M9HA2005CWGSM 850/1900 Mobile Phone

S ENGLISH 251962115_myX2-2a_lu_en.book Page 1 Mardi, 29. mars 2005 9:46 09 You have just purchased a SAGEM mobile phone, and we congratulate you on your choice.Your phone can be used internationally in the various dual band networks (GSM 850 MHz and PCS 1900 MHz) depending on the roaming arrangements with your operator.This user guide presents the SAGEM myX2-2 and myX2-2m mobile phones range.Depending on the models, the following options are present or not in your phone: MMS, GPRS, data/fax/modem. You can check with your operator or dealer the options supported by your phone.We remind you that this phone is approved to meet European standards.We recommend that you read this handbook carefully before using your phone efficiently and in the best conditions.WARNINGDepending on the configuration of the networks and the associated subscriber cards, some functions may not be available.Ensure that your SIM card is a 3 V (Volt) SIM type that is compatible with your phone. Inserting an incompatible card will be indicated by a message when your phone is switched on. Contact your operator.SAGEM is a trademark of SAGEM SA. AT is a registered trademark of Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. Hayes is a registered trademark of Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. T9™ Text Input is a registered trademark of ©Tegic Communications Inc. T9 is protected by one or more of the following US patents: 5,818,437, 5,953,541, 5,187,480, 5,945,928, 6,011,554 and other patents are being applied for worldwide.The WAP navigator and the softwares included are the exclusive pr operty of Openwave. For this reason, it is forbidden to modify, translate, disassemble or even decompile all or part of these softwares.Wellphone™ and SmartCom™ are registered tr ademarks owned by SmartCom SARL France. 251962115_myX2-2a_lu_en.book Page 2 Mardi, 29. mars 2005 9:46 09 3 Conformance Document 251962115_myX2-2a_lu_en.book Page 3 Mardi, 29. mars 2005 9:46 09 4Safety Information for Wireless handled phonesUse of your phone is subject to safety rules designed to protect the user and his or her environment.Exposure to Radio Frequency Signals- Your wireless handheld portable phone is a low power radio transmitter and receiver. When it is ON, it receives and also sends out frequency (RF) signals. - In August, 1996, the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) adopted RF exposure guidelines with safety levels for handheld wireless phones. Those guidelines are consistent with the safety standards previously set by both U.S. and international standards bodies: ANSI C95.1 (1992) (*) NCPR Report 86 (1986) (*) ICNIRP (1996) (*). - Those standards were based on comprehensive and periodic evaluations of the relevant scientific literature. For example, over 120 scientists, engineers, and physicians from universit ies, government health agencies, and industry reviewed the available body of research to develop the ANSI Standard (C95.1). - The design of your phone complies with the FCC guidelines (and those standards). - For body worn operation, this phone has been tested and m eets FCC RF exposure guidelines when used with an accessory that contains no metal and that positions the handset a minimum of 1.5 cm from the body. Use of other accessories may not ensure compliance with FCC RF exposure guidelines. Phone Operation- Normal position: hold the phone as you would any other phone with the upper zone (back of the LCD display) pointed up and over your shoulder. - Tips on efficient operation: for your phone to operate most efficiently: do not touch cover unnecessarily the top part of the phone with your hand. This would cover the integrated antenna and affect call quality and may cause the phone to operate at a higher power level than otherwise needed. Driving- Check the laws and regulations on the use of wireless phones in the areas where you drive. Always obey them. Also, if using your phone while driving while driving please:• Give full attention of driving, driving safely is your first responsibility • Use hands-free operation, if available • Pull off the road and park before making or answering a call if driving conditions so require. (*) American National Standards Institute; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; International Commission and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. 251962115_myX2-2a_lu_en.book Page 4 Mardi, 29. mars 2005 9:46 09 5 Electronic Devices- Most modern electronic equipment is shielded from RF signals. However, certain electronic equipment may not be shielded against the RF signals from your wireless phone. - Some phone accessories allow to reduce the radiation interferences of the phone. Please contact your distributor. PacemakersThe Health Industry Manufacturers Association recommends that a minimum separation of six (6”) inches be maintained between a handheld wireless phone and a pacemaker to avoid potential interference with the pacemaker. These recommendations are consistent with the independent research by and recommendations of Wireless Technology Research. Persons with pacemakers:- Should ALWAYS keep the phone more than six inches from their pacemaker when the phone is turned ON - Should not carry the phone in the breast pocket - Should use the ear opposite to the pacemaker to minimize the potential for interference - If you have any reason to suspect that interference is taking place, turn your phone OFF immediately. Hearing AidsSome digital wireless phones may interfere with some hearing aids . In the event of such interference, you may want to consult your service provider.Other Medical DevicesIf you use any other personal medical device, consult the m anufacturer of your device to determine if they are adequately shielded from external RF energy. Your physician may be able to assist you in obtaining this information.Turn your phone OFF in health care facilities when any regulations posted in these areas instruct you to do so.Hospitals or health care facilities may be using equipment that could be sen…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 52 of 62 6 Annex C: External Photographs of the Equipment Photo 1: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 53 of 62 Photo 2:

Sagem SA Centre de Saint Christophe - DTM TELEPHONIE MOBILE MOBILE PHONES Date : 16/03/05 Document SAGEM SA Reproduction et divulgation interdites 16/26 2.1.4 Label Informations Sagem SA Centre de Saint Christophe - DTM TELEPHONIE MOBILE MOBILE PHONES Date : 16/03/05 Document SAGEM SA Reproduction et divulgation interdites 17/26

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 54 of 62 7 Annex D: Internal Photographs of the Equipment Photo 1: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 55 of 62 Photo 2: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 56 of 62 Photo 3: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 57 of 62 Photo 4: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 58 of 62 Photo 5: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 59 of 62 Photo 6: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 60 of 62 Photo 7: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 61 of 62 Photo 8: CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Annex to Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 62 of 62 Photo 9:

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertuerkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -8475 SAR-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-8454 . As of 2005-03-30 Page 1 of 68 Accredited testing laboratory DAR registration number: TTI-P-G 081/94-D0 Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) DAR registration number: KBA-P 00070-97 Test report no. : 4-1607-08-02/05 Type identification : A2005Ca+ (R4, Chrome) Test specification : IEEE P1528/D1.2 FCC-ID : M9HA2005CW Test specification : CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 2 of 68 Table of Contents 1 General Information............................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Notes................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Statement of Compliance ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Testing laboratory............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Details of applicant.......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Application details........................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Test item .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Test specification(s) ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.6.1 RF exposure limits ................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 Technical test ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Summary of test results ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Test environment ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Measurement and test set-up ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Measurement system ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4.1 System Description ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.4.2 Test environment ................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.3 Probe description ................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.4 Phantom description............................................................................................................................................. 10 2.4.5 Device holder description .................................................................................................................................... 10 2.4.6 Scanning procedure.............................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4.7 Spatial Peak SAR Evaluation............................................................................................................................... 12 2.4.8 Data Storage and Evaluation................................................................................................................................ 13 2.4.9 Test equipment utilized ........................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4.10 Tissue simulating liquids : dielectric properties................................................................................................... 16 2.4.11 Tissue simulating liquids : parameters ................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.12 Measurement uncertainty evaluation for SAR test .............................................................................................. 18 2.4.13 Measurement uncertainty evaluation for system validation................................................................................. 19 2.4.14 System validation................................................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.15 Validation procedure............................................................................................................................................ 21 2.5 Test results (Head and Body SAR)................................................................................................................................ 22 2.5.1 Description of test procedures.............................................................................................................................. 23 2.6 Test results (conducted power measurem…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertuerkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -8475 SAR-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-8454 . As of 2005-03-30 Page 1 of 40 Accredited testing laboratory DAR registration number: TTI-P-G 166/98 Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) DAR registration number: KBA-P 00070-97 Appendix to test report 4-1607-08-02/05 Calibration data, Phantom certificate and detail information of the DASY4 System CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 2 of 40 Table of Content 1 Calibration report “Probe ET3DV6” .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Calibration report “900 MHz System validation dipole” .................................................................................................. 11 3 Calibration report “1900 MHz System validation dipole .................................................................................................. 23 4 Calibration certificate of Data Aquisition Unit (DAE) ...................................................................................................... 32 5 Certificate of “SAM Twin Phantom V4.0/V4.0C” ........................................................................................................... 33 6 Application Note System Performance Check ................................................................................................................... 35 2005-03-30 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 3 of 40 1 Calibration report “Probe ET3DV6” CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 4 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 5 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 6 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 7 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 8 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 9 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 10 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 11 of 40 2 Calibration report “900 MHz System validation dipole” CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 12 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 13 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 14 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 15 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 16 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 17 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 18 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 19 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 20 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 21 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 22 of 40

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 23 of 40 3 Calibration report “1900 MHz System validation dipole CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 24 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 25 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 26 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 27 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 28 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 29 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 30 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 31 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 32 of 40 4 Calibration certificate of Data Aquisition Unit (DAE) CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 33 of 40 5 Certificate of “SAM Twin Phantom V4.0/V4.0C” CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 34 of 40 CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Calibration Data and Phantom Information to test report no.: 4-1607-08-02/05 As of 2005-03-30 Page 35 of 40 6 Application Note System Performance Check 6.1.1.1 Purpose of system performance check The system performance check verifies that the system operates within its specifica-tions. System and operator errors can be detected and corrected. It is recommended that the system performance check is performed prior to any usage of the system in order to guarantee reproducible results. The measurement of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is a complicated task and the result depends on the proper functioning of many components and the correct settings of many param-eters. Faulty results due to drift, failures or incorrect parameters might not be recognized, since they often look similar in distribution to the correct ones. The Dosimetric Assessment System DASY4 incorporates a system performance check procedure to test the proper functioning of the system. The system performance check uses normal SAR measurements in a simplified setup (the at section of the SAM Twin Phantom) with a well characterized source (a matched dipole at a specified distance). This setup was selected to give a high sensitivity to all parameters that might fail or vary over time (e.g., probe, liquid parameters, and software settings) and a low sensitivity to external effects inherent in the system (e.g., positioning uncertainty of the device holder). The system performance check does not replace the calibration of the components. The accuracy of the system performance check is not sufficient for calibration purposes. It is possible to calculate the field quite accurately in this simple setup; however, due to the open field situation some factors (e.g., laboratory re ections) cannot be accounted for. Calibrations in the at phantom are possible with transfer calibration methods, using either temperature probes or calibrated E-field probes. The system performance check also does not test the system performance for arbitrary field sit-uations encountered during real measurements of mobile phones. These checks are performed at SPEAG by testing the components under various conditions (e.g., spherical isotropy measurements in liquid, linearity measurements, temperature variations, etc.), the results of which are used for an error estimation of the system. The system performance check will indicate situations where the system uncertainty is exceeded due to drift or failure. 6.1.1.2 System Performance check procedure Preparation The conductivity should be measured before the validation and the measured liquid parameters must be entered in the software. If the measured values differ from targeted values in the dipole document, the liquid composition should be adjusted. If the validation is performed with slightly different (measured) liquid parameters, the expected SAR will also be different. See the application note about SAR sensitivities for an estimate of possible SAR deviations. Note that the liquid parameters are temperature dependent with approximately – 0.5% decrease in permitivity and + 1% increase in conductivity for a temperature decrease of 1° C. The dipole must be placed beneath the flat phantom section of the Generic Twin Phantom with the correct distance holder in place. The distance holder should touch the phantom surface with a light pressure at the reference marking (little hole) and be oriented parallel to the long side of the phantom. Accurate positioning is not necessary, since the system will search for the peak SAR location, except that the dipole arms should be parallel to the surface. The device holder for mobile phones can be left in place but should be rotated away from the dipole. The forward power into the dipole at the dipole SMA connector should be determined as accurately as possible. See section 4 for a description of the recommended setup to measure the dipole input power. The actual dipole input power level can be between 20mW and several watts. The result can later be normalized to any power level. It is strongly recommended to note the actually used power level in the „comment“-window of the measurement file; otherwise you loose this c…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 1 of 1 Recognized by the Federal Communications Commission Anechoic chamber registration no.: 90462 (FCC) Anechoic chamber registration no.: 3463 (IC) TCB ID: DE 0001 Accredited by the German Accreditation Council DAR–Registration Number TTI–P–G 081/94-D0 Independent ETSI compliance test house ETSI Accredited Bluetooth ® Test Facility (BQTF) Test report no. : 4-1607-08-04/05 Applicant : Sagem SA Type : A2005Ca+ (R4, Chrome) Test Standard : FCC Part 22, 24 RSS132, 133 FCC ID : M9HA2005CW Certification No. IC : CETECOM ICT Services GmbH Untertürkheimer Str. 6-10, 66117 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 RSC-Laboratory Phone: +49 (0) 681 598-0 Fax: -9075 Test report no.: 4-1607-08-04/05 Date: 2005-03-23 Page 2 of 2 Table of contents 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA OF THE TEST FACILITY..................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Identification of the testing laboratory ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2. NOTES................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 DETAILS OF APPLICANT......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 APPLICATION DETAILS.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 TEST ITEM............................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.6 TEST SETUP........................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.7 TEST STANDARDS.................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 SUMMARY OF MEASUREMENT RESULTS................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 PCS 1900 ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 GSM 850 ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 3 MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 PART PCS 1900 ................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 RF Power Output .......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Frequency Stability..................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1.3 Radiated Emissions..................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.4 Receiver Radiated Emissions ...................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.6 Block Edge Compliance .............................................................................................................................. 33 3.1.7 Occupied Bandwidth................................................................................................................................... 36 3.2 PART GSM 850 ................................................................................................................................................. 43 3.2.1 RF Power Output ....................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.