KL7-602T-V1RFID Tag

SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice1 Keep This Document Savi P/N 805-00007-001 (Rev. A) Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Notice The Federal Communications Commission has established technical standards regarding radio frequency energy emitted by computer devices. This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference with radio/TV reception. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference, in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense. Changes or modifications to this equipment that are not expressly approved by Savi Technology could void the warranty and the authority to operate this equipment. Savi Technology is not responsible for radio/TV interference caused by using unauthorized cable or by making unauthorized changes to this equipment. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Label Statement This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following conditions: •This device may not cause harmful interference, and •This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. The label statement corresponds to the following devices: DeviceModelFCC ID Radio tagST-602-14KL7-602T-V1 Declaration of Conformity Hereby, Savi Technology, Inc., 351 East Evelyn Avenue Mountain View, California 94041-1530 declares that the SaviTag ST-602-14 is in compliance with the essential requirements and other relevant provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC. Industry Canada Notice: Model ST-602-14 IC: 2404A-602T1 This Class A digital apparatus complies with Canadian ICES-003 Cet appareil numérique de la classes A est confomé à la norme NMB-003 du Canada. Warning This is a Class A product. In a domestic environment this product may cause radio interference in which case the user may be required to take adequate measures. Savi Technology, Inc. 351 East Evelyn Avenue Mountain View, CA 94041-1530 Phone:(650) 316-4700 Fax:(650) 316-4750 E-mail:[email protected] Web site:www.savi.com Copyright ©2007, Savi Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. First edition printed July 2007. Copyright protection claimed includes all forms and matters of copyrightable material and information, now allowed by statutory or judicial law or hereinafter granted. Information in this guide is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment from the vendor. Savi is a registered trademark and EchoPoint is a trademark of Savi Technology, Inc. Other product names mentioned in this guide may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners and are hereby acknowledged. SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice CzechSavi Technology, Inc. tímto prohlašuje, že tento SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice je ve shodě se základními po_adavky a dalšími příslušnými ustanoveními směrnice 1999/5/ES. DanishUndertegnede Savi Technology, Inc. erklærer herved, at følgende udstyr SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice overholder de væsentlige krav og øvrige relevante krav i direktiv 1999/5/EF. GermanHiermit erklärt Savi Technology, Inc., dass sich das Gerät SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice in Übereinstimmung mit den grundlegenden Anforderungen und den übrigen einschlägigen Bestimmungen der Richtlinie 1999/5/EG befindet. EstonianKäesolevaga kinnitab Savi Technology, Inc. seadme SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice vastavust direktiivi 1999/5/EÜ põhinõuetele ja nimetatud direktiivist tulenevatele teistele asjakohastele sätetele. EnglishHereby, Savi Technology, Inc., declares that this SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice is in compliance with the essential requirements and other relevant provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC. SpanishPor medio de la presente Savi Technology, Inc. declara que el SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice cumple con los requisitos esenciales y cualesquiera otras disposiciones aplicables o exigibles de la Directiva 1999/5/CE. GreekΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΑ Savi Technology, Inc. ΔΗΛΩΝΕΙ ΟΤΙ SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice ΣΥΜΜΟΡΦΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΙΣ ΟΥΣΙΩΔΕΙΣ ΑΠΑΙΤΗΣΕΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΛΟΙΠΕΣ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΔΗΓΙΑΣ 1999/5/ΕΚ. FrenchPar la présente Savi Technology, Inc. déclare que l'appareil SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice est conformé aux exigences essentielles et aux autres dispositions pertinentes de la directive 1999/5/CE. ItalianCon la presente Savi Technology, Inc. dichiara che questoSaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice è conforme ai requisiti essenziali ed alle altre disposizioni pertinenti stabilite dalla direttiva 1999/5/CE. LatvianAr šo Savi Technology, Inc. deklarē, ka SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice atbilst Direktīvas 1999/5/EK būtiskajām prasībām un citiem ar to saistītajiem noteikumiem. LithuanianŠiuo Savi Technology, Inc. deklaruoja, kad šis SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice atitinka esminius reikalavimus ir kitas 1999/5/EB Direktyvos nuostatas. DutchHierbij verklaart Savi Technology, Inc. dat het toestel SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice in overeenstemming is met de essentiële eisen en de andere relevante bepalingen van richtlijn 1999/5/EG. MalteseHawnhekk, Savi Technology, Inc., jiddikjara li dan SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice jikkonforma mal-htigijiet essenzjali u ma provvedimenti ohrajn relevanti li hemm fid-Dirrettiva 1999/5/EC. HungarianAlulírott, Savi Technology, Inc. nyilatkozom, hogy a SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice megfelel a vonatkozó alapvetõ követelményeknek és az 1999/5/EC irányelv egyéb elõírásainak PolishNiniejszym Savi Technology, Inc. oświadcza, że SaviTag ST-602-14 Compliance Notice jest zgodny z zasadniczymi wymogami …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

July 17, 2007 American TCB 6731 Whittier Avenue, Suite C110 McLean, VA. 22101 Gentlemen: The enclosed documents constitute a formal submittal and application for a Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to the following: Subpart C of Part 15 of FCC Rules (CFR 47), sections 15.231(a) and 15.231(e) RSS-Gen Issue 2, June 2007, “General Requirements and Information for the Certification of Radiocommunication Equipment” RSS-210, Issue 7, June 2007, “Low-power Licence-exempt Radiocommunication Devices (All Frequency Bands): Category I Equipment” For a rf tag transmitter operating at 433.92 MHz with a 123kHz receiver. Data within this report demonstrates that the equipment tested complies with the relevant limits for unlicensed wireless devices. Elliott Laboratories, as duly authorized agent prepared this submittal. A copy of the letter of our appointment as agent is enclosed. If there are any questions or if further information is needed, please contact Elliott Laboratories for assistance. Sincerely, David W. Bare Chief Technical Officer DWB/dmg Enclosures: Agent Authorization Letter Emissions Test Report with Exhibits

SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2file:///P:/S/Savi%20Technology/J68552%20(ST-602-14)/submittal%20... 1 of 48/1/2007 12:58 PM From: Dward ATCB [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 7:38 PM To: Rod Thorne; [email protected] Cc: Eugene Schlindwein Subject: RE: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 Attachments: KL7-676T-V1 15-231 grant reprint.pdf; KL7-676T-V1 15-240 grant reprint.pdf; 2404A-676T IC certificate.pdf Hi Rod Attached are the FCC grants and the IC cert. Also, below is an excerpt from an IC email dealing with the IC label that is to be on a device. The company who is the applicant for the certification of a product must put on the label, their company name, the certification number and the model number on the label. When I say model number, I mean the model number (name) which was chosen by the company for certification purposes and which was on the Appendix I of RSP-100. This doesn't mean that the company cannot have another marketing name for their product and put it on the packaging and on the product itself. Example: Company "ABCD Telephone" has a product called "Super Telephone" (marketing name). They have obtained certification with certification number "9999A-SPTEL" and the model number is "SPT001". This is what they must do: On the label of the product they must put "ABCD Telephone", "9999A-SPTEL", and "SPT001". Additionnally, if they want to have the marketing name "Super Telephone" on the packaging and on the product, they can. Thanks Dennis Ward Evaluation Engineer American TCB Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com 703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888 direct - 703-880-4841 cell - 209-769-8316 NOTICE: This E-Mail message and any attachment may contain privileged or company proprietary information. If you received this message in error, please return to the sender. SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2file:///P:/S/Savi%20Technology/J68552%20(ST-602-14)/submittal%20... 2 of 48/1/2007 12:58 PM From: Rod Thorne [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 4:00 PM To: Dward ATCB; [email protected] Cc: Eugene Schlindwein Subject: RE: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 Dear Dennis: Page 6 of the FCC letter states the following: “Fixed UHF Readers equipped to operate under Section 15.240 will be installed and configured by factory-trained service personnel in locations that comply with the Section 15.240 site and registration requirements. In all other locations, Tag operations will default to modes that comply with Section 15.231 as detailed above.” This means that the Reader controls the tag, which will not operate as a 15.240 device unless it is queried by a Registered 15.240 Reader at listed locations. Tags are obviously mobile devices and we satisfied the FCC that the control functions reside in the Reader which is network-enabled only at a registered location. We will include the user notifications in our new Reader Manual, when we declare our readers to 15.240, which we have not yet done. Until we do, this tag will operate only at 15.231 with the existing infrastructure. The FCC themselves have been trying to decide how to obtain, record, and transmit the installation location information to the NTIA. For the moment, they have told us just to e-mail it to one of their appointed staff who will maintain the data base. So this issue has indeed been addressed during our long discussions with the OET since June. Hope this information is satisfactory. Regards, Rod From: Dward ATCB [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:23 PM To: Rod Thorne; [email protected] Subject: RE: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 HI Rod The grant and IC is being completed as I type. One question that has come up is how do you address 15.240(f) which states “As a condition of the grant, the grantee of an equipment authorization for a device operating under the provisions of this section shall provide information to the user concerning compliance with the operational restrictions in paragraphs (a) and (e) of this section. As a further condition, the grantee shall provide information on the locations where the devices are installed to the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology, which shall provide this information to the Federal Government through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.” If this is in the manual I could not find it. Perhaps Savi can provide a separate sheet with this info quickly. Thanks Dennis Ward Evaluation Engineer SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2file:///P:/S/Savi%20Technology/J68552%20(ST-602-14)/submittal%20... 3 of 48/1/2007 12:58 PM American TCB Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com 703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888 direct - 703-880-4841 cell - 209-769-8316 NOTICE: This E-Mail message and any attachment may contain privileged or company proprietary information. If you received this message in error, please return to the sender. From: Rod Thorne [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:53 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: FW: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 Dear Dennis: It’s unfortunate we didn’t handle the question about 231(e) yesterday when we had Julie on the phone. He is now out of the office for a while, so I don’t know when you will now receive an answer to the follow-up question. I’m copying David in case he has any insights to offer you. Regards, Rod From: Dward ATCB [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:28 PM To: Rod Thorne; 'Mark Briggs' Subject: FW: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 Hi Ron / Mark Please review the attached letter from the FCC and compare it with the actual filing to verify that this is indeed what was agreed. Also, I have an email into Julius Knapp on an issue. He did not include 15.231(e) in the letter and I wanted to make absolutely sure that the FCC was onboard with all three. Thanks Dennis Ward Evaluation Engineer American TCB Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com 703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888 direct - 703-880-4841 cell - 209-769-8316 NOTICE: This E-…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

RE: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2file:///P:/S/Savi%20Technology/J68552%20(ST-602-14)/submittal%20... 1 of 18/1/2007 1:00 PM From: Hilliard, David [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:14 PM To: Rod Thorne Subject: FW: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 -----Original Message----- From: Rashmi Doshi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 6:11 PM To: Julius Knapp; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Hilliard, David; Joe Dichoso Subject: RE: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 Dennis: Just one extra reminder. Please include the letter as a part of the filing so that we have on our record. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Joe Dichoso or me. Thanks, Rashmi Doshi, PhD Chief, FCC Laboratories -----Original Message----- From: Julius Knapp Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:47 PM To: '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Rashmi Doshi; Joe Dichoso Subject: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2 << File: SAVI PUBLIC JK Letter2.doc >> Dennis: Here is the letter we discussed in our teleconference this afternoon. As I stated over the phone, we have determined that the operations described in the letter are permissible. We expect to send a formal response confirming this shortly, but in the meantime there is no reason to hold up action on the application for certification provided it is consistent with the description in the letter and meets the relevant technical requirements. Thanks, Julius Knapp, Deputy Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) from Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP may constitute an attorney-client communication and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL and/or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, copy or forward this message. Please permanently delete all copies and any attachments and notify the sender immediately by reply email or by calling our Administrative Office at 202.719.7201. Thank You.

R R o o b b e e r r t t L L . . P P e e t t t t i i t t 220022..771199..77001199 rrppeettttiitt@@wwrrff..ccoomm 1776 K STREET NW WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE 202.719.7000 FAX 202.719.7049 Virginia Office 7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE SUITE 6200 McLEAN, VA 22102 PHONE 703.905.2800 FAX 703.905.2820 www.wrf.com November 30, 2005 Mr. Julius Knapp Deputy Chief Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Operation of New RFID System from Savi Technology, Inc. Dear Mr. Knapp: Savi Technology, Inc. (“Savi”), 1 is developing an RFID system for operation under Sections 15.231(a) and 15.240 of the FCC Rules, and the company respectfully requests that OET confirm Savi’s understanding of the applicability of the technical requirements in these rule sections to the RF devices that comprise the new system. The new approach is made possible by: (i) the recent change to Section 15.231(a) to allow the transmission of data along with a control signal, and (ii) the flexibility afforded to RFID devices by new rule Section 15.240. The Savi RFID system consists of a Low Frequency (“LF”) Transmitter, a UHF Reader and a Tag. LF Transmitters are fixed devices (e.g., they are mounted on a signpost or entranceway to a building). UHF Readers may be fixed or portable. Savi refers to its fixed UHF Reader as the Savi Reader (“SR”) and the portable UHF Reader as the Savi Mobile Reader (“SMR”). Each device’s field strength of emissions and signal bandwidth will comply with the requirements in the applicable rule section. This includes compliance with Section 15.35 of the FCC Rules. The system has a number of operational modes as described below. In accordance with Section 15.231(a), the signals from the UHF Reader and the Tag combine control signals with data. The UHF Reader sends commands along with data to the Tag pursuant to the operational modes described below. Similarly, the Tag signal includes commands that instruct the RFID system to take certain actions 1 Savi Technology is a worldwide leader in RFID solutions that enhance homeland security and deliver value through asset management applications. The company is the primary technology provider for the world’s largest RFID consignment monitoring network for the U.S. Department of Defense, which employs RFID, barcode, cellular and satellite communications systems to track more than 35,000 conveyances daily across a global network of 1,400 locations in more than 45 countries. Savi’s solutions have been proven to enhance operational efficiency, deliver substantial cost savings, reduce capital investment in supply chain assets, and optimize inventory levels. Mr. Julius Knapp November 30, 2005 Page 2 in response to the Tag and its associated asset. The Tag’s signal includes the Tag ID, LF Transmitter (or UHF Reader) ID, as well as asset routing and status information. The RFID System uses the information in the UHF Reader and Tag signaling to regulate, direct, and influence actions of the system. In particular, the ability of the Tag to direct certain actions is critical to the overall operation of the system. 2 Savi’s RFID system will be used to control and monitor the movement of tagged assets at border crossings, on planes, trains, boats, and trucks, and in warehouses and retail stores. The Tag signal provides direction to the RFID system that is used to take specific actions that control the physical movement of the asset. For example, the Tag signal sent in response to an LF signpost transmission may control the opening and closing of doors and gates, or control the automatic routing of a tagged asset to its intended destination, such as those used with airport baggage handling systems. The operational modes for the new RFID system are as follows: 1) LF Transmitter - Signpost Wakeup Command In the Signpost mode, the short-range LF Transmitter wakes up a Tag using a 123 kHz modulated signal that complies with Section 15.209 of the FCC Rules. A Tag that receives the Wakeup command responds by transmitting a 433.92 MHz control signal to a UHF Reader. The Tag may retransmit the same message if the Tag does not receive an acknowledgement from the UHF Reader, but in no event will the Tag’s total transmission time exceed 5 seconds. Thus, the Tag transmission sequence complies with Section 15.231(a). The UHF Reader acknowledges receipt of the Tag message by transmitting a control signal to place the Tag into the Sleep mode. A timing diagram depicting the transmissions from the LF Transmitter, the Tag, and UHF Reader is shown below. 2 Savi’s RFID system uses the control information in the Tag signal to take action with regard to specific assets. For example, the Tag’s request to be interrogated by UHF Readers at inspection locations leads to segregation (and possible human intervention) if specific assets are identified or if security, battery maintenance, asset damage, or environmental threshold alarm flags are activated. The alarm flags associated with an asset may change state at any time. Thus, the Tag transmission commands the system to evaluate these parameters, to update them where appropriate, and to take appropriate action. Additionally, based on the Tag’s commands, the system will either initiate follow-on communication or put the Tag to sleep. Mr. Julius Knapp November 30, 2005 Page 3 15.231a LF Transmitter LF Transmitter Tag Response Single Tag 15.209 Tag Response max 5 sec. Min 100 ms Signpost Wake Up Command UHF Reader puts Tag to Sleep mode 2) UHF Reader Wakeup Command Fixed Reader. The Wakeup command from a fixed UHF Reader is comprised of a continuous 31.25 kHz FSK modulated signal on a 433.92 MHz carrier for 4.8 seconds, followed by a silent period and a Hello command. The entire signal lasts for 4.9 seconds, which complies with the 5 second limit set forth in Section 15.231(a). A timing diagram is depicted below. A Tag that receives the Wakeup command responds by transmitting a control sign…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Internal Photos

File: R68608 Rev 1 Page 1 of 23 2016-01 Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to Industry Canada RSS-Gen Issue 2 / RSS 210 Issue 7 FCC Part 15 Subpart C on the Savi Technology, Inc. Transmitter Model: ST-602-14 UPN: 2404A-602T1 FCC ID: KL7-602T-V1 GRANTEE: Savi Technology, Inc. 351 E. Evelyn Ave. Mountain View, CA 94041 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Ave Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: July 17, 2007 FINAL TEST DATES: April 4, 2007 and July 11, 2007 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ David W. Bare Chief Technical Officer Elliott Laboratories, Inc. is accredited by the A2LA, certificate number 2016-01, to perform the test(s) listed in this report. This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: July 17, 2007 File: R68608 Rev 1 Page 2 of 23 pages REVISION HISTORY Revision # Date Comments Modified By 1 August 1, 2007 Initial Release David Guidotti Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: July 17, 2007 File: R68608 Rev 1 Page 3 of 23 pages TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE..................................................................................................................................................................................1 REVISION HISTORY.....................................................................................................................................................................2 TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................................................3 SCOPE...............................................................................................................................................................................................5 OBJECTIVE.....................................................................................................................................................................................6 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE................................................................................................................................................6 TEST RESULTS SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................7 MOMENTARILY OPERATED DEVICES – CONTROL SIGNALS.......................................................................................7 MOMENTARILY OPERATED DEVICES – DATA SIGNALS OR SIGNALS AT PREDETERMINED INTERVALS...8 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL BANDS............................................................................................8 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES...........................................................................................................................................9 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS..........................................................................................................................10 GENERAL....................................................................................................................................................................................10 OTHER EUT DETAILS.............................................................................................................................................................10 ANTENNA SYSTEM................................................................................................................................................................11 ENCLOSURE...............................................................................................................................................................................11 MODIFICATIONS.....................................................................................................................................................................11 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...........................................................................................................................................................11 EUT INTERFACE PORTS.........................................................................................................................................................11 EUT OPERATION......................................................................................................................................................................11 TEST SITE......................................................................................................................................................................................12 GENERAL INFORMATION.....................................................................................................................................................12 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................................12 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS.....................................................................................................................12 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION..................................................................................................................................13 RECEIVER SYSTEM..................................................................................................................................................................13 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER...............................................................................................................................13 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN)................................................................................................13 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS.....................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Radiated Emissions Test Configuration Photographs