T9A-PADRFIDAM8S in PAD 3500

June 27 th , 2006 To Whom It May Concern, This document is intended to clarify the markings on a set of Skyetek M8 UHF RFID Reader modules utilized by our customer Adasa for FCC certification. Forty-eight production modules were marked PCA2.0.1, and were produced between 4-15-06 and 4-18-06. On all subsequent M8 production modules the equivalent markings are PCA2.0.2. The only difference between the two modules is that two hand-soldered connections on the PCA2.0.1 are replaced by traces internal to the PCB on the PCA2.0.2 boards. There is no functionality or component differences between the modules and 2.0.1 modules are equivalent to 2.0.2 for all purposes. The PCB labeling was changed as part of normal operational sequencing when there is any modification to a PCB, however small. Regards, Mark Swanson Director of Operations SkyeTek, Inc. Contact Information: Mark Swanson [email protected] 303-615-8084 This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.win2pdf.com. The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only.

16 May 2006 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, Maryland 21046 To whom it may concern, We, the undersigned, hereby authorize Northwest EMC, Inc., to act on our behalf, as our agent, in the following matters related to the FCC approval of our products: report submittal, related correspondence, the signing of all documents relating to these matters, and any other lawful activity necessary to obtain such certification. Any act carried out by Northwest EMC, Inc. within the scope of this authorization shall have the same affect as our own. This authorization shall expire 12 months from original date. Sincerely, Clarke McAllister President

NORTHWEST EMC, INC. 22975 NW Evergreen Parkway, Suite 400 Hillsboro, OR 97124 June 21, 2006 Dear Application Examiner: On behalf of Adasa, Northwest EMC Inc is submitting this application for the certification of Adasa's RFID Reader/Programmer, FCC ID: T9A-PADRFIDA. The Model M8S RFID radio is installed in Adasa's PAD 3500, and it is used to program tags on a roll as they are incremented. It operates in the 902-928 MHz band as a 15.247 frequency hopping transmitter. The unit is indirectly connected to the AC mains. The radio is co-located with an 802.11 WLAN radio, model WLNB-AN-DP101. The PAD 3500 is considered a portable device and has received SAR testing. The radio utilizes a custom integrated helical coil antenna. This configuration satisfies the requirements of 47 CFR 15.203. The receiver portion of this radio transceiver has been verified to FCC Part 15 Class A. The technical reports and exhibits demonstrate compliance with FCC rules 47 CFR 15.247 as a frequency hopping transmitter. Your efforts in reviewing this application are greatly appreciated. Best regards, Northwest EMC, Inc.

20 June 2006 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, Maryland 21046 To whom it may concern, We hereby respectfully request that under the provision of 47 CFR 0.459, the documents listed below and attached with this application for certification be provided with confidential status. • All Schematics • All Operational Descriptions • All Block Diagrams Any exhibit / information for which we have requested confidentiality, but which may not be accorded such treatment by the FCC, should be returned to us. The documents listed above contain trade secrets that are treated as confidential by us. Substantial competitive harm to us could result should they be made available to the public. Sincerely, Clarke McAllister President

NORTHWEST EMC, INC. 22975 NW Evergreen Parkway, Suite 400 Hillsboro, OR 97124 May 25, 2006 Dear Application Examiner: Adasa's RFID reader/programmer radio module, FCC ID: T9A-PADRFIDA, is seeking limited modular approval. The radio meets the requirements for limited modular approval as detailed in FCC Public Notice DA00-1407. Compliance to each of the requirements is described below: 1. "The modular transmitter must have its own RF shielding." The radio portion of the module is contained in its own RF shielding. The shielding will be installed by Adasa. Please see the Internal Photos exhibit and the Modifications portion of the test report. 2. "The modular transmitter must have buffered modulation/data inputs." The EUT has buffered data inputs to insure compliance with Part 15 requirements under conditions of excessive data rates or over-modulation. Please see the Schematics exhibit. 3. "The modular transmitter must have its own power supply regulation." The EUT has its own power supply regulation to insure compliance with Part 15 requirements regardless of the quality or level of external DC supplying the module from the host unit. Please see the Schematics exhibit. 4. "The modular transmitter must comply with the antenna requirements of Section 15.203 and 15.204(c)." The EUT meets the FCC antenna requirements. Please see Antenna Information exhibit and Internal Photos exhibit. 5. "The modular transmitter must be tested in a stand-alone configuration." The EUT was not tested in a stand-alone configuration. The module was installed in Adasa's PAD 3500. This is why Adasa is seeking limited modular approval of the RFID radio module in this host-specific configuration. 6. "The modular transmitter must be labeled with its own FCC ID number." The EUT is not labeled with its own FCC ID number since it will always be factory installed into the PAD 3500. The exterior of the PAD 3500 is labeled with the EUT's FCC ID number. Please see FCC ID label & location exhibit. 7. "The modular transmitter must comply with any specific rule or operating requirements applicable to the transmitter and the manufacturer must provide adequate instructions along with the module to explain any such requirements." The EUT is compliant with all applicable FCC rules. Detailed instructions for maintaining compliance are given in the User Manual. 8. The modular transmitter must comply with any applicable RF exposure requirements." The EUT is compliant with all applicable RF exposure requirements. Please see the SAR Report and the User Manual. Please contact us if you have additional questions. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Best regards, Northwest EMC, Inc.

Date/Time: 6/8/2006 11:39:59 AM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services System Performance Check @ 900MHz DUT: Dipole 900 MHz; Type: D900V2; Serial: 108 Communication System: CW 900 MHz; Frequency: 900 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 900 MHz; σ = 1.02 mho/m; ε r = 53; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section Room Ambient Temperature: 23.0deg. C; Liquid Temperature: 22.0 deg. C DASY4 Configuration: - Area Scan setting - Find Secondary Maximum Within: 2.0 dB and with a peak SAR value greater than 0.0012W/kg - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3552; ConvF(9.37, 9.37, 9.37); Calibrated: 5/30/2006 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 SN558; Calibrated: 1/20/2006 - Phantom: SAM 2; Type: SAM 2; Serial: 1050 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 21; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 170 d=15mm, Pin=250mW/Area Scan (7x9x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 2.87 mW/g d=15mm, Pin=250mW/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 53.4 V/m; Power Drift = 0.022 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 4.02 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 2.7 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 1.76 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 2.92 mW/g 0 dB = 2.92mW/g Date/Time: 6/8/2006 11:59:31 AM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services System Performance Check @ 900MHz DUT: Dipole 900 MHz; Type: D900V2; Serial: 108 Communication System: CW 900 MHz; Frequency: 900 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 d=15mm, Pin=250mW/Z Scan (1x1x41): Measurement grid: dx=20mm, dy=20mm, dz=2.5mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 1.97 mW/g

Date/Time: 6/8/2006 3:24:45 PM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services PAD 3500 DUT: PAD 3500; Type: Portable Applicator Device; Serial: N/A Communication System: RFID; Frequency: 915 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 915 MHz; σ = 1.03 mho/m; ε r = 52.9; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section Room Ambient Temperature: 23.0deg. C; Liquid Temperature: 22.0 deg. C DASY4 Configuration: - Area Scan setting - Find Secondary Maximum Within: 2.0 dB and with a peak SAR value greater than 0.0012W/kg - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3552; ConvF(9.37, 9.37, 9.37); Calibrated: 5/30/2006 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 SN558; Calibrated: 1/20/2006 - Phantom: SAM 2; Type: SAM 2; Serial: 1050 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 21; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 170 M ch with without Belt Clip/Area Scan (15x19x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.001 mW/g M ch with without Belt Clip/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 0.346 V/m; Power Drift = 0.177 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.011 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.0092 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.0087 mW/g Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.010 mW/g Date/Time: 6/8/2006 4:21:27 PM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services PAD 3500 DUT: PAD 3500; Type: Portable Applicator Device; Serial: N/A Communication System: RFID; Frequency: 915 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 915 MHz; σ = 1.03 mho/m; ε r = 52.9; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section Room Ambient Temperature: 23.0deg. C; Liquid Temperature: 22.0 deg. C DASY4 Configuration: - Area Scan setting - Find Secondary Maximum Within: 2.0 dB and with a peak SAR value greater than 0.0012W/kg - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3552; ConvF(9.37, 9.37, 9.37); Calibrated: 5/30/2006 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 SN558; Calibrated: 1/20/2006 - Phantom: SAM 2; Type: SAM 2; Serial: 1050 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 21; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 170 M ch with without Belt Clip with WLAN/Area Scan (15x19x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.127 mW/g M ch with without Belt Clip with WLAN/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 3.90 V/m; Power Drift = -0.155 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.337 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.120 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.057 mW/g Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.122 mW/g Date/Time: 6/8/2006 4:46:08 PM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services PAD 3500 DUT: PAD 3500; Type: Portable Applicator Device; Serial: N/A Communication System: RFID; Frequency: 915 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 M ch with without Belt Clip with WLAN/Z Scan (1x1x41): Measurement grid: dx=20mm, dy=20mm, dz=2.5mm Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.054 mW/g Date/Time: 6/8/2006 2:26:50 PM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services PAD 3500 DUT: PAD 3500; Type: Portable Applicator Device; Serial: N/A Communication System: RFID; Frequency: 915 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used (interpolated): f = 915 MHz; σ = 1.03 mho/m; ε r = 52.9; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section Room Ambient Temperature: 23.0deg. C; Liquid Temperature: 22.0 deg. C DASY4 Configuration: - Area Scan setting - Find Secondary Maximum Within: 2.0 dB and with a peak SAR value greater than 0.0012W/kg - Probe: EX3DV4 - SN3552; ConvF(9.37, 9.37, 9.37); Calibrated: 5/30/2006 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE4 SN558; Calibrated: 1/20/2006 - Phantom: SAM 2; Type: SAM 2; Serial: 1050 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.7 Build 21; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 170 M ch with Belt Clip/Area Scan (15x19x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.003 mW/g M ch with Belt Clip/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 1.13 V/m; Power Drift = 0.192 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.005 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.00275 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.00238 mW/g Info: Interpolated medium parameters used for SAR evaluation. Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.004 mW/g 0 dB = 0.004mW/g

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FCC REPORT OET BULLETIN 65 SUPPLEMENT C IC RSS 102 ISSUE 1 : 1999 AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY (ACA) STANDARD “RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION-HUMAN EXPOSURE) STANDARD 2003”, SCHEDULE 2 NEW ZEALAND STANDARD NZS 2772: PART 1: 1999 FOR RFID MODULE IS INSTALLED IN PORTABLE APPLICATOR DEVICE, PAD 3500 MODEL: M8S FCC ID: T9A-PADRFIDA REPORT NUMBER: 06U10353-1E ISSUE DATE: JUNE 27, 2006 Prepared for ADASA INC. PO BOX 2689, EUGENE, OR 97402, USA Prepared by COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES 561F MONTEREY ROAD, MORGAN HILL, CA 95037, USA TEL: (408) 463-0885 REPORT NO: 06U10353-1E DATE: June 27, 2006 FCC ID: T9A-PADRFIDA COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 2 of 24 Revision History Rev. Issued date Revisions Revised By -- June 12, 2006 Initial issue HS B June 15, 2006 Correction of typo in model number ND C June 20, 2006 Correction of typo in model number ND D June 21, 2006 Correction of typo in model number ND E June 27, 2006 Changing the EUT name in pages 3 and 5 ND This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. REPORT NO: 06U10353-1E DATE: June 27, 2006 FCC ID: T9A-PADRFIDA COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 3 of 24 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) DATES OF TEST: June 12, 2006 APPLICANT: ADDRESS: ADASA Inc. PO Box 2689, Eugene, OR 97402, USA FCC ID: MODEL: T9A-PADRFIDA M8S DEVICE CATEGORY: EXPOSURE CATEGORY: Portable Device General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure T9A-PADRFIDA is installed in Portable Applicator Device, PAD 3500 along with 802.11b radio module, FCC ID: T9A-PADWLNA. Test Sample is a: Prototype Frequency Range [MHz] The Highest SAR Values [mW/g] Collocation SAR Values [mW/g] 907.2 – 922.8 MHz 1g: 0.009 10g: 0.0087 1g: 0.124 10g: 0.057 This wireless portable device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 and had been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in FCC OET 65 Supplement C (Edition 01-01) and RSS 102. This wireless portable device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for General Population limits specified in the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) standard and had been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in Australian Communications Authority (ACA) standard “Radiocommunications (Electromagnetic Radiation-Human Exposure) Standard 2003”, Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 and New Zealand Standard “NZS 2772: Part 1: 1999”. Note: The results documented in this report apply only to the tested sample, under the conditions and modes of operation as described herein. This document may not be altered or revised in any way unless done so by Compliance Certification Services and all revisions are duly noted in the revisions section. Any alteration of this document not carried out by Compliance Certification Services will constitute fraud and shall nullify the document. No part of this report may be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any government agency. Approved & Released For CCS By: Tested By: Hsin Fu Shih Ninous Davoudi Senior Engineer EMC Engineer Compliance Certification Services Compliance Certification Services This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. REPORT NO: 06U10353-1E DATE: June 27, 2006 FCC ID: T9A-PADRFIDA COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SERVICES Page: 4 of 24 Table Of Contents 1 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DESCRIPTION............................................................................5 2 FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATION...................................................................................................5 3 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................................6 3.1 COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR TISSUE SIMULATIG LIQUIDS.................................7 4 SIMULATING LIQUID PARAMETERS CHECK...................................................................................8 4.1 SIMULATING LIQUID PARAMETER CHECK RESULT.............................................................. 9 5 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK..................................................................................................10 6 SAR MEASURMENT PROCEDURE.................................................................................................12 6.1 DASY4 SAR MEASURMENT PROCEDURE............................................................................13 7 PROCEDURE USED TO ESTABLISH TEST SIGNAL......................................................................14 8 SAR MEASURMENT RESULTS........................................................................................................15 8.1 PAD 3500 WITHOUT BELT CLIP-WORST CASE....................................................................15 8.2 PAD 3500 WITH BELT CLIP.....................................................................................................16 9 MEASURMENT UNCERTAINTY.......................................................................................................17 9.1 MEASURMENT UNCERTAINTY FOR 300 MHZ – 3000 MHZ.................................................17 10 EQUIPMENT LIST AND CALIBRATION............................................................................................18 11 PHOTOS............................................................................................................................................19 12 ATTACHMENTS.................................................................................................................................24 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of CCS. REPORT NO: 06U10353-1E DATE: June 27, 2006 FCC ID: T9A-PA…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

ADASA, Inc. M8S radio in PAD 3500 July 05, 2006 Report No. ADAS0002 Report Prepared By www.nwemc.com 1-888-EMI-CERT © 2006 Northwest EMC, Inc 22975 NW Evergreen Parkway Suite 400 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Certificate of Test Issue Date: July 05, 2006 ADASA, Inc. Model: M8S radio in PAD 3500 Emissions Test Description Specification Test Method Pass Fail Radiated Emissions FCC 15.109(g) (CISPR 22:1997) Class A:2005-10 ANSI C63.4:2003 Conducted Emissions FCC 15.107 Class B:2005-10 ANSI C63.4:2003 AC Powerline Conducted Emissions FCC 15.207 Class B:2005-9 ANSI C63.4:2003 Occupied Bandwidth FCC 15.247:2005-9 ANSI C63.4:2003 Channel Spacing FCC 15.247:2006-2 ANSI C63.4:2003 Dwell Time FCC 15.247:2006-2 ANSI C63.4:2003 Number of Hopping Frequencies FCC 15.247:2006-2 ANSI C63.4:2003 Output Power FCC 15.247:2006-2 ANSI C63.4:2003 Band Edge Compliance FCC 15.247:2006-2 ANSI C63.4:2003 Spurious Conducted Emissions FCC 15.247:2006-2 ANSI C63.4:2003 Spurious Radiated Emissions FCC 15.247(d):2005-9 ANSI C63.4:2003 Modifications made to the product See the Modifications section of this report Test Facility The measurement facility used to collect the data is located at: Northwest EMC, Inc. 22975 NW Evergreen Parkway, Suite 400; Hillsboro, OR 97124 Phone: (503) 844-4066 Fax: 844-3826 This site has been fully described in a report filed with and accepted by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and Industry Canada. Approved By: Greg Kiemel, Director of Engineering This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government of the United States of America. Product compliance is the responsibility of the client, therefore the tests and equipment modes of operation represented in this report were agreed upon by the client, prior to testing. This Report may only be duplicated in its entirety. The results of this test pertain only to the sample(s) tested, the specific description is noted in each of the individual sections of the test report supporting this certificate of test. Northwest EMC Revision History Revision 05/05/03 Revision Number Description Date Page Number 00 None Northwest EMC Accreditations and Authorizations Revision 03/18/05 FCC: Accredited by NVLAP for performance of FCC radio, digital, and ISM device testing. Our Open Area Test Sites, certification chambers, and conducted measurement facilities have been fully described in reports filed with the FCC and accepted by the FCC in letters maintained in our files. Northwest EMC has been accredited by ANSI to ISO / IEC Guide 65 as a product certifier. We have been designated by the FCC as a Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB). This allows Northwest EMC to certify transmitters to FCC specifications in accordance with 47 CFR 2.960 and 2.962. NVLAP: Northwest EMC, Inc. is accredited under the United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, and National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for satisfactory compliance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 for Testing Laboratories. The NVLAP accreditation encompasses Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing in accordance with the European Union EMC Directive 89/336/EEC, ANSI C63.4, MIL- STD 461E, DO-160D and SAE J1113. Additionally, Northwest EMC is accredited by NVLAP to perform radio testing in accordance with the European Union R&TTE Directive 1999/5/EEC, the requirements of FCC, and the RSS radio standards for Industry Canada. NVLAP LAB CODE 200629-0 NVLAP LAB CODE 200630-0 NVLAP LAB CODE 200676-0 Industry Canada: Accredited by NVLAP for performance of Industry Canada RSS and ICES testing. Our Open Area Test Sites and certification chambers comply with RSS 212, Issue 1 (Provisional) and have been filed with Industry Canada and accepted. Northwest EMC has been accredited by ANSI to ISO / IEC Guide 65 as a product certifier. We have been designated by NIST and recognized by Industry Canada as a Certification Body (CB) per the APEC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA). This allows Northwest EMC to certify transmitters to Industry Canada technical requirements. CAB: Designated by NIST and validated by the European Commission as a Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) to conduct tests and approve products to the EMC directive and transmitters to the R&TTE directive, as described in the U.S. - EU Mutual Recognition Agreement. TÜV Product Service: Included in TUV Product Service Group's Listing of Recognized Laboratories. It qualifies in connection with the TUV Certification after Recognition of Agent's Testing Program for the product categories and/or standards shown in TUV's current Listing of CARAT Laboratories, available from TUV. A certificate was issued to represent that this laboratory continues to meet TUV's CARAT Program requirements. Certificate No. USA0401C. TÜV Rheinland: Authorized to carryout EMC tests by order and under supervision of TÜV Rheinland. This authorization is based on "Conditions for EMC-Subcontractors" of November 1992. Northwest EMC Accreditations and Authorizations Revision 03/18/05 NEMKO: Assessed and accredited by NEMKO (Norwegian testing and certification body) for European emissions and immunity testing. As a result of NEMKO's laboratory assessment, they will accept test results from Northwest EMC, Inc. for product certification (Authorization No. ELA 119). Australia/New Zealand: The National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA), Australia has been appointed by the ACA as an accreditation body to accredit test laboratories and competent bodies for EMC standards. Accredited test reports or assessments by competent bodies must carry the NATA logo. Test reports made by an overseas laboratory that has been accredited for the relevant standards by an overseas accreditation body that has a Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) with NATA are also accepted as technical grounds for product conformity. The report should be endorsed with the respective…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.