PX9M101PH002Rugged Tablet PC

Please read these instructions carefully before using this product, and save this manual for future use. M101P-LA Rugged Windows Tablet Intel® Apollo Lake Pentium N4200 Windows 10 IoT Enterprise User Guide Version 1.2 2 M101P Rugged Tablet User Guide Contents CHAPTER 1: READ ME FIRST ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 ADVISORY CONVENTIONS 4 1.2 SAFETY INFORMATION 5 1.3 HANDLING AND MAINTENANCE 7 1.4 DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY (DOC) 8 CHAPTER 2: GETTING STARTED ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 INTRODUCTION 9 2.2 UNPACKING 10 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PARTS 11 2.4 HOTKEY FOR SPECIFIC FUNCTIONS 13 2.5 FIRST-TIME OPERATION 13 2.5.1 Installing SIM Card (For 3G/LTE Equipped Devices) ................................................................................................. 14 2.5.2 Installing a Micro SD Card ....................................................................................................................................... 15 2.5.3 Installing Battery ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.5.4 Charging Your Tablet ............................................................................................................................................... 16 2.5.5 Starting the Tablet ................................................................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 3: SETTING UP WINDOWS FOR THE FIRST TIME ...................................................................................... 17 3.1 INTRODUCTION 17 3.2 SETTING UP WINDOWS 10 IOT ENTERPRISE 17 CHAPTER 4: OPERATING THE DEVICE ...................................................................................................................... 20 4.1 HOTTAB INTRODUCTION 20 4.2 SHORTCUTS 21 4.3 USING CAMERA 21 4.4 BUILT-IN DEVICES ON/OFF 23 4.4.1 Using the Wireless LAN (Wi-Fi) ................................................................................................................................ 23 4.4.2 Using the Wireless WAN (3G/LTE) ........................................................................................................................... 24 4.4.3 Using the GPS .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 4.4.4 Using the Bluetooth ................................................................................................................................................. 24 4.4.5 Turning On/Off LED Indicators................................................................................................................................. 25 4.4.6 Using the Barcode Reader ....................................................................................................................................... 25 4.4.7 Using the HF RFID Reader ........................................................................................................................................ 33 4.4.8 Turn on/off the GPS External Antenna .................................................................................................................... 38 4.4.9 Turn on/off the Light Sensor .................................................................................................................................... 38 4.4.10 Changing Touchscreen Modes ............................................................................................................................... 39 4.4.11 Using the Expansion Module ................................................................................................................................. 41 4.4.12 UHF RFID Reader Module ...................................................................................................................................... 42 4.5 SETTINGS 47 4.5.1 PC Information ......................................................................................................................................................... 47 4.5.2 Battery Information ................................................................................................................................................. 47 4.5.3 Using the Physical Function Keys (Hotkeys) ............................................................................................................. 48 CHAPTER 5: FREQUENTLY USED SETTINGS .............................................................................................................. 49 5.1 SCREEN RESOLUTION SCALING AND SETTING 49 5.1.1 Changing Display Scaling (Recommended) ............................................................................................................. 49 5.1.2 Changing Screen Resolution .................................................................................................................................... 50 5.2 REPLACING BATTERY 52 5.3 USING RECOVERY WIZARD TO RESTORE COMPUTER 53 5.4 DOCKING CONNECTOR PIN DEFINITION 55 5.5 EXPANSION PORT PIN DEFINITION 55 5.6 COM PORT DEFINITION 56 5.7 PAIRING WITH A WIRELESS BLUETOOTH BARCODE SCANNER 58 5.7.1 Setup Computer for Bluetooth Pairing .................................................................................................................... 58 5.7.2 Set up the Barcode Scanner for Bluetooth Pairing .................................................................................................. 62 3 Contents 5.7.3 Perform Bluetooth Pairing ....................................................................................................................................... 62 CHAPTER 6: TROUBLESHOOTING ............…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

FCC Software Configuration Control Declaration Rev1.1.docx Winmate Inc. FCC Software Configuration Control Declaration Date: 2020-05-12 Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Attn: Winmate Inc. Product Name: Rugged Tablet PC Model Number(s): M101P-LA, RT10W-L10,M101PXXXXXXXXXX (Where X can be A-Z,a-z ,0-9,”-“, Blank or Slash) Regarding FCC Country Code Selection guidelines identified in KDB 594280. “All applications for equipment authorization for transmitters that can have radio parameters, or other technical parameters, reported to the Commission set by software must have an attestation indicating that no third party will have software, or configuration control, to program the device out of compliance of the technical rules under which it has been certified.” We declare that no third party will have software, or configuration control, to program the device out of compliance of the technical rules under which it has been certified. Name: Chini Liao Date: 2020-05-12 Title: R&D Manager Signatureof applicant

Winmate Inc. Agent Authorization Company: Winmate Inc. Address: 9F, No.111-6, Shing-De Rd., San-Chung Dist., New Taipei City, 24158, Taiwan, R.O.C Product Name: Rugged Tablet PC Model Number(s): M101P-LA, RT10W-L10,M101PXXXXXXXXXX (Where X can be A-Z,a-z ,0-9,”-“, Blank or Slash) Product Description: Rugged Tablet PC We authorize MiCOM Labs Inc., 575 Boulder Court, Pleasanton, California 94566, USA, to act on our behalf on all matters concerning the certification of above named equipment. We declare that MiCOM Labs Inc. is allowed to forward all information related to the approval and certification of equipment to the regulatory agencies as required and to discuss any issues concerning the approval application. Any and all acts carried out by MiCOM Labs on our behalf shall have the same effect as acts of our own. Signature: Date: 2020-05-12 Name: Chini Liao Title: R&D Manager Company: Winmate Inc.

Differences Description We Winmate Inc. state: Product： Rugged Tablet PC Model Name： M101P-LA,RT10W-L10,M101PXXXXXXXXXX (Where X can be A-Z,a-z ,0-9,”-“, Blank or Slash) Trade Name: Winmate FCC ID: PX9M101PH002 The electrical circuit design, layout, components used and internal wiring for above models are identical, only difference for marketing purpose Signatory Date 2020-5-13 Signature Name: Chini Liao Title: R&D Manager Company: Winmate Inc. Address: 9F, No.111-6, Shing-De Rd., San-Chung Dist., New Taipei City, 24158, Taiwan, R.O.C

Winmate Inc. Office of Engineering Technology Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 USA Date: 2020-05-12 Subject; Request for Confidentiality FCC ID: PX9M101PH002 To Whom It May Concern, Pursuant to the provisions of the Commission’s rules Title 47 Sections §0.457 and §0.459, we are requesting the Commission to withhold the following attachment(s) as confidential documents from public disclosure indefinitely. These documents contain detailed system and equipment descriptions and are considered as proprietary information in operation of the equipment. The public disclosure of these documents might be harmful to our company and would give competitors an unfair advantage in the market. Schematic Diagram Block Diagram Operational Description Tune-up Procedure SOFTWARE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR U-NII DEVICES Part List In additional to above mentioned documents, in order to comply with the marketing regulations in Title 47 CFR §2.803 and the importation rules in Title 47 CFR §2.1204, while ensuring that business sensitive information remains confidential until the actual marketing of newly authorized devices, we request Short Term Confidentiality of the following attachment(s); External Photos Test Setup Photos Internal Photos User Manual For 45 days, pursuant to Public Notice DA 04-1705. OR For 180 days pursuant to KDB 726920 D01. It is our understanding that all measurement test reports, FCC ID label format and correspondence during the certification review process cannot be granted as confidential documents and this information will be available for public review once the grant of equipment authorization is issued. Sincerely, Signature: Name: Winmate Inc. Winmate Inc. Title: R&D Manager

Page 1 of 5 Report No.: STS2001236 APPENDIX-PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS Model: M101P-LA Photo 1 Photo 2 Page 2 of 5 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 3 Photo 4 Page 3 of 5 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 5 Photo 6 Page 4 of 5 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 7 Photo 8 Page 5 of 5 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 9

FCC&IC Label Sticker: 4 * 6 cm

Page 1 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 APPENDIX-PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS Model: M101P-LA Photo 1 Photo 2 BT/WIF Antenna A GPS/GLONASS Antenna WIFI Antenna B WCDMA/LTE RX Antenna WCDMA/LTE TX Antenna Page 2 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 3 Photo 4 Page 3 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 5 Photo 6 Page 4 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 7 Photo 8 Page 5 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 9 Photo 10 Page 6 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 11 Photo 12 Page 7 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 13 Photo 14 Page 8 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 15 Photo 16 Page 9 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 17 Photo 18 Page 10 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 19 Photo 20 Page 11 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 21 Photo 22 Page 12 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 23 Photo 24 Page 13 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 25 Photo 26 Page 14 of 14 Report No.: STS2001236 Photo 27 Photo 28

Any reproduction of this document must be done in full. No single part of this document may be reproduced without permission from STS, All Test Data Presented in this report is only applicable to presented Test sample. ShenZhen STS Test Services Co.,Ltd. A 1/F, Building B, Zhuoke Science Park, No.190 Chongqing Road, HepingShequ, Fuyong Sub-District, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guang Dong, China TEL: +86-755 3688 6288 FAX: +86-755 3688 6277 E-mail:[email protected] S T L A B S Testing Engineer : (Aaron Bu) Technical Manager : (Jason Lu) Authorized Signatory : (Vita Li) SAR Dipole Performance Measurement Report EUT Type： SAR Validation Dipole and Waveguide Model Name： DIP0G750-331, DIP0G835-332, DIP1G800-329 DIP1G900-333, DIP 2G450-335, DIP2G600-336 WAG32 Brand Name: SATIMO Test Conclusion： Pass Test Date： 14 Aug. 2019~16 Aug. 2019 Date of Issue： 17 Aug. 2019 ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. 1. Equipment List Kind of Equipment Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Last Calibration Calibrated Until PC Acer N/A N/A N/A N/A E-Field Probe MVG SSE5 SN 14/16 EP309 2018.12.13 2019.12.12 Dielectric Probe Kit MVG SCLMP SN 32/14 OCPG67 2018.12.01 2019.11.30 Phantom1 MVG SAM SN 32/14 SAM115 N/A N/A Phantom2 MVG SAM SN 32/14 SAM116 N/A N/A Attenuator Agilent 99899 DC-18GHz N/A N/A Directional coupler Narda 4226-20 3305 N/A N/A Network Analyzer Agilent 8753ES US38432810 2019.03.02 2020.03.01 Multi Meter Keithley Multi Meter 2000 4050073 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 Signal Generator Agilent N5182A MY50140530 2018.10.16 2019.10.15 Power Amplifier DESAY ZHL-42W 9638 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 Power Meter R&S NRP 100510 2018.10.26 2019.10.25 Power Sensor R&S NRP-Z11 101919 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 Power Sensor Agilent E9301A MY41497725 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 hygrothermograph MiEO HH660 N/A 2018.10.11 2019.10.10 Thermograph Elitech RC-4 S/N EF7176501537 2018.10.15 2019.10.14 ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. 2.<Justification of the extended calibration> Referring to KDB 865664 D01, if dipoles are verified in return loss<-20dB, (within 20% of prior calibration),and in impedance (within 5 ohm of prior calibration), the annual calibration is not necessary and the calibration interval can be extended. Body 750 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -27.21 - 51.3 - 2018.08.15 -26.44 -2.82 51.50 0.20 2019.08.14 -26.17 -1.02 52.89 1.39 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 750 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 835 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -23.87 - 49.0 - 2018.08.15 -22.21 -6.95 52.59 3.59 2019.08.14 -24.25 9.19 52.65 0.06 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 835MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 1800 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -24.59 - 48.8 - 2018.08.16 -24.95 1.46 45.42 -3.38 2019.08.15 -26.77 7.29 46.31 0.79 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 1800 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 1900 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -20.22 - 48.8 - 2018.08.16 -23.26 15.03 47.11 -1.79 2019.08.15 -24.15 3.83 48.71 1.60 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 1900 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 2450 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -32.75 - 48.8 - 2018.08.16 -31.06 -5.16 45.61 -3.19 2019.08.16 -30.52 -1.74 46.33 0.72 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 2450 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 2600 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -24.18 - 45.7 - 2018.08.16 -23.36 -7.52 46.79 1.09 2019.08.16 -23.02 -1.46 44.37 -2.42 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 2600 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 5000 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 < -13.94 - - - 2018.08.16 -14.41 - - - 2019.08.16 -14.61 - - - The return loss is <-8dB, within 20% of prior calibration; Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 5000MHz

Any reproduction of this document must be done in full. No single part of this document may be reproduced without permission from STS, All Test Data Presented in this report is only applicable to presented Test sample. ShenZhen STS Test Services Co.,Ltd. A 1/F, Building B, Zhuoke Science Park, No.190 Chongqing Road, HepingShequ, Fuyong Sub-District, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guang Dong, China TEL: +86-755 3688 6288 FAX: +86-755 3688 6277 E-mail:[email protected] S T L A B S Testing Engineer : (Aaron Bu) Technical Manager : (Jason Lu) Authorized Signatory : (Vita Li) SAR Dipole Performance Measurement Report EUT Type： SAR Validation Dipole and Waveguide Model Name： DIP0G750-331, DIP0G835-332, DIP1G800-329 DIP1G900-333, DIP 2G450-335, DIP2G600-336 WAG32 Brand Name: SATIMO Test Conclusion： Pass Test Date： 14 Aug. 2019~16 Aug. 2019 Date of Issue： 17 Aug. 2019 ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. 1. Equipment List Kind of Equipment Manufacturer Type No. Serial No. Last Calibration Calibrated Until PC Acer N/A N/A N/A N/A E-Field Probe MVG SSE5 SN 14/16 EP309 2018.12.13 2019.12.12 Dielectric Probe Kit MVG SCLMP SN 32/14 OCPG67 2018.12.01 2019.11.30 Phantom1 MVG SAM SN 32/14 SAM115 N/A N/A Phantom2 MVG SAM SN 32/14 SAM116 N/A N/A Attenuator Agilent 99899 DC-18GHz N/A N/A Directional coupler Narda 4226-20 3305 N/A N/A Network Analyzer Agilent 8753ES US38432810 2019.03.02 2020.03.01 Multi Meter Keithley Multi Meter 2000 4050073 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 Signal Generator Agilent N5182A MY50140530 2018.10.16 2019.10.15 Power Amplifier DESAY ZHL-42W 9638 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 Power Meter R&S NRP 100510 2018.10.26 2019.10.25 Power Sensor R&S NRP-Z11 101919 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 Power Sensor Agilent E9301A MY41497725 2018.10.13 2019.10.12 hygrothermograph MiEO HH660 N/A 2018.10.11 2019.10.10 Thermograph Elitech RC-4 S/N EF7176501537 2018.10.15 2019.10.14 ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. 2.<Justification of the extended calibration> Referring to KDB 865664 D01, if dipoles are verified in return loss<-20dB, (within 20% of prior calibration),and in impedance (within 5 ohm of prior calibration), the annual calibration is not necessary and the calibration interval can be extended. Body 750 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -27.21 - 51.3 - 2018.08.15 -26.44 -2.82 51.50 0.20 2019.08.14 -26.17 -1.02 52.89 1.39 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 750 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 835 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -23.87 - 49.0 - 2018.08.15 -22.21 -6.95 52.59 3.59 2019.08.14 -24.25 9.19 52.65 0.06 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 835MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 1800 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -24.59 - 48.8 - 2018.08.16 -24.95 1.46 45.42 -3.38 2019.08.15 -26.77 7.29 46.31 0.79 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 1800 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 1900 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -20.22 - 48.8 - 2018.08.16 -23.26 15.03 47.11 -1.79 2019.08.15 -24.15 3.83 48.71 1.60 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 1900 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 2450 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -32.75 - 48.8 - 2018.08.16 -31.06 -5.16 45.61 -3.19 2019.08.16 -30.52 -1.74 46.33 0.72 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 2450 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 2600 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 -24.18 - 45.7 - 2018.08.16 -23.36 -7.52 46.79 1.09 2019.08.16 -23.02 -1.46 44.37 -2.42 The return loss is <-20dB, within 20% of prior calibration; the impedance is within 5 ohm of prior calibration. Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 2600 MHz ISSUED BY Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Body 5000 MHz Date of Measurement Return Loss (dB) Delta (%) Impedance Delta(ohm) 2017.08.15 < -13.94 - - - 2018.08.16 -14.41 - - - 2019.08.16 -14.61 - - - The return loss is <-8dB, within 20% of prior calibration; Therefore the verification result should support extended calibration. <Dipole Verification Data> Body 5000MHz

Ref : ACR.345.3.19.SATU.A SHENZHEN STS TEST SERVICES CO., LTD. 1/F, BUILDING 2, ZHUOKE SCIENCE PARK, CHONGQING ROAD FUYONG, BAO’ AN DISTRICT, SHENZHEN,CHINA MVG COMOSAR DOSIMETRIC E-FIELD PROBE SERIAL NO.: SN 41/18 EPGO334 Calibrated at MVG US 2105 Barrett Park Dr. - Kennesaw, GA 30144 Calibration Date: 06/04/2019 Summary: This document presents the method and results from an accredited COMOSAR Dosimetric E-Field Probe calibration performed in MVG USA using the CALISAR / CALIBAIR test bench, for use with a COMOSAR system only. All calibration results are traceable to national metrology institutions. COMOSAR E-Field Probe Calibration Report COMOSAR E-FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.345.3.19.SATU.A Page: 2/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval of MVG. The information contained herein is to be used only for the purpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole or part without written approval of MVG. Name Function Date Signature Prepared by : Jérôme LUC Product Manager 12/11/2019 Checked by : Jérôme LUC Product Manager 12/11/2019 Approved by : Kim RUTKOWSKI Quality Manager 12/11/2019 Customer Name Distribution : Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. Issue Date Modifications A 12/11/2019 Initial release COMOSAR E-FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.345.3.19.SATU.A Page: 3/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval of MVG. The information contained herein is to be used only for the purpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole or part without written approval of MVG. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Device Under Test ..................................................................................................... 4 2 Product Description ................................................................................................... 4 2.1 General Information _______________________________________________________ 4 3 Measurement Method ................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Linearity ________________________________________________________________ 4 3.2 Sensitivity _______________________________________________________________ 5 3.3 Lower Detection Limit _____________________________________________________ 5 3.4 Isotropy _________________________________________________________________ 5 3.5 Boundary Effect __________________________________________________________ 5 4 Measurement Uncertainty .......................................................................................... 5 5 Calibration Measurement Results .............................................................................. 6 5.1 Sensitivity in air __________________________________________________________ 6 5.2 Linearity ________________________________________________________________ 7 5.3 Sensitivity in liquid ________________________________________________________ 7 5.4 Isotropy _________________________________________________________________ 8 6 List of Equipment .................................................................................................... 10 COMOSAR E-FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.345.3.19.SATU.A Page: 4/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval of MVG. The information contained herein is to be used only for the purpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole or part without written approval of MVG. 1 DEVICE UNDER TEST Device Under Test Device Type COMOSAR DOSIMETRIC E FIELD PROBE Manufacturer MVG Model SSE2 Serial Number SN 41/18 EPGO334 Product Condition (new / used) New Frequency Range of Probe 0.45 GHz-6GHz Resistance of Three Dipoles at Connector Dipole 1: R1=0.191 M Dipole 2: R2=0.216 M Dipole 3: R3=0.197 M A yearly calibration interval is recommended. 2 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION MVG’s COMOSAR E field Probes are built in accordance to the IEEE 1528 and CEI/IEC 62209 standards. Figure 1 – MVG COMOSAR Dosimetric E field Dipole Probe Length 330 mm Length of Individual Dipoles 2 mm Maximum external diameter 8 mm Probe Tip External Diameter 2.5 mm Distance between dipoles / probe extremity 1 mm 3 MEASUREMENT METHOD The IEEE 1528 and CEI/IEC 62209 standards provide recommended practices for the probe calibrations, including the performance characteristics of interest and methods by which to assess their affect. All calibrations / measurements performed meet the fore mentioned standards. 3.1 LINEARITY The evaluation of the linearity was done in free space using the waveguide, performing a power sweep to cover the SAR range 0.01W/kg to 100W/kg. COMOSAR E-FIELD PROBE CALIBRATION REPORT Ref: ACR.345.3.19.SATU.A Page: 5/10 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full or in part, without the written approval of MVG. The information contained herein is to be used only for the purpose for which it is submitted and is not to be released in whole or part without written approval of MVG. 3.2 SENSITIVITY The sensitivity factors of the three dipoles were determined using a two step calibration method (air and tissue simulating liquid) using waveguides as outlined in the standards. 3.3 LOWER DETECTION LIMIT The lower detection limit was assessed using the same measurement set up as used for the linearity measurement. The required lower detection limit is 10 mW/kg. 3.4 ISOTROPY The axial isotropy was evaluated by exposing the probe to a reference wave from a standard dipole with the dipole mounted under the flat phantom in the test configuration suggested for system validations and checks. The probe was rotated along its main axis from 0 - 360 degrees in 15 degree steps. The hemispherical isotropy is determined by inserting the probe in a thin plastic box filled with tissue-equivalent liquid, with the plastic box illuminated with the fields from a half wave dipole. The…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Any reproduction of this document must be done in full. No single part of this document may be reproduced without permission from STS, All Test Data Presented in this report is only applicable to presented Test sample. ShenZhen STS Test Services Co.,Ltd. A 1/F, Building B, Zhuoke Science Park, No.190 Chongqing Road, HepingShequ, Fuyong Sub-District, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, Guang Dong, China TEL: +86-755 3688 6288 FAX: +86-755 3688 6277 E-mail:[email protected] FCC SAR TEST REPORT Report No.: STS2001236H02 Issued for Winmate Inc. 9F, No.111-6, Shing-De Rd., San-Chung Dist., New Taipei City, 24158, Taiwan, R.O.C Product Name: Rugged Tablet PC Brand Name: Winmate Model Name: M101P-LA Series Model: RT10W-L10,M101PXXXXXXXXXX (Where X can be A-Z,a-z ,0-9,”-“, Blank or Slash) FCC ID: PX9M101PH002 Test Standard: ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1 FCC 47 CFR Part 2 ( 2.1093) IEEE 1528: 2013 Max. Report SAR (1g): Body: 1.345 W/kg S T L A B S Page 2 of 149 Report No.: STS2001236H02 Test Report Certification Applicant’s name ................. : Winmate Inc. Address ................................. : 9F, No.111-6, Shing-De Rd., San-Chung Dist., New Taipei City, 24158, Taiwan, R.O.C Manufacture's Name ............ : Winmate Inc. Address ................................. : 9F, No.111-6, Shing-De Rd., San-Chung Dist., New Taipei City, 24158, Taiwan, R.O.C Product description Product name ........................ : Rugged Tablet PC Brand name ......................... : Winmate Model name ......................... : M101P-LA Series Model .......................... : RT10W-L10,M101PXXXXXXXXXX (Where X can be A-Z,a-z ,0-9,”-“, Blank or Slash) Standards ............................. : ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1992 FCC 47 CFR Part 2 ( 2.1093) IEEE 1528: 2013 The device was tested by Shenzhen STS Test Services Co., Ltd. in accordance with the measurement methods and procedures specified in KDB 865664 The test results in this report apply only to the tested sample of the stated device/equipment. Other simila…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.