FCCID.CO- FCC ID Database
HomeCompaniesEquipment ClassesSearch

Β© 2026 FCC ID Database. All rights reserved.

AboutContactData sourced from FCC public records
  1. Home/
  2. Ademco Inc./
  3. CFS8DLLYNXREN-4

CFS8DLLYNXREN-4Alarm Keypad

Ademco Inc.
Alarm Keypad - FCC ID CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 - Ademco Inc.
Click to zoom

Application Details

Equipment Class
DSR - Part 15 Remote Control/Security Device Transceiver
Date of Grant
Feb 20, 2006
Application Purpose
Original Equipment
Date of Application
Feb 20, 2006
Equipment Note
Alarm Keypad
Frequency Range
345.00000000 - 345.00000000
Company
Ademco Inc.
Country
United States

Documents & Files

Select a file to view

Users Manual

β†—

Block Diagram

β†—

Cover Letter(s)

β†—
β†—
β†—

External Photos

β†—
β†—

ID Label/Location Info

β†—

Internal Photos

β†—
β†—
β†—
β†—

Operational Description

β†—
β†—
β†—
β†—

Schematics

β†—

Test Report

β†—
β†—
β†—
β†—
β†—
β†—

Test Setup Photos

β†—
β†—

Document Text

Text extracted from the exhibit documents filed with the FCC. Open a document above to read the original.

Users Manual

ADEMCO LYNXR Series Security Systems LYNXR/LYNXR24 and LYNXR-EN Installation and Setup Guide AWAY OFF STAY AUX LIGHTSON RECORD LIGHTSOFF STATUS TEST VOLUME CODE NODELAY BYPASS PLAY CHIME FUNCTION DELETE ESCAPE ADD SELECT ARMED READY 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 # 1 2 3 K5963V3 5/04 Rev. A –57– Regulatory Agency Statements UL NOTICE: This is a "Grade A" residential system. FCC STATEMENT THIS DEVICE COMPLIES WITH PART 15 OF FCC RULES. OPERATION IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TWO CONDITIONS: (1) THIS DEVICE MAY NOT CAUSE HARMFUL INTERFERENCE, AND (2) THIS DEVICE MUST ACCEPT ANY INTERFERENCE RECEIVED, INCLUDING INTERFERENCE THAT MAY CAUSE UNDESIRED OPERATION. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Part 15 Statement This equipment has been tested to FCC requirements and has been found acceptable for use. The FCC requires the following statement for your information: This equipment generates and uses radio frequency energy and if not installed and used properly, that is, in strict accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, may cause interference to radio and television reception. It has been type tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B computing device in accordance with the specifications in Part 15 of FCC Rules, which are designed to provide reasonable protection against such interference in a residential installation. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: β€’ If using an indoor antenna, have a quality outdoor antenna installed. β€’ Reorient the receiving antenna until interference is reduced or eliminated. β€’ Move the radio or television receiver away from the receiver/control. β€’ Move the antenna leads away from any wire runs to the receiver/control. β€’ Plug the receiver/control into a different outlet so that it and the radio or television receiver are on different branch circuits. If necessary, the user should consult the dealer or an experienced radio/television technician for additional suggestions. The user or installer may find the following booklet prepared by the Federal Communications Commission helpful: "Interference Handbook." This booklet is available from the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The user shall not make any changes or modifications to the equipment unless authorized by the Installation Instructions or User's Manual. Unauthorized changes or modifications could void the user's authority to operate the equipment. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Part 68 This equipment complies with Part 68 of the FCC rules. On the front cover of this equipment is a label that contains the FCC registration number and Ringer Equivalence Number (REN). You must provide this information to the telephone company when requested. This equipment uses the following USOC jack: RJ31X This equipment may not be used on telephone-company-provided coin service. Connection to party lines is subject to state tariffs. This equipment is hearing-aid compatible. Industry Canada NOTICE: The Industry Canada Label identifies certified equipment. This certification means that the equipment meets telecommunications network protective, operational and safety requirements as prescribed in the appropriate Terminal Equipment Technical Requirements document(s). The Department does not guarantee the equipment will operate to the user’s satisfaction. Before installing this equipment, users should ensure that it is permissible to be connected to the facilities of the local telecommunications company. The equipment must also be installed using an acceptable method of connection. The customer should be aware that compliance with the above conditions may not prevent degradation of service in some situations. Repairs to certified equipment should be coordinated by a representative designated by the supplier. Any repairs or alterations made by the user to this equipment, or equipment malfunctions, may give the telecommunications company to request the user to disconnect the equipment. Users should ensure for their own protection that the electrical ground connections of the power utility, telephone lines and internal metallic water pipe system, if present, are connected together, This precaution may be particularly important in rural areas. Caution: Users should not attempt to make such connections themselves but should contact appropriate electric inspection authority, or electrician, as appropriate. Ringer Equivalence Number Notice: The Ringer Equivalence Number (REN) assigned to each terminal device provides an indication of the maximum number of terminals allowed to be connected to a telephone interface. The termination on an interface may consist of any combination of devices subject only to the requirement that the sum of the Ringer Equivalence Numbers of all the devices does not exceed 5.

Cover Letter(s)

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 February 13, 2006 RE: Honeywell FCC ID: CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) Please provide the 731 form per our previous discussion. 2) The block diagram should show the frequencies of all oscillators in the TX portion of the device (CFR 2.1033(a)(5)), unless this portion of the device is an OEM part from a different manufacturer. Please provide either the block diagram for the TX portion, or alternatively provide a parts list that shows that this part is provided by another manufacturer. Please update the list of confidential exhibits if necessary. 3) Please provide top and bottom photos of all boards within the device. The back of one board does not appear to have been provided (external interface board). 4) It appears that also the TX circuitry may actually be contained on a small daughter board, but can not fully be determined from photos provided. If so, please provide close up top/bottom photos of this board before it is integrated onto the main board. 5) FCC desires actual test photographs and not simply a test diagram. Please provide test configuration photographs on the test site if available. 6) Confidentiality has not been requested for items such as schematics, block diagram, operational description. Please clarify if this is requested, and if so, please provide an appropriate cover letter requesting this. 7) The OAT’s facility does not appear to be currently listed on the FCC site. Please explain. z Page 2 February 13, 2006 8) Test report references ANSI C63-4 – 1992. Please note that the FCC rules now only reference ANSI C63.4 – 2003 edition. Please ensure testing is in compliance with this version and correct exhibits as necessary. Note that for many measurements, this version now requires VBW must be 3*RBW. 9) FYI....Reading at 2760 MHz appears to fall in a restricted band and therefore the incorrect limits were applied. However it still meets restricted band limits. 10) Please explain section 5-5. All measurements appear to be the same value. 11) All measurements (spurious and digital device) appear to be reported for Horizontal polarity only. It is highly unusual for all spurious to occur worse case in the same orientation. Were emissions also measured for Vertical polarity? 12) How is this device powered. If it receives power from AC, or from another device that receives AC, or by and AC to DC connection, then AC powerline emissions testing per 15.207 should also be provided. 13) It can not be determined if all ports of the device were adequately filled per ANSI C63.4. Please explain. 14) Please explain applicability or compliance of 15.231(a)(3). 15) Please explain applicability or compliance of 15.231(a)(5). 16) The device appears to use 3 modes of signaling. 1) Alarm, 2) Keypad-control signals, 3) confirmation forwarding signals from remotes. While timing information was supplied, it is uncertain if it applies to all modes of signaling, or if any additional modes also exist. Please explain any additional modes of signaling as well as provide information for compliance to 15.231 (a)(4) or 15.231(a)(1)/(2) as applicable for each mode. 17) Are all signaling types/packets meet the same timing requirements as shown. Please explain. For IC 18) Please provide an appropriate ATCB IC form in order to continue with the review process for IC, including proper REL and RSS-102 attestations. See attached. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Cover Letter(s)

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 February 14, 2006 RE: Honeywell FCC ID: CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The last response did not appear to address the previous confidentiality comment. Confidentiality has not been requested for items such as schematics, block diagram, operational description. Please clarify if this is requested, and if so, please provide an appropriate cover letter requesting this. 2) It doesn’t appear that revised block diagram given in the response for previous item 2 was received. Please provide. 3) Per our conversation, please confirm that this device does not contain any supervisory capability that needs to be explained under 15.231. Also, please confirm if there are any different size/length transmissions during installation that may exceed 5 second durations. 4) FYI....In the future, please provide close up test configuration photographs such that positioning of the EUT can be seen as well as antenna distances used. For example: 5) FYI....In the future, please provide test configuration photos for conducted photographs as well. 6) FYI....In the future and to abide by our quality control procedures, please upload all responses to the website (exhibits and written response). 7) FYI....Currently the updated site listing has not been shown. We will continue to monitor, but until this listing shows we will not be able to finalize the FCC grants. 8) FYI....Section 5-1 of the report also shows ANSI C63.4 – 1992. Please correct in the future. z Page 2 February 14, 2006 For IC 9) Please provide an appropriate ATCB IC form in order to continue with the review process for IC, including proper REL and RSS-102 attestations. See attached previously provided. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Cover Letter(s)

Tim, You wrote: >The block diagram should show the frequencies of all oscillators >in the TX portion of the device (CFR 2.1033(a)(5)), unless this portion >of the device is an OEM part from a different manufacturer. Please >provide either the block diagram for the TX portion, or alternatively >provide a parts list that shows that this part is provided by another >manufacturer. Please update the list of confidential exhibits if >necessary. I Reply: PLEASE SEE ALL THE ATTACHED FILES. PLEASE SEE REVISED BLOCK DIAGRAM: EXHIBIT 2-2A >Please provide top and bottom photos of all boards within the device. >The back of one board does not appear to have been provided (external >interface board). It appears that also the TX circuitry may actually be >contained on a small daughter board, but can not fully be determined >from photos provided. If so, please provide close up top/bottom photos >of this board before it is integrated onto the main board. PLEASE SEE REVISED INTERNAL PHOTO: EXHIBIT 4-4A ADDITIONAL CLOSE UP OF THE TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER ON THE MAIN CIRCUIT BOARD, AND FRONT & BACK PHOTOS OF THE DC POWER SUPPLY INTERFACE "DAUGHTER BOARD" >FCC desires actual test photographs and not simply a test diagram. >Please provide test configuration photographs on the test site if >available. PLEASE SEE REVISED TEST PHOTO EXHIBIT 5-2A >The OAT's facility does not appear to be currently listed on the >FCC site. Please explain. Page 2 February 13, 2006 THE OAT'S SITE WAS CURRENT UP UNTIL ONE WEEK AGO WHEN WE SUBMITTED A RENEWAL TO THE FCC I EXPECT A NEW SITE CERTIFICATION LETTER ANY DAY. THE SITE WAS CURRENT WITH THE FCC WHEN THE DATA WAS TAKEN. >Test report references ANSI C63-4 - 1992. Please note that the FCC >rules now only reference ANSI C63.4 - 2003 edition. Please ensure >testing is in compliance with this version and correct exhibits as >necessary. Note that for many measurements, this version now requires >VBW must be 3*RBW. PLEASE SEE REVISED EMISSIONS EXHIBIT 5-3A , THE REFERENCE TO '1992' WAS AN OVERSIGHT, WE ARE TESTING TO ANSI C63.4 - 2003 AND HAVE THE CURRENT HARD AND ELECTRONIC COPY'S IN OUR TEST FACILITY. >FYI....Reading at 2760 MHz appears to fall in a restricted band and >therefore the incorrect limits were applied. However it still meets >restricted band limits. PLEASE SEE REVISED EMISSIONS EXHIBIT 5-3A , AGAIN AN OVERSIGHT THE LIMIT WAS REVISED TO THE RESTRICTED BAND LIMIT. >Please explain section 5-5. All measurements appear to be the same value. EXHIBIT 5-5 IS CORRECT AS SHOWN THIS IS THE NOISE FLOOR OF THE MEASURING EQUIPMENT. THE RECEIVER IS EXTREMELY QUIET. >All measurements (spurious and digital device) appear to be reported >for Horizontal polarity only. It is highly unusual for all spurious >to occur worse case in the same orientation. Were emissions also >measured for Vertical polarity? THIS IS CORRECT, WE USE A ETS BICONOLOG ANTENNA WITH VERY GOOD VERTICAL TO HORIZONTAL ISOLATION. VERTICAL POLARITY READINGS WERE ALSO MADE, BUT WE ONLY REPORTED THE HIGHEST / WORSE CASE - WHICH JUST HAPPENED TO BE ALL HORIZONTAL THIS TIME. WE HAVE HAD OTHER PRODUCTS THAT SHOW ALL VERTICAL WORSE CASE AND SOME WHICH SHOW SOME OF BOTH THIS IS NORMAL WITH OUR PRODUCTS. >How is this device powered. If it receives power from AC, or from >another device that receives AC, or by and AC to DC connection, then >AC power line emissions testing per 15.207 should also be provided. THIS DEVICE IS POWERED BY A 15 VAC WALL TRANSFORMER AND A BACKUP BATTERY. PLEASE SEE EXHIBIT 5-6 'CONDUCTED EMISSIONS' PLEASE NOTE: THIS TEST WAS DONE EARLIER IN THE DEVELOPMENT CYCLE THAN THE FCC TESTING BECAUSE IT WAS DONE BY OUR QC DEPARTMENT AT THE SAME TIME AS UL WAS. >It can not be determined if all ports of the device were adequately >filled per ANSI C63.4. Please explain. ALL PORTS WERE PROPERLY TERMINATED DURING THE CONDUCTED EMISSIONS TESTING BY QC. >The device appears to use 3 modes of signaling. 1) Alarm, 2) Keypad- >control signals, 3) confirmation forwarding signals from remotes. While >timing information was supplied, it is uncertain if it applies to all >modes of signaling, or if any additional modes also exist. Please explain >any additional modes of signaling as well as provide information for >compliance to 15.231 (a)(4) or 15.231(a)(1)/(2) as applicable for each >mode. Please explain applicability or compliance of 15.231(a)(3). >Please explain applicability or compliance of 15.231(a)(5). >Are all signaling types/packets meet the same timing requirements as >shown. Please explain. THERE IS ONLY ONE TYPE OF TRANSMISSION THAT IS USED FOR ALL SIGNALING. THIS WAS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBITS 3-1 AND 3-2. ONLY THE ACTUAL COMBINATION OF DATA BITS VARIES BETWEEN ALARM, CONTROL AND CONFIRMATION SIGNALS. COMPLIANCE TO 15.231 (a)(4) AND / OR 15.231(a)(1)/(2) IS EXPRESSED IN THE DUTY CYCLE CALCULATION, (( 3-1 )) WHERE WE AVAIL OURSELVES OF THE DUTY CYCLE CORRECTION PROVISION. I.E.; 25644.8 uV/M X 15.0% = 3846.7 Uv/M FCC LIMIT: 7292 Uv/M @ 3M WE DO ALL OUR TRANSMISSIONS THIS WAY SO AS TO MAKE THE DUTY CYCLE AS LOW AS PRACTICAL TO THE MAXIMUM FCC ALLOWED CORRECTION OF 10% ALL OF OUR DEVICES ARE MOMENTARY OPERATION DEVICES.

ID Label/Location Info

EXHIBIT 8 FCC PART 15 LABEL CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 SECTION 2.1033 (c) SECTION 2.1033 (c) and Part 15.21 SECTION 2.1033 (c) Label and label location - A photo showing the identification label clearly (you must be able to see the name and FCC ID number), and the location on the device. In lieu of a photo for this, you may submit a engineer’s drawing. Part 15.21 Statement - for all intentional and unintentional radiators is also printed on the label. LYNXR / LYNXR24 /LYNXR-EN ADEMCO A Honeywell Company

Operational Description

EXHIBIT 1 FCC I.D.: CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 Functional Description. The LYNX fixed transceiver is part of Honeywell / Ademco's wireless 5800 alarm system. It is used in conjunction with portable transmitters (e.g. 5804) or portable transceivers (e.g. 5804BD). This allows remote control of the alarm system and provides remote indication that a control instruction has been enacted. In addition control events and alarm events initiated at the Lynx keypad are also transmitted to wireless relay and wireless siren type devices. These messages are transmitted at 345Mhz +/-82kHz using on-off keyed AM modulation. The LYNX does not send a regular supervision or check-in message, it sends no other messages except alarm messages, control messages initiated at the Lynx keypad, and messages which are a confirmation of reception of manually initiated control messages which have been received from portable remote control transmitters.

Operational Description

EXHIBIT 2-1 FCC ID: CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 Circuit Description. The LYNXREN-4 is the latest version of the LYNXREN. Like the CFS8DLLYNXREN-1, 2, and 3 it is constructed on a pair of PCBs interconnected via a ribbon cable. The main difference is a change to the battery charger and a interfacing circuit the RF copper and RF circuit are identical, but the PC Board went through a re-layout.The main PCB contains the RF transmitter and receiver circuitry as well as all control, display, keypad and annunciation circuitry. The transmitter is a SAW resonator Colpitts oscillator, Q26, YL5, etc. The transmitter is on-off keyed (AM) modulated by a control signal from the micro controller U18 which turns PA Q30 on or off via Q28/Q29, thus modulating the output signal. The RF output signal is connected to two PCB mounted antennas via FL1 & diodes CR32/CR33. The receiver is a β€˜superhet’ with a single intermediate frequency at 10.7MHz. Q31 etc. is the low noise amplifier which is connected to the PCB mounted antennas. Diodes CR32/CR33 under the control of a micro controller are periodically switched to provide system antenna diversity. The IC U22 includes a balanced mixer, & phase locked L.O. (YL1 @ 10.446875 Mhz X 34 = 355.7 Mhz) which converts the incoming signal down from 345MHz to 10.7MHz. This IC also includes the required IF gain and detected output. FL3 is a ceramic IF filter. IC U19 performs baseband filtering and processing and provides a data signal.

Operational Description

EXHIBIT 3-1 CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 Message Protocol, Timing, and Duty Cycle Calculation The data output is phase encoded Manchester which has an inherent 50% duty cycle. The transmitted data rate is 3.95 KBS +/- 0.5% i.e. each bit is 253.1 uS. in duration typical and 254.3 uS. max. The worst case data format consists of 120 bits. The duration of each word is 30.51 mS. Each word is transmitted 6 times at each transmission event, The words are separated (start to start) by 102 mS. The total transmission time at eack transmission event is 540.51 mS. The duty cycle over a 100 mS. Measuring period is calculated as follows: Duty Cycle = Actual RF Transmission ON time / 100 mS. Actual RF Transmission ON time = 120 bits X 50% X 254.3 uS. = 15.26 mS. Therefore the Duty Cycle = 15.26 mS. / 100 mS. = 15.26 %

Test Report

EXHIBIT 5-1 CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 Report of Measurements. Measurements were made at Honeywells Measurement Facility at 160 Eileen Way , Syosset , NY 11791 , FCC Registration number : 90421. Measurements were made in accordance with the procedures and reporting requirements of ANSI C63.4-1992. The Test Set-Up (C63.4 section 10.1.3) is shown in the attached drawing. The sequence of testing (C63.4 section 10.1.7) for radiated emissions is as follows: A preliminary scan was conducted with the receiver antenna close to the EUT in order to identify the emission characteristics of the EUT (C63.4 section 8.3.1.1). The antenna and EUT were then placed at the proper separation with the EUT positioned on a non-conducting turntable. The EUT was rotated on the turntable to maximize the received signal strength, then the receiver antenna height was varied to further maximize the received reading. Thereafter, the device was again rotated to a peak output position and the antenna height was re-adjusted for maximum received signal. This procedure was re-iterated until there was no further increase in signal level. This procedure was performed with the EUT rotating in three orthogonal planes (C63.4 section 13.1.4.1) to generate a final maximum reading which is recorded on the radiated emissions result sheet. Similar measurements were made on the receiver to ensure compliance as an unintentional radiator. See Exhibit 6 for list of test equipment (C63.4 section 10.1.4). Note, Spectrum Analyzer resolution bandwidths set as follows; (Video Bandwidth set greater than RBW) - For occupied bandwidth measurements, RBW = 100kHz, (This is in accordance with the minimum RBW allowed by C63.4, which requires RBW greater than 5% of the FCC required occupied bandwidth spec of 0.25% of center frequency). - For radiated emissions below 1 GHz, the RBW = 100kHz. Detector function set to peak. - For radiated emissions above 1 GHz, the RBW = 1MHz. Detector function set to peak. OCCUPIED BANDWIDTH is shown on attached plot. RADIATED EMISSIONS are recorded on attached sheet.

Test Report

HONEYWELL SECURITY & CUSTOM ELECTRONICS 165 EILEEN WA Y SYOSSET, NY 11791EXHIBIT 5-3 FCC ID # CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 Date : 6/30/2005 Tested by :Y. Mohammed Approved by :K.Addy Test Sample (model) : LYNXR-EN_ver13.1 Test method: ANSI C63.4 - 2003 Test specification: FCC Part 15, Sub-part C Notes: (1) Fo = 345MHz. (2) Detector = Peak (3) Frequency range scanned to 4 GHz. Emissions not reported were more than 20dB below the specified unit. [(Meter reading + Cable/Amp factor + Antenna factor) / 20 )] (4) Conv. Reading = 10 (5) Corr. Reading = Conv. Reading X Duty Cycle (6) Six Highest Emissions Recorded Freq. (MHz) Antenna Polarity (V/H) Meter Reading (dB uV) Cable/Amp Factor (dB) Antenna Factor (dB/M) Conv. Reading (uV/M) Duty Cycle (%) Corr. Reading (uV/M) Limit @ 3M (uV/M) 30 CABLE "A"BICONILOG729 345H72.201.214.7825644.815.0%3846.77292 690H36.001.819.10699.815.0%105.0729 1035H31.002.222.70623.715.0%93.6500 1380H30.002.524.96746.415.0%112.0500 1725H25.002.827.55585.515.0%87.8729 2070H25.003.029.52751.615.0%112.7729 2415H25.003.331.13936.515.0%140.5729 2760 H 25.003.7 31.501023.315.0%153.5 500 3105H25.004.131.611085.215.0%162.8729 3450H25.004.432.221205.015.0%180.8729 4000 CABLE "A"BICONILOG

Test Report

LYNXR-EN ver13.1 OCCUPIED BANDWIDTH (429 KHz)

Test Report

EXHIBIT 5-5 CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 Section 15.231 (Periodic operation above 70 MHz.) In addition to the provisions of Section 15.205, the field strength of emissions from intentional radiators operated under this Section shall not exceed the following: Frequency Fundamental Spurious (MHz) (microvolts/meter) (microvolts/meter) 260 - 470 3,750 to 12,500 ** 375 to 1,250 ** NOTE: ** linear interpolations NOTES: (1) The above field strength limits are specified at a distance of 3 meters. The tighter limits apply at the band edges. (2) Intentional radiators operating under the provisions of this Section shall demonstrate compliance with the limits on the field strength of emissions, as shown in the above table, based on the average value of the measured emissions. As an alternative, compliance with the limits in the above table may be based on the use of measurement instrumentation with a CISPR quasi-peak detector. The specific method of measurement employed shall be specified in the application for equipment authorization. If average emission measurements are employed, the provisions in Section 15.35 for averaging pulsed emissions and for limiting peak emissions apply. Further, compliance with the provisions of Section 15.205 shall be demonstrated using the measurement instrumentation specified in that section. (3) The limits on the field strength of the spurious emissions in the above table are based on the fundamental frequency of the intentional radiator. Spurious emissions shall be attenuated to the average (or, alternatively, CISPR quasi-peak) limits shown in this table or to the general limits shown in Section 15.209, whichever limit permits a higher field strength. (4) Fo = 345MHz.LO = 334.3MHz(345-10.7 ) Crystal frequency = 20.89375 (5) Detector = Peak (6) Frequency range scanned to 4 GHz. (Emissions not reported were more than 20dB below the specified limit). [(Meter reading + Cable/Amp factor + Antenna factor) / 20 )] (7) Conv. Reading = 10 (8) Corr. Reading = Conv. Reading X Duty Cycle (9) Date : 5/10/2005 Tested by :Y. Mohammed Approved by : Ken Addy Freq. (MHz) Antenna Polarity (V/H) Meter Reading (dB uV) Cable/Amp Factor (dB) Antenna Factor (dB/M) Conv. Reading (uV/M) Duty Cycle (%) Corr. Reading (uV/M) Limit @ 3M (uV/M) CABLE "A"BICONOLOG 20.89375H25.000.009.1050.7100.0%50.7100 41.78750H25.000.309.2053.1100.0%53.1150 62.68125H25.000.409.4155.0100.0%55.0150 83.57500H25.000.5010.1060.3100.0%60.3150 104.46875H25.000.7110.3663.6100.0%63.6200 125.36250H25.000.7512.4281.0100.0%81.0200 146.25625H25.000.8013.3991.1100.0%91.1200 167.15000H25.00 0.86 13.4492.3100.0%92.3200 188.04375H25.000.9011.5574.6100.0%74.6200 208.93750H25.001.0011.6376.1100.0%76.1200 229.83125H25.001.0511.9779.6100.0%79.6200 250.72500H25.001.1012.0380.6100.0%80.6200 271.61875H25.001.1212.8088.3100.0%88.3200 292.51250H25.001.1313.3293.9100.0%93.9200 313.40625H25.001.1513.6297.4100.0%97.4200 334.30000H25.001.1214.1102.6100.0%102.6200 355.19375H25.001.3015.06116.9100.0%116.9200 376.08750H25.001.3515.93130.0100.0%130.0200 396.98125H25.001.4016.33136.9100.0%136.9200 417.87500H25.001.4516.45139.6100.0%139.6200 CABLE "A"BICONOLOG 4

Test Report

EXHIBIT 6 TEST EQUIPMENT USED CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 Section 15.231 and ANSI C63.4 Section 15.231, per C63.4 section 10.1.4. This is a list of all test equipment used. Test Equipment list 1. Antenna: BICONOLOG S/N: 00029290 Cal. on: 09/14/04 Cal. due: 09/14/05 2. Spectrum Analyzer H. P. 8563E S/N:3246A00232 Cal. on: 08/23/04 Cal. due: 08/23/05

Test Setup Photos

EXHIBIT 5-2 PICTURE OF THE TEST SETUP CFS8DLLYNXREN-4 SECTION 2.1093 (c) SECTION 2.1093 (c) Photo of the test setup shall be provided.

Contact Information

Applicant

Christian Fouth(Sr. Wireless Certification Engineer)
[email protected]15406566372Fax: 17639544816

Technical Contact

Honeywell International Inc.Ken Addy
[email protected]516 921 6704

165 Eileen Way Β· Syosset, New York Β· United States

Test Firm

Honeywell International Inc.Kenneth Addy
[email protected]516-921-6704Fax: 516-921-7182

Technical Specifications

#Rule PartsFrequency RangePower Output
115.231345 MHz - 345 MHz-

Other Applications from Ademco Inc.

Wireless Alarm Transmitter - FCC ID CFS8DL5800MINIV - Resideo LLC.
CFS8DL5800MINIV

Wireless Alarm Transmitter

Jan 28, 2026

Equipment Class

DXX - Part 15 Low Power Communication Device Transmitter
Wireless Alarm Transmitter - FCC ID CFS8DLWTS800 - Resideo LLC.
CFS8DLWTS800

Wireless Alarm Transmitter

Jan 12, 2026

Equipment Class

DTS - Digital Transmission System
CFS8DLCAMWEWI1

VX5 HD Indoor Camera

Jul 25, 2024

Equipment Class

DTS - Digital Transmission System
VX3 HD Outdoor Camera - FCC ID CFS8DLCAMWEWO1 - Ademco Inc.
CFS8DLCAMWEWO1

VX3 HD Outdoor Camera

Sep 17, 2023

Equipment Class

NII - Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure TX
Wireless door/window contact - FCC ID CFS8DLLMD500A - Ademco Inc.
CFS8DLLMD500A

Wireless door/window contact

Jul 20, 2023

Equipment Class

DTS - Digital Transmission System