:\FCC Submittals\Fcc_421 Dolly Margaretta\XHIBIT11\Source\SAR measurement specification.doc EN 1. Introduction and Scope It is our policy that all RF tra…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.