PNQCBPABMONGXNA55PCS Beamer Array

Proprietary Information Title: BEAMER Array System- Assembly and Operation Manual Doc. No.: 913000101 Rev.: 1 Page: 1 of 92 Cellular Transmission Solutions P.O. Box 106, Tavor building 1, Yoqne'am Ilit 20692, ISRAEL Tel. + 972 4 9592522 Fax. + 972 4 9592523 E-mail: [email protected] BEAMER TM Active Radiating Module System PCS Pol BEAMER Rev.3.1 Array System including Interface and Control Unit (ICU) Assembly & Operation Manual No.913000101 Name Date Signature Written By N.David Checked G.Argaman Approved M.Shalom Proprietary Information Title: BEAMER Array System- Assembly and Operation Manual Doc. No.: 913000101 Rev.: 1 Page: 2 of 92 FCC Part 15A Complience Statement This device complies with part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference , and (2) this device must accept any interference received , including interference that may cause undesired operation Caution Changes or Modifications not expressly approved by Celletra Ltd. could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment” NOTE This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate Radio Frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communication. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense. PROPRIETARY NOTICE ALL DATA AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN OR DISCLOSED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF CELLETRA LTD AND ALL RIGHTS THEREIN ARE EXPRESSLY RESERVED. BY ACCEPTING THIS MATERIAL, THE RECIPIENT AGREES THAT THIS MATERIAL AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN IS HELD IN CONFIDENCE AND IN TRUST AND WILL NOT BE USED, COPIED, REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART. NOR ITS CONTENTS REVEALED IN ANY MANNER TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE EXPLICIT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF CELLETRA LTD. Proprietary Information Title: BEAMER Array System- Assembly and Operation Manual Doc. No.: 913000101 Rev.: 1 Page: 3 of 92 Revision Description Date 0 Release May, 2000 1 FCC part 15 statemnet & power level modification May 2001 Changes are periodically made to the information contained in this manual. These changes are published in the "software/hardware release notes", and will be incorporated into new editions. All rights are reserved. No parts of this manual may be reproduced in any form, without permission in writing from Celletra Ltd. Copyright © 1999, 2000 Celletra Ltd. BEAMER is a trademark of Celletra Ltd. Celletra Ltd. reserves the right to change specifications without notice. CONTENTS Proprietary Information Title: BEAMER Array System Assembly and Operation Manual Doc. No.: 913000000 Rev.: 00 Page: 4 of 92 CONTENTS FIGURES TABLES 1. INTRODUCTION 13 1.1. Acronyms and Abbreviations 13 1.2. BEAMER Array System Overview 14 1.2.1. BEAMER Family Modular Concept........................................................................................ 15 1.3. Overview of the Interface and Control Unit (ICU) 16 1.3.1. Interface and Control Unit - ICU ............................................................................................. 16 1.3.2. ICU Controller Description ..................................................................................................... 17 1.3.3. RF Path Description................................................................................................................. 19 1.3.4. Bias-T Types............................................................................................................................ 19 1.4. Communication with BEAMER and PC 20 1.4.1. Network Architecture and Capacity......................................................................................... 20 1.5. Communication Procedure 20 1.5.1. BEAMER Monitoring and Control.......................................................................................... 20 1.6. DC Distribution 21 1.7. Maintainability Requirements 22 2. INSTALLATION GUIDE 23 2.1. Applicable Documents 23 2.2. Scope 23 CONTENTS Proprietary Information Title: BEAMER Array System- Assembly and Operation Manual Doc. No.: 913000100 Rev.: 00 Page: 5 of 92 2.3. Important Safety Precautions 23 2.3.1. Handling and Moving the BEAMER Array ............................................................................. 24 2.3.2. System Measurement and Testing Conditions ......................................................................... 25 2.4. ICU Operation Instructions 25 2.4.1. DC Connections and Fuse Replacement .................................................................................. 25 2.4.2. Connecting the Unit to a Host PC or BTS Controller .............................................................. 27 2.4.3. Replacing the Back-Up Battery................................................................................................ 28 2.4.4. Bias-Ts 29 2.5. Array Installation 30 2.6. Assembly Instructions for the PCS 1x4x4 Array 30 2.6.1. Mounting Assembly (Figure 12): ............................................................................................. 30 2.6.2. BEAMER Array Mounting (Figures 13 and 14): .................................................................... 30 2.6.3. BEAMER Array Dismounting (Figures 13 and 14): ................................................................ 31 2.6.4. BEAMER Dismounting (Figure 15): ....................................................................................... 31 2.6.5. BEAMER Mounting (Figure 15 and 16)..................................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

1 Chris Harvey From: Chris Harvey Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:07 AM To: Liming Xu; Greg Czumak; Marianne Bosley Subject: RE: Celletra I agree with Liming's comments. 1) The Bandedge compliance does not apply to this device which is an amplifier, because it is dependant on the BTS that it is connected to. 2) The Radiated Spurious Emissions are listed in the report as being >30dB below the limit and thus not reported. I verified on the datasheet that this test was performed with no measurable emissions. No further testing is necessary. 3) we will get the customer to modify the manual in accordance with discussions between Liming and Israel. This spplication is ready to Grant. -----Original Message----- From:Liming Xu Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:26 PM To:Chris Harvey; Greg Czumak; Marianne Bosley Subject:RE: Celletra Please my answer follow each questions -----Original Message----- From:Marianne Bosley Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:47 PM To:Liming Xu Subject:FW: Celletra Here it is Liming, Greg said he would be back to reviewing around 9PM. his phone number is 610-380-1857. Marianne T. Bosley EMC Administrator 410-354-3300, ext. 412 -----Original Message----- From:Fr. Gregory Czumak [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:12 PM To:Marianne Bosley; [email protected] Subject:Re: Celletra Technical review complete- RT questions below. Checklists copied below RT questions, and also attached. RT questions: 1. The output plots indicate noncompliance at the bandedge if tuned to a bandedge channel, however, no video averaging was employed, as is permitted for CDMA emissions. Please submit output plots using video averaging in order to demonstrate bandedge compliance. Answer: Please notice this is an amplifier ( or signal repeater not a BTS). 90% of amplifiers do not have bandedge channel frequency assignment, So, we have nothing to test on the bandedge channel emissions ( so as this project). 10% of amplifiers do have bandedge channel frequency assignment to associate with 2 specified BTS, only this case we need to test emissions on the bandedge channel frequency. 2. Please submit radiated spurious emissions. Answer: We ( Chris, you and me) discussed this issue several times, we do not submit radiated spur emissions for Pt.24 report ( please reff to page 4 statement which was you pepared). we do submit radiated spur emissions for Pt.15 report Please let me know if you have new idear for this issue. 3. The technical information contains an apparent discrepancy. The active antenna gain is listed as 13 dBi, so, in conjunction with a conducted output power of 33 dBm, the EIRP would be 46 dBm, or 40W. However, the technical description goes to list the EIRP as 53 dBm, or 200 W. Please clarify. Answer: I will forward this issue to the client again, because I discussed this issue with client on 5/17/01 they said they will correct this on the manual. Certification Checklist For Licensed Transmitters Applicant's Name: _Celletra___________ Test Firm: __MET Labs____ FCC ID: ___PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 ____ EA # ________ Equipment Functional Description: _PCS Repeater__________________ Equipment Class Correct (Y / N)__PCB Administrative Information Check off: a. Associated Pending Application? (Y/N)_No__ b. Confidentiality Requested? (Y / N) _Yes__ Letter with details included? (Y/N)__Yes___ c. Statement / letter supplied for special requirements or inter-agency coordination? __No________ Date of letter_________________ Technical Information (To make the Grant line entry) Enter: a. Rule Parts ___24E__________________________________ b. Frequency Range ____1930-1990___________________________ c. Power Output ____2.0 W_conducted, EIRP = ?_____________________________ (Levels - variable or switched?) _________________ Antenna connector or integral antenna__integral__________ d. Frequency Tolerance Rating ____n/a___(Repeater)_______________ 3 e. Emissions ___Authorized for use with F9W emissions__________________________________ Necessary Bandwidth Values Justified? (Y/N)_n/a______ Emission Types Justified? (Y/N) __n/a_______________ Descriptive Information (Section 2.1033(c)(1)) Check off: a. Instruction Manual ___Yes_______________________ b. DC Voltages and Currents __yes_____________________ c. Tune-up Procedure ___ yes _________________________ d. Circuit diagram / Block Diagram Yes _______________ e. Photographs: Internal__Yes__ External__Yes___ Technical Report (Sections 2.1046 thru 2.1057) Check off and compare with Radio Service Rule requirements: a. Power output: ERP or Conducted __2 W conducted, EIRP = ?________ b. Audio Frequency Response M=___n/a_______ c. Modulation Limiting D=___n/a______________ d. Audio Low Pass Filter Response Plot _n/a_____ e. Transient Frequency Response (Part 90.214) _ n/a _____ / (Attack time for Part 95 CB) _ n/a _____ f. Occupied Bandwidth plots for each emission? (Y/N)_Y____ (VBW & ResBW = __30 ______KHz) Properly Modulated (Y / N) __Y_______ g. Conducted Spurious __yes_____________________ h. Radiated Spurious ___NO_____________________ i. Frequency Stability vs. Voltage (+/- 15% or Battery Endpoint) _n/a____ j. Frequency Stability vs. Temperature (-30 to + 50 C) __n/a___________ Notes Subpart (E) - Broadband PCS 4 Is the device operating in the following operating frequency band? __yes____ Blocks from 1850 - 1990 MHz Are the following General Technical Requirements met? _ yes _____Section 24.232 - Power output (EIRP) _n/a_____Section 24.235 - Frequency Stability ? _____Section 24.238 - Emission limits Are the following Special Requirements met? __n/a____MPE or SAR evaluation required for portable and mobile units per Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093. Special Interpretations: Power output for units with built-in antenna to be listed as EIRP. Otherwise same as Cellular Marianne Bosley wrote: Just disregard anything you got there. I resent ALL documents to your mailbox here. Marianne T. Bosley EMC Administrator 410-354-3300, ext. 412 > -----Original Message…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Cellular Transmission Solutions P.O.Box 106, Tavor building 1 Yoqne’am Ilit 20692, ISRAEL Tel. + 972 4 9592522 Fax. + 972 4 9592523 E-mail: [email protected] 1 May 17 th , 2001 attn: Reviewing Engineer Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Re: Type Acceptance – Celletra Ltd – Confidentiality Requested Model : PCS Rev.3 1x4x4 Column Array Product Code: C-BPA-BMONGXNA-55 FCC ID: PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 Ladies and Gentlemen, Transmitted herewith on behalf of Celletra Ltd, is its request for confidentiality under FCC rule Section 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, Celletra Ltd requests that certain specific technical information in the application be withheld from public inspection following grant of the application because the information contains confidential business information and/or trade secrets. These items, which are marked “CONFIDENTIAL” include: 1. Technical Description and Block Diagrams. 2. Active circuit schematics and assembly drawings. 3. Internal photographs of the unit. Significant effort and resources in research, development, and product design innovation have been invested by Celletra Ltd and would be compromised if the materials for which confidentiality is requested were made available to competitors of Celletra Ltd as a result of this application. Celletra Ltd. has taken precaution measures to ensure that the customers or installers will not gain access to the Active modules internal parts. These include strict NDA agreements and Special Ceramic labels to detect any un-authorized module’s service. Accordingly, Celletra Ltd asks only that these specified items be held confidential after grant in order to maintain a fair and competitive marketplace.. If questions arise concerning this application, please contact Paul Lemson of Celletra Inc at 425-844-1210 or call me at +972-4-9593951 (e-mail: [email protected]) . Respectfully, Gideon Argaman CTO Cellular Transmission Solutions P.O.Box 106, Tavor building 1 Yoqne’am Ilit 20692, ISRAEL Tel. + 972 4 9592522 Fax. + 972 4 9592523 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Celletra Ltd. P.O.Box 106, Yoqune’am, 20692 Israel

FCC ID: PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 June 5, 2001 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Attention:Applications Examiner Applicant:Cellular Transmission Solutions P.O. Box 106, Tavor building 1, Yoqne’am Ilit 20692, ISRAEL Equipment:BEAMER Active Radiating Module System (PCS Repeater) FCC ID: PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 Specification:47 CFR, Part 24 Licensed Certification Dear Examiner: The following application for Grant of Equipment Authorization is presented on behalf of Cellular Transmission Solutions for the Licensed Certification of their BEAMER, PCS Repeater. Enclosed, please find a complete data and documentation package demonstrating that this device complies with the technical requirements of 47 CFR, Part 24, for a PCS Repeater. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned, who is authorized to act as Agent. Sincerely, Chris Harvey Director, EMC Laboratory FCC ID: PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 EMC10935- 2 -June 5, 2001 MET Laboratories, Inc. Safety Certification - EMI - Telecom Environmental Simulation 914 WEST PATAPSCO AVENUE !! BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21230-3432 !! PHONE (410) 354-3300 !! FAX (410) 354-3313 ENGINEERING TEST REPORT in support of the Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization EQUIPMENT:BEAMER Active Radiating Module System FCC ID:PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 Specification:47 CFR 24 On Behalf of the Applicant:Cellular Transmission Solutions P.O. Box 106, Tavor building 1, Yoqne’am Ilit 20692, ISRAEL Manufacturer:Cellular Transmission Solutions P.O. Box 106, Tavor building 1, Yoqne’am Ilit 20692, ISRAEL Manufacturer’s Mr. Israel Eldar Representative: Test Date(s):May 16 thru 18, 2001 ENGINEERING STATEMENT I ATTEST: the measurements shown in this report were made in accordance with the procedures indicated, and that the emissions from this equipment were found to be within the limits applicable. I assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these measurements. On the basis of the measurements made, the equipment tested is capable of operation in accordance with the requirements of Part 24 of the FCC Rules under normal use and maintenance. _____________________________ Liming Xu Project Engineer, MET Laboratories FCC ID: PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 EMC10935- 3 -June 5, 2001 1.0INTRODUCTION The following data is presented on behalf of the Applicant, Cellular Transmission Solutions as verification of the compliance of the Beamer Array ( PCS Repeater), to the requirements of 47CFR 24. 2.0TEST SITE All testing was conducted at MET Laboratories, Inc., 914 West Patapsco Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21230-3493. Radiated emissions measurements were performed on a three-meter open area test site (OATS). A complete site description is on file with the FCC Laboratory Division as 31040/SIT/MET. 3.0TEST EQUIPMENT USED ManufacturerEquipment Calibration DueCal. Interval Hewlett Packard8563A Spectrum Analyzer6/14/01annual EMCOBiconical Antenna 31043/21/02annual EMCOEMCO Log Periodic Antenna11/01/01annual EMCODouble Ridge Guided Horn2/27/02annual Hewlett Packard8546A Analyzer8/23/01annual Rhode & Swartz (X3)SMIQ 03 Digital Signal Gen.8/16/01N/A 4.0EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST CONFIGURATION The EUT was configured with DC power supply modules and a digital signal generator was used to simulate a CDMA type RF input signals to the EUT. The EUT with host external computer was configured for maximum signal gain and bandwidth. The EUT was operated in a manner representative of the typical usage of the equipment. During all testing, (with the exception of intermodulation tests), the EUT was configured for Single Channel operation which results in maximum possible output gain. 5.0TEST TYPE(S) 5.2Occupied Bandwidth: 47CFR2.1049, Input vs. Output 5.3RF Power Output: 47CFR 2.1046, 24.132(b),(c) 5.4Spurious Emission at Antenna Terminals: 47CFR 2.1051, 24.238(a) FCC ID: PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 EMC10935- 4 -June 5, 2001 Po&[43%10Log(7)]'&13dBm 6.0TEST RESULTS 6.1TEST TYPE: Radiated Emissions 6.1.1TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION:2.1053; 24.238(a) 6.1.2TEST DATE(S):May 18, 2001 6.1.3MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES: As required by 47 CFR 2.1053, field strength of spurious radiation measurements were made in accordance with the general procedures of ANSI C63.4-1992 "Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9kHz to 40 GHz". Preliminary radiated emission measurements were performed inside a shielded chamber with all digital signal generators on and terminated. The frequency list from the preliminary measurements was used as a guide for making final measurements on a 10 meter open area test site. The unit was scanned over the frequency range of 9 kHz to 20 GHz. The Radiated Spurious Emissions Limit is obtained by the following: Based on an output power (as measured at the output of the RF Amplifier) of 7 watts: P o = 7 W the radiated power level of all spurious emissions must be attenuated by at least 43 + 10log(Po) below Po, yielding: All of the measurable radiated emissions are related to the digital device portion of the EUT, and thus are compared to the 47CFR 15 Class A field strength limit. Mathematical calculations indicate that these field strengths yield radiated power levels greater than 30 dB below the -13 dBm limit for spurious emissions from the transmitter portion of the EUT calculated above. There were no observable radiated emissions from the transmitter portion of the EUT. FCC ID: PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 EMC10935- 5 -June 5, 2001 6.2TEST TYPE: Occupied Bandwidth 6.2.1TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION:47 CFR 2.1046 6.2.2TEST DATE(S):May 17, 2001 6.2.3MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES: As required by 47 CFR 2.1049, occupied bandwidth measurements were made on the PCS Repeater pre- and post- repeater. A digital signal generator was configured to transmit a CDMA carrier signal. Using an IF bandwidth of 30kHz, we determined the occupied bandwidth of the emission at the Input vs Output. 6.2.4RESULTS: Equipment complies w…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

1 Chris Harvey From: Chris Harvey Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:07 AM To: Liming Xu; Greg Czumak; Marianne Bosley Subject: RE: Celletra I agree with Liming's comments. 1) The Bandedge compliance does not apply to this device which is an amplifier, because it is dependant on the BTS that it is connected to. 2) The Radiated Spurious Emissions are listed in the report as being >30dB below the limit and thus not reported. I verified on the datasheet that this test was performed with no measurable emissions. No further testing is necessary. 3) we will get the customer to modify the manual in accordance with discussions between Liming and Israel. This spplication is ready to Grant. -----Original Message----- From:Liming Xu Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:26 PM To:Chris Harvey; Greg Czumak; Marianne Bosley Subject:RE: Celletra Please my answer follow each questions -----Original Message----- From:Marianne Bosley Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:47 PM To:Liming Xu Subject:FW: Celletra Here it is Liming, Greg said he would be back to reviewing around 9PM. his phone number is 610-380-1857. Marianne T. Bosley EMC Administrator 410-354-3300, ext. 412 -----Original Message----- From:Fr. Gregory Czumak [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:12 PM To:Marianne Bosley; [email protected] Subject:Re: Celletra Technical review complete- RT questions below. Checklists copied below RT questions, and also attached. RT questions: 1. The output plots indicate noncompliance at the bandedge if tuned to a bandedge channel, however, no video averaging was employed, as is permitted for CDMA emissions. Please submit output plots using video averaging in order to demonstrate bandedge compliance. Answer: Please notice this is an amplifier ( or signal repeater not a BTS). 90% of amplifiers do not have bandedge channel frequency assignment, So, we have nothing to test on the bandedge channel emissions ( so as this project). 10% of amplifiers do have bandedge channel frequency assignment to associate with 2 specified BTS, only this case we need to test emissions on the bandedge channel frequency. 2. Please submit radiated spurious emissions. Answer: We ( Chris, you and me) discussed this issue several times, we do not submit radiated spur emissions for Pt.24 report ( please reff to page 4 statement which was you pepared). we do submit radiated spur emissions for Pt.15 report Please let me know if you have new idear for this issue. 3. The technical information contains an apparent discrepancy. The active antenna gain is listed as 13 dBi, so, in conjunction with a conducted output power of 33 dBm, the EIRP would be 46 dBm, or 40W. However, the technical description goes to list the EIRP as 53 dBm, or 200 W. Please clarify. Answer: I will forward this issue to the client again, because I discussed this issue with client on 5/17/01 they said they will correct this on the manual. Certification Checklist For Licensed Transmitters Applicant's Name: _Celletra___________ Test Firm: __MET Labs____ FCC ID: ___PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 ____ EA # ________ Equipment Functional Description: _PCS Repeater__________________ Equipment Class Correct (Y / N)__PCB Administrative Information Check off: a. Associated Pending Application? (Y/N)_No__ b. Confidentiality Requested? (Y / N) _Yes__ Letter with details included? (Y/N)__Yes___ c. Statement / letter supplied for special requirements or inter-agency coordination? __No________ Date of letter_________________ Technical Information (To make the Grant line entry) Enter: a. Rule Parts ___24E__________________________________ b. Frequency Range ____1930-1990___________________________ c. Power Output ____2.0 W_conducted, EIRP = ?_____________________________ (Levels - variable or switched?) _________________ Antenna connector or integral antenna__integral__________ d. Frequency Tolerance Rating ____n/a___(Repeater)_______________ 3 e. Emissions ___Authorized for use with F9W emissions__________________________________ Necessary Bandwidth Values Justified? (Y/N)_n/a______ Emission Types Justified? (Y/N) __n/a_______________ Descriptive Information (Section 2.1033(c)(1)) Check off: a. Instruction Manual ___Yes_______________________ b. DC Voltages and Currents __yes_____________________ c. Tune-up Procedure ___ yes _________________________ d. Circuit diagram / Block Diagram Yes _______________ e. Photographs: Internal__Yes__ External__Yes___ Technical Report (Sections 2.1046 thru 2.1057) Check off and compare with Radio Service Rule requirements: a. Power output: ERP or Conducted __2 W conducted, EIRP = ?________ b. Audio Frequency Response M=___n/a_______ c. Modulation Limiting D=___n/a______________ d. Audio Low Pass Filter Response Plot _n/a_____ e. Transient Frequency Response (Part 90.214) _ n/a _____ / (Attack time for Part 95 CB) _ n/a _____ f. Occupied Bandwidth plots for each emission? (Y/N)_Y____ (VBW & ResBW = __30 ______KHz) Properly Modulated (Y / N) __Y_______ g. Conducted Spurious __yes_____________________ h. Radiated Spurious ___NO_____________________ i. Frequency Stability vs. Voltage (+/- 15% or Battery Endpoint) _n/a____ j. Frequency Stability vs. Temperature (-30 to + 50 C) __n/a___________ Notes Subpart (E) - Broadband PCS 4 Is the device operating in the following operating frequency band? __yes____ Blocks from 1850 - 1990 MHz Are the following General Technical Requirements met? _ yes _____Section 24.232 - Power output (EIRP) _n/a_____Section 24.235 - Frequency Stability ? _____Section 24.238 - Emission limits Are the following Special Requirements met? __n/a____MPE or SAR evaluation required for portable and mobile units per Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093. Special Interpretations: Power output for units with built-in antenna to be listed as EIRP. Otherwise same as Cellular Marianne Bosley wrote: Just disregard anything you got there. I resent ALL documents to your mailbox here. Marianne T. Bosley EMC Administrator 410-354-3300, ext. 412 > -----Original Message…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

1 Chris Harvey From: Chris Harvey Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:07 AM To: Liming Xu; Greg Czumak; Marianne Bosley Subject: RE: Celletra I agree with Liming's comments. 1) The Bandedge compliance does not apply to this device which is an amplifier, because it is dependant on the BTS that it is connected to. 2) The Radiated Spurious Emissions are listed in the report as being >30dB below the limit and thus not reported. I verified on the datasheet that this test was performed with no measurable emissions. No further testing is necessary. 3) we will get the customer to modify the manual in accordance with discussions between Liming and Israel. This spplication is ready to Grant. -----Original Message----- From:Liming Xu Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:26 PM To:Chris Harvey; Greg Czumak; Marianne Bosley Subject:RE: Celletra Please my answer follow each questions -----Original Message----- From:Marianne Bosley Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:47 PM To:Liming Xu Subject:FW: Celletra Here it is Liming, Greg said he would be back to reviewing around 9PM. his phone number is 610-380-1857. Marianne T. Bosley EMC Administrator 410-354-3300, ext. 412 -----Original Message----- From:Fr. Gregory Czumak [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:12 PM To:Marianne Bosley; [email protected] Subject:Re: Celletra Technical review complete- RT questions below. Checklists copied below RT questions, and also attached. RT questions: 1. The output plots indicate noncompliance at the bandedge if tuned to a bandedge channel, however, no video averaging was employed, as is permitted for CDMA emissions. Please submit output plots using video averaging in order to demonstrate bandedge compliance. Answer: Please notice this is an amplifier ( or signal repeater not a BTS). 90% of amplifiers do not have bandedge channel frequency assignment, So, we have nothing to test on the bandedge channel emissions ( so as this project). 10% of amplifiers do have bandedge channel frequency assignment to associate with 2 specified BTS, only this case we need to test emissions on the bandedge channel frequency. 2. Please submit radiated spurious emissions. Answer: We ( Chris, you and me) discussed this issue several times, we do not submit radiated spur emissions for Pt.24 report ( please reff to page 4 statement which was you pepared). we do submit radiated spur emissions for Pt.15 report Please let me know if you have new idear for this issue. 3. The technical information contains an apparent discrepancy. The active antenna gain is listed as 13 dBi, so, in conjunction with a conducted output power of 33 dBm, the EIRP would be 46 dBm, or 40W. However, the technical description goes to list the EIRP as 53 dBm, or 200 W. Please clarify. Answer: I will forward this issue to the client again, because I discussed this issue with client on 5/17/01 they said they will correct this on the manual. Certification Checklist For Licensed Transmitters Applicant's Name: _Celletra___________ Test Firm: __MET Labs____ FCC ID: ___PNQCBPABMONGXNA55 ____ EA # ________ Equipment Functional Description: _PCS Repeater__________________ Equipment Class Correct (Y / N)__PCB Administrative Information Check off: a. Associated Pending Application? (Y/N)_No__ b. Confidentiality Requested? (Y / N) _Yes__ Letter with details included? (Y/N)__Yes___ c. Statement / letter supplied for special requirements or inter-agency coordination? __No________ Date of letter_________________ Technical Information (To make the Grant line entry) Enter: a. Rule Parts ___24E__________________________________ b. Frequency Range ____1930-1990___________________________ c. Power Output ____2.0 W_conducted, EIRP = ?_____________________________ (Levels - variable or switched?) _________________ Antenna connector or integral antenna__integral__________ d. Frequ…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.