Q87-WPC200Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter

Cisco-Linksys LLC 121 Theory Drive Irvine, CA 92617 (USA) Phone: 949-261-1288 Fax: 949-823-3002 Date: April 7, 2006 FCC ID: Q87-WPC200 Federal Communications Commission Authorization and Evaluation Division Confidentiality Request Pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s Rules, the Applicant hereby requests confidential treatment of information accompanying this Application as outlined below: Schematics Block Diagram The above materials contain trade secrets and proprietary information not customarily released to the public. The public disclosure of these matters might be harmful to the Applicant and provide unjustified benefits to its competitors. The Applicant understands that pursuant to Rule 0.457, disclosure of this Application and all accompanying documentation will not be made before the date of the Grant for this application. Sincerely yours, __________________________________________ Jennifer Yu / Associate Engineer Cisco-Linksys LLC Tel.: ( 949 ) 823-3188 Fax: ( 949 ) 823-3002 [email protected]

Cisco-Linksys LLC 121 Theory Drive Irvine, CA 92617 (USA) Phone: 949-261-1288 Fax: 949-823-3002 Agency Authorization Letter Date: April 7, 2006 To whom it may concern: We, the undersigned, hereby authorize Advance Data Technology Corp. (ADT) of Taiwan to act on our behalf, as our agent, in the following matters related to the FCC approval of our products: report submittal, related correspondence, the signing of all documents relating to these matters, and any other lawful activity necessary to obtain such certification. Any act carried out by ADT within the scope of this authorization shall have the same effects as our own. This authorization shall expire six months from the original date. If you have any questions regarding the authorization, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Thank you! Sincerely yours, __________________________________________ Jennifer Yu / Associate Engineer Cisco-Linksys LLC Tel.: ( 949 ) 823-3188 Fax: ( 949 ) 823-3002 [email protected]

Model No.: WPC200 Page 1 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT Page 2

Page 3 Page 4

FCC ID: Q87-WPC200 Report No.: RF940525L09E Technical Description This device is a Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter that operates in the 2.4GHz frequency spectrum with throughput of up to 54Mbps which OFDM technique will be applied. If the signal to noise radio is too poor which could not support 54Mbps, the 11Mbps data rate with DSSS technique will be applied. The transmitter of the EUT is powered by host equipment. The antenna is PCB and PIFA antenna without antenna connector. The other instruction, please have a look at the users manual.

Report no.: SA940525L09E1Report Format Version 2.0.3 Reference No.: 950329L12 SAR TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: SA940525L09E MODEL NO.: WPC200 RECEIVED: Nov. 04, 2005 TESTED: Nov. 08, 2005 ISSUED: Apr. 03, 2006 APPLICANT : Cisco-Linksys LLC ADDRESS : 121 Theory Drive Irvine, CA 92617 (USA) ISSUED BY: Advance Data Technology Corporation LAB ADDRESS: No. 47, 14 th Ling, Chia Pau Tsuen, Lin Kou Hsiang 244, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEST LOCATION: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2 nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. This test report consists of 35 pages in total except Appendix. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by CNLA, A2LA or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Report no.: SA940525L09E2Report Format Version 2.0.3 Reference No.: 950329L12 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.CERTIFICATION.....................................................................................................3 2.GENERAL INFORMATION.....................................................................................4 2.1GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT.......................................................................4 2.2GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS.........................................5 2.3GENERAL INOFRMATION OF THE SAR SYSTEM................................................5 2.4GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SPATIAL PEAK SAR EVALUATION...............8 3.DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS..................................................................12 4.DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES AND CONFIGURATIONS...............................13 4.1.DESCRIPTION OF ANTENNA LOCATION...........................................................13 4.2.DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT POSITION.....................................................14 4.3.DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODE..........................................................................15 4.4.SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS...........................................................................15 5.TEST RESULTS...................................................................................................16 5.1TEST PROCEDURES..........................................................................................16 5.2MEASURED SAR RESULTS................................................................................18 5.3SAR LIMITS..........................................................................................................19 5.4RECIPES FOR TISSUE SIMULATING LIQUIDS..................................................20 5.5TEST EQUIPMENT FOR TISSUE PROPERTY....................................................22 6.SYSTEM VALIDATION.........................................................................................23 6.1TEST EQUIPMENT..............................................................................................23 6.2TEST PROCEDURE.............................................................................................24 6.3VALIDATION RESULTS........................................................................................26 6.4SYSTEM VALIDATION UNCERTAINTIES............................................................27 7.MEASUREMENT SAR PROCEDURE UNCERTAINTIES.....................................28 7.1.PROBE CALIBRATION UNCERTAINTY...............................................................28 7.2.ISOTROPY UNCERTAINTY.................................................................................29 7.3.BOUNDARY EFFECT UNCERTAINTY.................................................................29 7.4.PROBE LINEARITY UNCERTAINTY....................................................................30 7.5.READOUT ELECTRONICS UNCERTAINTY........................................................30 7.6.RESPONSE TIME UNCERTAINTY......................................................................30 7.7.INTEGRATION TIME UNCERTAINTY..................................................................31 7.8.PROBE POSITIONER MECHANICAL TOLERANCE...........................................32 7.9.PROBE POSITIONING.........................................................................................32 7.10.PHANTOM UNCERTAINTY..................................................................................33 7.11.DASY4 UNCERTAINTY BUDGET........................................................................34 8.INFORMATION ON THE TESTING LABORATORIES..........................................35 APPENDIX A: TEST CONFIGURATIONS AND TEST DATA APPENDIX B: ADT SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM APPENDIX C: PHOTOGRAPHS OF SYSTEM VALIDATION APPENDIX D: SYSTEM CERTIFICATE & CALIBRATION Report no.: SA940525L09E3Report Format Version 2.0.3 Reference No.: 950329L12 1. CERTIFICATION PRODUCT: Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter MODEL: WPC200 BRAND: Linksys APPLICANT: Cisco-Linksys LLC TESTED: Nov. 08, 2005 TEST SAMPLE: ENGINEERING SAMPLE STANDARDS: FCC Part 2 (Section 2.1093), FCC OET Bulletin 65, Supplement C (01-01), RSS-102 The above equipment has been tested by Advance Data Technology Corporation, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accounts of the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report. PREPARED BY :, DATE:Apr. 03, 2006 Rennie Wang TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE:, DATE:Apr. 03, 2006 Responsible for RF Stanely Hsu APPROVED BY:, DATE:Apr. 03, 2006 Gary Chang / Supervisor Report no.: SA940525L09E4Report Format Version 2.0.3 Reference No.: 950329L12 2. GENERAL INFORMATION 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT PRODUCT Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter MODEL NO.WPC200 FCC ID Q87-WPC200 POWER SUPPLY 3.3Vdc from host equipment CLASSIFICATION Por…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

A - 1 APPENDIX A: TEST DATA Liquid Level Photo MSL 2450MHz D=150mm A - 2 Date/Time: 2005/11/8 10:45:19 Test Laboratory: Advance Data Technology N800C-11b-Ch1-Mode 1 DUT: Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter ; Type: WPC200 ; Test Frequency: 2412 MHz Communication System: 802.11b ; Frequency: 2412 MHz ; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: MSL2450 Medium parameters used: f = 2412 MHz; σ = 1.92 mho/m; ε r = 52.9; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 ; Liquid Level : 150mm Phantom section: Flat Section ; DUT test position : Body ; Modulation Type: CCK Separation Distance : 12 mm ( The bottom side of the EUT to the Phantom) Antenna Type : PIFA Antenna ; Air Temp. : 22.7 degrees ; Liquid Temp. : 21.3 degrees DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1790 ; ConvF(4.35, 4.35, 4.35) ; Calibrated: 2004/12/20 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE3 Sn579 ; Calibrated: 2005/3/23 - Phantom: SAM 12 ; Type: SAM V4.0; Serial: TP 1202 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23 ; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 160 Low Channel 1/Area Scan (5x10x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.241 mW/g Low Channel 1/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 11.8 V/m Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.448 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.234 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.127 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.249 mW/g A - 3 Date/Time: 2005/11/8 11:03:21 Test Laboratory: Advance Data Technology N800C-11b-Ch6-Mode 1 DUT: Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter ; Type: WPC200 ; Test Frequency: 2437 MHz Communication System: 802.11b ; Frequency: 2437 MHz ; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: MSL2450 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; ε r = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 ; Liquid Level : 150mm Phantom section: Flat Section ; DUT test position : Body ; Modulation Type: CCK Separation Distance : 12 mm ( The bottom side of the EUT to the Phantom) Antenna Type : PIFA Antenna ; Air Temp. : 22.7 degrees ; Liquid Temp. : 21.3 degrees DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1790 ; ConvF(4.35, 4.35, 4.35) ; Calibrated: 2004/12/20 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE3 Sn579 ; Calibrated: 2005/3/23 - Phantom: SAM 12 ; Type: SAM V4.0; Serial: TP 1202 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23 ; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 160 Mid Channel 6/Area Scan (5x10x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.319 mW/g Mid Channel 6/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 13.6 V/m Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.580 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.303 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.164 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.321 mW/g A - 4 A - 5 Date/Time: 2005/11/8 11:19:48 Test Laboratory: Advance Data Technology N800C-11b-Ch11-Mode 1 DUT: Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter ; Type: WPC200 ; Test Frequency: 2462 MHz Communication System: 802.11b ; Frequency: 2462 MHz ; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: MSL2450 Medium parameters used: f = 2462 MHz; σ = 2 mho/m; ε r = 52.7; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 ; Liquid Level : 150mm Phantom section: Flat Section ; DUT test position : Body ; Modulation Type: CCK Separation Distance : 12 mm ( The bottom side of the EUT to the Phantom) Antenna Type : PIFA Antenna ; Air Temp. : 22.7 degrees ; Liquid Temp. : 21.3 degrees DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1790 ; ConvF(4.35, 4.35, 4.35) ; Calibrated: 2004/12/20 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE3 Sn579 ; Calibrated: 2005/3/23 - Phantom: SAM 12 ; Type: SAM V4.0; Serial: TP 1202 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23 ; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 160 High Channel 11/Area Scan (5x10x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.191 mW/g High Channel 11/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 10.3 V/m Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.359 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.183 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.099 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.194 mW/g A - 6 Date/Time: 2005/11/8 11:37:52 Test Laboratory: Advance Data Technology N800C-11g-Ch1-Mode 2 DUT: Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter ; Type: WPC200 ; Test Frequency: 2412 MHz Communication System: 802.11g ; Frequency: 2412 MHz ; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: MSL2450 Medium parameters used: f = 2412 MHz; σ = 1.92 mho/m; ε r = 52.9; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 ; Liquid Level : 150mm Phantom section: Flat Section ; DUT test position : Body ; Modulation Type: OFDM Separation Distance : 12 mm ( The bottom side of the EUT to the Phantom) Antenna Type : PIFA Antenna ; Air Temp. : 22.7 degrees ; Liquid Temp. : 21.3 degrees DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1790 ; ConvF(4.35, 4.35, 4.35) ; Calibrated: 2004/12/20 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection) - Electronics: DAE3 Sn579 ; Calibrated: 2005/3/23 - Phantom: SAM 12 ; Type: SAM V4.0; Serial: TP 1202 - Measurement SW: DASY4, V4.6 Build 23 ; Postprocessing SW: SEMCAD, V1.8 Build 160 Low Channel 1/Area Scan (5x10x1): Measurement grid: dx=15mm, dy=15mm Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.105 mW/g Low Channel 1/Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm Reference Value = 7.65 V/m Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 0.180 W/kg SAR(1 g) = 0.100 mW/g; SAR(10 g) = 0.055 mW/g Maximum value of SAR (measured) = 0.110 mW/g Date/Time: 2005/11/8 11:55:10 A - 7 Test Laboratory: Advance Data Technology N800C-11g-Ch6-Mode 2 DUT: Wireless-G Business Notebook Adapter ; Type: WPC200 ; Test Frequency: 2437 MHz Communication System: 802.11g ; Frequency: 2437 MHz ; Duty Cycle: 1:1 Medium: MSL2450 Medium parameters used: f = 2437 MHz; σ = 1.96 mho/m; ε r = 52.8; ρ = 1000 kg/m 3 ; Liquid Level : 150mm Phantom section: Flat Section ; DUT test position : Body ; Modulation Type: OFDM Separation Distance : 12 mm ( The bottom side of the EUT to the Phantom) Antenna Type : PIFA Antenna ; Air Temp. : 22.7 degrees ; Liquid Temp. : 21.3 degrees DASY4 Configuration: - Probe: ET3DV6 - SN1790 ; ConvF(4.35, 4.35, 4.35) ; Calibrated: 2004/12/20 - Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanic…

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

B - 1 APPENDIX B: ADT SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM C - 1 APPENDIX C: PHOTOGRAPHS OF SYSTEM VALIDATION D3: DAE SN: 579 APPENDIX D: SYSTEM CERTIFICATE & CALIBRATION D1: SAM PHANTOM

Report No.: RF940525L09E1Report Format Version 2.0.4 Reference No.: 950329L12 FCC TEST REPORT REPORT NO.: RF940525L09E MODEL NO.: WPC200 RECEIVED: Sep. 22, 2005 TESTED: Sep. 22 ~ Nov. 09, 2005 ISSUED: Mar. 31, 2006 APPLICANT : Cisco-Linksys LLC ADDRESS : 121 Theory Drive Irvine, CA 92617 (USA) ISSUED BY: Advance Data Technology Corporation LAB ADDRESS: No. 47, 14 th Ling, Chia Pau Tsuen, Lin Kou Hsiang 244, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, R.O.C. TEST LOCATION: No. 19, Hwa Ya 2 nd Rd, Wen Hwa Tsuen, Kwei Shan Hsiang, Taoyuan Hsien 333, Taiwan, R.O.C. This test report consists of 63 pages in total. It may be duplicated completely for legal use with the approval of the applicant. It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of our laboratory. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by CNLA, A2LA or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the tested sample. Report No.: RF940525L09E2Report Format Version 2.0.4 Reference No.: 950329L12 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.CERTIFICATION...........................................................................................................4 2.SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ..................................................................................5 2.1MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY................................................................................5 3.GENERAL INFORMATION ...........................................................................................6 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT .............................................................................6 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODES ...............................................................................7 3.2.1 CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST ..........................................................7 3.2.2 TEST MODE APPLICABILITY AND TESTED CHANNEL DETAIL ...............................8 3.2.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS ............................................10 3.2.4 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS .......................................................................10 4. TEST TYPES AND RESULTS .................................................................................... 11 4.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ............................................................. 11 4.1.1 LIMITS OF CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT........................................... 11 4.1.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS................................................................................................ 11 4.1.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................12 4.1.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD.......................................................................12 4.1.5 TEST SETUP..............................................................................................................13 4.1.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ...............................................................................13 4.1.7 TEST RESULTS .........................................................................................................14 4.2 RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT ..................................................................20 4.2.1 LIMITS OF RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT................................................20 4.2.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS................................................................................................21 4.2.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................22 4.2.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD.......................................................................23 4.2.5 TEST SETUP..............................................................................................................23 4.2.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ...............................................................................23 4.2.7 TEST RESULTS .........................................................................................................24 4.3 6dB BANDWIDTH MEASUREMENT..........................................................................31 4.3.1 LIMITS OF 6dB BANDWIDTH MEASUREMENT .......................................................31 4.3.2 TEST INSTRUMENTS................................................................................................31 4.3.3 TEST PROCEDURE...................................................................................................32 4.3.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD.......................................................................32 4.3.5 TEST SETUP..............................................................................................................32 4.3.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ...............................................................................32 4.3.7 TEST RESULTS .........................................................................................................33 4.4 MAXIMUM PEAK OUTPUT POWER..........................................................................39 4.4.1 LIMITS OF MAXIMUM PEAK OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT ..........................39 4.4.2 INSTRUMENTS..........................................................................................................39 4.4.3 TEST PROCEDURES ................................................................................................40 4.4.4 DEVIATION FROM TEST STANDARD.......................................................................40 4.4.5 TEST SETUP..............................................................................................................40 4.4.6 EUT OPERATING CONDITIONS ...............................................................................40 4.4.7 TEST RESULTS .........................................................................................................41 4.5 POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY MEASUREMENT .....................................................42 4.5.1 LIMITS OF POWER …

Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.

Report No.: RF940525L09E60Report Format Version 2.0.4 Reference No.: 950329L12 5. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST Report No.: RF940525L09E61Report Format Version 2.0.4 Reference No.: 950329L12 RADIATED EMISSION TEST