O3JF2R802D1Wireless Point of Sale Terminal

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 9 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 User’s Manual 1 MIST Freedom II-D (DataTAC) User Manual 2 MIST Freedom II-D Copyright © 1999 MIST Inc. All Rights Reserved. MIST Part Number: DOC9-5.5 Manual Revision:1.1 Date of the document:November 1999 3 FCC compliance statement (USA) This device complies with the requirements in Part 15 of the FCC Rules for a Class B digital device. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: • This device may not cause harmful interference, and • This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation WARNING: Changes or modification to this unit not expressly approved by the party responsible for compliance could void the user’s authority to operate this equipment. Note: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits of a Class B digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interference will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by on or more of the following measures: *Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. *Increase the separation between the equipment and receiver. *Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. *Consult the dealer or an experienced radio/TV technician for help. 4 WARNING: To comply with FCC RF exposure requirements, this unit must be operated with a minimum separation distance of 40mm (1-5/8 inches) between its antenna and a person's body. The user's hand should not be placed directly next to the antenna or at locations on the unit where the antenna is connected, to ensure compliance with FCC RF exposure limits. Industry Canada Certification This device complies with Industry Canada RSS119. IC Class B compliance This device complies with the Class B limits for radio noise emissions as set out in the interference-causing equipment standard entitled “Digital Apparatus”, ICES-003 of Industry Canada 5 Important safety information Remember to follow any special regulations governing the use of the MIST FREEDOM II-D and always switch it off in areas where radio devices are forbidden, or when it may cause interference or danger. Any safety laws and regulations pertaining to the use of cell phones and two-way radios will likely apply to your use of the POS. We encourage you to follow such laws and regulations at all times. In particular, please observe all restrictions on the use of radio equipment in fuel depots (fuel storage and distribution areas), chemical plants, where blasting operations are in progress or in any other area in which restrictions on radio transmissions are imposed. The MIST FREEDOM II-D is not an FAA-approved electronic device for use on aircraft. Switch off the POS when in an aircraft. The effect of the use of the POS in an aircraft is unknown. Such use may affect aircraft instrumentation, communication and performance, may disrupt the network, and may be illegal. Operation of any radio transmitting equipment, including the POS, may interfere with the functionality of inadequately protected medical devices, including pacemakers. Consult a physician or the manufacturer of the medical device if you have any questions. Additionally, the effect of the radio signals from the POS on other electronic systems, including those in your car (such as electronic fuel-injection systems, electronic anti-skid braking systems, and electronic cruise-control systems) is unknown and malfunction of these systems may result. Avoid using the POS in any environment requiring your full attention, such as when driving a vehicle. Do not use any accessory that is not manufactured or supplied by MIST or an authorized MIST accessories supplier. Use of any accessory that is not supplied or approved for use by MIST is not 6 permitted. Use only those battery types specified in this User’s Guide. The use of any other may disable the POS and may be dangerous. Failure to observe all these instructions will void the Limited Warranty, and may lead to suspension or denial of services to the offender, or legal action, or both. 7 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................... 8 At a Glance ............................................................ 9 Know your POS Device ......................................... 11 Unpack your POS device package ............................ 12 Maintenance and Safety Information ......................... 13 Power Information ..................................................15 Connecting to the Serial Port ...................................18 Operating the Integrated Printer.................................19 Accessories ..........................................................21 8 Introduction Thank you for purchasing MIST FREEDOM II-D. We are confident that the MIST FREEDOM II-D you purchased will meet your exacting world-class quality standards. MIST FREEDOM II- D is a small, hand-held, wireless electronic transaction terminal that communicates with a remote host computer via the wireless network. MIST FREEDOM II allows several modem options for communicating to different network systems, such as CDPD, Mobitex, and DataTAC modem. MIST’s goal is to design and build POS (Point of Sales) devices wi…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 1 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Authorization letter Letter requesting Confidentiality

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 11 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Declaration of Conformity FCC Part 15

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 1 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Authorization letter Letter requesting Confidentiality

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 11 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Declaration of Conformity FCC Part 15

* Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 51 Spectrum Waytel: (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontariovisit our Web Pages: www.aprel.comfax: (613) 820-4161 Canada K2R 1E6email: [email protected] 26 October 2000 Mr. Errol Chang FCC Application Processing Branch Re:Question from the FCC FCC ID:O3JF2R802D1 Correspondence Reference Number:16077 731 Confirmation NumberEA98661 Date of Original E-Mail:9/13/2000 Dear Mr. Chang: Pursuant to your e-mail to MIST's Drazen Ivanovic, I am forwarding to you our responses to items 1 through 6. The relevant portions of the FCC’s e-mail follow with our response inserted in the appropriate place: > To:Drazen Ivanovic, MIST Inc. > From:Errol Chang, [email protected] > FCC Application Processing Branch > Re:FCC ID O3JF2R802D1 > Applicant:MIST Inc. > Correspondence Reference Number:16077 > 731 Confirmation Number:EA98661 > Date of Original E-Mail:9/13/2000 1. A number of exhibits uploaded for this filing contain cover pages that identify another product (Lipman)... . Mr. A. Brennan (of APREL Laboratories) noted this discrepancy soon after the filing was completed and informed your offices with the following message. Our records show the required exhibits as filed, as well as these incorrectly labeled. Please feel free to purge the incorrectly labeled exhibits from the application. -----Original Message----- From:Arthur Brennan Sent:September 7, 2000 2:45 PM To:'[email protected]' Cc:Jay Sarkar Subject:EA98661 FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 * Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 51 Spectrum Waytel: (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontariovisit our Web Pages: www.aprel.comfax: (613) 820-4161 Canada K2R 1E6email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Taube; I noticed that the adobe files for the application noted above (filed September 6, 2000) had the incorrect face pages over some of the correct exhibit documents. I have refilled exhibits 3,4,6,7,8,9 and 11 with the correct cover pages with the exhibit documents. I hope this is satisfactory. Sincerely Art Brennan APREL Laboratories 2. Filing is requesting for Part 22 approval. The operating frequency range for this product indicates it is a Part 90 device and is not applicable for Part 22 operations: please clarify and revise applicable filing info. The unit should be operating under FCC Part 90, not 22 as you have correctly pointed out but erroneously indicated in 731. It was a typographical error from our part. which shall be corrected. A corrected 731 is attached with this. The reports bear the appropriate FCC Part Nos. (90). > > 3. Please confirm that only the 25% duty factor version of this > device is applicable for this filing; therefore, earlier info and > results submitted based the 100% version of this product will be > ignored as necessary. Only the 25% duty factor of the device will be put into production. When this device was originally received for testing it incorporated a RIM R802D-2-O modem with firmware allowing it to transmit at 100%. All modems provided to developers last year and early this year were so configured. As of this spring RIM is installing firmware to restrict the duty factor of all modems to 25%. This device was subsequently retested at a duty factor of 25% for the worst case determined with a 100% duty factor. > 4. Table in Section 6.2(4) of the SAR report indicates a number of SAR test configurations, please provide illustrations to distinguish the difference between "keyboard up" and "top side up" configurations. The following two figures illustrate these two positions. The "Keyboard Up" scans were performed with the device's keyboard place against the bottom of the phantom (Figure 1). * Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 51 Spectrum Waytel: (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontariovisit our Web Pages: www.aprel.comfax: (613) 820-4161 Canada K2R 1E6email: [email protected] Figure 1 Keyboard Up with antenna outFigure 2 Top Side Up with antenna in The “Top Side Up” scan was performed with the top of the point of sale device against the bottom of the phantom with the antenna in. This scan was performed to check on the SAR in the direction of a bystander in front of the user. > 5. Please provide the rational for using the SAR test configurations indicated in 6.2(4). It is not clear if the antenna IN SAR for other configurations that have not been tested at mid-band are always lower; different antenna position and device operating position could have substantially different SAR distributions due to different test configurations, which could also depend on the design of the device. The criteria for selecting test configurations for low and high channel should also be clarified. Our normal procedure is as follows: 1. Area scans for all surfaces that the user or bystander can be exposed to, with the device on one of the H, M or L channels (usually M) and with the antenna IN and OUT if it is not fixed. 2. The worst surface is then explored with area scans for the other two channels. 3. Any other surface within 20% of the worst surface is also explored with area scans. 4. The worst surface for user exposure is then explored in detail with zoom and depth scans to determine the maximum 10 gram average SAR for a handheld device. If the worst case bystander exposure is from the same surface then this data will also produce the maximum 1g average SAR. 5. If the worst case bystander exposure is from a different surface then it is explored with zoom and depths scans to determine the maximum 1gram average SAR. In the case of this particular device we skipped a few area scans with the antenna IN because of our previous experience with two other versions of this product, namely a Mobitex and a CDPD implementation, where all the antenna IN scans had a peak SAR lower than the antenna OUT scans with the single exception of the “Top Side Up” scans (the table you reference actually has an error in it – for the High channel the 11.47 W/kg value should be on Antenna Keyboard * …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

* Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 51 Spectrum Waytel: (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontariovisit our Web Pages: www.aprel.comfax: (613) 820-4161 Canada K2R 1E6email: [email protected] 26 October 2000 Mr. Errol Chang FCC Application Processing Branch Re:Question from the FCC FCC ID:O3JF2R802D1 Correspondence Reference Number:16077 731 Confirmation NumberEA98661 Date of Original E-Mail:9/13/2000 Dear Mr. Chang: Pursuant to your e-mail to MIST's Drazen Ivanovic, I am forwarding to you our responses to items 1 through 6. The relevant portions of the FCC’s e-mail follow with our response inserted in the appropriate place: > To:Drazen Ivanovic, MIST Inc. > From:Errol Chang, [email protected] > FCC Application Processing Branch > Re:FCC ID O3JF2R802D1 > Applicant:MIST Inc. > Correspondence Reference Number:16077 > 731 Confirmation Number:EA98661 > Date of Original E-Mail:9/13/2000 1. A number of exhibits uploaded for this filing contain cover pages that identify another product (Lipman)... . Mr. A. Brennan (of APREL Laboratories) noted this discrepancy soon after the filing was completed and informed your offices with the following message. Our records show the required exhibits as filed, as well as these incorrectly labeled. Please feel free to purge the incorrectly labeled exhibits from the application. -----Original Message----- From:Arthur Brennan Sent:September 7, 2000 2:45 PM To:'[email protected]' Cc:Jay Sarkar Subject:EA98661 FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 * Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 51 Spectrum Waytel: (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontariovisit our Web Pages: www.aprel.comfax: (613) 820-4161 Canada K2R 1E6email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Taube; I noticed that the adobe files for the application noted above (filed September 6, 2000) had the incorrect face pages over some of the correct exhibit documents. I have refilled exhibits 3,4,6,7,8,9 and 11 with the correct cover pages with the exhibit documents. I hope this is satisfactory. Sincerely Art Brennan APREL Laboratories 2. Filing is requesting for Part 22 approval. The operating frequency range for this product indicates it is a Part 90 device and is not applicable for Part 22 operations: please clarify and revise applicable filing info. The unit should be operating under FCC Part 90, not 22 as you have correctly pointed out but erroneously indicated in 731. It was a typographical error from our part. which shall be corrected. A corrected 731 is attached with this. The reports bear the appropriate FCC Part Nos. (90). > > 3. Please confirm that only the 25% duty factor version of this > device is applicable for this filing; therefore, earlier info and > results submitted based the 100% version of this product will be > ignored as necessary. Only the 25% duty factor of the device will be put into production. When this device was originally received for testing it incorporated a RIM R802D-2-O modem with firmware allowing it to transmit at 100%. All modems provided to developers last year and early this year were so configured. As of this spring RIM is installing firmware to restrict the duty factor of all modems to 25%. This device was subsequently retested at a duty factor of 25% for the worst case determined with a 100% duty factor. > 4. Table in Section 6.2(4) of the SAR report indicates a number of SAR test configurations, please provide illustrations to distinguish the difference between "keyboard up" and "top side up" configurations. The following two figures illustrate these two positions. The "Keyboard Up" scans were performed with the device's keyboard place against the bottom of the phantom (Figure 1). * Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 51 Spectrum Waytel: (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontariovisit our Web Pages: www.aprel.comfax: (613) 820-4161 Canada K2R 1E6email: [email protected] Figure 1 Keyboard Up with antenna outFigure 2 Top Side Up with antenna in The “Top Side Up” scan was performed with the top of the point of sale device against the bottom of the phantom with the antenna in. This scan was performed to check on the SAR in the direction of a bystander in front of the user. > 5. Please provide the rational for using the SAR test configurations indicated in 6.2(4). It is not clear if the antenna IN SAR for other configurations that have not been tested at mid-band are always lower; different antenna position and device operating position could have substantially different SAR distributions due to different test configurations, which could also depend on the design of the device. The criteria for selecting test configurations for low and high channel should also be clarified. Our normal procedure is as follows: 1. Area scans for all surfaces that the user or bystander can be exposed to, with the device on one of the H, M or L channels (usually M) and with the antenna IN and OUT if it is not fixed. 2. The worst surface is then explored with area scans for the other two channels. 3. Any other surface within 20% of the worst surface is also explored with area scans. 4. The worst surface for user exposure is then explored in detail with zoom and depth scans to determine the maximum 10 gram average SAR for a handheld device. If the worst case bystander exposure is from the same surface then this data will also produce the maximum 1g average SAR. 5. If the worst case bystander exposure is from a different surface then it is explored with zoom and depths scans to determine the maximum 1gram average SAR. In the case of this particular device we skipped a few area scans with the antenna IN because of our previous experience with two other versions of this product, namely a Mobitex and a CDPD implementation, where all the antenna IN scans had a peak SAR lower than the antenna OUT scans with the single exception of the “Top Side Up” scans (the table you reference actually has an error in it – for the High channel the 11.47 W/kg value should be on Antenna Keyboard * …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Table of Contents Wireless Point of Sale Terminal Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 MIST Inc. C C O O V V E E R R L L E E T T T T E E R R Exhibit 1: Authorization Letter and, Request for confidentiality Letter from Research in Motion authorizing to use DataTAC Modem in the Freeedom II-D. Exhibit 2:Engineering Reports (ERP and Spurious)Includes Test Set- up Photographs Exhibit 3: Technical Descriptions and Tune-up Procedure Exhibit 4: FCC ID Label Exhibit 5:Photographs of the Equipment Internal and External Exhibit 6: Block Diagram (Confidential) Exhibit 7: Schematic Diagram (Confidential) Exhibit 8:Parts List (Confidential) Exhibit 9:User’s Manual Exhibit 10:SAR Report (Includes Test Set-up Photographs) Exhibit 11: FCC Part 15, subpart B, DoC letter

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 5 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Photographs of the Equipment Internal External June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: Open June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: Rear of display and keyboard June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: rear of display June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: Rear of keyboard June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Top half June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Modem June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Bottom third of Transmitter board Connector June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Battery and compartment

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 4 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 FCC ID Label

June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Exhibit 5 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem MIST Inc. FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Photographs of the Equipment Internal External June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: Open June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: Rear of display and keyboard June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: rear of display June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: Rear of keyboard June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion RIM802D Transmitter DataTAC Modem: June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Top half June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Modem June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Bottom third of Transmitter board Connector June 2000 APREL Project No.: MISB-FREEDOM-II-DATATAC FCC ID: O3JF2R802D1 Consulting * Research * Training * Certification Testing Since 1981 Battery and compartment

Certification Report on Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Experimental Analysis MIST Inc. Freedom II-D Test Date: 28 April & 11 August, 2000 51 Spectrum Way Nepean ON K2R 1E6 Tel: (613) 820-2730 Fax: (613) 820-4161 email: [email protected] This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the express written permission of APREL Laboratories MISB-Freedom II DataTAC-3419 Page 2 of 26Project #: MISB-Freedom II DataTAC-3419 51 Spectrum WayTel. (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontario, K2R 1E6Fax (613) 820 4161 e-mail: [email protected] © APREL 2000 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories. FCC ID:03JF2R802D1 Applicant:MIST Inc. Equipment:Point of Sale Device Model:Freedom II-D with a Research in Motion R802D-2-0 Radio Modem Standard:FCC 96 –326, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radio- Frequency Radiation ENGINEERING SUMMARY This report contains the results of the engineering evaluation performed on a MIST Freedom II-D Point of Sale device (POS) operating with a built in Research in R802D-2-0 radio modem (Ardis/DataTAC network). The POS is intended to transmit while being operated from the user’s hand. The measurements were carried out in accordance with FCC 96-326. The POS was evaluated at its maximum nominal power level. The Freedom II-D was tested at high, middle, and low frequencies on the keyboard, battery, (L) antenna, right side and the top edge of the device, with the antenna extended and retracted. The maximum 10 g SAR (1.31 W/kg) coinciding with the peak performance RF output power of channel 2000 h (low, 806 MHz) for the keyboard up position with the antenna extended and the duty factor limited to 25%. Test data and graphs are presented in this report. At a separation distance of 4 cm from the device, the maximum 1 g SAR is 0.23 W/kg. The user manual will have a warning to keep bystanders, and parts of the user’s body other than their hands, at least 4cm away from the device. Based on the test results and on how the device will be used, it is certified that the product meets the requirements as set forth in the above specifications, for an uncontrolled RF exposure environment. (The results presented in this report relate only to the sample tested.) Page 3 of 26Project #: MISB-Freedom II DataTAC-3419 51 Spectrum WayTel. (613) 820-2730 Nepean, Ontario, K2R 1E6Fax (613) 820 4161 e-mail: [email protected] © APREL 2000 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,without the express written approval of APREL Laboratories. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2.Applicable Documents.......................................................................................................4 3.Equipment Under Test.......................................................................................................4 4.Test Equipment..................................................................................................................5 5.Test Methodology..............................................................................................................5 6.Test Results........................................................................................................................6 6.1.Transmitter Characteristics........................................................................................6 6.2.SAR Measurements....................................................................................................7 7.Analysis..............................................................................................................................9 8.Bystander..........................................................................................................................10 8.1.100% Firmware Modem...........................................................................................10 8.2.25% Firmware Modem.............................................................................................11 9.Conclusions......................................................................................................................12 Appendix A..............................................................................................................................13 Appendix B..............................................................................................................................20 Appendix C..............................................................................................................................21 Appendix D..............................................................................................................................22 Appendix E...............................................................................................................................25 Appendix F..................................................................................................................…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.