RXSCT5888GSM 900/1800/1900 MHz Tri-Band Mobile Phone

   Philips continuously strives to improve its products.Therefore, Philips reserves the rights to revise this userguide or withdraw it at any time without prior notice.Philips provides this user guide "as is" and does notaccept, except as required by applicable law, liabilityfor any error, omission or discrepancy between this user guide and the product described. The device is meant to be connected to the GSM/GPRS network.  Alphanumeri c keypad Left soft key Right soft key Navigation and OK key Charger and data cable connector Hang-up/ On/Off key Answer key Microphone Back of phone: Camera lens 65000 colour LCD       Press  (long press when charging the phone).     Enter the PIN code using thekeypad and press  or   .      The keypad will be lockedautomatically when the flip isclosed (whether or not thekeys on the phone's flip willalso be locked shall dependon the settings you havemade). When the flip of thephone is opened, thekeypad will be unlockedautomatically, while the keyson the phone's flip will belocked. Πηιλιπσ588.βοοκ Παγε 0 Φριδαψ, Μαρχη 17, 2006 5:04 ΠΜ BABT CE Certification Application 4.1_Special Instructions    Enter the phone numberusing the keypad and press .    When the phone rings, press .      During a call, press  /    to activate or deactivate handsfree mode.        During a call, press  to start recording. To end recording,pres  again.     Press  .      When the phone rings, longpress  .  !  When the phone rings, press . !       " During a call, press  or  .  " " Press  in idle mode.    #  Press  in idle mode. $ %    Press  or  to browse the phonebook entries and press  to call the selected contact in the phonebook.      Press  in idle mode.       Press  in idle mode.  &   Press   in idle mode.   '"  ( "  Press    in idle mode.         "    Press   when browsing the menu or inediting mode. )         "    #  % " Press  .     "    Press  and press  ,  ,  or  to select a menu, then press  to enter the sub- menu. Repeat this operationuntil you reached yourdesired menu. Πηιλιπσ588.βοοκ Παγε 1 Φριδαψ, Μαρχη 17, 2006 5:04 ΠΜ BABT CE Certification Application 4.1_Special Instructions   The left and right soft keys (  and  ) are located at the top of keypad area. Pressing the softkeys allowsyou to select the option displayed on the screendirectly above them, including options during a call.The functions of the soft keys change according to thecurrent context.   You can access the different features of your Philips588 phone from the main menu. The following tablesummarises the structure of the    , what the icons represent and the page number on which youcan obtain more information regarding the menufunctions. Press  in idle mode to access the main menu and press  ,  ,  or  to navigate through the icons and lists, or press  -  keys, and  or  keys to access the options and functions directly. Whennavigating through a list, the scrolling bar on the rightof the screen will indicate your current position in thelist. Press     or  to access the corresponding options of the selected item in the list. Press   to return to the previous menu.                !  "      #   !   !       Πηιλιπσ588.βοοκ Παγε 2 Φριδαψ, Μαρχη 17, 2006 5:04 ΠΜ BABT CE Certification Application 4.1_Special Instructions        This user guide strives to provide you with conciseand complete information regarding your Philips 588phone. It includes the following:  Some events may modify the idle screen (such asmissed calls, new SMS, new MMS, etc). Wheneverthere is a new event, the phone will emit an audiblealert (except for the reception of cell broadcastmessages). You can press  $ % to display the missed calls list, enter the list of unread SMS or MMS,etc. Press   to exit from the new events screen. At all times, you can only clear the new events from theidle screen by pressing   . & " ' The current section of this userguide. It summarises the features ofyour phone and the information onthe frequently-used features. ' ()* !    How to carry out installation, suchas SIM card, batteries, etc. ' +)   How to make and answer calls, aswell as some frequently used callfunctions. ' )# ,  " How to enter text using thealphanumeric keypad. '  -.(/ Description of the main features ofthis phone.   "Icons & Symbols", "Precautions","Troubleshooting", "Accessories"and "Limited Warranty"information. Πηιλιπσ588.βοοκ Παγε 3 Φριδαψ, Μαρχη 17, 2006 5:04 ΠΜ BABT CE Certification Application 4.1_Special Instructions   !   *+,  % +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -     +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .   "  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .'% % #  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ / 0+'   ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**      +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**     +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**    %+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**    "  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ *0!         " +++++++++++++++*0'   % +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++*0  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ *0       +++++++++++++…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. West M5 Building, No.1 East Road Jiuxianqiao, Chao Yang District, Beijing, CHINA Federal Communication Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division ATT ES TAT IO N FCC ID: RXSCT5888 Product: GSM900/1800/1900 Mobile Phone Model: Philips 588 We don’t provide any controls or software to allow operation outside the USA frequency band(s) when we sell this product in USA. Any question regarding this declaration, please contact us directly. Yours sincerely, ______________________________ Jane Wang TA Project Manager May 17, 2006 CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. Tel: +86 10 58270302 Fax: +86 10 84568718 E-mail: [email protected]

RE: ATCB FCC ID: RXSCT5888 1.) The Form 731 does not contain required information. Please provide (at minimum) a technical contact for line 2(a), and equipment specifications line 5. Re： Sorry, I have upated it. Please see file” RXSCT5888_731 form_Rev1.pdf” 2.) The confidential request letter should be addressed to FCC, not specifically ATCB. In addition, the confidential request letter asks for withholding the internal photographs from public view. This is not permitted. In addition, common files such as parts list and tune up procedure are allowed to remain without confidentiality. Please review and reconsider. Re： updated. Please see file “RXSCT5888_Confidentiality Request Letter_Rev1.pdf” 4.) The 15.19(a)(3) statement appears to be missing. It must either appear on the Label (preferred) or within the Manual. Kindly review. Re：updated. Please see file “RXSCT5888_User Manua_Rev1.pdf” 5.) This device is capable of connecting directly to a computer via a USB cable. This means an additional equipment authorization procedure is required when this device is considered a “computer peripheral”. This means either DofC or Certification to Part 15B is required. If DofC then the FCC logo must appear on the label and this device must be tested at a US recognized and accredited laboratory. Kindly review with your client. Re：You are right, we add the test of Part15B. We would like to get two Grant under one FCC ID. One is part15B, one is part 24. Please see file “” 8.) All Part 22/24 mobile phones with non-detachable antennas must have their rated RF power listed in terms of radiated values. For Part 22, all radiated power should be in terms of dipole equivalent power (ERP). For Part 24, all radiated power should be in terms of isotropic power (EIRP). Typically the FCC requires, according to Knowledge Base index 442401, that an “independent calibration substitution methods must be done”. This is often interpreted to mean that the calibration field to determine radiated power should be done at frequent intervals, and some argue that it should be done the day of the test. “Pre-calibration”, as expressed in Section 9.2 of the Test Report, is not sufficiently explained. Re：For general Radiated Emission (Field Strength in dBuV/m) test we adopted the method prescribed in ANSI C63.4, e.g. in semi-anechoic chamber with a reference ground plane and a turntable height of 80cm. See chapter 4.3 of the report FCC06-8001. For Radiated Power (EIRP or Spurious Radiation in dBm) test, "Substitution Method" should be used. The test procedure given in TIA-603-B-2002 is OK for EIRP/ERP test, but too complicated for spurious radiation test. It takes very long time to search so many spurious, varying the direction of the turntable and the height of the antenna, and then measure the signal generator level for each spurious with a proper antenna substituting the EUT. Many EMC lab now use full anechoic chamber for radiated power test. It's discribed in 3GPP TS 51.010-1 version 5.10.0 Release 5 (see attachment), the ETSI standard for mobile FTA certification. "The ground should be covered with absorbing material 1 m thick...". "...because the floor absorbers reject floor reflections, the antenna height need not be changed and shall be at the same height as the test sample." In full anechoic chamber, we can use "Pre-Calibration Method"(see attachment), the principle of which is similar to substitution method but the test procedure is simpler. The air lost of the site and the factors of the test system is calibrated before measurement, so the radiated power ("dBm-MHz" plots) can be obtained directly. We hope ATCB kindly accept this method. Thank you. 9.) FYI: The Block Edge test results in Section 5.5 and 8.5 appear unclear. It would be helpful if a smaller span was used and a limit line of -13dBm was shown. Re：According to FCC §24.238 (b), in the 1 MHz bands immediately outside and adjacent to the frequency block a resolution bandwidth of at least one percent of the emission bandwidth of the fundamental emission of the transmitter may be employed. Thus the 26dB emission bandwidth is measurement for showing compliance at the band-edges The test plots in section 8.5 showed 2MHz bands immediately outside and adjacent to the frequency block. The test plots also showed: RF output power measured, & The limit line (26dB from RF output power measured), & The edge of the frequency block 10.) Using the Internal Photographs, the antenna appears to align along a horizontal direction at the upper edge of the flip phone when used in a “normal” position. But using your Test Setup Photo (RSE) and the description in the Test Report [Section 9.2 (d)] the test procedure where only the vertical polarization at a fixed height may not produce the highest radiated power. Kindly recheck your results. If I have made any misjudgment about your procedure or the antenna position inside the phone, my apologies. FYI: I suggest that the height of the antenna be varied to assure that the highest radiated values are observed. Re：Sorry. The test procedure (Section 9.2) was a mislead. "The polarization of the receiving antenna was the same as that of the EUT transmitting antenna." This was correct for EUT with external rod antenna. But, for a mobile phone with internal antenna, we didn't break the it and check its antenna direction before the test. Instead, we measured both vertical and horizontal direction. The test plot was Maxhold value of both. I think I thould described it clearly in the report next time. 11.) FYI: When doing AC Conducted Emissions, FCC and ANSI C63.4 do not recognize the use of an extension cord or strip outlet in series with the LISN (Test Setup Photo CE and RE). Only AC powerline emissions where the wall mounted supply is plugged directly into the LISN is recognized. Re：You are right, Sir. We will performed the CE and RE tests again, with the mounted adapter plugged directly into the LISN. 12.) The DofC letter on page 100 of the Manual…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Date: 04 March, 2006 To: Federal Communications Commission, Authorization & Evaluation Division, 7435 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046 To Whom It May Concern: The CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. ,the undersigned, hereby authorizes Morlab, to act on the behalf of the CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. solely in matters relating to the application for an FCC equipment authorization for FCC ID # RXSCT5888 including the signing of documents in connection with this Application. Necessary acts carried out by CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. on our behalf of the CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. in connection with the Application shall have the same effect as acts of the CEC Wireless R&D Ltd.. The CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. also hereby certify that no party to this application is subject to a denial of benefits, including FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. 853(a).

Date: 29 April, 2006 To: Federal Communications Commission, Authorization & Evaluation Division, 7435 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046 Re:CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. FCC ID: RXSCT5888 FCC Part 15&24 Certification Confidentiality Request Gentlemen: This letter is to comply with 47 CFR 0.457(d)(2) pertaining to confidentiality material. CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. requests that the following documents regarding this submission for FCC ID: RXSCT5888 be kept confidential: 1. Block Diagram 2. Schematics 3. Operational Description 4. Part list/Tune-Up-Procedure Those documents contain detailed system and equipment description and related information about the product which CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. considers to be confidential proprietary, a custom design and ,otherwise, not releasable to the general public. Since this design is a basis form which future technological products will evolve, CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. considers this information would be of benefit to its competitors, and that the disclosure of the information in these documents would give competitors an unfair advantage in the market.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 May 3, 2006 RE: CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. FCC ID: RXSCT5888 I have a few comments on this Application. Depending on your responses, kindly understand there may be additional comments. 1.) The Form 731 does not contain required information. Please provide (at minimum) a technical contact for line 2(a), and equipment specifications line 5. 2.) The confidential request letter should be addressed to FCC, not specifically ATCB. In addition, the confidential request letter asks for withholding the internal photographs from public view. This is not permitted. In addition, common files such as parts list and tune up procedure are allowed to remain without confidentiality. Please review and reconsider. 3.) FYI: If Short Term Confidentiality is desired, please contact ATCB with specific details. STC may be tricky, and we must plan for it accordingly. 4.) The 15.19(a)(3) statement appears to be missing. It must either appear on the Label (preferred) or within the Manual. Kindly review. 5.) This device is capable of connecting directly to a computer via a USB cable. This means an additional equipment authorization procedure is required when this device is considered a “computer peripheral”. This means either DofC or Certification to Part 15B is required. If DofC then the FCC logo must appear on the label and this device must be tested at a US recognized and accredited laboratory. Kindly review with your client. 6.) FYI: In the future, a clearer copy of the Block Diagram would be appreciated. 7.) FYI: In the future, a clearer set of External Photographs would be welcome. 8.) All Part 22/24 mobile phones with non-detachable antennas must have their rated RF power listed in terms of radiated values. For Part 22, all radiated power should be in terms of dipole equivalent power (ERP). For Part 24, all radiated power should be in terms of isotropic power (EIRP). Typically the FCC requires, according to Knowledge Base index 442401, that an “independent calibration substitution methods must be done”. This is often interpreted to mean that the calibration field to determine radiated power should be done at frequent intervals, and some argue that it should be done the day of the test. “Pre-calibration”, as expressed in Section 9.2 of the Test Report, is not sufficiently explained. 9.) FYI: The Block Edge test results in Section 5.5 and 8.5 appear unclear. It would be helpful if a smaller span was used and a limit line of -13dBm was shown. 10.) Using the Internal Photographs, the antenna appears to align along a horizontal direction at the upper edge of the flip phone when used in a “normal” position. But using your Test Setup Photo (RSE) and the description in the Test Report [Section 9.2 (d)] the test procedure where only the vertical polarization at a fixed height may not produce the highest radiated power. Kindly recheck your results. If I have made any misjudgment about your procedure or the antenna position inside the phone, my apologies. FYI: I suggest that the height of the antenna be varied to assure that the highest radiated values are observed. 11.) FYI: When doing AC Conducted Emissions, FCC and ANSI C63.4 do not recognize the use of an extension cord or strip outlet in series with the LISN (Test Setup Photo CE and RE). Only AC powerline emissions where the wall mounted supply is plugged directly into the LISN is recognized. 12.) The DofC letter on page 100 of the Manual is very difficult to read. Could you kindly provide a clear copy of this document? 13.) The AC charger shown in the External Photos does not appear to be set up for 120Vac. Please confirm the AC conducted emissions test was performed at 120Vac z Page 2 May 3, 2006 14.) Please provide a manufacturing tolerance for the target values shown in the Tune Up procedure. 15.) Please provide a Z-axis plot as the probe is drawn away perpendicular from the hot spot in the phantom. This plot is required by FCC for the highest SAR plot for head and for body. 16.) There are no dipole validation plots associated with section 4.2.5 for either head or body. These validation tests must be performed on the same day as the final SAR tests. Kindly provide this data. 17.) The manual on page 49 appears to indicate this device is capable of GPRS operations. In most cases, all body SAR measurements are expected to utilize GPRS with at least a 1:4 duty cycle during testing. Please review. 18.) RF conducted power measurements are absent from this SAR report. In general, it is recommended that conducted power measurements be performed at the beginning of SAR testing to confirm that RF power duplicates that found in the Test Report. 19.) Kindly indicate where I can find the voltage and current through the final amplifying circuit as required by 2.1033(c)(8). 20.) An attestation letter indicating knowledge that this device contains GSM and DCS frequency bands not operational in USA or it’s territories is required. William H. Graff President and Director of Engineering mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 May 23, 2006 RE: CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. FCC ID: RXSCT5888 I have a few additional comments on this Application. I appreciate the work you have performed and commend you on the thoroughness of your written responses. However, there are some still some areas that need additional clarification. 1.) Kindly note that for all hand held mobile phones, RF power on Form 731 must always be expressed in terms of radiated units. For 850MHz Part 22 the units are in terms of ERP, and for 1900 MHz Part 24 the applicable units are in terms of EIRP. Please note I will revise this application form. 2.) Could you please indicate the page number in the manual where I may find the 15.19(a)(3) statement? 3.) Please upload your Part 15B test report. 4.) The FCC gives very little leeway to TCBs in accepting alternative test procedures for radiated emissions. The only document FCC recognizes is EIA/TIA 603. Consequently, this is the only procedure that I am permitted to use. For spurious emissions, I agree that using the substitution method is very time consuming, but it is a rule that must be followed. However, in practice the Commission will permit radiated field strength measurements to be substituted for any emissions which are 20 dB or more below the limit. If you choose to use this alternative procedure be sure that your test report clearly states this procedure as long as the final reported emissions are in terms of ERP/EIRP. 5.) With regard to the z-axis plot for SAR testing, the Commission insists upon having this illustration at the highest SAR positions for both head and body, and at 850 and 1900 MHz (when applicable). This serves as a double-check to insure that there are no RF reflections inside the phantom. I acknowledge that this can be difficult, but the Commission has been consistent throughout the years on this issue. Kindly review and provide this information at your earliest convenience. 6.) The tune-up procedure supplied shows a tolerance for PCS 1900 of +/- 3dB. Is this correct? FCC interpretations suggest that all testing for EMC and SAR should be at the upper power tune-up range for all testing. Based upon this information I question the reported maximum conducted power. The RF conducted power values listed in section 7.2 of the SAR report are significantly on the low side of that quoted in the tune up procedure. Also the RF power quoted in the test report section 6.5 is shown as over 30dBm. Agreement between the SAR report, EMC report and tune up procedure must be within 5% [.3dB]. In no case can the conducted RF power shown in the test report be higher than that shown in the SAR report. William H. Graff President and Director of Engineering mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted.

May 23, 2006 RE: ATCB FCC ID: RXSCT5888 1.) Kindly note that for all hand held mobile phones, RF power on Form 731 must always be expressed in terms of radiated units. For 850MHz Part 22 the units are in terms of ERP, and for 1900 MHz Part 24 the applicable units are in terms of EIRP. Please note I will revise this application form. Re：Thanks for your help. We will note it for next application. 2.) Could you please indicate the page number in the manual where I may find the 15.19(a)(3) statement? Re：Sorry, I forgot to indicate the page number. You can find it at last page of the “RXSCT5888_User Manua_Rev1.pdf” 3.) Please upload your Part 15B test report. Re: We have uploaded a new report of Part 15B, please see the file “RXSCT5888_Test Report Part15B.pdf” 4.) The FCC gives very little leeway to TCBs in accepting alternative test procedures for radiated emissions. The only document FCC recognizes is EIA/TIA 603. Consequently, this is the only procedure that I am permitted to use. For spurious emissions, I agree that using the substitution method is very time consuming, but it is a rule that must be followed. However, in practice the Commission will permit radiated field strength measurements to be substituted for any emissions which are 20 dB or more below the limit. If you choose to use this alternative procedure be sure that your test report clearly states this procedure as long as the final reported emissions are in terms of ERP/EIRP. Re: Updated. Please see the last page of “RXSCT5888_Test Report_Rev2.pdf”, content of Appendix III . 5.) With regard to the z-axis plot for SAR testing, the Commission insists upon having this illustration at the highest SAR positions for both head and body, and at 850 and 1900 MHz (when applicable). This serves as a double-check to insure that there are no RF reflections inside the phantom. I acknowledge that this can be difficult, but the Commission has been consistent throughout the years on this issue. Kindly review and provide this information at your earliest convenience. Re: Updated. Please see the page 85-94 of “RXSCT5888_SAR Report_Rev2.pdf”. 6.) The tune-up procedure supplied shows a tolerance for PCS 1900 of +/- 3dB. Is this correct? FCC interpretations suggest that all testing for EMC and SAR should be at the upper power tune-up range for all testing. Based upon this information I question the reported maximum conducted power. The RF conducted power values listed in section 7.2 of the SAR report are significantly on the low side of that quoted in the tune up procedure. Also the RF power quoted in the test report section 6.5 is shown as over 30dBm. Agreement between the SAR report, EMC report and tune up procedure must be within 5% [.3dB]. In no case can the conducted RF power shown in the test report be higher than that shown in the SAR report. Re: Update, please review the page 21-22 of “RXSCT5888_SAR Report_Rev2.pdf”, page 12 of “RXSCT5888_Test Report_Rev2.pdf” and page 12 of “RXSCT5888_tune_up_procedure_Rev2.pdf”

External Photos 1. Front View of EUT 2. Inside View of EUT 3. Back View of EUT 4. Side Views of EUT

Label Label Location

Internal Photos

Page2of96 No. SAR06-012A Page 3 of 96 Contents 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 2. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 2.1. Identification of the Responsible Testing Laboratory 2.2. Identification of the Responsible Testing Location(s) 2.3. Organization Item 2.4. Identification of Applicant 2.5. Identification of Manufacture 3. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) 3.1. Identification of the Equipment under Test 3.2. Identification of all used Test Sample of the Equipment under Test 4. OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS DURING TEST 4.1. Schematic Test Configuration 4.2. SAR Measurement System 5. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TEST 5.1. Applicable Limit Regulations 5.2. Applicable Measurement Standards 6. LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT 7. TEST RESULTS 7.1. Dielectric Performance 7.2. Summary of Measurement Results 7.3. Conclusion 8. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY 9. MAIN TEST INSTRUMENTS This Test Report consists of the following Annexes: Annex A: Accreditation Certificate Annex B: Test Layout Annex C: Sample Photographs Annex D: Graph Test Results Annex E: Tests for Body Side under GPRS mode Annex F: Tests 3D-Graph Annex G: Tests 2D-Graph No. SAR06-012A Page 4 of 96 1ˊGENERAL CONDITIONS 1.1 This report only refers to the item that has undergone the test. 1.2 This report standalone dose not constitute or imply by its own an approval of the product by the certification Bodies or competent Authorities. 1.3 This document is only valid if complete; no partial reproduction can be made without written approval of Shenzhen Electronic Product Quality Testing Center. 1.4 This report cannot be used partially or in full for publicity and/or promotional purposes without previous written approval of Shenzhen Electronic Product Quality Testing Center and the Accreditation Bodies, if it applies. No. SAR06-012A Page 5 of 96 2. Administrative Date 2.1. Identification of the Responsible Testing Laboratory Company Name: ShenZhen Electronic Product Quality Testing Center Department: Testing Department Address: Electronic Testing Building, ShaHe Road, NanShan District, ShenZhen, P. R. China Telephone: +86-755-26628676 Fax: +86-755-26627238 Responsible Test Lab Managers: Mr. Wang Keqin 2.2. Identification of the Responsible Testing Location(s) Company Name: ShenZhen Electronic Product Quality Testing Center Address: Electronic Testing Building, ShaHe Road, NanShan District, ShenZhen, P. R. China 2.3. Organization Item S.E.T Report No.: SAR06_012A S.E.T Project Leader: Mr. Li Sixiong S.E.T Responsible for accreditation scope: Mr. Wang Keqin Start of Testing: 2006-3-23 End of Testing: 2006-3-30 2.4. Identification of Applicant Company Name: CEC Wireless R&D Ltd. Address: West M5 Building, No.1 East Road, Jiuxianqiao, Chaoyang District, Beijing, P.R.China Contact person: Jane Wang Telephone: (+86) 10-58270302 Fax: (+86) 10-84568718 2.5. Identification of Manufacture Company Name: Philips (China) Investment Co., Ltd. Address: 27 Floor, Tower 1 Office Building Kerry Everbright C…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.