
Text extracted from the exhibit documents filed with the FCC. Open a document above to read the original.
30 May, 2007 Stuart Beck, Director of Certification, Nemko Canada Inc., 303 River Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1V 1H2 and Equipment Authorization Division Federal Communications Commission 7435 Oakland Mills Road Columbia, MD 21046 Dear Stuart, Reference: Vecima Networks Inc. OOX-915C Request for Confidentiality Vecima Networks Inc. requests that the following information regarding the submission of this application be withheld from public inspection, in accordance with CRF 0.457 and 0.459: β’ Circuit schematics (file: 915C Schematic confidential.pdf) β’ Bill of materials (file: 915C BOM confidential.xls) β’ Block Diagrams (file: 915C Block Diagram confidential.pdf) β’ Operational Description (file: 915C Functional Overview confidential.pdf) β’ βUserβs Guideβ (file: TN150B - 915C Radio Operational Requirements - Confidential.pdf) The reasons for which confidentiality has been requested are: β’ This product serves a unique and competitive niche in the wireless market. β’ This information is considered to be proprietary in nature. β’ This information is considered to be commercially and competitively sensitive. The file βTN150B - 915C Radio Operational Requirements - Confidential.pdfβ is highly technical and is not released to the general public or end user. This is a technical integration and manufacturing guide that is used internally and by professional manufacturers of products using the 915C radio under the control of Vecima Networks. Lawrence Gordon, Senior Technical Design Lead, Vecima Networks Inc., Suite 208, 6036 - 3 St. SW, Calgary, Alta., Canada, T2H 0H9 Tel/Fax: (403) 253-5366, Cell: (403) 616-5668
915C Radio Photos TOP β No RF Shield Top β RF Shield BOTTOM β No RF Shield BOTTOM β RF Shield
19 October 2007 To Whom It May Concern: Reference: FCC ID βOOX-915Cβ and IC β2943C-915Cβ Labeling The drawing below represents the labelling for the 915C, showing the FCC and Industry Canada IDs. This labelling is part of the silkscreen on the PCB itself. The highlighting is NOT part of the label, just to show where the label is and its contents. Yours truly, Lawrence Gordon, Senior Technical Design Lead, Vecima Networks Inc., Suite 208, 6036 - 3 St. SW, Calgary, Alta., Canada, T2H 0H9 Tel/Fax: (403) 253-5366, Cell: (403) 616-5668
915C Radio Photos TOP β No RF Shield Top β RF Shield BOTTOM β No RF Shield BOTTOM β RF Shield
RF Exposure Calculations As per OET Bulletin 65 β Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields β Edition 97-01 together with Supplement C (Ed. 01-01, June 2001) and Industry Canada RSS-102 (Issue 2, Nov. 2005), the maximum power density allowed for general population/uncontrolled exposure is f/1500 mW/cm 2 = f/150 W/m 2 , where f is the frequency of operation in MHz. Calculating for the lowest frequency of operation (905MHz), the maximum power density allowed is 0.603 mW/cm 2 = 6.03 W/m 2 . The power density is calculated as follows: S = (P*G)/(4*pi*R 2 ) = EIRP/(4*pi*R 2 ) where: S = power density in mW/cm 2 P = power at the antenna connector in mW G = linear system gain of the antenna R = separation from antenna (cm) EIRP = Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (mW). By convention, a minimum separation distance of 20 cm has been used for indoor antennas. Applying this distance to the radiation exposure limits, the EIRP is limited to 3.03 W or 34.8 dBm. The min. separation distance required for an EIRP of 36 dBm or 4 W is 22.9 cm. At 30 cm, the EIRP could be as high as 38.3 dBm and still meet the max. power density requirement. The 915C Radio Module has several antenna types that are intended to be fix mounted outdoors with a maximum radiated power of 36 dBm EIRP. These installations must be a min. of 30 cm. from people as per the 915C Radio Operational Requirements document. Therefore the FCC and IC requirements for human exposure to RF radiation are met. The Industry Canada RF Technical Brief Cover Sheet is provided below. Annex A β RF Technical Brief Cover Sheet All Fields must be completed with the requested information or the following codes: N/A β Not Applicable, N/P β Not Performed or N/V β Not Available Where applicable, check appropriate box. 1. COMPANY NUMBER: 2943C 2. MODEL NUMBER: 915C 3. MANUFACTURER: Vecima Networks Inc. 4. TYPE OF EVALUATION: Complete the applicable sections: (a) SAR Evaluation: Device Used in the Vicinity of the Human Head (b) SAR Evaluation: Body-worn Device (c) RF Evaluation Note: The worst-case scenario (i.e. highest measured value obtained) should be reported. (a) SAR Evaluation: Device Used in the Vicinity of the Human Head Multiple transmitters: Yes No Evaluated against exposure limits: General Public Use Controlled Use Duty cycle used in evaluation: _____________% Standard used for evaluation: __________________________ SAR value: __________W/kg Measured Computed Calculated (b) SAR Evaluation: Body-worn Device Multiple transmitters: Yes No Evaluated against exposure limits: General Public Use Controlled Use Duty cycle used in evaluation: _____________% Standard used for evaluation: __________________________ SAR value: __________W/kg Measured Computed Calculated (c) RF Evaluation Evaluated against exposure limits: General Public Use Controlled Use Duty cycle used in evaluation: ______100_______% Standard used for evaluation: ___RF Exposure Evaluation______ Measurement distance: ________0.20________m RF Value: ______6 ___V/m A/m W/m 2 Measured Computed Calculated
www.nemko.com FCC Part 15 Subpart C, 15.247 : October 2006 Test Report: 86732-1TRFWL Applicant: Vecima Networks Inc. Suite 4, 6110 - 1A Street SW Calgary, Alberta T2H 0G3 Apparatus: 915C Radio Module FCC ID: OOX-915C In Accordance With: FCC Part 15 Subpart C, 15.247 FHSS System and Digitally Modulated Radiators 902-928MHz, 2400 - 2483.5 MHz, 5725-5850MHz Tested By: Nemko Canada Inc. 303 River Road Ottawa, Ontario K1V 1H2 Authorized By: Jin Xu, Wireless Specialist Date: October 15, 2007 Total Number of Pages: 67 Nemko Canada Inc. REPORT SUMMARY Report Number: 86732-1TRFWL FCC ID: OOX-915C Specification: FCC Part 15 Subpart C, 15.247 Page 2 of 67 Report Summary These tests were conducted on a sample of the equipment for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with Part 15, Subpart C. Radiated tests were conducted in accordance with ANSI C63.4-2003. Radiated emissions are made on an open area test site. A description of the test facility is on file with the FCC. The assessment summary is as follows: Apparatus Assessed: 915C Radio Module Specification: FCC Part 15 Subpart C, 15.247 Compliance Status: Complies Exclusions: None Non-compliances: None Report Release History: Original Release Author: Jason Nixon, Telecom Specialist Note that the results contained in this report relate only to the items tested and were obtained in the period between the date of initial receipt of samples and the date of issue of the report. This test report has been completed in accordance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025. Nemko Canada Inc. authorizes the applicant to reproduce this report provided it is reproduced in its entirety and for use by the companyβs employees only. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Nemko Canada Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. Nemko Canada Inc. REPORT SUMMARY Report Number: 86732-1TRFWL FCC ID: OOX-915C Specification: FCC Part 15 Subpart C, 15.247 Page 3 of 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS Report Summary......................................................................................................................................... 2 Section 1 : Equipment Under Test............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Product Identification .................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Samples Submitted for Assessment............................................................................................................4 1.3 Theory of Operation ...................................................................................................................................4 1.4 Technical Specifications of the EUT ..........................................................................................................5 1.5 Block Diagram of the EUT.........................................................................................................................5 Section 2 : Test Conditions......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Specifications .............................................................................................................................................6 2.2 Deviations From Laboratory Test Procedures ............................................................................................6 2.3 Test Environment .......................................................................................................................................6 2.4 Test Equipment...........................................................................................................................................6 2.5 Measurement Uncertainty...........................................................................................................................7 Section 3 : Observations ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Modifications Performed During Assessment ............................................................................................8 3.2 Record Of Technical Judgements ...............................................................................................................8 3.3 EUT Parameters Affecting Compliance .....................................................................................................8 3.4 Test Deleted................................................................................................................................................8 3.5 Additional Observations .............................................................................................................................8 Section 4 : Results Summary ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 FCC Part 15 Subpart C : Test Results ......................................................................................................10 Appendix A : Test Results ........................................................................................................................ 11 Clause 15.109(a) Radiated Emissions..................................................................................................................11 Clause 15.207(a) Powerline Conducted Emissions .............................................................................................13 Clause 15.247(a)(2) Systems using digital modulation techniques .....................................................................22 Clause 15.247(b)(3) Maximum peak output power of systems using digital modulation in the 902-928 Mβ¦
Text truncated - open the document above for the full version.
Suite 208 Β· Calgary, Alberta Β· Canada
| # | Rule Parts | Frequency Range | Power Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15C | 905 MHz - 925 MHz | 450.00 mW |

Outdoor Modem
Equipment Class
DTS - Digital Transmission System
Radio Module
Equipment Class
DTS - Digital Transmission System
Wireless Modem
Equipment Class
DTS - Digital Transmission System
Wireless LAN end-users modem
Equipment Class
DTS - Digital Transmission System
Wireless LAN end-user modem
Equipment Class
DTS - Digital Transmission System