M9H95H04GSM 900/1800/1900 Mobile Phone with Bluetooth

Mobile Phones Division www.sagem.com/mobiles Le Ponant de Paris - 27, rue Leblanc - 75512 PARIS CEDEX 15 - FRANCE SAGEM SA - Société anonyme à directoire et conseil de surveillance capital : 35 500 000 € - 562 082 909 RCS PARIS SAGEM SA couv myx8 22/10/04 14:33 Page 1 1 You have just purchased a SAGEM phone, we congratulate you; it is recommended that you read this handbook carefully in order to use your phone efficiently and in the best conditions.Your phone can be used internationally in the various networks (GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz or PCS 1900 MHz) depending on the roaming arrangements with your operator.We remind you that this phone is approved to meet European standards.WARNINGDepending on the model, network configuration and associated subscription cards, certain functions may not be available.Ensure that your SIM card is a 3 V SIM type that is compatible with your phone. Inserting an incompatible card will be indicated by a message when your phone is switched on. Contact your operator.Your phone is identified by its IMEI number. Write this number down, and do not keep it with your phone, because you may be asked for it in the event of your phone being stolen, in order to prevent it from being used, even with a different SIM card. In order to display the IMEI on your phone's screen, type: *#06#.SAGEM is a trademark of SAGEM SA. AT is a registered trademark of Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. Hayes is a registered trademark of Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. T9 is protected by one or more of the following US patents: 5,818,437, 5,953,541, 5,187,480, 5,945,928, 6,011,554 and other patents are being applied for worldwide.Java and all Java based trademarks and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries.The WAP navigator and some message softwares (i-mode) are under licence Openwave.The WAP navigator and the softwares included are the exclusive property of Openwave. For this reason, it is forbidden to modify, translate, disassemble or even decompile all or part of these softwares.Wellphone™ and SmartCom™ are registered trademarks owned by SmartCom SARL France.The Bluetooth word mark and logos are owned by the Bluetooth SIG, Inc.miniSDTM is a trade mark of SD Card Association. 251750859_myX-8_lu_en.book Page 1 Lundi, 25. octobre 2004 5:24 17 2Who is ORA-ÏTO ? Despite his deceptively exotic-sounding name, he is not Japanese, but French. ORA-ÏTO is the self-taught designer with an interest in everything, who had just turned 20 when, in 1998, he created the first-ever virtual brand. With the brilliant forcefulness of a lightning-bolt, the iconoclastic artist won a name for himself world-wide by pirating the leading brands. Like a born-again Andy Warhol, he parodied the consumer society, using branded objects with emblematic designs. His virtual prototypes rapidly pervaded the media, and were soon exhibited in contemporary-art galleries and museums... Projected to the fore on the international scene, he was then engaged on a multiplicity of assignments in collaboration with the most prestigious names, including L'Oréal, Vogue magazine, Heineken, Adidas, Kenzo, the AIR Group, Honda, Guerlain, Swatch and Nike.Supported by a keen-brained team of specialists in architecture, graphics and communication, he designs both mass-market products in all areas, and luxury products; he produces Internet sites and animation films; he designs spaces to be lived in, and both public and private commercial spaces. His specialism? As it happens, to be unconfined by specialisation! As a multi-specialist, he looks with an ever-new eye on the universe that confronts him. Using boldly-irreverent ideas to overturn the established codes, these unprecedented, and therefore media-grabbing, creations have made Ora-Ïto the most sought-after designer of his generation. More about ORA-ÏTO ? ORA-ÏTO is the youngest designer ever to have been included in the exclusive, jealously-guarded catalogue of the Capellini contemporary-furniture specialist publishing house.The ora-ito.com website visited by over 200 000 visitors a month was the first website and the second digital work acquired for the collection of the French National Contemporary Art Centre. The winner in 2001 of an award from Dazed & Confused magazine, in 2002 ORA-ÏTO received the best packaging Oscar for his Heineken aluminium can distributed throughout the world today. In 2003, he put the finishing touches to the Cab. place du Palais Royal in Paris, the largest Parisian club to which he set his signature with the graphic identity, architecture, furniture and decors. In 2004, in more than 20 countries, ORA-ÏTO launched the 3 perfume for Adidas, a men's and women's fragrance that has already received 5 international product-design and packaging-innovation awards.For the world's most prestigious interior lighting name, Artemide, he designed a collection of lamps that won much acclaim at the Milan furniture fair in 2004. 251750859_myX-8_lu_en.book Page 2 Lundi, 25. octobre 2004 5:24 17 3 Conformance Document 251750859_myX-8_lu_en.book Page 3 Lundi, 25. octobre 2004 5:24 17 4FCC Conformance DocumentFCC Part 24Network NAPRD03.ver 3.0.0Health IEEE P1528/D1.2 Exposure to Radio Frequency Signals- Your wireless handheld portable phone is a low power radio transmitter and receiver. When it is ON, it receives and also sends out frequency (RF) signals. - In August, 1996, the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) adopted RF exposure guidelines with safety levels for handheld wireless phones. Those guidelines are consistent with the safety standards previously set by both U.S. and international standards bodies: ANSI C95.1 (1992)*NCPR Report 86 (1986)*ICNIRP (1996)*(*) American National Standards Institute; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. - Those standards were based on comprehensive and periodic evaluations of the rel…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

ADDENDA FOR myX-8 THIS MODEL PHONE MEETS THE GOVERNMEN T'S REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPOSURE TO RADIO WAVES.Your wireless phone is a radio transmitter and receiver. It is designed and manufactured not to exceed the limits for exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy set by the Federal Communications Commission of the U.S. Government. These limits are part of comprehensive guidelines and establish permitted levels of RF energy for the general population. The guidelines are based on standards that were developed by independent scientific organizations through periodic and thorough evaluation of scientific studies. The standards include a substantial safety margin designed to assure the safety of all persons, regardless of age and health.The exposure standard for wireless mobile phones employs a unit of measurement known as the Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR. The SAR limit set by the FCC is 1.6 W/kg (*) . Tests for SAR are conducted using standard operating positions accepted by the FCC with the phone transmitting at its highest certified power level in all tested frequency bands. Although the SAR is determined at the highest certified power level, the actual SAR level of the phone while operating can be well below the maximum value. This is because the phone is designed to operate at multiple power levels so as to use only the power required to reach the network. In general, the closer you are to a wireless base station antenna, the lower the power output.Before a phone model is available for sale to the public, it must be tested and certified to the FCC that it does not exceed the limit established by the government-adopted requirement for safe exposure. The tests are performed in positions and locations (i.e., at the ear and worn on the body) as required by the FCC for each model. (*) In the United States and Canada, the SAR limit for mobile phones used by the public is 1.6 Watts/kilogram (W/kg) averaged over one gram of tissue. The standard incorporates a substantial margin of safety to give additional protection for the public and to account for any variations in measurements. 251814640_Addenda SAR_myX-8_EN.fm Page 1 Vendredi, 19. novembre 2004 10:20 10 The highest SAR value for this model phone as reported to the FCC when tested for use at the ear is 0.440 W/kg and when worn on the body is 1.07 W/kg. While there may be differences between the SAR levels of various phones and at various positions, they all meet the government requirement. The FCC has granted an Equipment Authorization for this model phone with all reported SAR levels evaluated as in compliance with the FCC RF exposure guidelines. SAR information on this model phone is on file with the FCC and can be found under the Display Grant section of http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid after searching on FCC ID M9H95H04. E Mobile Phones Division www.sagem.com/mobiles Le Ponant de Paris - 27, rue Leblanc - 75512 PARIS CEDEX 15 - FRANCE SAGEM SA - Société anonyme à directoire et conseil de surveillance Capital 35 500 000 € - 562 082 909 RCS PARIS 251814640_Addenda SAR_myX-8_EN.fm Page 2 Vendredi, 19. novembre 2004 10:20 10

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 7 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 2 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 8 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 3

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 9 (19) ANNEX C: INTERNAL PHOTOS PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.:4 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 10 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 5 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 11 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 6 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 12 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 7 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 13 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 8 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 14 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 9 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 15 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 10 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 16 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 11 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 17 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 12 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 18 (19) PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EQUIPMENT Photograph no.: 13

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertuerkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -8475 SAR-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-8454 . As of 2004-11-10 Page 1 of 63 Accredited testing laboratory DAR registration number: TTI-P-G 081/94-D0 Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) DAR registration number: KBA-P 00070-97 Test report no. : 4-1220-30-03/04-C Type identification : H2004 (MyX-8) Test specification : IEEE P1528/D1.2 FCC-ID : M9H95H04 Test specification : CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Test report no.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-11-10 Page 2 of 63 Table of Contents 1 General Information............................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Notes................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Statement of Compliance ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Testing laboratory............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Details of applicant.......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Application details........................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Test item .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Test specification(s) ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.6.1 RF exposure limits ................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Technical test ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Summary of test results ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Test environment ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Measurement and test set-up ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Measurement system ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4.1 System Description ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.4.2 Test environment ................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.3 Probe description ................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.4 Phantom description............................................................................................................................................. 10 2.4.5 Device holder description .................................................................................................................................... 10 2.4.6 Scanning procedure.............................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4.7 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation............................................................................................................................... 12 2.4.8 Data Storage and Evaluation................................................................................................................................ 13 2.4.9 Test equipment utilized ........................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4.10 Tissue simulating liquids : dielectric properties................................................................................................... 16 2.4.11 Tissue simulating liquids : parameters ................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.12 Measurement uncertainty evaluation for SAR test .............................................................................................. 18 2.4.13 Measurement uncertainty evaluation for system validation................................................................................. 19 2.4.14 System validation................................................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.15 Validation procedure............................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Test results (Head and Body SAR)................................................................................................................................ 22 2.5.1 Description of test procedures.............................................................................................................................. 23 2.6 Test results (conducted power measurement)..…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertuerkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -8475 SAR-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-8454 . As of 2004-10-05 Page 1 of 28 Accredited testing laboratory DAR registration number: TTI-P-G 166/98 Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) DAR registration number: KBA-P 00070-97 Appendix to the Report 4-1220-30-03/04-C Calibration Data, Phantom Certificate and detail Information of the DASY4 System Test specification : CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 2 of 28 Table of Content 1 Calibration report “Probe ET3DV6” ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Calibration report “1900 MHz System validation dipole”.................................................................................................. 11 3 Calibration certificate of Data Aquisition Unit (DAE) ........................................................................................................ 11 4 Certificate of Conformity “SAM Twin Phantom V4.0/V4.0C”........................................................................................... 21 5 Application Note System Performance Check..................................................................................................................... 23 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 3 of 28 1 Calibration report “Probe ET3DV6” CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 4 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 5 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 6 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 7 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 8 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 9 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 10 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 11 of 28 2 Calibration report “1900 MHz System validation dipole CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 12 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 13 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 14 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 15 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 16 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 17 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 18 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 19 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 20 of 28 3 Calibration certificate of Data Aquisition Unit (DAE) CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 21 of 28 4 Certificate of Conformity “SAM Twin Phantom V4.0/V4.0C” CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 22 of 28 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information; Report No.: 4-1220-30-03/04-C As of 2004-10-05 Page 23 of 28 5 Application Note System Performance Check 5.1.1.1 Purpose of system performance check The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifica-tions. System and operator errors can be detected and corrected. It is recommended that the system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The measurement of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is a complicated task and the result depends on the proper functioning of many components and the correct settings of many param-eters. Faulty results due to drift, failures or incorrect parameters might not be recognized, since they often look similar in distribution to the correct ones. The Dosimetric Assessment System DASY4 incorporates a system performance check procedure to test the proper functioning of the system. The system performance check uses normal SAR measurements in a simplified setup (the at section of the SAM Twin Phantom) with a well characterized source (a matched dipole at a specified distance). This setup was selected to give a high sensitivity to all parameters that might fail or vary over time (e.g., probe, liquid parameters, and software settings) and a low sensitivity to external effects inherent in the system (e.g., positioning uncertainty of the device holder). The system performance check does not replace the calibration of the components. The accuracy of the system performance check is not sufficient for calibration purposes. It is possible to calculate the field quite accurately in this simple setup; however, due to the open field situation some factors (e.g., laborator…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 3 (19) Annex A: Test Setup Photos Test site CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 4 (19) Test site CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Annex to test report No.: 4-1220-30-05/04 Page 5 (19) Test site