ZVP-F210DGSM Dual Band Mobile Phone

The F210d has been tested for hearing aid compatibility. This device has an M3 and T3 rating. When some F210d is rated T3. F210 d is rated M3. FCC ID: ZVP-F210D IC ID: 10262A-F210D IC ID: 10262A-F210D F210d Fig. 1 Fig. 3 Fig. 2 Fig. 4Fig. 5 InsertIng the sIM card Fig. 1: Remove the battery cover Fig. 2: Insert the SIM card with the gold chip down Insert the battery and chargIng Fig. 3: The battery contacts have to face the gold coloured contacts of the mobile phone. Fig. 4: Slide battery cover back to its previous position until its locked with a click. Fig. 5: Plug the charging cable into the socket. ¡Battery is charging: bars in the battery icon fill up ¡Battery is fully charged: bars in the battery icon stop moving Please note: The battery should be charged for at least 4 hours before your first call. Use only batteries and chargers which are approved for use with this model. PartNo: F210u_ShortManual-V2_54234-USA_201307 Warranty ¡This warranty is valid only if original emporia batteries were used. ¡Mobil phone: 12 month ¡Battery: 90 days Fcc hearIng-aId coMpatIbIlIty (hac) wireless devices are used near some hearing devices such as hearing aids and implants, users may detect a buzzing or humming noise. Some hearing devices are more immune than others to this interference noise. Wireless devices may also vary in the amount of interference they generate. The ratings for compatibility of digital wireless devices with hearing aids are described in the American Na- tional Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.19 standard: M-Rating: Phones rated M3 or M4 meet FCC requirements and are likely to generate less interference with hearing devices than phone that are not labeled. M4 is the better/higher of the two ratings. T-Rating: Phones rated T3 or T4 meet FCC requirements and are likely be more usable with hearing devices’ telecoil than unrated phones. T4 is the better/higher of the two ratings. The more immune the hearing aid device is, the less likely one is to experience interference noise from the wireless phone. Hearing aid devices may also be rated. Adding the rating of the hearing aid and the phone would determine probable usability: 1. Any combined rating equal to or greater than six offers the best use. 2. Any combined rating equal to five is considered normal use. The ratings are not guarantees. Results will vary depending on the user’s hearing device and hearing loss. If your hearing device happens to be vulnerable to interference, you may not be able to use this device success- fully. Trying out this device with your hearing device is the best way to evaluate it for your personal needs. This device has been tested and rated for use with hearing aids for some of the wireless technologies that it utilizes. However, there may be some newer wireless technologies used in this phone that have not been tested yet for use with hearing aids. It is important to try the different features of this phone thoroughly and in different locations, using your hearing aid or cochlear implant, to determine if you hear any interfering noise. Consult your service provider or the manufacturer of this phone for informa- tion on hearing aid compatibility. For information about hearing aids and digital wireless phones FCC Hearing Aid Compatibility and Volume Control: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/hearing.html Gallaudet University, RERC: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm sar Value The maximum value of Head SAR is 0.72 W/kg. The maximum value of Body Worn is 1.200 W/kg which was tested under the separation distance of 15 mm without any accessory. Fcc WarnIng 1. This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: ¡This device may not cause harmful interference. ¡This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. 2. Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment. Designed and manufactured not to exceed the emission limits for exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy set by the Federal Communications Commission of the U. S. Government. These limits are part of comprehensive guidelines and establish permitted levels of RF energy for the general population. The guidelines are based on standards that were developed by independent scientific organizations through periodic and thorough evaluation of scientific studies. The standards include a substantial safety margin designed to assure the safety of all persons, regardless of age and health. The exposure of measurement is known as the Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR. The SAR limit set by the FCC is 1.6 W/kg. Transmitting at its highest certified power level in all Your mobile phone is a radio transmitter and receiver. It is at the highest certified power level, the well below the maximum value. This is power levels so as to use only the power required to reach the network. In general, the closer you are to a wireless base station antenna, the available for sale to the public, it must be tested and certified to the FCC that it does not exceed the limit established by the government adopted requirement for safe exposure. The tests are performed in positions and locations (e.g., at the ear and worn on the body) as required by the FCC for each model. The FCC has granted an Equipment Authorization for evaluated as in compliance with the FCC RF exposure guidelines. SAR information on this model the Display Grant section of http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid after searching on When using any body worn accessory, please help to make sure it as least 1.5 cm clearance between phone and human body. The body worn accessory should not contain any metal. lIMIted Warranty This Emporia product is warranted to be free from defects in materials or workmanship for one (1) year from the date of purchase. In addition, the Emporia batteries used in the product are warra…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

SCS-F18: Project and Product Certification Representative Authorization Letter Page 1 of 2 Rev 3.0 775 Montague Expressway Milpitas, CA 95035 Tel: 408-526-1188 Fax: 408-526-1088 Email: [email protected] Project and Product Certification Representative Authorization Letter Reason for Amendment (current / obsolete) Revision History Approved Date From To Initial Release (obsolete) 1.0 1.0 Nov-14-2006 Revised wording (obsolete) 1.0 2.0 Sept–25-2007 Updated company template (current) 2.0 3.0 Jan-31-2012 SCS-F18: Project and Product Certification Representative Authorization Letter Page 2 of 2 Rev 3.0 Emporia Telecom USA Inc. 25 th July, 2013 To: SIEMIC, INC. 775 Montague Expressway, Milpitas, CA 95035 USA Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Project and Product Certification Representative Authorization Letter We, Emporia Telecom USA Inc. hereby authorize SIEMIC, INC. to act as a Certification Body for certifying for the following project(s): GSM Dual Band Mobile Phone, TELME F210D We affirm that between SIEMIC and Emporia Telecom USA Inc., any difference in understanding, including test plan, measurement methods, applicable standards and relevant procedures and processes have been resolved prior to commencement of testing activities. Sincerely, Signature Software Leader 321 E. Glen Ave, New Jersey, USA FCC ID ZVP-F210D Model : F210D

SCS-F19: Confidentiality Request Letter Page 1 of 2 Rev 3.0 775 Montague Expressway Milpitas, CA 95035 Tel: 408-526-1188 Fax: 408-526-1088 Email: [email protected] Confidentiality Request Letter Reason for Amendment (current / obsolete) Revision History Approved Date From To Initial Release (obsolete) 1.0 1.0 Nov-14-2006 Adding CFR 2.459 (obsolete) 1.0 2.0 August – 11 - 2008 Updated company template & Added text box (current) 2.0 3.0 Jan-31-2012 SCS-F19: Confidentiality Request Letter Page 2 of 2 Rev 3.0 Emporia Telecom USA Inc 25 th July, 2013 To: Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD Subject: Permanent Confidentiality Request for FCC ID: ZVP-F210D We hereby request confidential treatment of information accompanying this application as outlined below: - Block Diagram - Schematics - Operational Description - Tune up Procedure - Part List The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these materials may be harmful to the applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The applicant understands that pursuant to Section 0.457 & 0.459 of the Rules, disclosure of this application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the Grant for this application. Sincerely, Client’s signature : Client’s name / title: Silva Hoo, Software Leader Contact information / address: 321 E. Glen Ave, New Jersey, USA

External Photos EUT EUT External Photos EUT EUT External Photos EUT EUT External Photos EUT EUT External Photos EUT EUT External Photos EUT

Label Label Location

Internal Photos EUT EUT Internal Photos EUT EUT Internal Photos EUT EUT Internal Photos EUT EUT Internal Photos EUT EUT Internal Photos EUT EUT

No.2013EEB00281-BT Page1 of 64 FCC PART 15C TEST REPORT No. 2013EEB00281-BT For Emporia Telecom USA Inc GSM Dual Band Mobile Phone Model Name: F210d Market Name: TELME F210d With Hardware Version: F210D_HW_V2.0 Software Version: F210D_R026 FCC ID: ZVP-F210 IC ID: 10262A-F210 Issued Date: Jul 30 th , 2013 Test Laboratory: FCC 2.948 Listed: No.310359 IC O.A.T.S listed: No.6629C-1 Note: The test results in this test report relate only to the devices specified in this report. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of TMC Beijing. TMC Beijing, Telecommunication Metrology Center of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology No. 52, Huayuan Bei Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P. R. China 100191 Tel:+86(0)10-62304633-2678 , Fax:+86(0)10-62304633-2504 Email:[email protected]. www.emcite.com ©Copyright. All rights reserved by TMC Beijing. No.2013EEB00281-BT Page2 of 64 CONTENTS 1. TEST LABORATORY ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. T ESTING L OCATION ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2. T ESTING E NVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................... 5 1.3. P ROJECT DATA ................................................................................................................... 5 1.4. S IGNATURE ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. CLIENT INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. A PPLICANT I NFORMATION .................................................................................................... 6 2.2. M ANUFACTURER I NFORMATION ............................................................................................ 6 3. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT (AE) ............................. 7 3.1. A BOUT EUT ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.2. I NTERNAL I DENTIFICATION OF EUT USED DURING THE TEST ................................................... 7 3.3. I NTERNAL I DENTIFICATION OF AE USED DURING THE TEST ..................................................... 7 4. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................. 8 4.1. D OCUMENTS SUPPLIED BY APPLICANT .................................................................................. 8 4.2. R EFERENCE D OCUMENTS FOR TESTING ............................................................................... 8 5. LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 9 6. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ..................................................................................................... 10 6.1. S UMMARY OF T EST R ESULTS ............................................................................................ 10 6.2. S TATEMENTS .................................................................................................................... 10 6.3. T ERMS USED IN THE RESULT TABLE .................................................................................... 10 7. TEST EQUIPMENTS UTILIZED ..................................................................................................... 11 ANNEX A: EUT PHOTOGRAPH ............................................................................................................ 12 ANNEX B: MEASUREMENT RESULTS ................................................................................................ 14 B.0 A NTENNA REQUIREMENT ........................................................................................................ 14 B.1 M AXIMUM P EAK O UTPUT P OWER ........................................................................................... 15 B.2 B AND E DGES C OMPLIANCE .................................................................................................... 15 B.3 T RANSMITTER S PURIOUS E MISSION ....................................................................................... 16 B.3.1 Transmitter Spurious Emission - Conducted ............................................................................... 16 B.3.2 Transmitter Spurious Emission - Radiated .................................................................................. 17 B.4 O CCUPIED 20 D B B ANDWIDTH ................................................................................................ 19 B.5 T IME OF O CCUPANCY (D WELL T IME ) ....................................................................................... 19 B.6 N UMBER OF H OPPING C HANNELS .......................................................................................... 20 B.7 C ARRIER F REQUENCY S EPARATION ........................................................................................ 20 B.8 AC P OWER LINE C ONDUCTED E MISSION ................................................................................ 21 B.9 O CCUPIED B ANDWIDTH ......................................................................................................... 22 No.2013EEB00281-BT Page3 of 64 ANNEX C: TEST FIGURE LIST ............................................................................................................. 23 F IG . 1 B AND E DGES (GFSK, C H 0, H OPPING ON) ....................................................................... 23 F IG . 2 B AND E DGES (GFSK, C H 78, H OPPING ON) ..................................................................... 23 F IG . 3 B AND E DGES ( Π /4 DQPSK, C H 0, H OPPING ON) ...............................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Test Setup photos 1. Part 15C Radiated emission below 1GHz 2. Part 15C Radiated emission above 1GHz 3. Part 15C conducted emission (charger) 4. Part 15C conducted emission (USB)