FCCID.CO- FCC ID Database
HomeCompaniesEquipment ClassesSearch

© 2026 FCC ID Database. All rights reserved.

AboutContactData sourced from FCC public records
  1. Home/
  2. Savi Technology Inc/
  3. KL7-600MR-V3

KL7-600MR-V3EchoPoint Reader

Savi Technology Inc
EchoPoint Reader - FCC ID KL7-600MR-V3 - Savi Technology Inc
Click to zoom

Application Details

Equipment Class
DCD - Part 15 Low Power Transmitter Below 1705 kHz
Date of Grant
Oct 08, 2002
Application Purpose
Original Equipment
Date of Application
Oct 08, 2002
Equipment Note
EchoPoint Reader
Frequency Range
0.12300000 - 0.12300000
Company
Savi Technology Inc
Country
United States

Documents & Files

Select a file to view

Users Manual

↗

Cover Letter(s)

↗
↗
↗
↗

External Photos

↗

ID Label/Location Info

↗
↗

Internal Photos

↗

Test Report

↗
↗

Test Setup Photos

↗

Document Text

Text extracted from the exhibit documents filed with the FCC. Open a document above to read the original.

Users Manual

Test Configuration Photos AC Power Port Conducted Emissions Radiated Emissions

Cover Letter(s)

Page 1 of 4 RE: Savi Technology FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V3 In response to your comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The users manual should include the information specified in 15.19(a)(3) according to 15.19(a)(5). The “Getting Started Guide” has been updated with the correct verbiage - [“This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.”]. The revised guide has been uploaded to ATCB. 2) The FCC Label does not contain the proper FCC ID. Please correct. The label diagram was a generic diagram with the characters “XX” used in place of the “V3” characters for this model. The label has been revised and uploaded to ATCB website. 3) The schematics show an oscillator of 5.0 MHz for the micro-controller. According to the block diagram for this model this should be 4.9152 MHz. Please provide the proper schematics. An older version was uploaded with the application. The latest version has been uploaded to the ATCB web site. 4) Please explain why the data for the low frequency TX that was used (page 9 of 10 and 4 of 13) was the older test data and not the higher levels that were obtained for the most recent test date? The data reported was incorrect (actually the extrapolation factor had been applied to the raw receiver reading and not to the receiver plus antenna factor reading). The test data and report (R48374) have been updated to reflect the correct data for the more recent test session. Page 2 of 4 5) The EUT voltage listed for the general Part 15 Radiated emissions (page 5 of 22) states 230 V / 50 Hz. Please note that the FCC requires testing at the rated voltage in the U.S. for this product (120 V / 60 Hz. This was an error in the test data sheet. All radiated emissions tests were performed with the unit powered from an AC voltage of 120V/60Hz and conducted emissions tests were done at both 120V/60Hz and 230V/50Hz. The test data sheets have been updated. 6) Multiple places in the report (page 6 of 17, 8 of 17, 2 of 22 to name but a few) state that the data & control signals were tested again 15.231(e). However the data shows that they were tested against the 15.231(a). Please correct this inconsistency throughout the report. The report and test data have been updated to remove the inconsistency. The updated reports have been uploaded to the ATCB web site. Control signals (Wake-Up and Hello) were both tested against 15.231(a) and the data signals were tested against 15.231(e). 7) It appears that the data/control signals measured were higher than the wakeup signal. Was this expected since the reports states that the wakeup signals was to meet 15.231(a), while the data/control was to meet 15.231(e) - see above? As the Wake-Up signal does not get the benefit of a duty cycle reduction of the pulsed signals, the peak value of this signal is limited to the average limit imposed by 15.231(a) while the pulsed control signals have the peak value and average values limited by the peak and average limits of 15.231(a) respectively. 8) The theory of operation provided information with respect to meeting the requirements of 15.231(a) & 15.231(e). In specific please address the following concerns: a) The information is somewhat ambiguous in relation to the hello and sleep transmission. The information supplied shows that this does transmission does not last longer than 5 seconds. However, does this 5 second limitation always exist, no matter how many tags respond (given that only a certain number of responses will occur in the 5 second window? Please explain The Hello & Sleep transactions with responding tags are automatically limited to 5 seconds of transmission. Any tags which are not put to sleep during that time will be flagged in the log of those responding. The operator must initiate a second transaction, also limited to 5 seconds, in order to process such stragglers. Alternatively, an automated command will be initiated over the network. Page 3 of 4 b) Please give an explanation on how long tags usually take to respond given the anti- collision algorithm. Also, what is the anticipated time that the EUT takes between the wake up command and "hello/sleep" transmissions. After receiving the Hello command, tags respond by transmitting their ID in one of up to 255 randomly selected time slots of 57 msec width each. The anti- collision algorithm determines the slot number for each tag based on its ID number and internal clock counter, with a random increment to spread the transaction uniformly over the interval. The average tag response time after receiving a Hello is then half of the interval time. This can range from 28.5 msec up to several seconds. (Note: the duration of the tag ID packet is 9.44 msec.) The duration between the end of the WakeUp transmission and the beginning of the Hello/Sleep transmission is a random delay depending on the anti-collision algorithm. It ranges from about 60 msec to several seconds. c) Earlier versions of the EUT also had additional type of transmissions in the case that some tags do not respond. Please explain if this device has this and if so, please provide detail on this transmission classification, plots, etc. A previous product stated that an Alarm Condition would be declared under the definition of 15.231(a,4) in the event that not all tags responded. Such a condition would permit EUT transmission to re-try until the alarm was cleared. In practice, this mode was not found essential to operation, and was deleted from the current model. 9) FYI, The data on page 19, 20 & 22 of 22 of the UHF report applied the general limits of 15.209 at some frequencies where the limits of 15.231 could have been applied instead (2603 and 3038 MHz). Thanks – changes have been made to the test data 10) FYI, The correction factor on Note 2, page 21 of 22 was…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Cover Letter(s)

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 September 30, 2002 RE: Savi Technology FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V3 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The users manual should include the information specified in 15.19(a)(3) according to 15.19(a)(5). 2) The FCC Label does not contain the proper FCC ID. Please correct. 3) The schematics show an oscillator of 5.0 MHz for the microcontroller. According to the block diagram for this model this should be 4.9152 MHz. Please provide the proper schematics. 4) Please explain why the data for the low frequency TX that was used (page 9 of 10 and 4 of 13) was the older test data and not the higher levels that were obtained for the most recent test date? 5) The EUT voltage listed for the general Part 15 Radiated emissions (page 5 of 22) states 230 V / 50 Hz. Please note that the FCC requires testing at the rated voltage in the U.S. for this product (120 V / 60 Hz. 6) Multiple places in the report (page 6 of 17, 8 of 17, 2 of 22 to name but a few) state that the data & control signals were tested again 15.231(e). However the data shows that they were tested against the 15.231(a). Please correct this inconsistency throughout the report. 7) It appears that the data/control signals measured were higher than the wakeup signal. Was this expected since the reports states that the wakeup signals was to meet 15.231(a), while the data/control was to meet 15.231(e) - see above? 8) The theory of operation provided information with respect to meeting the requirements of 15.231(a) & 15.231(e). In specific please address the following concerns: a) The information is somewhat ambiguous in relation to the hello and sleep transmission. The information supplied shows that this does transmission does not last longer than 5 seconds. However, does this 5 second limitation always exist, no matter how many tags respond (given that only a certain number of responses will occur in the 5 second window? Please explain b) Please give an explanation on how long tags usually take to respond given the anti-collision algorithm. Also, what is the anticipated time that the EUT takes between the wake up command and "hello/sleep" transmissions. c) Earlier versions of the EUT also had additional type of transmissions in the case that some tags do not respond. Please explain if this device has this and if so, please provide detail on this transmission classification, plots, etc. 9) FYI, The data on page 19, 20 & 22 of 22 of the UHF report applied the general limits of 15.209 at some frequencies where the limits of 15.231 could have been applied instead (2603 and 3038 MHz). 10) FYI, The correction factor on Note 2, page 21 of 22 was not filled in. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. z Page 2September 30, 2002 Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

External Photos

External Photos

ID Label/Location Info

T I T L E C O D E S C A L E : N / A D R A W I N G N o : S H E E T 1 O F 1 R E V : D A T E A P P L I C A T I O N M U L T I P L E U S E D O N R E V I S I O N R E C O R D D E S C R I P T I O N D A T E A A P P R O V E D D R A W N C H E C K E D E N G I N E E R P R O D U C T I O N M A T E R I A L S U S T A I N I N G P R O J E C T L E A D E R D A T A C O N T R O L D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E F I L E N A M E : 7 3 5 0 3 8 7 1 B . T C W N E X T A S S E M B L Y F C C I D : K L 7 - 6 0 0 M R - V3 L A B E L , F C C I D / C E M A R K 6 X 0 P R E A D E R 7 3 5 - 0 3 8 7 1 - T A B S a v i T e c h n o l o g y S u n n y v a l e C A 9 4 0 8 9 5 V D C , 3 0 0 m A A 6 1 5 T A S M A N D R I V E S U N N Y V A L E , C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 0 8 9 0 8 8 9 N O T E S : ( U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E S P E C I F I E D ) D I M E N S I O N S A R E I N I N C H E S , ± . 0 1 5 L A B E L S H A L L B E M A N U F A C T U R E D B Y A U L A P P R O V E D V E N D O R . V E N D O R S H A L L H A V E A C U R R E N T S I G N E D " P R I N T E R A G R E E M E N T " O N F I L E W I T H U L P E R U L M A R K I N G A N D L A B E L I N G S Y S T E M S A N D S H A L L S U P P L Y E A C H P A C K A G E O R R O L L M A R K E D W I T H C O M P A N Y N A M E A N D L A B E L D E S I G N A T I O N P E R U L M A R K I N G A N D L A B E L I N G S Y S T E M S . 1 . 2 . S P E C I F I C A T I O N S 3 . M A T E R I A L C O L O R F O N T L A M I N A T I O N L A B E L D I M E N S I O N S M A Y B E A D J U S T E D T O C L O S E S T S T A N D A R D D I E . 4 . 2 . 2 5 0 0 . 5 0 0 R 0 . 0 5 0 E O # 2 8 2 7 : I N I T I A L R E L E A S E R O R T O N 0 5 / 2 4 / 0 2 B L A C K L E T T E R S O N W H I T E B A C K G R O U N D A R I A L , A R I A L B O L D ( C E M A R K A N D A L E R T N O T I N C L U D E D ) 1 M I L M A T T E C L E A R P O L Y E S T E R F L E X M A R K P M - 2 0 0 - W ( 3 M I L . ) P O L Y E S T E R W I T H V - 2 3 A D H E S I V E ( 1 M I L ) 5 . C E M A R K A N D A L E R T S Y M B O L A R E I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H S P E C I F I C A T I O N 7 3 5 - 0 3 9 3 8 - 0 0 1 . E P H H I L T R B E O # 2 8 6 2 : A D D - 0 0 2 T O - 0 0 4 S / E . S . 0 6 / 1 4 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 4 / 0 2 S / M . T R A N S / E . S C H L I N D W E I N S / B . M A T T O O N S / S . D e M E D E I R O S S / R . P E A R S O N S / G . P A D I L L A S / E . S A M P L E Y E P H H I S I Z E B T A B M O D E L N o . T E X T - 0 0 1 S M R - 6 0 0 P - 1 0 0 K L 7 - 6 0 0 M R - V 1 S M R - 6 0 0 P - 1 0 1 S M R - 6 4 0 P - 1 0 1 - 0 0 2 S M R - 6 0 0 C - 1 0 1 K L 7 - 6 0 0 M R - V 2 S M R - 6 4 0 P - 1 1 0 S M R - 6 4 0 P - 1 1 1 - 0 0 4 S M R - 6 4 0 C - 1 1 1 K L 7 - 6 0 0 M R - V 4 - 0 0 3 K L 7 - 6 0 0 M R - V 3 S E E T A B T A B L E S / T . T . 0 9 / 0 5 / 0 2

ID Label/Location Info

860-04110-002_2A_Assembly.doc Page 4 of 5 9/5/2002 CCA installed in POD base Step 4: Attach POD cover with screws. Model/Serial number Compliance label Step 5: Apply Model number/Serial number and Compliance labels.

Internal Photos

Internal Photos Battery

Test Report

File: R47499 Page 1 of 17 Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to FCC Part 15, Subpart C Specifications for an Intentional Radiator and FCC Part 15, Subpart B Specifications for a Receiver on the Savi Technology, Inc. Model: SMR-640P-101 and SMR-640P-110 FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V1 and KL7-600MR-V1 GRANTEE: Savi Technology, Inc. 615 Tasman Drive Sunnyvale, CA. 94089-1707 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: June 7, 2002 FINAL TEST DATE: May 29, 2002, May 31, 2002, June 3, 2002 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ Mark Briggs Director of Engineering This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: October 16, 2001 File: R47499 Page 2 of 17 Pages TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE..................................................................................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................................................2 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................................................................3 OBJECTIVE...................................................................................................................................................................................3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE..............................................................................................................................................4 EMISSION TEST RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE....................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF RADIATED FIELD STRENGTH - RECEIVER.................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF RADIATED FIELD STRENGTH –INTENTIONAL SIGNAL........................................................................6 BANDWIDTH...........................................................................................................................................................................6 DUTY CYCLE / PERIOD OF OPERATION...........................................................................................................................7 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES....................................................................................................................................7 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS..........................................................................................................................8 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................................................8 ENCLOSURE..............................................................................................................................................................................8 MODIFICATIONS....................................................................................................................................................................8 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........................................................................................................................................................9 EXTERNAL I/O CABLING......................................................................................................................................................9 EUT OPERATION.....................................................................................................................................................................9 TEST SITE....................................................................................................................................................................................10 GENERAL INFORMATION..................................................................................................................................................10 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS..............................................................................................................10 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS..................................................................................................................10 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION................................................................................................................................11 RECEIVER SYSTEM...............................................................................................................................................................11 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER............................................................................................................................11 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN).............................................................................................11 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS...................................................................................................................................................12 ANTENNAS............................................................................................................................................................................12 ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE....................................................................................................12 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION........................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Test Report

Page 1 of 13 Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to FCC Part 15, Subpart C Specifications for an Intentional Radiator on the Savi Technology, Inc. Model: SMR-640P-110 FCC ID: KL7-600MR-V3 GRANTEE: Savi Technology, Inc. 615 Tasman Drive Sunnyvale, CA. 94089-1707 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: August 22, 2002 FINAL TEST DATE: July 23, July 29 and August 6, 2002 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ Mark Briggs Director of Engineering This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: August 22, 2002 File: R48374 Page 2 of 13 Pages TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE..................................................................................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................................................2 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................................................................3 OBJECTIVE...................................................................................................................................................................................3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE..............................................................................................................................................3 EMISSION TEST RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................4 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE....................................................................................................4 LIMITS OF RADIATED INTERFERENCE FIELD STRENGTH.........................................................................................4 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES....................................................................................................................................4 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS..........................................................................................................................5 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................................................5 ENCLOSURE..............................................................................................................................................................................5 MODIFICATIONS....................................................................................................................................................................5 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........................................................................................................................................................5 EXTERNAL I/O CABLING......................................................................................................................................................6 EUT OPERATION.....................................................................................................................................................................6 TEST SITE......................................................................................................................................................................................7 GENERAL INFORMATION....................................................................................................................................................7 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................................................7 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS....................................................................................................................7 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION..................................................................................................................................8 RECEIVER SYSTEM.................................................................................................................................................................8 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER..............................................................................................................................8 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN)...............................................................................................8 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS.....................................................................................................................................................9 ANTENNAS..............................................................................................................................................................................9 ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE......................................................................................................9 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION.............................................................................................................................................9 TEST PROCEDURES.................................................................................................................................................................10 EUT AND CABLE PLACEMENT.........................................................................................................................................10 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS........................................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Contact Information

Applicant

Rosemary Johnston(Vice President, Operations)
[email protected]571-227-7918Fax: 571-227-7960

Technical Contact

Elliott Laboratories, Inc.Mark Briggs
[email protected]408-245-7800

684 W. Maude Ave. · Sunnyvale, California · United States

Non-Technical Contact

Elliott Laboratories, Inc.Mark Briggs
[email protected]408-245-7800

Test Firm

Elliott Laboratories LLCDavid Bare
[email protected]408-245-7800Fax: 408-245-3499

Technical Specifications

#Rule PartsFrequency RangePower Output
115C0.123 MHz - 0.123 MHz-
Confidentiality
Long Term

Other Applications from Savi Technology Inc

RFID Reader - FCC ID KL7-650MR-V6 - Savi Technology Inc
KL7-650MR-V6

RFID Reader

Aug 11, 2010

Equipment Class

DSR - Part 15 Remote Control/Security Device Transceiver
RFID TAG - FCC ID KL7-694T-V1 - Savi Technology Inc
KL7-694T-V1

RFID TAG

Jun 03, 2010

Equipment Class

DXT - Part 15 Low Power Transceiver, Rx Verified
RFID Tag - FCC ID KL7-696T-V1 - Savi Technology Inc
KL7-696T-V1

RFID Tag

Feb 05, 2008

Equipment Class

DXT - Part 15 Low Power Transceiver, Rx Verified
RFID Tag - FCC ID KL7-602T-V1 - Savi Technology Inc
KL7-602T-V1

RFID Tag

Aug 02, 2007

Equipment Class

DSR - Part 15 Remote Control/Security Device Transceiver
Active RF ID Tag - FCC ID KL7-662T-V2 - Savi Technology Inc
KL7-662T-V2

Active RF ID Tag

May 17, 2007

Equipment Class

DSC - Part 15 Security/Remote Control Transmitter