KL7-600MR-V1EchoPoint Reader

Getting Started Guide For EchoPoint SMR-640P-101 MobileReader Savi Technology, Inc. 615 Tasman Dr. Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Copyright © 2001, Savi Technology, Inc. 1 Version 0.6 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 2 II. B ATTERY CHARGING............................................................................................... 3 III. C OMMUNICATION WITH THE PC.............................................................................. 4 IV. USING THE RFID SMR-640P MOBILE READER..................................................... 5 V. USING THE RFID APPLICATION................................................................................ 7 Compliance Notice U.S. Regulatory Approvals EchoPoint MobileReader SMR-640P-101 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Notice The Federal Communications Commission has established technical standards regarding radio frequency energy emitted by computer devices. This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference with radio/TV reception. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense. Changes or modifications to this equipment that are not expressly approved by Savi Technology could void the warranty and the authority to operate this equipment. Savi Technology is not responsible for radio/TV interference caused by using unauthorized cable or by making unauthorized changes to this equipment. This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. International Regulatory Approvals EchoPoint MobileReader SMR-640P-101 Declaration of Conformity 0889 English Hereby, Savi Technology, Inc., declares that this SMR-640P-101 is in compliance with the essential requirements and other relevant provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC. Finnish Savi Technology, Inc. vakuuttaa täten että SMR-640P-101 tyyppinen laite on direktiivin 1999/5/EY oleellisten vaatimusten ja sitä koskevien direktiivin muiden ehtojen mukainen. Hierbij verklaart Savi Technology, Inc.dat het toestel SMR-640P-101 in overeenstemming is met de essentiële eisen en de andere relevante bepalingen van richtlijn 1999/5/EG Dutch Bij deze verklaart Savi Technology, Inc. dat deze SMR-640P-101 voldoet aan de essentiële eisen en aan de overige relevante bepalingen van Richtlijn 1999/5/EC. Par la présente Savi Technology, Inc. déclare que l'appareil SMR-640P-101 est conforme aux exigences essentielles et aux autres dispositions pertinentes de la directive 1999/5/CE French Par la présente, Savi Technology, Inc. déclare que ce SMR-640P-101 est conforme aux exigences essentielles et aux autres dispositions de la directive 1999/5/CE qui lui sont applicables Swedish Härmed intygar Savi Technology, Inc. att denna SMR-640P-101 står I överensstämmelse med de väsentliga egenskapskrav och övriga relevanta bestämmelser som framgår av direktiv 1999/5/EG. Danish Undertegnede Savi Technology, Inc. erklærer herved, at følgende udstyr SMR- 640P-101 overholder de væsentlige krav og øvrige relevante krav i direktiv 1999/5/EF Hiermit erklärt Savi Technology, Inc., dass sich dieser/diese/dieses SMR-640P- 101 in Übereinstimmung mit den grundlegenden Anforderungen und den anderen relevanten Vorschriften der Richtlinie 1999/5/EG befindet". (BMWi) German Hiermit erklärt Savi Technology, Inc. die Übereinstimmung des Gerätes SMR- 640P-101 mit den grundlegenden Anforderungen und den anderen relevanten Festlegungen der Richtlinie 1999/5/EG. (Wien) Copyright © 2001, Savi Technology, Inc. 1 Version 0.6 Greek ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΑ Savi Technology, Inc. ∆ΗΛΩΝΕΙ ΟΤΙ SMR-640P-101 ΣΥΜΜΟΡΦΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΙΣ ΟΥΣΙΩ∆ΕΙΣ ΑΠΑΙΤΗΣΕΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΙΣ ΛΟΙΠΕΣ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΕΣ ∆ΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ Ο∆ΗΓΙΑΣ 1999/5/ΕΚ Italian Con la presente Savi Technology, Inc. dichiara che questo SMR-640P-101 è conforme ai requisiti essenziali ed alle altre disposizioni pertinenti stabilite dalla direttiva 1999/5/CE. Spanish Por medio de la presente Savi Technology, Inc. declara que el SMR-640P-101 cumple con los requisitos esenciales y cualesquiera otras disposiciones aplicables o exigibles de la Directiva 1999/5/CE Portuguese Savi Technology, Inc. declara que este SMR-640P-101 está conforme com os requisitos essenciais e outras disposições da Directiva 1999/5/CE. Copyright © 2001, Savi Technology, Inc. 2 Version 0.6 I. Introduction The EchoPoint SMR-640P-101 MobileReader is a compact, lightweight, attachment unit that can be used with many off the shelf handheld or notebook computer, providing a simple wireless communication with all EchoPoint 600/640 tag product series. The SMR-640P-101 MobileReader includes the following items: • RFID Pod unit with integrated antenna, rechargeable battery and serial cable with standard RS232C, DB-9 connector • Handstrap mounting clip (optional) • AC to DC wall adapter (110/220V) for charging internal reader battery RFID Pod with integrated antenna and rechargeable battery AC to DC wall adapter Standard serial cable for communication to handheld computer Copyright © 2001, Savi Technology, Inc. 3 Version 0.6 II. Battery Charging Before using the SMR-640P-101 MobileReader it is strongly recommended to fully charge the unit’s internal battery. Note that the unit’s internal battery is not user replaceable. To charge the battery use…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Page 1 of 3 RE: Savi Technology FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V1 In response to your comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The users manual should include the information specified in 15.19(a)(3) according to 15.19(a)(5). The “Getting Started Guide” has been updated with the correct verbiage - [“This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.”]. The revised guide has been uploaded to ATCB. 2) The EUT voltage listed for the general Part 15 Radiated emissions (page 5 of 22) states 230 V / 50 Hz. Please note that the FCC requires testing at the rated voltage in the U.S. for this product (120 V / 60 Hz. This was an error in the test data sheet. All radiated emissions tests were performed with the unit powered from an AC voltage of 120V/60Hz and conducted emissions tests were done at both 120V/60Hz and 230V/50Hz. The test data sheets have been updated. 3) Multiple places in the report (page 6 of 17, 8 of 17, 2 of 22 to name but a few) state that the data & control signals were tested again 15.231(e). However the data shows that they were tested against the 15.231(a). Please correct this inconsistency throughout the report. The report and test data have been updated to remove the inconsistency. The updated reports have been uploaded to the ATCB web site. Control signals (Wake-Up and Hello) were both tested against 15.231(a) and the data signals were tested against 15.231(e). 4) It appears that the data/control signals measured were higher than the wakeup signal. Was this expected since the reports states that the wakeup signals was to meet 15.231(a), while the data/control was to meet 15.231(e) - see above? As the Wake-Up signal does not get the benefit of a duty cycle reduction of the pulsed signals, the peak value of this signal is limited to the average limit imposed by 15.231(a) while the pulsed control signals have the peak value and average values limited by the peak and average limits of 15.231(a) respectively. Page 2 of 3 5) The theory of operation provided information with respect to meeting the requirements of 15.231(a) & 15.231(e). In specific please address the following concerns: a) The information is somewhat ambiguous in relation to the hello and sleep transmission. The information supplied shows that this does transmission does not last longer than 5 seconds. However, does this 5 second limitation always exist, no matter how many tags respond (given that only a certain number of responses will occur in the 5 second window? Please explain The Hello & Sleep transactions with responding tags are automatically limited to 5 seconds of transmission. Any tags which are not put to sleep during that time will be flagged in the log of those responding. The operator must initiate a second transaction, also limited to 5 seconds, in order to process such stragglers. Alternatively, an automated command will be initiated over the network. b) Please give an explanation on how long tags usually take to respond given the anti- collision algorithm. Also, what is the anticipated time that the EUT takes between the wake up command and "hello/sleep" transmissions. After receiving the Hello command, tags respond by transmitting their ID in one of up to 255 randomly selected time slots of 57 msec width each. The anti- collision algorithm determines the slot number for each tag based on its ID number and internal clock counter, with a random increment to spread the transaction uniformly over the interval. The average tag response time after receiving a Hello is then half of the interval time. This can range from 28.5 msec up to several seconds. (Note: the duration of the tag ID packet is 9.44 msec.) The duration between the end of the WakeUp transmission and the beginning of the Hello/Sleep transmission is a random delay depending on the anti-collision algorithm. It ranges from about 60 msec to several seconds. c) Earlier versions of the EUT also had additional type of transmissions in the case that some tags do not respond. Please explain if this device has this and if so, please provide detail on this transmission classification, plots, etc. A previous product stated that an Alarm Condition would be declared under the definition of 15.231(a,4) in the event that not all tags responded. Such a condition would permit EUT transmission to re-try until the alarm was cleared. In practice, this mode was not found essential to operation, and was deleted from the current model. 6) FYI, Please note that some of the information in the summary of the radiated field strength on page 4 of 13 for the low frequency test report are located in the incorrect columns and is confusing. The report has been updated to remove the confusion. Page 3 of 3 7) FYI, The data on page 19, 20 & 22 of 22 of the UHF report applied the general limits of 15.209 at some frequencies where the limits of 15.231 could have been applied instead (2603 and 3038 MHz). Thanks – changes have been made to the test data 8) FYI, The correction factor on Note 2, page 21 of 22 was not filled in. This has been filled in and included in the revised report. The updated and new files detailed in the notes above have been uploaded to the ATCB website. The files are: R47499 Revised.pdf R47500 Revised.pdf Getting Started Guide (Revised).doc If you have any further questions, please contact me via [email protected] . Regards Mark Briggs

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 September 30, 2002 RE: Savi Technology FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V1 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The users manual should include the information specified in 15.19(a)(3) according to 15.19(a)(5). 2) The EUT voltage listed for the general Part 15 Radiated emissions (page 5 of 22) states 230 V / 50 Hz. Please note that the FCC requires testing at the rated voltage in the U.S. for this product (120 V / 60 Hz. 3) Multiple places in the report (page 6 of 17, 8 of 17, 2 of 22 to name but a few) state that the data & control signals were tested again 15.231(e). However the data shows that they were tested against the 15.231(a). Please correct this inconsistency throughout the report. 4) It appears that the data/control signals measured were higher than the wakeup signal. Was this expected since the reports states that the wakeup signals was to meet 15.231(a), while the data/control was to meet 15.231(e) - see above? 5) The theory of operation provided information with respect to meeting the requirements of 15.231(a) & 15.231(e). In specific please address the following concerns: a) The information is somewhat ambiguous in relation to the hello and sleep transmission. The information supplied shows that this does transmission does not last longer than 5 seconds. However, does this 5 second limitation always exist, no matter how many tags respond (given that only a certain number of responses will occur in the 5 second window? Please explain b) Please give an explanation on how long tags usually take to respond given the anti-collision algorithm. Also, what is the anticipated time that the EUT takes between the wake up command and "hello/sleep" transmissions. c) Earlier versions of the EUT also had additional type of transmissions in the case that some tags do not respond. Please explain if this device has this and if so, please provide detail on this transmission classification, plots, etc. 6) FYI, Please note that some of the information in the summary of the radiated field strength on page 4 of 13 for the low frequency test report are located in the incorrect columns and is confusing. 7) FYI, The data on page 19, 20 & 22 of 22 of the UHF report applied the general limits of 15.209 at some frequencies where the limits of 15.231 could have been applied instead (2603 and 3038 MHz). 8) FYI, The correction factor on Note 2, page 21 of 22 was not filled in. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

External Photos

TITLE CODE SCALE: N/A SIZE DRAWING No: SHEET 1 OF 1 REV: DATE APPLICATION 860-03865-001 USED ON REVISION RECORD LTR DESCRIPTION DATE A APPROVED DRAWN CHECKED ENGINEER PRODUCTION MATERIAL SUSTAINING PROJECT LEADER DATA CONTROL DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE FILE NAME: 73503871.TCW NEXT ASSEMBLY FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V1 LABEL, FCC ID / CE MARK 6X0P READER 735-03871-001 Savi Technology Sunnyvale CA 94089 5VDC, 300mA A A 615 TASMAN DRIVE SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 94089 0889 NOTES: (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES, ±.015 LABEL SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY A UL APPROVED VENDOR. VENDOR SHALL HAVE A CURRENT SIGNED "PRINTER AGREEMENT" ON FILE WITH UL PER UL MARKING AND LABELING SYSTEMS AND SHALL SUPPLY EACH PACKAGE OR ROLL MARKED WITH COMPANY NAME AND LABEL DESIGNATION PER UL MARKING AND LABELING SYSTEMS. 1. 2. SPECIFICATIONS3. MATERIAL COLOR FONT LAMINATION LABEL DIMENSIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO CLOSEST STANDARD DIE.4. 2.250 0.500 R0.050 EO#2827 INITIAL RELEASE R ORTON05/24/02 APL01 BLACK LETTERS ON WHITE BACKGROUND ARIAL, ARIAL BOLD (CE MARK AND ALERT NOT INCLUDED) 1 MIL MATTE CLEAR POLYESTER FLEXMARK PM-200-W (3 MIL.) POLYESTER WITH V-23 ADHESIVE (1 MIL) 5. CE MARK AND ALERT SYMBOL ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION 735-03938-001.

Internal Photos Battery

File: R47499 Page 1 of 17 Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to FCC Part 15, Subpart C Specifications for an Intentional Radiator and FCC Part 15, Subpart B Specifications for a Receiver on the Savi Technology, Inc. Model: SMR-640P-101 and SMR-640P-110 FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V1 and KL7-600MR-V1 GRANTEE: Savi Technology, Inc. 615 Tasman Drive Sunnyvale, CA. 94089-1707 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: June 7, 2002 FINAL TEST DATE: May 29, 2002, May 31, 2002, June 3, 2002 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ Mark Briggs Director of Engineering This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 16, 2001 File: R47499 Page 2 of 17 Pages TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE..................................................................................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................................................2 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................................................................3 OBJECTIVE...................................................................................................................................................................................3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE..............................................................................................................................................4 EMISSION TEST RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE....................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF RADIATED FIELD STRENGTH - RECEIVER.................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF RADIATED FIELD STRENGTH –INTENTIONAL SIGNAL........................................................................6 BANDWIDTH...........................................................................................................................................................................6 DUTY CYCLE / PERIOD OF OPERATION...........................................................................................................................7 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES....................................................................................................................................7 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS..........................................................................................................................8 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................................................8 ENCLOSURE..............................................................................................................................................................................8 MODIFICATIONS....................................................................................................................................................................8 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........................................................................................................................................................9 EXTERNAL I/O CABLING......................................................................................................................................................9 EUT OPERATION.....................................................................................................................................................................9 TEST SITE....................................................................................................................................................................................10 GENERAL INFORMATION..................................................................................................................................................10 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS..............................................................................................................10 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS..................................................................................................................10 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION................................................................................................................................11 RECEIVER SYSTEM...............................................................................................................................................................11 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER............................................................................................................................11 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN).............................................................................................11 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS...................................................................................................................................................12 ANTENNAS............................................................................................................................................................................12 ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE....................................................................................................12 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION........................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

File: R47500 Page 1 of 13 Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to FCC Part 15, Subpart C Specifications for an Intentional Radiator on the Savi Technology, Inc. Model: SMR-640P-101 FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V1 GRANTEE: Savi Technology, Inc. 615 Tasman Drive Sunnyvale, CA. 94089-1707 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: June 7, 2002 FINAL TEST DATE: May 31, 2002 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ Mark Briggs Director of Engineering This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: June 7, 2002 File: R 47500 Page 2 of 13 Pages TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE..................................................................................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................................................2 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................................................................3 OBJECTIVE...................................................................................................................................................................................3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE..............................................................................................................................................3 EMISSION TEST RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................4 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE....................................................................................................4 LIMITS OF RADIATED INTERFERENCE FIELD STRENGTH.........................................................................................4 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES....................................................................................................................................4 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS..........................................................................................................................5 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................................................5 ENCLOSURE..............................................................................................................................................................................5 MODIFICATIONS....................................................................................................................................................................5 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........................................................................................................................................................6 EXTERNAL I/O CABLING......................................................................................................................................................6 EUT OPERATION.....................................................................................................................................................................6 TEST SITE......................................................................................................................................................................................7 GENERAL INFORMATION....................................................................................................................................................7 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................................................7 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS....................................................................................................................7 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION..................................................................................................................................8 RECEIVER SYSTEM.................................................................................................................................................................8 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER..............................................................................................................................8 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN)...............................................................................................8 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS.....................................................................................................................................................9 ANTENNAS..............................................................................................................................................................................9 ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE......................................................................................................9 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION.............................................................................................................................................9 TEST PROCEDURES.................................................................................................................................................................10 EUT AND CABLE PLACEMENT.........................................................................................................................................10 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS.......................................................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Test Configuration Photos AC Power Port Conducted Emissions Radiated Emissions