PY306100029NETGEAR RangeMaxTM 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WP

202-10175-01 March 2006 NETGEAR, Inc. 4500 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA NETGEAR RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 User Manual ii v1.0, March 2006 Technical Support For customer support see http://kbserver.netgear.com/kb_web_files/n10005.asp NETGEAR, INC. Support Information Phone: 1-888-NETGEAR, for US & Canada only. For other countries, see your support information card. E-mail: [email protected] North American NETGEAR Web site: http://www.netgear.com Statement of Conditions In the interest of improving internal design, operational function, and/or reliability, NETGEAR reserves the right to make changes to the products described in this document without notice. NETGEAR does not assume any liability that may occur due to the use or application of the product(s) or circuit layout(s) described herein. © 2006 NETGEAR, Inc. NETGEAR, the NETGEAR logo, The Gear Guy and Everybody's Connecting are trademarks or registered trademarks of NETGEAR, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Other brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Information is subject to change without notice. All rights reserved . Maximum Wireless Signal Rate Derived from IEEE Standard 802.11 Specifications Actual data throughput will vary. Network conditions and environmental factors, including volume of network traffic, building materials and construction, and network overhead, lower actual data throughput rate. Safety and Regulatory Notices FCC Statement The WPNT121 has been tested and complies with the specifications for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used according to the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which is found by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: •Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna •Increase the separation between the equipment or devices •Connect the equipment to an outlet other than the receiver’s v1.0, March 2006 iii •Consult a dealer or an experienced radio/TV technician for assistance FCC Caution: Any change or modification to the product not expressly approved by Netgear could void the user’s authority to operate the device. This Transmitter must not be co-located or operating in conjunction with any other antenna or transmitter. FCC RF Radiation Exposure and SAR Statements SAR Statement The Netgear WPNT121 has been tested for body-worn Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) compliance. The FCC has established detailed SAR requirements and has established that these requirements have been met while installed in host notebook computer. RF Exposure Information The radio module has been evaluated under FCC Bulletin OET 65C (01-01) and found to be compliant to the requirements as set forth in CFR 47 Sections, 2.1093, and 15.247 (b) (4) addressing RF Exposure from radio frequency devices. This model meets the applicable government requirements for exposure to radio frequency waves. The highest SAR level measured for this device was 0.442w/kg. Canadian Department of Communications Industry Canada (IC) Notice This Class B digital apparatus complies with Canadian ICES-003 and RSS-210. Cet appareil numérique de la classe B est conforme à la norme NMB-003 et CNR-210 du Canada. “To prevent radio interference to the licensed service, this device is intended to be operated indoors and away from windows to provide maximum shielding. Equipment (or its transmit antenna) that is installed outdoors is subject to licensing.” “Pour empêcher que cet appareil cause du brouillage au service faisant l’objet d’une licence, il doit être utilisé à l’intérieur et devrait être placé loin des fenêtres afin de fournir un écran de blindage maximal. Si le matériel (ou son antenne d’émission) est installé à l’extérieur, il doit faire l’objet d’une licence.” Europe - EU Declaration of Conformity A printed copy of the EU Declaration of Conformity certificate for this product is provided in the WPNT121 product package. Èesky [Czech] NETGEAR, Inc. tímto prohlašuje, že tento NETGEAR RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 je ve shodì se základními požadavky a dalšími pøíslušnými ustanoveními smìrnice 1999/5/ES. Dansk [Danish] Undertegnede NETGEAR, Inc. erklærer herved, at følgende udstyr NETGEAR RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 overholder de væsentlige krav og øvrige relevante krav i direktiv 1999/5/EF. Deutsch [German] Hiermit erklärt NETGEAR, Inc., dass sich das Gerät NETGEAR RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 in Übereinstimmung mit den grundlegenden Anforderungen und den übrigen einschlägigen Bestimmungen der Richtlinie 1999/5/EG befindet. v1.0, March 2006 iv Eesti [Estonian] Käesolevaga kinnitab NETGEAR, Inc. seadme NETGEAR RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 vastavust direktiivi 1999/5/EÜ põhinõuetele ja nimetatud direktiivist tulenevatele teistele asjakohastele sätetele. EnglishHereby, NETGEAR, Inc., declares that this NETGEAR RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 is in compliance with the essential requirements and other relevant provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC. Español [Spanish] Por medio de la presen…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

NETGEAR, Inc. 4500 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, U.S.A. Date: Compliance Certification Services Certification Division 561F Monterey Road Morgan Hill, CA 95037 To whom it may concern: We, the undersigned, hereby authorize the Taiwan office of Compliance Engineering Services, Inc., d.b.a. Compliance Certification Services and hereafter referred to as CCS TW, to act on our behalf in all manners relating to application for equipment authorization, including signing of all documents relating to these matters. Any and all acts carried out by CCS TW on our behalf shall have the same effect as acts of our own. We, the undersigned, hereby certify that we are not subject to a denial of federal benefits, that includes FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. 853(a). In authorizing CCS TW as our agent, we still recognize that we are responsible to: a) Comply with the relevant provisions of the certification program; b) Make all necessary arrangements for the conduct of the evaluation, including provision for examining documentation and access to all areas, records (including internal audit reports) and personnel for the purposes of evaluation (e.g. testing, inspection, assessment, surveillance, reassessment) and resolution of complaints; c) Make claims regarding certification only in respect of the scope for which certification has been granted; d) Do not use our product certification in such a manner as to bring the Certification Division into disrepute and not make any statement regarding our product certification which the Certification Division may consider misleading or unauthorized; e) Upon suspension or cancellation of certification, discontinue use of all advertising matter that contains any reference thereto and return any certification documents as required by the Certification Division; f) Use certification only to indicate the products are certified as being in conformity with specified standards; g) Endeavor to ensure that no certificate or report nor any part thereof is used in a misleading manner; h) Ensure that any reference to our product certification in communication media such as documents, brochures or advertising, complies with the requirements of the Certification Division; i) Keep a record of all complaints made known to the us relating to the product’s compliance with requirements of the relevant standard and to make these records available to the Certification Division when requested; j) Take appropriate action with respect to such complaints and any deficiencies found in products or services that affect compliance with the requirements for certification; k) Document the actions taken. This authorization is valid until further written notice from the applicant. Sincerely Yours, Mark Gandler/ Sr. Compliance Engineer NETGEAR, Inc. REMARK: 1. This authorization letter will be sent along with your application when filing with the Certification Division. 2. Please follow the format and type it on company letterhead and send original to us.

NETGEAR, Inc. 4500 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, U.S.A. March 16, 2006 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division FCC ID: PY306100029 Confidentiality Request Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, the Applicant hereby requests confidential treatment of information accompanying this Application as outlined below: 1. Schematics 2. Operational Description 3. Block Diagram The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the Applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Applicant understands that pursuant to Rule 0.457, disclosure of this Application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the Grant for this application. Sincerely, Mark Gandler/ Sr. Compliance Engineer NETGEAR, Inc.

Helen Zhao Subject: FW: Re : RE: Netgear, Inc., FCC ID: PY306100029, Assessment NO.: AN06T5595, Notice#1 3/30/2006 -----Original Message----- From: amanda.wu [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of application Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 6:08 AM To: Helen Zhao Cc: Application (E-mail) Subject: Re : RE: Netgear, Inc., FCC ID: PY306100029, Assessment NO.: AN06T5595, Notice#1 Dear Helen, Please refer to below for our reply. Best Regards, Amanda -----Original Message----- Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 6:35 PM Subject: Netgear, Inc., FCC ID: PY306100029, Assessment NO.: AN06T5595, Notice#1 Question #1: Please describe how EMC report and test data accounts for all modulations (DBPSK, DQPSK, CCK, BPSK, QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM, MIMO) as indicated in Operational Description. Please identify the modulation used for all available data rates and data modes (e. g. MIMO, MIMO plus ACE, SIMO, SIMO plus ACE), because power may change among these rates and modes. Ans.: The worst case we investigated are added in test report page 7. Besides, please also refer to attached file for appendix 3 for the test modes we verified. Question # 2 : The EMC report lists 2412MHz as low channel, 2462MHz as high channel for SIMO ACE mode, which is incorrect (the test plots are correct, though). Please update the test report. Ans.: Revised and please refer to page 14, 28, 42, 73 of report for details. Question # 3 : The EMC report shows LISN used for power line conducted emission test was past due when the test was done. Please explain. Ans.: It's typo and please refer to page 8 of report for details. Question # 4 : If both modes are possible (e.g. transmittions at 2.4GHz with signal or dual signals), both modes have to be tested. Please clarify whether these modes were investigated for all tests: line conducted, conducted spurious, raidated emissions in restricted band, etc. Ans.: This device is capabile to communicate with other non-MIMO devices, however, after investigated the output power for both modes of single and dual chains, and found that the output power for single and dual chains are almost the same. Therefore, we then chose dual chains as the worst mode for line conducted, conducted spurious, raidated emissions in restricted band, etc. Question # 5 : SAR report was submitted along with the filing. Please explain in which condition, the device will be operating in portable configurations. Please justify how five test modes were selected, especially why 23.5mm separation distance were used for model 4 & 5 testing. The base can be removed, right? Ans. SAR test was conducted is based on customer's (Netgear) request. And according to customer's information, all configurations which would touch human body directly shall be investigated and that's why 5 modes were reported. Besides, based on customer's statement, the base could not be removed when the device being used. Question # 6 : SAR Test report shows 802.11g MIMO mode left tough was test with Chain 1 power setting = 14.66dBm, which is much lower than 15.25dBm in EMC test, please explain. Ans.: It's typo and please refer to page 4, 9 revised SAR test report for details. Q uestion # 7 : SAR test plots system performance check on 3/7/06 shows conversion factor 6.14, 6.14, 6.14, which does not agree with e-probe calibration report. Please correct and resubmit the test plot. Ans.: It's revised on page 1 and please refer to attached file for SAR report and plot. Question # 8 : Please indicate whether the signals have fixed phase relationship (i.e. same signal) or if beam-forming is used. Please verify that the current system does not use any beam-forming enhancements. If beam-forming is used, the antenna gain in dBi must include an additional array gain of 10 log (N), where N is teh number of the antennas. If the phase relationship between the signal is independently varing, an additional array gain is not necessary. Ans.: By double checking with customer, this device doesn't use any beam-forming enhancements. Question # 9 : Please provide any appropriate description of diversity and coding mechanism (e.g. spatial multiplexing or time- space code multiplexing) which may have impacted on the selection of test sequence and procedures. Ans.: Please refer to attached theory of operation-1 for details. Please help to keep confidenital. Best Regards, Helen Zhao The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 30 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal and forfeiture of the filing fee. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the e-mail address listed below the name of the sender. 3/30/2006

SHEET: AUTHOR:TITLE: P/N: REV: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE DATA DISCLOSED HEREIN OR WHEREWITH IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, USED OR DISCLOSED IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO ANYONE WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF NETGEAR, INC. REV DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONENG APPDDATE 5 01AW-10059-031 of 1 AW, WPNT121, V1H1, PLBL M YU 03/21/06M YUINITIAL DOCUMENT CREATION01 Pantone Cool Gray 11C NOTE: 1. REFER TO NETGEAR SPEC. DOC-00093 FOR COLOR TOLERANCES. 2. MAC & SERIAL NUMBERS TO BE PRINTED BY THE ODM. SAMPLE GRAPHICS SHOWN IN GREEN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. DO NOT PRINT GREEN GRAPHICS. 3. DIE LINE IS MAGENTA COLOR. DO NOT PRINT. 4. INK COLOR IS SHOWN TO THE RIGHT. 5. INSURE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN IS CORRECT. A. IF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN IS PRE-PRINTED, UNHIDE THE APPROPRIATE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LAYER AND INCLUDE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN ON LABEL. B. IF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN IS POST-PRINTED USING A THERMAL PRINTER (OR EQUIVALENT), UNHIDE THE WHITE BOX LAYER AND INCLUDE WHITE BOX ON LABEL.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002 Date of Issue: March 14, 2006 Page 2 Rev.00 INTERNAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002 Date of Issue: March 14, 2006 Page 3 Rev.00 Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002 Date of Issue: March 14, 2006 Page 4 Rev.00 Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002 Date of Issue: March 14, 2006 Page 5 Rev.00

Item 1.1 2.2 3.3~5 4.6 5.7~10 6.11~13 7.14~23 8.24~63 ................................. ................................. .................. .................. ............... INDEX Content ................................. ................................. ................................. ................................. ............... Antenna Assembly Specification 1. Electrical Properties 1.1 Frequency Range.................... 2.4~2.5GHz 1.2 Impedance............................. 50Ω 1.3 Return Loss............................ <-10dBi 1.4 VSWR................................... 1.92 Max. 1.5 Peak Gain.............................. <[email protected]~2.50GHz 1.6 Average Gain...........................>[email protected]~2.50GHz 1.7 Admitted Power........................1W 2. Physical Properties 2.1 Operating Temp......................... -10 ~ +55 2.2 Storage Temp............................-30 ~ +75 NETGEAR Antenna Test Report Measurement Time2006/01/13 Measurement Instrument 1Agilent Technologies E5071A 300K~8.5GHz ENASeries Network Analyzer 2Chamber3.5m(W) * 3.25m(H) * 7.12m(L) Gain Horn AntennaSG-430 1.7~2.6GHz Measurement Frequency2.4 GHz ~ 2.5GHz Photo Antenna position X Z Y Left Right Antenna VSWR Left Side Right Side Antenna VSWR Frequency 2.4GHz 2.45GHz 2.5GHz Left Side 1.20 1.18 1.41 Right Side 1.31 1.20 1.37 Antenna Peak Gain & Average Gain Test Result Antenna Peak Gain (dBi) Average Gain (dBi) Frequency 2.4GHz 2.45GHz 2.5GHz 2.4GHz 2.45GHz 2.5GHz Left Side 1.93 1.90 1.92 -0.16 -0.40 -0.54 Right Side 1.94 1.89 1.96 0.04 -0.25 0.08 Antenna Pattern Left Side 2.4GHz~2.5GHz -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 2400 MHz H V H + V -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 2450 MHz H V H + V -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 2500 MHz H V H + V Right Side 2.4GHz~2.5GHz -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 2400 MHz H V H + V -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 2450 MHz H V H + V -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 2500 MHz H V H + V 3 Adhesive Transfer Tapes with Adhesive 200 467 • 468 • 9567 • 9568 Product Description 3M™ Adhesive Transfer Tapes with 3M™ Adhesive 200 are the industry choice for metal nameplates for the industrial or electronic applications because of excellent quality, consistency and durability. In addition, as a result of 3M’s innovative, proprietary process, Adhesive 200 also offers the following performance characteristics: • Excellent high temperature performance as well as excellent shear strength (that minimizes edge lifting and slippage of parts). • Excellent resistance to harsh environments; this adhesive can withstand splashes of organic solvents, weak acids and bases and salt water. In addition, it performs well after exposures to humidity and hot/cold cycles. •Outstanding peel adhesion values are outstanding on metals and HSE plastics. Peel adhesion increases with increased adhesive thickness. Technical DataSeptember, 2002 Construction AdhesiveAdhesiveLinerLiner Type/Thickness 1 Color, Type,Caliper/ Color(mils, mm)PrintLiner Release 2 Tape 4672002.3 mils62# Densified Kraft3.8 mils (0.06 mm)15 grams/inch Tape 4682005.2 mils62# Densified Kraft3.8 mils (0.13 mm)33 grams/inch Tape 95672002.3 mils62# Densified Kraft3.8 mils Fibered(0.06 mm)21 grams/inch Tape 95682005.2 mils62# Densified Kraft3.8 mils Fibered(0.13 mm)29 grams/inch Note 1: The caliper listed is based on a calculation from manufacturing controlled adhesive coat weights using a density of 1.012 g/cc. While past data pages have listed nominal thicknesses of 2 and 5 mils, the coat weight (and theoretical caliper) has not changed. Note 2: Typical liner release value, in grams/inch, tested at 90 ipm. - 2 - I. Adhesion to stainless steel ASTM D3330 modified (90 degree peel, 2 mil aluminum foil backing) Tape 467/9567Tape 468/9568 Dwellounces/inchN/100 mmounces/inchN/100 mm 15 minute room temperature (RT)66729098 72 hour RT91100130142 72 hour 158°C (70°C)150164207226 II. Adhesion to Other Surfaces ASTM D3330 modified (90 degree peel, 2 mil aluminum foil backing) Tape 467/9567Tape 468/9568 Dwellounces/inchN/100 mmounces/inchN/100 mm 72 hour RT ABS57627077 72 hour RT glass8290113124 III. Relative High Temperature Operating Ranges Short term (minutes/hours)350°F (177°C) Long term (days/weeks)250°F (121°C) IV. Shelf Life of Tape in Roll Form24 months from the manufacturing date when stored at 70°F (21°C) and 50% relative humidity. V. Environmental Performance The properties defined are based on the attachment of impervious faceplate materials (such as aluminum) to an aluminum test surface. Bond Build-up: The bond strength of 3M™ Adhesive 200 increases as a function of time and temperature. Humidity Resistance: High humidity has a minimal effect on adhesive performance. Bond strengths are generally higher after exposure for 7 days at 90°F (32°C) and 90% relative humidity. UV Resistance: When properly applied, nameplates and decorative trim parts are not adversely affected by outdoor exposure. Water Resistance: Immersion in water has no appreciable effect on the bond strength. After 100 hours in room temperature water the bond actually shows an increase in strength. Temperature Cycling Resistance: Bond strength generally increases after cycling four times through:4 hours at 158°F (70°C) 4 hours at -20°F (-29°C) 16 hours at room temperature Chemical Resistance: When properly applied, nameplate and decorative trim parts will hold securely after exposure to numerous chemicals including gasoline, MEK, oil, Freon™ TF, sodium chloride solution, mild acids and alkalis. VI. Low…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002-SF FCC ID: PY306100029 Date of Issue: March 07, 2006 Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services Inc. This document may be altered or revised by Compliance Certification Services Inc. personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision section of the document. Page 1 Total Page: 31 Rev. 00 ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 in accordance with the requirements of FCC Report and Order: ET Docket 93-62, and OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C FCC TEST REPORT For RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 Trade Name: NETGEAR Model: WPNT121 Issued to NETGEAR, Inc. 4500 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, U.S.A. Issued by Compliance Certification Services Inc. No. 11, Wu-Kung 6 Rd, Wu-Ku Hsiang, Wu-Ku Industrial District, Taipei Hsien, (248) Taiwan. http://www.ccsemc.com.tw [email protected] Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002-SF Date of Issue: March 07, 2006 Page 2 Rev.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EUT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC .................... 5 3. DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEM .............................................................................. 5 3.1 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM DIAGRAM .................................................................... 6 3.2 SYSTEM COMPONENTS............................................................................................ 7 4. EVALUATION PROCEDURES ............................................................................................. 9 5. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY .................................................................................... 13 6. EXPOSURE LIMIT ............................................................................................................... 14 7. TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF INGREDIENTS FOR LIQUID TISSUE PHANTOMS .... 15 8. MEASUREMENT RESULTS ............................................................................................... 16 8.1 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK......................................................................... 16 8.2 TEST LIQUID CONFIRMATION.............................................................................. 18 8.3 EUT TUNE-UP PROCEDURES................................................................................. 19 8.4 SAR MEASUREMENTS RESULTS.......................................................................... 20 9. EUT PHOTOS....................................................................................................................... 25 10. EQUIPMENT LIST & CALIBRATION STATUS ............................................................... 29 11. FACILITIES .......................................................................................................................... 30 12. REFERENCES....................................................................................................................... 30 13. ATTACHMENTS .................................................................................................................. 31 Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002-SF Date of Issue: March 07, 2006 Page 3 Rev.00 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (SAR EVALUATION) Applicant NETGEAR, Inc. 4500 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, U.S.A. Equipment Under Test: RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 Trade Name: NETGEAR Model Number: WPNT121 Date of Test: March 07~22, 2006 Device Category: PORTABLE DEVICES Exposure Category: GENERAL POPULATION/UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE APPLICABLE STANDARDS STANDARD TEST RESULT FCC OET 65 Supplement C No non-compliance noted Deviation from Applicable Standard None The device was tested by Compliance Certification Services Inc. in accordance with the measurement methods and procedures specified in OET Bulletin 65 Supplement C(Edition 01-01). The test results in this report apply only to the tested sample of the stated device/equipment. Other similar device/equipment will not necessarily produce the same results due to production tolerance and measurement uncertainties. Approved by: Reviewed by: Gavin Lim Chris Hsieh Section Manager Section Manager Compliance Certification Services Inc. Compliance Certification Services Inc. Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002-SF Date of Issue: March 07, 2006 Page 4 Rev.00 1. EUT DESCRIPTION Product RangeMax™ 240 Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter WPNT121 Trade Name NETGEAR Model Number WPNT121 Model Discrepancy N/A Frequency Range 802.11b / g: 2400 ~ 2483.5 MHz 802.11g MIMO: 2400 ~ 2483.5 MHz 802.11g SIMO CB: 2400 ~ 2483.5 MHz Transmit Total Power(AV) 802.11b: 17.89 dBm 802.11g: 16.97 dBm 802.11g MIMO: 17.99 dBm 802.11g SIMO CB: 17.69 dBm Max. SAR (1g): 802.11b: 0.442 W/kg 802.11g: 0.410 W/kg 802.11g MIMO: 0.391 W/kg 802.11g SIMO CB: 0.306 W/kg Modulation Technique 802.11b: Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) 802.11g: Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) 802.11g MIMO: Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) 802.11g SIMO CB: Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) Antenna Specification Ant. Type: PCB Antenna HOST Dell: Model: D600 ; S/N: CN-0T9369-48643-4CB-0392 Compliance Certification Services Inc. Report No: 60221002-SF Date of Issue: March 07, 2006 Page 5 Rev.00 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE TESTING DEFINED BY THE FCC The US Federal Communications Commission has released the report and order “Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of RF Radiation", ET Docket No. 93-62 in August 1996 [1]. The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g for an uncontrolled environment and 8.0 mW/g for an occupational/controlled environment as re…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Date/Time: 3/7/2006 3:32:29 PM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services Inc. D2450V2-SN 728-Body 20060307 DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: D2450V2 - SN:728 Communication System: CW2450; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; σ = 2.02 mho/m; ε r = 51.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section Air Temperature:24.4 deg C;Liquid Temperature:23.3 deg C Area Scan Find Secondary Maximum Within 2dB and with a peak SAR value greater than 0.0012W/kg DASY4 Configuration: z Pr obe: EX3DV4 - SN3554; ConvF(6.12, 6.12, 6.12); z Sensor-Surface: 2.5mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)Sensor-Surface: 0mm (Fix Surface) z Electronics: DAE3 Sn427; Calibrated: 9/22/2005 z Phantom: SAM 12; Type: SAM V4.0; Serial: TP-1150 z Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 160 Pin=250mW,d=10mm/Area Scan (6x6x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 12.3 mW/g Pin=250mW,d=10mm/Zoom Scan (5x5x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=7.5mm, dy=7.5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 99.5 V/m; Power Drift = -0.017 dB Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 28.9 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 13.6 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 6.1 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 19.6 mW/g Pin=250mW,d=10mm/Z Scan (1x1x21): Measurement grid: dx=20mm, dy=20mm, dz=5mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 20.0 mW/g Page1 Page2 Date/Time: 3/22/2006 09:05:33 AM Test Laboratory: Compliance Certification Services Inc. D2450V2 SN-728 Head DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: D2450V2 - SN:728 Communication System: CW2450; Frequency: 2450 MHz;Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; σ = 1.91 mho/m; ε r = 51.7; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 Phantom section: Flat Section Air Temperature:24.2 deg C;Liquid Temperature:23.0 deg C…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.