QTLRH-74GSM 850/1900 Cellular Telephone

 /PLJBBOE/PLJB 6TFS(VJEF  *TTVF  -&(" -* /'0 3." 5*0 / 1"3 5/0  * TT VF/0  $PQZS JHIU¦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…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

 /PLJB6TFS(VJEFVQEBUFGPS /PSUI"NFSJDB "EEJUJPOBMJOGPSNBUJPOBCPVUUIF/PLJBQIPOFJTEFTDSJCFEJOUIJTVQEBUF 'PSDPNQMFUFJOGPSNBUJPOBCPVUPUIFSQIPOFGFBUVSFTBOEJNQPSUBOUTBGFUZBOE NBJOUFOBODFJOGPSNBUJPO SFGFSUPZPVS/PLJB6TFS(VJEF ■)FBSJOHBJEDPNQBUJCJMJUZ : PVSNPCJMF EFW JDF NPEF MDPNQM JFT XJUI '$ $ SV MFT HPWF SOJO HI FBSJO HBJE D PNQBUJCJMJ UZ 5 IF TF SVMF TSF RVJSF BO . N JDSPQI POF P SI JHIF SW BMVF :PV S /PL JB IBT BO .WBMVF  5I F.W BMVF BMTP T IPX OPO U IFEF WJD FCPY SF GFST  U PMPX F SSBEJP GSF RVF OD Z&3 ' FN JTT JPO T "I JHIF S.WBMVF HFO FSBMMZ JO EJDBUF T  U IBUBEF WJD FN PEFMIBT BMP XF S3' FNJ TT JPOT MFW FM XI JDI N BZJNQSPW FUI F MJL FMJ IPPEUIBUUI FEF WJD FX JMMPQFSBUF XJU IDF SUBJOIF BSJOHBJET 4PNF IF BSJO H BJET BSFNPSF JNN VOF UIBOPUI FST BSFUPJOU FSGF SFO DF 1MF BT F DPOT VMU Z PVS I FBSJOH I FBMUI QSP GFT TJP OBMUPEFUF SNJO FUI F.SBUJOHPGZPV SIFBSJO HBJEBOE X IF UIF SZPV SI FBSJOHBJEX JMMXPSL XJUI UIJT EFW JDF .PSF JOGPSNBUJPO PO BD DF TT JCJMJUZ DBOCF GPV OEBUXX X O PLJBBDD FT TJC JMJUZ DPN  /PLJB*O D  8 PPEMBOE$ PSQPSBUF# MWE 4 VJUF   5BNQB'-  5FMF QIPO F   /0, *" 6&     'BDT JNJMF      55: 5% %6T FST   /0 ,* "&     X XX  OPLJBV TB DPN XX X O PLJBIPX UP DPN 1SJ OUF EJ O64"7 FST JPO   

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 September 26, 2005 RE: FCC ID: QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 Attention: Robert Binder I have a few comments on this Application. Please note that further comments may arise in response to answers provided to the questions below. 1. Please note that the FCC requires that certain HAC information be provided in the manual when the phone is HAC compatible. Please note that in a review of the manual there is no apparent reference to the HAC other that the statement on page 64(pdf page) that says, “Some digital wireless devices may interfere with some hearing aids. If interference occurs consult your service provider.” Please not that this does not meet the FCC required statement for HAC. Please note that the FCC has stated the following minimum information must be provided to the end user (this can be in the manual or label): a) explains the HAC rating system for both WD and hearing aids and their use as a pair. b) explains how to use the device including specific instructions about antenna positioning if applicable i.e. “the antenna should be extended for best compatibility...”. c) provides details of any special user selectable HAC modes. Acceptable modes might be back light off, BT off, Tcoil on, and similar. (RF power cannot be reduced and basic phone functionality must be preserved.) d) Provide the M rating of the device (in this case M3). Please provide a manual that addresses HAC requirements above. If this information is in the manual, please point to the specific page. 2. Please note that your listed uncertainty in the HAC report includes certain items that do not seem appropriate for the type measurement. For example the table includes certain SAR related issues such as phantom thickness, power drift etc and yet seems to leave out certain other HAC related issues. Please provide an uncertainty table that addresses only the HAC measurement. 3. Please note also that the FCC has stated that the expanded uncertainty is to be under 2dB. Please also note that in the table it appears that the uncertainty may exceed 3dB. This may be due to the use of unrelated SAR data. Please recalculate your measurement uncertainty for only the measurements involved. 4. Please note that the FCC generally questions measurement grids larger than 2mm. The HAC report does not appear to state the actual step size used. Please provide information on the step size used during testing. 5. Please note that it is not clear from the HAC report as to how large of a step size was used. Please note that a 5mm step, because of the uncertainty, may be too large and a smaller (i.e. 2mm) step size should be considered. Please explain and justify the step size used in the HAC measurement process. Dennis Ward mailto:[email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. z Page 2 September 26, 2005 Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 1 (1) 28-Sept-2005 Reply to ATCB comments Reference from ATCB: RE: FCC ID: QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 dated September 26, 2005 1) Regarding HAC information in the users guide, please refer to the newly uploaded document “RH-74_HAC_Add_27Sep05.pdf”, which will be added to the actual users guide. 2) Phantom thickness means test arch thickness. Software is defining distance between DUT and the probe using test arch thickness. For HAC and SAR some of the uncertainty components are the same. All the uncertainty components mentioned are relevant for HAC. 3) Uncertainty of E-field is 14.8% = 1.2 dB 4) 5mm step size is used during testing. 5) The default grid resolution is 5mm, and is refined using the interpolation algorithm (1mm grid size). This is also applied in the postprocessor. The uncertainty evaluation has been made using 5 mm grid resolution and leads to uncertainty less than 2 dB.

QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 1 (3) 30-Sept-2005 Reply to ATCB comments Reference from ATCB: e-mail dated September 29, 2005 Subject: QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 1) Regarding HAC information in the users guide, please refer to the uploaded document “RH- 74_HAC_6061_Add_29Sep05.pdf”. M rating was added. 2) We are using Hearing Aid Compatibility measurement software and instrumentation of SPEAG (Schmid & Partner Engineering AG). The specially designed Test Arch allows a high precision positioning of both the device and any of the calibration dipoles. In the SPEAG Manual and in the SPEAG software the Test Arch is named "Test Arch phantom" or only "Phantom". This may be misleading, because HAC measurement is not done in a phantom (or in a liquid and in a phantom, as it is in a case of SAR measurement). HAC measurement is done in air and Test Arch is used only for positioning WD or dipole. Test Arch itself is positioned on a stable surface (e.g. on a table). For improved user friendliness a predifined configuration file of the Test Arch is provided by SPEAG. Please see also the photo below: QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 2 (3) 30-Sept-2005 - Test Arch has yellow bottom plate, red top frames (two parallel frames with yellow markings, and one middle bar), and the dielectric wire, which is parallel with longer red top frames and perpendicular to the red middle bar. - Yellow markings on the red top frames are the reference points. The reference points define the 5 by 5 cm area with respect to the x- and y-axis with the origin in the center. The reference points are taught to the probe. - The z-coordinate of this plane is located at the known nominal height above the yellow base plate of the Test Arch. - WD is mounted in so, that íts accoustic output is coinciding with the center point of the area formed by the dielectric wire and the middle bar of the Test Arch's red top frame. - Based on the certain position of the WD in respect to the Test Arch and on the known reference points of the Test Arch, the accurate distance between WD and probe's measuring element can be defined and used during HAC measurements. 3) In our response we considered uncertainty as uncertainty on field, not on power. However, the Standard is seeing HAC RF measurement as RF emission measurement. So, Expanded Uncertainty on Power is 29.4%. At this moment we are willing to use an uncertainty calculation based on the manufacturer's and software owner's recommendations. Later we are going to review it by using our own experiments. The first repeated measurements are planned to start this autumn. 4) SPEAG recommends measuring step size of 5mm. Please, see their arguments below: "We have performed multiple comparison measurements with different resolutions of 5mm and 2mm in the context of dipole and calibration measurements.. DASY4 HAC field results are INTERPOLATED based on the field components on the measurement grid. We were not able to find any difference in the evaluation (3 digit results) , i.e. the influence of a finer resolution was neglectable. Wireless devices use different antennas. The RF wavelength and measurement distance is however not principally different from the dipole, so we do not expect field variations stronger than with a dipole antenna for the field MAXIMA. For field minima, the resolution might be a limiting factor, but these are not relevant. For these, also the resolution of the single probe sensors with their displacement in the order of magnitude above 1mm has a similar influence. The uncertainty due to the sensor displacement for the maxima is considered and included in the uncertainty budget. Consequently, we do not expect any negative influence using the our recommended step size of 5mm." QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 3 (3) 30-Sept-2005 From: ext Dward ATCB [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:37 AM To: Binder Robert (Nokia-TP/Tokyo) Cc: 'William H. Graff (E-mail)' Subject: QTLRH-74_ATCB002798 Hi Robert Please note the following in regards to your responses. 1 The HAC insert does give some information on what HAC is all about, but it does not state what the Mating of the particular device is. The insert should state/indicate the device is an M3 rated device. 2 Please note that HAC is an in air measurement and a phantom is not used in HAC testing and therefore is not an appropriate uncertainty consideration. 3 Please note that you list the Combined Standard Uncertainty as 14.7%. This however is the uncertainty before the K factor producing the expanded uncertainty is introduced. In typical expanded uncertainties used in the EMC industry the K factor is 2, thus the expanded uncertainty would be 29.4% or about 2.3dB (a little higher than the FCC wants to see). Please explain why the combined uncertainty was used in your response and why the expanded uncertainty was not used. 4 Please consider that the FCC will most likely have questions about the 5mm step size and will most likely require a 2mm step size be done. Please note that this is what the FCC appears to be doing and is doing on at least one other Nokia HAC submittal. Thanks Dennis Ward Evaluation Engineer American TCB Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com 703‐847‐4700 fax 703‐847‐6888 direct ‐ 703‐880‐4841 or 209‐966‐2145 NOTICE: This E‐Mail message and any attachment may contain privileged or company proprietary information. If you received this message in error, please return to the sender.

NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974). News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: September 8, 2005 Chelsea Fallon: (202) 418-7991 FCC PROVIDES TEMPORARY RELIEF FROM HEARING AID COMPATABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR WIRELESS CARRIERS OFFERING DUAL-BAND GSM HANDSETS WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a Memorandum Opinion and Order (Order) released today, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) provided temporary, conditional relief from certain hearing aid compatibility requirements for carriers and manufacturers that offer dual- band digital wireless handsets that use the GSM air interface in both the 850 MHz cellular and 1900 MHz broadband PCS bands. The FCC’s hearing aid compatibility rules require that, by September 16, 2005, wireless handset manufacturers must offer to carriers – and that wireless carriers and service providers must offer to their customers – at least two hearing aid-compatible handsets per air interface. In addition, nationwide (Tier I) wireless carriers must offer, per air interface, four hearing aid- compatible digital wireless handset models, or 25% of the total number of digital wireless handset models offered by the carrier nationwide must be hearing aid compatible, by September 16, 2005. In August 2005, the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) Hearing Aid Compatibility Incubator Working Group 9, a technical group that focuses on hearing aid compatibility in wireless GSM handsets and includes representatives from the wireless industry, as well as the hearing aid industry and hearing disabled community, asked the FCC to temporarily base the hearing aid compatibility compliance rating of dual-band GSM handsets on their operation in the 1900 MHz band only, rather than on their operation in both the 850 MHz and 1900 MHz bands. In addition, Cingular Wireless LLC (Cingular), a nationwide wireless carrier that exclusively offers dual-band GSM handsets that operate in the 850 MHz and 1900 MHz frequency bands, requested a waiver of Commission’s requirement that nationwide carriers offer at least four hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handsets to consumers by September 16, 2005. ATIS and Cingular indicated that hearing aid compatibility in the 850 MHz band is currently technologically infeasible. In today’s Order, the FCC, pursuant to its waiver authority, adopted Working Group 9’s recommendation and ruled that, until August 1, 2006, it will base the hearing aid compatibility compliance rating of dual-mode GSM handsets on their operation in the 1900 MHz band only. This action applies to all handset manufacturers, wireless carriers and service providers that offer 2 dual-band GSM handsets that operate in both the 850 MHz and 1900 MHz bands. In adopting Working Group 9’s recommendation, the FCC also granted, in part and with conditions, Cingular’s request for waiver of the FCC’s hearing aid compatibility rules. In addition, the FCC imposed conditions on Cingular and any other entity that elects to take advantage of the relief provided in today’s Order. Such entities must take the following actions: • Notify the FCC of their decision to avail themselves of the relief provided in today’s Order in their hearing aid compatibility compliance reports due November 17, 2005. • Provide detailed information on the status of their efforts to provide dual-band handsets that will be hearing aid-compatible in the 850 MHz band as well as the 1900 MHz band in both their November 17, 2005, and May 17, 2006, hearing aid compatibility compliance reports. • Ensure a 30-day trial period or otherwise adopt an acceptable, flexible return policy for consumers seeking to obtain hearing aid-compatible GSM handsets. • Take reasonable steps to make current technical and anecdotal information available to the public regarding the hearing aid compatibility of specific GSM handsets. Cingular must also file an additional report with the FCC by February 1, 2006, that provides detailed information on the status of its efforts to offer dual-band handsets that will be hearing aid-compatible in the 850 MHz band as well as the 1900 MHz band. Today’s action is consistent with the FCC’s goal of bringing the benefits of digital wireless telecommunications to the millions of Americans with hearing loss. Action by the Commission on September 7, 2005, by Memorandum Opinion and Order (FCC 05-166). Chairman Martin, Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, and Adelstein. Attached is a statement issued by Commissioner Copps. For additional information, contact Angela Giancarlo at (202) 418-0680 or [email protected], Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. WT Docket No. 01-309 – FCC – News and other information about the Federal Communications Commission is available at www.fcc.gov. 3 STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS RE: Section 68.4(a) of the Commission’s Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones; Cingular Wireless LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3)(i)(A) of the Commission’s Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order (WT Docket No. 01-309). Today’s Order grants Cingular Wireless a limited waiver of our hearing aid compatibility rules as they apply to wireless phones. It is with some hesitation that I support this action. I have said before that strong and clear rules are critical to accomplishing the statutory goal of ensuring that our Nation’s telecommunication networks are accessible to Americans with hearing loss. Nonetheless I understand that technological difficulties have emerged for wireless phones operating in the 850 MHz band. Advocates for the hearing loss community have expressed support for Cingular’s request—and I am satisfied that Cingular and other participants in the H…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 RH-74 External Pictures Photograph No 1 Photograph No 2 Exhibit 03: External Pictures FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 Photograph No 3 Photograph No 4 Exhibit 03: External Pictures FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 Photograph No 5 Exhibit 03: External Pictures FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia

CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 RH-74 Label and Location Exhibit 01: Label and Location FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia

CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 RH-74 Internal Pictures Photograph No 1 Exhibit 09: Internal Pictures FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 Photograph No 2 Exhibit 09: Internal Pictures FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 Photograph No 3 Exhibit 09: Internal Pictures FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia CONFIDENTIAL 19 September 2005 Photograph No 4 Exhibit 09: Internal Pictures FCC ID: QTLRH-74 / IC: 661AB-RH74 Applicant: Nokia Mobile Phones Copyright © 2005 Nokia

Nokia ____________________________________________________________________________ SAR Report Salo_SAR_0533_09 Applicant: Nokia Corporation Type: RH-74 Copyright” 2005 TCC Nokia 1/40 SAR Compliance Test Report Test report no.: Salo_SAR_0533_09 Date of report:2005-08-29 Template version: 4aNumber of pages: 40 Testing laboratory: TCC Salo P.O. Box 86 Joensuunkatu 7H / Kiila 1B FIN-24101 SALO, FINLAND Tel. +358 (0) 7180 08000 Fax. +358 (0) 7180 45220 Client: Nokia/China Nokia Tower, Pacific Century Place 2-A, Gong Ti Bei Lu Chaoyang District 100027 BEIJING, PRC Tel. +8610-65392828 Fax +8610-65393838 Responsible test engineer: Virpi Tuominen Product contact person: Shi Hailun Measurements made by: Janne Hirsimäki, Virpi Tuominen Tested device: RH-74 FCC ID: QTLRH-74 IC: 661AB-RH74 Supplement reports: - Testing has been carried out in accordance with: 47CFR §2.1093 Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure Evaluation: Portable Devices FCC OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 97-01), Supplement C (Edition 01-01) Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields RSS-102 Evaluation Procedure for Mobile and Portable Radio Transmitters with Respect to Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 for Exposure of Humans to Radio Frequency Fields IEEE 1528 - 2003 IEEE Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques Documentation: The documentation of the testing performed on the tested devices is archived for 15 years at TCC Nokia. Test results: The tested device complies with the requirements in respect of all parameters subject to the test. The test results and statements relate only to the items tested. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. Date and signatures: For the contents: Virpi Tuominen Senior Design Engineer Digitally signed by Virpi Tuominen DN: CN = Virpi Tuominen, C = FI, O = Nokia, OU = CertT Date: 2005.08.31 13:45:13 +03'00' Nokia ____________________________________________________________________________ SAR Report Salo_SAR_0533_09 Applicant: Nokia Corporation Type: RH-74 Copyright” 2005 TCC Nokia 2/40 CONTENTS 1.SUMMARY OF SAR TEST REPORT.............................................................................................................................................3 1.1T ESTDETAILS.............................................................................................................................................................................3 1.2M AXIMUMRESULTS....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.2.1Head Configuration........................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2.2Body Worn Configuration ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2.3Maximum Drift ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2.4Measurement Uncertainty ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2.DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE UNDER TEST.................................................. .........................................................................4 2.1P ICTURE OF THE DEVICE..............................................................................................................................................................4 2.2D ESCRIPTION OF THE ANTENNA..................................................................................................................................................5 3.TEST CONDITIONS.................................................................................. ...................................................................................5 3.1T EMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY....................................................................................................................................................5 3.2T ESTSIGNAL, FREQUENCIES AND OUTPUT POWER......................................................................................................................5 4.DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST EQUIPMENT................................................................. ..............................................................5 4.1M EASUREMENT SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS................................................................................................................................5 4.1.1Isotropic E-field Probe serial number ....................................................................................................................... 6 4.2P HANTOMS......................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.