OVFQCP-3035Portable Cellular Phone

Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Cover Letter Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Request for Reduction in AMPS Power Kyocera Wireless Corporation (KWC) herein submits this request to reduce the AMPS power level on the grant for ID: OVFQCP-3035. Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121-1522 Manufacture:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10300 Campus Point Drive San Diego, California 92121 During the post grant period, we have discovered that the device had increased in SAR from the original filing. The manufacturer of our speaker had changed magnetic suppliers causing a shift up in the SAR value. To insure that the phone remains in compliance with the SAR limit, we are requesting to have this ID AMPS value reduced to 500 mW. New SAR data has been submitted on a phone tested at this level. Please send all requests for information to Robert Scodellaro and myself. Our email addresses are as follows: [email protected] [email protected] Kyocera Wireless Corporation Jay Moulton Director, Engineering

Exhibit 20 External Photo Front Back Left Side View Right Side View Top View Bottom View

Exhibit 19 FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Photo of the FCC ID: The label will be located in the battery compartment.

Internal Photo Front Housing with Keypad Front Housing without Keypad Keyboard PWB Front with LCD Keyboard PWB Front without LCD Keyboard PWB Back LCD Back Shielding Between Keyboard and RF Module RF Board Front RF Board Back Back Housing Inside Assembly Photo

Kyocera Wireless Corp. QCP 3035 SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE (SAR) REPORT Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date August 2000 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 2 File Ref: CONTENTS 1INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................................................3 2SAR TEST FACILITY........................................................................................................................................................................4 3APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.......................................................................................................................................................4 4SAR TEST RESULTS SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................................5 5TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................................................................5 5.1DESCRIPTION OF KWC SAR TEST FACILITY........................................................................................................................6 5.2SAR SYSTEM THEORY...................................................................................................................................................................9 6TEST SAMPLE OPERATION........................................................................................................................................................11 7SAR TEST SYSTEM VALIDATION.............................................................................................................................................14 8SAR MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE..........................................................................................................................................18 9SAR MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY......................................................................................................................................18 10TEST DATA SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................................20 11SAR PLOTS......................................................................................................................................................................................23 12PHOTOS............................................................................................................................................................................................24 Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date August 2000 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 3 File Ref: 1INTRODUCTION This test report describes an environmental evaluation measurement of specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution in simulated human head tissues exposed to radio frequency (RF) radiation from a wireless portable device manufactured by Kyocera Wireless Corp. (KWC). These measurements were performed for compliance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The testing was performed in August 2000 in the KWC SAR Test Facility. The wireless device is described as follows; EUT Type:Trimode, CDMA(PCS), CDMA and Analog (Cellular) Phone Trade Name:Kyocera Wireless Corp. Model:QCP-3035 Tx Frequency :824.04 – 848.97 and 1851.25 – 1908.75 MHz Max. Output Power:28.80 dBm ERP Analog (in cellular band) 27.50 dBm ERP Digital (in cellular band) 26.70 dBm EIRP Digital (in PCS band) Modulation:CDMA and Analog Antenna:Retracting whip w/internal antenna FCC Classification:Non-Broadcast Transmitter Held to Ear Application Type:Certification Serial Number :0W1X0021340818 Place of Test:KWC, San Diego, CA, USA Date of Test:August 18-21, 2000 FCC Rule Part:47 CFR 2.1093; OET Bulletin 65, Sup. C; 47 CFR 22; 47 CFR 24 Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date August 2000 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 4 File Ref: 2SAR TEST FACILITY SAR tests were performed in the KWC SAR Test Facility located at the following address: QCP Inc. Building AA. 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego CA 92121-1522 3APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The QCP-3035 is designed to comply with the specific absorption rate SAR limits for distances within 20 cm of the transmitting elements of the mobile phone, and with general public uncontrolled environment Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits at distances greater than 20 cm from the transmitting elements of the device, as required by Sections 1.1307 through 1.1310, 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the 47 C.F.R. (1997). These FCC RF safety limits, which are based on a hybrid combination of the SAR and MPE requirements from ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) report no. 86, are also consistent with the RF safety limits defined in the IRPA Guidelines on Protection Against Non-Ionizing Radiation which are reportedly in the process of being adopted in Europe, as codified in European Pre-Standard ENV 59166-2 approved by CENELEC (1994). This test report pertains specifically to the following limit from the Code of Federal Regulations 47, Part 2 “Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled exposure: 0.08 W/kg as averaged over the whole-body and spatial peak SAR not exceeding 1.6 W/kg as averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). Exceptions are the hands, wrists, feet and ankles where the spatial peak SAR shall not exceed 4 W/kg, as averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube).” Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date August 2000 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 5 File Ref: 4 SAR TEST RESULTS SUMMARY This device has been tested for localised specific absorp…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

This document was generated in response to a request for additional technical information by Joe Dichoso in regards to the type approval of the QCP-3035. The information included in related to the two specific topics discussed in the following email received by Jay Moulton on September 8, 2000: >Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 16:53:06 -0400 >From: [email protected] (OET) >To: [email protected] >Subject: RF safety only. > >To:Jay Moulton, Kyocera Wireless Corp >From:Joe Dichoso >[email protected] >FCC Application Processing Branch > >Re:FCC ID OVFQCP-3035 >Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corp >Correspondence Reference Number:15995 >731 Confirmation Number:EA98532 >Date of Original E-Mail:09/08/2000 > > >Please place your reply in the RF exposure info folder. A technical review >is pending. > > >Kyocera, EA 98532 - > >1. Please submit a photo of the belt-clip tested with this device for >body-worn SAR compliance and indicate the location where a separation >distance of 23.5 mm was measured, as reported in the SAR report. > >2. Body-worn SAR plots have device illustrated with its antenna placed on >the wrong side and plots for PCS band with antenna OUT are indicating peak >SAR locations shifted and extended outside of the typical regions of the >device and its belt-clip; please review results and clarify. > >3. Body-worn SAR was tested with a specific Kyocera belt-clip accessory. >The proposed body-worn RF exposure info (in the manual) suggests use of >other belt-clip or similar accessories with no metallic component is OK >provided they can maintain 22.75 mm separation. The separation distance >provided by the tested belt-clip and indicated in the SAR report is 23.5 mm. > The use of other belt-clips with the proposed conditions will require >separate body-worn SAR testing with the proposed separation distance >(without any belt-clip). Existing body-worn SAR results using a specific >belt-clip, if containing any metallic component in its assembly, would >typically result in different SAR distributions than others with different >separation distance or component assembly. Please revise the proposed >statement to indicate other belt-clips, holsters or similar accessories that >have not been tested for body-worn SAR may not comply with FCC RF exposure >limit and should be avoided. > >Note: Output is 600 mW ERP for AMPS mode, 479 mW ERP for CDMA mode and 400 >mW EIRP for PCS/CDMA. > >Proposed Grant Conditions - Output is ERP for Part 22 and EIRP for Part 24. > For AMPS mode operation, units produced must not exceed 501 mW conducted >output, as tested for this filing, for satisfying RF exposure requirement. >SAR compliance for body-worn operating configurations is limited to the >specific belt-clip tested for this filing. End-users must be informed of >the body-worn operating requirements for satisfying RF exposure compliance. >The highest reported SAR values are - >AMPS/CDMA modes (Part 22) - Head: 1.53 W/kg; Body-worn: 0.74 W/kg >PCS/CDMA mode (Part 24) - Head: 1.29 W/kg; Body-worn: 0.37 W/kg > >Kwok Chan >Kyocera, EA 98452- 1. Please submit a photo of the belt-clip tested with this device for body The 23.5mm distance was measured between the flat phantom and the back of the phone at the base of the antenna. This distance is shown in the photo below where the ruler is held next to the phone. 1) SAR test set-up photos Photo 1 2. Body-worn SAR plots have device illustrated with it’s antenna placed on the The body-worn SAR plots for FM mode have been revised to show the antenna location on the correct side. The body-worn SAR plots for PCS mode have been redone showing the peak SAR location and the correct antenna location. The plots are below. 7GP P4B, #04, FM ch383, muscle, conducted power=27.0dBm (Hdet=790) SAR (1g): 0.402 [mW/g] ± 0.02 dB, SAR (10g): 0.287 [mW/g] ± 0.00 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1348; ConvF(5.90,5.90,5.90) Muscle 900Mhz: σ = 0.94 [mho/m] ε r = 55.9 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P4B #04, FM ch383, muscle, 8-21-00.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.33 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 3.83E-2 1.15E-1 1.92E-1 2.68E-1 3.45E-1 7GP P4B, #04, FM ch383, muscle, conducted power=27.0dBm (Hdet=790) SAR (1g): 0.739 [mW/g] ± 0.13 dB, SAR (10g): 0.540 [mW/g] ± 0.15 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1348; ConvF(5.90,5.90,5.90) Muscle 900Mhz: σ = 0.94 [mho/m] ε r = 55.9 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P4B #04, FM ch383, muscle, 8-21-00.DA3 Powerdrift: 0.08 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 7.35E-2 2.21E-1 3.67E-1 5.14E-1 6.61E-1 7GP P4B, #04, FM ch799, muscle, conducted power=27.0dBm (Hdet=770) SAR (1g): 0.438 [mW/g] ± 0.05 dB, SAR (10g): 0.313 [mW/g] ± 0.04 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1348; ConvF(5.90,5.90,5.90) Muscle 900Mhz: σ = 0.94 [mho/m] ε r = 55.9 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P4B #04, FM ch799, muscle, 8-21-00.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.08 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 4.05E-2 1.22E-1 2.03E-1 2.84E-1 3.65E-1 7GP P4B, #04, FM ch799, muscle, conducted power=27.0dBm (Hdet=770) SAR (1g): 0.560 [mW/g] ± 0.12 dB, SAR (10g): 0.408 [mW/g] ± 0.17 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1348; ConvF(5.90,5.90,5.90) Muscle 900Mhz: σ = 0.94 [mho/m] ε r = 55.9 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P4B #04, FM ch799, muscle, 8-21-00.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.07 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 5.66E-2 1.70E-1 2.83E-1 3.96E-1 5.09E-1 7GP P4B, #04, FM ch991, muscle, conducted power=27.0dBm (Hdet=820) SAR (1g): 0.414 [mW/g] ± 0.09 dB, SAR (10g): 0.299 [mW/g] ± 0.06 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1348; ConvF(5.90,5.90,5.90) Muscle 900Mhz: σ = 0.94 [mho/m] ε r = 55.9 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P4B #04, FM ch991, muscle, 8-21-00.DA3 Powerdrift: 0.02 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 4.05E-2 1.22E-1 2.03E-1 2.84E-1 3.65E-1 7GP P4B, #04, FM ch991, muscle, conducted power=27.0dBm (Hdet=820) SAR (1g): 0…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

The following data replaces the original SAR data in FCC ID file OVFQCP-3035. The phones have been reduced in power with electrically identical transmit chain. The power level has been lowered by 1.5 dBm. The manufacturing set point will be 24.8 dBm conducted power. The data attached has the phone power set to 25.5 dBm conducted power to adjust for manufacturing tolerances. Head SAR Channel383991799 Extended1.3001.3401.330 Retacted0.8330.9770.871 Body SAR Channel383991799 Extended0.2690.3400.380 Retacted0.5020.4840.452 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=605) SAR (1g): 1.30 [mW/g] ± 0.09 dB, SAR (10g): 0.922 [mW/g] ± 0.09 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Coarse: Dx = 15.0, Dy = 15.0, Dz = 10.0 Generic Twin Phantom; Left Hand Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.88 [mho/m] ε r = 43.1 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, 03-08-01.DA3 Operator: DL SAR Tot [mW/g] 1.34E-1 2.67E-1 4.01E-1 6.68E-1 8.02E-1 9.36E-1 1.20E+0 1.34E+0 03/08/01 <ENTER HERE YOUR COMPANY NAME> 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=605) SAR (1g): 0.833 [mW/g] ± 0.05 dB, SAR (10g): 0.590 [mW/g] ± 0.08 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Coarse: Dx = 15.0, Dy = 15.0, Dz = 10.0 Generic Twin Phantom; Left Hand Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.88 [mho/m] ε r = 43.1 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, 03-08-01.DA3 Operator: DL SAR Tot [mW/g] 8.07E-2 1.61E-1 2.42E-1 4.04E-1 4.84E-1 5.65E-1 7.26E-1 8.07E-1 03/08/01 <ENTER HERE YOUR COMPANY NAME> 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=600) SAR (1g): 1.33 [mW/g] ± 0.05 dB, SAR (10g): 0.946 [mW/g] ± 0.03 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Coarse: Dx = 15.0, Dy = 15.0, Dz = 10.0 Generic Twin Phantom; Left Hand Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.88 [mho/m] ε r = 43.1 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, 03-08-01.DA3 Operator: DL SAR Tot [mW/g] 1.36E-1 2.72E-1 4.09E-1 6.81E-1 8.17E-1 9.53E-1 1.23E+0 1.36E+0 03/09/01 <ENTER HERE YOUR COMPANY NAME> 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=600) SAR (1g): 0.871 [mW/g] ± 0.06 dB, SAR (10g): 0.611 [mW/g] ± 0.08 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Coarse: Dx = 15.0, Dy = 15.0, Dz = 10.0 Generic Twin Phantom; Left Hand Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.88 [mho/m] ε r = 43.1 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, 03-08-01.DA3 Operator: DL SAR Tot [mW/g] 8.21E-2 1.64E-1 2.46E-1 4.11E-1 4.93E-1 5.75E-1 7.39E-1 8.21E-1 03/09/01 <ENTER HERE YOUR COMPANY NAME> 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch991, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=660) SAR (1g): 1.34 [mW/g] ± 0.01 dB, SAR (10g): 0.948 [mW/g] ± 0.00 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Coarse: Dx = 15.0, Dy = 15.0, Dz = 10.0 Generic Twin Phantom; Left Hand Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.88 [mho/m] ε r = 43.1 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch991, 03-08-01.DA3 Operator: DL SAR Tot [mW/g] 1.35E-1 2.71E-1 4.06E-1 6.76E-1 8.12E-1 9.47E-1 1.22E+0 1.35E+0 03/09/01 <ENTER HERE YOUR COMPANY NAME> 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch991, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=660) SAR (1g): 0.977 [mW/g] ± 0.05 dB, SAR (10g): 0.690 [mW/g] ± 0.08 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Coarse: Dx = 15.0, Dy = 15.0, Dz = 10.0 Generic Twin Phantom; Left Hand Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.88 [mho/m] ε r = 43.1 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch991, 03-08-01.DA3 Operator: DL SAR Tot [mW/g] 9.44E-2 1.89E-1 2.83E-1 4.72E-1 5.66E-1 6.61E-1 8.50E-1 9.44E-1 03/09/01 <ENTER HERE YOUR COMPANY NAME> 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=605) SAR (1g): 0.269 [mW/g] ± 0.11 dB, SAR (10g): 0.195 [mW/g] ± 0.13 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz: σ = 0.92 [mho/m] ε r = 56.4 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, muscle, 03-09-01.DA3 Powerdrift: 0.01 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 2.53E-2 5.06E-2 7.59E-2 1.01E-1 1.27E-1 1.52E-1 1.77E-1 2.02E-1 2.28E-1 2.53E-1 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=605) SAR (1g): 0.502 [mW/g] ± 0.04 dB, SAR (10g): 0.368 [mW/g] ± 0.05 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz: σ = 0.92 [mho/m] ε r = 56.4 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, muscle, 03-09-01.DA3 Powerdrift: 0.00 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 4.81E-2 9.62E-2 1.44E-1 1.92E-1 2.40E-1 2.89E-1 3.37E-1 3.85E-1 4.33E-1 4.81E-1 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=603) SAR (1g): 0.380 [mW/g] ± 0.06 dB, SAR (10g): 0.275 [mW/g] ± 0.06 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz: σ = 0.92 [mho/m] ε r = 56.4 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, muscle, 03-09-01.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.06 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 3.68E-2 7.36E-2 1.10E-1 1.47E-1 1.84E-1 2.21E-1 2.58E-1 2.94E-1 3.31E-1 3.68E-1 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=603) SAR (1g): 0.452 [mW/g] ± 0.14 dB, SAR (10g): 0.330 [mW/g] ± 0.15 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz: σ = 0.92 [mho/m] ε r = 56.4 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch799, muscle, 03-09-01.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.09 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 4.35E-2 8.70E-2 1.31E-1 1.74E-1 2.18E-1 2.61E-1 3.04E-1 3.48E-1 3.92E-1 4.35E-1 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch991, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.5dBm (hdet=665) SAR (1g): 0.340 [mW/g] ± 0.09 dB, SAR (10g): 0.248 [mW/g] ± 0.08 dB Cu…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 15:29:10 -0400 (EDT) From: OET <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: To:Robert Scodellaro, Kyocera Wireless Corp From:Joe Dichoso [email protected] FCC Application Processing Branch Re:FCC ID OVFQCP-3035 Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corp Correspondence Reference Number:18779 731 Confirmation Number:EA98532 1. The original grant (EA 98532) indicates units produced must exceed 501 mW conducted output for AMPS mode. The latest submitted cover letter for addressing the recall issues is asking us to reduce the output to 500 mW. Other info indicates that output will be reduced by 1.5 dB and the maximum output will not exceed 25.5 dBm (355 mW) while they are targeting for 24.8 dBm (302 mW). The numbers are inconsistent and need clarification. 2. Original grant measured 646 mW ERP for AMPS mode, 479 mW ERP for CDMA mode and 400 mW for PCS mode. An output reduction of 1.5 dB for the AMPS mode will result in 457 mW ERP for the AMPS mode, which will result in an output lower than that used in the CDMA mode. It needs to be verified if SAR in CDMA mode (479 mW ERP, higher than AMPS) is still compliance. 3. The original grant has provided additional body-worn data without the belt-clip. Please provide similar body-worn data to maintain that portion of the grant conditions or revise the manual to exclude other non-tested belt-clips for all subsequent units. 4. Please confirm when will a post-grant sample, corresponding to this revised grant, be shipped to fulfil the post-grant sample requested sent at mid January (2001). Note: Output is 457 mW ERP for AMPS mode, 479 mW ERP (???) for CDMA mode and 400 mW EIRP or PCS/CDMA. Proposed Grant Conditions - This grant has been re-issued at the grantee's request, as stated in the filing, to reduce AMPS mode output. Output is ERP for Part 22 and EIRP for Part 24. For AMPS mode operation, units produced must not exceed 355 mW conducted output, as tested for this filing, for satisfying RF exposure requirement (may need to include CDMA mode too). SAR compliance for body-worn operating configurations is limited to the specific configurations, including a specific belt-clip, tested for this filing. Other belt-clips, holsters or similar accessories used with this device for body-worn operations must not contain any metallic component in the assembly and must provide at least 2.35 cm separation between the device, including its antenna whether extended or retracted, and the user's body (may need to take out). End-users must be informed of the body-worn operating requirements for satisfying RF exposure compliance. The highest reported SAR values are - AMPS/CDMA modes (Part 22) - Head: 1.34 W/kg; Body-worn: 0.50 W/kg PCS/CDMA mode (Part 24) - Head: 1.29 W/kg; Body-worn: 0.40 W/kg The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 60 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 2.917 (c) and forfeiture of the filing fee pursuant to section 1.1108. DO NOT reply to this e-mail by using the Reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at www.fcc.gov, Electronic Filing, OET Equipment Authorization Electronic Filing. If the response is submitted through Add Attachments, in order to expedite processing, a message which informs the processing staff that a new exhibit has been submitted must also be submitted via Submit Correspondence. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the e-mail address listed below the name of the sender. RESPONSE: Q1. The original grant (EA 98532) indicates units produced must exceed 501 mW conducted output for AMPS mode. The latest submitted cover letter for addressing the recall issues is asking us to reduce the output to 500 mW. Other info indicates that output will be reduced by 1.5 dB and the maximum output will not exceed 25.5 dBm (355 mW) while they are targeting for 24.8 dBm (302 mW). The numbers are inconsistent and need clarification. A1. The cover letter should have been more specific to say 500 mW ERP for AMPS. The original grant was for 600 mW ERP (27.8 dBm) for AMPS. If you subtract 1.5 dB from 27.8, this results in 26.3 dBm, then add 0.7 dB for manufacturing tolerance, this results in 27.0 dBm which converts to 501 mW ERP. Q2. Original grant measured 646 mW ERP for AMPS mode, 479 mW ERP for CDMA mode and 400 mW for PCS mode. An output reduction of 1.5 dB for the AMPS mode will result in 457 mW ERP for the AMPS mode, which will result in an output lower than that used in the CDMA mode. It needs to be verified if SAR in CDMA mode (479 mW ERP, higher than AMPS) is still compliance. A2. The following is SAR data for CDMA 900 MHz mode. It contains SAR data for 900 MHz brain. The body-worn data is included in the response to question number 3. 900MHz Validation 04-16-01 SAR (1g): 0.0968 [mW/g] ± 0.10 dB, SAR (10g): 0.0633 [mW/g] ± 0.11 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.86 [mho/m] ε r = 43.0 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: ValidationFlat 900MHz 04-16-01.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.08 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 9.20E-3 1.84E-2 2.76E-2 3.68E-2 4.60E-2 5.52E-2 6.44E-2 7.36E-2 8.28E-2 9.20E-2 7GP P5K8C #1093, CDMA ch1013, FCC compliance, conducted power=25.7dBm (hdet=655) SAR (1g): 1.36 [mW/g] ± 0.08 dB, SAR (10g): 0.972 [mW/g] ± 0.07 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Left Hand Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.70,5.70,5.70) Brain 900 MHz: σ = 0.86 [mho/m] ε r = 43.0 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP #1093, CDMA ch1013, power=25.7dBm, 04-16-01.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.06 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 1.34E-1 2.68E-1 4.02E-1 5.36E-1 6.70E-1 8.04E-1 9.38E-1…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Cover Letter Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Application for Cellular and PCS Transceiver Type Acceptance Kyocera Wireless Corporation (KWC) herein submits the Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) and Exhibits for Type Acceptance of a Cellular & PCS Transceiver, FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035. Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121-1522 Manufacture:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10300 Campus Point Drive San Diego, California 92121 The equipment, KWC model # QCP 3035, is for mobile station cellular and PCS system use. The QCP 2035 is in full compliance with all parts of EIA/TIA/IS-98-B Mobile Station- Land Station Compatibility Specification, issue July 1998, and also in full compliance with all parts of ANSI J-STD-018, Recommended Minimum Performance Requirements for 1.8 to 2 GHz Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) Personal Stations, issue July 1996. Information concerning how the ESN protection requirements are met is provided in Exhibit 3. Kyocera Wireless Corporation Robert J Scodellaro EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Request of Confidentiality Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Request of Confidentiality Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, the Applicant hereby requests confidential treatment of information accompanying this Application as outlined below: Description All schematics/block diagrams All parts lists The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the Applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Applicant understands that pursuant to Rule 0.457, disclosure of this Application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the Grant for this Application. Kyocera Wireless Corporation Robert J Scodellaro EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 List of Exhibits ExhibitDescriptionFCC Reference 1Certification of Test Data2.911 2General Information2.1033(c), 2.1061, 3ESN Protection22.919 4RF Output Power Measured Data - Cellular2.1046 5RF Output Power Measured Data - PCS2.1046, 24.232 6Modulation Audio Response Measured Data2.1047(a) 7Modulation Limiting Measured Data2.1047(b), 22.917 8Occupied Bandwidth and Spurious Emission Measured Data - Cellular 2.1049, 22.917 9Occupied Bandwidth and Spurious Emission Measured Data - PCS 2.1049, 24.238 10Conducted Harmonics Emissions Measured Data - Cellular2.1051, 22.917, 22.901(d) 11Conducted Harmonics Emissions Measured Data - PCS2.1051, 24.238 12Radiated Spurious and Harmonics Emissions Measured Data 2.1053 13Frequency Stability vs. Temperature and Voltage Measured Data - Cellular 2.1055 14Frequency Stability vs. Temperature and Voltage Measured Data - PCS 2.1055, 24.235 15Measurement Procedures and Techniques 16FCC Letter of Site Recognition 17List of Semiconductor Devices2.1033(c) 18Circuit Diagram2.1033(c) 19Identification (Labels) Information2.1033(c) 20Photographs2.1033(c) 21User’s Manual2.1033(c) 22SAR data2.1093 Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Exhibit 1 Certification of Test Data The data, data evaluation and equipment configuration represented herein are a true and accurate representation of the measurements of the sample’s radio frequency interference emissions characteristics as of the dates and at the times of the test under the conditions herein specified. This applies to all tests that where performed that did not require an Open Area Test Site (OATS). Tests that required an OATS site were performed by TUV Product Services. Equipment Tested: QCP-3035 Dates of Test:July 17 – August 11 2000 Test Performed by: EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager: Robert J Scodellaro Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Exhibit 2 General Information 1.Production Plans Quantity Production Planned 2.Technical Description - Section 2.1033 (c) (1) The full name and mailing address of the manufacturer of the device and the applicant Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Manufacture:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10300 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA92121 (2) FCC Identifier FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 (3) User’s Manual See exhibit 21 (4) Types of Emission 40K0F8W 40K0F1D 1M…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.