OU4-XHA750Home Away Security Module

Exhibit J User Manual Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 HOME/AWAY MODULE FAQ’S /// HOW FAR AWAY CAN THE HOME/AWAY MODULE BE PLACED FROM THE MOTOROLA GATEWAY? Typically 60 feet. CAN I PLACE THE HOME/AWAY MODULE IN A DIFFERENT ROOM FROM THE MOTOROLA GATEWAY? Yes, the Home/Away Module uses radio frequencies to communicate with the Motorola Gateway. These frequencies can travel through objects such as walls, ceilings, and floors. HOW MANY HOME/AWAY MODULES CAN I USE WITH MY MOTOROLA GATEWAY? The Motorola Gateway can support up to 20 sensors. TECHNICAL SPECS /// n Attaches to vertical flat surfaces (antenna must point up) n Operates using power module n LED indicator when sensor is triggered n Test/Discover button Typical Range Outdoors: 250 feet Typical Range Indoors: 60 feet Frequency Range: 418 MHz APPROVALS /// FCC ID NUMBER: OU4-XHA750 / IC: 4576A-XHA750 STANDARDS 93/68/EEC, 89/336/EEC, BS EN 50082-1:1992, 73/23/EEC, EN60950:1992 CE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE USER: The user is cautioned that changes and modifications made to the equipment without the approval of manufacturer could void the user's authority to operate this equipment. This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a class B digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a residential installation. This equipment generates, uses and can radiate radio frequency energy and if not installed and used in accordance with the instructions, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. However, there is no guarantee that interferences will not occur in a particular installation. If this equipment does cause harmful interference to radio or television reception, which can be determined by turning the equipment off and on, the user is encouraged to try to correct the interference by one or more of the following measures: • Reorient or relocate the receiving antenna. • Increase the separation between the equipment and receiver. • Connect the equipment into an outlet on a circuit different from that to which the receiver is connected. • Consult the dealer or an experienced radio/TV technician for help. CE directive 93/68/EEC, EMC directive 89/336/EEC, LV directive 73/23/EEC. This class B digital apparatus complies with Canadian ICES-003. The term “IC:” before the certification/registration number only signifies that the Industry Canada technical specifications were met. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference, including interference that may cause undesired operation of the device. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION /// The HomeGenie ™ Home/Away Module enables a user to conveniently arm/disarm their system when leaving/entering their home. PACKAGE CONTENTS /// n (1) HomeGenie ™ Home/Away Module n (1) Key Fob n (1) 9V Power Adapter n (1) Wall Mounting Kit INSTALLATION /// The HomeGenie ™ Home/Away Module should be mounted indoors, at a height of 5 - 6 feet, near where you will be entering or leaving your home. HELPFUL HINTS /// The HomeGenie ™ Home/Away Module is suitable for indoor use only. n The Home/Away Module cannot be mounted on metal doors, metal doorframes or other metal objects. 2I WALL MOUNTING KIT 9V POWER ADAPTER HOMEGENIE HOME/AWAY MODULEKEY FOB

1601 FM 1460, Suite B Round Rock, TX 78664 e-mail: [email protected] 512/244-3371 Fax: (512)244-1846 April 29, 2005 FCC ID: OU4-XHA750 IC Number: 4576A-XHA750 In response to your comments regarding the application for certification of the devices referenced above please find our response below: 1) The FCC label should still include the 2 part FCC statement: A picture has been taken with a ruler next to the device. The picture was added to the external photos exhibit. 2) It appears that the timing plots provided are for the 19 msec keep alive packet. However, how about the normal Arm/Disarm transations. Please provide a plot over 1- 2 seconds showing these transactions. Additionally, it can not be adequately determined how many packets get sent over a 100 msec period of time for purposes of averaging. A cover letter has been written describing the architecture of their packet transmissions. It will be uploaded as a cover letter on the manufacturers letterhead. 3) Please explain the nature/theory of operation of the electronic key. Is this device RF or inductive in nature? Is it wireless, even if only a few cm? Note that either RF or inductive may require testing and approval as a RF TX if this is a wireless interface of RF or inductive nature. Please provide further information as necessary such as theory or schematics of electric eye as necessary. The electronic key is an iButton by maxim-ic. It is not RF in nature and must make contact. It employs a 1-wire serial interface.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 March 30, 2005 RE: Xanboo/Core Technologies FCC ID: OU4-XHA750 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) Please provide top and bottom photographs of the RF board by itself and a photograph of the main board with the RF module removed. 2) Proper FCC label consists of the term “FCC ID:”, not “FCC ID Number:”. Please correct. 3) Please justify the use of the DoC labeling information (FCC Logo and associated text). This labeling is reserved for particular approvals that do not appear to apply to this application (PC Peripheral, Stand alone RX, etc.). Please justify or correct the labeling. 4) User manual states 418 – 433 MHz, while the application cites 418 MHz only. Please explain. 5) Please explain the nature/theory of operation of the electronic key. Is this device RF or inductive in nature? Is it wireless, even if only a few cm? Note that either RF or inductive may require testing and approval as a RF TX if this is a wireless interface of RF or inductive nature. Please provide further information as necessary such as theory or schematics of electric eye as necessary. 6) This device appear to normally be mounted upright. Was it also tested in this position? Note that the antenna appears significantly longer than the external element alone and positioning of the unit and element in this position could have an effect. 7) The description of the device in the report tends to contradict the expected use of the device. It appears that this device arms/disarms a security system and does not actually lock or unlock a door. 8) It appears that the fundamental and 836 MHz harmonic may have been taken using a QP detector. Please note that this is only allowed if the repetition rate exceeds 20 Hz. Additionally, please note that you are not allowed to correct QP reading to make average readings. The FCC rules allow the use of Peak and Average, or QP alone. If QP measurements are made, they must be compared against the average limit alone. If these are QP measurements, please note that they exceed the average limit. Please review and correct as necessary. 9) It appears that 15.231(e) was selected for limits for this device. It is uncertain why this was necessary. Please explain. However, please note that compliance to 15.231 (a) must show compliance to the 5 second requirements for manual or automatic Transmissions, with exception of the keep alive transmissions since this device is used in security applications.. 10) Measurements > 1 GHz state they are performed at 1 meter, but there does not appear to be any distance correction. Please explain and/or correct as necessary. 11) Please provide a plot showing the period between transmissions. It can not adequately be determined if any other transmissions occur during 100 msec from the plots provided and this needs to be verified to support the average correction factor. z Page 2 March 31, 2005 Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 April 29, 2005 RE: Xanboo/Core Technologies FCC ID: OU4-XHA750 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The FCC label should still include the 2 part FCC statement: Operation is subject to the following two conditions: 1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and 2) This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. 2) It appears that the timing plots provided are for the 19 msec keep alive packet. However, how about the normal Arm/Disarm transations. Please provide a plot over 1-2 seconds showing these transactions. Additionally, it can not be adequately determined how many packets get sent over a 100 msec period of time for purposes of averaging. 3) Please explain the nature/theory of operation of the electronic key. Is this device RF or inductive in nature? Is it wireless, even if only a few cm? Note that either RF or inductive may require testing and approval as a RF TX if this is a wireless interface of RF or inductive nature. Please provide further information as necessary such as theory or schematics of electric eye as necessary. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

American Telecommunications Certification Body Inc. 6731 Whittier Ave, McLean, VA 22101 April 29, 2005 RE: Xanboo/Core Technologies FCC ID: OU4-XHA750 After a review of the submitted information, I have a few comments on the above referenced Application. 1) The cover letter mentions that a nominal data packet is 19.5 ms. It also mentions that an additional 5 msec may be added for encrypted PIN number for this device. The data only shows 18.5 msec. Additionally, please note that his may affect average results reported and should be corrected as well. It appears that the worse case average margin currently reported is 2.0 dB, while the difference due to duty cycle would be slightly more than this. Please review, provide worse case timing measurements, and correct the report as necessary. Timothy R. Johnson Examining Engineer mailto: [email protected] The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information may result in application termination. Correspondence should be considered part of the permanent submission and may be viewed from the Internet after a Grant of Equipment Authorization is issued. Please do not respond to this correspondence using the email reply button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must submit your documents through the AmericanTCB.com website. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to the sender.

Exhibit I Letter of Authorization Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 Ref: FCC ID# OU4-XHA750 November 19, 2004 American Telecommunications Certification Body, Inc. 6731 Whittier Avenue Suite C110 McLean, VA 22101 Letter of Authorization To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that Xanboo Inc, 1626 Vineyard Rd, Grand Prairie, TX 75052-1405, authorizes Professional testing to act on our behalf, until otherwise notified, for applications submitted to American Telecommunications Certification Body, Inc.(ATCB). We certify that we are not subject to denial of federal benefits, that includes FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, U.S.C. 862. Further, no party as defined in 47 CFR 1.2002(b), to the application is subject to denial of federal benefits that includes FCC benefits. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Kent Britain Sr. RF Engineer Xanboo Inc Core Technology An Industry Leader in Home Security Wireless Applications Letter of Authorization and Anti-Drug Date: Novmber 19, 2004 Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, Maryland 21046 Dear Sir/Madam: This is a letter of authorization to accept Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. as an agent for (Core Technology, 115 W. 30 th st, New York, NY 10001), for a period of one year, to sign applications before the Commission on our behalf, to make representations to you on our behalf, and to receive and exchange data between our company and the Commission with respect to the following Core Technology products: Product: Xanboo OU4-XHA750 Please also accept this letter as an attestation that neither Core Technology nor any of its officers, directors, or persons holding more that 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares, voting or non-voting, have been denied federal benefits under section 5301 of the Anti-Drug-Abuse act of 1988,21 U.S.C. 853(a). In addition, Core Technology will notify the Federal Communications Commission if, at any time, the situation changes causing Core Technology to be denied federal benefits. If you have any further questions or need additional information, please feel free to give me a call at phone. Sincerely, Kent Britain Sr. RF Engineer Core Technology 972-849-0235

Exhibit K Letter of Confidentiality Xanboo/Core Technologies XRT750 January 6, 2005 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 U.S.A. Subject: Request for withholding from public disclosure the schematic diagram and system block diagram pursuant to an application for certification. Applicant: Xanboo Inc. 115 West 30 th Street New York, New York 10001 Product: XRT750 FCC ID: OU4-XRT750 Dear Sir/Madam, We, Xanboo/Core Technologies, request that the schematic diagram and system block diagram submitted with application for certification for FCC ID: OU4-XRT750 be withheld from public disclosure as per Section 0.459 of FCC Rules. This request is made under the provisions of Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's Rules, and Section 552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act. These sections authorize as a withholding from public inspection, material which would be privileged as a matter of law if retained by the person submitting them, and material which would not customarily be released to the public by that person. The detailed confidential materials are listed as follows: Exhibit F Block Diagram.pdf Exhibit G Schematics.pdf If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact us by Phone or EMail. Yours truly, Kent Britain Sr. RF Engineer [email protected] 972.660.2810

1601 FM 1460, Suite B Round Rock, TX 78664 e-mail: [email protected] 512/244-3371 Fax: (512)244-1846 May 4, 2005 FCC ID: OU4-XHA750 IC Number: 4576A-XHA750 In response to your comments regarding the application for certification of the devices referenced above please find our response below: 1) The cover letter mentions that a nominal data packet is 19.5 ms. It also mentions that an additional 5 msec may be added for encrypted PIN number for this device. The data only shows 18.5 msec. Additionally, please note that his may affect average results reported and should be corrected as well. It appears that the worse case average margin currently reported is 2.0 dB, while the difference due to duty cycle would be slightly more than this. Please review, provide worse case timing measurements, and correct the report as necessary. There are two types of packets, automatic system integrity packets and manual key fob access requests. The manual access request is 23.3 mS long, and the space between manual packet transmission is about 1 second because a button needs to be pushed after using the key fob. The averaging factor in the report has been changed to reflect the increase to 23.3 mS. A statement from Xanboo is included.

Exhibit E2 External Photos Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 XRT750 Back XRT750 Front

Exhibit E2 External Photos Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 XRT750 Back XRT750 Front Size

Exhibit C Label Location Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 XANBOO ACCESS CONTROL MODULE MODEL XHA750 FCC ID: OU4-XHA750 IC:4576A-XHA750 Xanboo Inc. New York USA Made in China

Exhibit E1 Internal Photos Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 PCB Back PCB Front

Exhibit H Description of Operation Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 The user inserts an electronic key that uniquely identifies him. The user then selects arming or unarming of the security system. By its nature, this product is unlikely to be used more than twice a day. The Home and Away unit sends a “Keep Live” 19 ms packet every 15 minutes. A ten second watchdog timer starts at each activation to prevent multiple transmissions even during multiple activations.

Exhibit B Test Report Xanboo/Core Technologies Home and Away XHA750 Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Project 05229-10 Page 1 of 17 Project Number: 05229-10 Prepared for: Xanboo/Core Technologies 115 West 30th Street New York, NY 10001 By Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. 1601 FM 1460, Suite B Round Rock, Texas 78664 April 2005 CERTIFICATION Electromagnetic Interference Test Report Xanboo/Core Technologies Home and Away XHA750 Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Project 05229-10 Page 2 of 17 Table of Contents Title Page .........................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................2 Certificate of Compliance ................................................................................................................3 1.0 EUT Description ..................................................................................................................4 1.1 Applicable Documents.....................................................................................................4 1.2 EUT Operation.................................................................................................................4 2.0 Electromagnetic Emissions Testing.....................................................................................4 2.1 Conducted Emissions Measurements ..............................................................................4 2.1.1 Test Procedure .........................................................................................................5 2.1.2 Test Criteria .............................................................................................................5 2.1.3 Test Results ..............................................................................................................5 2.2 Radiated Emissions Measurements .................................................................................5 2.2.1 Test Procedure .........................................................................................................6 2.2.2 Test Criteria .............................................................................................................6 2.2.3 Test Results ..............................................................................................................7 3.0 Occupied Bandwidth Measurements ...................................................................................7 3.1 Test Procedure .................................................................................................................7 3.2 Test Criteria .....................................................................................................................7 3.3 Test Results ......................................................................................................................7 4.0 Antenna Requirement ..........................................................................................................8 4.1 Evaluation Procedure .......................................................................................................8 4.2 Evaluation Criteria ...........................................................................................................8 4.3 Evaluation Results ...........................................................................................................8 5.0 Modifications to Equipment ................................................................................................8 6.0 List of Test Equipment.........................................................................................................8 FIGURES Figure 1 Conducted Emissions Test Setup ....................................................................................10 Figure 2 Radiated Emissions Test Setup .......................................................................................11 APPENDICES Appendix A Emissions Data ..........................................................................................................12 THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL TESTING (EMI), INC. Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Project 05229-10 Page 3 of 17 Applicant: Xanboo/Core Technologies Applicant’s Address: 115 West 30th Street New York, NY 10001 FCC ID: OU4-XHA750 IC Number: 4576A-XHA750 Project Number: 05229-10 Test Dates: October 20-21, 2004 April 27, 2005 I, Michael A. Royer, for Professional Testing (EMI), Inc., being familiar with the FCC and IC rules and test procedures have reviewed the test setup, measured data and this report. I believe them to be true and accurate. The Xanboo/Core Technologies, Home and Away XHA750 was tested to and found to be in compliance with FCC Part 15 Subpart C and RSS 210 6.1.1 for an Intentional Radiator. The highest emissions generated by the above equipment are listed below: Frequency (MHz) Level (dBμV/m) Limit (dBμV/m) Margin (dB) Fundamental 418 (peak) 84.1 92.3 -8.2 418 (avg) 70.3 72.3 -2.0 Spurious 836 48.8 52.3 -3.5 Conducted 0.325 47.8 59.6 -11.8 Occupied Bandwidth 189 (kHz) Michael A. Royer, BSEE, NCE EMC Department Manager This report has been reviewed and accepted by Xanboo/Core Technologies. The undersigned is responsible for ensuring that Xanboo/Core Technologies, Home and Away XHA750 will continue to comply with the FCC and IC rules. Certificate Of Compliance Professional Testing (EMI), Inc. Project 05229-10 Page 4 of 17 1.0 EUT Description The user inserts an electronic key that uniquely identifies him. The user then selects arming or unarming of the security system. By its nature, this product is unlikely to be used more than twice a day. The Home and Away unit sends a “Keep Live” 19 ms packet every 15 minutes. A ten second watchdog timer starts at each activation to prevent multi…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

BE THERE /// EVEN WHEN YOU’RE NOT 115 W 30TH ST. NEW YORK, NY 10001 P: 212.714.2295 /// F: 212.714.2491 /// www.xanboo.com To: Professional Testing Inc: Attn: Mike Royer Date: May 4, 2005 Subject: Xanboo Duty Cycle FCC ID OU4-XHA750 The XHA750 sends out a 20.5 millisecond system integrity packet every 15 minutes. Maximum Duty Cycle (20.5 x 4) or 82 milliseconds per hour. When manually arming or disarming the Xanboo security system, the packet encludes the encrypted PIN number of the user. This packet is a maximum 5 Bytes longer, making a worse case packet length of 23.3 milliseconds. Please let me know if I can help you with anyother questions. Kent Britain Sr. RF Engineer Xanboo Inc. 972.660.2810 Lab 972.606.1909 Fax 972.849.0235 Cell [email protected]

Exhibit D Test Setup Photos Xanboo/Core Technologies XHA750 Conducted Emissions - Side Conducted Emissions – Front Radiated Emissions – Front Radiated Emissions - Side