P7RRFTM418Remote Control

1 Scott McCutchan To: [email protected] Subject: FCC ID: P7RRFTM418 Mr. Fujimoto, In order for processing of this application (FCC ID: P7RRFTM418) to continue, the following issue(s) will have to be addressed: 1) Please provide a picture or diagram showing where the FCC label will be placed on the device. 2) The expository statement mentions that the device has "24 channels". Please verify that this does not mean that the device can operate on multiple frequencies. 3) Please indicate how this device complies with the operational limitations contained in FCC Part 15, Section 15.231(a). The item(s) indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 60 days of the original e-mail date may result in application dismissal and forfeiture of the filing fee. Also, please note that partial responses increase processing time and should not be submitted. Any questions about the content of this correspondence should be directed to [email protected]. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Best regards, Scott McCutchan Operations Manager Compatible Electronics TCB (714) 579-1489 fax (714) 579-1850 http://www.celectronics.com Correspondence by Project Project Number: 1033242277 Correspondence Number Memo P7RRFTM418-1 1) Please provide a picture of diagram where the FCC label will be placed on the device. RESPONSE: Please see the FCC-ID Label in the uploaded attachments 2) The expository statement mentions that the device has “24 channels”. Please verify that this does not mean that the device can operate on multiple frequencies. RESPONSE: The “24 channels” are based on the fact the transmitter was connected to a keypad that has 28 different buttons – 24 of those buttons are for each of the 24 channels that send out a different recognition code so that the receiver knows what channel to operate. All of the channels would be at 418 MHz. 3) Please indicate how this device complies with the operational limitations contained in FCC Part 15, Section 15.231(a). RESPONSE: The unit stops transmitting as soon as one of the keys on the keypad is released. The unit is used as a remote control. That is it controls different types of motors (i.e. telling them when to start and stop).

Report Number: B20917A1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM 114 OLINDA DRIVE, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 PHONE: (714) 579-0500 FAX: (714) 579-1850 Page 1 of 15 FCC PART 15, SUBPART B and C TEST REPORT for REMOTE CONTROL MODEL: K24A-PRF+RFTM Prepared for ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC. 11811 UPHAM STREET, UNIT #2 BROOMFIELD, COLORADO 80020 Prepared by:_____________________ KYLE FUJIMOTO Approved by:____________________ MICHAEL CHRISTENSEN COMPATIBLE ELECTRONICS INC. 114 OLINDA DRIVE BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 (714) 579-0500 DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 REPORT APPENDICES TOTAL BODY A B C D E PAGES 16 2 2 2 10 10 42 This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compatible Electronics. Report Number: B20917A1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM 114 OLINDA DRIVE, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 PHONE: (714) 579-0500 FAX: (714) 579-1850 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section / Title PAGE GENERAL REPORT SUMMARY 4 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 4 1. PURPOSE 5 2. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 6 2.1 Location of Testing 6 2.2 Traceability Statement 6 2.3 Cognizant Personnel 6 2.4 Date Test Sample was Received 6 2.5 Disposition of the Test Sample 6 2.6 Abbreviations and Acronyms 6 3. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 7 4. Description of Test Configuration 8 4.1 Description of Test Configuration - EMI 8 4.1.1 Cable Construction and Termination 9 5. LISTS OF EUT, ACCESSORIES AND TEST EQUIPMENT 10 5.1 EUT and Accessory List 10 5.2 EMI Test Equipment 11 6. TEST SITE DESCRIPTION 12 6.1 Test Facility Description 12 6.2 EUT Mounting, Bonding and Grounding 12 7. Test Procedures 13 7.1 Radiated Emissions (Spurious and Harmonics) Test 13 7.2 Bandwidth of the Fundamental 15 8. CONCLUSIONS 16 Report Number: B20917A1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM 114 OLINDA DRIVE, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 PHONE: (714) 579-0500 FAX: (714) 579-1850 Page 3 of 16 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX TITLE A Laboratory Recognitions B Modifications to the EUT C Additional Models Covered Under This Report D Diagrams, Charts, and Photos • Test Setup Diagrams • Radiated Emissions Photos • Antenna and Effective Gain Factors E Data Sheets LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE 1 Plot Map And Layout of Test Site Report Number: B20917A1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM 114 OLINDA DRIVE, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 PHONE: (714) 579-0500 FAX: (714) 579-1850 Page 4 of 16 GENERAL REPORT SUMMARY This electromagnetic emission test report is generated by Compatible Electronics Inc., which is an independent testing and consulting firm. The test report is based on testing performed by Compatible Electronics personnel according to the measurement procedures described in the test specifications given below and in the "Test Procedures" section of this report. The measurement data and conclusions appearing herein relate only to the sample tested and this report may not be reproduced without the written permission of Compatible Electronics, unless done so in full. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Device Tested: Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM S/N: N/A Product Description: See Expository Statement. Modifications: The EUT was modified during the testing. Please see the list located in Appendix B. Manufacturer: Electronic Solutions, Inc. 11811 Upham Street, Unit #2 Broomfield, Colorado 80020 Test Date: September 17, 2002 Test Specifications : EMI requirements CFR Title 47, Part 15 Subpart B; and Subpart C, Sections 15.205, 15.209, and 15.231 Test Procedure: ANSI C63.4: 1992 Test Deviations: The test procedure was not deviated from during the testing. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS TEST DESCRIPTION RESULTS 1 Conducted RF Emissions, 450 kHz - 30 MHz This test was not performed because the EUT operates on battery power only and cannot be plugged into the AC public mains. 2 Radiated RF Emissions, 10 kHz - 4300 MHz Complies with the Class B limits of CFR Title 47, Part 15, Subpart B; and Subpart C, sections 15.205, 15.209, and 15.231. Report Number: B20917A1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM 114 OLINDA DRIVE, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 PHONE: (714) 579-0500 FAX: (714) 579-1850 Page 5 of 16 1. PURPOSE This document is a qualification test report based on the Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) tests performed on the Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM. The EMI measurements were performed according to the measurement procedure described in ANSI C63.4: 1992. The tests were performed in order to determine whether the electromagnetic emissions from the equipment under test, referred to as EUT hereafter, are within the Class B specification limits defined by CFR Title 47, Part 15, Subpart B; and Subpart C, sections 15.205, 15.209, and 15.231. Report Number: B20917A1 FCC Part 15 Subpart B and FCC Section 15.231 Test Report Remote Control Model: K24A-PRF+RFTM 114 OLINDA DRIVE, BREA, CALIFORNIA 92823 PHONE: (714) 579-0500 FAX: (714) 579-1850 Page 6 of 16 2. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 2.1 Location of Testing The EMI tests described herein were performed at the test facility of Compatible Electronics, 114 Olinda Drive, Brea, California 92823. 2.2 Traceability Statement The calibration certificates of all test equipment used during the test are on file at the location of the test. The calibration is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) . 2.3 Cognizant Personnel Electronic Solutions, Inc. Gary Skinner President Compatible Electronics, Inc. Kyle Fujimoto Test Engineer Michael Christensen Test Engineer 2.4 Date Test Sample was Received The test sample was received on September 16, 2002. 2.5 Disposition of the Test Sample The sample has not been returned to Electronic Solutions, Inc. as of September 18, 2002. 2.6 Abbreviations and Acron…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.