QWP58500Wireless Ethernet Bridge

PTP 500 Series User Guide phn-1115-000v001 2 MOTOROLA, Inc. Point-to-Point Wireless Bridges – PTP 500 Series Software Release PTP 500-01-xx System User Manual March 7 th , 2008 Ref: PHN-1115-00.01 Copyright Information This document is the confidential property of Motorola, Inc. and without its prior written consent may not be copied or released to third parties. MOTOROLA, the stylized M Logo and all other trademarks indicated as such herein are trade- marks of Motorola, Inc.
Reg. U.S. Pat & Tm. Office. PTP 500 is a trademark of Motorola, Inc. All other product or service names are the property of their respective owners. C
2008 Motorola, Inc. All rights reserved. http://www.motorola.com/ptp Compliance General Changes or modifications not expressly approved by Motorola could void the user’s authority to operate the system. NOTE:This system has achieved Type Approval in various countries around the world. This means that the system has been tested against various local technical regulations and found to comply. The frequency bands in which the system operates is may be ‘unlicensed’ and, in these bands, the system can be used provided it does not cause interference. Further, it is not guaranteed protection against interference from other products and installations. 3 The system has been tested for compliance to both US (FCC) and European (ETSI) specifications. It has been shown to comply with the limits for emitted spurious radiation for a Class B digital device 1 , pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules in the USA and appropriate European ENs. These limits have been designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference. However the equipment can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to other radio communications. There is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: •Reorient or relocate the Outdoor Unit (ODU). •Increase the separation between the affected equipment and ODU. •Connect the ODU/PIDU into a power outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. •Consult your installer or supplier for help. Deployment and Operation The Radio Regulations of various countries’ limits constrain the operation of radio products gen- erally. In particular the local regulator may limit the amount of conducted or radiated transmitter power and may require registration of the radio link. The power transmitted by the PTP 500 Series Bridge is controlled by the use of Region-specific License Keys. The following examples show how the regulatory limits apply in some specific countries at the current time. Operators should note that regulations are subject to change. Contact your supplier/installer to ensure that your product is set for the correct License Key for your Country/Region and to ensure that you have fulfilled all the local regulatory requirements, especially if you are intending to use a link with external antennas. Notes below the tables indicate countries where registration of the link is currently mandatory. The system has been tested for compliance to both US (FCC) and European (ETSI) specifications. It has been shown to comply with the limits for emitted spurious radiation for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules in the USA and appropriate European ENs. These limits have been designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference. However the equipment can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to other radio communications. There is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. Class B Digital Device, A digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use 1 in commercial, business and industrial environments. 4 Regulations applicable to 5.4GHz PTP 500 Series Bridge variant Examples of Regulatory Limits at 5.4GHz FCCUnder FCC Regulations, operation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 12 (30dBm or 1W EIRP with Radar Detection) ETSIUnder ETSI Regulations, operation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 24 (30dBm or 1W EIRP with Radar Detection) Australia, CanadaUnder Australian Communications Authorities and Industry Canada Regulations, operation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 13 (30dBm or 1W EIRP with Radar Detection and barring of the band 5600-5650MHz) ThailandOperation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 20 (30 dBm or 1W EIRP) KoreaOperation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 21 (28 dBm EIRP (15 MHz)) General Notice Applicable to Europe This equipment complies with the essential requirements for the EU R&E Directive 1999/5/EC. Note:In regions other than EU/USA, specific local regulations may apply. It is the responsibility of the installer/user to check that the equipment as deployed meets local regulatory requirements. 5 Regulations applicable to 5.8GHz PTP 500 Series Bridge variant Examples of Regulatory Limits at 5.8GHz USA / Canada / Taiwan / BrazilEquipment can be operated in any mode, best results will be obtained using Region 1 settings ChinaOperation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 2 (33 dBm or 2W EIRP) AustraliaOperation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 3 (36 dBm or 4W EIRP) Hong KongUnder Hong Kong Regulations, operation of this product is only allowed with a License Key for Region 3 (36 dBm or 4W EIRP) UKUnder UK Regulations, operation of this product is allowed with a License Key for Region…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

orthogon*sgstems [inhay Business Park Eastern Road Ashburton Devon I013 7UP lJnited |(ingdom Iel: +44 (0)1364 655500 Fax: +44 (0)1364 654625 tlt{tl.orlhogonsysterns.coIn Secretary Federal Communications Commissi on 445I2th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Attention: Office of Engineering and Technology RE: ACQIIISITION OF ORTHOGON SYSTEMS AND PIPINGHOT NETWORKS BY MOTOROLA, INC Notification of Transfer of Control per FCC Part2.929(d) Dated: July 6 2006 PipingHot Networks, Ltd. produced Point to Point Wireless Ethernet Bridges operating in the 5.8GHz band. These products were marketed and sold under the Orthogon Systems, Ltd. brand, this being the Trading Name of PipingHot Networks, Ltd. The Grantee Code is QWP and the actual products were approved under FCC Part15.247. On 8th May 2006, Motorola, Inc. purchased the share capital of PipingHot Networks, Ltd. such that PipingHot Networks, Ltd. has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Motorola Inc. Motorola Inc intends to continue to market the products in the USA and would advise that a) the products will remain unchanged from a design and construction perspective and the product labelling remains unchanged b) the products will continue to be supported by the original design team in PipingHot Networks, Ltd. which will continue to be located at the site listed in the FCC records c) all contact details (names, addresses, contact telephone/fax numbers, etc) are unchanged d) there will be no change of manufacturing site for the equipments Pipingl|ot }{etworks Limited - Registration t|0.3848999 (Irading as 0lth0g0n Sptem$ Registeted in England legistered 0ffice: UrtitAl, Linhay Eusiness Park, fastern Road,Ashburtott,OevotlIQ13 iUP |ltlited |(ingdotn The equipment authorizations subject to this notification were gfanted under the following FCC I.D. numbers: QWP5sXX QWP58XX-T QWPsSXX-S /) QwPs8Loo g? -reb4 Clem Fisher RF DeveloPment Manager MotorolanixeaWirelessPointtoPointSolutionsGroup

Chris Harvey From: Claire Hoque [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:06 PM To: Chris Harvey; Chris Harvey -TCB Cc: Tina Chu; Neena Jain; Christine Vu Subject: answer for 08U11581 TCB/IC questions: Orthogon Systems Ltd., FCC ID: QWP58500, Assessment NO.: AN08T7797, IC: 109AO-58500 AN08I2388, Notice#1 Attachments: Setup photos.pdf; FCC Label Location.doc; Internal Photos(revised).pdf; Motorola Agency Letter.pdf; Notification of Motorola Acquistion to FCC.pdf; Theory of Operation(revised).pdf 4/8/2008 Hi Chris, Here are the answers. Thanks, Claire Hoque Compliance Certification Services 47173 Benicia Street Fremont, CA 94538, USA Tel: (510) 771-1123 Fax: (510) 661-0888 For FCC application, pls address: 1. The internal photographs show 4 different positions of the same side of the main board. Please submit additional photographs of the other side of the PCB as well as the general construction and the internal antenna. <answer> revised internal photos are attached . The antenna is a industry std model MA- WS57-30R maunfactured by MARS as listed in support equipment. note - we have no internal veiws of this antenna. 2. The Grantee Code QPW is listed on the FCC database for Orthogon Systems, Ltd. The confidentiality, authorization and professional installation letters are all on Motorola letterhead, although the address on the letters matches the address on file for grantee code QPW. The company name in the application must match the company name in the FCC database or be supplied by an authorized agent. Please correct this discrepancy. <answer> pls see two cover letters attached. 3. Please provide a label location exhibit. <answer> attached. 4. The RF test report documents the combined Peak Conducted Power as 26.6dBm, however the Theory of Operation indicates that each of the 2 H & V RF ports has a maximum of 27dBm. Please correct this discrepancy. <answer> I do not see any discrepancy. The Theory of Operation in Para 3.1.5.1 summarises that, the closed loop power control system is designed to ensure that each transmitter individually does not exceed a mean power level of 27dBm. IE max 30dBm conducted total power all ports, as permitted. The test report shows that in practise 26.6 dBm max (total both ports) was recorded. Where is your problem with this? However I clarified the wording of this para. to read 30dBm (all ports). 5. The RF test report documents Radiated Emissions with configurations using the external 6 foot dish antenna and the MA-WS57-30R integral antennas. The Antenna Specification exhibit lists 57 different antennas from 7 different manufacturers that can be used with this device. FCC 15.204 requires that antenna types (as defined by the FCC) to be used with an intentional radiator be approved with it. FCC 15.247 requires that emissions that fall into the restricted bands of 15.205 (not specifically addressed in the report) be measured according to the radiated emissions requirements of 15.209. There seem to be several antenna types, yet only 2 antennas were used for the Radiated Emissions measurements. Please explain how this device as marketed will comply with FCC 15.203, 15.204 and 15.205. <answer> As in previous submissions, we opted to do the testing with "worst case samples" both types of antenna - flat plat and dish. For the dish, we choose the one with the largest gain, as that will generate the highest radiated emission PSDs. Is this not a reasoanble appraach? 15.204 c(4) states (4) Any antenna that is of the same type and of equal or less directional gain as an antenna that is authorized with the intentional radiator may be marketed with, and used with, that intentional radiator......ff Spurious Emissions in restricted bands. No spurious emissions were found over the freq range covered. See pp 49 - 50 of teh report RFI state - If there are no emissions listed in the report within the restricted bands, it will be because the emissions were either better than 20dB below the emissions limit or there were none to report. 6. The RF report indicates that there is a 3.3 dB correction factor used in the Peak Output Power measurements to account for attenuation, cable and Duty Cycle Correction, but the duty cycle is not defined or explained in the report. Please define and explain the Duty Cycle Correction Factor used in these measurements. <answer> This comment in 5.8GHz radio test report RFI/RPTE3/RP49755JD06A is on page 66 Section 9.7: Peak Output Power. The 3.3dB applies to the duty factor correction facor only, the RF attenuator and cable loses were accounted separetly. The transmit TDD burst is 1.3msec and the period 2.8msec. Therefore the duty cycle correction factor applied is -3.3dB. I trust this explanation will be adequate without modyfying the report? 7. Please provide the test setup photos exhibit. <answer> attached. For Industry Canada application, also address: 1. Please provide a corrected Appendix II test report cover sheet to include all 4 model numbers described in the application and use the 99% occupied bandwidth measurement. Also, please note that the receiver spurious emissions are measured. <answer> We have stated already that the test house do not want to include the PTPxx300 series model numbers on their report or the cover sheets. We have asked by formal letter declaration for CCS to make this read across. We understood from previous coments that you agreed so to do. I do not understand your comment about the 99% bandwidth measurement - please explain on the telephone .As far as I see IC RSS210 part 8.4 para 5 permits 4W EIRP or greater using directional ant . No ref to 99% BW is made here. Receiver spurious canot be measured as there is no discete receive only mode. During the receive portion of the TDD cycle the transmitter circuitry is still 4/8/2008 active. This we feel is an accepted proceedure, all our previous products have been treated in the same way. see para 5.2 of report 4/8/2008

1 Chris Harvey From: Sharman John-RBVT46 [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:59 AM To: Chris Harvey Cc: Tina Chu; Neena Jain; Claire Hoque; FISHER CLEM-CFI002; Christine Vu Subject: RE: 08U11581 additional questions: Orthogon Systems Ltd., FCC ID: QWP58500, Assessment NO.: AN08T7797,IC: 109AO-58500 AN08I2388, Notice#2 Attachments: 5.8G FCC-RP49755JD06A (2).pdf 5.8G RP49755JD06A (2).p Hi Chris (Harvey) I trust that the following will resolve outstanding questions. Sorry I missed you on the phone last night, I had left the office. I will call you today. I hear you are East coast, 5 hours from UK? Therefore I will call you at 9am your time. Failing that, please call my office phone as below. Q4: The 3.3 dB TDD Tx correction factor is NOT the reason the Tx power was measured at 3.4dB below the 30dBm maximum permitted power. This is coincidence. Note: the actual device power is not stated as 30dBm in the Theory of Operation document( see extract below), only that the 'regulations' permit 30dBm and that as we have implemented two independent Tx chains, each chain Tx power is controlled to be not greater that 27dBm. In practise, the design output power was controlled (by software) to be less than this maximum legal limit. The 3.4dB is merely the margin we have between actual output v. the FCC regulatory limit. Please be aware that for the powers recorded in section "7.2.5 Tx Max Peak Output Power" of the test report RFI/RPTE3/RP49755JD06A dated 4 Apr 08, the correction factor was applied to the recorded results (together with cable and attenuator losses) to get the peak power stated during the Tx burst. This is the correct measurement procedure as I understand. Para 3.1.5.1 of our document "phn 1142: Th of Opn." states - The FCC/IC regulations limit the peak transmit power into the antenna (all ports) to 30dBm maximum. The PTP58500/PTP58300 operate with a pair of transmitters where each is connected to only a single port of the dual polarised antenna. Therefore, the closed loop power control system is designed to ensure that each transmitter individually does not exceed a mean power level of 27dBm. Q5: Section 2.4 of the test report states that the Integrated Ant. versions of the products use the MARS antenna. This is not listed on the Ant spec. sheet as this is a list of external fit ant. options. All the ext. fit antennas are dish types, we do not list or recommend an ext. panel antenna. Section 5.2 of the report (page 10) states the final radiated measurements were made with both panel and dish (6 foot) ant. types. This dish is listed in section 2.4. and in the antennas list as having 37.6dBi gain. Q6: The transmitter was operated with a TDD Tx burst duration 1.3msec and total TDD frame period 2.8msec. Therefore the non Tx portion of the TDD interval was approx 1.5 msec. This 2 comprises of 1.3msec to receive data from the link far-end terminal plus various overheads such as the TDD range interval. Your use of the word "continuous" is therefore to me capable of misinterpretation because the Tx is a burst within the TDD frame interval but yes continuous in the sense that it is always there in every TDD frame period! The 3.3dB is not related to the power as explained in response to Q4. IC comments: Please find the 99% BW results on page 20 on the RFI report. Do you have the latest version ...RPTE3....? A copy is attached. The point made by the test house RFI, is that as far as they were aware at that time they tested PTP58500 versions of the products as stated by the two model numbers referenced on their report. As such the Attestation as contained in the Appendix II Test Report Cover sheet, that they signed, can only refer to these two models numbers. Please note that the Annex I form signed by my boss Clem Fisher does contain all four model numbers. As we have discussed previously with Christine Vu and Michael Heckrotte we understand that CCS, as part of your Notified Body status, can attest that the two other model numbers can be included in the IC submission according to the declaration Motorola has made in the letter provided to you. OK? This seems to be the case for the 5.4GHz version product submission to IC. Is this being handled by a different person? Regards John Sharman RF Regulatory Engineering Motorola Point to Point Fixed Wireless Solutions Group email: [email protected] tel: +44 (0)1364 655577 -----Original Message----- From: Christine Vu [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 08 April 2008 20:34 To: Sharman John-RBVT46 Cc: Chris Harvey; Tina Chu; Neena Jain; Claire Hoque; FISHER CLEM-CFI002 Subject: RE: 08U11581 additional questions: Orthogon Systems Ltd., FCC ID: QWP58500, Assessment NO.: AN08T7797,IC: 109AO-58500 AN08I2388, Notice#2 Importance: High Hi John: The reviewer have had the opportunity to review the response to Notice #1 and have the following comments and items for further clarification: He has accepted the responses to questions 1, 2, 3, and 7 without additional comment. However, pls see below of his additional comments to Q4, Q5, & Q6 for FCC. Also, there is still additional comments for IC as well. Pls see below and reply to all ASAP. Thanks, CK FCC ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Question #4, although the response does not indicate so, the 3.4dB difference between the measured 26.6dBm combined power and the stated 30dBm power in the theory of operation is likely due to the Duty Cycle Correction factor of 3.3dB. Please confirm that this assumption is correct (see #6 below). Question #5, You now have indicated that there are only 2 antenna type (per the FCC's definition) which are Panel and Dish (parabolic). The test report indicates that panel antenna MARS MA-WS57-30R was used for Radiated measurement. This antenna is not listed on the antenna 3 specification sheet. What are the antenna specifications for the antenna used during the Radiated Emissions testing? Is this the highest gain panel antenna being approved with this device? Question…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Chris Harvey From: Chris Harvey [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:15 PM To: '[email protected]' Cc: 'Claire Hoque'; 'Christine Vu'; '[email protected]'; 'Mike Kuo' Subject: Assistance needed to Correct Typos for FCC ID: QPW58500 Attachments: RP49755JD06A Receive On 5-13-08.pdf 5/28/2008 Dear FCC, I was involved in the review and TCB Granting of FCC ID: QPW58500 on April 10, 2008. The test report submitted in the application had inadvertently included typos in the test equipment used and the measurement method for the RF Power Measurement which led to the grant listing of the incorrect power level. This error was discovered after the grant was issued, at which time CCS-TCB requested a Post-Grant sample of the EUT for confirmation of the measurement. The Test Lab has re-issued the test report with corrections to clarify the output power test method description. It is our understanding that there are no changes to any of the reported measurements. The revised test report is attached. We will like to upload revised documents for this filing and re-issue the Grant to list the correct 0.457W output power. Please place this filing into audit mode so we can make this change to correct the typos and revise the power based on that typo. Best regards, Chris Harvey

PTP 58500 ODU CAUTION:This product must be installed in accordance with the instructions in the User Manual Complies with UL60950 CSA C22.2 No. 60950 LISTING No: E112443 Label Part Number # 2949 not printed Made in: Germany Power Requirements: 55V 1.2A Model No: WB2855 IC:109AO-58500 FCC ID: QWP58500 1321 This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 1 This device may not cause harmful interference, and 2 This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. !

PTP 58500 ODU CAUTION:This product must be installed in accordance with the instructions in the User Manual Complies with UL60950 CSA C22.2 No. 60950 LISTING No: E112443 Label Part Number # 2950 not printed Made in: Germany Power Requirements: 55V 1.2A Model No: WB2856 IC:109AO-58500 FCC ID: QWP58500 1321 This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 1 This device may not cause harmful interference, and 2 This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. !

PTP 58300 ODU CAUTION:This product must be installed in accordance with the instructions in the User Manual Complies with UL60950 CSA C22.2 No. 60950 LISTING No: E112443 Label Part Number # 3192 not printed Made in: Germany Power Requirements: 55V 1.2A Model No: WB3163 IC:109AO-58500 FCC ID: QWP58500 1321 This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 1 This device may not cause harmful interference, and 2 This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. !

PTP 58300 ODU CAUTION:This product must be installed in accordance with the instructions in the User Manual Complies with UL60950 CSA C22.2 No. 60950 LISTING No: E112443 Label Part Number # 3193 not printed Made in: Germany Power Requirements: 55V 1.2A Model No: WB3164 IC:109AO-58500 FCC ID: QWP58500 1321 This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 1 This device may not cause harmful interference, and 2 This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. !

FCC Label Location

MOTOROLA IN CONFIDENCE phn_1142 000V003 08/04/2008 Page 6 of 11 SECTION 3: Photographs Figure 1: PTP 5xx00 terminal showing all interface connectors. Figure 2: PTP5xx00 with cover plate and screening cans removed to show internal assembly. MOTOROLA IN CONFIDENCE phn_1142 000V003 08/04/2008 Page 7 of 11 Figure 3: PTP5xx00 with cover plate and screening cans removed to show internal assembly. Figure 4: PTP5xx00 with cover plate and screening cans removed to show internal assembly MOTOROLA IN CONFIDENCE phn_1142 000V003 08/04/2008 Page 8 of 11 Figure 5: PTP5xx00 with cover plate and screening cans removed to show internal assembly Figure 6: Rear of printed circuit board as used in all models. MOTOROLA IN CONFIDENCE phn_1142 000V003 08/04/2008 Page 9 of 11 Figure 7: Connectorised version with front antenna connector plate removed. Figure 8: General assembly of connectorised version with circuit broad and front antenna connector plate removed. MOTOROLA IN CONFIDENCE phn_1142 000V003 08/04/2008 Page 10 of 11 Figure 9: Rear view of radio with MARS integrated antenna fitted and showing position of model label. Figure 10: MARS Inc Antenna rear view, showing flying lead interconnects to radio. MOTOROLA IN CONFIDENCE phn_1142 000V003 08/04/2008 Page 11 of 11 Figure 11: Front view of Integrated antenna version with antenna disconnected. Figure 12: MARS Inc Antenna used for both 5.4 and 5.8GHz Integrated antenna versions, front view of radome.

רח 'המנור 3 חולון 58861 3 Hamanor St. Holon 58861 Israel טל ' :5599661- 03 Tel: 03-5599661 פקס :5599677- 03 Fax: 03-5599677 [email protected] www.mars-antennas.com SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANTENNA MA-WS56-3OR Specifications: Electrical Frequency Band 5.47 – 5.875 GHz Gain 23dBi nom Polarization Dual: Vertical & Horizontal 3 dB Beam Width (H/E-Plane), typical. 7-9 ̊ Side Lobes Performance ETSI TS3 Front to Back ratio , (min) 35 dB Cross Polarization 15 dB Impedance 50 Ohms VSWR, (max.) 1.5 : 1 Power Handling (max) 5 W DC Grounding The antenna structure shall provide a dc path to ground for each polarisation to prevent both static build up and high currents in the connectors in the event of a nearby lightning strike Squint The antenna pattern shall not squint with frequency, ie the antenna must not comprise end-fed arrays. Mechanical and Environmental Dimensions 370x370x40 mm Mounting Bracket None Mechanical Interface The Antenna shall mate with the Orthogon Systems Gemini and Spectra Radio equipment. The lower edge of the antenna shall fit flush with the edge of the casting and shall be centrally located in the horizontal plane . . Connector 2 X SMA Right Angle, Radome Plastic, UV protected Back Plate Aluminum (with protective coating on all exposed surfaces to prevent corrosion in a global outdoor deployment scenario) Product labelling According to figures 3 and 4 Weight <2.5 Kg Vibration & Shock IEC 60721-3-4 רח 'המנור 3 חולון 58861 3 Hamanor St. Holon 58861 Israel טל ' :5599661- 03 Tel: 03-5599661 פקס :5599677- 03 Fax: 03-5599677 [email protected] www.mars-antennas.com Temperature (operating/storage) -40°C to +70°C Water tightness IP67 Wind Loading Operational at ≤ 160 kph Survival at ≤ 220 kph Ice Loading Gain reduction < 3dB with 10 mm ice on whole of antenna surface Gain reduction < 6dB with 20 mm ice on whole of antenna surface No damage with 25 mm ice build up. APPROVED BY QA MARS 11/02/07 APPROVED BY GM MARS 11/02/07

Professionally installed external antennas permitted for use with the Motorola PTP58500/PTP58300 and PTP 54500/PTP54300 Point to Point radios. Antenna Choice (FCC and Industry Canada Regions Only) For FCC and Industry Canada, the PTP500 Series Bridge has been designed to operate with the antennas listed 1 and 2, and having a maximum gain of 37.7 dB (34.9 dB for 5.4 GHz product variant). Antennas not included in these tables or having a gain greater than 37.7 dB (34.9 dB for 5.4 GHz product variant) are strictly prohibited for use with this device. The required antenna impedance is 50 ohms. Cable Losses The approval for the product to not exceed the EIRP limit is based on a radio ODU to antenna cable loss of not less than 1.2dB. Antennas for USA / Canada – 5.8 GHz Manufacturer Antenna Type Gain (dBi) Flat Plate Parabolic Dish Andrew Andrew 2-foot Parabolic, P2F-52 (29.4dBi) 29.4 Y Andrew Andrew 2-foot Dual-Pol Parabolic, PX2F-52 (29.4dBi) 29.4 Y Andrew Andrew 3-foot Parabolic, P3F-52 (33.4dBi) 33.4 Y Andrew Andrew 3-foot Dual-Pol Parabolic, PX3F-52 (33.4dBi) 33.4 Y Andrew Andrew 4-foot Parabolic, P4F-52 (34.9dBi) 34.9 Y Andrew Andrew 4-foot Dual-Pol Parabolic, PX4F-52 (34.9dBi) 34.9 Y Andrew Andrew 6-foot Parabolic, P6F-52 (37.6dBi) 37.6 Y Andrew Andrew 6-foot Dual-Pol Parabolic, PX6F-52 (37.6dBi) 37.6 Y Gabriel Gabriel 2-foot High Performance QuickFire Parabolic, HQF2-52-N 28.2 Y Gabriel Gabriel 4-foot High Performance QuickFire Parabolic, HQF4-52-N 34.4 Y Gabriel Gabriel 6-foot High Performance QuickFire Parabolic, HQF6-52-N 37.4 Y Gabriel Gabriel 2-foot High Performance Dual QuickFire Parabolic, HQFD2-52-N 28.1 Y Gabriel Gabriel 4-foot High Performance Dual QuickFire Parabolic, HQFD4-52-N 34.3 Y Gabriel Gabriel 6-foot High Performance Dual QuickFire Parabolic, HQFD6-52-N 37.3 Y Gabriel Gabriel 2-foot Standard QuickFire Parabolic, QF2-52-N 28.5 Y Gabriel Gabriel 2-foot Standard QuickFire Parabolic, QF2-52-N-RK 28.5 Y Manufacturer Antenna Type Gain (dBi) Flat Plate Parabolic Dish Gabriel Gabriel 2.5-foot Standard QuickFire Parabolic, QF2.5-52-N 31.2 Y Gabriel Gabriel 4-foot Standard QuickFire Parabolic, QF4-52-N 34.8 Y Gabriel Gabriel 4-foot Standard QuickFire Parabolic, QF4-52-N-RK 34.8 Y Gabriel Gabriel 6-foot Standard QuickFire Parabolic, QF6-52-N 37.7 Y Gabriel Gabriel 2-foot Standard Dual QuickFire Parabolic, QFD2-52-N 28.4 Y Gabriel Gabriel 2.5-foot Standard Dual QuickFire Parabolic, QFD2.5-52-N 31.1 Y Gabriel Gabriel 2-foot Standard Dual QuickFire Parabolic, QFD2-52-N-RK 28.4 Y Gabriel Gabriel 4-foot Standard Dual QuickFire Parabolic, QFD4-52-N 34.7 Y Gabriel Gabriel 4-foot Standard Dual QuickFire Parabolic, QFD4-52-N-RK 34.7 Y Gabriel Gabriel 6-foot Standard Dual QuickFire Parabolic, QFD6-52-N 37.7 Y RadioWaves Radio Waves 2-foot Dual-Pol Parabolic, SPD2-5.2 (28.1dBi) 28.1 Y RadioWaves Radio Waves 2-foot Parabolic, SP2-5.2 (29.0dBi) 29 Y RadioWaves Radio Waves 3-foot Dual-Pol Parabolic, SPD3-5.2 (31.1dBi) 31.1 Y RadioWaves Radio Waves 3-foot Parabolic, SP3-5.2 (31.4dBi) 31.4…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.