HDCTRC4206L1Tracer 4206 System

TRACER 4206 System Manual 12804206L1ATRACER 4206 System (Plan A) 12804206L1BTRACER 4206 System (Plan B) 612804206L1-1A September 2002 Trademarks Any brand names and product names included in this manual are trademarks, registered trademarks, or trade names of their respective holders. To the Holder of the Manual The contents of this manual are current as of the date of publication. ADTRAN reserves the right to change the contents without prior notice. In no event will ADTRAN be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages or for commercial losses even if ADTRAN has been advised thereof as a result of issue of this publication. 901 Explorer Boulevard P.O. Box 140000 Huntsville, AL 35814-4000 Phone: (256) 963-8000 ©2002 ADTRAN, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed in U.S.A. 612804206L1-1A© 2002 ADTRAN, Inc.3 About this Manual This manual provides a complete description of the TRACER 4206 system and system software. The purpose of this manual is to provide the technician, system administrator, and manager with general and specific information related to the planning, installation, operation, and maintenance of the TRACER 4206. This manual is arranged so that needed information can be quickly and easily found. The following is an overview of the contents. Section 1System Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Provides managers with an overview of the TRACER 4206 system. Section 2Microwave Path Engineering Basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Explains the basics of analyzing a wireless microwave link, or path. The significant parameters are defined, and several recommendations are offered. Section 3Engineering Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Provides information to assist network designers with incorporating the TRACER 4206 system into their networks. Section 4Network Turnup Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Provides step-by-step instructions on how to install the TRACER 4206 unit, determine the parameters for the system, install the network and option modules, and power up the system. Section 5User Interface Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Explains the terminal interface and provides a description for each of the menus available for the TRACER 4206 system. Section 6Troubleshooting Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Provides helpful information for troubleshooting common configuration problems for the TRACER 4206 system. Revision History This is the first issue of this manual. 4© 2002 ADTRAN, Inc.612804206L1-1A Safety Instructions When using your telephone equipment, please follow these basic safety precautions to reduce the risk of fire, electrical shock, or personal injury: 1. Do not use this product near water, such as a bathtub, wash bowl, kitchen sink, laundry tub, in a wet basement, or near a swimming pool. 2. Avoid using a telephone (other than a cordless-type) during an electrical storm. There is a remote risk of shock from lightning. 3. Do not use the telephone to report a gas leak in the vicinity of the leak. 4. Use only the power cord, power supply, and/or batteries indicated in the manual. Do not dispose of batteries in a fire. They may explode. Check with local codes for special disposal instructions. Save These Important Safety Instructions Notes provide additional useful information. Cautions signify information that could prevent service interruption. Warnings provide information that could prevent damage to the equipment or endangerment to human life. 612804206L1-1A© 2002 ADTRAN, Inc.5 Federal Communications Commission Radio Frequency Interference Statement This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio frequencies. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense. This device is designed for commercial use only. Shielded cables must be used with this unit to ensure compliance with Class A FCC limits. Changes or modifications to this unit not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment. 6© 2002 ADTRAN, Inc.612804206L1-1A Radio Frequency Interface Statement This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for an intentional radiator, pursuant to Part 15, Subpart C of the FCC Rules. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy. If not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, it may cause interference to radio communications. Changes or modifications not expressly approved by ADTRAN could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment. 612804206L1-1A© 2002 ADTRAN, Inc.7 FCC Output Power Restrictions The FCC does not require licensing to implement this device. License-free operation in the industrial, scientific, and medical band is documented in FCC Rules Part 15.247. It is the responsibility of the individuals designing and implementing the radio system to assure compliance with any pertinent FCC Rules and Regulations. This device must be professionally installed. Exposure to Radio Frequency Fields The TRACER 4206 is designed to operate at 5.8 GHz with 100 mW maximum transmit power. This level of RF energy is below the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels specified in FCC OET 65:97-01. The installation of hi…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Corporate Office U.S. Mail Toll Free: 1 800 9ADTRAN 901 Explorer Blvd. P.O. Box 140000 Telephone: 256.963.8000 Huntsville, AL 35806 Huntsville, AL 35814-4000 http://www.adtran.com Date: May 5, 2004 American Telecommunications Certification Body, Inc. 6731 Whittier Avenue Suit C110 McLean, VA 22101 RE: Certification Application FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the following information is to be held confidential on behalf of ADTRAN Inc. for the Tracer 4206 product: • Schematics • Theory of operation • Block Diagram The application contains technical information which ADTRAN, Inc. deems to be trade secrets and proprietary. If made public, the information might be used to the disadvantage of the applicant in the market place. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Signatory Derek Foster Regulatory Compliance Engineer ADTRAN, Inc. 901 Explorer Blvd. Huntsville, AL 35806

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 September 9, 2004 RE: Adtran, Inc. FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 I have a few comments on this Application. Depending on your responses, kindly understand there may be additional comments. 1.) Kindly carefully define all antennas which will be used with this device. Please include in your list antenna gain, type, and part numbers (if available). 2.) The Manual has what appears to be an incorrect reference to 15.407. Will this device be used under 15.247 or 15.407? 3.) The Manual claims this is a Class A digital device. This is only partially true. The digital circuitry associated with digital signal processing can indeed be Class A. However, any emissions that are directly associated with the transmitter must meet the limitations of 15.207 and 15.209. It is unclear if this requirement has been met. No radiated data has been presented below 1GHz. Please review. 4.) The FCC no longer recognizes ANSI C63.4–1992 as the preferred standard for radiated emissions testing. Kindly refer to current editions of this document. 5.) Section 4.5.1 does not identify the dish antenna used with this filing. 6.) The MPE estimation identifies the largest antenna as +44dBi. Please review with regard to item #1 (above) in mind. 7.) Many plots presented in the Test Report do not show any vertical divisions. It is therefore impossible to correlate to the limits. Please review. 8.) The Manual has conflicting information as to the actual frequency plan used for this product. Please help me understand the differences. 9.) Please provide plots for spectral power density. 10.) Is this product designated for professional installation? If so, how is it marketed? 11.) The schematics and theory of operation are listed for Confidential treatment. However, the operational description also contains the Block Diagram which is not listed as Confidential. Please either remove the Block Diagram from the Theory of Operations or add Block Diagram to the Confidentiality Request. 12.) Please remember that all references to safe MPE distances throughout this filing must match. William H. Graff President and Director of Engineering mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. z Page 2 September 9, 2004 Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Dward ATCB From: Greg Snyder [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 12:17 PM To: Dennis Ward (E-mail 2) Subject: FW: End of Week Monitor/Survey of Application Progress Page 1 of 3 4/28/2005 Hi Dennis, Here's the comments. Thanks, Greg -----Original Message----- From: dward ATCB [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:59 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: End of Week Monitor/Survey of Application Progress Hi Greg I have taken over this application for Bill. The grant process can proceed as soon as the following outstanding issues are addressed: Item 1 Bills question about the antennae has not been adequately answered. The solution proposed is a simple note that says only the 28.5dBi antenna is approved. Section 5 of the manual states that, “if the installation antennas are not available, small, inexpensive dipole or patch antennas can be used for verification purposes.” Since only the 28.5dBi parabolic has been tested, and since the manual says only that antenna type can be used, this would cause violation of 15.203 the FCC rules, which states “ An intentional radiator shall be designed to ensure that no antenna other than that furnished by the responsible party shall be used with the device” . While 15.203 says this ‘does not apply’ to professional installation where certification is to be done using three sites as specified in 15.31d, it does say that “... the installer shall be responsible for ensuring that the proper antenna is employed so that the limits in this part are not exceeded.” In other words, even during professional installation, the use of approved antennae is still mandated in 15.203; you can’t just run out to Radio Shack and get an “inexpensive dipole” or “Patch antenna” to set this thing up even if you are a professional installer. The reason and subsequent problem with the statement in the manual is that the ‘setup antenna’ may be left by the installer for use by the end user until the ‘installation antenna’ is provided. Thus, an ‘inexpensive dipole’ or ‘patch antenna’ cannot be used on this device (installation or otherwise) until and unless that type antenna has been tested. Then only the type tested or an antenna of those types with lesser gain can be used. Consequently, the manual is confusing as to the types of antennae that can be used. Also, if installation was done in accordance with the manual this could possibly cause the device to violate the FCC rules. A more proper solution would be to remove references to all antennae that are not used with this device or provide radiated test data and MPE calculations along with any power considerations in the report. If the intent is to setup this device using a dipole or patch antenna, then those type antenna(s) need to have supporting data that the device is compliant under those conditions. Please adequately address this antenna issue. Item 3 Page 5 rf interference statement and page 6 rf interference statement from the manual are conflicting. Since the manual uses both a 15.105(a) Class A (page 5) and a 15.105(b) Class B (page 6) rf interference statement the indication is the device could be used in either a commercial or a residential environment. What is to prevent this system from being setup and used by a home office? If this can be done, then the digital device portion would have to be Class B and not Class A. Please explain how and why this device would never be used or sold to a residential environment. This would mean the Class B statement indicating residential compliance levels need to be removed and only commercial environment mentioned. Item 10 Professional Network Developers are not limited to commercial buildings. Some work out of their homes. Because of the reference to residential compliance in item 3 above, how does professional installation negate the use in a residential environment? Perhaps the manual should be more clear and state “For use in commercial environments only”. Item 11 The request for confidentiality does not have the Block diagram listed. While the Block Diagram does exist in the theory of operation, it has also been provided as a separate exhibit. So, while the theory of op may be confidential, the Block diagram exhibit will not be unless they modify the request for confidentiality to include it. As soon as these issues are addressed I can issue the grant. Thanks Dennis Ward > Evaluation Engineer > AmericanTCB > Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com > (703) 847-4700 > Direct: (703) 880 4841 Page 2 of 3 4/28/2005

Response to ATCB Comments FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 1 Washington Laboratories, Ltd. 7560 LINDBERGH DRIVE GAITHERSBURG, MD 20879 (301) 417 – 0220 FAX # (301) 417 - 9069 September 10, 2004 Mr. William Graff American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave McLean, VA 22101 RE: Comments of September 9, 2004 APPLICATION: FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 Adtran, Inc. Dear Mr. Graff: Below are the comments that you have provided regarding the application for certification referenced above. Our responses to those comments are in bold italic. Many responses refer you to additional exhibit(s) which has been uploaded to the application folder at the ATCB website. Thank you for your attention. Please feel free to contact us for any additional information that you may require. Regards, Gregory M. Snyder Chief EMC Engineer, Wireless/Telco Services Manager Brian J. Dettling Documentation Specialist WLL Project: 8028 1.) Kindly carefully define all antennas which will be used with this device. Please include in your list antenna gain, type, and part numbers (if available). R. A new User Manual containing the antenna types and gains has been uploaded. Please see exhibit “4206L1 User Manual Rev 1.pdf”. Antenna information is found on page 15 of 66. 2.) The Manual has what appears to be an incorrect reference to 15.407. Will this device be used under 15.247 or 15.407? Response to ATCB Comments FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 2 R. The device is to be used under 15.247. The reference to 15.407 has been removed from the revised User Manual. 3.) The Manual claims this is a Class A digital device. This is only partially true. The digital circuitry associated with digital signal processing can indeed be Class A. However, any emissions that are directly associated with the transmitter must meet the limitations of 15.207 and 15.209. It is unclear if this requirement has been met. No radiated data has been presented below 1GHz. Please review. R. No emissions from the transmitter were detected in the restricted bands below 1GHz. All emissions detected below 1GHz were determined to be from the baseband/digital signal processing circuitry. 4.) The FCC no longer recognizes ANSI C63.4–1992 as the preferred standard for radiated emissions testing. Kindly refer to current editions of this document. R. The incorrect reference located in Section 4.5.1 of the test report has been remedied. Please see exhibit “4206L1 Test Report Rev 1.pdf”. 5.) Section 4.5.1 does not identify the dish antenna used with this filing. R. Section 4.5.1 of the test report has been revised to identify the antenna used during testing. 6.) The MPE estimation identifies the largest antenna as +44dBi. Please review with regard to item #1 (above) in mind. R. The largest gain antenna was used during the MPE Evaluation. 7.) Many plots presented in the Test Report do not show any vertical divisions. It is therefore impossible to correlate to the limits. Please review. R. Markers indicating the bandedges of 5725M and 5850MHz have been placed on the limit line of Figures 16, 24, 29, and 38 of the revised test report. Figures 20 and 34 already have markers on the limit line indicating the bandedge. 8.) The Manual has conflicting information as to the actual frequency plan used for this product. Please help me understand the differences. R. The revised User Manual now indicates the correct frequencies. Response to ATCB Comments FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 3 9.) Please provide plots for spectral power density. R. Plots of the Power Spectral Density have been added to the revised test report. 10.) Is this product designated for professional installation? If so, how is it marketed? R. The product is for professional installation. The device is marketed to professional network developers. Professional installation is discussed on page 7 of the User’s Manual. 11.) The schematics and theory of operation are listed for Confidential treatment. However, the operational description also contains the Block Diagram which is not listed as Confidential. Please either remove the Block Diagram from the Theory of Operations or add Block Diagram to the Confidentiality Request. R. The Block Diagram was extracted from the Operational Description and submitted as a separate exhibit, which was not requested to be held confidential. Please refer to the previously uploaded exhibit “4206L1 Block Diagram.pdf.” 12.) Please remember that all references to safe MPE distances throughout this filing must match. R. Noted. It appears that the User Manual and MPE evaluation both agree on the distance listed for installation and the distance used for MPE calculations. Please indicate if there are references made to other distances and if so, where they are located. Please also note that exhibit “4206L1 RF Exposure Info Rev 1.pdf” has been uploaded to remedy editorial errors.

External Photos Front Rear Rear Panel Right Side Left Side Bottom

X.XXXXXX 2.125” +/- .020” 1.00” +/- .020” .100” RAD. DATEREVECO# COMMENT ORIGINAL REV PRODUCT DRAWN BYENGINEERAPPROVED BY A. HARTMAN TITLE SCALEDWG. NO. TRACER 4206 32898169 LABEL, FCC 1.00” 1:1 901 EXPLORER BVD. P.O. BOX 140000 HUNTSVILLE, AL 35814-4000 NOTES: 1. PRINT PER ARTWORK SUPPLIED. 2. MATERIAL: .002 WHITE MYLAR SUBSTRATE BLACK LETTERING, .001 CLEAR MYLAR OVERLAY LAMINATED, FLEXCON L-344 OR UL APPROVED EQUAL PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE BACKSIDE. 3. FONT: HELVETICA & ERAS DEMI, NO FONT SUBSTITUTIONS PERMITTED. 4. FILM: EMULSION SIDE UP. FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 IC: 2250A-4206L1 TRACER 4206 This equipment complies with part 15 of FCC rules.Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. 4/28/04 @AN/A E. NAHOLOWAA

FCC Label Location

Cover Removed RFC Board Baseband Board Signal Filter Cover Detail Overview Baseband Board Top, Detail A Baseband Board Top, Detail B Baseband Board Top, Detail C Baseband Board Top, Detail D Baseband Board Top, Detail E Baseband Board Bottom, Detail A Baseband Board Bottom, Detail B Baseband Board Bottom, Detail C Baseband Board Bottom, Detail D Baseband Board Bottom, Detail E

RFC Board Top Left RFC Board Top Right RFC Board Bottom Overview RFC Board Bottom Left, Main and Small Cover Removed RFC Board Bottom Center Detail RFC Board Bottom Right Main Cover Removed RFC Board Bottom Right Small Cover Removed Detail RFC Board Bottom, Far Right Side Signal Filter Signal Filter Connector Detail Signal Filter Cover Removed

Document 8028-MPE, Rev. 3 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 RF Exposure Evaluation Washington Laboratories, Ltd April 2005 Maximum Permissible Exposure Evaluation for Adtran TRACER 4206L1 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 August 2004 Revision 3, April 2005 WLL PROJECT #: 8028X This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the prior written consent of Washington Laboratories, Ltd. RF Exposure Evaluation Document 8028-MPE, Rev. 3 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 RF Exposure Evaluation Washington Laboratories, Ltd April 2005 1 Maximum Permissible Exposure Test Report for FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 1.0 Introduction This report has been prepared on behalf of Adtran Model: TRACER 4206L1 Transmitter to show compliance with the RF exposure requirements as defined in FCC §1.1307. The Revision 3 of this document is to revert back to using an antenna with gain up to 44.2dBi. 1.1 Requirements Three different categories of transmitters are defined by the FCC in OET Bulletin 65. These categories are fixed installation, mobile, and portable and are defined as follows: ƒ Fixed Installations: fixed location means that the device, including its antenna, is physically secured at a permanent location and is not able to be easily moved to another location. Additionally, distance to humans from the antenna is maintained to at least 2 meters. ƒ Mobile Devices: a mobile device is defined as a transmitting device designed to be used in other than fixed locations and to be generally used in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters is normally maintained between the transmitter's radiating structures and the body of the user or nearby persons. Transmitters designed to be used by consumers or workers that can be easily re-located, such as a wireless modem operating in a laptop computer, are considered mobile devices if they meet the 20 centimeter separation requirement. The FCC rules for evaluating mobile devices for RF compliance are found in 47 CFR §2.1091. ƒ Portable Devices: a portable device is defined as a transmitting device designed to be used so that the radiating structure(s) of the device is/are within 20 centimeters of the body of the user. Portable device requirements are found in Section 2.1093 of the FCC's Rules (47 CFR§2.1093). For this test report the Adtran TRACER 4206L1 is classified as a “Fixed Installation Device” and therefore must meet the limits as specified in §1.307. The FCC also categorizes the use of the device as based upon the user’s awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. The two categories defined are Document 8028-MPE, Rev. 3 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 RF Exposure Evaluation Washington Laboratories, Ltd April 2005 2 Occupational/Controlled Exposure and General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure. These two categories are defined as follows: ƒ Occupational/Controlled Exposure: In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. This exposure category is also applicable when the exposure is of a transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels may be higher than the general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. Awareness of the potential for RF exposure in a workplace or similar environment can be provided through specific training as part of a RF safety program. If appropriate, warning signs and labels can also be used to establish such awareness by providing prominent information on the risk of potential exposure and instructions on methods to minimize such exposure risks. ƒ General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure: The general population / uncontrolled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come under this category when exposure is not employment-related; for example, in the case of a wireless transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity. Warning labels placed on low-power consumer devices such as cellular telephones are not considered sufficient to allow the device to be considered under the occupational/controlled category, and the general population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to these devices. Since there are no warnings or training associated with this unit and it can be used by anyone, the Adtran TRACER 4206L1 is evaluated to the General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure limits. 1.2 Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure Evaluation The highest RF output power of the unit was measured at 19.5dBm at 5814 MHz. According to §1.1310 of the FCC rules, the power density limit for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure is 1mW/cm 2 . To comply with the exposure limits for this section, individuals must maintain a safe distance from the transmit antenna. The following formula was used to calculate the minimum safe distance: 2 4R PG S π = Where: S = Power Density Document 8028-MPE, Rev. 3 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 RF Exposure Evaluation Washington Laboratories, Ltd April 2005 3 P = Output Power at the Antenna Terminals G = Gain of Transmit Antenna (linear gain) R = Distance from Transmitting Antenna For this device, the calculation is as follows: S = FCC Limit = 1mW/cm 2 P = Output Power = 89.13 mW G = Worst Case Gain = 44.2 dBi = INVLOG(44.2/10) = 26302.7 R = Based on 4.6 meters (15 feet) specified in User’s Manual S = {(89.13 mW)(26302.7}/{(12.56)(460cm 2 )} = 0.882mW/cm 2 This power density is the worst case for maximum beam exposure. This level is below the limit of 1mW/cm2 MPE for general population/uncont…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Document 8028-01, Rev. 1 Certification Test Report Washington Laboratories, Ltd August 2004 FCC & Industry Canada Certification Test Report for ADTRAN, Inc. FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 IC: 2250A-4206L1 August 27, 2004 Prepared for: ADTRAN, Inc. 901 Explorer Blvd Huntsville, AL 35806 Prepared By: Washington Laboratories, Ltd. 7560 Lindbergh Drive Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879 FCC & IC Certification Test Report Document 8028-01, Rev. 1 Certification Test Report Washington Laboratories, Ltd August 2004 FCC & Industry Canada Certification Test Report for the ADTRAN, Inc. TRACER Transceiver 4206L1 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 IC: 2250A-4206L1 WLL JOB# 8028 Prepared by: Brian J. Dettling Documentation Specialist Reviewed by: Gregory M. Snyder Wireless/Telco Services Manager & Chief EMC Engineer Document 8028-01, Rev. 1 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 Certification Test Report Washington Laboratories, Ltd August 2004 ii Abstract This report has been prepared on behalf of ADTRAN, Inc. to support the attached Application for Equipment Authorization. The test report and application are submitted for a Digitally Modulated Transmitter under Part 15.247 of the FCC Rules and Regulations and Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Policy RSS-210 of Industry Canada. This Certification Test Report documents the test configuration and test results for an ADTRAN, Inc. TRACER 4206L1 Transceiver. Testing was performed on an Open Area Test Site (OATS) of Washington Laboratories, Ltd, 7560 Lindbergh Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20879. Site description and site attenuation data have been placed on file with the FCC's Sampling and Measurements Branch at the FCC laboratory in Columbia, MD. The Industry Canada OATS numbers are 3035A-1 and 3035A-2 for Washington Laboratories, Ltd. Site 1 and Site 2, respectively. Washington Laboratories, Ltd. has been accepted by the FCC and approved by NIST NVLAP (NVLAP Lab Code: 200066-0) as an independent FCC test laboratory. The ADTRAN, Inc. TRACER 4206L1 Transceiver complies with the requirements for a Digitally Modulated Transmitter device under FCC Part 15.247 and Industry Canada RSS-210. Document 8028-01, Rev. 1 FCC ID: HDCTRC4206L1 Certification Test Report Washington Laboratories, Ltd August 2004 iii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Compliance Statement ........................................................................................ 1 1.2 Test Scope ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Contract Information........................................................................................... 1 1.4 Test Dates ...................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.