KL7-640T-V1Active RF ID Tag

Savi P/N 805-03912-002 Rev. A Keep This Document EchoPoint Tag ST-64X Compliance Notice Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Notice The Federal Communications Commission has established technical standards regarding radio frequency energy emitted by computer devices. This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference with radio/TV reception. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense. Changes or modifications to this equipment that are not expressly approved by Savi Technology could void the warranty and the authority to operate this equipment. Savi Technology is not responsible for radio/TV interference caused by using unauthorized cable or by making unauthorized changes to this equipment. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Label Statement This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following conditions: • This device may not cause harmful interference, and • This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. The label statement corresponds to the following devices: Device Model FCC ID Radio Tag ST-644-02 KL7-640T-V1 Radio Tag ST-644-12 KL7-640T-V1 Radio Tag ST-645-02 KL7-640T-V1 Radio Tag ST-645-12 KL7-640T-V1

Savi P/N 805-00TBD-001 (Rev.A) Keep This Document EchoPoint Tag ST-644 installation Guide The EchoPoint ST-644 tag consists of a printed circuit board with a non-replaceable battery enclosed in a hermetically sealed plastic case. • The EchoPoint ST-644 tag contains three labels. One face of the tag has a label that includes the tag serial number in both bar code and numerical format. The other tag face has a label with company logo and product model number. The bottom of the tag has a label with compliance markings. • The EchoPoint ST-644 tag can be exposed to environments including rain, snow and direct exposure to sunlight. • The tag battery life is approximately 10 years under normal operating conditions. The tag contains an internal lithium battery and should be discarded according to local safety requirements. Tag Mounting / Attachment • The EchoPoint ST-644 has two mounting holes, 10mm in diameter, for attachment using screws or rivets. • The tag may be mounted vertically or horizontally • In some applications, there may be a preferred orientation of the antennas. The circuit card assembly is located on the sloping face of the case opposite the battery location. The battery side of the case is indicated by the presence of a rounded bar approximately 0.5 x 5.0mm near the end of that face. • The EchoPoint ST-644 tag can be mounted on items of any material. After installation, verify tag operation by exposing it to a 600 Series Signpost and reading the Tag ID with a 600 Series SaviReader. Figure 1 EchoPoint Tag ST-644 Copyright 2002, Savi Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. First edition printed May 2002 The lithium batteries can be harmful to the environment. Please follow current procedures for safely disposing of lithium batteries

T I T L E C O D E S C A L E : N O N E D R A W I N G N o : S H E E T 1 O F 2 R E V : D A T E A P P L I C A T I O N N E X T A S S E M B L Y U S E D O N R E V I S I O N R E C O R D L T R D E S C R I P T I O N D A T E A P P R O V E D D R A W N C H E C K E D E N G I N E E R P R O D U C T I O N M A T E R I A L S U S T A I N I N G P R O J E C T L E A D E R D A T A C O N T R O L D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E F I L E N A M E : 8 0 5 0 3 9 1 0 A . T C W - 0 0 1 C O N F I G U R A T I O N Q U A N T I T Y P A R T N o . D E S C R I P T I O N I T E M 8 6 1 - 0 3 9 1 0 - T A B S T - 6 4 5 - X X A E O # 2 8 5 1 : I N I T I A L R E L E A S E T . T R A N 0 7 / 2 4 / 0 2 I N S T A L L A T I O N G U I D E , B O L T S E A L T A G , S T - 6 4 5 - X X 8 0 5 - 0 3 9 1 0 - 0 0 1 B S L T 2 T E X T F I L E ( 8 0 5 0 3 9 1 0 A . d o c ) 1 1 I I . Q U A L I T Y A S S U R A N C E A . I N S P E C T I O N 1 . I N S P E C T T E X T F O R M I S S I N G O R S U B - S T A N D A R D P A G E S ( P R I N T Q U A L I T Y , A L I G N M E N T , T O R N , E T C ) . 6 1 5 T A S M A N D R I V E S U N N Y V A L E , C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 0 8 9 S I Z E A N A A . I N S T R U C T I O N S : 1 . P R I N T E D M A N U A L ( T E X T ) C O P Y F R O M E L E C T R O N I C M E D I A O N T O 2 0 # W H I T E B O N D P A P E R . 2 . A S S E M B L Y N O A S S E M B L Y R E Q U I R E D . F I N A L F O R M A T I S : 8 . 5 " x 1 1 " , S I N G L E S I D E D . I . M A N U A L P R E P A R A T I O N A Savi P/N 805-03910-001 (Rev. A) Keep This Document EchoPoint Tag ST-645 installation Guide The EchoPoint ST-645 tag consists of a printed circuit board with two non-replaceable batteries enclosed in a Fully potted, hermetically sealed plastic case with an armature containing two inductive coils. • The EchoPoint ST-645 tag contains a label on the top with the tag serial number in both bar code and numerical format and another label that includes product model number. The tag also contains a label on the bottom, which contains the compliance markings. • The EchoPoint ST-645 tag can be exposed to environments including rain, snow and direct exposure to sunlight. • The tag battery life is approximately 10 years under normal operating conditions. The tag contains two internal lithium batteries and should be discarded according to local safety requirements. Tag Mounting / Attachment • The EchoPoint ST-645 has a coil arm, which utilizes a locking bolt assembly. • Place the coil arm such that the holes align with the lock holes of the closed lock hasp. o Slide the lock bolt through the aligned holes and snap the bolt locking mechanism the portion of the bolt protruding past the bottom of the lock. o A tie wrap may be used to limit the extra movement of the tag in transit. Use the integrated tie wrap loop on the tag body to hold the tie wrap in place. After installation the tamper bit must be reset using the appropriate command from a 600 series Signpost and verified response is received on a 600 series SaviReader. Figure 1 EchoPoint Tag ST-645 Copyright 2002, Savi Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. First edition printed May 2002 The lithium batteries can be harmful to the environment. Please follow current procedures for safely disposing of lithium batteries TECHNOLOGY

Page 1 of 2 October 1, 2002 RE: Savi Technology FCC ID: KL7-640T-V1 In response to your comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The cover letter with this application asked about adding additional functionality under 15.209 (at a later time) as a permissive change. The original application filed is for a single TX to 15.231. In order to include the 15.209 functionality, it must be done at the time of the original application since removal of the functionality would be considered a subset. We can not change the application at a later date into a composite application since this would be changing the device in a way that is not allowed by 2.1043. Please let us know if you wish to place this application on hold or to proceed with the filing as is. Please proceed with the application as it stands and the 15.209 mode will be added under a complete new application. If you could advise as to how long the existing test data can be used to support an application it would be appreciated. 2) Since 2 models were tested, are test configuration photographs available for both models? The original tests on the ST-644 were performed with the circuit board fully stuffed (to include all optional components) and mounted into the enclosure for an ST-645. There are test configuration photographs available but they are not significantly different to those submitted. After the original tests had been performed, Savi had to design the daughter-card that was used to connect to the sensor on the ST-645, and so the second series of tests were performed to ensure the radiated levels remained unchanged. 3) The test configurations specified on page 4 & 9 of 12 states that the EUT was tested at 10 meters. The TX tests should have been performed at 3 meters, and the digital device/idle mode at 10 meters for class A. However, the individual test tables appear to all be labeled 3 meters. Please clarify. All transmitter and receiver-related emissions tests were performed at a test distance of 3m. The test data has been revised to clarify this. 4) Please comment on if the receiver is a super-heterodyne design requiring to be tested to the 2 nd LO or if this device should have been tested to 2 GHz per 15.33. Please note that the device was only tested from 30- 900 MHz according to the test report. The receiver is a super-het structure with the receiver LO operating at 433.7 MHz. Testing was performed over the correct frequency range. Page 2 of 2 5) The test report contains 2 different sets of TX timing. The theory of operation explains a signpost mode that correlates to the first set of timing given (contains 4 pulses of data per period). The theory of operation also explains a beacon mode (single transmission sent be TX period). But the other timing provided contains 10 pulses of data and is not contained in the theory of operation. Please explain. The timing showing 4 pulses of data in a single transmission with a minimum of 10 seconds between transmissions is for the Signpost and Alarm modes of transmission. Timing plots for the Beacon mode have been added to the test data and the report has been revised. The set of 10 data pulses followed by 30 seconds of silence is a data transmission mode detailed in the Theory of Operations, section 4.0 as the “Read/Write Data Command”. 6) Please explain the duty cycle of the transmitter during the radiated tests. Was it only transmitting once per 10 seconds, or was it placed into a more continuous TX pattern for test purposes? If the device was only transmitting once per 10 seconds, please explain any special procedures used during test to ensure the worse case results were obtained. The concern is due to the close margin and the difficulty in obtaining worse case results during table rotation and antenna height if the device was not in a more continuous transmit condition. The Tags were transmitting continuously during testing to enable us to make accurate peak measurements. This information is now detailed in the “Test Configuration” section of the test data. The updated files detailed in the notes above have been uploaded to the ATCB website. The files are: R47825 Revised.pdf If you have any further questions, please contact me via [email protected] . Regards Mark Briggs

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 October 1, 2002 RE: Savi Technology FCC ID: KL7-640T-V1 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The cover letter with this application asked about adding additional functionality under 15.209 (at a later time) as a permissive change. The original application filed is for a single TX to 15.231. In order to include the 15.209 functionality, it must be done at the time of the original application since removal of the functionality would be considered a subset. We can not change the application at a later date into a composite application since this would be changing the device in a way that is not allowed by 2.1043. Please let us know if you wish to place this application on hold or to proceed with the filing as is. 2) Since 2 models were tested, are test configuration photographs available for both models? 3) The test configurations specified on page 4 & 9 of 12 states that the EUT was tested at 10 meters. The TX tests should have been performed at 3 meters, and the digital device/idle mode at 10 meters for class A. However, the individual test tables appear to all be labeled 3 meters. Please clarify. 4) Please comment on if the receiver is a superheterodyne design requiring to be tested to the 2 nd LO or if this device should have been tested to 2 GHz per 15.33. Please note that the device was only tested from 30- 900 MHz according to the test report. 5) The test report contains 2 different sets of TX timing. The theory of operation explains a signpost mode that correlates to the first set of timing given (contains 4 pulses of data per period). The theory of operation also explains a beacon mode (single transmission sent be TX period). But the other timing provided contains 10 pulses of data and is not contained in the theory of operation. Please explain. 6) Please explain the duty cycle of the transmitter during the radiated tests. Was it only transmitting once per 10 seconds, or was it placed into a more continuous TX pattern for test purposes? If the device was only transmitting once per 10 seconds, please explain any special procedures used during test to ensure the worse case results were obtained. The concern is due to the close margin and the difficulty in obtaining worse case results during table rotation and antenna height if the device was not in a more continuous transmit condition. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

External Photos ST-645 ST-644

T I T L E C O D E S C A L E : N / A S I Z E D R A W I N G N o : S H E E T 1 O F 1 R E V : D A T E A P P L I C A T I O N 8 6 0 - 0 3 9 0 0 - 0 0 1 U S E D O N R E V I S I O N R E C O R D L T R D E S C R I P T I O N D A T E A A P P R O V E D D R A W N C H E C K E D E N G I N E E R P R O D U C T I O N M A T E R I A L S U S T A I N I N G P R O J E C T L E A D E R D A T A C O N T R O L D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E D A T E F I L E N A M E : 7 3 5 0 3 9 0 2 B . T C W N E X T A S S E M B L Y S T - 6 4 0 E . S A M P L E Y 6 / 1 1 / 0 2 L A B E L , C O M P L I A N C E , 6 4 X T A G A P L 0 1 7 3 5 - 0 3 9 0 2 - T A B E O # 2 8 2 7 : I N I T I A L R E L E A S E A B 6 1 5 T A S M A N D R I V E S U N N Y V A L E , C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 0 8 9 N O T E S : ( U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E S P E C I F I E D ) L A B E L S H A L L B E M A N U F A C T U R E D B Y A U L A P P R O V E D V E N D O R . V E N D O R S H A L L H A V E A C U R R E N T S I G N E D " P R I N T E R A G R E E M E N T " O N F I L E W I T H U L P E R U L M A R K I N G A N D L A B E L I N G S Y S T E M S A N D S H A L L S U P P L Y E A C H P A C K A G E O R R O L L M A R K E D W I T H C O M P A N Y N A M E A N D L A B E L D E S I G N A T I O N P E R U L M A R K I N G A N D L A B E L I N G S Y S T E M S . 1 . 2 . S P E C I F I C A T I O N S B L A C K L E T T E R S O N W H I T E B A C K G R O U N D A R I A L , A R I A L B O L D ( C E M A R K A N D A L E R T N O T I N C L U D E D ) 1 M I L M A T T E C L E A R P O L Y E S T E R 3 . M A T E R I A L C O L O R F O N T L A M I N A T I O N F L E X M A R K P M - 2 0 0 - W ( 3 M I L . ) P O L Y E S T E R W I T H V - 2 3 A D H E S I V E ( 1 M I L ) F C C I D : K L 7 - 6 4 0 T - V 1 0 8 8 9 D I M E N S I O N S A R E I N I N C H E S ( m m ) ± 0 . 0 1 5 ( . 3 8 m m ) 1 . 3 7 ( 3 4 . 9 ) 0 . 5 0 ( 1 2 . 7 ) 4 . C E M A R K A N D A L E R T S Y M B O L A R E I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H S P E C I F I C A T I O N 7 3 5 - 0 3 9 3 8 - 0 0 1 . R 0 . 0 3 1 ( . 7 8 ) 4 X F C C I D : K L 7 - 6 4 0 T - V 1 1 . 3 7 ( 3 4 . 9 ) 0 . 5 0 ( 1 2 . 7 ) R 0 . 0 3 1 ( . 7 8 ) 4 X - 0 0 1 - 0 0 2 S / E . S . 0 6 / 1 4 / 0 2 S / M T R A N S / E S C H L I N D W E I N S / B M A T T O O N S / S D e M E D E I R O S S / R P E A R S O N S / G P A D I L L A S / E S A M P L E Y 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 3 / 0 2 0 6 / 1 4 / 0 2 E O # 2 8 5 1 : A D D E D - 0 0 2 B Label location on 645 (above) and 644 (below)

Internal Photos ST 644 Assembly View ST 645 Assembly View Main circuit board (Top and Bottom) Main circuit board (Top) showing the Daughter Card for the ST-645 Sensor

File: R47825 Page 1 of 16 Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to FCC Part 15, Subpart C Specifications for an Intentional Radiator and FCC Part 15, Subpart B Specifications for a Receiver on the Savi Technology, Inc. Models: 644 and 645 Tags FCC ID: KL7-640T-V1 GRANTEE: Savi Technology, Inc. 615 Tasman Drive Sunnyvale, CA. 94089-1707 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: September 26, 2002 FINAL TEST DATE: June 18 - June 20, September 4, 2002 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ Mark Briggs Director of Engineering This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: July 8, 2002 File: R47825 Page 2 of 16 Pages TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE..................................................................................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................................................2 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................................................................3 OBJECTIVE...................................................................................................................................................................................3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE..............................................................................................................................................4 EMISSION TEST RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE....................................................................................................5 LIMITS OF RADIATED FIELD STRENGTH - RECEIVER.................................................................................................5 BANDWIDTH...........................................................................................................................................................................5 DUTY CYCLE CALCULATION..............................................................................................................................................6 PERIOD OF OPERATION........................................................................................................................................................6 LIMITS OF RADIATED FIELD STRENGTH –INTENTIONAL RADIATOR.................................................................6 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES....................................................................................................................................7 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS..........................................................................................................................8 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................................................8 ENCLOSURE..............................................................................................................................................................................8 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT..........................................................................................................................................................8 EXTERNAL I/O CABLING......................................................................................................................................................8 EUT OPERATION.....................................................................................................................................................................8 TEST SITE......................................................................................................................................................................................9 GENERAL INFORMATION....................................................................................................................................................9 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................................................9 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS....................................................................................................................9 MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION................................................................................................................................10 RECEIVER SYSTEM...............................................................................................................................................................10 INSTRUMENT CONTROL COMPUTER............................................................................................................................10 LINE IMPEDANCE STABILIZATION NETWORK (LISN).............................................................................................10 FILTERS/ATTENUATORS...................................................................................................................................................11 ANTENNAS............................................................................................................................................................................11 ANTENNA MAST AND EQUIPMENT TURNTABLE....................................................................................................11 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION......................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Radiated Emissions Test Configuration Photographs Showing The Tree Orientations Tested