SUN-0226000Telemetry Device

PRELIMINARY COPY P/N 02-81011 v 2.2 User Guide Please review this document thoroughly prior to using the HIT System™. Deleted: 0 PRELIMINARY COPY Page 2 of 19 P/N 02-81011 v 2.2 FCC Compliance Regulatory Statements These FCC statements apply to SIDELINE RECEIVER and MxENCODER: Compliance Statement ( Part 15.19 ) The SIDELINE RECEIVER and MxENCODER devices comply with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 1. These devices may not cause harmful interference, and 2. These devices must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. Warning ( Part 15.21 ) Changes or modifications not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment. SIDELINE RECEIVER RF Exposure ( OET Bulletin 65 ) To comply with FCC’s RF exposure limits for general population / uncontrolled exposure, the antenna(s) used for this transmitter must be installed to provide a separation distance of at least 20 cm from all persons and must not be co-located or operating in conjunction with any other antenna or transmitter. MxENCODER This device and its antenna has shown compliance with FCC’s SAR limits for general population / uncontrolled exposure for a portable device. The maximum listed SAR level is 1.27 W/kg (head). The antenna used for this device must not be co-located or operating in conjunction with any other antenna or transmitter. Industry Canada Statement The term “IC” before the certification/registration number only signifies that the Industry Canada technical specifications were met. SIDELINE RECEIVER Section 5.5 of RSS-210 This device has been designed to operate with an antenna having a maximum gain of 5 dBi using an omni directional antenna. Antenna having a higher gain is strictly prohibited per regulations of Industry Canada. The required antenna impedance is 50 ohms. Section 5.11 of RSS-210 To reduce potential radio interference to other users, the antenna type and its gain should be so chosen that the equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) is not more than that required for successful communication. MxENCODER Section 14 of RSS-210 The installer of this radio equipment must ensure that the antenna is located or pointed such that it does not emit RF field in excess of Health Canada limits for the general population. Consult Safety Code 6, obtainable from Health Canada’s website: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/rpb . Deleted: and 8 dBi if a directional patch antenna is used Deleted: 0 PRELIMINARY COPY Page 3 of 19 P/N 02-81011 v 2.2 INDEX INTRODUCTION 4 ABOUT SIMBEX 4 THE BASICS 5 INITIAL SETUP 6 FIELD CASE 6 BATTERY CHARGER CASE 8 MXENCODER INSTALLATION 9 PRE-GAME SETUP 10 HIT SYSTEM™ SETUP 10 SOFTWARE INITIALIZATION 10 MXENCODER BATTERY PACK INSTALLATION 11 SOFTWARE GUIDE 12 LAYOUT 12 SOFTWARE USE 15 DATA ANALYSIS 17 POST-GAME BREAKDOWN 18 MAINTENANCE 19 TROUBLESHOOTING 19 CONTACT INFORMATION 19 Copyrights - Copyright 2004 by Simbex LLC. All rights reserved. Patents - This product covered by US Patent 6,826,509, other patents pending. Deleted: 0 PRELIMINARY COPY Page 4 of 19 P/N 02-81011 v 2.2 INTRODUCTION Trainers, coaches and officials of contact sports have long sought to protect players from head injury. But, in hard-hitting sports like football, what can be done? The best equipment, coaching and enforcement of the rules cannot completely protect against mild brain trauma and concussion. Potential injury-producing impacts can go unnoticed and the resulting physiological damage may even be cumulative. Groundbreaking technology developed by Simbex and supported by the National Institutes of Health could change all that. The system is called the Head Impact Telemetry System™ (HIT System™) and is the first device to continuously monitor, analyze and record a player’s on-field head impact experience, and which is practical enough to be used in all game and practice situations. The HIT System not only monitors and records the impact history for all players simultaneously, but also can signal the sidelines staff to the occurrence of an impact that conforms to a Suspect Impact Profile™. The system monitors standard impact measures, such as maximum g’s, Head Impact Criteria (HIC), and Gadd Severity Index (GSI), or customized metrics based on any of the following components: • Impact location • Impact magnitude • Impact duration • Linear and angular acceleration components • And the exact times, of single or multiple impacts for improved player protection from serious injury. About Simbex – “Simply Better Exercise ” The Head Impact Telemetry System has been developed and patented by Simbex. Simbex has been researching, testing and creating products that benefit active people since its inception. Simbex is a research and product development company, specializing in biomechanical feedback systems, with research awards from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. Our goal is to bring to market Deleted: 0 PRELIMINARY COPY Page 5 of 19 P/N 02-81011 v 2.2 the most innovative products and timely solutions for “active life improvement” in the areas of prosthetics, rehabilitation, and injury prevention. It is our sincere hope that Simbex, our research / development partners and this technology will combine to make contact sports safer for all players. For more information, please visit us on the web @ www.simbex.com . The Basics Please read this User’s Guide completely before set-up and use of the HIT System. If you need assistance with your first use of the system, please call Simbex Technical Support at the number listed in the CONTACT INFORMATION section. The HIT System™ is comprised of four main systems: the MXEncoders, the Sideline Receiver, the Alert Pager, and the Computer. The Sideline Receiver, Alert Pager, and Computer are all stored within a protective Field Case. The MX Encoders are installed inside Riddell VSR-4 and Revolution football he…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

10 Water Street, Suite 410 Lebanon, NH 03766 T: 603-448-2367 F: 603-448-0380 F C C CONFIDENTIALITY Date: 01/31/05 Time: 11:15 a.m To: FCC Authorization & Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21045-0429 From: Richard M. Greenwald Phone: 603-448-2367 President Fax: 603-448-0380 Applicant: Simbex LLC E-Mail: [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________ Subject: Request for Non disclosure for FCC ID: SUN–0226000 To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to 47 CFR Section 0.459, Simbex hereby requests non disclosure and confidential treatment of the following materials submitted in support of FCC certification application for FCC ID # SUN–0226000. a. Schematic Diagrams b. Operational Description c. Block Diagram Above materials contain trade secrets, proprietary and technical information which would customarily be guarded from competitors under 47 CRF section 0.457(d)(2). Disclosure or publication of any portion of this company confidential material to other parties could cause substantial competitive harm and provide unjustified benefits for competitors. Simbex understands that pursuant to 47 CFR section 0.457(d)(1)(ii) disclosure of the applicant and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the grant. Sincerely yours, _____________________________________ By: Richard M. Greenwald, PhD Title: President Phone: 603-448-2367

Response to TCB Findings Conducted power in SAR report should be greater than or equal to what’s in EMC report, but not exceeding tune-up/tolerance. The EMC sample was able to provide 200mW power, while SAR sample provided 173mW. Please clarify. Response - In regards to the 0.7 dB power measurement difference between the two laboratories, we have compiled a description of how the tests were administered at each lab, and maintain that the variation is within the expected tolerances in measurements. The following items are presented for consideration: a) The same sample was tested at both laboratories. b) The power level settings, on the sample, were not altered in any way. c) The power level was measured in two ways, it was measured on a power meter at PC Test Labs, and it was measured on a spectrum analyzer at L.S. Compliance. d) The connection to the EUT was similar, as a BNC pig-tail was soldered on the EUT at PC Test Labs, and an SMA pig-tail was soldered on at L.S. Compliance. e) The pig-tail cable loss was entered on the instruments as adjustments and was included in the measurement. f) Test equipment used in both laboratories are calibrated. The items above demonstrate that proper procedure was followed. The 0.7 dB differences in the published results may be caused by using a power meter versus a spectrum analyzer, combined with the use of two different types of pig-tails, the characterization of which is difficult at best, and may introduce tolerances exceeding 0.5 dB in soldering iterations. Please supply manufacturer's dipole calibration data used during SAR test system validation. The certification is attached. Please note that we use IEEE 1528 targets for validation. Has liquid dielectric parameters been verified at 915MHz test frequency? They appear to be the same values used for validation and probe calibration at 835MHz. Please clarify. The test frequency and the validation frequency are within the 100 MHz range allowed by the FCC. Please provide more information on "Area" and "Zoom" scan procedures and "Peak" and "1g- SAR" measurements. The Scan description is attached.

Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo One – External Football Helmet with MxEncoder Transceiver Radio Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Two – External Football Helmet with MxEncoder Transceiver Radio embedded inside the Helmet’s Padding as an add-on to the Helmets Interior Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Three – External Helmet’s Padding Material that contains the Transceiver Radio Circular features are the Impact Sensors Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Four – External Helmet’s Padding Material with Battery Compartment on the right side of Photo exposing the FCC ID Label Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Five – External Battery Compartment on the right side of Photo exposing the FCC ID Label Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Six – External Close-Up of FCC ID Label

MxEncoder Draft Label [________2.625”____________] This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and 2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. FCC ID: SUN-0226000 IC: 5602A-0226000 Notes: 1. Material: Weatherproof white polyester 2. Print: Text and Graphics-Black 3. Adhesive adheres to metal, plastic, glass, etc. 4. Manufacturer: Avery 1.000”

Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo One – Internal Padding Material Open for Inspection Note: Radio is sealed inside the Padding Material that is inserted inside the Football Helmet Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Two – Internal Padding Material ... Open for Inspection Radio exposed to view Close-Up of PCB Flip Side Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Three – Internal Padding Material ... Open for Inspection PCB showing Radio Section Shielded with PCB Antenna Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Four – Internal Padding Material ... Open for Inspection Radio Section Shielding Removed Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Five – Internal Padding Material ... Open for Inspection PCB Antenna Connection Simbex, LLC Real-Time Head Acceleration Monitor MxEncoder Transceiver Radio 902 – 928 MHz FCC ID: SUN-0226000 Photo Six – Internal Padding Material ... Open for Inspection Power Lead Wires and Sensor Connection Wiring

ALIDX-500 Area: During an area scan, global and local maxima searches are automatically performed in 2-D after each Area Scan measurement with at least 6 measurement points. It is based on the evaluation of the local SAR gradient calculated by the Quadratic Shepard’s method. Zoom: For dosimetric application, it is necessary to assess the peak spatial SAR value averaged over a volume. For this purpose, fine resolution zoom scans need to be performed at the peak SAR location(s) determined during the Area Scan. These scans are called Zoom Scans. The default Zoom Scan measures 7 x 7 x 7 points with a step size of 5mm. Faster evaluations can be achieved with a reduced number of measurement points. For example, a Zoom Scan with a grid step size in x- and y-directions of 7.5 mm (5 x 5 x 7 cube configuration) reduces the measurement time to almost half with only 1-2% difference in SAR reading compared to the fine- resolution 7 x 7 x 7 scan. Extrapolation Procedures: Extrapolation routines are used to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The extrapolation distance is determined by the surface detection distance and the probe sensor offset. Several measurements at different distances are necessary for the extrapolation. Extrapolation routines require at least 10 measurement points in 3-D space. They are used in the Zoom Scan to obtain SAR values between the lowest measurement points and the inner phantom surface. The routine uses the modified Quadratic Shepard’s method for extrapolation. For a grid using 7x7x7 measurement points with 5mm resolution amounting to 343 measurement points, the uncertainty of the extrapolation routines is less than 1% for 1 g and 10 g cubes. Boundary Effects: For measurements in the immediate vicinity of a phantom surface, the field coupling effects between the probe and the boundary influence the probe characteristics. Boundary effect errors of different dosimetric probe types have been analyzed by measurements and using a numerical probe model. As expected, both methods showed an enhanced sensitivity in the immediate vicinity of the boundary. The effect strongly depends on the probe dimensions and disappears with increasing distance from the boundary. The sensitivity can be approximately given as: Since the decay of the boundary effect dominates for small probes (a <<λ), the cos-term can be omitted. Factors S b and a are assessed during probe calibration and used for numerical compensation of the boundary effect. Several simulations and measurements have confirmed that the compensation is valid for different field and boundary configurations. This simple compensation procedure can largely reduce the probe uncertainty near boundaries. It works well as long as: • the boundary curvature is small • the probe axis is angled less than 30 o to the boundary normal • the distance between probe and boundary is larger than 25% of the probe diameter • the probe is symmetric (all sensors have the same offset from the probe tip) Since all of these requirements are fulfilled in the ALIDX-500 system, the correction of the probe boundary effect in the vicinity of the phantom surface is performed in a fully automated manner via the measurement data extraction during postprocessing. Spatial Peak and 1g averaging: The interpolated data is used to average the SAR over the 1g and 10g cubes by spatially discretizing the entire measured volume. The resolution of this spatial grid used to calculate the averaged SAR is 1mm or about 42875 interpolated points. The resulting volumes are defined as cubical volumes containing the appropriate tissue parameters that are centered at the location. The location is defined as the center of the incremental volume (voxel). The spatial-peak SAR must be evaluated in cubical volumes containing a mass that is within 5% of the required mass. The cubical volume centered at each location, as defined above, should be expanded in all directions until the desired value for the mass is reached, with no surface boundaries of the averaging volume extending beyond the outermost surface of the considered region. In addition, the cubical volume should not consist of more than 10% of air. If these conditions are not satisfied then the center of the averaging volume is moved to the next location. Otherwise, the exact size of the final sampling cube is found using an inverse polynomial approximation algorithm, leading to results with improved accuracy. If one boundary of the averaging volume reaches the boundary of the measured volume during its expansion, it will not be evaluated at all. Reference is kept of all locations used and those not used for averaging the SAR. All average SAR values are finally assigned to the centered location in each valid averaging volume. All locations included in an averaging volume are marked to indicate that they have been used at least once. If a location has been marked as used, but has never been assigned to the center of a cube, the highest averaged SAR value of all other cubical volumes which have used this location for averaging, is assigned to this location. Only those locations that are not part of any valid averaging volume should be marked as unused. For the case of an unused location, a new averaging volume must be constructed which will have the unused location centered at one surface of the cube. The remaining five surfaces are expanded evenly in all directions until the required mass is enclosed, regardless of the amount of included air. Of the six possible cubes with one surface centered on the unused location, the smallest cube is used, which still contains the required mass. If the final cube containing the highest averaged SAR touches the surface of the measured volume, an appropriate warning is issued within the Postprocessing engine. Interpolation The probe is calibrated at the center of the dipole sensors which is located 2.5mm away from the probe tip. During measurements,…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

         



 !"#



$  %%&'%"! (# )*+"! (#" ',,&-))...&/,%0,/1%-234&/,%0,/5

 

  



    
 
   $  
 

%6%.%3-

 
*%%-




%0,,%0-
 


 


$3&%- !
"#$%
& %'!
* - (
)

'*


    




  7  - 7   * - 
 !"#$%"&#''( )'* ++,&)'-+. "'(')#)''/#"  !! 0'/122
 
3,    
     $3&%-8% &/,/%2 +*2%9%/3-(  "( :; 8<1*85 + *,&,
.%2- !:=> 1 =: 5/,% + %02%%,- ! :> )?@8%  2%%)%105-
   *00A/,-
2,!#&2%&%/,220,,%215 * %
2,105-B !(=C*) %,#&&%%, DE3 !F %0,%6/%%2- %,/
2,,3&%D)-! !:"G:F  '0.2%%00%6/%'0%%%%%&2,%3,'%&&/,'00'.,%/&%A/&/%A2 /<%0&%/A/02&,2,%1 5A2/,2%%62%,)@%%2&&,%+&02%,00&%/A%   ) ,(#!G!(( '%%,%0,%//2/%.,','%%02%%,&2/%2%00&%/A% *) %,#&&%%,1 !5 0,23 G!  ,!# ;G =  ,,%0,,,'%//2/3A, %02%%,02%&2,%'%2%.%2%&%2A2%3%2.%2%%%23 0&%260  2% /22%/, , ,'% %0, A 3 ?.%@%  %%A   00% A 2%0&0,3 A2 ,'% /&%,%%00A,'%0%%02%%,06/'A2,'%9A/,0A&%200,?@,'% 

                           !""#$%&&&"'$&
 









    
 
   $  
 

%6%.%3-

 
*%%-




%0,,%0-
 


 


$3&%- !
"#$%
& %'!
* - (
)

'*


    

 *


"+,-.+",
/

-&""+",




&& &+
&+)

0"-1
&"&0-
),2&
3+& 

),2&
.0"2+",
),.&(

) +,
4
&"50&+
+"&6
(

+&+
3+&
)&."".+",
6
+&+
.,"7+",
),"+",8

"/"&&&
.8

88


&1),&
0" "+
8
&& &+
.&+"+"&

3+&
5&"".+",



+&+
-+
 3



-+
 3



+&+
&") &+

.,.0",(


&&&.&6






    
 
   $  
 

%6%.%3-

 
*%%-




%0,,%0-
 


 


$3&%- !
"#$%
& %'!
* - (
)

'*


      !  $ ) *   

+9
..
9:
!'$ !
9
!  :
*'
;
9
; ' # 
** %:
'*
!'* < %
!'

&+
-'%= 
8(
'
 
(
88(
'
$ ' %
9
$%
 !
>' = :
* '#
9
$' 
9? !:
'*

#::' :
!
'
..  !
$' 
! ;% :@A
+9
:* 
#:
: !
*'
9
; ' # 
;'
# : # :

: !
'
9
%  
$:9 !

9
# %
' 
 ! !:
" :
B"C
*'
'%? !
:$ %*%
:' $'

BC

()*( !&!!$      +, - .   /01   .  2  0    #3/4 5/4

B%C
88

9
" :
'*
& % %
 !
& % ' %:
&  :
" %
 >
3' =
 >
3' =
6@A
+9
# : # 
$ '% !
! :%  !

()*(!&!!$ .00
    6  0  
  /4   0    . 6  -,@A
:
: !
*'
! %

# : 

!
'
9

!'
D$':
* '#
9
&<$# 
 !
+ :
B&+C
+9 :
%  
*'

;'

:#
'
9':
%'## ! !

9
' 
.' %
'
!'
) ' %'
 !
: # :
B.)C

7    1       .  2 0    #8
.)
 $' 
'
(
B%C
.)
8(
2 9 :!
-
@(A


:

# :
'*
9

'*

:' $'
!
'
D$':
'


  :#
:' % 


; :
9;

 !
'
9 :9'!
 ; :
*'
$' 
'' %
9? !:

 %A, $ %*%
:' $'

BC
:
! * !
:
9
#
! ;;
B  C
'*
9
 % # 

B
C
:'  !

B!::$ !
 C

…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

L.S. Compliance, Inc. W66 N220 Commerce Court Cedarburg, WI 53012 262-375-4400 Fax: 262-375-4248 COMPLIANCE TESTING OF: MX Encoder Prepared For: Simbex, LLC Attention: Mr. Jeffrey Chu 10 Water Street, Suite 410 Lebanon, NH 03766 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Test Dates: February 28 TH through March 29 TH , 2005 All results of this report relate only to the items that were tested. This report is not to be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of L. S. Compliance, Inc. L.S. Compliance, Inc. Page 2 of 45 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Prepared For: Simbex, LLC Table of Contents Section Description Page Index 2 1 L. S. Compliance in Review 3 2 A2LA Certificate of Accreditation 4 3 A2LA Scope of Accreditation 5 4 Validation Letter-U.S. Competent Body for EMC Directive 89/336/EEC 6 5 Signature Page 7 6 Product and General Information 8 7 Introduction 8 8 Product Description 9 9 Test Requirements 10 10 Summary of Test Report 10 11 Radiated Emissions Test 11-21 12 Band-Edge Measurements 22-23 13 Conducted Emissions onto AC Power Line 24 14 Occupied Bandwidth 25-26 15 RF Power Output 27-28 16 Spurious RF Emissions 29-30 17 Minimum Channel Separation 31-36 18 Channel Occupancy 37-38 19 Frequency and Power Stability requirements 39 20 Equal Channel Usage 40 21 Pseudorandom Hopping Pattern 40 22 Receiver Synchronization 41 23 Receiver Input Bandwidth 41 24 MPE Calculations 42 Appendix A Test Equipment List 43 B Antenna Specification Sheets 44 C Firmware and Setup Instructions 45 L.S. Compliance, Inc. Page 3 of 45 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Prepared For: Simbex, LLC 1. L. S. Compliance In Review L.S. Compliance - Accreditations and Listing’s As an EMC Testing Laboratory, our Accreditation and Assessments are recognized through the following: A2LA – American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Accreditation based on ISO/IEC 17025 : 1999 with Electrical (EMC) Scope of Accreditation A2LA Certificate Number: 1255.01 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) – USA Listing of 3 Meter Semi-Anechoic Chamber based on Title 47 CFR – Part 2.948 FCC Registration Number: 90756 Listing of 3 and 10 meter OATS based on Title 47CFR – Part 2.948 FCC Registration Number: 90757 Industry Canada On file, 3 Meter Semi-Anechoic Chamber based on RSS-212 – Issue 1 File Number: IC 3088-A On file, 3 and 10 Meter OATS based on RSS-212 – Issue 1 File Number: IC 3088 U. S. Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) Validation Validated by the European Commission as a U. S. Competent Body operating under the U. S. /EU, Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) operating under the European Union Electromagnetic Compatibility –Council Directive 89/336/EEC, Article 10.2. Date of Validation: January 16, 2001 Validated by the European Commission as a U.S. Notified Body operating under the U.S./EU, Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) operating under the European Union Telecommunication Equipment – Council Directive 99/5/EC, Annex V. Date of Validation: November 20, 2002 Notified Body Identification Number: 1243 L.S. Compliance, Inc. Page 4 of 45 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Prepared For: Simbex, LLC 2. A2LA Certificate of Accreditation L.S. Compliance, Inc. Page 5 of 45 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Prepared For: Simbex, LLC 3. A2LA Scope of Accreditation L.S. Compliance, Inc. Page 6 of 45 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Prepared For: Simbex, LLC 4. Validation Letter – U.S. Competent Body for EMC Directive 89/336/EEC L.S. Compliance, Inc. Page 7 of 45 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Prepared For: Simbex, LLC 5. Signature Page Prepared By: June 27, 2005 Teresa A. White, Document Coordinator Date Tested By: June 27, 2005 Abtin Spantman, EMC Engineer Date Approved By: June 27, 2005 Kenneth L. Boston, EMC Lab Manager Date PE #31926 Licensed Professional Engineer Registered in the State of Wisconsin, United States L.S. Compliance, Inc. Page 8 of 45 Test Report Number: 304554-Tx-v3 Prepared For: Simbex, LLC 6. Product and General Information Manufacturer: Simbex, LLC Date(s) of Test: February 28 th through March 29 th , 2005 Test Engineer(s): Tom Smith √ Abtin Spantman Ken Boston Model #: MX Encoder Serial #: 121704-0067 Voltage: 3.6 VDC Operation Mode: Normal, continuous transmit, and ‘Hopping’ mode 7. Introduction Between February 28 th and March 29 th , 2005, a series of Conducted and Radiated RF Emission tests were performed on one sample of the Simbex, LLC, Model Number MX Encoder, Serial Number 121704-0067, here forth referred to as the “Equipment Under Test” or “EUT”. These tests were performed using the procedures outlined in ANSI C63.4-2003 for intentional radiators, and in accordance with the limits set forth in FCC Part 15.247 (Industry Canada RSS- 210) for a low power transmitter. These tests were performed by Abtin Spantman, EMC Engineer at L.S. Compliance, Incorporated. All Radiated and Conducted RF Emission tests were performed upon the EUT to measure the emissions in the frequency bands described in Title 47 CFR, FCC Part 15, including 15.35, 15.205, 15.247 and Industry Canada RSS-210 to determine whether these emissions are below the limits expressed within the standards. These tests were performed in accordance with the procedures described in the American National Standard for methods of measurement of Radio- Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.