O2Z-BT2Intel Personal Wireless Module

EXHIBIT C – User Manual FCC ID O2Z-BT2 Eligibility Requirements for Regulatory Module Approval Introduction The Intel Personal Wireless Module(Ambler) with Bluetooth wireless technology is a radio device that transmits and receives radio signals in accordance with the spectrum regulations for the 2.4-GHz unlicensed frequency range. Regulatory approval is required for each country throughout the world where the end-user wishes to operate the Intel Personal Wireless Module(Ambler) and communicate to other Bluetooth devices. As part of Intel’s solution for Bluetooth wireless technology in mobile PCs, Intel will provide regulatory approvals for certain countries in the form of a Modular Approval (MA)grant, which can be utilized by PC manufacturers. A modular grant allows the OEM to insert an approved device/antenna interconnection/antenna into a laptop without the need for additional regulatory equipment certification. In the case of laptops, where many models may exist, this form of certification can represent a significant savings in terms of cost and time. The countries that can accept this form of approval include the US, Canada, and certain European counties. The conditions for approval for each of these countries is described below. Obtaining Modular Approval is not a requirement. If an Intel customer uses a unique antenna or antenna interconnect design, that customer may file for standard type approval in the country or countries of interest. This method will require the testing of the entire end product, and hence may be more time consuming expensive. The MA is only valid in countries that have accepted the MA process. For countries that have not accepted the MA process, PC manufacturers must submit the laptop for a conventional radio transmitter type-approval for each country of interest. PC manufacturers may disregard the requirements of this section if they accept the full responsibility for regulatory type-approval of the electronic device with an integrated Intel Personal Wireless Module(Ambler). User Guide Information PC manufacturers are required to place specific text in the user’s guide for a notebook PC alongside other regulatory information. The information may be segmented by geographic world region if desired, but the exact text shown below must be maintained. The user’s guide must contain the following items: United States of America Requirements The following text must be copied exactly into the products user’s guide: Intel ® Ambler Module With Bluetooth* Wireless Technology Design Guide, Rev. 4.1 SC-3216 Intel Secret 2 R “This device complies with part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Caution: Caution: Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment.” General User Guide Requirements The following text must be copied exactly into the product’s user’s guide: “This product contains a radio transmitter with Bluetooth wireless technology which has been tested and found to be compliant with the applicable regulations governing a radio transmitter in the 2.400 GHz to 2.4835 GHz frequency range. The countries where this product is authorized for sale and use by the supplier are as follows: • United States of America • Canada • Belgium • Denmark • Germany • Italy • Netherlands • Spain • Sweden • United Kingdom US Germany UK France Canada Italy Netherlands Sweden Spain Belgium Denmark Finland • United States of America Intel ® Ambler Module With Bluetooth* Wireless Technology Design Guide, Rev. 4.1 SC-3216 Intel Secret 3 R • Canada • Belgium • Denmark • Germany • Italy • Netherlands • Spain • Sweden • United Kingdom • • This list will be updated in future revisions bases on the grants that Intel will obtain. Note: Japan has no form of modular approval available at this time. Regulatory certification for Japan can only be obtained through standard type approval procedures and you are responsible for obtaining that approval. Topics Not Covered Topics not covered in this manual include: • Details of requirements for standard equipment certification (type approval) filing (Neither US nor other countries) • Japan regulatory approvals • Unintentional emissions requirements for FCC or other countries United States Regulatory Approval FCC Modular Approval (MA) The requirements for FCC modular approval were released in June 2000 in the FCC’s Public Notice FCC Public Notice DA 00-1407, Part 15 Unlicensed Modular Transmitter Approval. General Conditions To fully comply with modular approval requirements the following conditions must be met. 1. Non- modification of the module or additions to circuitry 2. Adherence to the design criteria, including antennas and transmission line interconnect 3. Testing of the final configuration to insure emissions compliance Intel ® Ambler Module With Bluetooth* Wireless Technology Design Guide, Rev. 4.1 SC-3216 Intel Secret 4 R Design Criteria for Modular Approval The Intel Personal Wireless Module(Ambler) with Bluetooth wireless technology may not be altered or modified in any way upon receipt from Intel. Additionally, no external component can be added which changes the radio frequency (RF) characteristics of the transmitted signals. This includes all components both passive and active such as RF filters, RF amplifiers, RF switches, etc. RF components may not be placed between the output pin of the Intel Personal Wireless Module(Ambler) and the Intel enabled antennas except the RF transmission line that interconnects them. Antennas Only antennas bearing specific part numbers(refer to section 5) and qualified by Intel’s MA may be used with the Intel Personal Wireless Module(Ambler) with Bluetooth wireless technology. These antennas are designed to be …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

EXHIBIT A – Agent Authorization Letter FCC ID O2Z-BT2

EXHIBIT L – Cover Letter from Agent FCC ID O2Z-BT2 NORTHWEST EMC, INC. 22975 NW Evergreen Parkway, Suite 400 Hillsboro, OR 97124 February 14, 2001 Dear Application Examiner: On behalf of Intel Corporation, Northwest EMC, Inc is submitting this application for the certification of the Intel(R) Personal Wireless Module. It operates from 2402 – 2480 MHz (center frequency to center frequency), with a peak output power of 2.404 mW. It is a spread spectrum transmitter that utilizes frequency hopping techniques. This RF module is compliant with Bluetooth Power Class II specifications, and will be used only in personal computers (both in desktop and notebook platforms) as a mobile transmitter. The Bluetooth module can be configured with any one of four antennas. Data is supplied with this application in support of each antenna. The technical report and exhibits demonstrate compliance with FCC rules 47 CFR 15.247, Public Notice DA 00-705, and FCC 97-114. In addition, the EUT meets the requirements for modular approval as detailed in FCC Public Notice DA00-1407. Compliance to each of the modular approval requirements is described in Exhibit N, “Modular Approval Requirements.pdf”. To facilitate the review process, an index of exhibits has been provided (see file “Index of exhibits.pdf”). Your efforts in reviewing this application are greatly appreciated. Best regards, Greg Kiemel, Director of Engineering Northwest EMC, Inc.

Exhibits for the FCC application of the Intel(R) Personal Wireless Module Spread Spectrum Transmitter FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 Exhibit Description File Name Confidential Exhibit A Agent Authorization Letter Agent Authorization Letter.pdf Exhibit B Technical Report Technical Report.pdf Exhibit C User Manual User Manual.pdf Exhibit D FCC ID Label FCC ID Label.pdf Exhibit E External Photos External Photos.pdf Exhibit F Internal Photos Internal Photos.pdf Exhibit G Antenna Information Antenna Information.pdf YES Exhibit H Schematics Schematics.pdf YES Exhibit I Request for Confidentiality Letter Request for Confidentiality Letter.pdf Exhibit J Frequency Block Diagram Frequency Block Diagram.pdf YES Exhibit K Description of Frequency Hopping System Description of Frequency Hopping System.pdf Exhibit L Cover letter from Agent Cover letter from Agent.pdf Exhibit M Test Setup Photos Test Setup Photos.pdf Exhibit N Modular Approval Requirements Modular Approval Requirements.pdf Exhibit O Supplemental Emissions Test Report Supplemental Emissions Test Report.pdf Exhibit P FHSS Occupied Bandwidth FHSS Occupied Bandwidth.pdf Exhibit Q Channel Spacing Channel Spacing.pdf Exhibit R Band Edge Compliance Band Edge Compliance.pdf Exhibit S Dwell Time Dwell Time.pdf Exhibit T Conducted Spurious Emissions Conducted Spurious Emissions.pdf Exhibit U Number of Hopping Frequencies Number of Hopping Frequencies.pdf Exhibit V Output Power Output Power.pdf Exhibit W DSSS Occupied Bandwidth DSSS Occupied Bandwidth.pdf Exhibit X DSSS Power Spectral Density DSSS Power Spectral Density.pdf Exhibit Y Output Power vs. DC Input Output Power vs. DC Input.pdf Exhibit Z AC Powerline Conducted Emissions AC Powerline Conducted Emissions.pdf Exhibit AA Radiated Spurious Emissions Radiated Spurious Emissions.pdf Exhibit BB Processing Gain Processing Gain.pdf Exhibit CC Antenna Connection Method Antenna Connection Method.pdf YES

EXHIBIT N – Modular Approval Requirements FCC ID O2Z-BT2 NORTHWEST EMC, INC. 22975 NW Evergreen Parkway, Suite 400 Hillsboro, OR 97124 February 14, 2001 Dear Application Examiner: Intel’s Bluetooth Spread Spectrum Transmitter, FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 is seeking FCC authorization as a modular transmitter. The EUT meets the requirements for modular approval as detailed in FCC Public Notice DA00-1407. Compliance to each of the requirements is described below: 1. “The modular transmitter must have its own RF shielding.” The radio portion of the module is contained in its own RF shielding. The shielding is installed at the factory. Please see Exhibit E for photos of the shielding. 2. “The modular transmitter must have buffered modulation/data inputs.” The EUT has buffered data inputs to insure compliance with Part 15 requirements under conditions of excessive data rates or over- modulation. Please see Exhibit H for schematics of the module. 3. “The modular transmitter must have its own power supply regulation.” The EUT has its own power supply regulation to insure compliance with Part 15 requirements regardless of the quality or level of external DC supplying the module from the host unit. Please see Exhibit H for schematics and Exhibit Y for test data demonstrating compliance. 4. “The modular transmitter must comply with the antenna requirements of Section 15.203 and 15.204(c).” The EUT meets the FCC antenna requirements. Please see Exhibit B for the technical report, Exhibit E for photographs of the antennas, Exhibit G for antenna information, Exhibit AA for spurious radiated emissions test data, and Exhibit CC for antenna connection method. 5. “The modular transmitter must be tested in a stand-alone configuration.” The EUT was tested in a stand-alone configuration. Please see Exhibit B for the technical report and Exhibit M for the test setup photos. Please note that the EUT was also tested for AC Powerline Conducted Emissions (see Exhibit Z). 6. “The modular transmitter must be labeled with its own FCC ID number.” The EUT is labeled with its own FCC ID number. Please see Exhibit D for a drawing of the label and its location on the device. Since the FCC ID number will not be visible when the module is installed inside a host computer, there are instructions given to the OEM on how to apply the exterior label. Please see page 4 of the User Manual (page 5 of Exhibit C). 7. “The modular transmitter must comply with any specific rule or operating requirements applicable to the transmitter and the manufacturer must provide adequate instructions along with the module to explain any such requirements.” The EUT is compliant with all applicable FCC rules. Detail instructions for maintaining compliance are given in the User Manual (see Exhibit C) . 8. “The modular transmitter must comply with any applicable RF exposure requirements.” The EUT is compliant with all applicable RF exposure requirements. RF Exposure is addressed in Section 4.5 of the technical report (see Exhibit B). Please contact me if you have additional questions. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Best regards, Greg Kiemel, Director of Engineering Northwest EMC, Inc.

EXHIBIT I – Request for Confidentiality FCC ID O2Z-BT2

EXHIBIT E – External Photos FCC ID O2Z-BT2 Top of Module Bottom of Module

EXHIBIT D – FCC ID Label FCC ID O2Z-BT2 ® Page 1 INT RR8XPL TB000AA EYWWLLLMMM FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 for RTA # see manual EL INT EL RR8XPL TB000AA EYWWLLLMMM FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 for RTA # see manual EL 890XXX 56789 FCC ID: INT 1234567 P1234 O2Z-BT2 for RTA # see manual INT EL RR8XPL TB000AA EYWWLLLMMM FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 for RTA # see manual INTEL - Arial 14pt font, all capitals Pin 1 Marking ~ 1mm diameter Product Code, Lot Number, FCC Code - Arial 5 pt font, all capitals CE marking - gif, ~ 2mm square RTA # info - Arial 2 pt font, mostly lower case On-Module Marking - Schematic SHOWN ACTUAL SIZE

EXHIBIT F – Internal Photos FCC ID O2Z-BT2 Top of Module Bottom of Module

EXHIBIT K – Description of Frequency Hopping System FCC ID O2Z-BT2 The Equipment Under Test (EUT) is the Intel  Personal Wireless Module, a spread spectrum transmitter that uses frequency hopping modulation. This device is intended to be sold to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) for integration into laptop computers. This device will be integrated with one of five Intel sponsored antennas which are being recommended to be used with this device. The module will allow laptop computers to communicate with other consumer electronics containing Bluetooth  devices. This will allow a laptop computer to communicate to and share files and data with other devices such as digital cameras, cellular phones, wireless mice, wireless joysticks, wireless keyboards, etc. Within the Bluetooth  protocol, frequency hopping is governed by one and only one Bluetooth  unit in any given communications group. The master unit determines the pseudo random hopping sequence and conveys this information to other “slave” units that are in the communications group with the master. Because the master unit generates the hopping sequence independently without any external information, there is no coordination with other FHSS systems. The Bluetooth  protocol relies on Forward Error Correction (FEC) along with re- transmissions to accommodate for multiple transmitters and interference on specific frequencies. Under two specific modes (page mode and inquiry mode) of the Bluetooth  protocol, fewer than 75 hopping frequencies are used for a very short period of time. These two modes are used to search for and acquire new devices in the surrounding area. The amount of time that a Bluetooth  device spends in these two modes represents a very small portion of the overall communications time. The data transmitted during these two modes is Direct Sequence modulated. Even though the transmitter is still hopping to a pseudo-random hopping sequence (less than 75 frequencies), the data transmitted at each frequency is Direct Sequence modulated. In this regard, the transceiver qualifies as a Hybrid System under the Part 15.247 rules. Because the Bluetooth  protocol contains these modes, and because these modes do not meet the minimum number of hopping channels specified in Part 15.247, the Bluetooth  transmitter is categorized as a Hybrid system for these two modes and the hybrid-mode processing gain calculations apply. Because the Bluetooth protocol contains these modes, and because these modes do not meet the minimum number of hopping channels specified in Part 15.247 for frequency hopping, the Bluetooth ? transmitter is categorized as a hybrid system for these two modes and the hybrid- mode processing gain calculations apply. Frequency Bands and Channel Arrangement29 November 199919 BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION Version 1.0 Bpage 19 of 1082 Radio Specification 2 FREQUENCY BANDS AND CHANNEL ARRANGEMENT The Bluetooth system is operating in the 2.4 GHz ISM (Industrial Scientific Medicine) band. In a vast majority of countries around the world the range of this frequency band is 2400 - 2483.5 MHz. Some countries have however national limitations in the frequency range. In order to comply with these national limitations, special frequency hopping algorithms have been specified for these countries. It should be noted that products implementing the reduced frequency band will not work with products implementing the full band. The products implementing the reduced frequency band must therefore be consid- ered as local versions for a single market. The Bluetooth SIG has launched a campaign to overcome these difficulties and reach total harmonization of the frequency band. Channel spacing is 1 MHz. In order to comply with out-of-band regulations in each country, a guard band is used at the lower and upper band edge. GeographyRegulatory RangeRF Channels USA, Europe and most other countries 1) Note 1. Japan, the MPT announced at the beginning of October 1999 that the Japanese frequency band would be extended to 2400-2483.5 MHz, effective immediately. Testing of devices by TELEC may however need some time to change. The previ- ously specified special frequency-hopping algorithm covering 2471-2497 MHz remains as an option. 2.400-2.4835 GHzf=2402+k MHz, k=0,...,78 Spain 2) Note 2. There is a proposal in Spain to extend the national frequency band to 2403- 2483.5 MHz. The Bluetooth SIG has approached the authorities in Spain to get a full harmonization. The outcome is expected by the beginning of year 2000. 2.445-2.475 GHzf=2449+k MHz, k=0,...,22 France 3) Note 3. The Bluetooth SIG has established good contacts with the French authorities and are closely following the development of harmonization. 2.4465-2.4835 GHzf=2454+k MHz, k=0,...,22 Table 2.1: Operating frequency bands GeographyLower Guard BandUpper Guard Band USA2 MHz3.5 MHz Europe (except Spain and France)2 MHz3.5 MHz Spain4 MHz26 MHz France7.5 MHz7.5 MHz Japan2 MHz2 MHz Table 2.2: Guard Bands Physical Channel29 November 199943 BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION Version 1.0 Bpage 43 of 1082 Baseband Specification 2 PHYSICAL CHANNEL 2.1 FREQUENCY BAND AND RF CHANNELS Bluetooth operates in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. Although globally available, the exact location and the width of the band may differ by country. In the US and Europe, a band of 83.5 MHz width is available; in this band, 79 RF channels spaced 1 MHz apart are defined. In Japan, Spain, and France, a smaller band is available; in this band, 23 RF channels spaced 1 MHz apart are defined. 2.2 CHANNEL DEFINITION The channel is represented by a pseudo-random hopping sequence hopping through the 79 or 23 RF channels. The hopping sequence is unique for the piconet and is determined by the Bluetooth device address of the master; the phase in the hopping sequence is determined by the Bluetooth clock of the master. The channel is divided into time slots where each slot corresponds to an RF hop frequency. Consecutive hops correspond to different RF h…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

EXHIBIT B – Technical Report FCC ID O2Z-BT2 Measurement/Technical Report Intel Corporation Intel(R) Personal Wireless Module FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 February 14, 2001 This report concerns (check one): Original Grant X Class II Change____ Equipment Type: Unlicensed Spread Spectrum Transmitter Module Rule Part: 47 CFR 15.247 Deferred grant requested per 47 CFR 0.457 (d)(1)(ii)? Yes_____ no__X__ If yes, defer until: ______N/A______ date Intel Corp. agrees to notify the Commission by: ______N/A______ date of the intended date of announcement of the product so that the grant can be issued on that date. Transition Rules Request per 15.37: yes_____ no__X__ If no, assumed Part 15, Subpart C for intentional radiators – new 47 CFR [10-1-92] provision. Report prepared by: Northwest EMC, Inc. 22975 NW Evergreen Pkwy., Ste 400 Hillsboro, OR 97124 (503) 844-4066 fax: (503) 844-3826 Report No. INSC0011 FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 Northwest EMC, Inc. Report No. INSC0011 Page 2 Table of Contents Section Description Page 1.0 General Information 3 1.1 Product Description 3 1.2 Related Submittals/Grants 5 1.3 Tested System Details 5 1.4 Test Methodology 6 1.5 Test Facility 6 3.0 System Test Configuration 7 3.1 Justification 7 3.2 EUT Exercise Software 7 3.3 Special Accessories 7 3.4 Equipment Modifications 7 Figure 3.1 Configuration of Tested System 8 4.0 Antenna Requirement 9 4.1 Antenna Information 9 4.2 Frequency Hopping System 9 4.3 Frequency Hopping Receiver 9 4.4 DeFacto EIRP Limit 10 4.5 RF Exposure Compliance Requirements 10 4.6 AC Powerline Conducted Emissions 11 4.7 Spurious Radiated Emissions Data 12 4.8 Occupied Bandwidth 13 4.9 Peak Output Power 14 5.0 Spurious RF Conducted Emissions 15 5.1 Band Edge Compliance of RF Conducted Emissions 16 5.2 Carrier Frequency Separation 17 5.3 Time of Occupancy (Dwell Time) 18 5.4 Number of Hopping Frequencies 19 5.5 Power Spectral Density 20 5.6 Processing Gain 21 5.7 Field Strength Calculations 22 5.8 Measurement Bandwidths 22 6.0 Measurement Equipment 23 FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 Northwest EMC, Inc. Report No. INSC0011 Page 3 1.0 General Information 1.1 Product Description Manufactured By...............................................................................................Intel Corporation Address...............................................2200 Missions College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95052-8119 Test Requested By:....................................................................................................Al Bettner Model...................................................................................Intel(R) Personal Wireless Module FCC ID........................................................................................................................O2Z-BT2 Serial Number(s).....................................................................................new module #2 1/15/01 Date of Test..............................................................January 12, 2001 through February 14, 2001 Job Number...............................................................................................................INSC0011 Prepared By: Vicki Albertson, Technical Report and Documentation Manager Technical Review By: Approved By: Greg Kiemel, Director of Engineering Don Facteau, IS Manager FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 Northwest EMC, Inc. Report No. INSC0011 Page 4 1.1 Product Description con’t The Equipment Under Test (EUT) is the Intel  Personal Wireless Module, a spread spectrum transmitter that uses frequency hopping modulation. This device is intended to be sold to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) for integration into laptop computers only. This device will be integrated with one of four Intel sponsored antennas, which are being recommended to be used with this device. The module will allow laptop computers to communicate with other consumer electronics containing Bluetooth  devices. This will allow a laptop computer to communicate to and share files and data with other devices such as digital cameras, cellular phones, wireless mice, wireless joysticks, wireless keyboards, etc. Within the Bluetooth  protocol, frequency hopping is governed by one and only one Bluetooth  unit in any given communications group. The master unit determines the pseudo random hopping sequence and conveys this information to other “slave” units that are in the communications group with the master. Because the master unit generates the hopping sequence independently without any external information, there is no coordination with other FHSS systems. The Bluetooth  protocol relies on Forward Error Correction (FEC) along with re-transmissions to accommodate for multiple transmitters and interference on specific frequencies. Under two specific modes (page mode and inquiry mode) of the Bluetooth  protocol, fewer than 75 hopping frequencies are used for a very short period of time. These two modes are used to search for and acquire new devices in the surrounding area. The amount of time that a Bluetooth  device spends in these two modes represents a very small portion of the overall communications time. The data transmitted during these two modes is Direct Sequence modulated. Even though the transmitter is still hopping to a pseudo-random hopping sequence (less than 75 frequencies), the data transmitted at each frequency is Direct Sequence modulated. In this regard, the transceiver qualifies as a Hybrid System under the Part 15.247 rules. Because the Bluetooth  protocol contains these modes, and because these modes do not meet the minimum number of hopping channels specified in Part 15.247 for frequency hopping, the Bluetooth  transmitter is categorized as a hybrid system for these two modes and the hybrid-mode processing gain calculations apply. FCC ID: O2Z-BT2 Northwest EMC, Inc. Report No. INSC0011 Page 5 1.2 Related Submittals/Grants None 1.3 Tested System Details EUT and Peripherals Item FCC ID Description and Serial No. EUT O2Z-BT2 Intel(R) Personal Wireless Module Spread Spectrum T…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

EXHIBIT O – Supplemental Emissions Test Report FCC ID O2Z-BT2 A. Bettner 2/15/01 Modular Approval Emissions Tests Taken at NW EMC January, 2001 The purpose of these tests is to conduct similar tests to those requested by the FCC for Intel’s modular approval grant (OZ-BT1, November 2000) on a similar Bluetooth module. As in the previous request by the FCC for emissions data (Refer to Exhibit OO of grant OZ-BT1), a subset consisting of three sets of data were taken (see Appendix A for a description of the original complete set of tests): 1) Measurement of emissions from the highest gain antenna connected directly to the module (with minimal transmission line (highest output power)) 2) Measurement of emissions from the module connected to a straight microstrip (resonant length) between the module and the antenna. 3) Measurement of emissions from the same configuration as 2), only with a 50 ohm shielded load in place of the antenna. 4) Measurement of emissions from the module connected to a meandered microstrip (resonant length) plus coax (resonant length) connected to the highest gain antenna Test 1) establishes the “worst case” emissions test since the highest gain antenna is being used and the length of transmission line (loss) is minimized. Test 2) demonstrates whether the spurious emissions are increased by the addition of resonant section of open microstrip transmission line. Test 3) (with 50 ohm shielded termination) demonstrates whether the transmission line itself is radiating. Test 4) is a “worst case” emissions test based on a combination of both an open meandered line of resonant length and a piece of coax of resonant length. Resonant lengths of open transmission line and cable were computed using the equations found in Appendix B, attached. Test results: Test results for each of the configurations described above may be found in Appendix C. No detectable emissions from the radio were found at any frequencies below 2400 MHz or above 7500 MHz. Configuration 1) produced the highest level of radiated emissions: at 7320 MHz the peak level was 2.5dB below the 74 dBuV/m peak limit, the highest average level was also at 7320 MHz with a margin of 6.9 dB below the 54 dBuV/m average limit. Configuration 1) is the worst case condition because it transmits the highest power (shortest coax, highest gain antenna). No other configuration, including an open transmission line produced a condition exceeding these levels. While scanning, emissions from the EUT were maximized by rotating the EUT, adjusting the measurement antenna height and polarization, and manipulating the EUT and transmission line/antenna configuration in 3 orthogonal planes (per ANSI C63.4:1992). A preamp and high pass filter were use for this test in order to provide sufficient measurement sensitivity. A. Bettner 2/15/01 Appendix A. Original Proposed Tests (From previous MA filing OZ2-BT1) 1. To demonstrate that the microstrip transmission line radiates only minimally, Intel will perform and record a scan test on the module with an antenna connected and with the antenna disconnected. When the antenna is disconnected, the transmission line will be terminated with a shielded 50 ohm SMA termination. The length of microstrip transmission line is to be an integer fraction of the center frequency, 2440 MHz. Any one of the four antennas to be used with the module may be used for this test. 2. To demonstrate that a coaxial cable connected to the microstrip transmission line radiates only minimally, Intel will perform and record a scan test on the module with and without the cable connected to the transmission line. Any one of the four antennas can be used with the module. The length of the coaxial cable is to be an integer fraction of the center frequency, 2440 MHz. 3. For the following tests, the same length of microstrip transmission line as in (1) (i.e. an integer fraction of the center frequency, 2440 MHz) shall be used, connected on one end to the transmission line and on the other end to one of the antennas to be used with the module. The following tests shall be performed and recorded: (a) a minimum dimension (W and H) 50 ohm transmission line will be tested in a straight line and a meandered line (two 45 degree angle turns) configuration; Intel estimates that the minimum dimension line trace will be approximately 7 mil by 4.4 mil; (b) a maximum dimension (W and H) 50 ohm transmission line will be tested in a straight line and a meandered line (at least two 45 degree angle turns) configuration; Intel estimates that the maximum dimension line trace will be approximately 115 mi…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.