FCCID.CO- FCC ID Database
HomeCompaniesEquipment ClassesSearch

ยฉ 2026 FCC ID Database. All rights reserved.

AboutContactData sourced from FCC public records
  1. Home/
  2. CIDMATE International Technology Inc./
  3. PIZMH9011

PIZMH9011900MHz Analog Cordless Phone

CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
900MHz Analog Cordless Phone - FCC ID PIZMH9011 - CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
Click to zoom

Application Details

Equipment Class
DXT - Part 15 Low Power Transceiver, Rx Verified
Date of Grant
Apr 04, 2001
Application Purpose
Original Equipment
Date of Application
Apr 03, 2001
Equipment Note
900MHz Analog Cordless Phone
Frequency Range
925.37500000 - 927.32500000
Company
CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
Country
Taiwan

Documents & Files

Select a file to view

Users Manual

โ†—

Attestation Statements

โ†—

Block Diagram

โ†—
โ†—

Cover Letter(s)

โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—

External Photos

โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—

ID Label/Location Info

โ†—
โ†—
โ†—

Internal Photos

โ†—
โ†—

Operational Description

โ†—

Schematics

โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—

Test Report

โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—

Test Setup Photos

โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—
โ†—

Document Text

Text extracted from the exhibit documents filed with the FCC. Open a document above to read the original.

Attestation Statements

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 April 3, 2001 RE: FCC ID: PIZMH9011 Dear Mr. Chen, I have the following comments on this application: 1.) The label does not contain the full FCC ID. It would be helpful to supply a line drawing of just the label with the complete FCC ID: as it will appear on the device. 2.) There is nothing in the reported measurements or test description to indicate radiated measurements were made through the required frequency range specified in 15.33(a). 3.) Please advise your client that a Part 68 application must be filed pursuant to 15.214(b). It would also be prudent to observe the other provisions of 15.214(c) and (d). In general, the label statement could easily appear in the manual, or as a supplement to the device when shipped, while the security provisions could be added as a separate document to the Operational Description Everything else looks in order. I await your response. William H. Graff Examining Engineer President and Director of Engineering mailto:[email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Cover Letter(s)

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 April 3, 2001 RE: FCC ID: PIZMH9011 Dear Mr. Chen, I have the following comments on this application: 1.) The label does not contain the full FCC ID. It would be helpful to supply a line drawing of just the label with the complete FCC ID: as it will appear on the device. 2.) There is nothing in the reported measurements or test description to indicate radiated measurements were made through the required frequency range specified in 15.33(a). 3.) Please advise your client that a Part 68 application must be filed pursuant to 15.214(b). It would also be prudent to observe the other provisions of 15.214(c) and (d). In general, the label statement could easily appear in the manual, or as a supplement to the device when shipped, while the security provisions could be added as a separate document to the Operational Description Everything else looks in order. I await your response. William H. Graff Examining Engineer President and Director of Engineering mailto:[email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Cover Letter(s)

Dear Timothy, As per the requirement from FCC, please see the response below: 1. The frequency range for Base is 902.675 to 904.625MHz. for handset is 925.375 to 927.325. 2. Yes, the handset was tested in 3 orthogonal planes. And only worst case is presented at the report. (Also the photos shows the condition for worst case, too.) 3. After checking the test set-up photo, we did not see the condition you mentioned. Would you please check that for us again? Or we have to provide the photo to you again? 4. We also provide the RF board schematic at file attached for your reference. Please review it. Would these response be ok? If need more info, please let me know. Thank you. Have a nice day & Best Regards, Julia/ Intertek Taiwan To: "'Timothy R. Johnson'" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: FCC Equipment Authorization System (FCC ID: PIZMH9011) Page 1 of 1In 3/29/2004Printed for "Timothy R. Johnson" <[email protected]>

Cover Letter(s)

Dear Timothy, Sorry I missed that. I have checked the test data for this project, and found we did test both peak and average of radiated measurement data over 1000 MHz for the EUT. But I did not show the average test data on the report because we have so limited experience on such devices that we did not know both (peak and average) needs to be on the report. I have the test data added on the report and have it attached for your review. If you have question, please feel free to let me know. Thanks for all your kindly help. Have a nice day & Best Regards, Julia/ Intertek Taiwan >From: Timothy R. Johnson [mailto:[email protected] ><mailto:[email protected] > ] >Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 11:07 AM ...snip... >alternate email: [email protected] >direct number: 404-414-8071 >corporate phone: 703-847-4700 >corporate fax: 703-847-6888 PIZMH9012 -revised.pdf PIZMH9011 -revised.pdf From: "Julia Chu EMC-TPE" <[email protected]> To: "'Timothy R. Johnson'" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: FCC ID: PIZMH9011 & PIZMH9012 (radiated data over 1GHz) Page 1 of 1 4/24/2004Printed for "Timothy R. Johnson" <[email protected]>

External Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9012

External Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9012

External Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9012

External Photos

        

External Photos

           

External Photos

       

External Photos

       

External Photos

       

External Photos

       

Internal Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9011 FCC ID: PIZMH9011 FCC ID: PIZMH9011 FCC ID: PIZMH9011 FCC ID: PIZMH9011 FCC ID: PIZMH9011 FCC ID: PIZMH9011 FCC ID: PIZMH9011

Internal Photos

                                                                                   

Test Report

                                                !" #$   $% & !'  % ( ) % *+% & "   ,- #  ** % $%# & !'                                                  !  "    #                          $  $$%   & $      '& $!    '& $&( )  *  #  + $ +  ,-    . #    +  )  /  #   0##$*1/2 $3     2 #  2 #    .4" 50##$*1/6  &-  0##$*&64#5$ &$3     $ & 7  $ &-  .48  50##$*&6$ &$0  78    .$ &&-  .4" 50##$*&6$+ &&$0  78    .$+ &*% -  .48  50##$*16$6 &*$% -  .$6 &+% -  .4" 50##$*16$ &+$% -  .$ &/-    0##$*&64#5                     *#.. / %%          -  -    "  $*&64545 #   #     !#(  $*1/#   -  $*&64 5$*16 #     $%89$*&645 #                         !  "  #                      0 /.  1 "/ /  2  ,   :#.,!         (  :" 611,89# (  , ; :61$$ 0##.:(<,861$$ 0) -  :61,89 62,89 # ; :&1     ,   :0, (  :$1= +189 6=   .#:# $1->?$$   @$  -  :> $/11$ .45:> 611$ 0/11$ 3 % %%.   2  '" 611,89# (    '       -)          0## ($* #( $*&6  ?      0      ,                      4 5% 6#. $   "  (  ;  :*1?11$6?1/ ; :6&6&2 ,    :     (  ;  :!#?2$& ; :661&1111++ ,    : 9 8   (  ;  : ,?$1$ ; :;A! ,    :!;.B;#                  โ€ฆ

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Test Report

                                             !   "   #       "  "  $%   &'() *&'()  "   +(),&-    .  /    "  "  $%  *&'() &&&'()   "  &+() $% " 0()  "   '(),&     .            **,.   1     $% 11 &2  11"1    **,.3 "1        /       *           1                             4       

Test Report

Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO FCC ID.: PIZMH9011 Report No.: EME-010047 Page 13 of 23 4.3 Radiated Emission Test Data (Handset unit) FCC 15.249 Worst Case Radiated Emission at Low Channel, 1849.74 MHz, margin: -5.03 dB 4.3.1 Fundamental & Harmonics Emission Data EUT : 9011 (Handset unit) Testing Mode TestinMoMoModel : Transmitter (Low Channel) Freq. (MHz) Spec. Analyz Detector Antenna Polariz. (H/V) Reading (dBuV) Antenna Factor (dB/m) Cable Loss (dB) Corrected Reading (dBuV/m) Limit At 3m (dBuV/m) Margin (dB) 1849.74 PK H 27.53 26.4 2.2 56.13 74 -17.87 1849.74 AV H 19.24 26.4 2.2 47.84 54 -6.16 2774.58 PK H 20.18 29.5 2.64 52.32 74 -21.68 2774.58 AV H 12.82 29.5 2.64 44.96 54 -9.04 1849.74 PK V 30.62 26.4 2.2 59.22 74 -14.78 1849.74 AV V 20.37 26.4 2.2 48.97 54 -5.03 2774.58 PK V 22.51 29.5 2.64 54.65 74 -19.35 2774.58 AV V 13.24 29.5 2.64 45.38 54 -8.62 Remark: 1. Corrected Level = Reading Level + Antenna Factor + Cable Loss 2. Uncertainty was calculated in accordance with NAMAS NIS 81. In the General Radiated Emission Test, the uncertainty is within ยฑ2.5dB 3. All Readings below 1GHz are Quasi-Peak, above are average value PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.pdffactory.com Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO FCC ID.: PIZMH9011 Report No.: EME-010047 Page 14 of 23 EUT : 9011 (Handset unit) Testing Mode TestinMoMoModel : Transmitter (Middle Channel) Freq. (MHz) Spec. Analyz Detector Antenna Polariz. (H/V) Reading (dBuV) Antenna Factor (dB/m) Cable Loss (dB) Corrected Reading (dBuV/m) Limit At 3m (dBuV/m) Margin (dB) 1852.55 PK H 27.85 26.4 2.2 56.45 74 -17.55 1852.55 AV H 18.34 26.4 2.2 46.94 54 -7.06 2778.87 PK H 21.69 29.5 2.64 53.83 74 -20.17 2778.87 AV H 12.34 29.5 2.64 44.48 54 -9.52 1852.55 PK V 25.41 26.4 2.2 54.01 74 -19.99 1852.55 AV V 17.33 26.4 2.2 45.93 54 -8.07 2778.87 PK V 21.32 29.5 2.64 53.46 74 -20.54 2778.87 AV V 11.45 29.5 2.64 43.59 54 -10.41 Remark: 1. Corrected Level = Reading Level + Antenna Factor + Cable Loss 2. Uncertainty was calculated in accordance with NAMAS NIS 81. In the General Radiated Emission Test, the uncertainty is within ยฑ2.5dB 3. All Readings below 1GHz are Quasi-Peak, above are average value PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.pdffactory.com Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO FCC ID.: PIZMH9011 Report No.: EME-010047 Page 15 of 23 EUT : 9011 (Handset unit) Testing Mode TestinMoMoModel : Transmitter (High Channel) Freq. (MHz) Spec. Analyz Detector Antenna Polariz. (H/V) Reading (dBuV) Antenna Factor (dB/m) Cable Loss (dB) Corrected Reading (dBuV/m) Limit At 3m (dBuV/m) Margin (dB) 1855.11 PK H 27.05 26.4 2.2 55.65 74 -18.35 1855.11 AV H 17.34 26.4 2.2 45.94 54 -8.06 2782.638 PK H 21.98 29.5 2.64 54.12 74 -19.88 2782.638 AV H 12.34 29.5 2.64 44.48 54 -9.52 1855.11 PK V 25.71 26.4 2.2 54.31 74 -19.69 1855.11 AV V 16.67 26.4 2.2 45.27 54 -8.73 2782.638 PK V 21.14 29.5 2.64 53.28 74 -20.72 2782.638 AV V 11.28 29.5 2.64 43.42 54 -10.58 Remark: 1. Corrected Level = Reading Level + Antenna Factor + Cable Loss 2. Uncertainty was calculated in accordance with NAMAS NIS 81. In the General Radiated Emission Test, the uncertainty is within ยฑ2.5dB 3. All Readings below 1GHz are Quasi-Peak, above are average value PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.pdffactory.com Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO FCC ID.: PIZMH9011 Report No.: EME-010047 Page 16 of 23 4.4 Radiated Emission Test Data (Base unit) FCC 15.249 Worst Case Radiated Emission at High Channel, 1810.18 MHz, margin: -9.52 dB 4.4.1 Fundamental & Harmonics Emission Data EUT : 9011 (Base unit) Testing Mode TestinMoMoModel : Transmitter (Low Channel) Freq. (MHz) Spec. Analyz Detector Antenna Polariz. (H/V) Reading (dBuV) Antenna Factor (dB/m) Cable Loss (dB) Corrected Reading (dBuV/m) Limit At 3m (dBuV/m) Margin (dB) 1805.104 PK H 24.1 26.4 2.2 52.7 74 -21.3 1805.104 AV H 13.21 26.4 2.2 41.81 54 -12.19 2707.656 PK H 19.2 29.5 3.14 51.84 74 -22.16 2707.656 AV H 8.21 29.5 3.14 40.85 54 -13.15 1805.104 PK V 21.53 26.4 2.2 50.13 74 -23.87 1805.104 AV V 12.34 26.4 2.2 40.94 54 -13.06 2707.656 PK V 18.35 29.5 3.14 50.99 74 -23.01 2707.656 AV V 7.34 29.5 3.14 39.98 54 -14.02 Remark: 1. Corrected Level = Reading Level + Antenna Factor + Cable Loss 2. Uncertainty was calculated in accordance with NAMAS NIS 81. In the General Radiated Emission Test, the uncertainty is within ยฑ2.5dB 3. All Readings below 1GHz are Quasi-Peak, above are average value PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.pdffactory.com Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO FCC ID.: PIZMH9011 Report No.: EME-010047 Page 17 of 23 EUT : 9011 (Base unit) Testing Mode TestinMoMoModel : Transmitter (Middle Channel) Freq. (MHz) Spec. Analyz Detector Antenna Polariz. (H/V) Reading (dBuV) Antenna Factor (dB/m) Cable Loss (dB) Corrected Reading (dBuV/m) Limit At 3m (dBuV/m) Margin (dB) 1807.5 PK H 22.18 26.4 2.2 50.78 74 -23.22 1807.5 AV H 13.46 26.4 2.2 42.06 54 -11.94 2711.25 PK H 19.25 29.5 3.14 51.89 74 -22.11 2711.25 AV H 8.24 29.5 3.14 40.88 54 -13.12 1807.5 PK V 25.37 26.4 2.2 53.97 74 -20.03 1807.5 AV V 14.67 26.4 2.2 43.27 54 -10.73 2711.25 PK V 18.61 29.5 3.14 51.25 74 -22.75 2711.25 AV V 7.94 29.5 3.14 40.58 54 -13.42 Remark: 1. Corrected Level = Reading Level + Antenna Factor + Cable Loss 2. Uncertainty was calculated in accordance with NAMAS NIS 81. In the General Radiated Emission Test, the uncertainty is within ยฑ2.5dB 3. All Readings below 1GHz are Quasi-Peak, above are average value PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.pdffactory.com Intertek Testing Services ETL SEMKO FCC ID.: PIZMH9011 Report No.: EME-010047 Page 18 of 23 EUT : 9011 (Base unit) Testing Mode TestinMoMoModel : Transmitter (High Channel) Freq. (MHz) Spec. Analyz Detector Antenna Polariz. (H/V) Reading (dBuV) Antenna Factor (dB/m) Cable Loss (dB) Corrected Reading (dBuV/m) Limit At 3m (dBuV/m) Margin (dB) 1810.178 PK H 25.12 26.4โ€ฆ

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Test Setup Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9012

Test Setup Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9012

Test Setup Photos

           

Test Setup Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9012

Test Setup Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9012

Test Setup Photos

           

Test Setup Photos

           

Test Setup Photos

FCC ID: PIZMH9011

Contact Information

Applicant

Beryl Liu(Sales Asst. Manager)
[email protected]886-2-2521-8658Fax: 886-2-2561-6624

Technical Contact

Intertek Testing Service Taiwan Ltd.JT Chen
[email protected]886 3 519 1411

No. 11, Ko-Tze-Nan, Chia-Tung Li ยท Hsinchu ยท Taiwan

Test Firm

Intertek Testing Services Taiwan Ltd.Alpha Liu
[email protected]886-3-519-1411Fax: 886-3-519-1410

Technical Specifications

#Rule PartsFrequency RangePower Output
215C925.375 MHz - 927.325 MHz-

Other Applications from CIDMATE International Technology Inc.

2.4 GHz Analog Cordless Phone with CID and DAM - FCC ID PIZGH9492 - CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
PIZGH9492

2.4 GHz Analog Cordless Phone with CID and DAM

Mar 28, 2004

Equipment Class

DXX - Part 15 Low Power Communication Device Transmitter
2.4GHz DSST Multi-Handset w/ CID+DAM - FCC ID PIZGH9764 - CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
PIZGH9764

2.4GHz DSST Multi-Handset w/ CID+DAM

Mar 24, 2004

Equipment Class

DTS - Digital Transmission System
2.4GHz ANALOG CORDLESS PHONE - FCC ID PIZXG34001 - CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
PIZXG34001

2.4GHz ANALOG CORDLESS PHONE

Aug 17, 2003

Equipment Class

DXX - Part 15 Low Power Communication Device Transmitter
2.4 GHz Analog Cordless Telephone with CID - FCC ID PIZMINI1 - CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
PIZMINI1

2.4 GHz Analog Cordless Telephone with CID

Jul 24, 2003

Equipment Class

DXX - Part 15 Low Power Communication Device Transmitter
2.4GHz ANALOG CORDLESS PHONE - FCC ID PIZXG32010 - CIDMATE International Technology Inc.
PIZXG32010

2.4GHz ANALOG CORDLESS PHONE

Jul 09, 2003

Equipment Class

DXX - Part 15 Low Power Communication Device Transmitter