OVFQCP-3035ATri-Mode Cellular Phone

Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Request of Confidentiality Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Request of Confidentiality Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, the Applicant hereby requests confidential treatment of information accompanying this Application as outlined below: Description All schematics/block diagrams All parts lists The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the Applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Applicant understands that pursuant to Rule 0.457, disclosure of this Application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the Grant for this Application. Kyocera Wireless Corporation Robert J Scodellaro EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager

Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Cover Letter Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Application for Cellular and PCS Transceiver Type Acceptance Kyocera Wireless Corporation (KWC) herein submits the Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) and Exhibits for Type Acceptance of a Cellular & PCS Transceiver, FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035. Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121-1522 Manufacture:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10300 Campus Point Drive San Diego, California 92121 The equipment, KWC model # QCP 3035, is for mobile station cellular and PCS system use. The QCP 2035 is in full compliance with all parts of EIA/TIA/IS-98-B Mobile Station- Land Station Compatibility Specification, issue July 1998, and also in full compliance with all parts of ANSI J-STD-018, Recommended Minimum Performance Requirements for 1.8 to 2 GHz Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) Personal Stations, issue July 1996. Information concerning how the ESN protection requirements are met is provided in Exhibit 3. Kyocera Wireless Corporation Robert J Scodellaro EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager

Exhibit 20 External Photo Front Back Left Side View Right Side View Top View Bottom View

Exhibit 19 FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Photo of the FCC ID: The label will be located in the battery compartment.

Exhibit 19 FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035A Photo of the FCC ID: The label will be located in the battery compartment.

Internal Photo Front Housing with Keypad Front Housing without Keypad Keyboard PWB Front with LCD Keyboard PWB Front without LCD Keyboard PWB Back LCD Back Shielding Between Keyboard and RF Module RF Board Front RF Board Back Back Housing Inside Assembly Photo

Kyocera Wireless Corp. QCP 3035 SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE (SAR) REPORT Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date March 2001 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 2 File Ref: CONTENTS 1INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................3 2SAR TEST FACILITY...........................................................................................................................................4 3APPLICABLE REGULATIONS...........................................................................................................................4 4SAR TEST RESULTS SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................5 5TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................................5 5.1DESCRIPTION OF KWC SAR TEST FACILITY...............................................................................................6 5.2SAR SYSTEM THEORY.......................................................................................................................................9 6TEST SAMPLE OPERATION............................................................................................................................11 7SAR TEST SYSTEM VALIDATION..................................................................................................................14 8SAR MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE...............................................................................................................18 9SAR MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY..........................................................................................................18 10TEST DATA SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................20 11SAR PLOTS..........................................................................................................................................................23 12PHOTOS...............................................................................................................................................................24 Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date March 2001 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 3 File Ref: 1INTRODUCTION This test report describes an environmental evaluation measurement of specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution in simulated human head tissues exposed to radio frequency (RF) radiation from a wireless portable device manufactured by Kyocera Wireless Corp. (KWC). These measurements were performed for compliance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The testing was performed in August 2000 in the KWC SAR Test Facility. The wireless device is described as follows; EUT Type:Trimode, CDMA(PCS), CDMA and Analog (Cellular) Phone Trade Name:Kyocera Wireless Corp. Model:QCP-3035 Tx Frequency :824.04 – 848.97 and 1851.25 – 1908.75 MHz Max. Output Power:28.41 dBm ERP Analog (in cellular band) 27.08 dBm ERP Digital (in cellular band) 27.90 dBm EIRP Digital (in PCS band) Modulation:CDMA and Analog Antenna:Retracting whip w/internal antenna FCC Classification:Non-Broadcast Transmitter Held to Ear Application Type:Certification Serial Number :75B0100353140 Place of Test:KWC, San Diego, CA, USA Date of Test:March 5 - 6, 2001 FCC Rule Part:47 CFR 2.1093; OET Bulletin 65, Sup. C; 47 CFR 22; 47 CFR 24 Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date March 2001 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 4 File Ref: 2SAR TEST FACILITY SAR tests were performed in the KWC SAR Test Facility located at the following address: QCP Inc. Building AA. 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego CA 92121-1522 3APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The QCP-3035 is designed to comply with the specific absorption rate SAR limits for distances within 20 cm of the transmitting elements of the mobile phone, and with general public uncontrolled environment Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits at distances greater than 20 cm from the transmitting elements of the device, as required by Sections 1.1307 through 1.1310, 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the 47 C.F.R. (1997). These FCC RF safety limits, which are based on a hybrid combination of the SAR and MPE requirements from ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) report no. 86, are also consistent with the RF safety limits defined in the IRPA Guidelines on Protection Against Non-Ionizing Radiation which are reportedly in the process of being adopted in Europe, as codified in European Pre-Standard ENV 59166-2 approved by CENELEC (1994). This test report pertains specifically to the following limit from the Code of Federal Regulations 47, Part 2 “Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled exposure: 0.08 W/kg as averaged over the whole- body and spatial peak SAR not exceeding 1.6 W/kg as averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube). Exceptions are the hands, wrists, feet and ankles where the spatial peak SAR shall not exceed 4 W/kg, as averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube).” Company Kyocera Wireless Corp. Document No. QCP-3035 SAR REPORT Issue No:Date March 2001 Equipment QCP-3035 Page Number 5 File Ref: 4 SAR TEST RESULTS SUMMARY This device has been tested for localised specific absorption rate (SAR) for uncontrolled environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1 ~ 1992 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.3 ~ 1992 . Normal antenna operating positions were incorporated, with the device transmitting at frequencies consistent with normal usage of the device. The device has been sh…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:31:58 -0500 (EST) From: OET <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: To: Jay Moulton, Kyocera Wireless Corp. From: Joe Dichoso [email protected] FCC Application Processing Branch Re: FCC ID OVFQCP-3035A Applicant: Kyocera Wireless Corp Correspondence Reference Number: 18469 731 Confirmation Number: EA100274 1) Indicate the differences between this pending application FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 and the granted application FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035A. The test reports, photo are all the same but the SAR report is different? New radiated and output data and also photo's are required if changes are made such as shielding, adding speakers or changing output power. 1A) The pending application is FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035A and the granted application is FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035. The only difference is that the pending application FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035A has a different metalization pattern on the inside of the phone’s front cover for SAR purposes. Photos of the new metalization pattern were included in the new SAR report. In a meeting between Jay Moulton of Kyocera and Kwok Chan & Ken Nickels of the FCC, both parties agreed that only a new SAR report was needed for this filing and that measurements such as radiated spurious emissions were not needed. Included in the new SAR report is the ERP and EIRP radiated output power measurements. Many of the following items are similar to what was previously asked for. 2) Compliance with the E911 requirements in Section 22.921. 2A) QCP-3035 is compliant with E911 requirement specified in CFR 47, Section 22.921. The following capture is taken from QCP-3035 compatibility software application notes. FCC compliance Emergency 911 When an emergency 911 call is originated by the user, the mobile will attempt to acquire any available system and originate the emergency call on that system, disregarding restrictions set by the roaming list. The FCC NPRM WT99-13, CC94-102 automatic analog A/B roaming option has been implemented for 911 emergency calls. Note that the QCP-3035 does not have Global Positioning System (GPS) support. 3) The "description" in the confidential letter is missing and needs clarification. What is the "description" Submit the "description" in the operational description folder of the electronic file. Any confidential description in the Test report must be separated and submitted separately from the test report exhibit. 3A) The word, "description" should not have been in the confidential letter. Kyocera does not want any "description" in the Test Report to be held confidential. Request of Confidentiality Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Request of Confidentiality Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission's Rules, the Applicant hereby requests confidential treatment of information accompanying this Application as outlined below: All schematics/block diagrams All parts lists The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the Applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Applicant understands that pursuant to Rule 0.457, disclosure of this Application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the Grant for this Application. Kyocera Wireless Corporation Robert J Scodellaro EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager 3) Resolve any output power output power discrepancies between the data in the radiated emissions exhibit, the SAR report and the test report and the requested output power. The ERP measurements in the test report incorrectly uses 49.8 instead of 49.2 for the ERP calculations. Please resolve/explain/correct all ERP and EIRP output powers. The requested output powers must agree with all exhibits. 3A) The original ERP and EIRP radiated output power amplitude levels were always correct, it was the test method in the original submittal report that was incorrect. The ERP and EIRP radiated output power was never measured on an OATS site. It was measured in an antenna range anechoic chamber. You can check in the original submittal data package and see that on page 12 of the SAR report the conducted output power and on page 13 the ERP and EIRP radiated output power that SAR was tested at. Kyocera always measures SAR with the phone set to an ERP and EIRP level that is 0.7 dB above the ERP and EIRP radiated output power that should be on the grant. This 0.7 dB is to insure compliance to SAR requirements with manufacturing tolerance. I have included the data sheets and test procedure. Transmitter RF Power Output - FCC part 2, Paragraph 2.1046 Transmitter RF Power Output - FCC part 2, Paragraph 2.1046 7/20/2000 Radiated Power -- The RF output power (ERP) was measured in an antenna range anechoic chamber. RF output power (W) – Cellular ERP Measured carrier frequency (MHz) channel FM CDMA 824.049910.646 824.710130.479 836.493830.5370.407 848.317770.407 848.977990.513 Transmitter RF Power Output - FCC part 24, Paragraph 2.1046, 24.232 (b) Transmitter RF Power Output - FCC part 24, Paragraph 2.1046, 24.232 (b) 7/21/2000 Radiated power -- The RF output power (EIRP) was measured in an antenna range anechoic chamber. RF output power (W) – PCS EIRP carrier frequency (MHz) channelCDMA measured 1851.25250.400 18806000.302 1908.7511750.240 Anechonic Chamber HPIB line QC P-3035 Horn Ant. 2.5 Meters Giga-tronic 8541C Univeral Power meter PCPositioner controller ERP/EIRP measurement Test Setup - Measurement Method - Set QCP-3035 conducted power level using phone_t software (KWC phone control software), then mount it on PVC pipe inside the antenna range anechoic chamber, rotate the phone 360degree in azimuth and elevation. The horn antenna receives the handset signal from 2.5 meters away. The computer will record the maximum radiated power taking into consideration of all path losses, ERP for 800MHz cellular band and EIRP for PCS band. The ent…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

To: [email protected] Subject: Fwd: Cc: [email protected] Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:08:59 -0500 (EST) From: OET <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: To: Jay Moulton, Kyocera Wireless Corp. From: Joe Dichoso [email protected] FCC Application Processing Branch Re: FCC ID OVFQCP-3035A Applicant: Kyocera Wireless Corp Correspondence Reference Number: 18606 731 Confirmation Number: EA100274 1. A belt-clip photo was requested. Please submit the belt-clip photo. Also, several photo's were skipped that were included in the original. The missing photos are needed to resolve the belt- clip/device separation distance issues you had raised. 2. SAR was done with and without the belt-clip for the original filing, therefore, the body-worn statement in the original accounts for both. You did not do body-worn SAR without the belt-clip for this new filing. The same body-worn statement for the original needs to be revised to indicate body-worn is applicable to the tested belt-clip only. 3. New photos of the shielding and metallization were requested. The reply indicates it is in the SAR report and there is none in the SAR report. 4. The reply indicates no new spurious emissions is required. This is not true, spurious emissions were requested via e-mail sent to Jay Moulton on 2/28/01. 5. The field strength of the fundamental (for 800 MHz band) are indicating higher output than those ERP data, please check if there could be output issues. Measured ERP is 646 mW and 479 mW for AMPS and CDMA (as reported in the original filing, not re-measured) but the field strength of spurious emission is indicating 855 mW and 579 mW ERP ? Make sure the new spurious emissions data agrees with the submitted ERP data. 6. The SAR report is describing the device with the original FCC ID (the recalled one), not this new FCC ID. Please correct it. 7. The SAR report describes a body-worn holster. It was tested with a belt-clip ? (see Section 5). We need those photos to verify which is which. 8. The AMPS mode SAR plots for the low and middle channels are identical. Re-submit the correct plots. .FYI Use SCC-34 tissue parameters for future filings and also report tissue parameters within the operating frequencies of the device instead of using generic frequencies (900 MHz and 1800 MHz, these are out of band). Mid band frequencies for this device are 836 MHz and 1880 MHz. The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 60 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 2.917 (c) and forfeiture of the filing fee pursuant to section 1.1108. DO NOT reply to this e-mail by using the Reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at www.fcc.gov, Electronic Filing, OET Equipment Authorization Electronic Filing. If the response is submitted through Add Attachments, in order to expedite processing, a message which informs the processing staff that a new exhibit has been submitted must also be submitted via Submit Correspondence. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the e-mail address listed below the name of the sender. Respounce Q1. A belt-clip photo was requested. Please submit the belt-clip photo. Also, several photo's were skipped that were included in the original. The missing photos are needed to resolve the belt-clip/device separation distance issues you had raised. A1. The following photos show the belt clip and the separation between the belt clip and the body. Q2. SAR was done with and without the belt-clip for the original filing, therefore, the body-worn statement in the original accounts for both. You did not do body-worn SAR without the belt-clip for this new filing. The same body-worn statement for the original needs to be revised to indicate body-worn is applicable to the tested belt-clip only. A2. We should have provided the body-worn SAR without the belt-clip. The following data is for body-worn SAR without the belt-clip at a distance of 23.50 mm closest separation to the rear of the phone. Muscle Tissue Calibration Data Sheet FM ch991, muscle, power=27dBm, hdet=785 SAR (1g): 0.662 [mW/g] ± 0.19 dB, SAR (10g): 0.473 [mW/g] ± 0.16 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz: σ = 0.91 [mho/m] ε r = 56.6 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch991, muscle, 04-06-01.DA3 Powerdrift: 0.21 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 5.95E-2 1.19E-1 1.78E-1 2.38E-1 2.97E-1 3.57E-1 4.16E-1 4.76E-1 5.35E-1 5.95E-1 FM ch991, muscle, power=27dBm, hdet=785 SAR (1g): 0.585 [mW/g] ± 0.12 dB, SAR (10g): 0.420 [mW/g] ± 0.12 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz: σ = 0.91 [mho/m] ε r = 56.6 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch991, muscle, 04-06-01.DA3 Powerdrift: 0.02 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 5.28E-2 1.06E-1 1.58E-1 2.11E-1 2.64E-1 3.17E-1 3.70E-1 4.22E-1 4.75E-1 5.28E-1 FM ch383, muscle, power=27dBm, hdet=715 SAR (1g): 0.361 [mW/g] ± 0.14 dB, SAR (10g): 0.262 [mW/g] ± 0.15 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz: σ = 0.91 [mho/m] ε r = 56.6 ρ = 1.00 [g/cm 3 ] File Name: 7GP P5K8C #1093, FM ch383, muscle, 04-06-01.DA3 Powerdrift: -0.10 dB SAR Tot [mW/g] 3.41E-2 6.82E-2 1.02E-1 1.36E-1 1.71E-1 2.05E-1 2.39E-1 2.73E-1 3.07E-1 3.41E-1 FM ch383, muscle, power=27dBm, hdet=715 SAR (1g): 0.516 [mW/g] ± 0.10 dB, SAR (10g): 0.376 [mW/g] ± 0.11 dB Cubes (2) (Worst-case extrapolation) Generic Twin Phantom; Flat Section Probe: ET3DV5 - SN1353; ConvF(5.53,5.53,5.53) Muscle 900 MHz…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 103138-03 Page 1 of 13 Rev.No 1.0 RADIATED EMISSIONS DATA FOR KYOCERA WIRELESS CORPORATION 10300 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Prepared by TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 103138-03 Page 2 of 13 Rev.No 1.0 Measurement Requirements (CFR 47 Part 2, Paragraph 2.1053; Part 22 Paragraph 22.917(b)(2) and Part 24, Paragraph 24.238 The measurements which follow were performed by TÜV Product Service. To the best of my knowledge these tests were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in Part 2 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. The data presented below demonstrates compliance with the appropriate technical standards. _____________________________ Floyd R. Fleury EMC Manager TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 103138-03 Page 3 of 13 Rev.No 1.0 Emissions Test Conditions: SPURIOUS RADIATED EMISSIONS Roof (small open area test site) The Spurious Radiated Emissions measurements were performed using the following equipment: Test Equipment Used : Model No.Prop. No.DescriptionManufacturerSerial No.Cal Date 85660B407Spectrum Analyzer & DisplayHewlett Packard2311A0220902/02 3146244AntennaEMCO106302/02 3115453Double Ridge AntennaEMCO9412-436310/01 FF6549-2781/777High Pass FilterSage Laboratories007N/A* FF6549-1732/787900 MHz HPFSage006N/A* AFD3-0208-40-ST367PreamplifierMiteq155382N/A* AFS4-08001800-70-10P-4368PreamplifierMiteq167N/A* Remarks:(*) Verified TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 103138-03 Page 4 of 13 Rev.No 1.0 FCC Part 2, Paragraph 2.1053; Part 22, Paragraph 22.917(b)(2) and Part 24, Paragraph 24.238 QCP 3035 Tri-Mode Cellular Phone Operating Mode: FM Transmit; CDMA 800 Transmit; PCS Transmit TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 103138-03 Page 8 of 13 Rev.No 1.0 Testing Facilities Certificates of Approval TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 103138-03 Page 13 of 13 Rev.No 1.0 Photograph of Test Setup

Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Cover Letter Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Application for Cellular and PCS Transceiver Type Acceptance Kyocera Wireless Corporation (KWC) herein submits the Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) and Exhibits for Type Acceptance of a Cellular & PCS Transceiver, FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035. Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121-1522 Manufacture:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10300 Campus Point Drive San Diego, California 92121 The equipment, KWC model # QCP 3035, is for mobile station cellular and PCS system use. The QCP 2035 is in full compliance with all parts of EIA/TIA/IS-98-B Mobile Station- Land Station Compatibility Specification, issue July 1998, and also in full compliance with all parts of ANSI J-STD-018, Recommended Minimum Performance Requirements for 1.8 to 2 GHz Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) Personal Stations, issue July 1996. Information concerning how the ESN protection requirements are met is provided in Exhibit 3. Kyocera Wireless Corporation Robert J Scodellaro EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Request of Confidentiality Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Re:Request of Confidentiality Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, the Applicant hereby requests confidential treatment of information accompanying this Application as outlined below: Description All schematics/block diagrams All parts lists The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the Applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Applicant understands that pursuant to Rule 0.457, disclosure of this Application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the Grant for this Application. Kyocera Wireless Corporation Robert J Scodellaro EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 List of Exhibits ExhibitDescriptionFCC Reference 1Certification of Test Data2.911 2General Information2.1033(c), 2.1061, 3ESN Protection22.919 4RF Output Power Measured Data - Cellular2.1046 5RF Output Power Measured Data - PCS2.1046, 24.232 6Modulation Audio Response Measured Data2.1047(a) 7Modulation Limiting Measured Data2.1047(b), 22.917 8Occupied Bandwidth and Spurious Emission Measured Data - Cellular 2.1049, 22.917 9Occupied Bandwidth and Spurious Emission Measured Data - PCS 2.1049, 24.238 10Conducted Harmonics Emissions Measured Data - Cellular2.1051, 22.917, 22.901(d) 11Conducted Harmonics Emissions Measured Data - PCS2.1051, 24.238 12Radiated Spurious and Harmonics Emissions Measured Data 2.1053 13Frequency Stability vs. Temperature and Voltage Measured Data - Cellular 2.1055 14Frequency Stability vs. Temperature and Voltage Measured Data - PCS 2.1055, 24.235 15Measurement Procedures and Techniques 16FCC Letter of Site Recognition 17List of Semiconductor Devices2.1033(c) 18Circuit Diagram2.1033(c) 19Identification (Labels) Information2.1033(c) 20Photographs2.1033(c) 21User’s Manual2.1033(c) 22SAR data2.1093 Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Exhibit 1 Certification of Test Data The data, data evaluation and equipment configuration represented herein are a true and accurate representation of the measurements of the sample’s radio frequency interference emissions characteristics as of the dates and at the times of the test under the conditions herein specified. This applies to all tests that where performed that did not require an Open Area Test Site (OATS). Tests that required an OATS site were performed by TUV Product Services. Equipment Tested: QCP-3035 Dates of Test:July 17 – August 11 2000 Test Performed by: EMC Engineer, Staff/Manager: Robert J Scodellaro Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 Exhibit 2 General Information 1.Production Plans Quantity Production Planned 2.Technical Description - Section 2.1033 (c) (1) The full name and mailing address of the manufacturer of the device and the applicant Applicant:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10290 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Manufacture:Kyocera Wireless Corporation 10300 Campus Point Drive San Diego, CA92121 (2) FCC Identifier FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 (3) User’s Manual See exhibit 21 (4) Types of Emission 40K0F8W 40K0F1D 1M25F9W F3E voice F3D supervisory audio tones, signaling tones F1D wideband data signal (5)Frequency range The frequency range of the equipment in Domestic Public Cellular Radio Telecommunications Service bands, 824 - 849 MHz and 869 - 894 MHz for FM and cellular CDMA. The channel spacing is 30 kHz for FM. The frequency range of the equipment in the Personal Communications Services (PCS) bands, 1850 – 1910 MHz and 1930 – 1990 MHz. The channel spacing is 1.25 MHz for CDMA. (6)Operating power levels Applicant: KWC Corp.FCC ID: OVFQCP-3035 The transmitter output power is independent of whether the equipment operates in the cellular system FM or CDMA mode, or PCS system CDMA mode. The equipment supports Class 3 Cellular Mobile Station Power Class, and Class 2 PCS Mobile Station Power Class. Its power output capability is reported to the Land Station via Station Class Mark. The equipment will respond to commands from the Land Station to change power levels as defined in the EIA/TIA/IS-98 and ANSI J-STD-018 Specification. (7)Maximum output power The equipment supports the maximum output power for Class 3 Cellular Mobile Station which is -2 dBW ERP for a FM mode and in the range of -7 dBW to 0 dBW ERP for a CDMA mode, and meets the 7 W ERP (+8.45 dBW) maximum power limitation of Section 22.913. The equipment supports the maximum output power for Class 2 PCS Mobile Station which is in the range of -7dBW to 0 dBW EIRP, and is within the limited 2 watts E.I.R.P. peak power of CFR 47 Part 24.232 (b). The equipment is able to limit …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 0326-03 Page 1 of 15 Rev.No 1.0 SPURIOUS EMISSIONS DATA FOR KYOCERA WIRELESS CORPORATION 10290 Campus Pointe Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Prepared by TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858 546 0364 Report No. 0326-03 Page 2 of 15 Rev.No 1.0 Measurement Requirements The measurements which follow were performed by TÜV Product Service. To the best of my knowledge these tests were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in Part 25 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. The data presented below demonstrates compliance with the appropriate technical standards. _____________________________ Floyd R. Fleury EMC Manager TÜV PRODUCT SERVICE 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone 858 546 3999 FAX 858…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.