VBNAHLBBA-01AirScale Base Transceiver Station Remote Radio Head

Nokia Solutions and Networks Tel: (972) 374-3000 6000 Connection Drive Fax: (972) 374-3252 Irving, Texas 75039 June 27, 2019 Nemko Canada Inc. 303 River Road Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1V 1H2 Attn: Director of Certification Authority to Act as Agent FCC On our behalf, I appoint Geremy Bradshaw of Nemko USA, Inc., 2648 FM 407, Suite 200, Bartonville, TX 76226, to act as our agent in the preparation of this application for equipment certification. I certify that submitted documents properly describe the device or system for which equipment certification is sought. I also certify that each unit manufactured, imported or marketed, as defined in FCC regulations will have affixed to it a label identical to that submitted for approval with this application. In signing this letter, Applicant certifies that neither the applicant nor any party to the application is not subject to a denial of Federal benefits, that include FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. § 862 because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the definition of a "party" for these purposes. For instances where our authorized agent signs the application for certification on our behalf, I acknowledge that all responsibility for complying with the terms and conditions for certification, as specified by Nemko Canada Inc, still resides with Nokia Solutions and Networks, 6000 Connection Drive, Irving, TX 75039 USA. Agency agreement expiration date: 27 June 2020. Sincerely, Steve Mitchell Compliance Engineer

Nokia Solutions and Networks Tel: (972) 374-3000 6000 Connection Drive Fax: (972) 374-3252 Irving, Texas 75039 December 19, 2019 Nemko Canada Inc. 303 River Road Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1V 1H2 RE: Confidentiality Request FCC ID: VBNAHLBBA-01 Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the commission’s rules, we hereby request that the following documents be held confidential: • Operation Description (Theory of Operation) • Block Diagram • Schematics/Parts List • Tuning/Calibration Procedure • Internal Photos • User Manual These materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information and are not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of this information might be harmful to the company and provide unjustified benefits to our competitors. Sincerely, Steve Mitchell Compliance Engineer

1 (6) Mutual NDA for R&D and purchasing 1.1 Proprietary and Confidential Nokia Solutions and Networks MUTUAL NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT [Note to drafter: Please check/remove yellow highlighting before sending out.] This Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS US LLC, a corporation validly organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, having its principal place of business at 6000 Connection Drive, Building 4, Irving, Texas, 75039 USA, (“Nokia Networks”) and [insert name of other party], a corporation validly organized and existing under the laws of [insert the country of incorporation of the other party] having its principal place of business at [insert address of the other party] , business identity code [ ] (“Company”) hereinafter referred to as “Party” or “Parties” respectively WHEREAS: (A) For the purpose of [Note to drafter: Please define the specific purpose for which the confidential information is being disclosed. Some examples are given below: Example A.: “...discussions concerning a possible business relationship in which the Company will provide [please describe the products and/or services] to NOKIA NETWORKS for NOKIA NETWORKS’s internal business purposes and/or for use in and in connection with NOKIA NETWORKS’ product/service offerings to its end customers and end users.” (hereinafter "Purpose"), (B) the Parties may, in conjunction with the Purpose and for their mutual benefit, disclose to each other information which the Parties regard as confidential and the Parties are willing to undertake to restrict the use and further disclosure of such information. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY AGREED: 1. “Information” shall mean any technical and/or commercial information relating to the disclosing Party’s or any of its Affiliates’ businesses, facilities, products, services, techniques and processes in whatever form, including but not limited to oral disclosure, electronic communication, demonstration, device, apparatus, model, sample of any kind, computer program, optical or magnetic medium, document, specification, circuit diagram, or drawing (including but not limited to information of a general nature or information not necessarily in the form as applied to wireless or fixed telecommunications systems) and visual observation of the aforesaid which is proprietary to the disclosing Party or to its Affiliates or to a disclosing Party’s or its Affiliates’ licensors, contractors or customers (hereinafter "Information"). 2. “Affiliate” of a Party shall mean an entity (i) which is directly or indirectly controlling such Party; (ii) which is under the same direct or indirect ownership or control as such Party; or (iii) which is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Party. For these purposes, an entity shall be treated as being controlled by another if that other entity has fifty percent (50 %) or more of votes in such entity, is able to direct its affairs and/or to control the composition of its board of directors or equivalent body. 3. The receiving Party shall 2 (6) Mutual NDA for R&D and purchasing 1.1 Proprietary and Confidential Nokia Solutions and Networks a. keep confidential all Information received by it from the disclosing Party with the same degree of care as is used with respect to the receiving Party's own equally important confidential information to avoid disclosure to any third party, but at least with reasonable care, and b. neither disclose Information received by it from the disclosing Party to third parties nor use it for any purpose other than the above mentioned Purpose without the prior written permission of the disclosing Party. 4. The Company recognizes that NOKIA NETWORKS is part of an organization of multiple legal entities in several jurisdictions and that it may be necessary for NOKIA NETWORKS to provide Information to its Affiliates. For this purpose, Company agrees (both as the disclosing Party and as the receiving Party hereunder) that a. NOKIA NETWORKS may disclose Information to its Affiliates but only to the extent that such Affiliate has a need to know for the purpose of carrying out the Purpose; and b. disclosure by or to an Affiliate of NOKIA NETWORKS shall be deemed to be a disclosure by or to NOKIA NETWORKS, as applicable; and c. NOKIA NETWORKS shall be responsible for the observance and proper performance by all of its Affiliates of the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and d. NOKIA NETWORKS may disclose Information to its subcontractors but only to the extent that such subcontractor has a need to know for the purpose of carrying out the Purpose and provided that such subcontractor accepts confidentiality obligations similar to those contained in this Agreement. 5. Subject to the foregoing each Party shall restrict access to Information received from another Party to only those of its employees to whom such access is necessary for carrying out the Purpose and advise such employees of the obligations assumed herein. 6. The foregoing obligations shall not apply to any Information which a. is in the public domain at the time of disclosure or later becomes part of the public domain through no fault of the receiving Party; or b. was known to the receiving Party prior to disclosure by the disclosing Party as proven by the written records of the receiving Party; or c. is disclosed to the receiving Party by a third party who, to the receiving Party’s knowledge, did not obtain such Information, directly or indirectly, from the disclosing Party; or d. was independently developed (i.e. by personnel having either no access to the Information or only under the exceptions as set out above) by the receiving Party as proven by the written records of the receiving Party. For the purpose of the foregoing exceptions, disclosures which are specific, e.g. as to engineering and design practices and techniques, products, software, services, operating parameters, etc. shall not be deemed…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Nokia Solutions and Networks Tel: (972) 374-3000 6000 Connection Drive Fax: (972) 374-3252 Irving, Texas 75039 December 19 th , 2019 To whom it may concern: This is a request to hold the internal photos and user manual for FCC ID: VBNAHLBBA-01 under long term confidentiality. The transmitter is a Base Station where access is controlled and only available to trained personnel. Please note that the internal photos are being asked to be confidential under the FCC guidelines that this is a non-consumer device (Base Station) and is inaccessible to the general public due to the location of the device and it is only serviceable by the licensee or his designated technicians. The user manual is being requested to be confidential under the FCC guidelines that the manual is very technical and is not provided to the general public. The user manual contains proprietary information required for trained installers to commission the base station. The user manual will be used by the licensee or his designated technicians only. Nokia Solutions and Networks has spent substantial effort in developing this product as a leader in the industry. Having the subject information easily available to competitiors would negate the advantage we have achieved by developing this product. Not protecting the details of design will result in financial hardship. Sincerely, __________________________________________ ________________________ (Signature/Title) (Printed name)

AHLBBA Label Format & Location Label Material: White Polyester Model: AHLBBA FCC ID: VBNAHLBBA - 01 IC: 661W - AHLBBA

This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the U.S. Government. This Report shall not be reproduced, except in full without written approval of the laboratory. EAR-Controlled Data - This document contains technical data whose export and reexport/retransfer is subject to control by the U.S. Department of Commerce under the Export Administration Act and the Export Administration Regulations. The Department of Commerce’s prior written approval may be required for the export or re- export/retransfer of such technical data to any foreign person, foreign entity or foreign organization whether in the United States or abroad. Nokia Solutions and Networks Airscale Base Transceiver Station Remote Radio Head Model: AHLBBA FCC 27:2019 FCC 27.53:2019 FCC 90:2019 FCC 90I:2019 Report # NOKI0004.1 NVLAP LAB CODE: 201049-0 CERTIFICATE OF TEST 2018-09-14 Product compliance is the responsibility of the client; therefore, the tests and equipment modes of operation represented in this report were agreed upon by the client, prior to testing. The results of this test pertain only to the sample(s) tested. The specific description is noted in each of the individual sections of the test report supporting this certificate of test. This report reflects only those tests from the referenced standards shown in the certificate of test. It does not include inspection or verification of labels, identification, marking or user information. As indicated in the Statement of Work sent with the quotation, Element’s standard process is to always use the latest published version of the test methods even when earlier versions are cited in the test specification. Issuance of a purchase order was de facto acceptance of this approach. Otherwise, the client would have advised Element in writing of the specific version of the test methods they wanted applied to the subject testing. Last Date of Test: November 20, 2019 Nokia Solutions and Networks EUT: AHLBBA RRH Radio Equipment Testing Standards Specification Method FCC 27:2019 ANSI C63.26:2015 FCC KDB 971168 D01 v03r01 FCC KDB 971168 D03 v01r01 FCC KDB 662911 D01 v02r01 FCC 27.53:2019 FCC 90:2019 FCC 90I:2019 FCC Part 2:2019 Results Test Description Applied Results Comments 5.2.4 Average Output Power Yes Pass For all testing, ERP depends on antenna gain, which is unknown. Only the highest dBm value is plotted per customer requirements and a Watt/MHz calculation was not made due to the unknown antenna value. 5.2.3.4 Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR) Yes Pass Includes for reference, not required by rule parts for the frequency band 5.4 Occupied Bandwidth Yes Pass 5.7 Band Edge Compliance Yes Pass 5.7 Spurious Conducted Emissions Yes Pass 5.5 Spurious Radiated Emissions Yes Pass 5.6 Frequency Stability Yes Pass Deviations From Test Standards None Approved By: Jeremiah Darden, Operations Manager Report No. NOKI0004.12/574 REVISION HISTORY 2018.07.17 Revision Number Description Date (yyyy-mm-dd) Page Number 00 None Report No. NOKI0004.13/574 ACCREDITATIONS AND AUTHORIZATIONS 2019.03.08 United States FCC - Designated by the FCC as a Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB). Certification chambers, Open Area Test Sites, and conducted measurement facilities are listed with the FCC. A2LA - Accredited by A2LA to ISO / IEC 17065 as a product certifier. This allows Element to certify transmitters to FCC and IC specifications. NVLAP - Each laboratory is accredited by NVLAP to ISO 17025 Canada ISED - Recognized by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada as a Certification Body (CB) and as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. European Union European Commission – Within Element, we have a EU Notified Body validated for the EMCD and RED Directives. Australia/New Zealand ACMA - Recognized by ACMA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. Korea MSIT / RRA - Recognized by KCC’s RRA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. Japan VCCI - Associate Member of the VCCI. Conducted and radiated measurement facilities are registered. Taiwan BSMI – Recognized by BSMI as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. NCC - Recognized by NCC as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. Singapore IDA – Recognized by IDA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. Israel MOC – Recognized by MOC as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. Hong Kong OFCA – Recognized by OFCA as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. Vietnam MIC – Recognized by MIC as a CAB for the acceptance of test data. SCOPE For details on the Scopes of our Accreditations, please visit: https://www.nwemc.com/emc-testing-accreditations Report No. NOKI0004.14/574 FACILITIES 2019.03.08 California Labs OC01-17 41 Tesla Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 861-8918 Minnesota Labs MN01-10 9349 W Broadway Ave. Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 (612)-638-5136 Oregon Labs EV01-12 6775 NE Evergreen Pkwy #400 Hillsboro, OR 97124 (503) 844-4066 Texas Labs TX01-09 3801 E Plano Pkwy Plano, TX 75074 (469) 304-5255 Washington Labs NC01-05 19201 120 th Ave NE Bothell, WA 98011 (425)984-6600 NVLAP NVLAP Lab Code: 200676-0 NVLAP Lab Code: 200881-0 NVLAP Lab Code: 200630-0 NVLAP Lab Code:201049-0 NVLAP Lab Code: 200629-0 Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada 2834B-1, 2834B-3 2834E-1, 2834E-3 2834D-1 2834G-1 2834F-1 BSMI SL2-IN-E-1154R SL2-IN-E-1152R SL2-IN-E-1017 SL2-IN-E-1158R SL2-IN-E-1153R VCCI A-0029 A-0109 A-0108 A-0201 A-0110 Recognized Phase I CAB for ISED, ACMA, BSMI, IDA, KCC/RRA, MIC, MOC, NCC, OFCA US0158 US0175 US0017 US0191 US0157 Report No. NOKI0004.15/574 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY TMU.2015.07.10 Measurement Uncertainty When a measurement is made, the result will be different from the true or theoretically correct value. The difference is the result of tolerances in the measurement system that cannot be completely eliminated. To the extent that technology allows us, it has been our aim to minimize this error. Measurement uncertainty is a statistical expression of measurement error qualif…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

EMC TEST EQUIPMENT ID TEW AFM TEST DESCRIPTION Generator - SignalKeysightN5171B-5062-May-182-May-21 DescriptionManufacturerModelLast Cal.Cal. Due AVERAGE POWER Testing was performed using the mode(s) of operation and configuration(s) noted within the report. The individuals and/or the organization requesting the test provided the modes, configurations and settings used to complete the evaluation. The actual test parameters are specified in the test data, this includes items such as investigated frequency range (scanned) and test levels. The testing methods and performance specifications, as well as the test site used for the evaluation are indicated in the test data. Analyzer - Spectrum AnalyzerKeysightN9010A19-Mar-1919-Mar-20 XMit 2019.09.05 The measurement was made using a direct connection between the RF output of the EUT and a spectrum analyzer. The fundamental emission output power (maximum average conducted output power) was measured using the channels and modes as called out on the following data sheets. The transmit power was set to its default maximum. The method in section 5.2.4.4 of ANSI C63.26 was used to make the measurement. This method uses trace averaging across ON and OFF times of the EUT transmissions in the spectrum analyzer channel power function using an RMS detector. Following the measurement a duty cycle correction was applied by adding [10 log (1 / D)], where D is the duty cycle, to the measured power to compute the average power during the actual transmission times. Per FCC sections 27.50(c)(3) and 90.542,the Effective Radiated Power (ERP) of the transceiver cannot exceed 1000 Watts/MHz. Report No. NOKI0004.177/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 EUT:AHLBBA RRHWork Order:NOKI0004 Serial Number:K9193514835Date: Customer:Nokia Solutions and NetworksTemperature:22.7 °C Attendees:John RattanavongHumidity:29.9% RH Project:NoneBarometric Pres.:1019 mbar Tested by:Jonathan KieferPower:54VDCJob Site:TX09 TEST SPECIFICATIONSTest Method COMMENTS DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD Signature Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results Band 12 QPSK Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Multicarrier Test Case 1 Mid Channel, 736.5 MHz48.91048.91000Pass Multicarrier Test Case 3 Mid Channel, 741.5 MHz49.030491000Pass Mid Channel, 723.0 MHz43.57043.61000Pass 16QAM Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Multicarrier Test Case 1 Mid Channel, 736.5 MHz48.89048.91000Pass Multicarrier Test Case 3 Mid Channel, 741.5 MHz49.030491000Pass Mid Channel, 723.0 MHz43.57043.61000Pass 64QAM Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Multicarrier Test Case 1 Mid Channel, 736.5 MHz48.92048.91000Pass Multicarrier Test Case 3 Mid Channel, 741.5 MHz49.040491000Pass Mid Channel, 723.0 MHz43.61043.61000Pass 256QAM Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Multicarrier Test Case 1 Mid Channel, 736.5 MHz48.92048.91000Pass Multicarrier Test Case 3 Mid Channel, 741.5 MHz49.030491000Pass Mid Channel, 723.0 MHz43.51043.51000Pass AVERAGE POWER 18-Nov-19 Configuration #2 FCC 27:2019ANSI C63.26:2015 None Band 12 Multicarrier average power measurements. Tested on highest power antenna port (Port 1). EUT is operated at 100% duty cycle. ERP depends on antenna gain, which is unknown. Only the highest dBm value is plotted per customer requirements and a Watt/MHz calculation was not made due to the unknown antenna value. Average power measurements were made for the multicarrier test cases on four modulation types (QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM, 256QAM): The first multicarrier test case is with three Band 12 LTE5 carriers (based upon KDB 971168 D03v01) using two carriers (with minimum spacing between carrier frequencies) at the Band 12 lower band edge [731.5MHz and 736.5MHz] and a third carrier with maximum spacing between the other two carrier frequencies [741.5MHz] at the Band 12 upper band edge. The third multicarrier test case is with three Band 29/Band 12 LTE5 carriers (based upon KDB 971168 D03v01) using two carriers (with minimum spacing between carrier frequencies) at the Band 29 lower band edge [720.5MHz and 725.5MHz] and a third carrier with maximum spacing between the other two carrier frequencies [741.5MHz] at the Band 12 upper band edge. Report No. NOKI0004.178/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 48.91048.91000Pass Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 49.030491000Pass AVERAGE POWER Band 12, QPSK Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 1, Mid Channel, 736.5 MHz Band 12, QPSK Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 3, Mid Channel, 741.5 MHz Report No. NOKI0004.179/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 43.57043.61000Pass Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 48.89048.91000Pass AVERAGE POWER Band 29, QPSK Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 3, Mid Channel, 723.0 MHz Band 12, 16QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 1, Mid Channel, 736.5 MHz Report No. NOKI0004.180/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 49.030491000Pass Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 43.57043.61000Pass AVERAGE POWER Band 12, 16QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 3, Mid Channel, 741.5 MHz Band 29, 16QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 3, Mid Channel, 723.0 MHz Report No. NOKI0004.181/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 48.92048.91000Pass Avg CondDuty CycleValueLimit Pwr (dBm)Factor (dB)(dBm)(W ERP/MHz)Results 49.040491000Pass AVERAGE POWER Band 12, 64QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 1, Mid Channel, 736.5 MHz Band 12, 64QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Multicarrier Test Case 3, Mid Channel, 741.5 MH…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

EMC TEST EQUIPMENT ID TEW AFM TEST DESCRIPTION PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) XMit 2019.09.05 Testing was performed using the mode(s) of operation and configuration(s) noted within the report. The individuals and/or the organization requesting the test provided the modes, configurations and settings used to complete the evaluation. The actual test parameters are specified in the test data, this includes items such as investigated frequency range (scanned) and test levels. The testing methods and performance specifications, as well as the test site used for the evaluation are indicated in the test data. DescriptionManufacturerModelLast Cal.Cal. Due Generator - SignalKeysightN5171B-5062-May-182-May-21 Analyzer - Spectrum AnalyzerKeysightN9010A19-Mar-1919-Mar-20 The measurement was made using a direct connection between the RF output of the EUT and a spectrum analyzer. Because the conducted Output Power was measured using a RMS Average detector, the Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR) was measured to show that the maximum peak-max-hold spectrum to the maximum of the average spectrum does not exceed 13 dB. The PAPR measurement method is described in ANSI C63.26 section 5.2.3.4. The PAPR was measured using the CCDF function of the spectrum analyzer. Report No. NOKI0004.1135/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 EUT:AHLBBA RRHWork Order:NOKI0004 Serial Number:K9193514835Date: Customer:Nokia Solutions and NetworksTemperature:22.4 °C Attendees:John RattanavongHumidity:29.6% RH Project:NoneBarometric Pres.:1019 mbar Tested by:Jonathan KieferPower:54VDCJob Site:TX09 TEST SPECIFICATIONSTest Method COMMENTS DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD Signature PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results Band 14 256QAM Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz Antenna Port 17.6813Pass Antenna Port 26.7813Pass Antenna Port 36.7913Pass Antenna Port 47.7113Pass PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) 18-Nov-19 Configuration #2 FCC 90I:2019ANSI C63.26:2015 None Band 14 PAPR measurements for LTE5 channel bandwidth at Mid channel using 256QAM on all four antenna ports. EUT is operated at 100% duty cycle. Report No. NOKI0004.1136/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results 7.6813Pass PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results 6.7813Pass PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) Band 14, 256QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz, Antenna Port 1 Band 14, 256QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz, Antenna Port 2 Report No. NOKI0004.1137/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results 6.7913Pass PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results 7.7113Pass PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) Band 14, 256QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz, Antenna Port 3 Band 14, 256QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz, Antenna Port 4 Report No. NOKI0004.1138/574 EMC TEST EQUIPMENT ID TEW AFM TEST DESCRIPTION PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) XMit 2019.09.05 Testing was performed using the mode(s) of operation and configuration(s) noted within the report. The individuals and/or the organization requesting the test provided the modes, configurations and settings used to complete the evaluation. The actual test parameters are specified in the test data, this includes items such as investigated frequency range (scanned) and test levels. The testing methods and performance specifications, as well as the test site used for the evaluation are indicated in the test data. DescriptionManufacturerModelLast Cal.Cal. Due Generator - SignalKeysightN5171B-5062-May-182-May-21 Analyzer - Spectrum AnalyzerKeysightN9010A19-Mar-1919-Mar-20 The measurement was made using a direct connection between the RF output of the EUT and a spectrum analyzer. Because the conducted Output Power was measured using a RMS Average detector, the Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR) was measured to show that the maximum peak-max-hold spectrum to the maximum of the average spectrum does not exceed 13 dB. The PAPR measurement method is described in ANSI C63.26 section 5.2.3.4. The PAPR was measured using the CCDF function of the spectrum analyzer. Report No. NOKI0004.1139/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 EUT:AHLBBA RRHWork Order:NOKI0004 Serial Number:K9193514835Date: Customer:Nokia Solutions and NetworksTemperature:22.4 °C Attendees:John RattanavongHumidity:29.6% RH Project:NoneBarometric Pres.:1019 mbar Tested by:Jonathan KieferPower:54VDCJob Site:TX09 TEST SPECIFICATIONSTest Method COMMENTS DEVIATIONS FROM TEST STANDARD Signature PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results Band 14 QPSK Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz7.6613Pass 16QAM Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz7.6613Pass 64QAM Modulation LTE5 Bandwidth Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz7.6713Pass PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) 18-Nov-19 Configuration #2 FCC 90I:2019ANSI C63.26:2015 None Band 14 PAPR measurements for LTE5 channel bandwidth at Mid channel for four modulationt types. Tested on highest power antenna port (Port 1). EUT is operated at 100% duty cycle. Note 256QAM modulation LTE5 Mid channel data is shown elsewhere in this report. Report No. NOKI0004.1140/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results 7.6613Pass PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results 7.6613Pass PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) Band 14, QPSK Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz Band 14, 16QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz Report No. NOKI0004.1141/574 XMit 2019.09.05 TbtTx 2019.08.30.0XMit 2019.09.05 PAPRLimit Value (dB)(dB)Results 7.6713Pass PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) Band 14, 64QAM Modulation, LTE5 Bandwidth, Mid Channel, 763.0 MHz Report No. NOKI0004.1142/574 EMC TEST EQUIPMENT ID TEW AFM TEST DESCRIPTION PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO (PAPR) XMit 2019.09.05 Testing was performed using the mode(s) of operation and configuration(s) noted within the report. The individuals and/or the organization requesting the test provided t…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

EMC TEST EQUIPMENT ID TEW AFM TEST DESCRIPTION BAND EDGE COMPLIANCE XMit 2019.09.05 Testing was performed using the mode(s) of operation and configuration(s) noted within the report. The individuals and/or the organization requesting the test provided the modes, configurations and settings used to complete the evaluation. The actual test parameters are specified in the test data, this includes items such as investigated frequency range (scanned) and test levels. The testing methods and performance specifications, as well as the test site used for the evaluation are indicated in the test data. DescriptionManufacturerModelLast Cal.Cal. Due Generator - SignalKeysightN5171B-5062-May-182-May-21 Analyzer - Spectrum AnalyzerKeysightN9010A19-Mar-1919-Mar-20 The measurement was made using a direct connection between the RF output of the EUT and a spectrum analyzer. The spurious RF conducted emissions at the edges of the authorized bands were measured with the EUT set to low and high transmit frequencies in the available band. The channels closest to the band edges were selected. The EUT was transmitting at the data rate(s) listed in the datasheet. For Multiband operation, measurements were taken at the lower band edge of the lower band and the upper band edge of the upper band. The spectrum was scanned below the lower band edge and above the higher band edge. All limits were adjusted by a factor of [-10*log((N)] to account for the device operation as a N port MIMO transmitter, as per FCC KDB 622911. For Bands 12 and 14, the adjustment factor is -10*log(4) = -6 dB. The Bands 12 and 14 adjusted limit is -19 dBm. For Band 29, the adjustment factor is -10*log(2) = -3 dB. The Band 29 adjusted limit is -16 dBm. Per FCC section 27.53(g), the power of any emission outside of the authorized operating frequency range cannot exceed -13 dBm. The limit is adjusted to -19 dBm [-13 dBm -10 log (4)] per FCC KDB 662911D01 v02r01 because the RRH may operate as a 4 port MIMO transmitter for Band 12. FCC 27.53(g) requi…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.