EHANOVCDPDMobile Computer with WAN CDPD radio

Intermec Technologies CorporationFCC ID: EHANOVCDPD EMC Test LabREPORT NO: 20010830-1 DOC. NO.: 577-500-993 Page 1 of 2 700 Novatel CDPD, SAR Portable, Appendix F, Declaration of Conformity Insert Technologies Corporation EMC Test Laboratory Cedar Rapids, IA MEASUREMENT/TECHNICAL REPORT Intermec Technologies Corporation 700 With Novatel CDPD Cellular Radio Module REPORT NO: 20010830-1 DATE: August 30, 2001 APPENDIX F DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY INSERT, USER INFORMATION Intermec Technologies CorporationFCC ID: EHANOVCDPD EMC Test LabREPORT NO: 20010830-1 DOC. NO.: 577-500-993 Page 2 of 2 700 Novatel CDPD, SAR Portable, Appendix F, Declaration of Conformity Insert Compliance Statement Insert Device Name: Hand-held ComputerModel Number: 700, 710, 720 The responsible party for the compliance of this device is:Intermec Technologies Corporation 6001 36 th Avenue West Everett, WA 98203 USA (425) 348-2600 CAUTION: See users guide instructions for handling, charging, and replacing batteries. Failure to follow those instructions can result in personal injury, fire, or battery explosion. This product conforms to the following approvals. The user(s) of this product are cautioned to use accessories and peripherals approved by Intermec Technologies Corporation. The use of accessories other than those recommended or changes to this product that are not approved by Intermec Technologies Corporation may expose hazards to the operator or nearby persons, void the compliance of this product and may result in the loss of the users authority to operate the equipment. 700 Novatel CDPD Radio Users FCC ID: EHANOVCDPD WARNING: per the FCC RF (radio frequency) exposure requirements, (1) Antennas must be supplied and installed as recommended by Intermec Technologies to ensure compliance to FCC RF exposure requirements. (2) This device has been tested for compliance with a separation distance of 11.2-mm (1/2 inch) from the terminal back to a person's body. The operating configurations of this device do not support transmitter operation while it is carried in pockets or holsters next to a person’s body. The user shall not touch the antenna while the transmitter is in use. Operation of the terminal while the unit is in the hand provides the 11.2-mm (1/2-inch) distance requirement for safe operation next to the body. (3) RF safety requirements mandate this device cannot be co-located with other transmitters. FCC Digital Emissions Compliance This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: • Reorient or relocate the radio of television receiving antenna. • Increase the separation between the computer equipment and receiver. • Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the radio or television receiver is connected. • Consult the dealer or an experienced radio television technician for help. Canadian Digital Apparatus Compliance This Class B digital apparatus meets all requirements of the Canadian Interference-Causing Equipment Regulations. Cet appareil numérique de la classe B respecte toutes les exigences du Règlement sur le matériel brouilleur du Canada. Telephone Installation Warning Notices The following notices apply to equipment that may be connected to telephone lines or systems. For your personal safety, and to protect this equipment from potential electrical or physical damage, do NOT connect equipment to telephone lines or data communication equipment unless the following warnings have been read, understood, and complied with. • Never install telephone wiring during a lightning storm. • Never install telephone jacks in wet locations unless the jack is specifically designed for wet locations. • Never touch uninsulated telephone wires or terminals unless the telephone line has been disconnected at the network interface. • Use caution when installing or modifying telephone lines. • Avoid using telephone (other than cordless type) during an electrical storm. There may be a remote risk of electric shock from lightning. • Do not use the telephone to report a gas leak in the vicinity of the leak. Installation do téléphone : avertissements Les avertissements qui suivent s'appliquent à tout équipement qui peut être branché aux lignes ou systemes téléphoniques. Pour votre sécurité personnelle et pour protéger l'équipement de tout dommage électrique ou physique potentiel, NE PAS brancher un ordinateur tablette électronique ou ses périphériques aux lignes téléphoniques ou équipements avant que les avertissements suivants aient été lus, compris et observés: • Ne jamais installer de câblage téléphonique pendant un orage électrique. • Ne jamais installer de prise téléphonique dans un endroit humide à moins que la prise ait été spécifiquement conçue pour être utilisée dans les endroits humides. • Ne jamais toucher les fils de téléphone ou de l'équipement terminal non isolés à moins que la ligne téléphonique n'ait été débranchée de l'interface réseau.

Intermec Technologies CorporationFCC ID: EHANOVCDPD EMC Test LabREPORT NO: 20020117-1 DOC. NO.: 577-501-008 Page 1 of 18 700 CDPD, FCC 2.1053 Radiated Spurious Emissions, Appendix A Technologies Corporation EMC Test Laboratory Cedar Rapids, IA MEASUREMENT/TECHNICAL REPORT Intermec Technologies Corporation 700 With Novatel CDPD Cellular Radio Module REPORT NO: 20020117-1 DATE: January 17, 2002 APPENDIX A NOVATEL USERS MANUAL NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Calgary, Alberta TITLE: Hardware Interface Specification for Expedite Wireless IP Modem DOCUMENT NO.: OM-01016529 SHEET: 1 of 17 REV: 3.0 EXPEDITE WIRELESS IP MODEM HARDWARE INTERFACE SPECIFICATION OM - 01016529 Revision 3 NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Calgary, Alberta TITLE: Hardware Interface Specification for Expedite Wireless IP Modem DOCUMENT NO.: OM-01016529 SHEET: 2 of 17 REV: 3.0 REVISION HISTORY REV# ECO# EFF. DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED APPROVED 1 99007 Initial release. P. Faubert S. Smilar 2 99024 990709 Change order of pins 21 and 22 P. Faubert S. Smilar 3 99047 990809 Add mounting instructions K. Frayn S. Smilar NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Calgary, Alberta TITLE: Hardware Interface Specification for Expedite Wireless IP Modem DOCUMENT NO.: OM-01016529 SHEET: 3 of 17 REV: 3.0 The information disclosed herein is the exclusive property of NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. and is not to be disclosed without the written consent of NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic storage, reproduction, execution or transmission without the prior written consent of NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. The recipient of this document by its retention and use, agrees to respect the security status of the information contained herein. The information disclosed herein is the exclusive property of Novatel Wireless Technologies Ltd. and is not to be disclosed without the written consent of Novatel Wireless Technologies Ltd. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic storage, reproduction, execution or transmission without the prior written consent of Novatel Wireless Technologies Ltd. The recipient of this document by its retention and use, agrees to respect the security status of the information contained herein. This document is intended for limited circulation. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice and should not be construed as a commitment by NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. unless such commitment is expressly given in a covering document. © Copyright NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (1999) NOVATEL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Calgary, Alberta TITLE: Hardware Interface Specification for Expedite Wireless IP Modem DOCUMENT NO.: OM-01016529 SHEET: 4 of 17 REV: 3.0 Table of Contents 1 WARNING........................................................................................................................................6 2 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................6 3 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................6 4 SPECIFICATIONS...........................................................................................................................6 4.1 Physical Interface......................................................................................................................6 4.1.1 Data/Power Connection......................................................................................................7 4.1.2 RF Antenna Connector Type...............................................................................................8 4.1.3 Pin Descriptions..................................................................................................................9 4.2 Host Interface Specifications...................................................................................................10 4.2.1 Serial Data Rate and Format............................................................................................10 4.3 Radio Specifications................................................................................................................10 4.3.1 Airlink Data Rate...............................................................................................................10 4.3.2 Recommended Antenna Type...........................................................................................10 4.3.3 Frequency Range.............................................................................................................10 4.3.4 Duplex Mode....................................................................................................................10 4.3.5 RF Power Class................................................................................................................10 4.4 Electrical Specifications...........................................................................................................11 4.5 Mechanical Specifications........................................................................................................12 4.5.1 Dimensions.......................................................................................................................12 4.5.2 Weight..............................................................................................................................12 4.6 Environmental Specifications...................................................................................................12 4.6.1 Temperature Range..........................................................................................................12 4.6.2 Humidity...............................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

To:Martin Perrine From:Dave Fry [email protected] Re:FCC ID EHANOVCDPD RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Applicant:Intermec Technologies Corporation Correspondence Reference Number:21421 731 Confirmation Number:EA663283 In regards to your recent application referenced above we kindly request that you provide the following additional information. A statement clarifying the EUT's maximum power. Numerous maximum powers levels were noted throughout the exhibits including: .11 W EIRP on Test report section 8.0 page 7 of 7, .6 W rating page 2 of 30 and on the EAS/Tech Specs, .822 W on page 7 of 30, 27.7 dBm conducted on page 13 of 30, 66.7 mW ERP on the SAR report cover sheet, and 109.4 mW on the cover sheet for the Assessment of Compliance. Use of maximum power is required for all tests. Please resubmit new data as appropriate. Further review will follow pending an answer to the above. Response: The radio tested is representative of current units provided from Novatel. All attempts to test a radio that shows a conducted power of .6 watts, see section 8.0 in the report body page 7 of 7. I will attempt to describe where all the power measurements listed above originate and their relevance to this application. .11 W EIRP in section 8.0 is the power that APREL lab measured for the characteristics of the Intermec 700 terminal antenna. This antenna is provided from Mobile Mark and has a stated gain of –6 dBi. APREL labs provided testing of EIRP of 109.4 mW that I rounded up to .11 W EIRP. When converting 109.4 mW EIRP = 66.7 mW ERP. .6 W rating on page 2 of 30 is the observed power of the radio initially tested for FCC approval under FCC ID: FCC ID: NBZNRM-6832 issued 4/14/1999. All attempts were made on Intermec’s part to obtain a radio that has similar power. We were only able to test a radio that had a power of .45 W conducted for SAR. Intermec submitted three radios to APREL that were provided directly from Novatel. Setting the power at the highest setting for all three radios we were only able to observe .45 W conducted. The power rating requested on the 731 form reflects the .6 W rating from the original grant. If need, please revise the 731 form to reflect .45 W as the conducted power. Since a standard connector is not offered on the Intermec 700 and the only antenna offered for sale by Intermec will be the one referenced in this application the EIRP of .11 W accurately represents the power observed for testing. .822W on page 7 of 30. This is the power radiated from a 2.15 dBi monopole antenna as tested in the original request for grant referenced above. 27.7 dBm conducted on page 13 of 30. This is the conducted in band occupied bandwidth test. Observation of 27.7 dBm that calculates to .6 W conducted is shown on the original grant for FCC ID: NBZNRM-6832. Intermec and APREL could not duplicate this power rating during any testing for the Intermec 700 terminal. 66.7 mW ERP on the SAR report cover sheet and 109.4 mW EIRP is the same as described above. It is impossible to repeat the testing at the .6 W conducted power that was originally tested for FCC ID: NBZNRM-6832. The conducted power for the three radios Intermec built for this testing showed a maximum conducted power of .45 W. I give the FCC permission to revise my 731 form to reflect a power rating of .45 Watts. All SAR testing of the radio in this application is tested at the highest power output available by the radio. A poor antenna design used on the Intermec 700 nets the .11 W EIRP and 66.7 mW ERP observed in the documents submitted. Novatel states the radio characteristics regarding occupied bandwidth, frequency stabilization and radiated spurious emissions are still represented by the report from Flom Associates. The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 60 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 2.917 (c) and forfeiture of the filing fee pursuant to section 1.1108. DO NOT reply to this e-mail by using the Reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at www.fcc.gov, Electronic Filing, OET Equipment Authorization Electronic Filing. If the response is submitted through Add Attachments, in order to expedite processing, a message which informs the processing staff that a new exhibit has been submitted must also be submitted via Submit Correspondence. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the e-mail address listed below the name of the sender.

A Company January 22, 2002 Intermec Technologies Corporation Systems and Solutions 550 Second Street S.E. Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Attestation transmitter conducted power. Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, Maryland 21046 FCC ID: EHANOVCDPD Subject: FCC Part 22.901(d) Certification Application for Intermec Technologies Corporation 700 handheld computer Gentlemen The Novatel Expedite radio power has caused some concern. Novatel has indicated, via the attached e-mail correspondence, the actual conducted power expected from the production versions of the radio installed in the Intermec 700. Hopefully this assists in satisfying the FCC that the transmitter power tested for SAR is sufficiently near the normal rating for the radio. Obtaining radios that will exhibit the maximum conducted power for a product and expecting those samples to maintain maximum conducted power during an extended period for SAR testing is nearly impossible. Novatel specifies the conducted power of the radio to be +26.8 dBm +/-0.5 dBm. This equates to a rating of 0.479 watts with a range of 0.537 to .0427 watts. The radios tested for SAR had a conducted power of 0.45 watts during testing. This is well within the typical range for the Expedite radio. Please contact me by telephone at (319) 846-2415 or by e-mail ([email protected]) if there are questions or additional information needed concerning this attestation. Yours truly, Dave Fry, Regulatory Engineer II Intermec Technologies Corporation EMC Test Laboratory 1/22/2002 2:09 PM Page 1 Fry, Dave From: Weldon Lemke [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:30 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: FW: Novatel Wireless Expedite - A question about TX power Here is the answer I got back on your question about TX power on the Expedite. Please note that this is for the Expedite (NRM 6832), as the NRM 6812 is not an active product any longer (I saw that you mentioned the 6812 once below). Weldon -----Original Message----- From: Sherry Smilar Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:59 PM To: Weldon Lemke; Sean Kozicki Subject: RE: Novatel Wireless Expedite - A question about TX power The quick answer is the Expedite modems assume that a 1.2 dB gain antenna will be attached. With a 1.2 dB antenna, the Expedite meets the 0.6 Watt Specification. The Expedites are tested to 26.8 +/- 0.5 dBm, which means the maximum out of manufacturing should be 27.3 dBm or 0.537 W. Typically they will be 26.8 dBm or 0.479 W. Sherry -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:52 AM To: [email protected]; Weldon Lemke Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Novatel Wireless Expedite - A question about TX power Yusi, and Ron Attached is the FCC Grant issued for the Expedite radio. It shows the "Conducted" power at the time of FCC filing at 0.6 Watts. The test report on file with the FCC shows TX power at 0.6 W. When integrators such as Intermec place the radio within a "Portable" unit, the FCC requires Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) testing of radio frequency energy. The FCC requires this testing to be done with a radio that delivers the rated power. In August 2001, I had 3 units with the Expedite radio installed. During testing of the Intermec 700 unit an ERP test was performed at APREL laboratories, and confirmed here at our facility. Our 700 units was only putting out 0.066 Watts ERP. During diagnostics testing we observed only 0.45 Watts conducted power from the three radios. The FCC review of our application is being scrutinized because we are using the Novatel FCC report and referencing the 0.6 W rating, however we only tested SAR at 0.45 W. Therefore the FCC is requesting we sample the radios to verify the "Conducted" power is consistent with the SAR test power of 0.45 W. If the conducted power of the radios is at the 0.6W rating the FCC is requiring the SAR testing to be repeated and I will have to file a Class II Permissive change to notify the FCC of the new safe distances and SAR levels. 1/22/2002 2:09 PM Page 2 Ultimately for the future, I will have to insist on radios that perform as rated according to the FCC Grant. If the Expedite radio currently being produced is consist and only delivering 0.45W there is little anyone can do. However since RF safety is a major issue with the regulatory agencies, the on going problem of verifying conducted power will have to be addressed. See the attached .pdf showing the FCC Grant. <<Novatel FCCID NBZNRM-6832 Original Grant.PDF>> I believe Intermec is requesting Novatel to verify the conducted power of the Expedite radio. Are we to expect radios that deliver 0.6 or 0.45 Watts? Thanks, Best Regards, Dave Fry Regulatory Engineer, > Intermec Technologies Corporation EMC Test Lab Mail Stop: GR05 550 Second St SE Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 mailto:[email protected] phone 319 846-2415 fax 319 846-2475 > -----Original Message----- > From: Leonard, Ron > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:02 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Cc: Fry, Dave > Subject: Novatel Wireless Expedite - A question about TX power > > Hi Yusi, > > I'm one of the engineers at Intermec Technologies working on radio > integrations, and one of the projects we are trying to finish up is the > agency approval of the Expedite modem (NRM-6812) which is an option for > one of our pocket PC products. We've met once, quite some time ago. > > The issue we are experiencing is related to the transmit power of the > Expedite. A combination of measured low conducted power (450mW) from the > radio, with an antenna which has low gain characteristics (-6 dBi), is > causing the regulatory agency to lean towards a conditional product > approval for operation at 450mW with sample testing required to ensure > that the radio does not operate at 600mW. If samples are found to …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

To:Martin Perrine FCC Application Processing Branch From:Dave Fry Date: Jan.22, 2002 Re:FCC ID EHANOVCDPD Applicant:Intermec Technologies Corporation Correspondence Reference Number:21720 731 Confirmation Number:EA663283 Martin, My responses will be Bold Italic below the issues raised in this request for information. The referenced application has been received for processing by the Applications Processing Branch and has been assigned the above 731 Confirmation Number. To ensure confidentiality, the 731 Confirmation Number along with the FCCID must be entered when checking for the status of a pending application via the Equipment Authorization WEB Page. Information regarding your application status and/or updating your application can be found by accessing www.fcc.gov, Electronic Filing, OET Equipment Authorization Electronic Filing. The FCC clarifies question 3 from correspondence 21541 and requests clarification from your answer to correspondence 21421. Regarding FCC question 3 from correspondence 21541 listed below, a precedence has been found to allow use of test data from a previous grant on a case by case basis. New radiated spurious data is considered sufficient to address this question. Question from correspondence 21541 "3) Please perform tests for all data reported in Appendix G. Appendix G appears to contain a report made for the earlier filing mentioned above." The FCC EAS system has a report labeled 20020117-1 that shows the results of radiated spurious emissions testing of the radio when installed within the Intermec 700. Please clarify your answer to correspondence 21421. You state "Since a standard connector is not offered on the Intermec 700 and the only antenna offered for sale by Intermec will be the one referenced in this application the......". However, in you section 8.0 of your test report on page 7 of 7 you state "The resulting EIRP indicates a very poor antenna design with a gain of -6.5 dBi.......We anticipate the antennas for production versions will exhibit a gain closer to -5.5 dBi. " Please confirm that the -6.5 dBi antenna is the final production unit. If so please remove the above statement from the test report. The EAS system now contains a revised report 20010830-1 to address the issue of antenna gain. Also see an added attestation to clarify the conducted power from the Expedite radio. This point is also repeated in the revised 20010830-1 report. FYI It is understood that this unit has a permanently mounted antenna. For this reason the measured ERP value of 66 mW reported will be placed on the grant. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the e-mail address listed below the name of the sender.

A Company January 24, 2002 Intermec Technologies Corporation Systems and Solutions 550 Second Street S.E. Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Federal Communications Commission Equipment Authorization Division Application Processing Branch 7435 Oakland Mills Rd. Columbia, Md. 21046 FCC ID: EHANOVCDPD Subject : Letter requesting confidentiality of Intermec Technologies and Novatel Wireless Technologies, Ltd. radio modem device FCC Certification application. Dear Sirs, Pursuant to CFR 47 Chapter 1 Section 0.459, Intermec Technologies Corporation and Novatel Wireless Technologies, Ltd. requests that the following identified detailed technical information regarding the Novatel Expedite radio modem device, presented herein installed the Intermec 700 hand held computer, be held confidential by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and as such be withheld from public inspection. Pursuant to CFR 47 Chapter 1 Sections 0.457(d) and 0.457(d)(2)(i) the exhibits contain details of trade secrets and technical data that is customarily guarded from competitors and not released to the public by Novatel Wireless Technologies, Ltd. The following Exhibits with specific sections described, submitted with the Form 731 Attachments should be held confidential: Technical Description Block Diagram Schematic Diagram Parts List Tune-Up Procedure Sincerely, Dave Fry, Regulatory Engineer II Intermec Technologies Corporation EMC Test Laboratory

A Company October 25, 2001 Intermec Technologies Corporation Systems and Solutions 550 Second Street S.E. Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Federal Communications Commission Equipment Authorization Division Application Processing Branch 7435 Oakland Mills Rd. Columbia, Md. 21046 FCC ID: EHANOVCDPD Subject: FCC Part 22.901(d) Certification Application for Intermec Technologies Corporation 700 handheld computer. This is to inform that Intermec Technologies Corporation is submitting a new filing for the 700 hand held computer for Part 22 Certification. The 700 has a Novatel radio modem integrated within to allow wireless data communication. Novatel via M. Flom Associates has completed all required tests in compliance with Parts 2 and 22 of the FCC Rules. SAR testing and Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) testing was completed by APREL Laboratories and with satisfactory results as provided in the attached Exhibits. All required tests in compliance with Part 15 of the FCC Rules have been completed by Intermec Technologies with satisfactory results and kept on file for “Declaration of Conformity” requirements pursuant to Section 15.101(b) and (c)(1) of FCC rules. Intermec Technologies Corporation would like to request confidentiality as indicated in the Form 731, Item 8 and as requested in the letter detailing those items to be kept confidential. Please do hesitate to call at (319) 846-2415 or email at [email protected] should you require additional information or have any questions. Yours truly, Dave Fry, Regulatory Engineer II Intermec Technologies Corporation EMC Test Laboratory

A Company October 25, 2001 Intermec Technologies Corporation Systems and Solutions 550 Second Street S.E. Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 Federal Communications Commission Equipment Authorization Division Application Processing Branch 7435 Oakland Mills Rd. Columbia, Md. 21046 FCC ID: EHANOVCDPD Subject : Letter requesting confidentiality of Novatel Wireless Technologies, Ltd. radio modem device FCC Certification application. Dear Sirs, Pursuant to CFR 47 Chapter 1 Section 0.459, Intermec Technologies Corporation and Novatel Wireless Technologies, Ltd. requests that the following identified detailed technical information regarding the Novatel Expedite radio modem device, presented herein installed the Intermec 700 hand held computer, be held confidential by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and as such be withheld from public inspection. Pursuant to CFR 47 Chapter 1 Sections 0.457(d) and 0.457(d)(2)(i) the exhibits contain details of trade secrets and technical data that is customarily guarded from competitors and not released to the public by Novatel Wireless Technologies, Ltd. The following Exhibits with specific sections described, submitted with the Form 731 Attachments should be held confidential: Technical Description Block Diagram Schematic Diagram Mechanical and Assembly Drawings Parts List Tune-Up Procedure Sincerely, Dave Fry, Regulatory Engineer II Intermec Technologies Corporation EMC Test Laboratory

Intermec Technologies CorporationFCC ID: EHANOVCDPD EMC Test LabREPORT NO: 20010830-1 DOC. NO.: 577-500-993 Page 1 of 4 700 Novatel CDPD, SAR Portable, Appendix B, Radio Module External Photographs Technologies Corporation EMC Test Laboratory Cedar Rapids, IA MEASUREMENT/TECHNICAL REPORT Intermec Technologies Corporation 700 With Novatel CDPD Cellular Radio Module REPORT NO: 20010830-1 …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.