P6FPROXRFReal Time Asset Tracking and Event Association

Letter of Attestation regarding units tested at PTI Jupiter A760-0001 Jupiter II A760-0002 Jupiter III A760-0003 Venus R142-i3BN *433.92MHz only Saturn R142-i3RF For the 433.92MHz transmitter the duty Cycle is as follows: 40 pulses are output of 27uS duration over an 88mS time period to form our pulse train. The transmit duty cycle is .12% PTI has a capture of the 433 data. Duty cycle = 40*.000027/.088 = .00123 15.231(a)(3) Statement: For the purpose of determining system integrity, specifically for security and safety applications, the 433Mhz transmitter emits supervisory and polling transmissions, including data. However, the total duration of these transmissions are limited such that they do not exceed more than 2 seconds per hour. 15.231(a) (2) Statement: A transmitter activated automatically shall cease transmission within 5 seconds after activation. For the 915MHz transmitter: For 915 MHz transmit, all units with a 915MHz transmitter are limited to a transmit duty cycle of 79% for a given 100mS pulse train. Duty Cycle = transmit time / total time = 670uS/850uS = .788 Detail View: Wide View: Ronald Graczyk certifies this data to be true and correct: X______________________________________________________ 10/11/11 Ron Graczyk Director of Engineering, RFCode, Inc. www.rfcode.com

GRFCOdC By: f f- ' Date parvey Title: Product Manager On behalf of RF Code, lnc. Tele$rone: 512.439.2240 9229 WaterM CenFe BM. r Suite 500 o Austin, TX 78758 [email protected] Teh 512.439.2200 urunr.rfcode.com Fax 512.439.2199 AutrodtvbActas Aqent Date: August 29,2011 American Certification Body, lnc. 6731 WhittierAvenue Suite C110 Mclean, VA 22101 To Whom lt May Concem: ProfessionalTesting (EMl), lnc. 1601 North A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B, Round Rock, TX 78665 is authodzed to act on our behalf, until otheruise notified, for applications to American Certiftcation Body, lnc. (ACB). We certify that we are not subject to denial of federal benefits, that includes FCC benefits, ptrsuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. 862. Further, ro party, as defined in 47 CFR 1.20A2 (b), to the application is subject to denial of federal benefits, hat includes FCC benefits. Thank you, AgencyAgreementExpirationDate: August29,2012

GRFCOdC 9229 Waterford Centre Blvd. r Suite 500 o Austin, TX 78758 [email protected] Tel: 512.439.2200 www.rfcode.mm Fax 512.439.2199 ReEuest for ConfidentialiU Date: Augusl29,2011 Subject ConfidentialityRequestfor FCCID PGFPRXRFC Purcuant to FCC 47 CRF 0.457(d) and 0.459 and lC RSP-100, Seetion 10, the applicant requests that a part of the subiect FCC application h held confidential. Type of Gonfidentiality Requested Exhibit flStrortterm [lPermanent Block Diagrams f] Strort term ffi Permanent Operation Descriptionffheory of Operation fl Short Term X Permanent Parts List & PlacemenUBOM fJsnortterm I Permanent Schematics RF Code, lnc. has spent substantial effort in developing this product and it is one of the first of its kind in industry. Having the subject information easily available to 'competition" would negate the advantage we have achieved by developing this product. Not protecting the details of the design will resuft in financialhadship. Pennanent Confi dentiality: The applicant requests the exhibits listed above as pemanently confidential be permanently withheld from public review due to materials that contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. Sincerely, By: P-< P-*-, ' Dale Parvey Product Manager

A760-0002 External Bottom A760-0002 External Top

0190 Sho w num Do n mod chan temp So m may RFCo 9229 Aust i 07, UNIT, TA wn is an ima mber & bar co not move the del number p nged based o plate file. me printers re also need ad ode, Inc. Waterford Ce n in, TX 78758 AG, JUPITE age of the lab ode sequenci e location of arameters “A on the Custom equire adjust djusting. Log nter Blvd. #500 ER II, COMB bel created in ing program fthe data fiel A760-0000-0 mer data for ments to the go shown fo 0 B R n LabelView m. lds. The dat 000-04T” w the order. D e top and left or illustration REV01 w (8.0) for ill ta fields: Gro will not chang Data to be pro t margins wh n only- may 11/07/11 lustration pu oup Code (“I ge. Serial ID ovided with hen printing vary. See B RFCo urposes. Lab IRFPRX”); D field (“000 part order o due to inter OM for addi ode, Inc. belView is a Beacon “10B 00001”) mu or as a modif rnal offsets. itional notes a serial B” rate and ust be fied label Darkness s. NOTES:1) CENTER LABEL HORIZONTALLY2) PLACE VERTICALLY APPROXIMATELY AS SHOWN3) SOME LABEL DATA MAY VARY, SHOWN FOR REFERNCE 01900 UR rgraczyk UNIT, JUPITERII, LABEL PLACEMENT Default .XX+/-.01+/- 1/16 .XXX+/-.005 +/- 1/2 WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RF CODE IS PR OHIBITED. D C B A ABC D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 01900_DUR_LABEL.SLDDRW DRAWN SIZE COPYRIGHT © 2011, RF CODE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWING FILE NAME DATE 8/26/2011 DATE 8/26/2011 TITLE MATERIAL & FINISH - SEE NOTES CHECKED RF CODE CONFIDENTIAL - STRICTLY PRIVATE SCALE 1:1 SHEET 1 OF 1 3D MODEL CONFIGURATION NAME 01900 .X+/-.03 PRODUCT 3D MODEL FILE NAME 512-439-2200 512-439-2199 FAX . THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION FRACTIONS DECIMALS ANGLES DO NOT SCALE DRAWING ENGINEER REV. B DWG. NO. DATE 8/26/2011 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEDDIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES.TOLERANCES ARE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF RF CODE. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE 9229 Waterford Center Blvd. #500 Austin, TX 78758 REV. SUFFIX DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED REVISIONS

A760-0002 Internal Bottom A760-0002 Internal Bottom

Project 12687-10 Prepared for: RF Code, Inc. 9229 Waterford Centre Boulevard Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 By Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. 1601 N. A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B Round Rock, Texas 78665 October 27, 2011 MPE / RF Exposure Report Jupiter Series FCC ID: P6FPROXRF 12687-10 Page 2 of 5 Table of Contents Title Page ........................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................2 Certificate of Compliance..............................................................................................................4 1.0 MPE Prediction ...................................................................................................................4 1.1 Evaluation Procedure .......................................................................................................4 1.2 Evaluation Criteria ...........................................................................................................4 NOTICE: (1) This Report must not be used to claim product endorsement, by NVLAP, NIST, the FCC or any other Agency. This report also does not warrant certification by NVLAP or NIST. (2) This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. (3) The significance of this report is dependent on the representative character of the test sample submitted for evaluation and the results apply only in reference to the sample tested. The manufacturer must continuously implement the changes shown herein to attain and maintain the required degree of compliance. 12687-10 Page 3 of 5 Applicant: RF Code, Inc. Applicant’s Address: 9229Waterford Centre Boulevard Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 FCC ID: P6FPROXRF Project Number: 12687-10 Test Dates: August 29 th – September 2 nd , 2011 I, Layne Lueckemeyer, for Professional Testing (EMI), Inc., being familiar with the FCC rules and test procedures have reviewed the test setup, measured data and this report. I believe them to be true and accurate. Layne Lueckemeyer Product Development Engineer This report has been reviewed and accepted by RF Code, Inc. The undersigned is responsible for ensuring that this device will continue to comply with the FCC rules. _____________________________________ RF Code, Inc., Representative 12687-10 Page 4 of 5 1.0 MPE Prediction Prediction of MPE limit at a given distance was made by using equation from page 18 of OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01. In order to prove that SAR is not required we used the combined MPE calculation of the 433.92 MHz transmitter and the 915 MHz transmitter combined. The data is contained in the worksheet below. 1.1 Evaluation Procedure S=PG/4 R² Where: S = power density P= power input to antenna G = power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna 1.2 Evaluation Criteria MPE limit for uncontrolled exposure at prediction frequency (mW/cm²): 1.0 12687-10 Page 5 of 5 MPE Prediction Calculation PROJECT # DATE RULE DISTANCE ANTENNA RBW VBW DETECTOR 12687-10 October 27, 2011 15.231 / 15.247 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Calculations S=PG/4 R² Where: S = power density P= power input to antenna G = power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna MPE 433 MHz Transmitter Frequency (MHz) Peak Output Power (dBm) Peak Output Power (mW) Prediction Distance (cm) Max Antenna Gain (dBi) Max Antenna Gain (numeric) Power Density at 20.0 cm (mW/cm²) 433.92 -14.92 0.0322 20 2.0 1.585 .00000102 MPE 915 MHz Transmitter Frequency (MHz) Peak Output Power (dBm) Peak Output Power (mW) Prediction Distance (cm) Max Antenna Gain (dBi) Max Antenna Gain (numeric) Power Density at 20.0 cm (mW/cm²) 915 14.17 26.12 20 2.0 1.585 .00824048 NOTE: Antenna Gain is estimated worst case scenario. .00000102 + .00824048 = .0082415 mW/cm² .0082415 mW/cm² < 1.0 mW/cm² Result = Pass

1601 North A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B Round Rock, TX 78665 e-mail: [email protected] (512) 244-3371 Fax: (512) 244-1846 October 27, 2011 Ron Graczyk RF Code, Inc. 9229Waterford Centre Boulevard Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 Dear Ron: Enclosed is the Wireless Test Report for the Jupiter Series 915 MHz Transmitter by RF Code, Inc. This report can be used to demonstrate compliance with FCC requirements for wireless devices in the United States and Canada. This report must be used in conjunction with the accompanying RF Code Letter of Attestation, Rev. D. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jeffrey A. Lenk President Enclosure RF Code, Inc. – Jupiter Series Wireless Certification Report 12687-10 October 27, 2011 Page 2 of 32 Project 12687-10 RF Code, Inc. Jupiter Series 915 MHz Transmitter Wireless Certification Report Prepared for: RF Code, Inc. 9229 Waterford Centre Boulevard, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 By Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. 1601 N. A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B Round Rock, Texas 78665 October 27, 2011 Reviewed by Written by Jeffrey A. Lenk President Layne Lueckemeyer Product Development Engineer RF Code, Inc. – Jupiter Series Wireless Certification Report 12687-10 October 27, 2011 Page 3 of 32 Table of Contents Title Page .........................................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction...........................................................................................................................5 1.1 Scope................................................................................................................................5 1.2 EUT Description ..............................................................................................................5 1.3 Modifications ...................................................................................................................6 1.4 Test Site ...........................................................................................................................6 1.5 Applicable Documents.....................................................................................................6 2.0 Output Power ........................................................................................................................8 2.1 Test Procedure .................................................................................................................8 2.2 Test Criteria .....................................................................................................................9 2.3 Test Results ......................................................................................................................9 3.0 Occupied Bandwidth...........................................................................................................14 3.1 Test Procedure ...............................................................................................................14 3.2 Test Criteria ...................................................................................................................14 3.3 Test Results ....................................................................................................................14 4.0 Power Spectral Density.......................................................................................................19 4.1 Test Procedure ...............................................................................................................19 4.2 Test Criteria ...................................................................................................................19 4.3 Test Results ....................................................................................................................19 5.0 Out of Band Spurious Emissions ........................................................................................22 5.1 Test Procedure ...............................................................................................................22 5.2 Test Criteria ...................................................................................................................22 5.3 Test Results ....................................................................................................................23 6.0 Antenna Requirements........................................................................................................31 6.1 Evaluation Procedure .....................................................................................................31 6.2 Evaluation Criteria .........................................................................................................31 6.3 Evaluation Results .........................................................................................................31 End of Report .................................................................................................................................32 THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL TESTING (EMI), INC. NOTICE: (1) This Report must not be used to claim product endorsement, by NVLAP, NIST, the FCC or any other Agency. This report also does not warrant certification by NVLAP or NIST. (2) This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. (3) The significance of this report is dependent on the representative character of the test sample submitted for evaluation and the results apply only in reference to the sample tested. The manufacturer must continuously implement the changes shown herein to attain and maintain the required degree of compliance. RF Code, Inc. – Jupiter Series Wireless Certification Report 12687-10 October 27, 2011 Page 4 of 32 Applicant: RF Code, Inc. Applicant’s Address: 9229 Waterford Centre Boulevard, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78758 FCC ID: …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

12687-10 Test Setup Photos