NBI-MTAG216A1Tracking Unit

“TracPac” Tracking System’s Guide System No. XXX Electronic Tracking Systems This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of Electronic Tracking Systems (ETS) and is considered ETS Proprietary Information. This information is not to be released to the press or other media, and is not public information. This information is supplied for the use of certain public officials and commercial operations within the guidelines of an agreement with those individuals or the entities they represent on the express conditions that they respect and treat said information as ETS Proprietary Information under the guidelines of current existing U.S. law. NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT Client agrees to limit disclosure of the nature and operation of the ETS TracPacs and tracking units only to those trusted employees with a “need-to-know”. Further, Client will caution all employees or others cognizant of the nature and contents of this agreement, of the nature and operation of the TracPac or tracking units, and not to disseminate this information. ETS – Proprietary Information 1 Table of Contents Who to Contact..........................................................................................................................................3 Employee Non-Disclosure & Training Statement....................................................................................4 ETS – Proprietary Information 2 Notice: This device complies with part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. CAUTION! Changes or modifications not expressly approved by Spectrum Management, LLC could void the user's authority to operate this equipment. “This transmitter is authorized by rule under the Low Power Radio Service (47 C.F.R. Part 95) and must not cause harmful interference to TV reception or United States Navy SPASUR installations. You do not need an FCC license to operate this transmitter. This transmitter may only be used to provide: auditory assistance to persons with disabilities, persons who require language translation, or persons in educational settings; health care services to the ill; law enforcement tracking services under agreement with a law enforcement agency; or automated maritime telecommunications system (AMTS) network control communications. Two-way voice communications and all other types of uses not mentioned above are expressly prohibited.” “This device may not interfere with TV reception or federal government radar, and must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.” ETS – Proprietary Information 3 Who to Contact Your ETS Representatives: Local ETS Contact Name, Contact’s Title Regional Operation Manager’s Name – Title Office Phone Number -- Office Fax Number -- Fax Your Police Department Contacts: (Name of) Police Department Name of Contact Person Contact Person’s Title Street Address City, State Zip Code ETS Corporate Office: Kathryn Apolito, Vice President, Support Services (ext. 4024) Tammy Stone, Support Services Administrative Assistant (ext. 2014) Christy Potter, Support Services Administrative Assistant (ext. 4043) Electronic Tracking Systems 2545 Tarpley Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone: 888-387-1445 Fax: 877-901-1387 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ETS – Proprietary Information 4 Employee Non-Disclosure Statement & Training Update Statement The following is required of each employee to whom ETS data is discussed. I understand by signing this document that I have agreed not to disclose the nature and operation of the Electronic Tracking System to ANYONE who does not have a “need-to-know”. I also agree to caution fellow employees who know the nature and operation of the ETS system not to disseminate the information. In addition, I have received adequate training in the implementation of the TracPac Program. Name (Print) Signature Training Date

and Parts List

Exhibit K – Letter of Authorization Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter

2545 Tarpley Road ♦ Carrollton, TX 75006 ♦ (469) 574-2000 ♦ FAX (469) 574-2001 18 December, 2002 American Telecommunications Certification Body, Inc. 6731 Whittier Avenue McLean, VA 22101 RE: Certification Application FCC ID: NBI-MTAG216A Spectrum Management, LLC is the parent company of Spectrum Tracking Systems, Inc. and Electronic Tracking Systems, LLC. The Grantee Code "NBI" was originally granted to Electronic Tracking Systems and was transferred to Spectrum Tracking Systems, LLC when Spectrum Management, LLC purchased that business. The Certification Application should be under Spectrum Tracking Systems, LLC Grantee Code "NBI" and Electronic Tracking Systems, LLC "FRN 0005-0240-47". There was a misunderstanding on our part about the Grantee Code still being assigned to Electronic Tracking Systems, LLC. We apologize for the confusion. Should additional information be required please contact: Jerry W. Culpepper Vice President, Engineering Services Spectrum Management, LLC 2545 Tarpley Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Ph: 469-574-2000 Fax: 469-574-2001 Sincerely, Jerry W. Culpepper Vice President, Engineering Services

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 December 16, 2002 RE: Electronic Tracking Systems, L.L.C. FCC ID: NBI-MTAG216A1 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The grantee code NBI is listed as Spectrum Tracking Systems, Inc. of Dallas TX, but the 731 submitted shows Electronic Tracking Systems of Carrollton TX. Please explain. 2) Two files provided under the correspondence exhibits (Exhibits J, LOCPDF and Exhibits K, LOAPDF) are empty files. It is assumed that this is the agency agreement and confidentiality Letter. Please provide new uploads for these exhibits. 3) The FCC Label should be proceeded by "FCC ID:" not "FCCID". Please correct the labeling information. 4) Please provide the following exhibits: a) Operational description b) Tune up procedure over power range c) Description of all circuitry and devices provided for determining and stabilizing frequency, for suppression of spurious radiation, for limiting modulation, and for limiting power. d) detailed description of the modulation system to be used 5) Please provide emissions designator information (2.201/2.202). 6) The test report seems to present test data following typical radiated methods such as ANSI C63.4. Please note that when the limits are given as ERP and in dBc (40 + 10 log P) then the device should be tested following substitution methods specified in EIA/TIA 603. Please reference email interpretation from Frank Coperich that defined this policy. 7) The temperature stability presented in the test report does not appear to allow the device a sufficient time time to stabilize all of the components at the measured temperature prior to making the measurement as required by 2.1057(b) and as stated on page 6 of the test report. Soak times of 1-2 hours are usually considered typical. Please note that the device should be powered off between each test cycle as well. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 January 8, 2003 RE: Electronic Tracking Systems, L.L.C. FCC ID: NBI-MTAG216A1 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) Two files provided under the correspondence exhibits (Exhibits J, LOCPDF and Exhibits K, LOAPDF) are empty files. It is assumed that this is the agency agreement and confidentiality Letter. Please provide new uploads for these exhibits. 2) Please provide the following exhibits: a) Tune up procedure over power range. Internal photographs seem to show variable inductors/capacitors, etc. Therefore the manufacturer should explain how all adjustable components are set during the manufacture process to ensure that the device has the proper frequency, output power, etc to meet FCC regulations. 3) There is no emission designator description provided with this application as required by CFR 2.1033(c)(4). Please see 2.202 for examples and instructions. Please provide sample calculations for the necessary bandwidth provided for the emissions designator of 180HA1D. 4) Previous emissions designators for Electronics Tracking Systems show AXN, while the one provided for this application is A1D. Please justify the emissions designator code to use. 5) The test report seems to present test data following typical radiated methods such as ANSI C63.4. Please note that when the limits are given as ERP and in dBc (40 + 10 log P) then the device should be tested following substitution methods specified in EIA/TIA 603. Please reference email interpretation from Frank Coperich that defined this policy. 6) The temperature stability presented in the test report does not appear to allow the device a sufficient time time to stabilize all of the components at the measured temperature prior to making the measurement as required by 2.1057(b) and as stated on page 6 of the test report. Soak times of 1-2 hours are usually considered typical. Please note that the device should be powered off between each test cycle as well. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Question 4 b) The frequency is fixed, no adjustments. 4c) the Modulation code is 180HA1D. I will be sending the pdf's on the AATCB website. -----Original Message----- From: Timothy R. Johnson [mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:55 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Review of Electronic Tracking Systems, L.L.C., FCC ID: NBI-MTAG216A1 Jeffrey/Nicole, Thank you for the recent email addressing some of the issues we asked about. Attached is an updated list of comments regarding review of this application. Please provide information as soon as possible. Thank You, Timothy R. Johnson NARTE Certified EMC Engineer No. EMC-002205-NE email: [email protected] alternate email: [email protected] To: "Timothy R. Johnson" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Review of Electronic Tracking Systems, L.L.C., FCC ID: NBI-MTAG216A1 1/8/2003file://C:\DOCUME~1\TIMOTH~1.JOH\LOCALS~1\Temp\eud9D.htm

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 January 14, 2003 RE: Electronic Tracking Systems, L.L.C. FCC ID: NBI-MTAG216A1 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) Please provide sample calculations (that show all variables and values used, i.e. 2M + 2DK) for the necessary bandwidth provided for the emissions designator of 180HA1D. 2) Previous emissions designators for Electronics Tracking Systems show AXN, while the one provided for this application is A1D. Please justify the emissions designator code to use. 3) The test report seems to present test data following typical radiated methods such as ANSI C63.4. Please note that when the limits are given as ERP and in dBc (40 + 10 log P) then the device should be tested following substitution methods specified in EIA/TIA 603. Please reference email interpretation from Frank Coperich that defined this policy. 4) The temperature stability presented in the test report does not appear to allow the device a sufficient time time to stabilize all of the components at the measured temperature prior to making the measurement as required by 2.1057(b) and as stated on page 6 of the test report. Soak times of 1-2 hours are usually considered typical. Please note that the device should be powered off between each test cycle as well. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Exhibit E – EUT Photographs Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Top View External – Bottom View Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter External – Battery removed Main Board – Top View Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Main View – Bottom View

Label Location

Exhibit E – EUT Photographs Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Top View External – Bottom View Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter External – Battery removed Main Board – Top View Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Main View – Bottom View

Exhibit B – Measurement Report Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter FCC ID NBI-MTAG216A1 Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Page 1 Project Number: 03083-10 Prepared for: ELECTRONIC TRACKING SYSTEMS 2545 Tarpley Road. Carrollton, TX 75006 By Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. 1601 FM 1460, Suite B Round Rock, Texas 78664 November 2002 CERTIFICATION Electromagnetic Interference Test Report ELECTRONIC TRACKING SYSTEMS LPRS Transmitter (Intentional Radiator Portion) FCC ID NBI-MTAG216A1 Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Page 2 Table of Contents Title Page....................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents........................................................................................................................2 Certificate of Compliance............................................................................................................3 1.0 EUT Description.............................................................................................................4 1.1 EUT Operation................................................................................................................4 2.0 Electromagnetic Emissions Testing..................................................................................4 2.1 Test Procedure............................................................................................................5 2.2 Test Criteria.................................................................................................................5 2.3 Test Results.................................................................................................................6 3.0 Occupied Bandwidth Measurements................................................................................6 3.1 Test Procedure............................................................................................................6 3.2 Test Criteria.................................................................................................................6 3.3 Test Results.................................................................................................................6 4.0 Frequency Stability............................................................................................................6 4.1 Test Procedure...........................................................................................................6 4.2 Test Criteria.................................................................................................................7 4.3 Test Results.................................................................................................................7 5.0 RF Power Output.............................................................................................................7 5.1 Test Procedure............................................................................................................7 5.2 Test Criteria................................................................................................................7 5.3 Test Results.................................................................................................................7 6.0 Modulation Characteristics..................................................................................................7 6.1 Test Procedure............................................................................................................8 6.2 Test Results.................................................................................................................8 7.0 Modifications to Equipment.............................................................................................8 8.0 List of Test Equipment....................................................................................................8 Figures Figure 1: Radiated Emission Test Setup....................................................................................9 Appendices Appendix A Radiated Emission Data Sheets..........................................................................10 Appendix B Spurious Radiated Emissions Data Sheets..........................................................12 Appendix C Harmonic Radiated Emissions Data Sheets.........................................................15 Appendix D Occupied Bandwidth Data Sheets.......................................................................22 Appendix E Frequency Stability.............................................................................................26 THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL TESTING (EMI), INC. FCC ID NBI-MTAG216A1 Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Page 3 Applicant: Electronic Tracking Systems Applicant’s Address: 2545 Tarpley Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Model: LPRS Transmitter Serial Number: None Project Number: 03083-10 I, Jeffrey A. Lenk, for Professional Testing (EMI), Inc., being familiar with the FCC rules and test procedures have reviewed the test setup, measured data and this report. I believe them to be true and accurate. The Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter was tested to and found to be in compliance with FCC Part 2 and 95 for an Intentional Radiator. The highest emissions generated by the above equipment are listed below: Frequency (MHz) Level (dBμV/m) Limit (dBμV/m) Margin (dB) Fundamental 216.48 99.8 N/A N/A Spurious 793.78 47.9 69.2 -21.3 Frequency (MHz) Measured Power Power Requirement RF Power Output 216.48 57.63 mW 100 mW Frequency (MHz) Measured Bandwidth Bandwidth Requirement Occupied Bandwidth 216.48 5.09 kHz 25.0 kHz AM Percent Modulation 52.7 _____________________________ Jeffrey A. Lenk President Certificate of Compliance FCC ID NBI-MTAG216A1 Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Page 4 1.0 EUT Description The Equipment Under Test (EUT) is the Electronic Tracking Systems …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Channel Center Frequency 216.4875 MHz Error Limit 50 PPM Degree Celsius 9 Volts Time On Time On +:00 Error PPM Time On + :02 Error PPM Time On + :05 Error PPM Time On + :10 Error PPM -30 11:00 -9.5 -10.8 -10.9 -11.3 -20 12:00 -6.1 -5.5 -4.9 -5.2 -10 13:04 -0.6 +0.2 -1.2 -1.4 0 14:00 +0.09 +0.28 +0.3 +0.3 10 15:00 +0.83 +0.86 +0.86 +0.86 20 @ 9 Volts 16:00 +0.67 +0.42 +0.39 +0.42 20 @ 7 Volts 16:12 +0.46 20 @ 9.5 Volts 16:14 +0.43 30 17:00 -0.25 -0.28 -0.28 -0.29 40 18:00 -0.53 -0.54 -0.56 -0.61 50 19:00 -0.53 -0.30 -0.26 -0.25

Unwanted Emissions 95.635cMeasured using Substitution Method Requirement 43 + 10 log (watts) dBis equil to 30.6 dB below carrier Watts = .05763Carrier = 17.6 dBm Requirement = 17.6 - 30.6 = -13 dBm Corrected ERP is Power Meter measurement at source end, minus cable loss, plus antenna gain (dBd). FrequencyPwr MeterCable LossAnt GainCorrectedLimitMargin Orientation MHzdBmdBdBdERP (dBm)(dBm)(dB) 144.325-38.23.7-1.9-43.8-13.0-30.8Flat H 288.65-36.85.52.3-40.0-13.0-27.0Flat H 360.812-51.36.23.2-54.3-13.0-41.3Flat H 432.975-33.174-36.1-13.0-23.1Flat H 505.137-417.64.4-44.2-13.0-31.2Flat H 577.3-45.38.25.1-48.4-13.0-35.4Edge H 649.48-31.98.85.2-35.5-13.0-22.5Edge H 721.625-52.19.55-56.6-13.0-43.6Edge H 793.765-41.2104.5-46.7-13.0-33.7Edge H 865.92-47.21.64.8-44.0-13.0-31.0Edge H 1082.437-44.41.94.8-41.5-13.0-28.5End V 1298.92-3825.4-34.6-13.0-21.6Flat H 1515.4-40.52.26.4-36.3-13.0-23.3End V 1731.9-35.92.36.7-31.5-13.0-18.5Flat H 1948.38-50.22.56.8-45.9-13.0-32.9Flat H 2164.87-42.82.67.2-38.2-13.0-25.2End V Power Measurement at source end of cable. dBd = dBi - 2.15 dB dBi = 20*LOG(MHz)-29.78-AntFactor Test Equipment List HP8566B Stack Gigatronics 9000 HP436A Pwr Meter HP8442 Power Senser Horn A/N 077 Bi-cone A/N 007 LP A/N 0461 C007 Armored Cable C009 100 fT RG214 Cable

The limit for unwanted emission was recalculated relative to the EUT output as follows: 10 X Log (.05763 watts) = - 12.4 dB watts The requirement is 43 + 10 X Log (watts) Substituting –12.4 in above equation is 43 + (- 12.4) = 30.6 dB below carrier Carrier level is 10 X Log (57.63 mw) = +17.6 dBm Limit is then +17.6 (Carrier) – 30.6 (requirement) = -13 dBm Measurement Setup and Procedure: The EUT was placed on the OATS table (or 1 meter setup above 865 MHz) and normal Radiated Emissions measurements were made and recorded in dBuV for the worst case polarity and EUT orthogonal orientation and azimuth. Above 865 MHz a 10 meter Armored microwave cable was used. An appropriate antenna for the frequency was substituted for the EUT in a matching polarization. A signal generator in CW mode was connected to a HP11667A power divider. The power divider was connected to the 100 foot RG-214 cable, or the 10 meter Armored cable, going to the antenna on one side and to a HP8482A power sensor connected to a HP436A power meter on the other side. The signal generator was set to the frequency in question and the output adjusted as required to match the previously measured signal from the EUT. The receiving antenna was height scanned for a peak amplitude. In some cases it was necessary to add additional HP 9491B attenuators to the power divider output going to the antenna. When these attenuators were added the level as read on the power meter was adjusted down by the same amount as the additional attenuation added. The power meter reading, or adjusted reading was recorded. The cable loss was subtracted from the power meter reading, or adjusted reading., to get the power at the substitution antenna. The Substitution Antenna Gain relative to a dipole was then added to the above calculated power to arrive at the Effective Radiated Power of the EUT. The Limit was subtracted from the Effective radiated power to arrive at a margin. The substitution procedure was repeated with an appropriate antenna for all the frequencies recorded in the first step.

Exhibit D – Test Setup Photographs Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Radiated Emissions – Front Flat View Radiated Emissions – Back View Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Radiated Emissions – On Edge View Radiated Emissions – On End View Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Microwave Radiated Emissions – Front Flat View Microwave Radiated Emissions – Rear Flat View Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Temperature Dependant Frequency Stability Temperature Dependant Frequency Stability Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter Voltage Dependant Frequency Stability Modulation Test Setup Electronic Tracking Systems LPRS Transmitter RF Power Output & Occupied Bandwidth Test Setup