
Text extracted from the exhibit documents filed with the FCC. Open a document above to read the original.
The Utility Wireless Meter will never be sold to the General public. The device will only be sold to and used by Commercial Utility companies. Installation is made directly by Schlumberger. For this reason a user manual will never be made available. .
RE: Schlumberger Resource Management FCC ID: F9CCMM1303 F9C25-1962 I really want to move on these Applications and am not willing to make you or your client wait any additional time for a response. I have thought long and on your proposed Grant notes and I am convinced that this is not the appropriate way to go. The TCB process was set up to handle “routine” equipment authorizations only. In the case of RF exposure we are given a set of “canned” statements, which are deemed appropriate for most equipment. And the Commission has made it very clear they do not want deviations by the TCBs from that text The definitions of Fixed, Mobile and Portable are very arbitrary. Fixed devices are placed on outdoor permanent structures at least two (and sometimes 10) meters away from all persons. Portable devices concern themselves with the near-field phenomenon associated with the maximum power density of jumbled E and H fields as they leave a radiating structure. At in-between distances you have the “Mobile” designation – or devices that operate with safe distances from 20 cm (~7 inches) to 2 meters (~6.5 feet). I propose we use the original Grant notes without changes. Response: Schlumberger will accept the mobile grant condition for these devices. I have also included an RF Hazard statement for this application just in case and a user manual statement.
American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 June 20, 2001 RE: Schlumberger Resource Management FCC ID: F9CCMM1303 I have a few comments on this Application. 1.) The Application lists only 917 MHz as the emission frequency. The Operational Description indicates it is useable over 902 to 928 MHz. If this is so, then three frequencies should have been tested according to 15.31(m). Please address. 2.) No manual – either installation or owners – was received. For a product which requires professional installation, the installation guide should be sufficient. 3.) FYI: RF Exposure. The distinctions between Mobile and Fixed are legal and not engineering common sense. For a TCB to approve a fixed device it must maintain a distance of at least 2 meters from all persons. For a TCB to approve a mobile device 20 cm (~8 inches) is sufficient. In addition, there is the September 2000 deadline for all equipment to meet RF exposure guidelines. Therefore for all practical reasons, there is no such thing as a ”Categorical Exclusion” anymore. Any questions please call or write. Bill William H. Graff Examining Engineer President and Director of Engineering mailto:[email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.
RF Hazard Statement The instant device, a Part 15 spread spectrum transmitter, is a fixed device professionally installed inside an enclosed utility meter. Accordingly, the device is not to be used or sold to the general public. The antenna associated with the device is not external but is rather contained within the same utility meter enclosure. The device communicates with a fixed local area network. This transmitter does not fit within the definition of a “mobile device” set forth in section 2.1091(b) of the Commission’s rules Part 2, because it is to be used in fixed locations. Also, per Section 1.1037(b)(1), which is referenced by section 15.247(b)(4), categorically excludes this part 15 device from the requirements to conduct a routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure. In any event, based on the maximum output power and antenna gain information contained in the underlying equipment authorization application, the RF Hazard level form the antenna device are below the maximum exposure limits set forth in Section 1.1310.
RF Warning Statement in Installation Guide WARNING While this device is in operation, a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters must be maintained between the radiating antenna and the body of all persons exposed to the antenna in order to meet the FCC RF exposure guidelines. This statement will be place in the installation guide were the installer can see it when performing final installation of the wireless utility meter.
File: R43533 May 25, 2001 American TCB 6731 Whittier Avenue McLean, VA 22101 Gentlemen: The enclosed documents constitute a formal submittal and application for a Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to Subpart C of Part 15 of FCC Rules (CFR 47) regarding intentional radiators. Data within this report demonstrates that the equipment tested complies with the FCC limits for intentional radiators. Elliott Laboratories, as duly authorized agent prepared this submittal. A copy of the letter of our appointment as agent is enclosed. If there are any questions or if further information is needed, please contact Elliott Laboratories for assistance. Sincerely, David W. Bare Chief Technical Officer DWB/pjp Enclosures: Agent Authorization Letter Emissions Test Report with Exhibits File: R43533 Page 1 of 16 Electromagnetic Emissions Test Report and Application for Grant of Equipment Authorization pursuant to FCC Part 15, Subpart C Specifications for an Intentional Radiator on the Schlumberger - RMS Div. Model: kV MFMM FCC ID: F9CCMM1303 GRANTEE: Schlumberger - RMS Div. 125 Shoreway Road San Carlos, CA 94070 TEST SITE: Elliott Laboratories, Inc. 684 W. Maude Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 REPORT DATE: May 25, 2001 FINAL TEST DATE: May 7 and May 14, 2001 AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY: ______________________________ David W. Bare Chief Technical Officer Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: May 25, 2001 File: R43533 Page 2 of 16 pages This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Elliott Laboratories, Inc. Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: May 25, 2001 File: R43533 Page 3 of 16 pages TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE...................................................................................................................................................................................1 TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................................................................3 SCOPE............................................................................................................................................................................................5 OBJECTIVE...................................................................................................................................................................................5 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE..............................................................................................................................................5 EMISSION TEST RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................6 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE.....................................................................................................6 LIMITS OF ANTENNA CONDUCTED POWER..................................................................................................................6 LIMITS OF RADIATED INTERFERENCE FIELD STRENGTH..........................................................................................7 LIMITS OF POWER AND BANDWIDTH............................................................................................................................7 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES....................................................................................................................................8 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) DETAILS..........................................................................................................................8 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................................................................8 OTHER EUT DETAILS.............................................................................................................................................................8 ENCLOSURE..............................................................................................................................................................................8 MODIFICATIONS.....................................................................................................................................................................8 THE EUT DID NOT REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS DURING TESTING IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS......................................................................................................................................................................8 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT...........................................................................................................................................................9 EUT INTERFACE PORTS........................................................................................................................................................9 TEST SOFTWARE....................................................................................................................................................................9 ANTENNA SYSTEM................................................................................................................................................................9 TEST SITE....................................................................................................................................................................................10 GENERAL INFORMATION...................................................................................................................................................10 CONDUCTED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS...............................................................................................................10 RADIATED EMISSIONS CONSIDERATIONS....................................................…
Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.
EMC Test Data Model kV MFMM FCC 15.247 B Environment: Class: EMC Test Data For The Schlumberger Schlumberger kV MFMM Doug Gronberg J43284 T43286 David Bare Job Number: T-Log Number: Proj Eng: Emissions Spec: Immunity Spec: Contact: Client: Model: T-Log: T43286.xls, Rev 1.0CoverPage 1 of 18 EMC Test Data 1None-- Modification History Mod. #TestDateModification Contact: Doug Gronberg Immunity Spec: Manufacturer General Description B Environment: Class:FCC 15.247 Client: Model: J43284 T43286 Schlumberger kV MFMM David Bare Job Number: T-Log Number: Proj Eng: KV MFMMDSSS Transmitter Emissions Spec: DescriptionModel Schlumberger EUT INFORMATION Serial Number Equipment Under Test The EUT is a direct sequence spread spectrum transmitter which is designed to work with elcetric power meter to enable continuall monitoring of power usage. Normally, the EUT would be pole mounted during operation. The EUT was, therefore, treated as table top equipment during testing to simulate the end user environment. The electrical rating of the EUT is 120V, 60 Hz The EUT consists of the transmitter and the power meter. The meter is manufactured by GE. The EUT does not have an enclosure as it will be installed inside a utility meter. EUT Enclosure 143 FCC ID Other EUT Details T-Log: T43286.xls, Rev 1.0EUT DescripPage 2 of 18 EMC Test Data Note 1: Schlumberger (Note 1)none 20cm coax SMA to SMB adaptor none None ManufacturerDescription 2Power inAC MainsPower cordUnshielded kV Shielded or UnshieldedEUT Port Cable(s) Length(m) Used during antenna port conducted Runs. 1.4dB loss at 917MHz Serial NumberModel DescriptionConnected To FCC ID 37076930 none Doug Gronberg FCC 15.247 B Environment: Class: Client: Model: Schlumberger kV MFMM J43284 T43286 David Bare Job Number: T-Log Number: Proj Eng: Emissions Spec: Immunity Spec: Contact: GE Manufacturer Test Configuration #1 ModelDescriptionSerial Number Watt-Hr. meter The UET was continually transmitting at 917.58 MHz. EUT Operation During Emissions Local Support Equipment Remote Support Equipment EUT Interface Ports ---- FCC ID T-Log: T43286.xls, Rev 1.0Test Configuration #1Page 3 of 18 EMC Test Data Client: Contact: Spec: Test Specifics General Test Configuration Ambient Conditions: Summary of Results Result Pass Pass Pass Pass N/A No modifications were made to the EUT during testing Processing Gain15.247(e) Manufacturer to provide data. 3 4 5 Modifications Made During Testing: Power Spectral Density (PSD)15.247(d)3.04dBm -5dB margin Output Power15.247(b) 23.12dBm -6.18dB margin 6dB Bandwidth15.247(a) 1.39MHzBW .89MHz Margin 1RE, 1000 - 10000 MHz - Spurious Emissions In Restricted Bands FCC Part 15.209 / 15.247( c) -7.5@ 3670.32MHz 2 Margin Rel. Humidity: 23 Run #Test PerformedLimit The EUT and all local support equipment were located on the turntable for radiated spurious emissions testing. For radiated emissions testing the measurement antenna was located 3 meters from the EUT. When measuring the conducted emissions from the EUT's antenna port, the antenna port of the EUT was connected to the spectrum analyzer or power meter via a suitable attenuator to prevent overloading the measurement system. All measurements are corrected to allow for the external attenuators used. Temperature: 31°C Test Location: SVOATS #3EUT Voltage: 120V/60Hz Test Engineer: Chris/JayConfig Change: None Radiated Emissions Objective: The objective of this test session is to perform final qualification testing of the EUT with respect to the specification listed above. Date of Test: 5/7/2001Config. Used: 1 Doug Gronberg FCC 15.247Class: N/A SchlumbergerJob Number: J43284 Model: kV MFMMT-Log Number: T43286 Proj Eng: David Bare T-Log: T43286.xls, Rev 1.0RADIO 07-May-01Page 4 of 18 EMC Test Data Client: Contact: Spec: Doug Gronberg FCC 15.247Class: N/A SchlumbergerJob Number: J43284 Model: kV MFMMT-Log Number: T43286 Proj Eng: David Bare Run #1: Radiated Spurious Emissions, 1000-10000 MHz. Transmitting @ 917.58 MHz. Sorted by margin EUT using the OOK modulation scheme FrequencyLevelPolDetectorAzimuthHeightComments MHz dBμV/m v/hLimitMarginPk/QP/Avgdegreesmeters 3670.32066.5v 74.0-7.5Pk1001.0 3670.32044.5v 54.0-9.5Avg1001.0 Note 1 4587.90063.4v 74.0-10.6Pk121.0 4587.90038.9v 54.0-15.1Avg121.0 Note 1 3670.32058.6h 74.0-15.4Pk351.3 4587.90058.1h 74.0-15.9Pk301.3 2752.89058.1v 74.0-15.9Pk2831.0 9175.80055.6h 74.0-18.4Pk01.0 Noise floor 9175.80055.4v 74.0-18.6Pk01.0 Noise floor 8258.22054.9v 74.0-19.1Pk01.0 Noise floor 3670.32034.5h 54.0-19.5Avg351.3 Note 1 2752.89054.4h 74.0-19.6Pk01.3 7340.64054.1v 74.0-19.9Pk201.0 4587.90034.1h 54.0-19.9Avg301.3 Note 1 2752.89033.8v 54.0-20.2Avg2831.0 Note 1 8258.22053.4h 74.0-20.6Pk01.0 Noise floor 7340.64052.7h 74.0-21.4Pk01.0 Noise floor 5505.48051.6h 74.0-22.4Pk3451.0 5505.48051.2v 74.0-22.8Pk261.0 7340.64029.3v 54.0-24.7Avg201.0 Note 1 9175.80029.1h 54.0-24.9Avg01.0 Note 1; Noise floor 8258.22028.6v 54.0-25.4Avg01.0 Note 1; Noise floor 5505.48027.7h 54.0-26.3Avg3451.0 Note 1 7340.64027.2h 54.0-26.8Avg01.0 Note 1; Noise floor 9175.80026.8v 54.0-27.2Avg01.0 Note 1; Noise floor 5505.48026.7v 54.0-27.3Avg261.0 Note 1 2752.89026.4h 54.0-27.6Avg01.3 Note 1 8258.22026.3h 54.0-27.7Avg01.0 Note 1; Noise floor Note 1: Deviations From The Standard No deviations were made from the requirements of the standard. 12.8dB subtracted from the measured average readings for duty cycle correction. 15.209 / 15.247 T-Log: T43286.xls, Rev 1.0RADIO 07-May-01Page 5 of 18 EMC Test Data Client: Contact: Spec: Doug Gronberg FCC 15.247Class: N/A SchlumbergerJob Number: J43284 Model: kV MFMMT-Log Number: T43286 Proj Eng: David Bare Run #2: Signal Bandwidth Channel Resolution Bandwidth Mid100kHz Run #3: Output Power Channel Res BW Mid3MHz Run #4: Power Spectral Density ChannelRes BW Low3kHz917.3553.04dBmT43286/006 Frequency (MHz) P.S.D. (averaged over 1 second in a 3kHz bandwidth) Graph reference # T43286/005 23.12dBm Frequency (MHz)Output PowerGraph reference # 917.355T43286/004 Frequency (MHz)6dB…
Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.
Engineer: JayManufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due EMCO Biconical Antenna, 30-300 MHz 3110B 801 11 10/12/2000 10/12/2001 EMCO Horn Antenna, D. Ridge 1-18GHz 3115 868 12 10/26/2000 10/26/2001 EMCO LISN, 10kHz-100MHz 3825/2 1292 12 4/12/2001 4/12/2002 EMCO Log Periodic Antenna, 0.3-1 GHz 3146A 364 12 8/17/2000 8/17/2001 Fluke Mfg Co Signal Generator, 100KHz - 2100MHz 6062A 852 N/A Hewlett Packard High Pass filter, 1.5GHz P/N 84300-80037 1158 12 2/28/2001 2/28/2002 Hewlett Packard Microwave Preamplifier, 1-26.5GHz 8449B 263 12 8/3/2000 8/3/2001 Hewlett Packard Spectrum Analyzer 9KHz - 26GHz 8563E 284 12 2/22/2001 2/22/2002 Rohde& Schwarz Pulse Limiter ESH3 Z2 811 12 7/11/2000 7/11/2001 Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 0.009-30 MHz ESH3 215 12 10/5/2000 10/5/2001 Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 20-1300MHz ESVP 273 12 10/5/2000 10/5/2001 Engineer: JayManufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due Elliott Laboratories FCC / CISPR LISN LISN-3, OATS 304 12 6/12/2000 6/12/2001 Rohde& Schwarz Pulse Limiter ESH3 Z2 811 12 7/11/2000 7/11/2001 Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 0.009-30 MHz ESH3 215 12 10/5/2000 10/5/2001 Engineer: JayManufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due Hewlett Packard EMC Spectrum Analyzer 9kHz - 6.5GHz 8595EM 780 12 1/30/2001 1/30/2002 Hewlett Packard EMC Spectrum Analyzer, Opt. 026 9 KHz -26.5GHz 8593EM 1141 12 2/16/2001 2/16/2002 Engineer: ChrisManufacturer Description Model # Assett # Cal interval Last Calibrated Cal Due EMCO Horn Antenna, D. Ridge 1-18GHz 3115 868 12 10/26/2000 10/26/2001 EMCO Log Periodic Antenna, 0.3-1 GHz 3146A 364 12 8/17/2000 8/17/2001 Hewlett Packard EMC Spectrum Analyzer, Opt. 026 9 KHz -26.5GHz 8593EM 1141 12 2/16/2001 2/16/2002 Hewlett Packard High Pass filter, 1.5GHz P/N 84300-80037 1158 12 2/28/2001 2/28/2002 Hewlett Packard Microwave Preamplifier, 1-26.5GHz 8449B 785 12 1/25/2001 1/25/2002 Rohde & Schwarz Test Receiver, 20-1300MHz ESVP 273 12 10/5/2000 10/5/2001 Conducted and Radiated Emissions, 07-May-01 05:05 PMConducted Emissions, 14-May-01 01:14 PMConducted Emissions Antenna Port, 14-May-01 01:16 PMRadiated Emissions, 30 - 10000 MHz, 15-May-01 06:42 PM File: T43286.xls Test Equipment (Emissions) 1 of 1
Process Gain Measurement for Better LAN Transceiver (BLT) 1 of 4 Process Gain Measurement for BLT with FCC ID H6N26061200 Method The processing gain is measured using the CW jamming method. The equipment arrangement is shown in the block diagram below. Process Gain Tests Configuration Procedure A signal generator is stepped in 50kHz increments across the passband of the system. At each point the generator level required to produce a bit error rate equivalent to 2.7 x 10E-3, the threshold of designed performance for the system, is recorded as the jammer level (J). The output power of the transmitter is measured at the same point and recorded as signal (S). The jammer to signal ratio (J/S) is then calculated with 20% of the worst data points discarded. The lowest remaining J/S ratio is used to calculate the processing gain using the formula: Gp = (S/N)o + Mj + Lsys The theoretical probability of error vs. S/N is shown in the curve below, obtained from section 4.3.2 of Digital Communications, second edition, John G. Proakis, McGraw-Hill. Screen Room Source Transmitter 2 way Divide Calibrated Attn. DUT Power Meter PC Controller/ Display Unit Decade Attn. Signal Generator HP8647A SIO Process Gain Measurement for Better LAN Transceiver (BLT) 2 of 4 16-Orthogonal Signalling Probability of Error Curve 05101520 1 . 10 6 1 . 10 5 1 . 10 4 1 . 10 3 0.01 0.1 1 SNR (dB) Probability of Error Process Gain Measurement for Better LAN Transceiver (BLT) 3 of 4 For the threshold error rate of 2.7 x 10E-3, the theoretical Signal to Noise ratio is 11.9 dB. Results With: (S/N)o = 11.9dB Lsys = 2dB Mj = 2.3dB Gp = 11.9dB + 2.3dB +2dB = 16.2dB Conclusion: Every data point exhibited a processing gain greater than 10 dB Tabulated Jamming Test Results Pass band = 917.58MHz ± 1.2MHz Jmmr Freq.DeviationJammerSig. InJ/S Ratio (in MHz)(KHz)(dBm)(dBm)(dB) 916.381200-107.7-1113.3 916.431150-108.2-1112.8 916.481100-108.2-1112.8 916.531050-108.7-1112.3 916.581000-108.7-1112.3 916.63950-108.7-1112.3 916.68900-108.7-1112.3 916.73850-108.7-1112.3 916.78800-108.7-1112.3 916.83750-108.7-1112.3 916.88700-108.7-1112.3 916.93650-108.7-1112.3 916.98600-108.7-1112.3 917.03550-108.7-1112.3 917.08500-108.7-1112.3 917.13450-109.2-1111.8 917.18400-109.7-1111.3 917.23350-108.7-1112.3 917.28300-109.2-1111.8 917.33250-108.7-1112.3 917.38200-108.7-1112.3 917.43150-107.7-1113.3 917.48100-108.7-1112.3 917.5350-107.2-1113.8 Process Gain Measurement for Better LAN Transceiver (BLT) 4 of 4 917.580-107.2-1113.8 917.63-50-107.2-1113.8 917.68-100-106.7-1114.3 917.73-150-107.2-1113.8 917.78-200-107.7-1113.3 917.83-250-107.7-1113.3 917.88-300-107.7-1113.3 917.93-350-108.2-1112.8 917.98-400-108.2-1112.8 918.03-450-107.7-1113.3 918.08-500-106.7-1114.3 918.13-550-106.7-1114.3 918.18-600-107.2-1113.8 918.23-650-106.2-1114.8 918.28-700-106.2-1114.8 918.33-750-106.7-1114.3 918.38-800-106.2-1114.8 918.43-850-106.7-1114.3 918.48-900-106.2-1114.8 918.53-950-105.7-1115.3 918.58-1000-105.7-1115.3 918.63-1050-105.2-1115.8 918.68-1100-104.7-1116.3 918.73-1150-104.2-1116.8 918.78-1200-103.7-1117.3 Of the 49 data points, 80% have a J/S ratio of 2.3 dB or better
Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: May 25, 2001 File: R43533 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT 3: Radiated Emissions Test Configuration Photographs Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: May 25, 2001 File: R43533 Page 2 of 4 EXHIBIT 3: Radiated Emissions Test Configuration Photographs Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: May 25, 2001 File: R43533 Page 3 of 4 EXHIBIT 4: Conducted Emissions Test Configuration Photographs Elliott Laboratories, Inc. -- EMC Department Test Report Report Date: May 25, 2001 File: R43533 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT 4: Conducted Emissions Test Configuration Photographs
125 Shoreway Road · San Carlos, California · United States
| # | Rule Parts | Frequency Range | Power Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15C | 917.58 MHz - 917.58 MHz | 200.00 mW |

ELECTRICITY METER WITH DUAL RF TRANSMITTERS
Equipment Class
DXX - Part 15 Low Power Communication Device Transmitter
Electricity Meter with Dual RF Transmitters
Equipment Class
DSS - Part 15 Spread Spectrum Transmitter
Wireless LAN Radio
Equipment Class
DSS - Part 15 Spread Spectrum Transmitter
BLT 3 LAN Transceiver
Equipment Class
DSS - Part 15 Spread Spectrum Transmitter
Utility Meter Transmitter
Equipment Class
DSS - Part 15 Spread Spectrum Transmitter