J9CGSDF1Globalstar Digital Fixed User Terminal

® 6455 Lusk Boulevard, San Diego, California 92121 (619) 587-1121 http://www.qualcomm.com May 17, 1999 Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Re:Correction of FCC ID No. Assignment: FCC ID: J9CGSDF2 Change Request Gentlepeople: Please change all references to FCC ID: J9CGSDF2 in this filing to FCC ID: J9CGSDF1. Due to Internet communications difficulties on Friday May 14, the Form 731 and attachments originally intended for filing under FCC ID: J9CGSDF1 were temporarily filed under FCC ID: J9CGSDF2. Per Applicant request filed earlier under FCC ID: J9CGSDF1, all files filed under that FCC ID were to be deleted as was that FCC ID number assignment itself, making that FCC ID Number again available for assignment. The end result will be one filing under FCC ID: J9CGSDF1 and the electronic Form 731 confirmation number currently assigned to FCC ID: J9CGSDF2, including executed Form 731 and all attachments/exhibits. If any further information is required please contact myself or Paul Guckian. You may contact me directly by phone at 619-658-3542, by fax at 619-651-1982, or by e-mail at [email protected]. You may contact Paul Guckian directly by phone at 619- 651-1547, by fax at 619-651-1988, or by e-mail at [email protected]. Very truly yours, William E. Moyer Sr. Engineer, EMC & Regulatory

[email protected],8/24/99 3:54 PM -0700,Requested Information for FCC ID J9 To: [email protected] From: Bill Moyer x8-3542 <[email protected]> Subject: Requested Information for FCC ID J9CGSDF1, EA94247 Filing Cc: pguckian, kstambau Bcc: X-Attachments: Frank Coperich: This e-mail will be printed to disk using PDFWriter and submitted as an attachment pdf file via the filing submissions Webpage. It is also being sent to you directly in parallel so that we will have a record of what was submitted, that being something the Webpage does not always provide due to time-out problems. My responses to your specific questions and comments are interleaved below in blue italics so they may be more readily discerned. >Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 14:30:47 -0400 >From: [email protected] (OET) >To: wmoyer >Subject: > >To:William Moyer, Qualcomm Incorporated >From:Frank Coperich >[email protected] >FCC Application Processing Branch > >Re:FCC ID J9CGSDF1 >Applicant:Qualcomm Incorporated >Correspondence Reference Number:9097 >731 Confirmation Number:EA94247 >Date of Original E-Mail:08/05/1999 > > >1.) Many of the files uploaded thru the EAS system were not in the proper Exhibit location, i.e. external photos should be put into the external photos Exhibit and so on. This misdirection of files slows down the review process. Understood. We will subdivide our future filings so external photos are separated from internal photos and so forth. > >2.) Several unnecessary files were received. These were the EMC Test Report and Test Plan, addressing non-FCC issues. Note that we must review all files sent to be sure of finding any appropriate test data or description. Sending of unnecessary files slows down the review process. The internal and external color photos and the case and cable radiated out-of-band and spurious unintentional emissions test data were taken from the TUV EMC test report. That document is required to be copied and distributed only in its entirety per its copyright statement, unless explicit written permission to do otherwise is obtained from TUV. In the interests of expediting the filing submission, the entire document was submitted, rather than extracting the color photos and those portions of the test report documenting the radiated emissions test results and obtaining permission to distribute that subset of the test report document. The color photos were submitted in parallel as separate pdf 1Printed for Bill Moyer x8-3542 <[email protected]> [email protected],8/24/99 3:54 PM -0700,Requested Information for FCC ID J9 files only because the entire document including the color photographs was too large to fit through the FCC electronic filing Webpage filter. The test plan was provided because it has been my experience that EMC test plans are necessary to understand EMC test reports. > >3.) Many files were marked as Confidential which do not qualify for Confidential status. These correspond to the Items 1 thru 8 of your Confidentiality request letter. Confidentiality requests were driven by fact that the source documents were labeled with various Qualcomm or Globalstar propriety, confidential, or limited distribution statements or in fact (in the case of the EMC test plan provided for the reasons disclosed in Response 2 above and in the case of the System Description document) contained information which we do not believe should be disseminated beyond the distribution lists and the FCC or other administrations. > >4.) Note that the DFUT Installation Guide does not cover the RAU. The DFUT Installation Guide, submitted as file E.12 80-25811-1X2.pdf, deals explicitly with the installation of the DFUT RAU and Junction Box. Is it possible that you are referring to the DFUT Deskset Users manual, submitted as file E.11 80-25800-1X2.pdf, which addresses the DFUT Deskset user interface? The only other possibility is that you did not receive a complete DFUT Installation Guide in the electronic submission, although the nature of your comments in Question 9, wherein you cross-compared the DFUT and AFUT Installation Guides, implies that you did receive the DFUT Installation Guide. > >5.) Please note that we do need the 700 Hz narrow band measurement of emissions. This test / specification is intended to show concentrated emissions that would not otherwise be visible in a wide band (averaged) measurement. At your behest narrowband emissions measurements have been taken for Channel 1, the lowest frequency and hence worst case channel with respect to emissions in the 1559-1605 MHz band, using a fixed notch filter centered on the Channel 1 frequency. The supplemental narrowband emissions test plan and report showing the results will be uploaded as attachment files E.3b UT Pt. 25 NB OOBE TP.pdf and E.4b DFUT NB OOBE TR.pdf. Due to limitations of spectrum analyzers, 700 Hz resolution bandwidth measurements cannot be made directly and hence 1 kHz and 300 Hz measurements were made with appropriate bandwidth correction factors. As anticipated, all narrowband spectral content revealed was well below the broadband noise signature previously measured. Similar data will be obtained and submitted for the other Globalstar UT filings. > >6.) Please note that your Plots on Pages 9 thru 32 of the OOBE test report are not legible. Apologies for the quality of the plots, they were the best then available. At the time those measurements were made we had not yet gotten the spectrum analyzer-to-pc interface software to work properly and hence used an old available dot-matrix printer. In supplement to the previously-submitted manual OOBE test plan and report, we are uploading 2Printed for Bill Moyer x8-3542 <[email protected]> [email protected],8/24/99 3:54 PM -0700,Requested Information for FCC ID J9 the following additional DFUT files from our automated compliance test lab: E.3a 80-98735-1_x1.pdf and E.4a DFUT n&s data.pdf. These files, obtained originally for ETSI TBR-41 testing, have clear and easy to read plots with all l…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

[email protected],9/1/99 4:50 PM -0700,Ref. No. 9497: Requested Information To: [email protected] From: Bill Moyer x8-3542 <[email protected]> Subject: Ref. No. 9497: Requested Information for FCC ID: J9CGSDF1, EA94247 Filing Cc: pguckian, jmoulton, kstambau Bcc: X-Attachments: Frank Coperich: This e-mail will be printed to disk using PDFWriter and submitted as an attachment pdf file via the filing submissions Webpage. It is also being sent to you directly in parallel so that we will have a record of what was submitted. My responses to your comments are interleaved below (in blue italics) so they may be more readily discerned. >Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 10:05:07 -0400 >From: [email protected] (OET) >To: wmoyer >Subject: > >To:William Moyer, Qualcomm Incorporated >From:Frank Coperich >[email protected] >FCC Application Processing Branch > >Re:FCC ID J9CGSDF1 >Applicant:Qualcomm Incorporated >Correspondence Reference Number:9479 >731 Confirmation Number:EA94247 >Date of Original E-Mail:09/01/1999 > > >The issue regarding the status of Items 1 thru 8 of your confidentiality request letter remains unresolved. > >In general, test data and test procedures do not qualify for Confidential status. > >Installation manuals and users manual may be eligible for Confidential status if there is a non-disclosure agreement with the party which is in possession of the manuals. > >Please further address this remaining Confidentiality issue. > >Also, as cited in this Form letter - please reply to this message using the EAS Correspondence # when uploading Exhibits. We withdraw our request for confidentiality of items 1 through 8 of our DFUT confidentiality request letter. Note please that similar files (test plans, test reports, and a copy of the Globalstar System Description) were provided for each of the 5 Globalstar UT filings (DFUT: EA94247, SMP UT: EA94445, TMP UT: EA94735, AFUT: EA94736, and Car Kit: EA94778). We also hereby withdraw the request for confidentiality for those attachment files for each of these Globalstar UT filings. It is hoped that by so stating now, we can minimize the review time for those UT filings for which we have not received formal FCC comments, but which logically would reflect the comments to the DFUT and TMP filings. > >The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 60 1Printed for Bill Moyer x8-3542 <[email protected]> [email protected],9/1/99 4:50 PM -0700,Ref. No. 9497: Requested Information days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 2.917 (c) and forfeiture of the filing fee pursuant to section 1.1108. > >DO NOT reply to this e-mail by using the Reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at www.fcc.gov, Electronic Filing, OET Equipment Authorization Electronic Filing. If the response is submitted through Add Attachments, in order to expedite processing, a message which informs the processing staff that a new exhibit has been submitted must also be submitted via Submit Correspondence. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. > >Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the e-mail address listed below the name of the sender. > 2Printed for Bill Moyer x8-3542 <[email protected]>

DFUT Installation Guide (80-25811-1 X2) Errata Sheet Input MPE Distance Restriction Statement to be Added to Step 1. Safety Considerations: RF Safety Note: RF field intensity at the surface of the transmitting Globalstar antenna is fairly high. Maintaining a minimum line-of-sight separation distance of 35 cm (14 inches) between the transmitting antenna and all personnel will ensure that the General Population / Uncontrolled Exposure maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits are not exceeded. This satisfies the MPE limits mandated by the FCC in 47 CFR Ch. 1 (10-1-98 Edition), Part 1, §1.1310 and defined in the ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 standard. It also satisfies the slightly more-stringent European and international exposure limit recommendations of the International Radiation Protection Association (in the IRPA Guidelines on Protection Against Non-Ionizing Radiation, 1991) and of the International Commission on Non- Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), 1996.

3-3-99 GS UT NB OOBE Test Plan 1 of 7 Globalstar User Terminal Transmitter Antenna Port Conducted Narrowband Out-of-Band Emissions (OOBE) Test Plan 1.0Introduction This test plan describes the planned narrowband unwanted out-of-band emissions testing of the Globalstar user terminal (UT) transmitter antenna ports. This testing will support verification that the UT meets the FCC emissions limitation requirements specified in 47 CFR Ch. 1 (10-1-97 Edition), Part 25, Sections 25.213 (b), and (per Report and Order FCC 98-338, adopted Dec. 17, 1998), Section 25.200 (c), and to provide data required for the UT Certification Reports as specified in Sections 2.983 and 2.991. The OOBE testing described herein consists of manual narrowband high-frequency conducted OOBE testing in the 1559 to 1610 MHz frequency band to show compliance with the Part 25 §25.200 (c) narrowband (700 Hz bandwidth) conducted antenna port emissions limits established to protect sensitive radionavigation equipment and systems operating in that band from interference. The testing is also intended to show compliance with the special Part 25 §25.213 (b) narrowband (600 Hz bandwidth) effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) emissions limit in the 1574.397 to 1576.443 MHz band for global positioning satellite (GPS) receiver protection, for the separately-measured out-of-band antenna gain values (5 dB max. in that band). 2.0Test Configuration, Test Point , and Mode of Operation The emissions shall be measured at the transmit coaxial antenna port connector inside the UT, using a UT with a special OOBE test antenna which provides external coaxial cable connector interfaces for the internal UT transmit and receive antenna ports, and providing a DC block for the latter to protect the Anritsu receiver from the DC bias voltage on the receive antenna low noise amplifier (LNA). The output signal shall be a real, full-power, full duty-cycle CDMA signal, transmitted by the UT; maintaining an RF link to an Anritsu tester while making the required OOBE measurements by means of coaxial cables, an RF power splitter, fixed-frequency bandstop filter, and a spectrum analyzer, as shown schematically in Figure 1. Tests shall be performed at full rated output power: 3 dBW output power (P t ) equivalent to a maximum rated effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) of 7 dBW for the fixed and mobile UT’s, and –4 dBW output power equivalent to 0 dBW EIRP for portable UT’s, with a maximum rated UT antenna gain of 4 dB. Tests shall be performed for the lowest UT channel, Channel 1 (center frequency 1610.730 MHz), that being the worst case for emissions into the radionavigation band. 3-3-99 GS UT NB OOBE Test Plan 2 of 7 A Channel 1 notch filter is employed because the spectrum analyzer does not have a preselector filter and hence lacks sufficient frequency discrimination to measure signals more than 80 dB down in the presence of the transmitter carrier a few MHz above the stop frequency. 3.0Emissions Test Limits Table 1 identifies the FCC Part 25 narrowband conducted and radiated OOBE limits applicable to the Globalstar UT’s in the 1559-1605 NHz band, measurement bandwidths, and bandwidth correction factors. Table 1. Globalstar UT FCC Narrowband Out-of-Band Emissions Limits The GPS band narrowband EIRP limit is -80 dBW, numerically the same power level as the overall radionavigation band conducted limit. Hence radionavigation band conducted measurements, showing compliance with the conduct radionavigation- band lmits less the maximum out-of-band antenna gain ( 5 dB), will be sufficient to show compliance with the GPS band EIRP limits. 4.0 Emissions Measurements Tests shall be performed in 4 parts. First the aggregate losses of the coaxial cables, splitter, Channel 1 notch filter, and 6 dB attenuator pads shall be measured from 1559 to 1605 MHz using a network analyzer, as shown in Figure 2, and the loss- corrected emissions limits determined. Then the cable and splitter losses at 1610.73 MHz, without the filter and attenuator pads, shall be measured. Then connecting the spectrum analyzer directly with the notch/bandstop filter and 6 dB attenuator removed as shown in Figure 1, the transmitter antenna port conducted in-band emissions shall be measured at 1610.73 MHz using a 1 MHz bandwidth, to verify that the UT is transmitting at its full rated power. Finally out-of-band emissions shall be measured with the spectrum analyzer using 1 kHz and then 300 Hz resolution bandwidths and those measurements shall be compared to the corrected emissions limits. Frequency Range (MHz) FCC Pt. 25 Limits (dBW) Narrowband Limit Bandwidth Spectrum Analyzer Meas.BW (Hz) Bandwidth Correction Factor (dB) BW-Corrected FCC Pt. 25 Limits (dBW) Conducted 1559-1610-80.0700.01000.01.5-78.5 300.0-3.7-83.7 Radiated (1) 1574.397-1576.443-85.0600.01000.02.2-82.8 300.0-3.0-88.0 (1) Equivalent Conducted Limit for 5 dB Out-of-Band Antenna Gain 3-3-99 GS UT NB OOBE Test Plan 3 of 7 Owing to spectrum analyzer limitations, direct measurements with 600 Hz and 700 Hz bandwidths is not possible; these resolution bandwidth values bracket the desired responses and have the smallest bandwidth correction values available for such narrowband measurements. For the conducted OOBE measurements the spectrum analyzer should be set such that the nominal conducted limit (-80 dBW) is not more than 20dB above, just at, or below the spectrum analyzer reference level. That coupled with the aggregate cable, splitter, and filter losses will prevent potential spatter and other test artifacts due to overdriving the front end of the spectrum analyzer . The spectrum analyzer start and stop frequencies and bandwidths to be employed are shown in Table 2, following. Table 2. Narrowband OOBE Test Frequency Bands 1 kHz Res. Bandwidth Measurements Start Frequency (MHz)Stop Frequency (MHZ) 15591590 15901605 300 Hz Res. Bandwidth Measurements Start Frequency (MHz)Stop Frequency (MHZ) 15591562 15621565 15651568 15681571 157115…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

8-23-99 1 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report Globalstar Digital Fixed User Terminal (DFUT) Antenna Port Narrowband Conducted Out-of-Band Emissions Test Report 1.0Introduction This test report documents the test results obtained by Qualcomm in measuring the Digital Fixed User Terminal out-of-band narrowband conducted emissions (1559- 1605 MHz) at the antenna port, per the preceding test plan. This report and the data it presents demonstrates compliance of the DFUT with the FCC Part 25 out-of-band emissions (OOBE) limits specified in 47 CFR Ch. 1 (10-1-98 Edition), Part 1, Section 25.213 (b), and (per Report and Order FCC 98-338, adopted 12-17-98) Section 25.200 (c). Sufficient margins were seen with respect to all CDMA signal out-of-band emissions in the radionavigation band (1559-1605 MHz) and the global positioning satellite (GPS) subband within that band (1574.397-1576.443 MHz) to demonstrate compliance with the applicable narrowband OOBE limits. 2.0Test Measurement Considerations Emissions were measured at the coaxial transmit output port of the UT antenna, using a modified UT antenna, short lengths of coaxial cable, RF power splitter/divider, and a step attenuator, as described in the Globalstar UT Antenna Port Conducted Narrowband Out-of-Band Emissions (OOBE) Test Plan. The correction factors for the test instrumentation and cable losses and the other test methodology correction factors described in the Test Plan were applied against the FCC out-of-band emissions limits to derive the measurement bandwidth dependent test limits to which the measured emissions were compared. 3.0Test Results Calibration measurement test results showing the combined test instrumentation and cable losses are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. Measurements of narrowband OOBE were performed using 2 bandwidths, 1 kHz and 300 Hz; the latter in successive 3 MHz frequency spans. Table 2 presents the loss-corrected conservative lower-bound OOBE test limits in each frequency band using the measured loss correction factors from Table 1. Plots of the measured antenna port OOBE are presented in Appendix A. Table 3 presents the calibration data for the test instruments employed. The OOBE test data for the lowest frequency channel, Channel 1 (center frequency 1610.73 MHz) shows only very low emissions, with greater than 15 dB margin with respect to the test limits at all frequencies from 1559 to 1605 MHz. 8-23-99 2 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report Table 1. Loss Calibration Measurement: Combined Splitter, Attenuators, Notch Filter and Cable Losses Figure 1. Network Analyzer S21 Plot of Combined Splitter, Attenuators, Filter , and Cable Losses (1559-1605 MHz). Insertion Loss FrequencyS21 (MHz)(dB) 1559-16.9 1562-16.9 1565-16.9 1568-16.8 1571-16.8 1574-16.8 1577-16.9 1580-16.9 1583-17.0 1586-17.1 1589-17.2 1592-17.4 1595-17.6 1598-18.0 1601-18.4 1604-18.8 1605-18.8 NB OOBE Test Cal Data -19 -18.5 -18 -17.5 -17 -16.5 1.550E+091.560E+091.570E+091.580E+091.590E+091.600E+091.610E+09 Frequency (Hz) S21 8-23-99 3 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report Table 2. Loss-Corrected FCC OOBE Emissions Test Limits [ Corrected Limit (dBm) = Norm. Limit (dBW) + BW Corr. Factor (dB) + Splitter, Attenuator and Additional Cable Losses Corr. Factor (dB) + 30 dB ] Table 4. OOBE Test Instrumentation Calibration Data Record Test InstrumentManuf. Model No. Serial No.Last CalCal Due Spectrum Analyzer (9 kHz – 6.5 GHz) HP 8595 E2287 K 36631 10-19-9810-19-99 Network Analyzer (30 kHz – 6 GHz) HP 8753 DK 720636-14-996-14-00 RF Power Splitter (0.5 – 18 GHz) Narda Model 4426- 2 02164N/AN/A Channel 1 Notch Filter Lorch Microwave 6CN-1610.73/X2- SM/SM 1221-17131- 1610 29971 S/N Y2 N/AN/A Globalstar UT TesterAnritsu MT 8803GK 73709N/AN/A Frequency Range (MHz) FCC Pt. 25 Limits (dBW) Spectrum Analyzer Meas.BW (Hz) Bandwidth Correction Factor (dB) Filter + Splitter+ Atten + Cable Loss Corr. Factor (dB) Corrected FCC Pt. 25 OOBE Meas. Limits (dBm) ConducteddBW/700 Hz 1559-1590-8010001.5 -16.9 to -17.3 -65.4 to -65.8 1590-1605-8010001.5 -17.3 to -18.8 -65.8 to -67.3 1559 - 1562-80300-3.7-16.9-70.6 1562 - 1565-80300-3.7-16.9-70.6 1565 - 1568-80300-3.7-16.8-70.5 1598 - 1571-80300-3.7-16.8-70.5 1571 - 1574-80300-3.7-16.8-70.5 1574 - 1577-80300-3.7-16.9-70.6 1577 - 1580-80300-3.7-16.9-70.6 1580 - 1583-80300-3.7-17.0-70.7 1583 - 1586-80300-3.7-17.1-70.8 1586 - 1589-80300-3.7-17.2-70.9 1589 - 1592-80300-3.7-17.4-71.1 1592 - 1595-80300-3.7-17.6-71.3 1595 - 1598-80300-3.7-18.0-71.7 1598 - 1601-80300-3.7-18.4-72.1 1601 - 1604-80300-3.7-18.8-72.5 1604 - 1605-80300-3.7-18.8-72.5 Radiated (1)dBW/600 Hz 1574.397-1576.443-8510002.2-16.9-69.7 1574.397-1576.443-85300-3.0-16.9-74.9 (1) Equivalent Conducted Limit for 5 dB Out-of-Band Antenna Gain 8-23-99 4 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report Appendix A. Narrowband OOBE Measurements Date/Time8/19/99 6:25:08 AM TitleG* DFUT Part 25 OOBE ReTest Job Number99061 Test NameCE 1559 MHz - 1605 MHz EUT NameDFUT EUT Model NumberGSP-2401 EUT Serial NumberRAU: N1069B99C, Deskset: N105W7KTF Analyzer Model NumberHP8595E Analyzer Serial Number2287 Site DescriptionUT TX Ch. 1, RX Ch. 7, Anritsu: ref sig 36 dBm, beam sig -38 dBm, S2001, 9600 bps. SA shows 30.23 dBm TX power, after correcting for 3.97 dB in-band loss. Operator NameSuzanne Galati 8-23-99 5 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 1 kHz Bandwidth: 8-23-99 6 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 300 Hz Bandwidth: 8-23-99 7 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 8-23-99 8 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 8-23-99 9 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 8-23-99 10 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 8-23-99 11 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 8-23-99 12 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report 8-23-99 13 of 13 GS DFUT FCC Part 25 OOBE Test Report

Qualcomm Proprietary: Restricted Distribution. (This document contains critical information about QUALCOMM products and may not be distributed to anyone that is not an employee of QUALCOMM without the approval of Configuration Management.) Globalstar Compliance Lab Reverse Link Test Procedures 80-98735-1 X1 QUALCOMM Incorporated 6455 Lusk Blvd. San Diego, CA, 92121-2779 U.S.A. Copyright © 1999 QUALCOMM Incorporated. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. All data and information contained in or disclosed by this document are confidential and proprietary information of QUALCOMM Incorporated and all rights therein are expressly reserved. By accepting this material the recipient agrees that this material and the information contained therein are held in confidence and in trust and will not be used, copied, reproduced in whole or in part, nor its contents revealed in any manner to others without the express written permission of QUALCOMM Incorporated. This technology is controlled by the United States Government. Diversion contrary to U.S. law prohibited. Qualcomm Proprietary: Restricted Distribution. (This document contains critical information about QUALCOMM products and may not be distributed to anyone that is not an employee of QUALCOMM without the approval of Configuration Management.) Globalstar TM is a trademark of Loral Qualcomm Satellite Services, Inc. Globalstar Compliance Lab Reverse Link Test Procedures 80-98735-1 X1 June 28, 1999 Globalstar Compliance Lab Reverse Link Test ProceduresTables 80-98735-1 X1QUALCOMM Proprietaryiii Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Scope of this Document.................................................................................1-1 1.2 List of Abbreviations/Acronyms ...................................................................1-1 2. Applicable Documents......................................................................................2-1 2.1 Document Requirements ..............................................................................2-1 3. Requirements ....................................................................................................3-1 3.1 General ..........................................................................................................3-1 4. Procedures ........................................................................................................4-1 4.1 General ..........................................................................................................4-1 4.1.1 Measurement Notes ................................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Calibration ...............................................................................................4-1 4.1.3 Test Sequences ........................................................................................4-1 4.2 Access Probe Power Time Response.............................................................4-2 4.2.1 Definition .................................................................................................4-2 4.2.2 Reference .................................................................................................4-2 4.2.3 Setup ........................................................................................................4-2 4.2.4 Measurement Method .............................................................................4-3 4.2.5 Criteria.....................................................................................................4-5 4.2.6 Test Report ..............................................................................................4-5 4.3 Access Channel Waveform Quality, Timing, and Frequency Accuracy......4-6 4.3.1 Definition .................................................................................................4-6 4.3.2 Reference .................................................................................................4-6 4.3.3 Setup ........................................................................................................4-6 4.3.4 Measurement Method .............................................................................4-6 4.3.5 Criteria:....................................................................................................4-6 4.3.6 Test Report ..............................................................................................4-7 4.4 Minimum Controlled Output Power ............................................................4-7 4.4.1 Definition .................................................................................................4-7 4.4.2 Reference .................................................................................................4-7 4.4.3 Setup ........................................................................................................4-7 4.4.4 Measurement Method .............................................................................4-7 IntroductionGlobalstar Compliance Lab Reverse Link Test Procedures ivQUALCOMM Proprietary80-98735-1 X1 4.4.5 Criteria .................................................................................................... 4-8 4.4.6 Test Report.............................................................................................. 4-8 4.5 Access Probe Output Power and Standby Output Power ........................... 4-8 4.5.1 Definition ................................................................................................ 4-8 4.5.2 Reference ................................................................................................. 4-8 4.5.3 Setup ....................................................................................................... 4-8 4.5.4 Measurement Method............................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Compliance Lab Test Report Company Name Qualcomm Inc. Donald Gosnell Product Name Fixed UT Model Number GSP-2401P Part Number 10-81055-2 Rev:X3/X1 Serial Number SN105W8LND Product Description TBR 41 Unit Unit Under Test: Testing Done by: Testers Name Company Name Department Name Qualcomm Inc. Comm Systems Test Engineering Compliance Lab Data Plot Index PlotNumberPlotTi…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.