XPB-RC11Door Access Reader Controller

Reader Controller User guide FCC Statment This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment. This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: (1) Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. (2) Increase the separation between the equipment and receiver. (3) Connect the equipment to an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. (4) Consult the dealer or an experienced radio/TV technician for help. This device complies with RSS-210 of Industry Canada. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Le présent appareil est conforme aux CNR d’Industrie Canada applicables aux appareils radio exempts de licence.L’exploitation est autorisée aux deux conditions suivantes: (1) l’appareil ne doit pas produire de brouillage, et (2) l’utilisateur de l’appareil doit accepter tout brouillage radioélectrique subi, même si le brouillage est susceptible d’en compromettre le fonctionnement. This Class B digital apparatus complies with Canadian ICES-003. Cet appareil numérique de la classe B est conforme à la norme NMB-003 du Canada. For RF Safety and per FCC and Industry Canada regulations, the product should never be installed within 8-inches (20cm) of typical people locations. FCC ID: XPB-RC11 IC: 8053B-RC11

Willow Run (WR) Test Labs, Inc. 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Tel: (734) 252-9785, Fax: (734) 926-9785, e-mail: [email protected] Re: Certification for Schlage Lock Company / Allegion FCC ID: XPB-RC11 IC: 8053B-RC11 REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY Pursuant to USA FCC 47 CFR 0.457(d) and 0.459 and Canada IC RSP-100, Section 10, Schlage Lock Company / Allegionrequests that a part of the subject application be held confidential. Schlage Lock Company / Allegion has spent substantial effort in developing this product and it is one of the first of its kind in industry. Having the subject information easily available to ”competition” would negate the advantage they have achieved by developing this product. Not protecting the details of the design will result in financial hardship. Exhibit Conf. TypeRational Exh 04 - Block DiagramPermanentIncludes proprietary internal oscillator frequency information. Exh 05 - SchematicsPermanentIncludes proprietary design information Exh 10 - BOM + PlacementPermanentIncludes proprietary design information Exh 12 - Operational DescriptionPermanentIncludes proprietary design information Permanent Confidentiality:Schlage Lock Company / Allegion requests that any exhibits listed above as permanently confidential be permanently withheld from public review. Short-Term Confidentiality (FCC Only):Schlage Lock Company / Allegion requests that any exhibits selected above as short term confidential be withheld from public view for a period of days (noted above) from the date of the Grant of Equipment Authorization and prior to marketing. If there are any questions regarding the application or testing performed, please contact us at the above address or call (734) 252-9785, or e-mail [email protected]. Sincerely, Joseph D. Brunett Willow Run (WR) Test Labs, Inc. 9

Willow Run (WR) Test Labs, Inc. 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Tel: (734) 252-9785, Fax: (734) 926-9785, e-mail: [email protected] Attn.:Certification and Engineering Bureau, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada 3701 Carling Avenue, Bldg. 94 Ottawa, Ontario K2H 8S2 Re: Certification for Schlage Lock Company / Allegion RC11 IC: 8053B-RC11 If necessary, we have enclosed application materials for certification of Schlage Lock Company / Allegion RC11. It has been verified to comply with ISED RSS-210/GENe. Current Variants: There is only a single electrical version of the EUT, as tested. If there are any questions regarding the application or testing performed, please contact us at the above address or call (734) 252-9785, or e-mail [email protected]. Sincerely, Joseph D. Brunett Willow Run (WR) Test Labs, Inc. 11 Willow Run (WR) Test Labs, Inc. 7117 Fieldcrest Dr., Brighton, Michigan 48116 USA Tel: (734) 252-9785, Fax: (734) 926-9785, e-mail: [email protected] Attn.:Federal Communications Commission Equipment Approval Services P.O. Box 358315 Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5315 Re: Certification for Schlage Lock Company / Allegion RC11 FCC ID: XPB-RC11 If necessary, we have enclosed application materials for certification of Schlage Lock Company / Allegion RC11. It has been verified to comply with CFR Title 47, Part 15.209. Current Variants: There is only a single electrical version of the EUT, as tested. If there are any questions regarding the application or testing performed, please contact us at the above address or call (734) 252-9785, or e-mail [email protected]. Sincerely, Joseph D. Brunett Willow Run (WR) Test Labs, Inc. 10

Alberga Business Park, Bertel Jungin aukio 3 FI-02600 Espoo, Finland Phone: +358 9 435 5060 www.silabs.com RF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS Product FCC ID BGM111 Bluetooth Module QOQBGM111 Analysis for FCC, portable use Standalone SAR test exclusion considerations are defined in the KDB 447498 Chapter 4.3.1. 1-g head or body SAR exclusion threshold is defined with formula [(max . power of channel, including tun-up tolerance, mW)/(min. separation distance, mm.)]* (√f(GHz))≤3 For BGM111 the maximum TX power is 8.0 mW and maximum TX frequency is 2.48 GHz. Using separation distance of 5 mm with the formula above results 351.248.2 5 8        mm mW According to KDB 447498, if the separation distance is less than 5mm, then 5mm separation distance is used to calculate the RF exposure. Thus BGM111 meets the SAR exclusion criteria with 0 mm separation and SAR evaluation is not needed. Analysis for FCC, mobile use 2 22 /00159.0 )20(4 8 4 ... cmmW cm mW R PRIE S    E.I.R.P (mW) Evaluation distance R (cm) Power density S at prediction frequency (mW/cm 2 ) MPE limit for uncontrolled exposure at prediction frequency (mW/cm 2 ) Verdict 13 20 0.00135 1 PASS

Willow Run (WR) Test Labs, Inc. 7117 Fieldcrest Drive Brighton, MI 48116 Phone: (734) 252-9785,e-mail:[email protected] RF EXPOSURE CALCULATIONS Requirement: According to USA CFR 15 §1.1307 (b)(1), systems operating under the provisions of this section shall be operated in a manner that ensures thepublic is not exposed to radio frequency energy level in excess of the Commission’s guidelines. For Canada, RSS-102 sets out the requirements and measurement techniques used to evaluate radio frequency (RF) exposure compliance of radiocommunication apparatus designed to be used within the vicinity of the human body. Maximum Permissible Exposure Calculations: Summary: The EUT with all transmitters is compliant with both the FCC power density limit and the ISED ExposureEvaluation limits. USA REF: 1.1310, 2.1091/1093, 447498 D01 General RF Exposure Guidance v06 Test Date: 18-Dec-19 IC REF: RSS-102 Issue 5, Safety Code 6 Test Engineer: Min. Sep. Distance: 20 cm (Mobile) EUT: Allegion RC11 EUT Mode: Worst Case Meas. Distance: 3 meters Canada ISED RSS-102 MPEUSA FCC 1.1310 MPE ModeFreq.Worst Case E3(Avg)*E20cm(Avg)H20cm(Avg)SC6 Limit (E20cm)SC6 Limit (H20cm)Worst Case MPE RatioE20cm Limit***H20cm Limit***Worst Case MPE Ratio MHz LF Entry0.12500 70.2117.265.9135.30.0003 175.8124.20.0012 LF Entry13.56000 64.0111.059.7148.897.20.0133 155.7104.20.0060 ModeFreq.Worst Case EIRP(Avg)**E20cm(Avg)S20cm(Avg)****SC6 Limit (S20cm)MPE RatioS LimitMPE Ratio MHz BLE (module)2400-2483.5 11.15000129.871830.002595.474220.0005 1.00000 0.0026 MPE Total (<1):.014MPE Total (<1):.010 Complies? Yes Complies? Yes *As Measured / Computed from highest fundamental emission, see fundamental emission section of this report. **EIRP, as computed from Modular Device RF Exposure Exhibits. Joseph Brunett dBuV/mdBuV/mdBuA/mdBuV/mdBuA/mdBuV/mdBuA/m dBmdBuV/mmW/cm2mW/cm2mW/cm2 *** For FCC MPE,use of 300 kHz limit at 125 kHz as previously allowed by FCC. **** EIRP (mW) = S (mW/cm^2) x 4 x PI x 20cm^2

Amber Helm Development L.C. 92723 Michigan Hwy-152 Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USA Tel: 888-847-8027 EMC Test Report RC11-WR1922TX Issued:April 5, 2020 regarding USA: CFR Title 47, Part 15.209(Emissions) Canada:ISED RSS-210/GENe(Emissions) for RC11 Category: Door Access Reader Controller Judgments: 15.209/RSS-210 Compliant Transmitter Testing Completed: March 20, 2020 TESTING NVLAP LAB CODE 200129-0 Prepared for: Schlage Lock Company / Allegion 11819 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel Indiana 46032 USA Phone: +1 (317) 810-3700, Fax: +1 (317) 810-3051 Contact: Frank Nardelli, [email protected] Data Recorded by: Reviewed by: Dr. Joseph Brunett, EMC-002790-NEGordon Helm, EMC-002401-NE Prepared by:Date of Issue: April 5, 2020 Dr. Joseph Brunett, EMC-002790-NE A copy of this report will remain on file until May 2030.Page 1 of 22 Date: April 5, 2020Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / AllegionReport No.: RC11-WR1922TX Revision History Rev. No.DateDetailsRevised By r0April 5, 2020Initial Release.J. Brunett Contents Revision History2 Table of Contents2 1 Test Report Scope and Limitations4 1.1 Laboratory Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.2 Report Retention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.3 Subcontracted Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.4 Test Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.5 Limitation of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.6 Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.7 Endorsements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.8 Test Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1.9 Traceability and Equipment Used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 2 Test Specifications and Procedures6 2.1 Test Specification and General Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3 Configuration and Identification of the Equipment Under Test7 3.1 Description and Declarations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 3.1.1EUT Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.1.2Modes of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.1.3Variants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.1.4Test Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.1.5Functional Exerciser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.1.6Modifications Made . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.1.7Production Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.1.8Declared Exemptions and Additional Product Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 4 Emissions10 4.1 General Test Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.1.1Radiated Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.1.2Conducted Emissions Test Setup and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.1.3Power Supply Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.2 Intentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4.2.1Fundamental Emission Pulsed Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4.2.2Fundamental Emission Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.2.3Fundamental Emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.3 Unintentional Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.3.1Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.3.2General Radiated Spurious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4.3.3Conducted Emissions Test Results - AC Power Port(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5 Measurement Uncertainty and Accreditation Documents22 Amber Helm Development L.C., 92723 Michigan Hwy-152, Sister Lakes, Michigan 49047 USAPage 2 of 22 Date: April 5, 2020Prepared For: Schlage Lock Company / AllegionReport No.: RC11-WR1922TX List of Tables 1Test Site List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 2Equipment List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 3EUT Declarations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 4Pulsed Emission Characteristics (Duty Cycle). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5Intentional Emission Bandwidth.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 6Fundamental Radiated Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7Transmit Chain Spurious Emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8Radiated Digital Spurious Emissions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.