P6FPRXRFCA760 Proximity Locator

01908DUR A760 Proximity Locator 01908DUR Preface Trademarks RF Code TM and the RF Code logo are trademarks of RF Code, Inc. All other product names are copyright and registered trademarks or trade names of their respective owners. Copyright Statement Copyright © 2011 RF Code, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document, as well as the hardware and firmware described therein, are furnished under license and may only be used or copied in accordance with the terms of such license. The information in these pages are furnished for informational use only, are subject to change without notice, and should not be construed as a commitment by RF Code, Inc. RF Code assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in these pages. RF Code reserves the right to make changes without further notice to any products herein. RF Code makes no warranty, representation or guarantee regarding the suitability of its products for any particular purpose, nor does RF Code assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product, and specifically disclaims any and all liability, including without limitation consequential or incidental damages. The user of this system is cautioned that any changes or modifications to this system, not expressly approved by RF Code, Inc., could void the warranty. Every effort has been made to supply complete and accurate information. However, RF Code assumes no responsibility for its use, or for any infringements of patents or other rights of third parties, which would result. RF Code, Inc. 9229 Waterford Centre Blvd. Suite 500 Austin, TX 78758 www.rfcode.com FCC Compliance This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a 01908DUR commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference, in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense. RF Code is not responsible for any radio or television interference caused by using other than recommended cables and connectors or by unauthorized changes or modifications to this equipment. Unauthorized changes or modifications could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment. This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. CFR Rule – 15.21 Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment. RF Code, Inc. 9229 Waterford Centre Blvd. Suite 500 Austin, TX 78758 www.rfcode.com Industry Canada Compliance Statement This Class A digital apparatus meets the requirements of the Canadian Interference-Causing Equipment Regulations. Avis de conformité à la réglementation d’Industrie Canada Cet appareil numérique de la classe A respecte toutes les exigences du Règlement sur le matériel brouilleur du Canada. The system is designed to operate with RF Code RFID Tags – whose operating frequency is 433.92 MHz which have been certified or are in the certification process. These devices comply with part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) these devices may not cause harmful interference, and (2) these devices must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. a. FCC ID: P6F2005433 for beacon intervals greater than, or equal to 10 seconds. b. FCC ID: P6F433MHZ for the security tag with beacon intervals less than 10 seconds. 01908DUR Battery Statement RF Code warrants all tags to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of 1 year. Based on the ratings and specifications from the battery manufacturers, RF Code develops usage models to calculate the life of the active RFID Tags. Like all models there are assumptions and approximations involved. The values are to be taken as engineering estimates - not guaranteed performance. In most asset tag deployment scenarios, RF Code tags with a 10-second beacon rate have a useful life of 5-to-7 years. In most sensor tag deployment scenarios, RF Code tags will typically have a useful life of 3 or more years. Exposure to extreme temperatures for all tags will shorten the battery life. 01908DUR Overview The A760 Proximity Locator is a wall-mounted unit used in conjunction with R142 Staff Badges to provide a method of locating people and correlating events within tightly-defined coverage areas. Each Proximity Locator transmits an RF pulse pattern containing a unique code when the attached switch is actuated by a door opening or other event. The A760 also detects the nearest R142 Staff Badge at the time of the event (typical coverage is 3 meters) and transmits the ID of the badge and other tag payload information to an RF Code reader infrastructure. When used with RF Code’s Asset Manager or other 3 rd -party software, the solution enables tracking of who did what, when, and where. Features  Battery-powered wall-mounted unit (3 AA batteries – not included)  2-year battery life (50% duty cycle)  Low-battery indicator  Field-upgradable firmware  Communication status indicator LED Contents  A760 Proximity Locator  Proximity Locator Utility CD  User Manual Operating System Requirements for Proximity Locator Utility • Windows XP, Windows Vista, or Windows 7 01908DUR A760 People/Event Correlation Process The A760 Proximity Locator works in conjunction with A7…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Letter of Attestation regarding units tested at PTI Jupiter A760-0001 Jupiter II A760-0002 Jupiter III A760-0003 Venus R142-i3BN *433.92MHz only Saturn R142-i3RF For the 433.92MHz transmitter the duty Cycle is as follows: 40 pulses are output of 27uS duration over an 88mS time period to form our pulse train. The transmit duty cycle is .12% PTI has a capture of the 433 data. Duty cycle = 40*.000027/.088 = .00123 15.231(a)(3) Statement: For the purpose of determining system integrity, specifically for security and safety applications, the 433Mhz transmitter emits supervisory and polling transmissions, including data. However, the total duration of these transmissions are limited such that they do not exceed more than 2 seconds per hour. 15.231(a) (2) Statement: A transmitter activated automatically shall cease transmission within 5 seconds after activation. For the 915MHz transmitter: For 915 MHz transmit, all units with a 915MHz transmitter are limited to a transmit duty cycle of 79% for a given 100mS pulse train. Duty Cycle = transmit time / total time = 670uS/850uS = .788 Detail View: Wide View: Ronald Graczyk certifies this data to be true and correct: X______________________________________________________ 10/11/11 Ron Graczyk Director of Engineering, RFCode, Inc. www.rfcode.com

GRFCOdC By: f f- ' Date parvey Title: Product Manager On behalf of RF Code, lnc. Tele$rone: 512.439.2240 9229 WaterM CenFe BM. r Suite 500 o Austin, TX 78758 [email protected] Teh 512.439.2200 urunr.rfcode.com Fax 512.439.2199 AutrodtvbActas Aqent Date: August 29,2011 American Certification Body, lnc. 6731 WhittierAvenue Suite C110 Mclean, VA 22101 To Whom lt May Concem: ProfessionalTesting (EMl), lnc. 1601 North A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B, Round Rock, TX 78665 is authodzed to act on our behalf, until otheruise notified, for applications to American Certiftcation Body, lnc. (ACB). We certify that we are not subject to denial of federal benefits, that includes FCC benefits, ptrsuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. 862. Further, ro party, as defined in 47 CFR 1.20A2 (b), to the application is subject to denial of federal benefits, hat includes FCC benefits. Thank you, AgencyAgreementExpirationDate: August29,2012

GRFCOdC 9229 Waterford Centre Blvd. r Suite 500 o Austin, TX 78758 [email protected] Tel: 512.439.2200 www.rfcode.mm Fax 512.439.2199 ReEuest for ConfidentialiU Date: Augusl29,2011 Subject ConfidentialityRequestfor FCCID PGFPRXRFC Purcuant to FCC 47 CRF 0.457(d) and 0.459 and lC RSP-100, Seetion 10, the applicant requests that a part of the subiect FCC application h held confidential. Type of Gonfidentiality Requested Exhibit flStrortterm [lPermanent Block Diagrams f] Strort term ffi Permanent Operation Descriptionffheory of Operation fl Short Term X Permanent Parts List & PlacemenUBOM fJsnortterm I Permanent Schematics RF Code, lnc. has spent substantial effort in developing this product and it is one of the first of its kind in industry. Having the subject information easily available to 'competition" would negate the advantage we have achieved by developing this product. Not protecting the details of the design will resuft in financialhadship. Pennanent Confi dentiality: The applicant requests the exhibits listed above as pemanently confidential be permanently withheld from public review due to materials that contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. Sincerely, By: P-< P-*-, ' Dale Parvey Product Manager

External Photos 12687-10, Rev01

0190 Sho w num Do n and m chan temp So m may RFCo 9229 Aust i 05, UNIT, TA wn is an ima mber & bar co not move the model numb nged based o plate file. me printers re also need ad ode, Inc. Waterford Ce n in, TX 78758 AG, SATUR age of the lab ode sequenci e location of ber paramete on the Custom equire adjust djusting. Log nter Blvd. #500 RN, COMB bel created in ing program fthe data fiel ers “R142-i3 mer data for ments to the go shown fo 0 R n LabelView m. lds. The dat RF-000-04S the order. D e top and left or illustration REV 00 w (8.0) for ill ta fields: Gro S” will not ch Data to be pro t margins wh n only- may 08/24/11 lustration pu oup Code (“I hange. Seria ovided with hen printing vary. See B RFCo urposes. Lab IRFBDG”); al ID field (“ part order o due to inter OM for addi ode, Inc. belView is a Beacon “1-2 “00000001”) or as a modif rnal offsets. itional notes a serial 29B” rate ) must be fied label Darkness s. UNRELEASED 2 UNIT, SATURN A.HAMILTON 01587 rgraczyk UR NOTES:1) SEE BOM FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES.2) SECOND PAGE - LABEL DATA SHOW FOR REFERNCE. CENT ER LABEL HORIZONTALLY AND PLACE VERTICALLY APPROXIMATELY AS SHOWN. 3) LOCATE ITEMs 2 AND 4. HEAT STAKE.4) LOCATE ITEM 1, ITEM 6, AND ITEM 2 COVER. VERIFY THE LOCKING MECHANISM ON THE CONNECTOR ON THE PCA IS OPEN. POSITION ITEM 6 CABLE INTO OPENING ON ITEM 2 CO VER. INSERT CABLE. CLOSE LATCH. DO NOT REMOVE LINER ON BOTTOM OF ITEM 6. 5) LOCATE ITEM 2 BASE. POSITION ITEM 1 INTO BASE.6) LOCATE ITEM 2 OPTICS (2x). PLACE INTO HOLES IN I TEM 1. ENSURE RIGHT/LEFT OPTIC END IS CENTER OVER IR PCA COM PONENT ON ITEM 1. 7) INSERT BATTERIES ITEM 3 INTO HOLES IN ITEM 2.8) PLACE ITEM 2 COVER ON TOP OF ITEM 2 BASE.9) LOCATE ITEM 5 AND TIGHTEN SCREWS. ENSURE CENTER SCREW IS THROUGH THE HOLE IN ITEM 4 CLIP. 10) REMOVE LINER ON ITEM 6 AND CAREFULLY PLACE AT B OTTOM OF ITEM 2 COVER. 8/26/2011 D C B A ABC D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 MATERIAL & FINISH - SEE NOTES DRAWN SIZE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RF CODE IS PR OHIBITED. Default CHECKED 8/26/2011 COPYRIGHT © 2011, RF CODE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REV. THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION FRACTIONS DECIMALS ANGLES+/- 1/16 .XXX+/-.005 +/- 1/2 .X+/-.03 8/26/2011 SHEET 1 OF 2 TITLE 015873D MODEL FILE NAME PRODUCT DRAWING FILE NAME 512-439-2200 512-439-2199 FAX SCALE 1:1 01587.SLDDRW DO NOT SCALE DRAWING ENGINEER 3D MODEL CONFIGURATION NAME B DWG. NO. DATEDATEDATE RF CODE CONFIDENTIAL - STRICTLY PRIVATE .XX+/-.01UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEDDIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES.TOLERANCES ARE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF RF CODE. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE 9229 Waterford Center Blvd. #500 Austin, TX 78758 6 1 3 X 4 5 5 REV. SUFFIX DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED REVISIONS rgraczyk A.HAMILTON UNIT, SATURN 01587 A 8/26/2011 WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RF CODE IS PR OHIBITED. D C B A ABC D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 MATERIAL & FINISH - SEE NOTES DRAWN +/- 1/16 .XXX+/-.005 +/- 1/2 TITLE Default 8/26/2011 FRACTIONS DECIMALS ANGLES ENGINEER 512-439-2200 512-439-2199 FAX RF CODE CONFIDENTIAL - STRICTLY PRIVATE .XX+/-.01 CHECKED COPYRIGHT © 2011, RF CODE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. SCALE 1:1SIZE 3D MODEL CONFIGURATION NAME 015873D MODEL FILE NAME PRODUCT DRAWING FILE NAME .X+/-.03 THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION 01587.SLDDRW DO NOT SCALE DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 2 REV. B DWG. NO. DATEDATEDATE 8/26/2011 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEDDIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES.TOLERANCES ARE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF RF CODE. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE 9229 Waterford Center Blvd. #500 Austin, TX 78758 6 1 2 B SCALE 2 : 1 DETAIL A 3 DETAIL B SCALE 3 : 1 4 6 REV. SUFFIX DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED REVISIONS

R142 Internal Top R142 Internal Bottom R142 Internal Construction

Project 12687-10 Prepared for: RF Code, Inc. 9229 Waterford Centre Boulevard Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 By Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. 1601 N. A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B Round Rock, Texas 78665 October 10, 2011 MPE / RF Exposure Report Aurora: Saturn / Venus FCC ID: P6FPRXRFC 12145-10 Page 2 of 5 Table of Contents Title Page ........................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................2 Certificate of Compliance..............................................................................................................4 1.0 MPE Prediction ...................................................................................................................4 1.1 Evaluation Procedure .......................................................................................................4 1.2 Evaluation Criteria ...........................................................................................................4 NOTICE: (1) This Report must not be used to claim product endorsement, by NVLAP, NIST, the FCC or any other Agency. This report also does not warrant certification by NVLAP or NIST. (2) This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. (3) The significance of this report is dependent on the representative character of the test sample submitted for evaluation and the results apply only in reference to the sample tested. The manufacturer must continuously implement the changes shown herein to attain and maintain the required degree of compliance. 12145-10 Page 3 of 5 Applicant: RF Code, Inc. Applicant’s Address: 9229Waterford Centre Boulevard Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 FCC ID: P6FPRXRFC Project Number: 12687-10 Test Dates: August 29 th – September 2 nd , 2011 I, Layne Lueckemeyer, for Professional Testing (EMI), Inc., being familiar with the FCC rules and test procedures have reviewed the test setup, measured data and this report. I believe them to be true and accurate. Layne Lueckemeyer Product Development Engineer This report has been reviewed and accepted by RF Code, Inc. The undersigned is responsible for ensuring that this device will continue to comply with the FCC rules. _____________________________________ RF Code, Inc., Representative 12145-10 Page 4 of 5 1.0 MPE Prediction Prediction of MPE limit at a given distance was made by using equation from page 18 of OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01. In order to prove that SAR is not required we used the combined MPE calculation of the 433.92 MHz transmitter and the 915 MHz transmitter combined. The data is contained in the worksheet below. 1.1 Evaluation Procedure S=PG/4 R² Where: S = power density P= power input to antenna G = power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna 1.2 Evaluation Criteria MPE limit for uncontrolled exposure at prediction frequency (mW/cm²): 1.0 12145-10 Page 5 of 5 MPE Prediction Calculation PROJECT # DATE RULE DISTANCE ANTENNA RBW VBW DETECTOR 12687-10 October 10, 2011 15.231 / 15.247 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Calculations S=PG/4 R² Where: S = power density P= power input to antenna G = power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator R = distance to the center of radiation of the antenna MPE 433 MHz Transmitter Frequency (MHz) Peak Output Power (dBm) Peak Output Power (mW) Prediction Distance (cm) Max Antenna Gain (dBi) Max Antenna Gain (numeric) Power Density at 20.0 cm (mW/cm²) 433.92 -14.92 0.0322 20 2.0 1.585 .00000102 MPE 915 MHz Transmitter Frequency (MHz) Peak Output Power (dBm) Peak Output Power (mW) Prediction Distance (cm) Max Antenna Gain (dBi) Max Antenna Gain (numeric) Power Density at 20.0 cm (mW/cm²) 915 14.17 26.12 20 2.0 1.585 .00824048 NOTE: Antenna Gain is estimated worst case scenario. .00000102 + .00824048 = .0082415 mW/cm² .0082415 mW/cm² < 1.0 mW/cm² Result = Pass

RF Exposure Statement 1. Standard Applicable According to 1.1307 (b)(1), systems operating under the provisions of this section shall be operated in a manner that ensure that the public is not exposed to radio frequency energy level in excess of the Commission’s guideline. This is a portable/Mobile device. 2. Measurement Result: This a a portable device and the max peak output power is 14.17 dBm (26.12 W). Lower that low threshold 60/f GHz = mW (65.6 mW), d<2.5 cm general population category. The SAR measurement is not necessary.

1601 North A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B Round Rock, TX 78665 e-mail: [email protected] (512) 244-3371 Fax: (512) 244-1846 October 13, 2011 Ron Graczyk RF Code, Inc. 9229Waterford Centre Boulevard Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 Dear Ron: Enclosed is the Wireless Test Report for the Saturn R142-i3RF 915 MHz Transmitter by RF Code, Inc. This report can be used to demonstrate compliance with FCC requirements for wireless devices in the United States and Canada. This report must be used in conjunction with the accompanying RF Code Letter of Attestation, Rev. C. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jeffrey A. Lenk President Enclosure RF Code, Inc. – Saturn Wireless Certification Report 12687-10 October 19, 2011 Page 2 of 32 Project 12687-10 RF Code, Inc. Saturn R142-i3RF 915 MHz Transmitter Wireless Certification Report Prepared for: RF Code, Inc. 9229 Waterford Centre Boulevard, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78758 By Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. 1601 N. A.W. Grimes Blvd., Suite B Round Rock, Texas 78665 October 13, 2011 Revised October 19, 2011 Reviewed by Written by Jeffrey A. Lenk President Layne Lueckemeyer Product Development Engineer RF Code, Inc. – Saturn Wireless Certification Report 12687-10 October 19, 2011 Page 3 of 32 Table of Contents Title Page .........................................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction...........................................................................................................................5 1.1 Scope................................................................................................................................5 1.2 EUT Description ..............................................................................................................5 1.3 Modifications ...................................................................................................................6 1.4 Test Site ...........................................................................................................................6 1.5 Applicable Documents.....................................................................................................6 2.0 Output Power ........................................................................................................................8 2.1 Test Procedure .................................................................................................................8 2.2 Test Criteria .....................................................................................................................9 2.3 Test Results ......................................................................................................................9 3.0 Occupied Bandwidth...........................................................................................................14 3.1 Test Procedure ...............................................................................................................14 3.2 Test Criteria ...................................................................................................................14 3.3 Test Results ....................................................................................................................14 4.0 Power Spectral Density.......................................................................................................19 4.1 Test Procedure ...............................................................................................................19 4.2 Test Criteria ...................................................................................................................19 4.3 Test Results ....................................................................................................................19 5.0 Out of Band Spurious Emissions ........................................................................................22 5.1 Test Procedure ...............................................................................................................22 5.2 Test Criteria ...................................................................................................................22 5.3 Test Results ....................................................................................................................23 6.0 Antenna Requirements........................................................................................................31 6.1 Evaluation Procedure .....................................................................................................31 6.2 Evaluation Criteria .........................................................................................................31 6.3 Evaluation Results .........................................................................................................31 End of Report .................................................................................................................................32 THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL TESTING (EMI), INC. NOTICE: (1) This Report must not be used to claim product endorsement, by NVLAP, NIST, the FCC or any other Agency. This report also does not warrant certification by NVLAP or NIST. (2) This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. (3) The significance of this report is dependent on the representative character of the test sample submitted for evaluation and the results apply only in reference to the sample tested. The manufacturer must continuously implement the changes shown herein to attain and maintain the required degree of compliance. RF Code, Inc. – Saturn Wireless Certification Report 12687-10 October 19, 2011 Page 4 of 32 Applicant: RF Code, Inc. Applicant’s Address: 9229 Waterford Centre Boulevard, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78758 FCC…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

12687-10 Test Setup Photos