TPO-OTD300-0Offender Tracking Device

TrackerPAL™ Operations Guide RemoteMDx, Inc. Version 1.1.0 April 26, 2006 Referenced To: OTD Hardware Release PP2b OTD Firmware Revision: v460 & v478 TrackerPAL™ Operations Guide RemoteMDx, Inc. Copyright © 2006 RemoteMDx, Inc. All rights reserved. Page 2 1 Overview This document describes the major features associated with the OTD Device Hardware and how to operate them. The operator may need to consult associated system documentation for additional detail. TrackerPAL™ Operations Guide RemoteMDx, Inc. Copyright © 2006 RemoteMDx, Inc. All rights reserved. Page 3 2 Personal Safety and Health Responsibilities of Administrating Agencies The TrackerPAL TM device meets the government’s requirements for exposure to radio waves. It is the direct and sole responsibility of all agencies (government or private) that oversee use of TrackerPAL TM to assure, and formally document, that wears of TrackerPAL TM devices understand the safety and health topics below. It is also the direct and sole responsibility of such parties to assess special individual needs in order to protect the health and well being of those wearing TrackerPAL TM devices. This includes identifying any special environmental or personal health needs specific to an individual wearer of the device. 2.1 Personal Hygiene Simple hygiene measures can avoid discomfort and skin irritations. The TrackerPAL TM is designed to be worn over a standard sock. This aids in maintaining sanitary conditions. Not wearing over a sock or not changing socks on a daily basis may result in skin irritations or other health concerns. The same applies for For additional comfort the wearer of a TrackerPAL TM may elect to wear a thick wrist sweat band on the ankle just below the main body of the TrackerPAL TM . Such a band may be purchased from most any sports store. Typically the band would be worn just above the ankle bone but may also be used to elevate the TrackerPAL TM to accommodate for special foot wear like work boots. 2.2 Specific Absorption Rate Data The TrackerPAL TM device meets the government’s requirements for exposure to radio waves. Your tracking device is a radio transmitter and receiver. It is designed and manufactured not to exceed limits for exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy set by the Federal Communications Commission TrackerPAL™ Operations Guide RemoteMDx, Inc. Copyright © 2006 RemoteMDx, Inc. All rights reserved. Page 4 (FCC) of the U.S. Government and by the Canadian regulatory authorities. These limits are part of comprehensive guidelines and establish permitted levels of RF energy for the general population. The guidelines are based on standards that were developed by independent scientific organizations through periodic and thorough evaluation of scientific studies. The standards include a substantial safety margin designed to assure the safety of all persons, regardless of age or health. The exposure standard for cellular communication devices employs a unit of measurement known as the Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR. The tests for SAR have been conducted based on the standard operating position (on the ankle) the tracking device transmitting at its highest certified power level in all tested frequency bands. Although the SAR is determined at the highest certified power level, the actual SAR level of the device while operating is usually well below the maximum value. This is because the cellular device is designed to operate at multiple power levels so as to use only the power required to reach the network. In general, the closer you are to a wireless base station, the lower the power output. Before a cellular device is available for sale to the public in the U.S. and Canada, it must be tested and certified to the FCC and Industry Canada that it does not exceed the limit established by each government for safe exposure. The highest SAR value for this device when tested for use on the ankle as described in this user guide, is: GSM 850 - 0.232 W/kg over 10g average GSM 1900 - 0.693 W/kg over 10g average Additional information on Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) can be found on the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA) Web Site: http://www.phonefacts.net or the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association (CWTA) Web Site: http://www.cwta.ca 2.3 Safety and General Information Exposure To Radio Frequency (RF) Energy Your TrackerPAL TM device contains a transmitter and receiver. When it is ON, it receives and transmits RF energy. When communicating with this device, the service network handling your call controls the power level at which your device transmits. Your TrackerPAL device is designed to comply with local regulatory requirements in your country TrackerPAL™ Operations Guide RemoteMDx, Inc. Copyright © 2006 RemoteMDx, Inc. All rights reserved. Page 5 concerning exposure of human beings to RF energy. RF Energy Interference/Compatibility Nearly every electronic device is subject to RF energy interference from external sources if inadequately shielded, designed, or otherwise configured for RF energy compatibility. In some circumstances your mobile device may cause interference with other devices. This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Potentially Explosive Atmospheres Areas with potentially explosive atmospheres are often but not always posted, and can include fueling areas such as below decks on boats, fuel or chemical transfer or storage facilities, or areas where the air contains chemicals or particles, such as grain, dust, or metal powders. When you are required to be in such an area, immediately contact your Supervision Officer or the TrackerPAL TM Monitoring Center before entering such areas. Do not remove, install, or charge batteries...sparks can occur and cause an …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

May 15, 2006 Motorola authorizes RemoteMDx with their certified test lab (Aprel) to use the g20 PC4 documentation supplied by Motorola for testing and certification of RemoteMDx’s TrackerPAL for FCC, IC and PTCRB requirements. Documents supplied for use includes, PICS/PIXIT, PTCRB test reports, DoC TS 51.010 Air Interface g20 PC4, IMEI_security_g20_PC4, approval screen shot of the g20 PC4, FCC test reports and the actual Motorola exhibits used for the g20 PC4 FCC submission, which were supplied under NDA. The following exhibits may be used for the filing with the FCC, but you must protect the confidentiality of the info in your filing process. RemoteMDx and their test lab must request confidentiality with FCC when submitting the three exhibits below per Motorola’s exhibit 13. Exhibit 4 Block diagram Exhibit 5 Schematics Exhibit 12 Operational Description. Aprel representing RemoteMDx in submitting for FCC and IC approval of the TrackerPAL and may use supporting documents supplied by Motorola on the Motorola g20 PC4 data module including PICS/PIXIT, PTCRB test reports, DoC TS 51.010 Air Interface g20 PC4, IMEI_security_g20_PC4 and the approval screen shot of the g20 PC4, FCC test reports, and FCC exhibits and is authorized to use the company name “Motorola”, product name “g20 PC4” and software version number “0C.04.76R” solely for the certification process of RemoteMDx’s TrackerPAL product which has the Motorola g20 PC4 data module embedded. Sincerely, Steve Gump Engineering Manager OEM Embedded Modules Motorola Inc.

May 15, 2006 Motorola authorizes RemoteMDx with their certified test lab (Aprel) to use the g20 PC4 documentation supplied by Motorola for testing and certification of RemoteMDx’s TrackerPAL for FCC, IC and PTCRB requirements. Documents supplied for use includes, PICS/PIXIT, PTCRB test reports, DoC TS 51.010 Air Interface g20 PC4, IMEI_security_g20_PC4, approval screen shot of the g20 PC4, FCC test reports and the actual Motorola exhibits used for the g20 PC4 FCC submission, which were supplied under NDA. The following exhibits may be used for the filing with the FCC, but you must protect the confidentiality of the info in your filing process. RemoteMDx and their test lab must request confidentiality with FCC when submitting the three exhibits below per Motorola’s exhibit 13. Exhibit 4 Block diagram Exhibit 5 Schematics Exhibit 12 Operational Description. Aprel representing RemoteMDx in submitting for FCC and IC approval of the TrackerPAL and may use supporting documents supplied by Motorola on the Motorola g20 PC4 data module including PICS/PIXIT, PTCRB test reports, DoC TS 51.010 Air Interface g20 PC4, IMEI_security_g20_PC4 and the approval screen shot of the g20 PC4, FCC test reports, and FCC exhibits and is authorized to use the company name “Motorola”, product name “g20 PC4” and software version number “0C.04.76R” solely for the certification process of RemoteMDx’s TrackerPAL product which has the Motorola g20 PC4 data module embedded. Sincerely, Steve Gump Engineering Manager OEM Embedded Modules Motorola Inc. APPLICANT: MOTOROLA, INC. FCC ID: IHDT56DB2 SPECIFICATION COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Engineer-in-Charge Equipment Authorization Branch Federal Communications Commission The transceiver of type IHDT56DB2 has been tested in accordance with the requirements contained in the appropriate Commission regulations. To the best of my knowledge, these tests were performed using measurement procedures consistent with industry or Commission standards and demonstrate that this equipment complies with the appropriate standards. Each unit manufactured imported or marketed, will conform to the sample tested within the variations that can be expected due to quantity production and testing on a statistical basis. Menashe Cohen Engineering HW Manager OEM embedded modules Design Center Eli Zakuto Engineering Manager OEM embedded modules Design Center Exhibit 2A APPLICANT: MOTOROLA, INC. FCC ID: IHDT56DB2 STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION The technical data supplied with this application, having been taken under my supervision is hereby duty certified. SIGNATURE: (signed) Menashe Cohen NAME: Menashe Cohen DATE: June 8 th , 2005 POSITION: Engineering HW Manager I hereby certify that the above application was prepared under my direction and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the facts set forth in the application and accompanying technical data are true and correct: SIGNATURE: (signed) Eli Zakuto NAME: Eli Zakuto DATE: June 8 th , 2005 POSITION: Engineering Manager Exhibit 2B

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 June 10, 2006 RE: FCC ID: TPO -OTD300-0 Attention: Stuart Nicol I have a few comments on this Application. Please note that further comments may arise in response to answers provided to the questions below. 1. Please note that the manual states that the use of this device is on the wrist or ankle. The manual does not appear to indicate any use worn on the body other than these locations. Please note that SAR testing was apparently done for body worn configurations as well as locations on areas such as ankles and wrists. As this device is not used in a body worn configuration other than wrist and feet/ankles, please explain the relevance of body SAR testing to this application (i.e. are there configurations not listed in the manual where the device can be worn on the body in other than wrist, hands feet? If so, please define these positions and please include some information in the manual. 2. Please note that the manual states a max SAR for ankle worn configuration is 4W/kg. Please note that the report states the max SAR for this configuration was only .693W/kg. Please explain the inconsistency and please correct as necessary. 3. Please note that TCBs cannot evaluate SAR for configurations using wrist, hands or feet (ankles). Please explain the relevance of this data in the TCB application. 4. Please note that part 24 is an EIRP measurement. Please note that the report (page 16) states that the limit for portable part 24 devices is 30dBm EIRP. This is not correct. Please note that the correct limit for part 24E is 2 watts EIRP or 33dBm. Please compare results to the proper limits when determining compliance margins. 5. Please note that page 16 of the report states that part 22H is an EIRP limit. Please note that this is not correct. Please note that part 22H is an ERP limit. Please use the correct and proper limits when comparing values for compliance. Please correct the report to show correct limits for part 22 and part 24. 6. Please note that page 10 the report states that “The output from the cable connecting the dipole was re-connected to an RF power meter. The effective radiated power (ERP) was read directly from the power meter.” Please note that this is not the ERP or EIRP as it does not include the gain of the dipole antenna. Please provide a sample formula used to determine ERP/EIRP values showing the proper addition of the substitution antenna and please correct the report as necessary to include this antenna gain value. 7. Please note that the power listed in the SAR report does not specify what kind of power is being listed. Is this conducted power or ERP/EIRP power. Please also note that conducted power must be within 0.5dB of that listed in the EMC report and within 3dB of the EMC report if ERP/EIRP is being used. Please provide information on which type power is being used for both part 22 and part 24 data. 8. Please note that the radiated spurious emissions data is not correct. Please note that ERP/EIRP is not the equivalent power into the dipole but is the power delivered to the dipole + the gain of the Dipole. Please correct the radiated spurious emissions to properly reflect actual ERP or EIRP (as appropriate) values for the associated rule parts (.e. ERP for part 22 and EIRP for part 24). 9. Please note that page 23 of the report states that the ‘power into the dipole” for the frequency 3819.6MHz is -13.63dBm. Please note that as mentioned in items 5 through 8, ERP and EIRP must include the value of the dipole gain. Please that that while part 22 values may be 0dB as the dipole gain compared to a dipole is 0, the EIRP of a dipole is approximately 2.16dBi. Please note that as this factor was not included in the value in the table mentioned above and because part 24 devices are EIRP and not ERP, the frequency listed appears to fail spurious emissions limits (- 13.63dBm + 2.16dBi = -11.47. Please retest as necessary and resubmit corrected data showing compliance to the proper limits. z Page 2 June 10, 2006 10. Please explain what relevance FCC ID: IHDT56dB1 has with this application (e.g. a statement to the fact that the data provided is still representative of the product being certified and that the product has not been modified in any way that may affect the results of the test data being used. Dennis Ward mailto:[email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

From: Stuart Nicol Sent: June 12, 2006 6:03 AM To: Arthur Brennan; Dan Brooks Subject: ATCB Responses 1. Please note that the manual states that the use of this device is on the wrist or ankle. The manual does not appear to indicate any use worn on the body other than these locations. Please note that SAR testing was apparently done for body worn configurations as well as locations on areas such as ankles and wrists. As this device is not used in a body worn configuration other than wrist and feet/ankles, please explain the relevance of body SAR testing to this application (i.e. are there configurations not listed in the manual where the device can be worn on the body in other than wrist, hands feet? If so, please define these positions and please include some information in the manual. At this time there is no methodology for the testing of SAR on the limbs, wrist, ankles, hands and feet. It is globally accepted that using a tissue composition for the body is an adequate way to demonstrate that the device complies and that by using the body tissue methodology we have demonstrated that we tested with a conservative approach to SAR requirements. We acknowledge that we could have demonstrated compliance with MPE and submitted data using this approach but it was a requirement that the device be tested completely to the appropriate SAR standards to gain a portable grant. 2. Please note that the manual states a max SAR for ankle worn configuration is 4W/kg. Please note that the report states the max SAR for this configuration was only .693W/kg. Please explain the inconsistency and please correct as necessary. This is an error on the user manual and has now been corrected to reflect the actual physical measured SAR value. [Art can you please correct this and re-issue to ATCB] 3. Please note that TCBs cannot evaluate SAR for configurations using wrist, hands or feet (ankles). Please explain the relevance of this data in the TCB application. The device has been tested using methodologies based on body SAR evaluations and the measured SAR has been gauged against the expected values for ankles, wrist and feet. We have not employed any new or unique methodologies for the evaluation of this device and as such feel that ATCB can review the data based on the accepted test methodologies as detailed in the reference section of the SAR report. 7. Please note that the power listed in the SAR report does not specify what kind of power is being listed. Is this conducted power or ERP/EIRP power. Please also note that conducted power must be within 0.5dB of that listed in the EMC report and within 3dB of the EMC report if ERP/EIRP is being used. Please provide information on which type power is being used for both part 22 and part 24 data. This is a type error in the SAR report and based on the original Motorola data which was received from the client. The same device was tested for both SAR and EMC it is expected that the deviation will be less that 1%. The SAR report has been updated to reflect the results from the EMC/EMI assessments. [Art can you get the data from Dan and please update the SAR report. I have measured the conducted power here in China and the values are 31.4, 31.9 and 31.7 for the Cellular 850 band and 28.9, 29.1 and 28.9 for the PCS bands so please make sure that the data for both reports is similar]

Sample FCC ID label to be located on the back of the unit on a screwed down plate

Antenna & SIM in main shell Antenna PCB bottom Antenna PCB top Microphone assembly Microphone in main shell Open front of the shell SIM PCB bottom SIM PCB with supercap Vibrator and Speaker APPLICANT: MOTOROLA INC. FCC ID: IHDT56DB1 Front View (Shields Removed) Rear View (Shields Removed) 1 EXHIBIT 9 APPLICANT: MOTOROLA INC. FCC ID: IHDT56DB1 2 EXHIBIT 9 Front View (With Shield) Rear View (With Shield)

SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training © 2005 APREL Laboratories E.& O.E. www.aprel.com [email protected] Page 1 of 30 Phone (613) 820-2730 Fax (613) 820-4161 Project number: RMDB-OTD-5224 FCC ID: TPO-O TD300-0 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of APREL Laboratories Applicant Name: Remote MDX Applicant Address: 150 West Civic Centre Drive Suite 400 Sandy, Utah 84070 Project Number: RMDB-OTD-5224 Test/Analysis Date: 22 nd May 2006 DUT Type Cellular 850 and PCS Antenna Type Internal Project Name Offender Tracking Device Received Status Pre Production M odel DUT Serial Number 2b.4-0006284 FCC ID TPO-O TD300-0 Experimental/Compliance Compliance Tx Frequency 824-849M Hz Cellular 850 1850-1910M Hz PCS Max Tx Power 26.75 dBm Cellular GSM(ERP) 29.51dBm PCS (EIRP) Conservative Averaged SAR (RF Exposure) 0.034 W/kg Cellular GSM Intended Use 0.058W/kg PCS Intended Use We the undersigned of APREL Laboratories, located at 51 Spectrum Way, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K2R-1E6, on the date indicated attest that the Device Under Test as detailed within this test report has been tested and found to be compliant with the Uncontrolled Environment RF exposure rules and regulations as defined by the methodologies, procedures, and standards as described in this document. SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training © 2005 APREL Laboratories E.& O.E. www.aprel.com [email protected] Page 2 of 30 Phone (613) 820-2730 Fax (613) 820-4161 Project number: RMDB-OTD-5224 FCC ID: TPO-OTD300-0 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of APREL Laboratories Table of Contents 1.0Introduction........................................................................................................................3 2.0Applicable Documents......................................................................................................4 3.0ALSAS-10U System Description ......................................................................................5 3.1Applications .......................................................................................................................6 3.2Visualisation and reporting ..............................................................................................6 3.3Field scans .........................................................................................................................6 3.3.1Area Scans.....................................................................................................................6 3.3.2Zoom Scan (Cube Scan Averaging) ............................................................................7 3.4Operator settings...............................................................................................................7 3.5ALSAS-10U Interpolation and Extrapolation Uncertainty .............................................7 4.0ALSAS-10U Hardware .......................................................................................................8 4.1Isotropic E-Field Probe .....................................................................................................8 4.2Isotropic E-Field Probe Specification..............................................................................9 4.3Boundary Detection Unit and Probe Mounting Device..................................................9 4.4Daq-Paq (Analog to Digital Electronics) .........................................................................9 4.5Axis Articulated Robot....................................................................................................10 4.6ALSAS Universal Workstation .......................................................................................10 4.7Universal Device Positioner ...........................................................................................11 4.8Phantom Types ................................................................................................................12 4.8.1APREL SAM Phantoms...............................................................................................12 4.8.2APREL Laboratories Universal Phantom .................................................................13 4.9Validation Dipoles ...........................................................................................................14 5.0Tissue Simulation Fluid ..................................................................................................15 5.1Tissue Calibration Procedure Using a Coaxial Probe .................................................16 5.2Tissue Calibration Results .............................................................................................16 6.0System Validation............................................................................................................17 6.1Experimental Results Summary ....................................................................................18 6.2SAR Measurement Procedure ........................................................................................18 6.3SAR Exposure Limits ......................................................................................................18 6.4Equipment List.................................................................................................................19 6.5SAR Measurement Results.............................................................................................20 Appendix A SAR Plots .................................................................................................................29 SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training © 2005 APREL Laboratories E.& O.E. www.aprel.com [email protected] Page 3 of 30 Phone (613) 820-2730 Fax (613) 820-4161 Project number: RMDB-OTD-5224 FCC ID: TPO-OTD300-0 Thi…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

51 Spectrum Way Tel. (613) 820 2730 Nepean, Ontario Fax (613) 820 4161 K2R 1E6, Canada e-mail: [email protected] SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training Since 1981 Exhibit 2A Test Reports Provided by APREL Laboratories In support of application FCC ID: TPO-OTD300-0 RF Power Output as Radiated (ERP) CFR 47 Parts 2.1046 and 22.913(a) Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) CFR 47 Parts 2.1046 and 24.232(b) Field Strength of Spurious Radiation CFR 47 Part 2.1053, 22.917(a) & Part 24.238(a) Compliance FCC CFR 47 Part 15, Subpart B, Class B, Unintentional Radiator © APREL Inc. 2006 Page 2 APREL Project No.: REMB-OTD-5224 This Report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training Since 1981 Engineering Report Assessment of Compliance with respect to FCC Rules & Regulations Parts 2, 22, 24 & DoC Part 15 Subpart B Class B for Remote MDx OTD Offender Tracking Device © APREL Inc. 2006 Page 3 APREL Project No.: REMB-OTD-5224 This Report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training Since 1981 Engineering Report Subject: Assessment of Compliance with Respect to FCC Rules & Regulations Parts 2.1046/22.913, 24.232 and 2.1053/22.917, 24.238 & DoC Part 15 Subpart B Class B FCC ID: TPO-OTD300-0 Product: Offender Tracking Device Model: Trackerpal OTD Client: REMOTEMDX INC. Address: 150 W Civic Center Dr Suite 400, Sandy, Utah, 84070 USA Project #: REMB-OTD-5224 Prepared By: APREL Laboratories, Regulatory Compliance Division © APREL Inc. 2006 Page 4 APREL Project No.: REMB-OTD-5224 This Report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training Since 1981 FCC ID: TPO-OTD300-0 Applicant: RemoteMDx Inc. Equipment: Offender Tracking Device Model: REMOTEMDX OTD Standard: FCC Rules and Regulations Parts 2.1046/22.913, 24.232 and 2.1053/22.917, 24.238 & DoC Part 15 Subpart B Class B ENGINEERING SUMMARY This report contains the results of the engineering evaluation performed on an Offender Tracking Device. The tests were carried out in accordance with the FCC Rules and Regulations Parts 2.1046/22.913, 24.232 and 2.1053/22.917, 24.238 & DOC Part 15 Subpart B Class B . Based on the test results, it is certified that the product meets the applicable requirements as set forth in the above specifications for Certification. © APREL Inc. 2006 Page 5 APREL Project No.: REMB-OTD-5224 This Report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training Since 1981 Offender Tracking Device REMOTEMDX OTD Summary of the Results Test Description Exhibit No. Page No. Test Set-up Figure No. Results Summary RF Power Output as Radiated (ERP) Ref. Parts 2.1046 and 22.913(a) 1A,B 11 1 Passed Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) Ref. FCC Parts 2.1046 and 24.232(b) 1A.B 11 2 Passed Field Strength of Spurious Radiation Ref. Paragraph 2.1053, 22.917(a) & Part 24.238(a) 2A,B 24 3 Passed Compliance FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class B, Unintentional Radiator 3A,B,C 4A,B 30,31 3 Passed © APREL Inc. 2006 Page 6 APREL Project No.: REMB-OTD-5224 This Report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training Since 1981 FCC SUBMISSION INFORMATION FCC ID: TPO-OTD300-0 Equipment: Offender Tracking Device Model: REMOTEMDX OTD For: Certification Applicant: REMOTEMDX INC. 150 W Civic Center Dr Suite 400, Sandy, Utah, 84070 USA Manufacturer: NexAira INC. Suite 310, 525 28 th St. SE Calgary, Alberta, T2A 6W9 Canada Test Laboratory: APREL Laboratories 51 Spectrum Way Nepean, Ontario Canada K2R 1E6 © APREL Inc. 2006 Page 7 APREL Project No.: REMB-OTD-5224 This Report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories SAR & HAC Instruments for Wireless • Consulting • Research • Standards • Compliance • Training S…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.