UOR-MOD950T1107Wireless Monitor Transmitter

INSTALLATION AND OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS The Wireless Monitor Receiver (950R1) automatically records sensor read- ings received from Field Transmitters (950T1) for collection and display on a computer. Each Field Transmitter can read up to four (4) Watermark soil moisture sensors, temperature sensors or Irrometer Model RSU (4-20mA transducer) sensors. The Receiver unit can also read a direct input from a switch closure sensor or rain gauge. SENSOR INSTALLATION Watermark soil moisture sensors must be “conditioned” prior to installation. The sensors should be soaked to saturation and then dried fully, twice, and then soaked to saturation again prior to installation. This “conditioning” of the sensors ensures quick response to changing soil moisture conditions. If a sensor is only soaked and then installed, several irrigation cycles must pass before the sensor will respond accurately. Soak the sensors in a bucket of water for several hours to saturate them. Hang them up overnight to dry sufficiently. After “conditioning” they are ready for installation. Sensors MUST be installed in an active portion of the root zone of the plant to be monitored, either vertically or up to a 45° angle. Bore a 7/8” (22mm) diameter access hole to the desired depth, then insert the sensor. Be careful to ensure a snug fit between the sensor and the surrounding soil. Then backfill the hole firmly. The access hole can be made by pounding a 7/8” (22mm) diameter bar (or ½” IPS pipe) to the desired depth, then extracting the bar, being careful not to disturb the soil surrounding the borehole. With hard or rocky soil, a larger diameter hole can be made with a soil auger. Mix the auger cuttings with water to create a slurry and pour into the borehole. Then insert the sensor into the hole. Once the slurry dries, the sensor will have been “grouted” in to ensure good contact with the soil. The sensor can be attached to ½” class 315 PVC pipe with a PVC to ABS cement. The pipe becomes a conduit to protect the sensor wires. Also, this makes the sensor easier to push into the access hole and remove, if desired. The top of this pipe section should be capped or plugged so surface water does not travel down to the sensor. Drill a small hole in the side of the pipe just above the sensor to allow water to drain away if it becomes trapped in the pipe. To measure soil temperature and compensate the accompanying Watermark sensors on the same Field Transmitter, the temperature sensor should be installed in the soil near a representative soil moisture sensor. Only one temperature sensor can be used per Field Transmitter. Bore a 1/2” (13mm) hole in the soil and insert the sensor. Then backfill the hole. #89 TROUBLESHOOTING Please reference the suggestions below, look in the Help section of WaterGraph or contact Irrometer for further assistance. No Display: Check battery, replace if <7.2 Volts. Try RESET, see below. Unusual readings: The following are possible readings that may be displayed instead of a soil moisture, temperature or switch position: DRY-meaning the resistance is so high that there must be an open wiring connection on a Watemark or a low temperature reading (frozen) on a temperature sensor, check for broken wires. SHORT- meaning the resistance is so low that the circuit must be shorted on a Watermark, or off scale on a temperature sensor, check for shorts. No reading reported for too long: Sensor may have lost contact with the soil. Re-install sensor, being sure to establish good soil contact. Communication may be poor from that location. Transmission can be checked from the Field Transmitter to the Receiver by pressing the small button in the middle of the transmitter circuit board. Each press of this button should register another reading on the counter in the display of the Receiver. Relocate or elevate antenna as necessary for better transmission. Soft RESET: Use the end of a paper clip or other small object to press the RESET button located underneath the small hole labeled RESET on the faceplate. Hard RESET: Disconnect the battery. Press and hold the RESET button down for at least 5 seconds. Then re-insert the battery. Firmware upgrading: Using the “Update Datalogger” command in the “Tools” menu in WaterGraph, select the new firmware version (.hex format) and press “Open.” If the upload process is interrupted, then Monitor will be locked up and it’s display will stay on “Uploading.” If this happens, use the “Recover Monitor Update” command in the “Tools” menu to finish the upload process. The Company Mail: P.O. Box 2424 Riverside, CA 92516 Phone: (951) 689-1701 Fax: (951) 689-3706 [email protected] www.Irrometer.com WARRANTY: The IRROMETER COMPANY warrants its products against defective workmanship or materials under normal use for one year from date of purchase. Defective parts will be replaced at no charge for either labor or parts if returned to the manufacturer during the warranty period. The seller’s or manufacturer’s only obligation shall be to replace the defective part and neither seller nor manufacturer shall be liable for any injury, loss or damage, direct or consequential,arising out of the use of or inability to use the product. This warranty does not protect against abuse, shipping damage, neglect, tampering or vandalism, freezing or other damage whether intentionally or inadvertently. SPECIFICATIONS 433 MHz, FCC Part 15 & IC compliant, license free for the user Records capacity: 8062 total readings from Field Transmitters 254 switch closures (127 irrigation events, date/time stamped) 254 rain gauge records (up 655 inches) Industry Canada Compliance Statement (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. 2 11 The Wireless Monitor Receiver should be mounted on a post at least 4 feet (1.2 m) high and within 1500 ft (457m) line-of- sight transmission range of the area where the…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

... . . . '. .... ~ \VATER~4ARI( Soil Moisture Sensor IRROMETER COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 2424, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516-2424 - (951) 689-1701 January 30, 2008 CETCB 114 Olinda Drive Brea, CA 92823 Gentlemen: This is a letter of authorization to accept any personnel of Compatible Electronics, Inc. as an Agent for Irrometer Co., Inc. P.O. Box 2424, Riverside, CA 92516, for a period of one year, to sign applications before the certification body on our behalf, to make representations to you on our behalf, and to receive and exchange data between our company and the certification body in connection with certification of the following Irrometer Co., Inc. product: Wireless soil moisture and temperature sensor data-logging system under FCC Docket Number 20780 and General Docket Number 80-284 pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Please also accept this letter as an attestation that neither Irrometer Co., Inc. nor any of its officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares, voting or non-voting, have been denied federal benefits under section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. 853(a). In addition, Irrometer Co., Inc. will notify the Federal Communications Commission if, at any time, the situation changes causing Irrometer Co., Inc. to be denied federal benefits. If you have any further questions or need additional information, please feel free to give me a call at (951) 689-1701. Sincerely, IRROMETER ... ~~! OFFICE AND SHIPPING ADDRESS: 8835 PHILBIN, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503 TELEFAX: (951) 689-3706 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBPAGE: http://www.irrometer.com lIM lrrltalion Assoclallon

Scott McCutchan From: Scott McCutchan [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 10:37 AM To: '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: FCC ID: UOR-MOD950T1107 11/30/2007 Mr. Fujimoto: In order for processing of this certification application (FCC ID: UOR-MOD950T1107) to continue, the following issue(s) will have to be addressed: 1) The authorization letter must be addressed to CETCB and not the FCC in the text of the letter. 2) The confidentiality letter must be signed by the applicant’s contact person on the application form. The item(s) indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 60 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal and forfeiture of the filing fee. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Please upload responses and/or exhibits to the electronic filing website. Your correspondence number is UOR-MOD950T1107-1. Best regards, Scott McCutchan Operations Manager Compatible Electronics TCB

Scott McCutchan From: Scott McCutchan [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 9:34 AM To: '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: FCC ID: UOR-MOD950T1107 1/24/2008 Mr. Fujimoto: In order for processing of this certification application (FCC ID: UOR-MOD950T1107) to continue, the following issue(s) will have to be addressed: 1) The individual signing the confidentiality request letter, authorization letter, single TCB submittal attestation letter, and the applicant contact listed on the application form, must be the same person associated with the FCC grantee code. 2) The authorization letter must either: list the specific individuals (by name) authorized to make representations on behalf of the applicant; or, state that anyone within the organization being authorized may make representations on behalf of the applicant. The item(s) indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 60 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal and forfeiture of the filing fee. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Please upload responses and/or exhibits to the electronic filing website. Your correspondence number is UOR-MOD950T1107-2. Best regards, Scott McCutchan Operations Manager Compatible Electronics TCB

Correspondence by Project Project Number: Correspondence NumberMemo UOR-MOD950T1107-1 1) The authorization letter must be addressed to CETCB and not the FCC in the text of the letter. Response: The letter has been revised to be addressed to CETCB 2) The confidentiality letter must be signed by the applicant’s contact person on the application form. Response: The grantee code has been revised with the FCC to show AJ Hawkins as the contact person Correspondence NumberMemo UOR-MOD950T1107-2 1) The individual signing the confidentiality request letter, authorization letter, single TCB submittal attestation letter, and the applicant contact listed on the application form, must be the same person associated with the FCC grantee code. The FCC Grantee code has been changed to show the contact person is the same individual. 2) The authorization letter must either: list the specific individuals (by name) authorized to make representations on behalf of the applicant; or, state that anyone within the organization being authorized may make representations on behalf of the applicant. the letter of authority has been revised and uploaded. 258265249

Report Number: B71031D1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Wireless Monitor Transmitter Model: 950 T1 Brea Division 114 Olinda Drive Brea, CA 92823 (714) 579-0500 Agoura Division 2337 Troutdale Drive Agoura, CA 91301 (818) 597-0600 Silverado Division 19121 El Toro Road Silverado, CA 92676 (949) 589-0700 Lake Forest Division 20621 Pascal Way Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 587-0400 Page 1 of 16 FCC PART 15, SUBPART B and C TEST REPORT for WIRELESS MONITOR TRANSMITTER MODEL: 950 T1 Prepared for IRROMETER COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 2424 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Prepared by:_____________________ KYLE FUJIMOTO Approved by:____________________ JAMES ROSS COMPATIBLE ELECTRONICS INC. 114 OLINDA DRIVE BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 (714) 579-0500 DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 2007 REPORT APPENDICES TOTAL BODY A B C D E PAGES 16 2 2 2 12 7 41 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compatible Electronics. Report Number: B71031D1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Wireless Monitor Transmitter Model: 950 T1 Brea Division 114 Olinda Drive Brea, CA 92823 (714) 579-0500 Agoura Division 2337 Troutdale Drive Agoura, CA 91301 (818) 597-0600 Silverado Division 19121 El Toro Road Silverado, CA 92676 (949) 589-0700 Lake Forest Division 20621 Pascal Way Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 587-0400 Page 2 of 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section / Title PAGE GENERAL REPORT SUMMARY 4 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 4 1. PURPOSE 5 2. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 6 2.1 Location of Testing 6 2.2 Traceability Statement 6 2.3 Cognizant Personnel 6 2.4 Date Test Sample was Received 6 2.5 Disposition of the Test Sample 6 2.6 Abbreviations and Acronyms 6 3. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 7 4. DESCIRPTION OF TEST CONFIGURATION 8 4.1 Description Of Test Configuration - EMI 8 4.1.1 Cable Construction and Termination 9 5. LISTS OF EUT, ACCESSORIES AND TEST EQUIPMENT 10 5.1 EUT and Accessory List 10 5.2 EMI Test Equipment 11 6. TEST SITE DESCRIPTION 12 6.1 Test Facility Description 12 6.2 EUT Mounting, Bonding and Grounding 12 7. TEST PROCEDURES 13 7.1 Radiated Emissions (Spurious and Harmonics) Test 13 7.2 Radiated Emissions (Spurious and Harmonics) Test (Continued) 14 7.3 Bandwidth of the Fundamental 15 8. CONCLUSIONS 16 Report Number: B71031D1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Wireless Monitor Transmitter Model: 950 T1 Brea Division 114 Olinda Drive Brea, CA 92823 (714) 579-0500 Agoura Division 2337 Troutdale Drive Agoura, CA 91301 (818) 597-0600 Silverado Division 19121 El Toro Road Silverado, CA 92676 (949) 589-0700 Lake Forest Division 20621 Pascal Way Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 587-0400 Page 3 of 16 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX TITLE A Laboratory Recognitions B Modifications to the EUT C Additional Models Covered Under This Report D Diagrams, Charts, and Photos • Test Setup Diagrams • Radiated Emissions Photos • Antenna and Effective Gain Factors E Data Sheets LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE 1 Plot Map And Layout of 3 Meter Radiated Test Site Report Number: B71031D1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Wireless Monitor Transmitter Model: 950 T1 Brea Division 114 Olinda Drive Brea, CA 92823 (714) 579-0500 Agoura Division 2337 Troutdale Drive Agoura, CA 91301 (818) 597-0600 Silverado Division 19121 El Toro Road Silverado, CA 92676 (949) 589-0700 Lake Forest Division 20621 Pascal Way Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 587-0400 Page 4 of 16 GENERAL REPORT SUMMARY This electromagnetic emission test report is generated by Compatible Electronics Inc., which is an independent testing and consulting firm. The test report is based on testing performed by Compatible Electronics personnel according to the measurement procedures described in the test specifications given below and in the "Test Procedures" section of this report. The measurement data and conclusions appearing herein relate only to the sample tested and this report may not be reproduced without the written permission of Compatible Electronics, unless done so in full. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Device Tested: Wireless Monitor Transmitter Model: 950 T1 S/N: N/A Product Description: See Expository Statement Modifications: The EUT was not modified during the testing. Manufacturer: Irrometer Company, Inc. P.O. Box 2424 Riverside, California 92516 Test Dates: October 29 and 30, 2007 Test Specifications : EMI requirements CFR Title 47, Part 15 Subpart B; and Subpart C, Sections 15.205, 15.209 and 15.231 Test Procedure: ANSI C63.4 Test Deviations: The test procedure was not deviated from during the testing. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS TEST DESCRIPTION RESULTS 1 Conducted RF Emissions, 150 kHz - 30 MHz This test was not performed because the EUT operates on battery power only and cannot be plugged into the AC public mains. 2 Radiated RF Emissions, 10 kHz – 4.4 GHz Complies with the Class B limits of CFR Title 47, Part 15, Subpart B; and Subpart C, sections 15.205, 15.209, and 15.231. Report Number: B71031D1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Wireless Monitor Transmitter Model: 950 T1 Brea Division 114 Olinda Drive Brea, CA 92823 (714) 579-0500 Agoura Division 2337 Troutdale Drive Agoura, CA 91301 (818) 597-0600 Silverado Division 19121 El Toro Road Silverado, CA 92676 (949) 589-0700 Lake Forest Division 20621 Pascal Way Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 587-0400 Page 5 of 16 1. PURPOSE This document is a qualification test report based on the Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) tests performed on the Wireless Monitor Transmitter Model: 950 T1. The EMI measurements were performed according to the measurement procedure described in ANSI C63.4. The tests were performed in order to determine whether the electromagnetic emissions from the equipment under test, referred to as EUT hereafter, are within the Class B specification limits defined by CFR Title 47, Part 15, Subpart B; and Subpart C, sections 15.205, 15.209, and 15.231. …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG P0 TDS SWT 200 ms Center 433.92 MHz20 ms/ 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 0.38 dB 140.280561 ms 1 [T1] 15.52 dB
V 106.012024 ms 1 [T1] 0.38 dB 140.280561 ms D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:16:18 Plot Showing the Pulses Trains are Greater than 100 mS Apart Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 100 ms Center 433.92 MHz10 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 1.62 dB 43.887776 ms 1 [T1] 15.38 dB
V 106.412826 ms 1 [T1] 1.62 dB 43.887776 ms D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:17:51 Time of One Pulse Train = 43.887776 mS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG P0 TDS SWT 50 ms Center 433.92 MHz5 ms/ 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 2.86 dB 40.180361 ms 1 [T1] 12.29 dB
V 4.905812 ms 1 [T1] 2.86 dB 40.180361 ms D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:30:01 Plot Showing the First 14 Pulses Note: The last 7 Pulses on this plot are pulses 15 to 21 which are shown on the next page Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 6.07 dB 741.482966
s 1 [T1] 9.99 dB
V 8.633267 ms 1 [T1] 6.07 dB 741.482966
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:33:41 Plot Showing Pulses 15 through 27 Note: The First 4 Pulses on the Plot are Pluses 11 to 14, which are shown on the previous page. Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V P0 TDS TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 4.98 dB -2.605210 ms 1 [T1] 12.10 dB
V 214.749499 ms 1 [T1] 4.98 dB -2.605210 ms D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:21:07 Time of First 2 Pulses = 2.605210 mS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] -2.36 dB -1.943888 ms 1 [T1] 16.00 dB
V 6.428858 ms 1 [T1] -2.36 dB -1.943888 ms D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:52:10 Time of Pulses #4, #6, #7, #9, #11, and #13 = 1.943888 mS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] -2.60 dB -260.521042
s 1 [T1] 14.12 dB
V 6.829659 ms 1 [T1] -2.60 dB -260.521042
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:52:31 Time of Pulses #3, #5, #8, #10, #12, and #14 = 260.521042 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 6.07 dB 741.482966
s 1 [T1] 9.99 dB
V 8.633267 ms 1 [T1] 6.07 dB 741.482966
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:33:41 Time of Pulse #15 = 741.482966 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] -0.66 dB 501.002004
s 1 [T1] 15.75 dB
V 9.474950 ms 1 [T1] -0.66 dB 501.002004
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:38:44 Time of Pulse #16 = 501.0020004 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 1.47 dB 541.082164
s 1 [T1] 11.02 dB
V 10.076152 ms 1 [T1] 1.47 dB 541.082164
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:39:26 Time of Pulse #17 = 541.082164 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 0.36 dB 300.601202
s 1 [T1] 13.37 dB
V 10.717435 ms 1 [T1] 0.36 dB 300.601202
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:42:13 Time of Pulse #18 = 300.601202 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 0.90 dB 340.681363
s 1 [T1] 11.83 dB
V 11.318637 ms 1 [T1] 0.90 dB 340.681363
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:42:43 Time of Pulse #19 = 340.681363 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] -1.79 dB 340.681363
s 1 [T1] 14.78 dB
V 11.959920 ms 1 [T1] -1.79 dB 340.681363
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:43:29 Time of Pulse #20 = 340.681363 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] -2.68 dB 941.883768
s 1 [T1] 14.76 dB
V 12.801603 ms 1 [T1] -2.68 dB 941.883768
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:45:40 Time of Pulse #21 = 941.883768 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 1 1 Delta 1 [T1] 2.61 dB 300.601202
s 1 [T1] 15.67 dB
V 13.843687 ms 1 [T1] 2.61 dB 300.601202
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:46:14 Time of Pulse #22 = 300.601202 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 kHz RF Att 10 dB A I2D Unit dB
V TRG SWT 20 ms Center 433.92 MHz2 ms/ P0 TDS 1VIEW1AP -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -18 82 11 Delta 1 [T1] 0.04 dB 541.082164
s 1 [T1] 15.01 dB
V 14.244489 ms 1 [T1] 0.04 dB 541.082164
s D1 40 dB
V Date: 30.OCT.2007 07:46:36 Time of Pulse #23 = 541.082164 uS Ref Lvl 82 dB
V Ref Lvl 82 dB
V RBW 100 kHz VBW 100 …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.