RFK-CBAHPNEXMulti Channel Power Amplifier

Nextel In-Building Amplifier Installation Manual Page 1 of 4 All brands and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright 2003, Janizary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. 11/16/05 Rev B D000001 Designed and manufactured under license from Motorola, Inc. in the USA Note: Before installing the Cyfre™ Amplifier, please read the entire contents of this manual. Section # 1 Parts List Ite m Q ty Description 1 1 Cyfre ™ Amplifier 2 1 Cyfre external antenna 3 4 5 1 1 1 Cyfre interior antenna with 4 meters of low loss antenna cable Cyfre 120 VAC power supply Cyfre 4 meter low loss antenna cable with “N” connectors Section # 2 Tools and Other Materials Required Item Description 1 Electric drill (as required for amplifier mounting holes, and external antenna mounting) 2 Chisel and Phillips Screw drivers, 8mm and 10mm wrenches 3 Qty 8 fasteners (length and type as required for amplifier and external antenna mounting) 4 Wire cutters / strippers 5 Cables ties for clamping the external and interior antenna cables to rigid structure Section # 3 WARNINGS! ∇ Antennas must be mounted a minimum distance of 50 cm (1.64ft) away from any person, and 4 meters (13.12 ft)away from each other. ∇ When selecting a location for the interior antenna a minimum distance of 6 feet (1.82m) distance away from the amplifier. ∇ When 2 or more antennas are located in the same area they must be mounted at different heights to insure optimum performance. ∇ Exterior antennas can only be installed outdoors. Under no circumstances can an exterior antenna be installed indoors, Doing so will result in amplifier failure and void the warranty. ∇ The power supply must be plugged into a 120 VAC electrical outlet that is connected to a circuit breaker of a minimum of 1 ampere. ∇ Under no circumstances should the amplifier be powered up without a properly connected 50 ohm 800 MHz cellular or SMR band antenna connected to both the internal and external connections or the amplifier may be damaged, resulting in the manufacturer’ warranty being voided. ∇ For optimum performance and compatibility with cellular service provider requirements, it is recommended that the external antenna be installed above the roofline of a building with a clear view of the surrounding area ∇ Use of cellular amplifiers with antennas of higher gains than 12 dBi gain is in violation of FCC regulations for which the offender will be fully liable, and warranty claims will be voided. ∇ Do not extend the external antenna cable with another coaxial cable. The additional loss of the cable length and connectors will greatly diminish the performance of the amplifier. It is recommended that only qualified or informed installation technicians install this product in a building. Installation by any other person is at the risk of the owner and operator. Nextel In-Building Amplifier Installation Manual Page 2 of 4 All brands and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright 2003, Janizary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. 11/16/05 Rev B D000001 Designed and manufactured under license from Motorola, Inc. in the USA Section # 4 Installation Cautions ∇ Use caution to avoid drilling through or near electrical, water or gas lines. ∇ Do not mount the signal amplifier or its associated wiring in a location that may contain hazardous materials or materials that are corrosive. ∇ Do not attempt to ground the external antenna. It is designed with its own interior ground system. ∇ The interior antenna requires a ground plane. It should be mounted on any type of metal that will have a minimum of one square foot of surface area under the antenna base. ∇ Caution: DO NOT INSTALL THE INTERIOR ANTENNA IN A HAZARDOUS LOCATION THAT MAY CONTAIN ANY TYPE OF VOLITILE VAPORS. Section # 5 Selecting a Suitable Location To Install The Amplifier ∇ Locate a suitable place to mount the cellular band amplifier. For exterior antennas you must mount the antenna above the roofline of the building at a distance that can be reached from the supplied external antenna cable, on a shelf near a electrical power source, in a dry area that is well ventilated. The amplifier’s location should be easily accessible and mounted away from moving parts, as well as excessive heat and moisture. ∇ Antennas must be mounted a minimum distance of 50 cm (1.64ft) away from any person, , and 4 meters (13.12 ft)away from each other. ∇ When selecting a location for the interior antenna a minimum distance of 6 feet (1.82m) distance away from the amplifier. ∇ When 2 or more antennas are located in the same area, they must be mounted at different heights to insure optimum performance. ∇ Exterior antennas can only be installed outdoors. Under no circumstances can an exterior antenna be installed indoors, Doing so will result in amplifier failure and void the warranty. ∇ If the signal level is increased in some areas but not others, it may be due to location of interior antenna or building materials acting as a shield for the radio signals. This can be overcome by re-positioning the interior antenna or, the use of 2 internal antennas in conjunction with a very low loss high quality splitter. Please note that the interior antennas must be at least twenty five (25) feet apart and should be separated by gypsum clad, masonry or metal constructed wall. Nextel In-Building Amplifier Installation Manual Page 3 of 4 All brands and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright 2003, Janizary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. 11/16/05 Rev B D000001 Designed and manufactured under license from Motorola, Inc. in the USA Typical Installation For the Cyfre™ In-Building Amplifier Series Section # 6 Installation Of The Cellular In-Building Amplifier 1. Unpack the box with the amplifier, power supply, external antenna, antenna cable and interior antenna. 2. The first item is to find a suitable location for the exterior antenna, which will give a clear view without obstruction, and also allow the…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 April 9, 2006 RE: FCC ID: RFKCBAHPNEX_ATCB003332 Attention: Leon Paul Kass I have a few comments on this Application. Please note that further comments may arise in response to answers provided to the questions below. 1. Please note that the 731 states this is a single channel amplifier. However, it also give a frequency range covering many channels. The test report also covers all channels in the 806-821MHz and 851-866MHz part 90 range. The antenna input also appears not to control the input signal to restrict use on only one channel. In other words, the device appears to amplify any number of signals present at the input antenna. Please explain. 2. Please note that as this is a Booster/Amplifier, power listed on the grant would be conducted power. The power listed on the 731 appears to be the ERP power using the 12dBi antenna. Please provide a 731 form using conducted power at the antenna terminal. 3. Please note that as this is a Booster/amplifier, power measurements must include both the input and output levels. Please provide information (i.e. plots) of the input signals for the power measurements performed. 4. Please note that the input to the amplifier during power tests must also show that the minimum input level specified by the manufacturer yields the stated output and that the maximum input specified by the manufacturer does not overdrive the amplifier. Please show these conditions. 5. Please note that ERP for part 90 devices is not a calculated value. ERP is required to be a measured value using the antenna substitution method. While the ERP for this device is not needed as mentioned in item 2 above, when reporting ERP you must use the accepted test procedures as specified in TIA603. Please correct the report to provide ERP as correctly measured using the antenna substitution method stated. 6. Please note that the intermodulation test data shows three signals at or around 13-17dBm and corresponding intermod products just under the limit of -13dBm. The power out of the device is listed as 25dBm (page 13 of the report). However, the test signal used for the intermod test shows a power level that is a full 10 dB lower than that shown for the amplifier. As the intermod products are fairly close to the limit as shown in the test data, please explain and verify that this test was done with the amplifier output at its highest and with the amplifier ‘working’ hardest. Otherwise, please retest with the amplifier input and out put adjusted for a maximum power available from the device. 7. Please note that while the explanation of ERP spurious emissions helps, the actual test data appears not to give sufficient data to determine how the procedure fits with the reported measured data. For example, the table only states “dBm read” (see pages 93-98 of the report). However, no information is given in the report to explain what this term means or how it was derived. Please provide an explanation of how this term is derived. Please provide a sample calculation to support proper antenna substitution methods (i.e. sig gen reading + ant – cable). 8. Please note that the MPE report states that the manual has a minimum 4meter separation distance requirement. Please note that section 3 and 5 of the manual only states a minimum of 50cm.. Please that that while the device is safe at 30cm per the rf exposure ixnibit, documentation needs to be consistent. Please correct either the manual or the report and MPE exhibit to show the same information. z Page 2 April 9, 2006 Dennis Ward mailto:[email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

ATCB26 Apr 2006 6731 Whittier Avenue McLean, VA 22101 RE: FCC ID: RFKCBAHPNEX_ATCB003332 Attention: Dennis Smith In response to your letter dated April 9, 2006. Responses are listed below after each question. 0.Overall all comment, the report submitted was identical in form to a previously submitted project through ATCB (reference on FCC authorization page RFJTG-806). During the painful process of this submittal it was recognized that amps and signal boosters do not have clear cut requirements and we had tried to come up with a standard package at that time. It would appear that we are still trying to hit a moving target. As the above project was handled through ATCB and was accepted by the FCC I would like to request some latitude in this process. As this is a learning curve I will strive to incorporate suggestions to improve the process on future submittals as much as is practicable. 1. Please note that the 731 states this is a single channel amplifier. However, it also give a frequency range covering many channels. The test report also covers all channels in the 806-821 MHz and 851-866MHz part 90 range. The antenna input also appears not to control the input signal to restrict use on only one channel. In other words, the device appears to amplify any number of signals present at the input antenna. Please explain. 1A.To be provided by submittor. 2. Please note that as this is a Booster/Amplifier, power listed on the grant would be conducted power. The power listed on the 731 appears to be the ERP power using the 12dBi antenna. Please provide a 731 form using conducted power at the antenna terminal. 2A.To be provided by submittor. Report has been corrected to reference Rated Conducted Power. 3. Please note that as this is a Booster/amplifier, power measurements must include both the input and output levels. Please provide information (i.e. plots) of the input signals for the power measurements performed. 3A.Actually, both input and output plots have been provided in the report. The input plots are provided in the occupied bandwidth section. The input levels were derived by using the maximum input available for each modulation type at the point where there was no more gain at the output. Therefore in accordance with FCC 2-11-04/EAB/RF the maximum power rating has been supplied for each modulation type and it has been verified to “Meet power limits of 90.219 for Part 90 booster operations”. The information in this section is identical to the information as provided in previously approved reports (RV48068-004 FCC ID RFJTG-806). 4. Please note that the input to the amplifier during power tests must also show that the minimum input level specified by the manufacturer yields the stated output and that the maximum input specified by the manufacturer does not overdrive the amplifier. Please show these conditions. 4A.Is this a new requirement? I can not find this requirement listed under Part 90.219 or in FCC 2-11-04/EAB/RF. Minimum input level to published gain data is a performance specification and not a regulatory specification that I can find in the FCC requirements. 5. Please note that ERP for part 90 devices is not a calculated value. ERP is required to be a measured value using the antenna substitution method. While the ERP for this device is not needed as mentioned in item 2 above, when reporting ERP you must use the accepted test procedures as specified in TIA603. Please correct the report to provide ERP as correctly measured using the antenna substitution method stated. 5A.References to ERP power have been removed from the Output Power section of the report. Radiated spurious ERP measurements were made using the substitution method however the data does not show the calculations used. The column dBm READ was the corrected values already calculated. The report has been corrected and a better explanation of test procedure and calculations have been provided to avoid confusion. 6. Please note that the intermodulation test data shows three signals at or around 13-17dBm and corresponding intermod products just under the limit of -13dBm. The power out of the device is listed as 25dBm (page 13 of the report). However, the test signal used for the intermod test shows a power level that is a full 10 dB lower than that shown for the amplifier. As the intermod products are fairly close to the limit as shown in the test data, please explain and verify that this test was done with the amplifier output at its highest and with the amplifier ‘working’ hardest. Otherwise, please retest with the amplifier input and out put adjusted for a maximum power available from the device. 6A.This device has a maximum power output which when multiple input signals are present reduces the available power per channel. The input levels used for the intermod test were three signals of the same input level for the power output tests. By using this power level the device reduces the gain on subsequent channels in the same band and produces intermod products. A brief description of the amplifier section has been attached as an additional document which clearly states the effect on the output stage of the amplifier and why during intermod tests the levels appear lower than other single channel tests. 7. Please note that while the explanation of ERP spurious emissions helps, the actual test data appears not to give sufficient data to determine how the procedure fits with the reported measured data. For example, the table only states “dBm read” (see pages 93-98 of the report). However, no information is given in the report to explain what this term means or how it was derived. Please provide an explanation of how this term is derived. Please provide a sample calculation to support proper antenna substitution methods (i.e. sig gen reading + ant – cable). 7A.Radiated spurious ERP measurements were made using the substitution method however the data does not show the calculations used. The column dBm READ was the corrected val…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

LEON PAUL KASS, LLC CONSULTANT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 9695 135 th Street Seminole, Florida 33776-1434 Phone 727-593-3100 Fax 727-593-7950 E Mail lpk @ fdn.com May 3, 2006 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Office of Engineering and Technology Equipment Authorization Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Re: PERMANENT CONFIDENTIALITY REQUEST FOR FCC ID:RFK-CBAHPNEX Model HP-NEX Dear Sir/ Madam: Pursuant to sections 0.457 and 0.459 of CFR 47, the applicant requests permanent confidential treatment of the following information accompanying this application. 1. Block Diagram 2. Parts List 3. Schematic drawing 4. Theory of operation 5. Tune up procedure 6. Saturation control circuit The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information in conjunction with a Manufacturing Agreement between Janizary Holdings, Inc., and Leon Paul Kass LLC that is in conjunction with a License to use specific patented technology from Motorola, Inc. in the development and production of this unit. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. Sincerely Leon Paul Kass Authorized Agent for Janizary Holdings, Inc.

FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 108 RF Exposure – MPE Calculations - Uplink Input Transmitter Power: 439 mW Antenna Gain: 12 dB Cable loss: 1.5 dB @ 806 – 869 MHz Frequency range: 806-869 MHz Assumptions 1. A single ¼ wavelength radiating antenna is assumed. 2. Closest exposure distance is assumed to be 50 cm FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 109 RF Exposure – MPE Calculations - Uplink Calculations The following results shall be assumed to be accurate for the far-field only. These predictions will over-estimate power density in the near–field. Based on the use of a ¼ wavelength radiator, a distance of 50 cm is considered to be in the far-field for all cases. For the purposes of these calculations a distance of 50cm was used. The actual distance as specified in the user manual is 50 centimeters. 50cm represents the worst case configuration assuming an incorrect installation. S = PG/4*PI*R 2 @ 806 – 869 MHz P is 439 mW G is 10.5 dB (Antenna gain – loss) or 10 (10.5/10) or 11.22 R is 50 cm S = 0.157 mW/cm 2 For Occupational/Controlled Exposure From 300 to 1500 MHz, power density limit is f/300 mW/cm 2 @ 806 MHz, power density limit is 2.687 mW/cm 2 for 6 minutes. For General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure From 300 to 1500 MHz, power density limit is f/1500 mW/cm 2 @ 806 MHz, Power density limit is 0.537 mW/cm 2 for 30 minutes. Conclusion: Meets MPE limits

FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 1 Application for Certification For an RF amplifier Janizary Holdings Inc. 5380 Sterling Center Drive Westlake Village, CA 91361 RF amplifier FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX REPORT # RV58130A-004 This report was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the FCC Rules and Regulations Part 2, Subpart J, 2.1031 through 2.1057, and Part 90 and in accordance with Industry Canada Radio Standards Specification RSS-131 for Zone Enhancers and any other applicable sections of the rules as indicated herein. Prepared By: DNB Engineering, Inc. 5969 Robinson Avenue Riverside, Ca 92503-8620 Industry Canada Lab Code: IC 4738 26 Jan 2006 FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 2 TEST LAB PERSONNEL Test Performed by: Date Signature Thomas Elders 06 Jun 2005 APPROVALS Management Approval Date Signature Les Payne Sr. Engineering Manager 06 Jun 2005 APPROVALS Revision reviewed Date Signature Les Payne Sr. Engineering Manager 26 Apr 2006 Original report RV58130A-001 Dated 06 Jun 2005 Revised report RV58130A-002 Dated 24 Jan 2006 Revised report RV58130A-003 Dated 26 Jan 2006 Revised report RV58130A-004 Dated 26 Apr 2006 FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Sheet # Test Lab Personnel and Approvals 2 Table of Contents 3 Table of Figures 4 1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 5 1.1 Certifications and Qualifications 5 1.2 Measurements and Repeatability Information 5 1.3 Test Methodology 6 1.4 Test Equipment 6 1.5 Deviations 6 1.6 Test Description 7 Note: Paragraph numbers in this report follow the application section numbers found in the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rules and Regulations, Part 2, Subpart J for Certification of electronic equipment. 2.1033 (C) (1) Application for Certification 8 2.1033 (C) (2) FCC Identifier 9 2.1033 (C) (3) Installation and Operating Instructions (Service manual) 9 2.1033 (C) (4) Type of Emissions 9 2.1033 (C) (5) Frequency Range 9 2.1033 (C) (6) Operating Power 9 2.1033 (C) (7) Maximum Power Allowed in Applicable part(s) of the Rules 9 2.1033 (C) (8) Final RF amplifier Input Power Characteristics 9 2.1033 (C) (9) Tune Up Procedure 9 2.1033 (C) (10) Schematic Diagram and Circuit Description 10 2.1033 (C) (11) Equipment Identification Plate 10 2.1033 (C) (12) Equipment Photographs (Internal) 10 2.1033 (C) (12) Equipment Photographs (External) 10 2.1033 (C) (13) Digital Modulation Techniques 10 2.1033 (C) (14) Test Data 10 Test Set-Up 11-12 2.1046 (RSS-131 cl4.3) Measurement of RF Power Output 13-25 2.1049 (RSS-131 cl4.4) Measurement of Occupied Bandwidth 25-54 2.1051 (RSS-131 cl4.5) Spurious Emissions at Antenna Terminals 55-91 2.1053 Measurement of Field Strength of Spurious Radiation 92-98 Conducted Emissions 99-101 Radiated Emissions 102-103 2.1055 (RSS-131 cl4.5) Measurement of Frequency Stability 104 2.1057 Frequency Spectrum to be Investigated 105 RF Exposure 106-107 Appendix A Photographs 108-112 FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 4 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1 : Test Equipment 6 Figure 2 : Test Result Summary 10 Figure 3 : Test Set Up Block Diagram 12 Figure 4 : Block Diagram Radiated Emissions 12 Figure 5 : Output Power Plots 14 Figure 6 : Occupied Bandwidth / Modulation Characteristic Plots 26 Figure 7 : Antenna Conducted Spurious Plots 57 Figure 8 : Radiated Spurious Tabular Data 93 Figure 9 : Unintentional Conducted Emissions 100 Figure 10 : Unintentional Radiated Emissions 103 Appendix A : Photos 108 FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 5 1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1.1 Certifications and Qualifications I certify that DNB Engineering, Inc conducted the tests performed in order to obtain the technical data presented in this application. Also, based on the results of the enclosed data, I have concluded that the equipment tested meets or exceeds the requirements of the Rules and Regulations governing this application. 1.2 Measurement Repeatability Information The test data presented in this report has been acquired using the guidelines set forth in FCC Part 2.1031 through 2.1057, and Part 90, also included in this report is compliancy data for Industry Canada RS-131 for Zone Enhancers. The test results presented in this document are valid only for the equipment identified herein under the test conditions described. Repeatability of these test results will only be achieved with identical measurement conditions. These conditions include: The same test distance, EUT Height, Measurement Site Characteristics, and the same EUT System Components. The system must have the same Interconnecting Cables arranged in identical placement to that in the test set-up, with the system and/or EUT functioning in the identical mode of operation (i.e. software and so on) as on the date of the test. Any deviation from the test conditions and the environment on the date of the test may result in measurement repeatability difficulties. All changes made to the EUT during the course of testing as identified in this test report must be incorporated into the EUT or identical models to ensure compliance with the FCC regulations. C. L. Payne III (Para. 1.1) Sr Engineering Manager DNB Engineering, Inc. Tel. (951) 637-2630 Fax (951) 637-2704 E-mail [email protected] FCC ID: RFK-CBAHPNEX 6 1.3 Test Methodology The tests were performed in accordance with FCC Part 2 Subpart J, 2.1031 through 2.1057, 15, and 90, Industry Canada RSS-131 on a sample of the production model. 1.4 Test Equipment FIGURE 1: TEST EQUIPMENT Description Manufacturer M/N S/N Cal Date Test Used On Signal Generator Agilent E4432B GB40051213 09/24/05 RF Power Out put, Emissions Lim, Cond Spur, Rad Spur, CE Signal Generator Marconi 2024 112231/034 02/02/05 RF Power Out put, Emissions Lim, Cond Spur, Rad Spur, CE Spectrum Analyzer Display H/P 85662A 259101-1 01/10/06 RF Power Out put, Emissions Lim, Cond Spur, Rad Spur, CE Spectrum Analyzer H/P 8566B 259101-2 01/10/06 RF Power Out put, Emissions Lim, Cond Spur, Rad Spur, CE Spec Analyzer Display H/P 85662A 2318A05282 8/14/05 RE Spectrum Analyzer H/P 85680B 2049A01403 6/2/05 RE Quasi-Peak Adapter H/P 85650A 2043A00184 6/2…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.