ISEIFTInfant ID Tag Transmitter

Page 1 ELECTRONICS TEST CENTRE MPB Technologies Inc. 302 Legget Drive Unit 100 Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y5 CANADA FAX:(613)-599-7614 Tel:(613)-599-6800 Date: April 13, 1998 Total Number of pages(including this page) Nombre total de pages(incluant cette page) 1 A / To Nom / Name:Martin Dykstra Compagnie / Company:Contract Administrator Endroit / Location:Hymus Fax:514-694-0776 De / From Nom / Name:Teri Murphy Titre/ TitleAdministrative / Marketing Assistant Message As per your request, here is a list of our printers: QMS -PS410 HP 92275A 92.99 HP Laser 5L HP C3906A 85.99** HP DeskJet 1600 HP 51640C 33.99 HP 51640Y 33.99 HP 51640M 33.99 HP 51645A 40.99** Brother 1270 Plain Paper Fax Brother PC 201 34.99** ** These should be added to the National Contract with Grand & Toy. I don’t see them on my copy, dated December 19, 1997. Hope this helps. The prices are from Grand & Toy. Should you require further information, please call me.

Test Report Prepared By: Electronics Test Centre MPB Technologies Inc. 302 Legget Drive, Suite 100 Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y5 MPBT Report No.: I4-R-1835Customer No.: 710860 Test Report for FCC Part 15.231:1996 Testing of the Instantel Infant Tag Test Personnel: D.Raynes Prepared for: Instantel 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 _________________________ Client Acceptance Authorized Signatory July 6, 1998 I4-R-1835 _________________________ Daniele Zanette Laboratory Supervisor Electromagnetics Measurement Facility Authorized Signatory TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 SCOPE 3 1.2 APPLICANT 3 1.3 APPLICABILITY 3 1.4 TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3 1.5 GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS 3 1.6 SCOPE OF TESTING 3 1.6.1 VARIATIONS IN TEST METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 TEST CONCLUSION 5 2.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS 7 2.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS 8 3.0 TEST FACILITY 9 3.1 LOCATION 9 3.2 GROUNDING PLAN 9 3.3 POWER 9 3.4 EMISSIONS PROFILE 9 3.5 TEST CONFIGURATION 10 4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT 11 4.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS 11 4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS 11 4.3 EMI SPECTRUM ANALYZER AND RECEIVER 11 4.3.1Spectrum Analyzer 11 4.3.2Receiver 12 APPENDICES Appendix A: Instantel Infant Tag Appendix B: Test Report Data Sheets Appendix C: Test Equipment Report Appendix D: Photographs 1.0INTRODUCTION 1.1SCOPE The purpose of this report is to present the findings and results of compliance testing performed, against FCC Part 15.231:1996. 1.2APPLICANT This test report has been prepared for: Instantel Inc. 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 1.3APPLICABILITY All test procedures, limits, and results defined in this document apply to the Instantel Infant Tag unit, which shall be referred to herein as the Equipment Under Test ( EUT ). The results contained in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. This report does not imply product endorsement by NVLAP or the Canadian or US governments. 1.4TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION The test sample, provided for testing by Instantel Inc., was an Infant Tag. Product Type:Battery powered microprocessor controlled RF transmitter Serial Number: Model Number:PIC16LC558 Cables:N/A Power Requirements: Battery Powered 3 Volt lithium button cell. Peripheral Equipment: Detects signals from Instantel “Portal Exciter” The Infant Tag is used as part of the Instantel Infant Protection System designed to ensure that infants in hospital maternity wards are not abducted. 1.5GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS The EUT was setup and exercised using the configurations, modes of operation and arrangements defined in this report only. All inputs and outputs to and from other equipment associated with the EUT were adequately simulated. Where relevant, the EUT was only tested using the monitoring methods and test criteria defined in this report. All testing, unless otherwise noted, was performed under the following environmental conditions Temperature:17 to 23 °C Humidity:45 to 75 % Barometric Pressure:68 to 106 kPa 1.6SCOPE OF TESTING Tests were performed in accordance with CFR 47 FCC Part 15.231 1996. 1.6.1 VARIATIONS IN TEST METHODS There were no variations from the test procedures outlined above. 1.6.2 TEST SAMPLE MODIFICATIONS There were no equipment modifications during test performance. 2.0TEST CONCLUSION The EUT was subjected to the following Electromagnetic Interference tests. Compliance status is designated by a PASS or FAIL . The following table summarizes the test results and details the tests performed in terms of the specification and class or level applied, the unique test sample identification, and the EUT modification state, the mode of operation, configuration and cable arrangement (if applicable). Summary Chart Test Case Test TypeSpecificationClass/ Level Test Sample Mod. State Config.ENG. / QUAL. Result 2.1Radiated Emissions CFR 47 FCC Part 15.231 1996 15.231bInfant Tag NoneNormalQual. Marginal PASS 2.2Conducted Emissions CFR 47 FCC Part 15/18: 1996 N/AN/ANoneN/AN/A Not Tested Test Results are traceable to NIST and NRC MARGINAL MEASUREMENTS Marginal measurements were recorded during testing. These observations are recorded on the attached test report data sheets and noted on the individual test summary. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY The following measurement uncertainty with 95% confidence level was calculated using the methods defined in North American standard NAMAS document NIS81: May 1994. For Radiated E-Field Emissions Frequency= + 1x10 -3 MHz Amplitude= + 4.01 dB For Conducted Emissions Frequency= + 1x10 -3 MHz Amplitude= + 3.25 dB TEST SET UP The photographs in Appendix D show the set up with maximized emission levels for each test. 2.1RADIATED EMISSIONS Test Summary Test Lab: Electronics Test Centre, Kanata Test Personnel: D.Raynes Test Date: July 6, 1998 Product: Instantel Infant Tag Test Description Objectives/CriteriaSpecifications The Radiated E-Field emissions proliferated by a system or sub-system, measured at a distance of 3m from the EUT, shall not exceed the limits for FCC Part 15.231 specifications as stated. Emission levels should meet the requirements with a margin of 6dB. FCC Part 15:1996 30 MHz to 1 GHz Measurement Distance 3 m Radiated Emissions Limits dBμV/m Frequency MHz Fundamental Spurious 40.66-40.70 67 47 70-130 61.9 41.9 130-17461.9-71.5 41.9-51.5 174-260 71.5 51.5 260-470 71.5-81.9 51.5-61.9 >470 81.9 61.9 Using a CISPR Quasi-Peak Adapter Test Result Marginal PASS* Comments Vertical: Horizontal: 217 MHz 54.0 dBμV/m 217 MHz 70.2 dBμV/m * 217 MHz 37.2 dBμV/m 217 MHz 69.6 dBμV/m * 160 MHz 36.0 dBμV/m 109.97 MHz 34.2 dBμV/m 79.99 MHz 34.5 dBμV/m 169.96 MHz 33.4 dBμV/m 179.97 MHz 29.2 dBμV/m 129.99 MHz 29.9 dBμV/m 109.97 MHz 29.5 dBμV/m 159.96 MHz 28.9 dBμV/m Refer to Test Report Data sheets in appendix B 2.2BANDWIDTH Test Summary Test Lab: Electronics Test Centre, Kanata Test Personnel: D.Raynes Test Date: July 6, 1998 Product: Instantel Infant Tag Test …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

EUT Description to be provided by The CLIENT Appendix B TEST REPORT DATA SHEETS OATS Verification OATS Verification Pre Scan Horizontal Polarization Pre Scan Horizontal Polarization Pre Scan Vertical Polarization

MPB Technologies Inc. I4R1835 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. Pra Scan Vertical Polarization Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 2 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. Data Log Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 3 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. Data Log Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 4 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. Appendix C TEST EQUIPMENT REPORT Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 5 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 6 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. Appendix D PHOTOGRAPHS

MPB Technologies Inc. I4R1835 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. Test Report Prepared By: Electronics Test Centre MPB Technologies Inc. 302 Legget Drive, Suite 100 Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y5 MPBT Report No.: I4-R-1835Customer No.: 710860 Test Report for FCC Part 15.231:1996 Testing of the Instantel Infant Tag Test Personnel: D.Raynes Prepared for: Instantel 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 _________________________ Client Acceptance Authorized Signatory July 6, 1998 I4-R-1835 _________________________ Daniele Zanette Laboratory Supervisor Electromagnetics Measurement Facility Authorized Signatory Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 2 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 SCOPE.................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 APPLICANT ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 APPLICABILITY................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 3 1.5 GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS.................................................. 3 1.6 SCOPE OF TESTING .......................................................................................................... 3 1.6.1 VARIATIONS IN TEST METHODS................................................................. 4 2.0 TEST CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 7 2.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS................................................................................................ 8 3.0 TEST FACILITY................................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 LOCATION .......................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 GROUNDING PLAN........................................................................................................... 9 3.3 POWER ................................................................................................................................ 9 3.4 EMISSIONS PROFILE ........................................................................................................ 9 3.5 TEST CONFIGURATION ................................................................................................... 10 4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT........................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 11 4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS................................................................................................ 11 4.3 EMI SPECTRUM ANALYZER AND RECEIVER............................................................. 11 4.3.1Spectrum Analyzer ......................................................................................... 11 4.3.2Receiver........................................................................................................... 12 APPENDICES Appendix A: Instantel Infant Tag Appendix B: Test Report Data Sheets Appendix C: Test Equipment Report Appendix D: Photographs Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 3 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. 1.0INTRODUCTION 1.1SCOPE The purpose of this report is to present the findings and results of compliance testing performed, against FCC Part 15.231:1996. 1.2APPLICANT This test report has been prepared for: Instantel Inc. 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 1.3APPLICABILITY All test procedures, limits, and results defined in this document apply to the Instantel Infant Tag unit, which shall be referred to herein as the Equipment Under Test ( EUT ). The results contained in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. This report does not imply product endorsement by NVLAP or the Canadian or US governments. 1.4TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION The test sample, provided for testing by Instantel Inc., was an Infant Tag. Product Type:Battery powered microprocessor controlled RF transmitter Serial Number: Model Number:PIC16LC558 Cables:N/A Power Requirements: Battery Powered 3 Volt lithium button cell. Peripheral Equipment: Detects signals from Instantel “Portal Exciter” The Infant Tag is used as part of the Instantel Infant Protection System designed to ensure that infants in hospital maternity wards are not abducted. Test Sample: Instantel Infant TagFCC Part 15.231Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.06/07/98 I4R1835 Page 4 of 38 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. 1.5GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS The EUT was setup and exercised using the configurations, modes of operation and arrangements defined in this report only. All inputs and outputs to and from other equipment associated with the EUT were adequately simulated. Where relevant, the EUT was only tested using the monitoring methods and test criteria defined in this report. All testing, unless otherwise n…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Test Report Prepared By: Electronics Test Centre MPB Technologies Inc. 302 Legget Drive, Suite 100 Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y5 MPBT Report No.: I4-R-1835Customer No.: 710860 Test Report for FCC Part 15.231:1996 Testing of the Instantel Infant Tag Test Personnel: D.Raynes Prepared for: Instantel 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 _________________________ Client Acceptance Authorized Signatory July 6, 1998 I4-R-1835 _________________________ Daniele Zanette Laboratory Supervisor Electromagnetics Measurement Facility Authorized Signatory TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 SCOPE 3 1.2 APPLICANT 3 1.3 APPLICABILITY 3 1.4 TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 3 1.5 GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS 3 1.6 SCOPE OF TESTING 3 1.6.1 VARIATIONS IN TEST METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 TEST CONCLUSION 5 2.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS 7 2.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS 8 3.0 TEST FACILITY 9 3.1 LOCATION 9 3.2 GROUNDING PLAN 9 3.3 POWER 9 3.4 EMISSIONS PROFILE 9 3.5 TEST CONFIGURATION 10 4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT 11 4.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS 11 4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS 11 4.3 EMI SPECTRUM ANALYZER AND RECEIVER 11 4.3.1Spectrum Analyzer 11 4.3.2Receiver 12 APPENDICES Appendix A:Instantel Infant Tag Appendix B:Test Report Data Sheets Appendix C:Test Equipment Report Appendix D:Photographs 1.0INTRODUCTION 1.1SCOPE The purpose of this report is to present the findings and results of compliance testing performed, against FCC Part 15.231:1996. 1.2APPLICANT This test report has been prepared for: Instantel Inc. 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 1.3APPLICABILITY All test procedures, limits, and results defined in this document apply to the Instantel Infant Tag unit, which shall be referred to herein as the Equipment Under Test (EUT). The results contained in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. This report does not imply product endorsement by NVLAP or the Canadian or US governments. 1.4TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION The test sample, provided for testing by Instantel Inc., was an Infant Tag. Product Type:Battery powered microprocessor controlled RF transmitter Serial Number: Model Number:PIC16LC558 Cables:N/A Power Requirements: Battery Powered 3 Volt lithium button cell. Peripheral Equipment: Detects signals from Instantel “Portal Exciter” The Infant Tag is used as part of the Instantel Infant Protection System designed to ensure that infants in hospital maternity wards are not abducted. 1.5GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS The EUT was setup and exercised using the configurations, modes of operation and arrangements defined in this report only. All inputs and outputs to and from other equipment associated with the EUT were adequately simulated. Where relevant, the EUT was only tested using the monitoring methods and test criteria defined in this report. All testing, unless otherwise noted, was performed under the following environmental conditions Temperature:17 to 23 °C Humidity:45 to 75 % Barometric Pressure:68 to 106 kPa 1.6SCOPE OF TESTING Tests were performed in accordance with CFR 47 FCC Part 15.231 1996. 1.6.1 VARIATIONS IN TEST METHODS There were no variations from the test procedures outlined above. 1.6.2 TEST SAMPLE MODIFICATIONS There were no equipment modifications during test performance. 2.0TEST CONCLUSION The EUT was subjected to the following Electromagnetic Interference tests. Compliance status is designated by a PASS or FAIL. The following table summarizes the test results and details the tests performed in terms of the specification and class or level applied, the unique test sample identification, and the EUT modification state, the mode of operation, configuration and cable arrangement (if applicable). Summary Chart Test Case Test TypeSpecificationClass/ Level Test Sample Mod. State Config.ENG. / QUAL. Result 2.1Radiated Emissions CFR 47 FCC Part 15.231 1996 15.231bInfant Tag NoneNormalQual. PASS 2.2Conducted Emissions CFR 47 FCC Part 15/18: 1996 N/AN/ANoneN/AN/A Not Tested Test Results are traceable to NIST and NRC MARGINAL MEASUREMENTS Marginal measurements were not recorded during testing. Observations are recorded on the attached test report data sheets and noted on the individual test summary. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY The following measurement uncertainty with 95% confidence level was calculated using the methods defined in North American standard NAMAS document NIS81: May 1994. For Radiated E-Field Emissions Frequency= + 1x10 -3 MHz Amplitude= + 4.01 dB For Conducted Emissions Frequency= + 1x10 -3 MHz Amplitude= + 3.25 dB TEST SET UP The photographs in Appendix D show the set up with maximized emission levels for each test. 2.1RADIATED EMISSIONS Test Summary Test Lab: Electronics Test Centre, Kanata Test Personnel: D.Raynes Test Date: July 6, 1998 Product: Instantel Infant Tag Test Description Objectives/CriteriaSpecifications The Radiated E-Field emissions proliferated by a system or sub-system, measured at a distance of 3m from the EUT, shall not exceed the limits for FCC Part 15.231 specifications as stated. Emission levels should meet the requirements with a margin of 6dB. FCC Part 15:1996 30 MHz to 1 GHz Measurement Distance 3 m Radiated Emissions Limits dBμV/m Frequency MHz Fundamental Spurious 40.66-40.70 60 40 70-130 54.0 34.0 130-17454.0-63.5 34.0-43.5 174-260 63.5 43.5 260-470 63.5-74.0 43.5-54.0 >470 74.0 54.0 Using a CISPR Quasi-Peak Adapter Test Result PASS Comments Vertical: Horizontal: 217 MHz 33.6 dBμV/m (313°) 217 MHz 49.2 dBμV/m (201°) 217 MHz 12.4 dBμV/m (262°) 217 MHz 47.7 dBμV/m (358°) 79.99 MHz 14.7 dBμV/m 109.97 MHz 15.7 dBμV/m 160 MHz 14.5 dBμV/m 169.96 MHz 13.9 dBμV/m 179.97 MHz 10.0 dBμV/m 129.99 MHz 9.9 dBμV/m 109.97 MHz 9.0 dBμV/m 159.96 MHz 9.2 dBμV/m Refer to Test Report Data sheets in appendix B ANSI C63.4 1992 Duty Cycle Calculation: Total Data Train Duration ÷ 100 ms Duty Cycle = 7.54 ms ÷ 100 ms Duty Cycle = 0.0754 (refer to scope plots in data appe…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Test Report Prepared By: Electronics Test Centre MPB Technologies Inc. 302 Legget Drive, Suite 100 Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y5 MPBT Report No.: I4-R-1835Customer No.: 710860 Test Report for FCC Part 15.231:1996 Testing of the Instantel Infant Tag Test Personnel: D.Raynes Prepared for: Instantel 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 _________________________ Client Acceptance Authorized Signatory Revised: November 18, 1998 I4-R-1835 _________________________ Daniele Zanette Laboratory Supervisor Electromagnetics Measurement Facility Authorized Signatory Test Sample: Instantel Infant Tag FCC Part 15.231 Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.18/11/1998 I4R1835 Page 2 of 15 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1.1 SCOPE.................................................................................................................................. 1.2 APPLICANT ........................................................................................................................ 1.3 APPLICABILITY ................................................................................................................ 1.4 TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 1.5 GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS.................................................. 1.6 SCOPE OF TESTING .......................................................................................................... 1.6.1 VARIATIONS IN TEST METHODS................................................................. 2.0 TEST CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 2.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 2.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS................................................................................................ 3.0 TEST FACILITY................................................................................................................................ 3.1 LOCATION.......................................................................................................................... 3.2 GROUNDING PLAN........................................................................................................... 3.3 POWER ................................................................................................................................ 3.4 EMISSIONS PROFILE ........................................................................................................ 3.5 TEST CONFIGURATION ................................................................................................... 4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT........................................................................................................................... 4.1 RADIATED EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 4.2 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS................................................................................................ 4.3 EMI SPECTRUM ANALYZER AND RECEIVER............................................................. 4.3.1Spectrum Analyzer ......................................................................................... 4.3.2Receiver........................................................................................................... APPENDICES Appendix A: Instantel Infant Tag Appendix B: Test Report Data Sheets Appendix C: Test Equipment Report Appendix D: Photographs Test Sample: Instantel Infant Tag FCC Part 15.231 Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.18/11/1998 I4R1835 Page 3 of 15 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. 1.0INTRODUCTION 1.1SCOPE The purpose of this report is to present the findings and results of compliance testing performed, against FCC Part 15.231:1996. 1.2APPLICANT This test report has been prepared for: Instantel Inc. 362 Terry Fox Drive Kanata, ON K2K 2P5 1.3APPLICABILITY All test procedures, limits, and results defined in this document apply to the Instantel Infant Tag unit, which shall be referred to herein as the Equipment Under Test ( EUT ). The results contained in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. This report does not imply product endorsement by NVLAP or the Canadian or US governments. 1.4TEST SAMPLE DESCRIPTION The test sample, provided for testing by Instantel Inc., was an Infant Tag. Product Type:Battery powered microprocessor controlled RF transmitter Serial Number: Model Number:PIC16LC558 Cables:N/A Power Requirements: Battery Powered 3 Volt lithium button cell. Peripheral Equipment: Detects signals from Instantel “Portal Exciter” The Infant Tag is used as part of the Instantel Infant Protection System designed to ensure that infants in hospital maternity wards are not abducted. Test Sample: Instantel Infant Tag FCC Part 15.231 Report No.: I4R1835 MPB Technologies Inc.18/11/1998 I4R1835 Page 4 of 15 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without prior written approval of MPB Technologies Inc. 1.5GENERAL TEST CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS The EUT was setup and exercised using the configurations, modes of operation and arrangements defined in this report only. All inputs and outputs to and from other equipment associated with the EUT were adequately simulated. Where relevant, the EUT was only tested using the monitoring methods and test criteria defined in this report. All testing, unless otherwise noted, was performed under the following environmental conditions Temperature:17 to 23 °C Humidity:45 to 75 % Barometric Pressure:68 to 106 kPa 1.6SCOPE OF TESTING Test…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.